Slashdot Mirror


Germany Refuses To Ban Huawei, Citing Lack of Real Evidence (phys.org)

hackingbear writes: Germany's IT watchdog has expressed skepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schoenbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence. The U.S. has been pressuring German authorities for months to drop Huawei, according to people familiar with the matter, but the Germans have asked for more specific evidence to demonstrate the security threat. German authorities and telecom executives have yet to turn up any evidence of security problems with Chinese equipment vendors, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Separately, at a (secret lobster-themed) meeting in Canada in July 2018, espionage chiefs from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K. and the U.S. -- all signatories to a treaty on signals intelligence, and often referred to as the "Five Eyes" -- agreed to do their best to contain the global growth of Chinese telecom (vendor) Huawei, the Australian Financial Review reported (paywalled). On the other hand, documents leaked by WikiLeaks and Snowden claimed that the NSA, the leader of the Five Eyes, tapped German Chancellery for decades and bugged routers made by Cisco, the leading American networking equipment vendor.

127 comments

  1. Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Editors, EDIT !!!!!!!

    1. Re:Which German ? by Desler · · Score: 1

      The German. Duuuh.

    2. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German. Duuuh.

      Damn, you guys beat me to it.

      I wonder if they'll ever fix this headline.

    3. Re: Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh geez, are there any sections of the newspaper that have serious headlines any more? Merry fuckin Christmas

    4. Re: Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they did not use their security auditor properly, nor did they compensate the auditors firm. So really they have no clue and since this will be profitable for the German economy they refuse to let the auditor meet with the analyst, which is in the end far worse for the germangivernment

    5. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler!

    6. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hitler!

      Hitler was Austrian.

      There are even photos of him as a child feeding a kangaroo.

    7. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he being beaten simultaneously with a polar penguin, as was tradition in Germany during that time? That would explain everything!

    8. Re:Which German ? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Was he being beaten simultaneously with a polar penguin, as was tradition in Germany during that time?

      Too bad your silly little retort joke failed because you used "polar" instead of "Arctic".

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    9. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polar bears, polar penguins.. When there are too many choices, you reach below, throw it and see what sticks. This is /. and we are busy with our lives, after all.

    10. Re:Which German ? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Ze German.

      FTFY

  2. At least Germany has sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise it's "me too" all over again.

  3. Canadian meeting by bigwill666 · · Score: 2

    Was the meeting in Canada a secret? Or was the lobster theme the secret? And also, what is a lobster themed meeting anyway?

    1. Re:Canadian meeting by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Geez, obviously the theme of the meeting was secret lobsters.

      But they can't tell you why the lobsters are secret. That's also secret.

    2. Re:Canadian meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn Newfies and their lobsters.

    3. Re:Canadian meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody should know how good the lobsters are in a Canadian restaurant only know by the participants of this meeting. There is just not enough for everybody. Just like facts about Huawei.

    4. Re:Canadian meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they looked like Dr Zoidberg, only with five eyes.

    5. Re:Canadian meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] And also, what is a lobster themed meeting anyway?

      Plus-sized hoes give lap dances.

    6. Re:Canadian meeting by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Some lobsters migrate for hundreds of miles while holding hands.

      Some lobsters have secrets.

      Secret lobsters have even more secrets.

      This is totally going to be a best-selling ebook when I get done.

  4. And why not? by beep54 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While using any foreign tech does have an element of risk, asking for some proof does not seem out of line.

    1. Re: And why not? by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Five Eyes are concerned, not because the Chinese might spy, but because the Chinese equipment does not enable *them* to spy.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:And why not? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unlike the US, Germany has laws, and not a President that can order nonsense.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:And why not? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hahahahahahahahhahahahhahah.

      Oh god please tell me you aren't serious!

      The US got caught monitoring Angela Merkel's phone and you call the Germans crappy allies!

    4. Re: And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over yourself

    5. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil." = You are a moron.

    6. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is full of muzz and globalist shitheads.

    7. Re:And why not? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Just come out and say what you mean in plain words. Just be honest and say Jew instead of your "globalist" dog whistle.

    8. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean Germany is the only country that has tried to go to war with the whole entire world... TWICE.

      And Angela is a new type of nazi, a feminazi.

      I kid I kid. (Apologies to norm MacDonald)

    9. Re:And why not? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The BND is always happy to work with the NSA and GCHQ. When it was for West German. Now as Germany.
      The German esprit de corps in its elite mil/police units is with always the USA, not with any random German gov/mil.
      The CIA and NSA always looked after generations of post ww2 German staff to a much better standard than any West German and later German gov/mil did.

      Why? Most West German gov and parts of the West German mil spied for East Germany, the Soviet Union.
      So the NSA always ensured its "Germans" after WW2 stayed totally loyal to the USA, not any "West" and later "German" political system.
      Any "German" gov can pass "laws", the BND will always respond to the NSA and GCHQ first.

      The same goes for most of the other clandestine German gov units.
      The USA worked on building loyalty to the USA in the German mil for decades. Starting in West Germany and now in Germany.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Jews that were rounded up and exterminated.

    11. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austria isn't Germany.

    12. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allies? Don't make me laugh, the US don't have allies, they have subjects.

    13. Re: And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eheh. You think the US is any different. Al the big GLOBAL companies own the US through shell companies

    14. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WWI and WWII Germany's situation was not comparable.

      In WWII Germany invaded a bunch of places.

      In WII, a Serbian murdered the Austrian head of state, then Austria declared war on Serbia. Then, Russia declared war on Austria. THEN Germany was asked to help to save Austria from the Russians. Only then, France and England declared war on Germany and Co. WWI Germany was only carrying out their defensive obligations as per their alliance with Austria, and had no role in starting the war.

    15. Re:And why not? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      Germany is free to import what they want from Iran, the problem is more US parent oil companies restricting what private companies can do.

      Germany doesn't want to "keep pumping oil", they don't want to be a victim of the orangegutan's holy war by means of rising petrol prices. Non-US based oil companies are still happily importing Iranian oil.

      Accusing them of being a leech is either hypocrisy or an incredible display of ignorance.

    16. Re:And why not? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huawei has spent a lot of money on independent code audits, and allows certain people to view the source code themselves (mainly government orgs and very large customers). What has Cisco done, other than get hit with literally hundreds of critical vulnerabilities, often backdoor accounts and hard coded passwords?

      At least Huawei are trying. We know for a fact that the NSA targets Cisco gear and they have done very little about it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:And why not? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

    18. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

      Simple question - would you really like to live in a world where Serbians can just murder Archdukes whenever they feel like it?

    19. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the fallacy of constrained choice, where the options are either (a) murdering an archduke leads to a war costing millions of lives or (b) people can murder archdukes with impunity. I think I'd like to live in world (c), where murdering an archduke results in prosecution under the law (and maybe, if refusal to extradite makes prosecution impossible, then a plausibly deniable killing by a secret agent).

    20. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is not an ally. They are a vassal state, and need to know their place. They lost, its the life of losers.

    21. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      Errm, you mean like any other country apart from the US and Israel? Because nobody believes the bullshit claims about Iran. Not because of the oil, but because of the facts.

      Or did you mean the war against Iraq, where Germany refused to join because they said there was no evidence? And it later turned out there really was no evidence, but all just a bunch of lies by the US.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    22. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

      The other heads of states of Europe and their military also wanted a war. Every single one. Because they all thought that they could easily win that war. Don't fucking pretend.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    23. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      PS: Germany gets more oil from the US than from Iran. and the US is way down on the list. So much for that dumb theory.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    24. Re: And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Five Eyes are concerned, not because the Chinese might spy, but because the Chinese equipment does not enable *them* to spy.

      That's a cheap shot at the US, not an insightful comment. To suggest that China is not spying is dumb.

    25. Re: And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To suggest that the US isn't is even dumber.

    26. Re: And why not? by saider · · Score: 1

      I only suggested that their primary concern is not necessarily defense.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    27. Re: And why not? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      What you mean... they can always upload ddwrt or tomato?

    28. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know better than to think a code audit finds deliberate malfeasance by the owner of the code...

  5. It's a network design question. by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What would happen if you route the traffic through your network in a way that it always goes from a Huawei to a Cisco and from a Cisco to a Huawei? Will now the NSA know what the Chinese are spying at, and the Chinese get all the INTEL NSA is looking for?

    Or will the Huawei block all steganographically embedded traffic to the NSA, while the Cisco deflects all secret traffic to the Chinese Ministry of State Security?

    What a conundrum!

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
    1. Re:It's a network design question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plot Twist:Cisco routers are made in China. Also all the computers and electronics. But this isn't a problem for the oligarchy so..gotta contain that cell phone competition.

    2. Re:It's a network design question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Throw a Checkpoint in the middle of the two for added fun.

    3. Re: It's a network design question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Martians attack? Isnâ(TM)t the article about the need for real evidence?

    4. Re:It's a network design question. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Think of how the NSA and GCHQ could spy globally in the 1950-1980's.
      All about GCHQ locations in Africa, around America, Europe, Asia.
      Thats what Communist China wants, a start to its own global collect it all reach.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re: It's a network design question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can visually compare the silicon in Cisco routers to they masks. Not do much for Huawei. We know they're a puppet, the only question is if the compromise is in firmware yet to be updated or in microcode.

    6. Re:It's a network design question. by hawk · · Score: 1

      This was already addressed in the Beijing Times article, which *somehow* ran the story several hours before any of the German news sources, or even the press release! :)

      hawk

  6. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the rest of the United States' foreign policy.

  7. But the US Intelligence Community said so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were right with Iraq WMDs, Trump's planted collusion, etc!!

  8. T-Mobile / Sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this scuttle the T-mobile merger with Sprint?

  9. It is about the future - not right now. by willy_me · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem that Huawei potentially brings is that the Chinese government could force them to embed spying functions into future firmware updates. Such a move would be difficult to counter once a country is highly reliant on Huawei for providing cell services. I am not suggesting that Huawei wants to so - but the Chinese government could easily dictate that they do so. In most other countries such requests would be challenged in court. For example, like how Apple refused to unlock a shooters iPhone a couple of years back. In China, we would never even know.

    1. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the same applies to cisco . the us government also has the power to order backdoors. so what is exactly the argument against huawei ? at least it seems they dont leave accidental backdoors, like cisco seems to do

    2. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      We know for a fact that the US already does that. The NSA intercepts Cisco gear being shipped, installs its own malware under the OS so that it survives updates and is very hard to detect, and then sends it on to the victim. No courts involved, we only found out thanks to Snowden.

      Maybe we should be buying NEC network gear. Maybe the Japanese government has it's hooks in it, but at least they seem fairly benign.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Maybe we should be buying NEC network gear. Maybe the Japanese government has it's hooks in it, but at least they seem fairly benign."

      Japan, like so many other nations, is the USA's bitch. They're not permitted to have a meaningful military, and their nation hosts many of our forces... Can't trust them either. What we need is open network equipment, both hard and soft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      An interesting post, however Apple did not refuse to unlock the shooters phone (they provided all the cloud data they had except the keys they didn't have), but refused to implement a backdoor so that any apple phone can be unlocked on government request - a significant difference.

    5. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      The suggestion that Huawei is somehow more likely to have this happen to them than Cisco, Qualcomm, or other US-based telecommunication companies, is farcical.

  10. Nice one by 2ms · · Score: 0

    I like the little remark at the end implying that since the US spied on someone then no one should do anything the try to contain anyone else from spying. As if it would be best to have a communist totalitarian government that imprisons thousands of innocent people a year be conducting intelligence operations and no one else.

    1. Re:Nice one by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The NSA doesn't care about Chinese spying. They care about people using network gear they can't get a foothold in.

      There are dozens of Snowden files on these topics.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "totalitarian government that imprisons thousands of innocent people a year be [sic] conducting intelligence operations"

      Why yes the USA is a pack of cunts.

      Next question?

    3. Re:Nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that kid that got locked up at the border and died was such a criminal.

    4. Re:Nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, sounds like the USA who just happen to have the largest prison population per head of capita in the world.

      The US talks its self up big time, but the truth is its a shithole.

    5. Re:Nice one by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      The NSA doesn't care about Chinese spying.

      Since when? Espionage is definitely better when only you have it. Caring about foreign entities spying is literally half of their job.

      They care about people using network gear they can't get a foothold in.

      Doubtful. They've always been able to lean on the peering providers so they can tap the big fat pipes regardless of who's routers are in use.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many heads per capita does the USA have anyway?

    7. Re:Nice one by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the NSA does care about Chinese spying, if only because it justifies their behaviour.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the NSA has people who know how to use a fuzzer.

  11. Indeed. Should demand source code by aberglas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We should be demanding source code for all of our telecom gear, regardless of where it is made. And to be able to build from that source.

    Nobody will be understand the Chinese source, but at least it makes it possible to prove hacks after they have been found.

  12. Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a trade boycott, preventing critical mass, simple as that. If H gets away, from its current leading position. that entire high value added techsector will belong to the Chinese, much like Flat screens TV's went to Korea, Aerospace America, While Cisco and some high tech Americal comms firms have been rocked with confirmed CVE's that is more red-handed than the Chinese and in decline path, and certainly brand names tarnished..

    At least the Germans are honest - show us the proof. Or is it more Bloomberg makeup? H has already agreed to have an open spec to big customers - to be met with 'we dont know and dont want to know'.

    Predicably teh Chinese will double down on this, given Trumps firing shots.
    Best bang for buck , plus a 25% US dollar appreciation means club USA jawboning
    will not work. If H wants to stir the pot, it should move some factories to India or Saudi.

    1. Re:Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans are very heavily invested in China - machinery, trains, industrial equipment, tech. You cannot stab your biggest trading partner in the face because the US says so. Krupp, Siemens, etc making money again comes first. All while the homeland is being invaded by 'refugees', but we don't talk about that.

    2. Re: Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many large corporations in the USA also invest heavily in China.

    3. Re:Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that happens when the US imposes tariffs on those goods. If you get pushed away by one trade parter other trade partners may become more attractive. Like China or Russia (fossil fuels).

      And yeah, the refugees. Admittedly, the entire affair was handled badly by the government. And Merkel ought to step down as Chancellor. But the media blows the entire thing way out of proportion. In fact overall crime is down and has been on a decline for some time, despite the media reporting every fart an immigrant takes out of order.
      You know why they do that? Because the fear based morons like you eat it up like "warme Semmeln". Each one of those articles brings millions of clicks, makes the ratings skyrocket on TV. Makes the advertising that is broadcasted and linked in articles very valuable.
      Remember the 'New Years Eve Rapes'? Turned out that most of the thing was staged by the media, with alleged victims who haven't even been there that night. And ever since then it's been fine to report overly negative about refugees. And since the free press still exists in this country they can continue to do it. And morons like you will craft their entire reality bubble around those issues. So yes, we talk about it often enough. You pretending that it is different is a blatant lie.
      A lot of those immigrant people are now crafty minimum wage labour slaves. Exactly what our industry wanted them to become. That is why they whispered in Merkel's ear and convinced here it was the humanitarian thing to do. They do many of the jobs uneducated people like you are too vain to do. They pay taxes. And their taxes pay the welfare for your unemployed asses. Education is practically free in Germany but the likes of you squander those opportunities, then complain when some foreigner takes advantage of those opportunities and takes the jobs you don't want to do. In the end those foreigners are more important and valuable to the German society than you. Just because you're born to German parents with a German heritage (Bio Deutsch is what they say) does not mean that you're useful. Apply yourself damnit!

    4. Re: Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep repeating what you're told to.

    5. Re: Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, keep up the refugees destroy Germany narrative. If it is too hard to face the issues caused by yourself, blame the others. Merkel did that long enough herself.

    6. Re:Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The Germans are very heavily invested in China - machinery, trains, industrial equipment, tech. You cannot stab your biggest trading partner in the face because the US says so.

      Errm, Germany`s biggest Export partner is the US. Wouldn't it make more sense to listen to the guys that make you money instead of those you pay money to?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  13. Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    You don't want them anywhere near your communications.

    Then again Apple and Google are also spies.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ummm...what the FUCK do I care if the Chinese government spy on my communications?
      What are they going to do to me?
      Fine me 100's of thousands of dollars for copyright infringement?
      Put me in jail for sharing a movie?
      Put me in Guantanamo for leaking information about corruption?
      How about the US government???
      Yeah, thanks, I think I'll still with Huiwei if that's ok with you!

    2. Re:Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...what the FUCK do I care if the Chinese government spy on my communications?

      If you ever plan on doing business with Chinese customers - or if some Chinese ever decides to compete with whatever you're doing for a living.

    3. Re:Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by jofas · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Google and Apple handsets are made in China, right?

  14. Germany defies the USA? by alexo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Angela Merkel should avoid connection flights via Toronto.
    Just saying.

    1. Re:Germany defies the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, more and more people are avoiding North America , the USA in particular.

      We also avoid US owned airlines. Going to Europe from New Zealand/Australia there are options though a range of other hubs that avoid the USA altogether.

  15. Germany's Social Castration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, people think that Germany was neutered after WW2. They think that the people there (and running the government) are completely different social and political animals than they were during the Weimar and Reich governments.

    BZZZT!

    WRONG!

    They're still the Big Plan, all or nothing, for your own good, top down, total control socio-fascists they've always been.

    They just exert themselves in different directions now.

    In current Internet political parlance, they're new bag is being "Pathologically Woke". Because being such gives them ample opportunity to virtue signal how much BETTER they are. How much more caring. How much more understanding. How much more tolerant (so long as you're not directly opposing their hideous social engineering push).

  16. Huawei Tablet by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 1

    I donâ(TM)t know, man.
    This is what my Huawei Tablets wants to do, if I merely want to use a networked android app:

    https://twitter.com/BramStolk/...

    Straight up evil, if you ask me.

    --
    Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
    1. Re:Huawei Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There were some articles that mentioned that the requirements are basically for their Cloud services. i.e. essentially like Apple's iCloud to simplify things for you.

      They even listed the kind of person info they collect (Huawei ID, IMEI, MEID, IMSI, MAC and IP address) , none of which need to be your real identity. Straight up evil? As evil as any big phone hardware company and less evil than most apps, if you ask me.

    2. Re:Huawei Tablet by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Right, but tablets aren't phones, they're just portable computers. Portable computers don't normally have any right to know any information about their user.

    3. Re: Huawei Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying other major tablets have better privacy policies? Now that you have mentioned that itâ(TM)s only a tablet, this looks like the evil company has just copied and pasted as unless itâ(TM)s got cell phone internet, it shouldnâ(TM)t have IMEI should it?

    4. Re:Huawei Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lost your tablet, would you still want to have a way to disable and remote wipe it?

    5. Re:Huawei Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I donâ(TM)t know, man. This is what my Huawei Tablets wants to do, if I merely want to use a networked android app:

      https://twitter.com/BramStolk/...

      Straight up evil, if you ask me.

      How is that any different from any other Android device?

  17. Cisco's spying behavior is the "real evidence" by billyswong · · Score: 1

    Since US government embedded spy module into Cisco network equipment, Huawei copycat, when pirating the Cisco stuff, copied the spy module and channeled that to Chinese government instead. So it's all a matter of choosing whose economy you want to support and whose spy department you want your communication to be tapped on. We can't escape.

    1. Re:Cisco's spying behavior is the "real evidence" by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well actually you can. You can demand, that your government, build a facility to manufacturer network equipment upon fully audited production lines, and the code all FOSS. Calling it essential infrastructure and demanding that it be free from any foreign control whether government or private. So all the network equipment required from inside you home out through all the ISPs, one brand for all, secured and audited. Secure form the worst predations of the US government or the minor inconveniences of the government of China.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  18. Hackingbear is a shill for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a break -- almost every submission from this person is anti-US/pro-China propaganda. Have a look for yourself:

    https://slashdot.org/~hackingbear/submissions

    1. Re: Hackingbear is a shill for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like pro Canadian lobsters to me

    2. Re:Hackingbear is a shill for China by famebait · · Score: 1

      Umm, so, is your point...
      a) that Germany's Federal Office for Information Security did not in fact issue such a statement?
      b) that phys.org did not in fact report on it?
      c) that those facts are somehow invalidated when someone you don't like links to them?
      d) that media like slashdot should refrain from reporting on events like these?

      I think that's a pretty exahaustive list of options.
      Interestingly, they all imply your're a complete moron.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    3. Re:Hackingbear is a shill for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows who issued what -- someone linked to an article that referenced another article saying something. Whether or not those are "facts" at this point is controversial. The original point remains -- Hackingbear is a shill for anti-US/pro-China propaganda.

      Also, if there is "proof", it's probable that it'd be classified and so not for public dissemination.

      Maybe learn how to use a spell checker next time ("your're") before calling someone else a moron.

    4. Re: Hackingbear is a shill for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he isnâ(TM)t an AC

  19. I wish our (kiwi) government had the balls too! by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

    Sadly we're to puny to have an opinion...

  20. Canadian Lobsters? by anwyn · · Score: 1

    Is this some kind of dig against Jordon Peterson?

  21. sure it does by johnjones · · Score: 2

    the Chinese equipment supports interception the same way other equipment makers do

    the problem is the network operators dont know how and when it might be enabled without them asking and with much of the SDN equipment the opportunity to detect it is reduced...

    everyone spy's on each other, its the very nature of the security posture that the world has adopted

  22. exactly the BND are sharing the same way EU does by johnjones · · Score: 1

    your spot on I find it hilarious anyone interested in privacy would choose Germany with what the BND can do they are pretty amazing !

  23. Same country that tried to cover-up the Holocaust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some things NEVER change.

  24. Yeah, those nasty eastern Germans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How dare they come over here and take our aid and jobs?

    Or was it those nasty Prussians, who came from Poland and Russia, to take our land?

    Maybe you mean those damn Romans, who brought their culture? What did they ever do for us?

    No, wait, of course you mean the Africans and Middle-Easterners, who invaded us, and took our land and women! Fuck homo sapiens! Neanderthal to the neanderthals!!

    1. Re:Yeah, those nasty eastern Germans! by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      You have your point, however you should check the history, otherwise the made mistakes undermines your otherwise insightful post.

  25. The USA still *is* at war with everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It still has racism, nationalism, literal torture camps, fascists ("neocons") ruling, and a Hitler-substitute president.

    It also hired all the Nazi scientists and concentration-camp doctors, etc, after the war.

    And was the only cuntry to ever nuke another country.
    Anf has been perpeutally at "not"-war anf usig others as proxies/puppets since back then, with no pause.
    Meddling with literally ALL the countries.
    Going so far as to openly brag about manipulating th Russian electiony to get fat dancing bear Yeltsin elected, who then put Putin in power, so you have a convenient new scapegoat in your closet, to distract your literally mentally retarded brainwashed slave worker livestock population.

    The USA is the only surviving one of the NAZI countries!

  26. A lot of US refugees in Germany. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see soo many US-Americans coming here (to Cologne), that it looks like when German scientists fled to the US before WWII, in reverse.

    I guess they can smell that shit will go down too.

    I wonder who will take on the USA though. And especially without global thermonuclear war.
    China? Russia? Or the EU leaving its vassal status? They all do not sound realistic.

    Then again, US intelligence "experts" stated that Germany is the factor that tips the whole scale of the EU between siding with the US or with "Russia" (They mean: Not USA. Nobody here wants to be with Russia either.)
    Which usually leads to Ukraine-like scenarios, where the population can vote beween a russian puppet and a US puppet, while both breed terrorists (like the Swoboda or AfD) to scaremonger them into making the "right" choice.

  27. It's Chiina! by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Red danger! (purely ideological shit... New Cold War?)

  28. Chinese over American. Any day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the evidence is on the table. The Americans have been proven to spy on allies, breach and sabotage their networks, and to subvert their own communication equipment before selling to the world. But no evidence of China doing this has ever been presented. None. There have only ever been baseless accusations.

    And given the U.S. track record of killing and murdering in foreign countries to get what it wants, over-throwing democratically elected governments, and more, China are saints in comparison. Even if China DID spy, I would probably trust them more with my browsing history than the paranoid and murderous Americans.

    It's clear that the U.S. actions towards Huawei are entirely politically and financially motivated. Their own spyware companies, Cisco and Juniper most notably, are losing market to Huawei, and the U.S. can as a consequence not spy on foreign countries as easily, and so they are now scrambling to attack Huawei in any way they can.

    American financial and political terrorism is what this is.

  29. There are no problems with Huawei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These problems are fake, imaggined, propaganda to prevent you from choosing a backdoor-free phone. I might buy my next phone from Huawei since obviously it's missing NSA backdoors. Why else would it get all this hate? Maybe just because it's associated with china, perhaps. But I feel that it's a solid choice either way. I'll have to do more research into their phones soon.

  30. Re:Indeed. Should demand source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should be demanding source code for all of our telecom gear, regardless of where it is made.

    So use general-purpose computers as routers then. Run linux on them - you have the whole source and may audit the networking stack as much as you like.

  31. The funniest part is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "lack of real evidence", what evidence? I thought the entire western think make believe fairly tail, the most trust-worthy-guy, and multiple accusation are as good as "real evidence". I can show you 100 American plus a trust-worthy-gal who supported my view, that Huawei is a slim ball, and spy. What, not "real" enough for you? How many do you need?

  32. Re:Indeed. Should demand source code by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people, even on Slashdot would be capable of reviewing, compiling code from source and ensuring it's free of back doors etc?

    That number is tiny.

  33. Bigger than the number for CISCO gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is kinda the point. Huawei gear is safer than Cisco gear. Simple mathematics.

    1. Re:Bigger than the number for CISCO gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people would look harder at Huawei, which is important. (For Cisco, it is not malicious code you worry about, merely grossly incompetent code.)

      If you just employ a security team to spend a few weeks looking at the code nothing will be found.

      But if you spend the money to have people work with the code continuously, then there is a good chance things would be found. And because of that Huawei would be very reluctant to put them in in the first place.

  34. Re:Indeed. Should demand source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One for sure would be Slashdot's own resident asshole Zero__Kelvin. I mean, he'll claim he can do it. He's got a lot of claims.

  35. Wrong Philosophy by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The correct philosophy is to assume YOU ARE ALREADY COMPROMISED.

  36. I don't know about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it like when Herr Biedermann invited the arsonists Schmitz and Eisenring to sleep in the attic.

  37. Re:Indeed. Should demand source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    General purpose operating systems are too slow to be core routers. I certainly advise people use a linux router at home rather than the crapware loaded into consumer level "routers", but you still pay a premium for the CPU/power required to do the job compared to the minuscule CPU in your WiFi modem/router/NAS/telephone.

  38. Re:exactly the BND are sharing the same way EU doe by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The West German creation story with the USA going back to Reinhard Gehlen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... should be well known.
    The USA needed non Communist it could trust with its spying and worked with the only spy ready West Germans it could trust.
    Thats what created and advanced generations of West German and now German spies, mil and gov officials.

    Advancement was only for Germans who show they will always put the USA/UK above their own gov.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"