Slashdot Mirror


Ships Infected With Ransomware, USB Malware, Worms (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: IT systems on boats aren't as air-gapped as people think and are falling victims to all sorts of cyber-security incidents, such as ransomware, worms, viruses, and other malware -- usually carried on board via USB sticks. These cyber-security incidents have been kept secret until now, and have only been recently revealed as past examples of what could go wrong, in a new "cyber-security guideline" released by 21 international shipping associations and industry groups. One of the many incidents: "A new-build dry bulk ship was delayed from sailing for several days because its ECDIS was infected by a virus. The ship was designed for paperless navigation and was not carrying paper charts. The failure of the ECDIS appeared to be a technical disruption and was not recognized as a cyber issue by the ship's master and officers. A producer technician was required to visit the ship and, after spending a significant time in troubleshooting, discovered that both ECDIS networks were infected with a virus. The virus was quarantined and the ECDIS computers were restored. The source and means of infection in this case are unknown. The delay in sailing and costs in repairs totaled in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (U.S.)." The document also highlights an incident involving ransomware. "For example, a shipowner reported not one, but two ransomware infections, both occurring due to partners, and not necessarily because of the ship's crew," reports ZDNet. Another ransomware incident occurred because the ship failed to set up proper (RDP) passwords: A ransomware infection on the main application server of the ship caused complete disruption of the IT infrastructure. The ransomware encrypted every critical file on the server and as a result, sensitive data were lost, and applications needed for ship's administrative operations were unusable. The incident was reoccurring even after complete restoration of the application server. The root cause of the infection was poor password policy that allowed attackers to brute force remote management services successfully. The company's IT department deactivated the undocumented user and enforced a strong password policy on the ship's systems to remediate the incident.

65 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Windows, right? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't run ships on Windows, for obvious reasons.

    Also, not carrying ANY paper charts as a backup? Dumb, dumb, DUMB.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Windows, right? by chromaexcursion · · Score: 2

      Running windows? Wrong, they don't, they have at least that much of a clue.
      No paper charts, that's a different story. WTF do they do after a lightning strike?

      oh, by the way, I own a boat, and have paper charts.

    2. Re:Windows, right? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Remember Windows for Warships? One app divided by zero and crashed the entire network. First time we lost a navy ship to a zero since WWII.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Windows, right? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Don't run ships on Windows"

      I saw the header and I thought: is this about "IT systems on boats" or "Windows on boats"? Then I saw the part about RDP passwords and it became clear. This is, again, about Windows.

      Yeah, someone will come here to tell, once more, "oh, if other systems were as popular as Windows, then they would be equally cracked", but somehow, it is still Windows, Windows, Windows.

      Even if it only were a bit of "security through obscurity" and it were only to work for a few years, choosing "whatever is not Windows" would still be a nobrainer from a security perspective!

    4. Re:Windows, right? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Running windows? Wrong, they don't, they have at least that much of a clue.
      No paper charts, that's a different story."

      Given that knowing where are you in the middle of the sea has been a most important matter for seamen for thousands of years ans still they do such a dumb thing as not having paper charts, what makes you think there remains anything of a clue with them?

      Then, what other systems but Windows do you think use Remote Desktop for an access protocol?

    5. Re: Windows, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a company making radar and ECDIS, they do run on Windows and in some cases really quite old versions of Windows. We made equipment for big ships, not boats.

    6. Re: Windows, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can confirm this. I've personally been on 3 large ships in the last couple years and I remember being shocked at the Windows XP screens.

    7. Re:Windows, right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Remember Windows for Warships?

      Windows isn't the problem though. As the summary pointed out, it was due to weak passwords leading to remote management services being brute forced. Running Linux doesn't make the IT department magically more competent, in fact it can have the opposite effect as they turn to Stack Overflow for help with an unfamiliar system.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Windows, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Real people do not care about computers but about what can be done with computers. Real People do not care or want to waste time learning about tools more than it is strictly necessary, because Real People have better things to do with their time, lime family, friends and social events. Life, in other words. Only nerds are obsessed with computers because they have no life. No family except their ling-suffering parents, no friends and no social life. One day they find out they're in their mid-forties with no real jobs, no marketable skills and above all, no life. What will they do when their parents become ill, too old, and cannot support them anymore? Their dreams of greatness are in ashes, the "dumb jocks" who were meant to "work for them one day" have gone on to have lucrative careers and good lives, and married the girls they could only lust after. Life is hard, isn't it? Enjoy your computer's "friendship", nerd: it's only getting worse.

    9. Re: Windows, right? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      If you had the technical accumen you claim you would know that RDP is Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol. Most major corporations are still so technically inept that they still run Windows. What made you think these ships administrators would be smarter?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:Windows, right? by sad_ · · Score: 1

      what's also dumb is no backups and a weak security configuration.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    11. Re: Windows, right? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on if the undocumented user was there at install time as a Windows default or not.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:Windows, right? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also, not carrying ANY paper charts as a backup? Dumb, dumb, DUMB.

      Shouldn't this be, like, illegal? Nobody should be piloting that much metal around the planet without knowing what they are doing with it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re: Windows, right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Windows doesn't have undocumented users there at install time.

      It must have been someone installing it for easy maintenance. Probably an admin user set up specifically for RDP.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: Windows, right? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That is a claim you make, not a fact you know.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re: Windows, right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it was an undocumented account that existed at install time it would have been widely publicised by now, not least in this report on ship cybersecurity. Obviously no-one can prove a negative, but unless you have evidence of this extraordinary claim then the probability of it being true is extremely low.

      Considering the amount of scrutiny that Windows is under I find it hard to believe that an entire user account which could be logged in to remotely could exist and not be discovered. It would have to be hidden from all the usual places where user accounts are enumerated and configured, such as the registry and standard APIs. It would be under active exploit in the wild and yet none of the people who found it bothered to report it publicly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: Windows, right? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You don't even know what version of Windows. Perhaps it was an OEM version only shipped on ships. My only claim is that neither of us know. You are the one making a claim based solely on conjecture

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: Windows, right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Interesting the actual report doesn't even mention the OS, so it could have been Linux or anything else.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re: Windows, right? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It mentions RDP, worms, and viruses, so they mention Windows implicitly, you just aren't smart enough to understand what you read.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    19. Re: Windows, right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Neither "Windows" nor "RDP" appear in the actual report: http://www.ics-shipping.org/do...

      You fell for the article's fake news, because you aren't smart enough to check sources.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Windows, right? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Heh I used to always make sure I brought a paper map on offroad rallies as a backup to the tablet-based navigation system. These days it's not so important as I now have the exact same setup on my phone, but I haven't bothered to take the folded paper map out of the navigator's clipboard...

      Closest I came to needing it is when the tablet's microSD card spontaneously ejected into a field somewhere, good thing I had that backed up and the map files were in onboard storage...haven't put a microSD back in it since.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    21. Re: Windows, right? by sosume · · Score: 2

      > Most major corporations are still so technically inept that they still run Windows

      Yes, so sad, as this is the year of Linux on the Desktop, ofcourse! A Linux desktop won't present any issues at all - large ships can be easily patched mid-sea with a new kernel should a security issue occur! And as everyone knows only Windows is hackable, Linux is completely hackerproof. the X desktop is very well suited for day to day work, users just love its window composition, choice of available software and design. Since these ships have 24/7 high speed internet they might as well run all software in a browser. Wow, you are so technically proficient, I'm sure you would be an excellent architect at a shipping company!!

    22. Re:Windows, right? by pgmrdlm · · Score: 2

      I was curious after your statement what operating system is actual on ships. And according to this site, IT IS WINDOWS.
      https://www.marinemec.com/news...
      Shipowners should update their onboard computer systems to the latest Windows operating system, if they are on Windows XP for instance, to avoid viral disruptions. They should also consider upgrading satellite communications with VSAT and a smart communications module, such as Speedcast's Sigma Gateway.

      Navios group IT director Katerina Raptaki explained that most of the computers on ships it operates are updated to the latest operating systems. âoeWe have spent a lot of money and human resources to update our onboard computers to the latest Windows as it expands the possibility of the resources,â she said at a seminar co-hosted by Riviera Maritime Media and Speedcast.

      However, not all systems on Navios' ships were updated as the cargo control systems remain on Windows XP operating systems because of the cost of getting shipyards to update the software, Ms Raptaki explained. She was involved in discussions at the Reality and Future of the Digital Ship seminar during Nor-Shipping near Oslo, Norway.


      I only looked this up out of curiosity.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    23. Re: Windows, right? by sosume · · Score: 1

      Now this deserves a +5 Insightful, but ofcourse the trolls are too busy bashing the most widely used OS on the planet.

    24. Re: Windows, right? by PPH · · Score: 1

      nothing to do with the OS

      Real multitasking OSs don't crash (and take the network with them) when one application crashes.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    25. Re: Windows, right? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      None of these issues apply in the real world to how these systems would be used if they were sensibly designed. It doesn't matter how much software is available to systems which should never run any software they didn't ship with. You don't patch, you replace the whole image while you're in port — preferably from physical media, not OTA. There's few enough ships to where this remains reasonable. If you want to do some accounting or play games you use a wholly different system, preferably one air-gapped from the critical systems.

      A Linux system would be a whole lot less likely to be compromised during the install process, which is historically a time when Windows is vulnerable — between installation, and service packing. So at least for one of the systems discussed in TFS, it would likely have solved the problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Windows, right? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Running windows? Wrong, they don't, they have at least that much of a clue.

      You sure about that? Hell, I remember when they announced that *nuclear submarines* would be running on *Windows NT*.

      So much for "military grade security".

    27. Re:Windows, right? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't this be, like, illegal? Nobody should be piloting that much metal around the planet without knowing what they are doing with it.

      Interesting point.

      I don't know if it's illegal or not, but honestly, it's mind-boggling to me that a ship of any size would head out to sea without paper backup charts. The captain must be a genuine dumbfuck not to think ahead about the possibility of some sort of computer failure occurring, whatever the cause.

      I mean, who the hell is that confident in their computer systems? A briefcase of "emergency" charts would have made this a non-story that we probably never would have even have heard of.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    28. Re: Windows, right? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Real people do not care about computers but about what can be done with computers.

      Your statement is moronic at best and poor trolling at worst. Only a simpleton would make a statement like you did.

      I'm a real person and I care about my computer(s). I don't want then to get infected or fail, so I do my best to take care of them.

      It's no different than changing the oil in your car or making sure your dog/cat/horse/whatever is healthy and properly cared for.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. LOL @ terminology by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    If you are allowing people to plug USB sticks into your computer you aren't as "air gapped" as you think you are. Sneaker-net is still a net. Air-gapped means no connection to the outside AT ALL.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:LOL @ terminology by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      I think that's rather the point of this article. However, some of this is just plain stupid--critical systems should be kept pretty strictly locked down, very possibly with either no ability to communicate or only able to receive messages for the humans aboard to access. (If you want to be really paranoid, lock that down to plaintext only.)

      And, y'know, never ever ever be so moronic as to not have non-computer backups. Especially for your navigation. Maybe they were sailing under flags chosen in part because the country in question is really laid-back about maritime safety? Flags of convenience are unfortunately often chosen because it's cheaper to comply with the regulations, and probably also because the country doesn't particularly enforce it--it's roughly equivalent to if you could have your car registered anywhere in the world and it has to be accepted as street-legal where you are...even if the place you've registered it pretty much doesn't care about anything (including if what you are registering is, in point of fact, a functioning car) as long as your payment clears.

    2. Re: LOL @ terminology by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      Being airgapped isn't the problem. They should look into watergapping. I bet that's how those pesky viruses got on the ship. (water == conductor. It's elementary!)

    3. Re: LOL @ terminology by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      CIA dolphins planting electrodes to the hull... /tinfoilhat

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re: LOL @ terminology by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Actually that is the very definition of air gapped. In order to transfer files you sneaker-net. How else do you propose to apply updates and do other requisite file transfers?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re: LOL @ terminology by sosume · · Score: 1

      If it's airgapped no updates will ever be needed. And file transfers would be strictly forbidden as well.

  3. Air-Gapped. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Air gaping in network terms means no connection possible. More in fluid flow terms, a semi abuse of language from a time of solely wired connections. Air gapped really means no connections allowed, wired or unwired. Ships by their very nature can not be air gapped, communications need to be maintained.

    The ships system should be locked down though only capable of taking input from wired connections, never ever wireless and that USB port should be locked behind a safe in the Captains cabin. Flexible == to insecure in the digital world, only capable of doing what it was specifically designed to do should be the rule of law for digital security.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:Air-Gapped. by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the air gap point.
      As to your other. You don't understand shipping, and they're clueless. Need to be educated.

    2. Re: Air-Gapped. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Air gapped means no network connection from the LAN to the WAN. It has nothing to do with wireless vs wired connections. What makes you think that a wired connection to the outside world is significantly safer than a well encrypted wireless one?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Air-Gapped. by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Right they should be air gapped.

      Why aren't they?

      Because if you air gap them then the manufacturer of the software and control systems can't monitor their performance, provide bug fixes, and record data on their customers.

      Yeah for the same reason other systems aren't air gapped. Its good for the corporation who made the systems and bad for the customer. Just like for all the other systems that use computer software.

      Why is Windows used instead of Linux or a proprietary system?

      For the same reason Windows is used in hospitals, power plants, and other places. It's cheaper for the developer and cheaper for the customer, and cheaper always wins out.

  4. Worms? by fredrated · · Score: 2

    Once it was the wood-eating teredo worm that sank ships, now it's data-eating worms!

  5. No paper charts? by Solandri · · Score: 1

    A new-build dry bulk ship was delayed from sailing for several days because its ECDIS was infected by a virus. The ship was designed for paperless navigation and was not carrying paper charts.

    Not foreseeing malware problems can be kinda forgiven if you're ignorant of IT. But not having paper charts on board? That's utter stupidity. You're going to risk the ship and the life of everyone on board because you don't want to pay about $100 for a set of waterproof charts? Never mind malware. What happens if a generator glitch sends a power surge through the onboard power system? Or a rogue wave smashes in a bridge window dumping salt water on all the electronics?

    1. Re:No paper charts? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      I think you can get maps for free at a Texaco station - but perhaps I am dating myself.

      It's almost inconceivable to go out into the middle of the ocean with *no charts*. If nothing else, put the charts on a backup iPad or something at least good enough to find a safe port.

    2. Re:No paper charts? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      ECDIS does much more than just simple google style nav. ECDIS also understands ship draft, water depth, turning radius, etc and is designed to keep the ship from doing something stupid like the Valdez did. ECDIS also looks for dynamic collision dangers fro other ships with radar feeds. So even if a ship has paper charts, the regulators, insurers or owners will not risk a drowsy watch running into a rock thus risking life, limb or billion dollar damage/fine payout. Would you fly intercontinental if you knew the plane only had paper charts and a sextant?

  6. Well of course not! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ships are not air-gapped, they are water-gapped!

    And everyone knows that salt water conducts.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. What? No backup systems? by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was in the Navy back in the early '70s, when LORAN was still king. Our ship not only had paper charts for the Quartermaster's Mates to track our position by dead reckoning, we took regular star sightings with a sextant for Celestial Navigation. And, we still had two mechanical chronometers that were kept wound, even though the ship's navigator had an Omega watch that was more accurate. The USN doesn't take chances with things like this and I'd bet that today's ships still use dead reckoning, hand-wound chronometers and sextants even with today's highly accurate GPS, just to keep in practice in case of an emergency.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  8. Sequel by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "I'm the Nigerian Prince of the world!"

  9. Re:USB scoffs at your airgap by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    In critical applications you should be using embedded hardware that doesn't have usb unless absolutely required...
    And even if you do have usb ports, you should be using an embedded os that only contains drivers for the specific usb devices its required to interface with.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  10. Re:USB scoffs at your airgap by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    usually carried on board via USB sticks.

    Well the USB and other similar external connectors should always be hard-disabled in mission critical applications.

    Firstly, that's not going to help when your "mission critical" system is running Windows. Sooner or later the outside world is going to be reachable and if you're stupid enough to be running Windows then your system is going to be hosed.

    What sort of drooling imbecile walks a USB device into the facility and plugs it into a system like that? Have we learnt nothing whatsoever from all the other cases since years where that was the attack vector for an airgapped system?

    Yeah, unlike a facility on land, on a ship the crew might be away for weeks and might just want to bring things with them on a USB stick. Having security that relies on the user not being human is stupid. If you're going to shut away humans for weeks at a time you must be really dumb to be surprised that they want to bring entertainment for that period.

    Instead of castigating the users for being human, you should have been castigating the techies for choosing Windows in the first place.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  11. Someone doesn't know what "air gapped" means by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Since they usually propogate via USB *drives* (not "sticks") then I'm going to go ahead and say they are exactly as air gapped as one might think.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Someone doesn't know what "air gapped" means by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      If the system is air gapped then Intel ME is not an attack vector. If you then physically disable USB, Iightning, and other ports then you can make the assumption because it no longer is an assumption, but rather a surety.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  12. we, as a comumity can solve this by houghi · · Score: 1

    HACK TEH PLANET!

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Re:Access-control by nnull · · Score: 2

    That means spending money. How dare you suggest that?!?

  14. most ships have COTS systems by johnjones · · Score: 1

    often COTS run windows, the navigation/sensors tends to be seperate network. Like all systems you need management and maintenance of those systems just like the engine etc

    The problem comes when no one takes responsibility

     

  15. Re:What? No backup systems? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    If a 30y lifespan is necessary on both hardware and software, why would you go with Windows at all? How easy is it to run Windows 2.x and MsDOS 3 on modern hardware?

    Now how easy is it to run and compile simple software under any version of Linux, even if it came from something arcane like SunOS or SCO Unix.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  16. Re: USB scoffs at your airgap by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    So in your mind the USB drive driver wouldn't be present. I suppose if the only thing it was used for was 2 Factor Auth, but I think in the cast majority of cases the USB drive would be used for sneaker-netting if the system is air gapped.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  17. NOT air gapped by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    They have satellite internet.
    Some even fast enough connection to watch movies.
    Air gap means NO outside connection.
    Ships are NOT air gapped.

  18. Re:What? No backup systems? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Windows is fine for some things, but the networks need to be segregated and external comms to critical systems should be proxied for status only and not control.

    It sounds like the networks are even less robust than an automotive network, and they need to be more like an airplane.

  19. Re:What? No backup systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Given the recent collisions my guess is that seamanship isn't the US Navy's strong suit at the moment.

  20. Autorun should be banned from the planet by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    There is absolutely no good reason to keep Autorun on USB devices as a thing. People just need to learn to open Windows Explorer, and browse to an .exe to run if they need to install something. If it is drivers they are worried about, then provide simple steps on the device in print for where to download drivers. That is it, end-stop-goodbye.

  21. Were the ransome peeps ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... shadowing the goddam ship's starboard aft and hopping a WiFi that was just a LAN?

    The root cause of the infection was poor password policy that allowed attackers ...

    Or did they land an Internet-connected drone on the deck and snake an Ethernet cable down to the server to "attack," it? What is "air gap" again?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  22. Malware file discovered by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    iamthecaptainnow.exe

  23. Re:What? No backup systems? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    When I was in the Navy, I was assigned to After Steering, just above the rudder. If the connections from the bridge to the rudder failed, we could steer from there, and often did for practice. If the motors moving the rudder died, we could even turn it manually, although very slowly, and the ship would be brought down to a safe speed. (No, I never had to do it, but I know it was done during a combat drill once.) Of course, we only had one rudder and I hate to think of how many men it would take to turn an aircraft carrier that way.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  24. Re:USB scoffs at your airgap by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

    This is a problem because management will not force control systems to be air gapped. And I don't mean from the Internet I mean from other computers at the same location.

    The way such a system should be designed is that any system having to to do with ship control should be on it's own network. This network should only be accessible for update/file download from a secure station onboard the ship and only accessible to a technician while in port.

    All personal/administrative computer should be a a different network. If your administrative stuff is important enough it too should be on a separate network.

    As soon as you let people start using your network for personal letters, email and entertainment you are screwed.

    Why aren't things done this way? Because companies are cheap. They don't want to maintain separate hard networks. They don't want to have to pay technicians to actually visit the ships to update software, and they don't want to pay what they would have to pay to get competent computer technicians to actually travel with the ship. Figure what a top IT person gets and then add the premium they would want for spending 24/7 at sea for a good portion of the year.

  25. Re:What? No backup systems? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    One of my friends back then was a Quartermaster's Mate, which is how I know this stuff. When we went from Pearl to Subic Bay, our last leg was from Guam, after refueling. For dead reckoning, they used 2000 yards per nautical mile (rounded down) and all turns were treated as point turns, ignoring the distance traveled in the turn itself. When we made landfall, our calculated position was off by less than 2 nmi. I wonder how many of today's navigators could do so well.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  26. Learn How Things Work by cstacy · · Score: 1

    When they remotely infected that ship,
    was the wek password 16309, or 123456?