Slashdot Mirror


Germany Refuses To Ban Huawei, Citing Lack of Real Evidence (phys.org)

hackingbear writes: Germany's IT watchdog has expressed skepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schoenbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence. The U.S. has been pressuring German authorities for months to drop Huawei, according to people familiar with the matter, but the Germans have asked for more specific evidence to demonstrate the security threat. German authorities and telecom executives have yet to turn up any evidence of security problems with Chinese equipment vendors, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Separately, at a (secret lobster-themed) meeting in Canada in July 2018, espionage chiefs from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K. and the U.S. -- all signatories to a treaty on signals intelligence, and often referred to as the "Five Eyes" -- agreed to do their best to contain the global growth of Chinese telecom (vendor) Huawei, the Australian Financial Review reported (paywalled). On the other hand, documents leaked by WikiLeaks and Snowden claimed that the NSA, the leader of the Five Eyes, tapped German Chancellery for decades and bugged routers made by Cisco, the leading American networking equipment vendor.

57 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Canadian meeting by bigwill666 · · Score: 2

    Was the meeting in Canada a secret? Or was the lobster theme the secret? And also, what is a lobster themed meeting anyway?

    1. Re:Canadian meeting by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Geez, obviously the theme of the meeting was secret lobsters.

      But they can't tell you why the lobsters are secret. That's also secret.

    2. Re:Canadian meeting by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Some lobsters migrate for hundreds of miles while holding hands.

      Some lobsters have secrets.

      Secret lobsters have even more secrets.

      This is totally going to be a best-selling ebook when I get done.

  2. Re:Which German ? by Desler · · Score: 1

    The German. Duuuh.

  3. And why not? by beep54 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While using any foreign tech does have an element of risk, asking for some proof does not seem out of line.

    1. Re: And why not? by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Five Eyes are concerned, not because the Chinese might spy, but because the Chinese equipment does not enable *them* to spy.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:And why not? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unlike the US, Germany has laws, and not a President that can order nonsense.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:And why not? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hahahahahahahahhahahahhahah.

      Oh god please tell me you aren't serious!

      The US got caught monitoring Angela Merkel's phone and you call the Germans crappy allies!

    4. Re:And why not? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Just come out and say what you mean in plain words. Just be honest and say Jew instead of your "globalist" dog whistle.

    5. Re:And why not? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The BND is always happy to work with the NSA and GCHQ. When it was for West German. Now as Germany.
      The German esprit de corps in its elite mil/police units is with always the USA, not with any random German gov/mil.
      The CIA and NSA always looked after generations of post ww2 German staff to a much better standard than any West German and later German gov/mil did.

      Why? Most West German gov and parts of the West German mil spied for East Germany, the Soviet Union.
      So the NSA always ensured its "Germans" after WW2 stayed totally loyal to the USA, not any "West" and later "German" political system.
      Any "German" gov can pass "laws", the BND will always respond to the NSA and GCHQ first.

      The same goes for most of the other clandestine German gov units.
      The USA worked on building loyalty to the USA in the German mil for decades. Starting in West Germany and now in Germany.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:And why not? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      Germany is free to import what they want from Iran, the problem is more US parent oil companies restricting what private companies can do.

      Germany doesn't want to "keep pumping oil", they don't want to be a victim of the orangegutan's holy war by means of rising petrol prices. Non-US based oil companies are still happily importing Iranian oil.

      Accusing them of being a leech is either hypocrisy or an incredible display of ignorance.

    7. Re:And why not? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huawei has spent a lot of money on independent code audits, and allows certain people to view the source code themselves (mainly government orgs and very large customers). What has Cisco done, other than get hit with literally hundreds of critical vulnerabilities, often backdoor accounts and hard coded passwords?

      At least Huawei are trying. We know for a fact that the NSA targets Cisco gear and they have done very little about it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:And why not? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

    9. Re:And why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

      Simple question - would you really like to live in a world where Serbians can just murder Archdukes whenever they feel like it?

    10. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      Errm, you mean like any other country apart from the US and Israel? Because nobody believes the bullshit claims about Iran. Not because of the oil, but because of the facts.

      Or did you mean the war against Iraq, where Germany refused to join because they said there was no evidence? And it later turned out there really was no evidence, but all just a bunch of lies by the US.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    11. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Austria-Hungary only declared war (actually make a whole series of utterly unreasonable demands which if not met would lead to war) because it had the backing of Germany. The Kaiser could have told Austria-Hungry to got take a hike, but they wanted a war. Had Germany told Austria-Hungary to take a hike no war.

      The United Kingdom only entered the War because Germany decided to invade Belgium a neutral country which the UK had signed up to guarantee.

      The Kaiser and his Prussian mates in the German Army wanted a war and used the assassination as an excuse.

      The other heads of states of Europe and their military also wanted a war. Every single one. Because they all thought that they could easily win that war. Don't fucking pretend.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    12. Re:And why not? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Like when they tried to force the US to keep the Iran deal because they wanted to keep pumping oil.

      PS: Germany gets more oil from the US than from Iran. and the US is way down on the list. So much for that dumb theory.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    13. Re: And why not? by saider · · Score: 1

      I only suggested that their primary concern is not necessarily defense.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    14. Re: And why not? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      What you mean... they can always upload ddwrt or tomato?

  4. It's a network design question. by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What would happen if you route the traffic through your network in a way that it always goes from a Huawei to a Cisco and from a Cisco to a Huawei? Will now the NSA know what the Chinese are spying at, and the Chinese get all the INTEL NSA is looking for?

    Or will the Huawei block all steganographically embedded traffic to the NSA, while the Cisco deflects all secret traffic to the Chinese Ministry of State Security?

    What a conundrum!

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
    1. Re:It's a network design question. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Think of how the NSA and GCHQ could spy globally in the 1950-1980's.
      All about GCHQ locations in Africa, around America, Europe, Asia.
      Thats what Communist China wants, a start to its own global collect it all reach.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:It's a network design question. by hawk · · Score: 1

      This was already addressed in the Beijing Times article, which *somehow* ran the story several hours before any of the German news sources, or even the press release! :)

      hawk

  5. Re:Which German ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hitler!

    Hitler was Austrian.

    There are even photos of him as a child feeding a kangaroo.

  6. It is about the future - not right now. by willy_me · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem that Huawei potentially brings is that the Chinese government could force them to embed spying functions into future firmware updates. Such a move would be difficult to counter once a country is highly reliant on Huawei for providing cell services. I am not suggesting that Huawei wants to so - but the Chinese government could easily dictate that they do so. In most other countries such requests would be challenged in court. For example, like how Apple refused to unlock a shooters iPhone a couple of years back. In China, we would never even know.

    1. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      We know for a fact that the US already does that. The NSA intercepts Cisco gear being shipped, installs its own malware under the OS so that it survives updates and is very hard to detect, and then sends it on to the victim. No courts involved, we only found out thanks to Snowden.

      Maybe we should be buying NEC network gear. Maybe the Japanese government has it's hooks in it, but at least they seem fairly benign.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Maybe we should be buying NEC network gear. Maybe the Japanese government has it's hooks in it, but at least they seem fairly benign."

      Japan, like so many other nations, is the USA's bitch. They're not permitted to have a meaningful military, and their nation hosts many of our forces... Can't trust them either. What we need is open network equipment, both hard and soft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      An interesting post, however Apple did not refuse to unlock the shooters phone (they provided all the cloud data they had except the keys they didn't have), but refused to implement a backdoor so that any apple phone can be unlocked on government request - a significant difference.

    4. Re:It is about the future - not right now. by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      The suggestion that Huawei is somehow more likely to have this happen to them than Cisco, Qualcomm, or other US-based telecommunication companies, is farcical.

  7. Indeed. Should demand source code by aberglas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We should be demanding source code for all of our telecom gear, regardless of where it is made. And to be able to build from that source.

    Nobody will be understand the Chinese source, but at least it makes it possible to prove hacks after they have been found.

  8. Re:Nice one by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The NSA doesn't care about Chinese spying. They care about people using network gear they can't get a foothold in.

    There are dozens of Snowden files on these topics.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    You don't want them anywhere near your communications.

    Then again Apple and Google are also spies.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ummm...what the FUCK do I care if the Chinese government spy on my communications?
      What are they going to do to me?
      Fine me 100's of thousands of dollars for copyright infringement?
      Put me in jail for sharing a movie?
      Put me in Guantanamo for leaking information about corruption?
      How about the US government???
      Yeah, thanks, I think I'll still with Huiwei if that's ok with you!

    2. Re:Huiwei=ChiComm Government Spy by jofas · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Google and Apple handsets are made in China, right?

  10. Germany defies the USA? by alexo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Angela Merkel should avoid connection flights via Toronto.
    Just saying.

  11. Huawei Tablet by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 1

    I donâ(TM)t know, man.
    This is what my Huawei Tablets wants to do, if I merely want to use a networked android app:

    https://twitter.com/BramStolk/...

    Straight up evil, if you ask me.

    --
    Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
    1. Re:Huawei Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There were some articles that mentioned that the requirements are basically for their Cloud services. i.e. essentially like Apple's iCloud to simplify things for you.

      They even listed the kind of person info they collect (Huawei ID, IMEI, MEID, IMSI, MAC and IP address) , none of which need to be your real identity. Straight up evil? As evil as any big phone hardware company and less evil than most apps, if you ask me.

    2. Re:Huawei Tablet by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Right, but tablets aren't phones, they're just portable computers. Portable computers don't normally have any right to know any information about their user.

  12. Cisco's spying behavior is the "real evidence" by billyswong · · Score: 1

    Since US government embedded spy module into Cisco network equipment, Huawei copycat, when pirating the Cisco stuff, copied the spy module and channeled that to Chinese government instead. So it's all a matter of choosing whose economy you want to support and whose spy department you want your communication to be tapped on. We can't escape.

    1. Re:Cisco's spying behavior is the "real evidence" by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well actually you can. You can demand, that your government, build a facility to manufacturer network equipment upon fully audited production lines, and the code all FOSS. Calling it essential infrastructure and demanding that it be free from any foreign control whether government or private. So all the network equipment required from inside you home out through all the ISPs, one brand for all, secured and audited. Secure form the worst predations of the US government or the minor inconveniences of the government of China.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  13. I wish our (kiwi) government had the balls too! by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

    Sadly we're to puny to have an opinion...

  14. Canadian Lobsters? by anwyn · · Score: 1

    Is this some kind of dig against Jordon Peterson?

  15. sure it does by johnjones · · Score: 2

    the Chinese equipment supports interception the same way other equipment makers do

    the problem is the network operators dont know how and when it might be enabled without them asking and with much of the SDN equipment the opportunity to detect it is reduced...

    everyone spy's on each other, its the very nature of the security posture that the world has adopted

  16. exactly the BND are sharing the same way EU does by johnjones · · Score: 1

    your spot on I find it hilarious anyone interested in privacy would choose Germany with what the BND can do they are pretty amazing !

  17. Re:Hackingbear is a shill for China by famebait · · Score: 1

    Umm, so, is your point...
    a) that Germany's Federal Office for Information Security did not in fact issue such a statement?
    b) that phys.org did not in fact report on it?
    c) that those facts are somehow invalidated when someone you don't like links to them?
    d) that media like slashdot should refrain from reporting on events like these?

    I think that's a pretty exahaustive list of options.
    Interestingly, they all imply your're a complete moron.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  18. Re:Nice one by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    The NSA doesn't care about Chinese spying.

    Since when? Espionage is definitely better when only you have it. Caring about foreign entities spying is literally half of their job.

    They care about people using network gear they can't get a foothold in.

    Doubtful. They've always been able to lean on the peering providers so they can tap the big fat pipes regardless of who's routers are in use.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  19. Yeah, those nasty eastern Germans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How dare they come over here and take our aid and jobs?

    Or was it those nasty Prussians, who came from Poland and Russia, to take our land?

    Maybe you mean those damn Romans, who brought their culture? What did they ever do for us?

    No, wait, of course you mean the Africans and Middle-Easterners, who invaded us, and took our land and women! Fuck homo sapiens! Neanderthal to the neanderthals!!

    1. Re:Yeah, those nasty eastern Germans! by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      You have your point, however you should check the history, otherwise the made mistakes undermines your otherwise insightful post.

  20. The USA still *is* at war with everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It still has racism, nationalism, literal torture camps, fascists ("neocons") ruling, and a Hitler-substitute president.

    It also hired all the Nazi scientists and concentration-camp doctors, etc, after the war.

    And was the only cuntry to ever nuke another country.
    Anf has been perpeutally at "not"-war anf usig others as proxies/puppets since back then, with no pause.
    Meddling with literally ALL the countries.
    Going so far as to openly brag about manipulating th Russian electiony to get fat dancing bear Yeltsin elected, who then put Putin in power, so you have a convenient new scapegoat in your closet, to distract your literally mentally retarded brainwashed slave worker livestock population.

    The USA is the only surviving one of the NAZI countries!

  21. It's Chiina! by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Red danger! (purely ideological shit... New Cold War?)

  22. Chinese over American. Any day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the evidence is on the table. The Americans have been proven to spy on allies, breach and sabotage their networks, and to subvert their own communication equipment before selling to the world. But no evidence of China doing this has ever been presented. None. There have only ever been baseless accusations.

    And given the U.S. track record of killing and murdering in foreign countries to get what it wants, over-throwing democratically elected governments, and more, China are saints in comparison. Even if China DID spy, I would probably trust them more with my browsing history than the paranoid and murderous Americans.

    It's clear that the U.S. actions towards Huawei are entirely politically and financially motivated. Their own spyware companies, Cisco and Juniper most notably, are losing market to Huawei, and the U.S. can as a consequence not spy on foreign countries as easily, and so they are now scrambling to attack Huawei in any way they can.

    American financial and political terrorism is what this is.

  23. Re:Indeed. Should demand source code by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people, even on Slashdot would be capable of reviewing, compiling code from source and ensuring it's free of back doors etc?

    That number is tiny.

  24. Re:Nice one by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the NSA does care about Chinese spying, if only because it justifies their behaviour.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  25. Re:Trade War Tech Sector Tactics by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    The Germans are very heavily invested in China - machinery, trains, industrial equipment, tech. You cannot stab your biggest trading partner in the face because the US says so.

    Errm, Germany`s biggest Export partner is the US. Wouldn't it make more sense to listen to the guys that make you money instead of those you pay money to?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  26. Re:Which German ? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Was he being beaten simultaneously with a polar penguin, as was tradition in Germany during that time?

    Too bad your silly little retort joke failed because you used "polar" instead of "Arctic".

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  27. Wrong Philosophy by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The correct philosophy is to assume YOU ARE ALREADY COMPROMISED.

  28. Re:Which German ? by fisted · · Score: 1

    Ze German.

    FTFY

  29. Re:exactly the BND are sharing the same way EU doe by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The West German creation story with the USA going back to Reinhard Gehlen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... should be well known.
    The USA needed non Communist it could trust with its spying and worked with the only spy ready West Germans it could trust.
    Thats what created and advanced generations of West German and now German spies, mil and gov officials.

    Advancement was only for Germans who show they will always put the USA/UK above their own gov.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"