Slashdot Mirror
Tumblr Blocked Archivists Just Before Starting the NSFW Content Purge (techdirt.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt: By now, of course, you're aware that the Verizon-owned Tumblr (which was bought by Yahoo, which was bought by Verizon and merged into "Oath" with AOL and other no longer relevant properties) has suddenly decided that nothing sexy is allowed on its servers. This took many by surprise because apparently a huge percentage of Tumblr was used by people to post somewhat racy content. Knowing that a bunch of content was about to disappear, the famed Archive Team sprung into action -- as they've done many times in the past. They set out to archive as much of the content on Tumblr that was set to be disappeared down the memory hole as possible... and it turns out that Verizon decided as a final "fuck you" to cut them off. Jason Scott, the mastermind behind the Archive Team announced over the weekend that Verizon appeared to be blocking their IPs. Thankfully, it didn't take long for the Archive Team to get past the blocks. Scott tweeted on Sunday: "why look at that the archiving of tumblr restarted how did that happen must be a bug surely a crack team of activist archivists didn't see an ip block as a small setback and then turned everything up to 11."
Huh? this is the most incomprehensible sentence since "Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?". Do I just need mode Covfefe?
Oh yeah I know: Pornhub, Youporn, Xvideos...
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Creimer went to a Shake Shack and only had a strawberry milkshake.
This article has about as much content as a mainstream print magazine. So many words, so little message. All I got out of this was, "People are angry about lack of porn backup. They're going to try and do something about it. Film at 11." Wake me up please, when "turned it up to 11" actually means something was accomplished.
Use a little common sense once in a while. --Book of Mooch Ch. 5 verse 14
Yes, the internet archive should be allowed to archive ALL AND EVERYTHING FOR ETERNITY
Without ever having to delete anything.
Clearly you wishing to make it easier makes you one of those shady individuals who has illegal activities to hide.
captcha : aliases
OK. In a legal battle between legitimate archival of content, and the laws governing unauthorized computer system access, which one wins?
It is quite clear that Verizon DID NOT authorize the archivists to archive the data prior to the mass purge, as evidenced by the imposition of the IP blocking. As such, there is a strong case to be made that Archive.org was in contravention of the CFAA, and the workaround could be said to be a technical means of circumvention of that restriction of access (and thus, technically 'hacking', even though I REALLY hate to use such a word for such a simple solution.)
It is also quite clear that there is a cultural asset that was going to be removed, purely for PR reasons by Verizon-- which was in need of preservation, and the Archive.org folks acted to accomplish that preservation.
So... Which wins here? Just curious.
Good idea.
Let the dictators write the history books.
You might be surprised how valuable tumblr might be to future historians and anthropologists.
The bullshit, and moronic things that people do with cameras and the like, are a valuable window in the the currently modern era. That it was uncensored, uncurated, and unabashed-- means it is of the MOST value to such future generations of historians-- It is free from the associated biases those practices append.
My name is GayPK and I'm gay!! Woooooooo!
I love 8=======D. I said I loooooooooove 8========D
They'll be gone just like the new myspace...
If you shoot your fans, they usually don't come back. at least not in the same traffic.
but maybe that was the point, a puritan company bought a product to kill.
What an utter fucking waste of bandwidth and storage.
The weirdos who started BSD once had one kernel. Then they kept fighting with each other until it was split between a half-dozen incompatible kernels. But of all the fragments, I'd say NetBSD is the worst. It is so far behind the times that it will never catch up. Some subsystems are sort of current, others are ancient and full of bit rot. And really, the number of real users of NetBSD can be counted as maybe 100 or 200 max. Bad shit, amigo. Bad shit.
I don't see a any noteworthy difference between sexual exploitation and non-sexual exploitation. Some people get more upset about sexual issues than about other issues, because sex is still taboo in most societies and thinking about sex in the US is strongly influenced by Puritanism. The exaggerated concern about sexual issues is irrational and in some cases also very hypocritical. There is nothing wrong with sex, there is nothing wrong with masturbating and there is nothing wrong with pornography produced by consenting adult actors. And there is certainly nothing wrong with "female-presenting nipples". Moral outrage about these issues mostly indicates a certain lack of maturity.
Now exploitation, that's a bad thing, or at least it sounds bad to me. We can agree on that. But that's a separate discussion.
It should be the case that they get express permission from a site owner before archiving a site.
Or make it far easier than it currently is for a site to be deleted from the Archive.
Plenty of sleazy journos who want to stealth-edit their articles agree with you.
In the old days, the internet was built on protocols. "Social media" mostly meant things like Usenet and IRC, and people hosted websites by spinning up an Apache instance that spoke HTTP and would serve their content to anyone who asked. And so there was never that big of a stink about censorship-by-nonprovision-of-services, since anyone could run an IRC server. Communities themselves were responsible for their own infrastructure. Don't like a particular IRC client? Use a different one. Don't like the folks who run a particular IRC server? Run your own.
But now that "I have apache running on a linux box in my basement hosting my blog" has given way to these "services", where communication platforms usually involve a for-profit company running all the infrastructure themselves in an opaque way. Aside from all the other issues that come from a corporate advertising-supported model, people are now learning that you can't trust these companies. The people I know who use tumblr as a primary means of communication are all going "gee, I wonder who else we can trust? We thought we could trust these folks."
But ... this isn't inevitable, and there's no reason that the next big thing in social networking can't be designed as an open protocol, with no central point of control -- a system where people may choose to provide the infrastructure required to power their Facegram or Instabook or whatever themselves, or (more likely) hire someone replaceable to do it for them. Open protocols can't be sold out and can't be owned.
Hardware capability is through the roof now. My smartphone has more storage, more processing power, and more bandwidth than the machines hosting IRC servers not that many years ago. There are no technical barriers to crowd-hosted social media.
a valuable window into the^W the currently^W modern era
Haha good god this is the sloppiest sentence I've ever seen
(append??? WTF)
people hosted websites by spinning up an Apache instance that spoke HTTP and would serve their content to anyone who asked. And so there was never that big of a stink about censorship-by-nonprovision-of-services
How did people become "anyone who asked" in the first place?
there's no reason that the next big thing in social networking can't be designed as an open protocol, with no central point of control
The IndieWeb community is trying to build a more protocol-centric social web. Each IndieWeb user registers a domain and buys hosting to hold his or her own posts, and IndieWeb sites use Webmention requests (similar to pingbacks) to notify other sites that replies have been posted. Right now, the biggest missing piece of IndieWeb is a recommendation engine to suggest related works by other authors.
Hardware capability is through the roof now.
IPv4 address space, by contrast, is not. Nor is IPv6 routing; I haven't seen evidence that an IPv6-only website can become successful in gaining and keeping readers.
My smartphone has more storage, more processing power, and more bandwidth than the machines hosting IRC servers not that many years ago.
But it's missing one thing: the ability to accept incoming connections on IPv4. Most cellular ISPs put their subscribers behind carrier-grade NAT, as do even home ISPs in some countries. These ISPs give the same public IP address to a whole neighborhood and will refuse to forward inbound port 443 on your neighborhood's IP address to your machine.
And around the same time Facebook prohibits even the slightest sexual innuendo. Is this all coincidence or is it a response to the SESTA?
From Webster:
append verb
apÂâpend | \É(TM)-Ëpend
\
appended; appending; appends
Definition of append
transitive verb
1 : attach, affix appended a diagram to the instructions
2 : to add as a supplement or appendix (as in a book) notes appended to each chapter
In context--- The practices of censorship, curation, or social taboo attach additional biases to content that is otherwise free of those biases.
Simply because your English parsing function got offended, does not mean you should turn off your brain sir.
Found the asshole social just-us nazi!
This is still puritan thinking.
Where is "they"? Let's beat "them" up!
If you wanna talk about sloppy, let's talk about your mom
I disagree. It's a massive amount of volume that doesn't really depict the real world at all. The real world looks nothing like what these 'influencers' or whatever depict.
Or make it far easier than it currently is for a site to be deleted from the Archive.
archive.org retroactively honors robots.txt. How much easier do you want?
So what? :o)
It's only a "problem" if you assume that selling your body for sex is somehow worse than selling your body for manual labor (getting paid to dig ditches or run network cables) or selling your intellectual ability
It's not. It's the same thing. In a free society consenting adults can sell whatever they have.
Of course on this site "free society" and "libertarian" are the insults.
I don't respond to or upvote ACs
"why look at that the archiving of tumblr restarted how did that happen must be a bug surely a crack team of activist archivists didn't see an ip block as a small setback and then turned everything up to 11."
Oh my god, if that got any more smug it'd start selling Apple products.
That's your opinion. Mine is different, I see a clear distiction between those two, as I expressed above. So let's agree to differ.
Where does the archive team host the content now?
Asking for a friend.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
It was more akin to have a guard at the door telling people they would not be accepted in if they came from the direction from the local library, but it is open door for everybody else not coming from the direction of the library. Then the local librarian went past the house and came back from the other way and the guardsman left him in. Nothing illegal and nothing was broken.
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
Sell their body for sex?
Who pays for porn these days?
And that's pretty much the problem, who do you think is behind those bans? And have you noticed that the only places that get hit by bans like that are the places where you get porn for free?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Me too! I feel disadvantaged and underprivileged, nobody would give a dime to see me fuck!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
If this is about improving the working conditions of adult actors, then you can totally count me in. I've been for improved and free health care and social security not just for actors but also for sex workers during all my adult life so far. I also think there should be better mental health care for such professions (and paid leave, if necessary), because this kind of work is stressful.
What I don't get is why consuming porn makes you "greedy" and what makes this "a problem". As I've said, this view is irrational and based on silly old taboos and religious superstitions. Adult actors are mostly in it for money, not for fun, these jobs pay way more than you could ever earn in any low wage job, but also come with a high level of distress and social stigmatization because of silly taboos. So your comparison to low wage jobs is puzzling. Now if your opinion is that it's better if adult actors would work at McDonald's and therefore the working conditions at McDonald's ought to be improved, I'd say, okay, that's an opinion one could have although I still don't see the point of it.
Everybody should get a high enough salary to make a decent living under decent working conditions in any profession, so I'd focus on improving both kind of jobs.
Aw, come on! Don't underestimate fetishism.
"Only applies to un/important things, as decided by Our Betters."
This attitude seems benign in regard to what I too consider socnet drivel, but the same approach is used to arbitrarily axe, vilify, or even prosecute. Sometimes against a single person, sometimes upon a nation. Often it's Because Terrorists, Because Drugs, Think Of Children, etc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Infocalypse)
Let's say that big boy word again because it's The Point: arbitrarily
There needs to be some form of agreement what is meant to be persistent and what is meant to be ephemeral. The robots exclusion standard was a way of doing that, until the people at archive.org announced that they would ignore it and archive anyway. The alternative to a civilized agreement is that the majority of content will go "dark". Facebook is a good example of this. People no longer post their "blog" to the public. They mark everything private and only share with their friends. A radical archivist position means that there can be no ephemeral public information. As the stakes increase, many people find that they prefer to just take their communication private instead of living under the eternal scrutiny of having their online history archived. Radical archivists are killing the open web.
There was story yesterday about Facebook tracking location even after user opted-out of tracking.
Would this be in violation of the CFAA since they are using computer access to get information they were told not to get access to?
Could they be sued for this?
so you think that we can kill the demand by eliminating the supply? If so, i have a bridge to sell you! There is a reason that someone who sells their body for sex is one of the oldest professions in history, reducing the supply will only increase the demand as every other type of prohibition has always done.
Some people will always want to sell their bodies for sex as well, you should try talking to a sex worker, it may suprise you what their thoughts are on the matter. We definitly shouldnt be trying to make their minds up for them because the thing is that the majority of the consenting adults who perform in that industry could easily get other jobs and quite a few of them do have jobs and still do sex work because they like it and why not get paid for doing something you like.
As for your argument about their psyche, are you a doctor? do you think its fair to paint everyone with the same brush? After all, how can you say that some events are bad for their psyche when they believe they are in it voluntarily? EVERY event in our lives marks our psyche and you have just determined that those specific actions are bad, based on no evidence and without having any form of communication with those people at all, instead you believe that your ideals are the best ideals and everyone else should have to follow them instead of being their own individual and making their own individual choices. Yet you have the gall to talk about exploitation in the same breath as you talk about exploiting the rest of us to fulfill your fantasy world.
For the record, I sit in the legalize sex work camp, where people who want to do it can freely do it with the protections that every other kind of work gets. This also allows to reduce the stigma so that the people who don't want to do it can easily get out by going to the authorities. Much like how labor laws made it harder to exploit the worker, the same kind of protections should be made available for those who do and don't want to work in the sex work industry.
Maybe. But did you ever think about the people who are exploited by their partners posting the supposedly private sex tapes/pics? It's not only money but also power. Btw., like everything else seemingly "free" you pay for porn with your data/via ad revenue.
Sell their body for sex?
Who pays for porn these days?
And that's pretty much the problem, who do you think is behind those bans?
The Amish?
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
No "demand" by greedy people like you and me?
If there was no "demand" Nike sneakers wouldn't be made with child labour in countries with low wage rates.
If there was no "demand" iphones wouldn't be made in sweat shops by workers on the edge of exhaustion.
If there was no "demand" we wouldn't be burning down rain forests to grow cows to make hamburgers.
Every thing we do is driven by the "demand" of greedy people. This has nothing to do with the problem. How that demand is met is the problem and making a blanket statement like "porn is the problem" is no more valid than a blanket statement like "manufacturing iphones is the problem".
I'm sorry if porn happens to be a trigger for you to lose your sensibilities.
because sex is still taboo in most societies
Your own words.
I love porn, I don’t want it adorning the walls of my house.
Post your crap somewhere else, on the GD INTERNET.
but nobody else goes there
Scornful facepalm.
You did not explain what the distinction is.
Why is it different in your opinion to
a) make a video of yourself playing ping-pong clothed
and
b) make a video of yourself playing ping-pong naked.
I don't respond to or upvote ACs
Hopefully they archive the relevant boards, then use the same mechanism for DDoS of Tumblr. Have the sysadmins swearing "oaths" about their new overlords at Verizon/Oath/Yahoo. If you can't play with it, you can at least break the toy so no one else can have it.
There are things that should not be seen for what has been seen cannot be unseen.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Starts with the question why they pose for those tapes in the first place.
But you might know that there are laws against this and it's fairly easy to get them enforced, so what exactly seems to be the problem?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
That's your opinion. Mine is different, I see a clear distiction between those two, as I expressed above. So let's agree to differ.
That's fine for you, it that case I recommend you do not sell your body for sex.
But that doesn't mean it isn't fine for other people who have different views.
Greedy because I got hooked on it (which is my own fault). Problem because it creates demand. I compared it to low wage jobs because eco-fascists say, "you're not forced to do it", disregarding that people have to make a living somehow if they don't want to become criminals.
I don't agree with you when you say all the distress is due to "silly taboos". It is stress to psyche per se with consequences like anxiety and depression. I suppose that people engaging in porn industry do not consider or maybe even know about the side effects beforehand.
Apart from that: what's wrong with people that they have to archive pics or whatever from tumblr? As if there wasn't an incredible plethora of sources for that stuff available already. Noone could ever watch all that!
... doesn't really depict the real world at all. ...
I have some bad news for you.
Whatever 'real world' you think exists, just because you aren't part of a culture, group, or movement.... its value is not diminished nor heightened by your absence from it. Basically, your importance as you see it, and perspective, are over-rated. Just like mine, as I was not a part of Tumblr either.
I'm hoping you realize there's 7 Billion people on the planet who don't care whether or not you or I exist, right?
It appears to me that the advocates for the Tumblr porn ban are a coalition of religious conservatives and radical feminists. But whenever I've seen this theory mentioned, the feminists vocally deny it, and claim that, "Mainstream feminism is generally sex-positive".
I suspect that these denials are disingenuous. In fact, there is plenty of evidence of mainstream feminists advocating similar bans. For example, there was the Page 3 topless photo ban:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jan/19/has-the-sun-axed-page-3-topless-pictures
There was the Booth Babe ban:
https://kotaku.com/5916237/e3-makes-me-really-appreciate-the-pax-ban-on-booth-babes
And, of course, there is a very vocal anti-porn branch of femimism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Porn_Culture
I suspect that when somebody says that "Mainstream feminism is generally sex-positive," they're only supportive of a very specific, tightly-controlled, pro-feminist sort of sex.
People sometimes see themselves in the situation having to sell their bodies for sex. And that *is* indeed a problem
I'll fix it one day.
Support my political activism on Patreon.
I've been for improved and free health care and social security
So go fix it all, or help me fix it all.
Support my political activism on Patreon.
Came here to post it, glad to see you raised that point. Sites can still take their ball and go home from the archive, but can't play Ministry of Truth and leave the content up.
Is "punching a nazi" what you call it when you pull your pud to Tumblr porn?
when has supply side anything worked?
Perhaps they are posting from an iPhone lol
Just stay away from linux.org. OMG.
No, it doesn't anymore. It used to, but that changed.
No one would watch either of those videos.
Now get your cat to play ping pong naked, and you'd make millions.
Radical archivists are killing the open web.
I know you're trolling, but fuck you anyway. We have a right to archive anything we see. Period! You're just posting fascist bullshit.
Holy Crap. A searchable list of 2.6million archived tumblr blogs: https://transfer.sh/13Aa3n/tum...
By trying to rid the internet of porn, Verizon may have given us the best source yet.
Total Solar Eclipse Outtake: It has Blood on it!
For this reason God gave them over to dishonorable passions. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. Likewise, the men abandoned natural relations with women and burned with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Furthermore, since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, He gave them up to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed, and hatred. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant, and boastful. They invent new forms of evil; they disobey their parents. They are senseless, faithless, heartless, merciless.
Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death, they not only continue to do these things, but also approve of those who practice them.
Perhaps if it was easier to make as much money without exploitation then people would do it. But this is Western Society with its religious like infatuation with capitalism and profit. What you cactus in the majority of life is going to form a model for how you process the rest of life. It's unavoidable. What You practice you become good at until it feels natural, which means that is now the primary means of processing information by default
Censorship , business interest, and the demands of oppressive , hypersensitive, people with poor critical thinking skills is what's killing the web.
The only reason any of this is an issue is because of how they chose to allocate IP addresses when they first 'commercialized them', then because of internet bandwidth caps enforced by ISPs (starting with people like AOL and Earthlink, and moving on to formerly unlimited ISPs as either their upstream providers started charging more, or as it became impossible to get unlimited bandwidth connections.)
The real solution today is new backbones with flat allocations, similar to the older dedicated circuits of the telephone era, and pushing that no quota policy downstream so that the only restriction on internet bandwidth, both up and down, is based on actual traffic on a fairly queued allocation.
But we can't have that, because moar moniez! Really if everyone could get datacenter style unlimited bandwidth at home, at comparable rates, none of this would be an issue, as everyone could host their own if they so desired. But today the only people who can do that are living in places they will be in for 1-3 years (contract for a business class connection) and are paying 2-3x the price for asymmetric internet, or up to 10x for symmetric internet speeds, compared to their quota'd asymm/symm residential internet packages.
I know. I looked into it. Then I moved to Tor/I2P/CJDNS for my network accessable services. It may not guarantee anonymity or security, but it does guarantee network transparency and accessability almost anywhere in the world, which is more than IPv4 or IPv6 via clearnet carriers offers anymore.
Make the switch, we can start the social and technical aspects of a new internet today, and begin saying 'fuck you' to corporate ownership of our personal information.
I'm giving you information. It doesn't matter whether you believe it. It's happening anyway.
The Amish just block the porn by not having electricity in their buildings or vehicles. Even if young 13 year old Ike acquires an illicit mobile device from somewhere he has no place to charge it.
The Amish just block the porn by not having electricity in their buildings or vehicles. Even if young 13 year old Ike acquires an illicit mobile device from somewhere he has no place to charge it.
Some around here have a phone on a light pol in the middle of a field. Guess that's okay. Maybe they use dilaup to get their porn fix?
Hmm - sounds kinky.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
So you're free not to look. Your freedom not to be offended doesn't give you the right to regulate legal content you find objectionable, as long as you're not forced to consume it.
You might be surprised how valuable tumblr might be to future historians and anthropologists.
Anthropologists always say they get more information out of a garbage heap than a library.
But that doesn't mean it isn't fine for other people who have different views.
Those people are free not to sell their own bodies and I applaud them for their independent thinking and would greatly appreciate if they kept their independence away from everyone else.
Sorry replied to the wrong comment. #tired #needcoffee #hotcoffeemod
Here, here!
"Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
--- Jerry Garcia
and it turns out that Verizon decided as a final "HUG you" to cut them off.
ftfy
You're the worst kind of asshole. You can't control your shit, so you need it cast from thine sight so you won't be tempted by the devil. You can fuck right off a cliff.
Starts with the question why they pose for those tapes in the first place.
But you might know that there are laws against this and it's fairly easy to get them enforced, so what exactly seems to be the problem?
The problem is mostly that once it's on the internet, it's forever on the internet--and some of the really nasty cases, the answer to why they posed for those tapes in the first place basically comes down to "they didn't (willingly) pose." There's laws against this, too, but regardless of the ease of getting them enforced, the laws don't really do well at getting the material off the internet.
I suspect it could be helped by setting it up so your protection against users posting these images does in fact require you do your own due diligence--with the gold standard being something along the lines of you requiring copies of the legal releases...which are standard to have for any work made for commercial release, because they protect your rear end against a lot of things. These things are boilerplate forms, too, so even a site specializing in amateur work should not have trouble--just provide users with the form. (It also is a good sign of how legit any modeling or acting job is--if they don't want a release, or they won't let you have a copy of it, run.)
It sounds like one of the excuses for the conditions people "voluntarily" subject themselves to when they take on a minimum wage job. "They can quit anytime they want to, after all, right?".
. . . If it sounds like that then it's a pretty ok system. Because... yeah, everyone voluntarily (with no quotes) subjects themselves to a job in exchange for cash. And except for some crazy contract, the military, some professionals, you can just choose to quit whenever. The alternatives are: Slavery, or abolishing capitalism. And remember that the minimum is a good thing and some people don't even make that at their job.
Verizon blocked their IPs, because they don't understand how the internet works. Which is pretty damned funny, considering they have bought a lot of it. LOL.
Next someone's going to tell me I can only watch a DVD in the country I bought it in. Sigh.
Tumblr some time ago provided a switch that would allow blog owners to set their blogs as explicit or exclude them from search results (the latter toggled on automatically if you activate the former, although if you wanted to remove your SFW blog from search you could do so).
Recently they disabled the ability to deactivate these toggles - once you opt out of search or mark your blog as 'explicit', it's permanent, the toggles grayed out. That is, unless you edit the HTML source (e.g. through built in dev tools of Firefox or Chrome) and remove the relevant 'disabled'. Submit the changes and your blog is SFW again.
45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
I'm giving you information.
No you're not. You're shoveling bullshit (trolling). And who cares if you don't like it? We have the right to archive anything put into public view, even if it's behind a login screen. So again, go fuck yourself
You don't get it. Much of what would have been public won't be. It will be private communication. No, you don't have the right to archive that, and it won't matter whether you have that right, because you won't ever see it. And it's already happening.
Perhaps you should stop looking at PICTURES of women and get out in the real world and actually talk to real ones? Face all the emotional pain and distress that that may cause you, and go through it. Eventually you may find a real woman who actually loves you, and you can actually make love to a real, living human being, who holds you and cares for you.
Alternatively, spend the rest of your life clicking and clicking through picture after picture, using the 'death grip' on your penis while you try to ejaculate for the third time in two hours, and become impotent due to looking at pornography. What could possibly go wrong? Masturbation is completely unnatural, and is the act of a desperate individual. I know, I was just like you. I haven't masturbated for over a year now, I have a real, living girlfriend.
www.yourbrainonporn.com
Trying to remove something from the internet is the same as removing a piece of memory from thousands of people. It's possible if you're willing to lobotomize them.
The real solution is to get over it. There are millions of porn videos out there, more than what any one person can reasonably see in a lifetime. Many of them far more appealing. Why should anyone watch yours?
Castrate them all.