Slashdot Mirror


Giant Plastic Trap Breaks, Gets Towed Back To Land (npr.org)

The "Ocean Cleanup" project deployed a 2,000-foot floating debris trap in September near a drifting plastic patch in the Pacific Ocean that's twice as big as Texas. It broke.

An anonymous reader quotes NPR: Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17, the barrier has so far done some of what it was designed to accomplish. It travels with wind and wave propulsion, like a U-shaped Pac-Man hungry for plastic. It orients itself in the wind and it catches and concentrates plastic, sort of. But as Slat, now 24, recently discovered with the beta tester for his design, plastic occasionally drifts out of its U-shaped funnel. The other issue with the beta tester, called System 001, is that last week, a 60-feet-long end section broke off.

The first issue, Slat said, was likely due to the device's speed. In a September interview with NPR, he said the device averages about four inches per second, which his team has now concluded is too slow. The break in the barrier was due to an issue with the material used to build it. "In principle, I think we are relatively close to getting it working," Slat said in an interview Saturday with NPR's Michel Martin. "It's just that sometimes the plastic is also escaping again. Likely what we have to do is we have to speed up the system so that it constantly moves faster than the plastic." For the material failure, Slat said his team will probably try to locally reinforce the system to combat the problem of material fatigue.

Slat's U-shaped plastic trap is now being towed the 800 miles back to Hawaii for repairs.

142 comments

  1. leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should just leave it out there. The next one will pick it up.

    1. Re: leave it by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Saving the environment.
      1000 of ship-miles and lots of construction per year.

      I'm just joking and maybe in the end it can be beneficial / advantages outweight disadvantages but so far ..

  2. How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Instead of being emotionally attached to the sea, because he's sailing and life's at the sea, Zlat could have done so much more, with way less money. how? by looking at the facts and talking to experts. but that would require sanity and desire for facts. fact 1: most of the rubbish poured in the sea comes from 4 big Rivers, all in developing countries, mostly China. the problem is there not on the sea, don't fight symptoms, but causes
    fact 2: just watch this clip:
    https://youtu.be/8PavA4rUypE
    you will never ever outrun the speed of pollution with this childish single-minded idea. what is this guy smoking? the most interesting point in this video is the cake shift at the end. the problem is uneducated poor people. period. your straw ban will give the outcry mob a boner it fixes nothing

    1. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any time anyone tries to do something good for the environment there will always be some armchair warrior like you trying to shit on everything. Thankfully nobody needs to take what you say seriously.

    2. Re:How millennials tackle problems by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      don't fight symptoms, but causes

      both have to be looked after...

    3. Re:How millennials tackle problems by tfried · · Score: 1

      your straw ban will give the outcry mob a boner it fixes nothing

      How come I think you are actually a part of said outcry mob? Oh, perhaps because you are riding on one of their favorite themes: "This single measure won't fix all of the problem, so let's just do nothing." And in face, now you've brought the second measure into the discussion, and discarded it right away (like a used plastic straw).

      Seriously: No the straw ban will not fix any more than a tiny part of the plastic problem (but actually, it will help reducing local pollution levels). Further, I am highly sceptical that this plastic trap thing will ever work.

      But arguing not look into any partial solution, because it does not fix the whole mess, is a really sad excuse for inaction.

    4. Re:How millennials tackle problems by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      don't fight symptoms, but causes

      both have to be looked after...

      But I'm not certain we are looking after both. If the well known sources of this problem were to stop dumping plastics, the problem would largely disappear.

      At that point the remaining problem would be the plastic microspheres. That is something the first world has to own.

      Not the large scale dumping of plastics into the ocean from Africa and China.

      I get the UN notices, and darned if they don't try to lay the blame for this at our feet.

      Now if we're serious about this and don't want to play the cards against the modern world game, a source based solution might be:

      Recycling plastic waste. We do it here in the USA.

      If we want to pump money into it, help African nations that cause much of the problem build the plants to do this. China is a problem, but leadership has proven sensitive to shame. Right now since it is somehow not their fault, there is no reason for them to stop.

      The problem nations can collect the plastic at the point where it enters the ocean at first. Hopefully they would start a recycling program that doesn't involve sewerizing their rivers, but that's more of an internal problem.

      Because much of any damage that is done happens before the plastics settle into a mid ocean gyre, we really do have to see this ocean vacuum"solution" as a lame one based more on political considerations of who is easiest to blame.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re: How millennials tackle problems by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Recycling plastic waste. We do it here in the USA. All? (Some is recycled here in Brazil too... Some cities here do almost all: that's not enough, not even close...)

    6. Re: How millennials tackle problems by fbobraga · · Score: 1
      fixing the post (HTML on mobile is an adventure: no "preview"):

      Recycling plastic waste. We do it here in the USA.

      All? (Some is recycled here in Brazil too... Some cities here do almost all: that's not enough, not even close...)

    7. Re:How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We recycle.... by putting it on boats to China. China shut that down last year during the tariff fight.

    8. Re: How millennials tackle problems by aliquis · · Score: 0

      And the solution is: Final!

    9. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone with a brain told them it wouldn't work, but they gladly took money and did it anyway.

    10. Re: How millennials tackle problems by tsa · · Score: 2

      Where I live we collect plastic separately. We (the inhabitants of my city) were told that the plastic would be recycled. Now it turns out that it is 'burned in an environmentally friendly way' in a separate oven. Yay! The only incentive to keep separating it now is the fact that we don't have to pay for the removal of the plastic.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    11. Re: How millennials tackle problems by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mixed plastics are best recycled by being used as fuel. That is a harsh economic fact.

      If you can't incinerate for power, then burying is the next best option. 'Throwing into nearest river' isn't in the top ten, neither is 'losing money hand sorting by chemistry so you can mix it with new plastic and make extra brittle new things'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Informative

      fixing the post (HTML on mobile is an adventure: no "preview"):

      Recycling plastic waste. We do it here in the USA.

      All? (Some is recycled here in Brazil too... Some cities here do almost all: that's not enough, not even close...)

      Perfect is surely the pernicious enemy of good. We have four recycling setups here where I am. One is the municipal, which takes glass, aluminum, most plastics, paper and cardboard. Large metallic items can be dropped off at our transfer station gratis. Oddball plastics that are recyclable are now being taken at the nature conservancy locations, and they also take large cardboard items - think the box a refrigerator comes in.

      The last line is the local people who will buy copper and other metals from you. I have bags of wire that I just drop off for them.

      Is it all of every recycleable item? That's probably not attainable. But one thing is for certain, precious little makes it into rivers that dump in the ocean. We don't do badly, The first world's contribution to the problem is in microspheres. But we'll take care of that as well.

      So let us look at where evil America is in the list of criminals befouling our oceans with plastic. From eco watch: https://www.ecowatch.com/these... Hardly a conservative anti-ecological site. They even have vegan pink hair dye recipes. China, indonesia, Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.

      https://www.acsh.org/news/2018...

      90 percent. 90 freaking percent of the plastic pollution. The USA could disappear tomorrow, and it would hardly make a dent in the amount of plastic dumped in the ocean.

      So no, the USA does not recycle 100 percent of all materials. I'm skeptical that anyone is. Oh, bullshit - no one is. But worrying over our lack of perfection, to blame it on us, while 90 percent is coming from elsewhere is simply irrational. And won't fix the problem either.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:How millennials tackle problems by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      We recycle.... by putting it on boats to China. China shut that down last year during the tariff fight.

      If they don't want it any more, we'll find a different way to recycle it. But we won't chuck it into the rivers.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re: How millennials tackle problems by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's the problem? Burning for power IS recycling.

      If the plastic retains 70% of it's feedstocks fuel value, and takes it 50% of the same fuel value to make into new plastic, burning is the best solution. You can measure in dollars or tons of CO2, you'll almost always get the same answer.

      The problem is dozens of types of plastics. Be careful what you ask for. Some really really dumb, head up ass, cities have different recycle bins for each plastic 'recycle number'. They still don't recycle more than a tiny % into 'new plastic'. Best they can do is plastic deck 'lumber' from milk bottles. That's the 'success story'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re: How millennials tackle problems by sfcat · · Score: 0

      What's the problem? Burning for power IS recycling.

      Clearly you have never burned plastics before. Its a nasty process that releases lots of weird toxic fumes. I don't even want to know what happens when you do it at an industrial scale but it couldn't be very *environmentally friendly*. The fumes released could be just a simple hydrocarbon, or it could contain cyanides, or PCB’s, or Dioxins or lots of other substances. Without knowing what the plastic was it would be difficult to know what are the likely volatiles it would create. Scrubbing all those different types of material from a waste stream would be prohibitively difficult. Then there's the fact that it takes LOTs of energy to burn plastics, probably more than to melt a metal with a low melting point like Aluminum. Basically, its a terrible idea. But without really intensive sorting, which is almost impossible due to our very common practice of mixing of different types of plastics into single products, you can't really recycle plastic except to make more poor quality plastic with it. With sorting you can make less poor quality plastic with it, or more complex chemical processing becomes possible. Burning plastc, is like burning bunker fuel, its a terrible idea done because we can't think of anything else to do with this sludge and keeping it around isn't an option.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    16. Re: How millennials tackle problems by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Clearly you 'don't want to know'...I'll tell you anyhow.

      They burn it hot, mixed with natural gas and get CO2 and water out the exhaust. It is _common_.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re: How millennials tackle problems by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Clearly you have never burned plastics before. Its a nasty process that releases lots of weird toxic fumes.

      Depends on the temperature, pressure, and atmosphere you burn it under. A simple higher temperature, like found in an incinerator, will turn common plastic (polythene, polypropene, styrene, butadiene, acrylonitrile, ) into H2O, CO2, and N2.

      In practice you get some NOx rather than N2 from acrylonitrile. And some chlorine compounds if there is any polyvinyl chloride in the mix. You can deal with both with some chemistry in the scrubbers. Some waste compounds like formaldehyde are valuable for making more plastic.

      Then there's the fact that it takes LOTs of energy to burn plastics, probably more than to melt a metal with a low melting point like Aluminum.

      You say it's a "fact", but it's not true. There commercial systems currently in operation that burn plastic for net energy. Holding a match under a chunk of plastic isn't the same as blowing with a gas mix in a high temperature oven.

      Gasification in "waste-to-energy" plants is what gets the media excited, because it can go into modified cars. But I don't agree that it is worth the additional energy and processing. On site power generation is simpler than a gasification plant and avoids the waste in conversion, bottling and shipping.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    18. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Freischutz · · Score: 0

      Mixed plastics are best recycled by being used as fuel. That is a harsh economic fact.

      If you can't incinerate for power, then burying is the next best option. 'Throwing into nearest river' isn't in the top ten, neither is 'losing money hand sorting by chemistry so you can mix it with new plastic and make extra brittle new things'.

      Mixed plastics being burned is releasing sequestered carbon into the atmosphere making the problem of climate change worse. Those are harsh environmental and climatic facts. Of the two choices presented here neither choice is a good one but burying the plastic (a.k.a. sequestered carbon) is better than burning it and releasing more carbon into the atmosphere which should have remained buried in the first place back when it was still oil. Personally, I think plastics cannot be banned quickly enough.

    19. Re: How millennials tackle problems by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You haven't considered your default case. It isn't some hippy renewable silliness.

      Your choices are: burn new oil and use shitty plastic or burn shitty plastic and make new plastic out of oil.

      Actually you first have to figure out a way to separate the plastic by chemistry, but even if you assume the hard part is done, it still makes sense to just burn the plastic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what other proposals are people actively trying? Whenever there's a large project like this there are failures and setbacks. It do you think the first rocket got people to the Moon and that the first incandescent light bulb is the one we still use?

      The basic idea here wasn't that far off, but there are revisions needed and I don't hear other people making actual functioning prototypes to address the matter.

    21. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      You haven't considered your default case. It isn't some hippy renewable silliness.

      Your choices are: burn new oil and use shitty plastic or burn shitty plastic and make new plastic out of oil.

      Actually you first have to figure out a way to separate the plastic by chemistry, but even if you assume the hard part is done, it still makes sense to just burn the plastic.

      Well I was only commenting on the two choices presented in that post which were burning it or burying it and neither requires sophisticated chemistry. My idea would be to limit the use of plastics to the absolute minimum necessary, provide incentives for industry to come up with less damaging alternatives to plastics and pressure the Asian countries responsible for these 85% of oceanic plastic pollution into cracking down on that plastic pollution. If somebody like Ocean Cleanup can then clean up a significant amount of the existing plastic pollution within a reasonable timeframe at reasonable cost then that's a project worth pursuing. As for it making sense to burn, what is it now? 15 million? tons of annually added oceanic plastic pollution instead of dumping it in the ocean, never mind burning all of the much, much, much larger amount of plastic garbage that accumulates on land annually, that only makes sense if one is some kind of deluded Trumpkin who thinks human driven thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax (hint: It isn't) because plastic in the end is sequestered carbon.

    22. Re: How millennials tackle problems by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If we bury it, we pump more oil. You are not a dictator, stay on topic.

      If your proposed solution involves you (or anybody else, but especially you) having that kind of power, it's a BAD idea.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    23. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem would not disappear. We still need to remove the plastic already there. Both removal and prevention are necessary.

    24. Re: How millennials tackle problems by tsa · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? Burning for power IS recycling.

      Plastic is made from oil. Oil is a fossil fuel. Burning fossil fuels increases the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, which causes climate change. Hence burning plastic is not a good idea. That is the problem.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    25. Re:How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the well known sources of this problem were to stop dumping plastics, the problem would largely disappear.

      The problem with plastic is that it takes a long time to disappear, from 20 to 450 years, depending on the type of plastic. Finding ways to clean up the mess already created is not the whole solution but it is part of the solution. This project may fail, but failures often contain useful lessons. I don't see it as a waste of effort.

    26. Re:How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're prolly right. With the way Trump is recklessly wiping out regulations, I we'll prolly dump it directly into the oceans, since that is where it is going to end up anyway.

      Out of sight, out of mind. Let the grandkids take care of it. #IGotMineYouFightForYours. #MAGA.

    27. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it takes LOTs of energy to burn plastics

      It takes lots of energy to melt plastics without burning them and recycle them into another shape.
      If you burn the plastics, you GET energy, not lose it.

    28. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have never burned plastics before. Its a nasty process that releases lots of weird toxic fumes.

      Depends on the temperature, pressure, and atmosphere you burn it under. A simple higher temperature, like found in an incinerator, will turn common plastic (polythene, polypropene, styrene, butadiene, acrylonitrile, ) into H2O, CO2, and N2.

      In practice you get some NOx rather than N2 from acrylonitrile. And some chlorine compounds if there is any polyvinyl chloride in the mix. You can deal with both with some chemistry in the scrubbers. Some waste compounds like formaldehyde are valuable for making more plastic.

      As a mechanical engineer working in the field of combustion, both are true. You may have heard the old saying, "where there's smoke, there's fire." Well, that's not really true. Where there's smoke, there's incomplete combustion. Burning organic chemicals like many plastics will reduce in to water vapor and carbon dioxide in many cases, provided the combustion is hot enough and in the presence of a catalyst. However, not all plastics are simple ethylene chains. Plastics such as vinyl have chlorine atoms that can produce toxic gases.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    29. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a controlled burn where the CO2 is pumped into a greenhouse of those genetically enhanced plants that are CO2 eating machines. Seems doable.

    30. Re: How millennials tackle problems by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The problem would not disappear. We still need to remove the plastic already there. Both removal and prevention are necessary.

      Sure. But my point is not that what is there doesn't have to be cleaned up.

      But if we clean it up without any mitigation on the part of those who are actually causing the problem, and those are actually responsible for the problem, they have absolutely zero reason to stop doing what they should be responsible for. Just keep blaming it on the first world.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re: How millennials tackle problems by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The problem is as follows: People have mental energy. They spend it on things. When they feel they've "done their good deed", they don't do anymore until that recharges.
      If they're spending all their energy on ineffective things, it's actually counterproductive: It KEEPS them from doing actually effective tasks.

      Early Prius adopters in my town were a prime example. They drove terrible, because simply being in their Prius counted for good, so they could behave like asses on the road.

    32. Re: How millennials tackle problems by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The Japanese were doing this back in 98 when I lived there, and dealing with the dioxins, etc. In fact, when things went wrong with the process, it was usually dioxin related to not having a high enough temperature.
      Trash was sorted as Burnable and non burnable. Burnable ( paper, food scraps ) was burned. Non burnable ( plastic) was burned at a much higher temperature.

    33. Re: How millennials tackle problems by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      However, not all plastics are simple ethylene chains. Plastics such as vinyl have chlorine atoms that can produce toxic gases.

      As stated in previous post: "And some chlorine compounds if there is any polyvinyl chloride in the mix. You can deal with both with some chemistry in the scrubbers. Some waste compounds like formaldehyde are valuable for making more plastic."

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  3. Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by Bearhouse · · Score: 0

    Enough said - it's nice that someone is trying to do something, and I'm sure the guy is good-intentioned - but pretty much all the experts said this would happen and the resources would be better spent elsewhere.

    1. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prototypes rarely works perfect the first time. Build it stronger, try again. Normal for untested novel devices.

      Also, it doesn't matter if the thing occationally looses a piece of plastic - as long as it catches more than it leaks.

    2. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by tsa · · Score: 2

      At least he's trying. I see nobody else try something like what he does.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a reason for that: There are 150,000,000 tons of plastic in the oceans now, and 8,000,000 tons new each year. Each trap was supposed to clean up 150,000 POUNDS of plastic each year (if it worked 100%). You would need 2 million of these to clean up what is in the oceans now, and another 100,000 just to get the new waste. This is why no one is trying anything like what he is doing. It is a stupid idea.

    4. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Another obviously stupid idea: passenger traffic by air! Using something that can barely lift one person 10 feet above ground over a distance less than 900 feet? Humbug!

    5. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Something worked once, therefor all ideas are good!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You are right. Every idea is equally valid. My mistake. I forgot how Millenials think. Are you working on your hyperspace craft made out of bacon yet?

    7. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was just trying really hard to cook up some BS extracurriculars for his college application...

    8. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by citizenr · · Score: 0

      It didnt catch _any_ plastic so far

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    9. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by fwad · · Score: 2

      actually if you RTFA you'll see that it did. Even if it doesn't work at least he's trying to do something to help

      --
      -- Kernel Panic: Error reading /dev/caffeine
    10. Re:Invented by Boyan Slat when he was just 17... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- Carl Sagan

  4. Cynic in me says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I told you so. Optimist in me says pls try again. Pessimist says don't bother, humanity will shit where it eats no matter what.

  5. Dutch determination to clean up after Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They won't do it themselves after flushing plastic into the pacific for 50 years, and now the ungratefulness when this Dutch guy and his non-profit can't clean up their mess properly. Wow. Just how quickly Americans think the world owes them something.

    1. Re:Dutch determination to clean up after Americans by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      They won't do it themselves after flushing plastic into the pacific for 50 years, and now the ungratefulness when this Dutch guy and his non-profit can't clean up their mess properly. Wow. Just how quickly Americans think the world owes them something.

      Fascinating, my dear coward. Perhaps you could enlighten us on how China and Africa dumping almost the entirety of oceanic plastic is the fault of teh evilz 'murricans?

      I dunno, me hearty - do we want to actually fix this problem? If we do, we don't wait until the plastic assembles into a gyre in the middle of the ocean. We stop it at the source. And we know exactly where the sources are. And they aren't in the evilz 'murrica.

      But it is easier to just have a blame target for everything I suppose, making you more of a prejudiced bigot than those you hate.

      Let us know how that works out for ya, mkay?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Dutch determination to clean up after Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it. You typed that one handed while Dutch ruddering.

  6. Re: Dutch determination to clean up after American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like cleaning up after India and Asian countries.

    -geekpoet

  7. How did he get the resources anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I, and probably you too, came up with much greater things when we were young.
    And we could also have actually created them.
    But I don't remember us having millions to pay engineers and entire damn towing ships and so on.
    I literally (not making this up) had toilet rolls, marbles and dirt to play with.[1]

    So ... where do I apply for that opportunity mother lode?

    ___
    [1] That’s what my parents could offer us. To make up for it, we stole stuff from construction sites, and used things from the forest, to build tree houses. Which was a lot of fun. But would I have had a ruby and a neon tube, I would probably have been able to build a laser before puberty (in the 80s, mind you). I knew exactly how.

    1. Re: How did he get the resources anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was fortunate that I had an outdated home computer to fiddle with, but even that palls in comparison to the engineering and design resources required to achieve this. I thought the 90s were meant to be the pinnacle of hedonistic spending and we were still coming out of a recession today.

    2. Re:How did he get the resources anyway? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      We imagined 'greater things', now we can actually build real things.

      I've known some smart kids, but never one that had an intuitive understanding of cast/benefit. You have to earn that with past mistakes. Get over loving your own ideas. 'Everything is a tradeoff' is drummed into your head in engineering school, as it should be.

      Bet this boom has shed more weight of plastic than it collected, as will the next prototype.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Why not put this at river exits? by treymichaelcook · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Almost all the plastic trash going into the sea is coming from a handful of rivers in Asia & Africa. So why not put this plastic trap at the river mouths of those high trash rivers, like the Ganges or Yangtze? Seems to me like it would be easier to catch the plastic in such concentrated locations, before UV rays & ocean waves have broken it down into little bits.

    1. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would require Indians and Asians to actually give a fuck, which clearly they don't.

      It's why climate change is inevitable. Any solution which requires cooperation from India and Asian countries is doomed to fail and is simply a waste of effort and money.

    2. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a large parking lot of them (nuke em) and let nature reclaim the land while we clean up the rest of the world.

    3. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by dromgodis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would require Americans to actually give a fuck, which clearly they don't.

      It's why climate change is inevitable. Any solution which requires cooperation from Americans is doomed to fail and is simply a waste of effort and money.

      FTFY.

      There are also a lot of other entities that could be substituted there. You could probably boil it down to just "any solution which requires cooperation".

    4. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans aren't filling the ocean with plastic, asshole

      Americans aren't killing nearly 1M people a year with their coal consumption

      Maybe Beijing is more your style

    5. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Almost all the plastic trash going into the sea is coming from a handful of rivers in Asia & Africa. So why not put this plastic trap at the river mouths of those high trash rivers, like the Ganges or Yangtze?

      As you can see just by the posts in here, a lot of people simply want to blame the USA.

      Weird, when the problem is completely visible and undeniable to people who are rational, and can look at pictures and video and see the sources.

      Rational people also understand that you don't fix problems by attacking the wrong country, something we painfully learned a few years back.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, most of the plastic there comes from the West who are simply exporting the problem, and some of them do give a fuck, which is precisely why China has now refused to accept any more plastic waste exported to it from the West.

      And the US is STILL by far the biggest polluter on the planet, whatever lame efforts it's made so far to change that, so suggesting the problem extends to India and Asian countries too is utter nonsense.

      It's pretty clear the West at very least deserves equal blame for the problem.

    7. Re: Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the fuck do you get your numbers from

    8. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Rational people also understand that you don't fix problems by attacking the wrong country, something we painfully learned a few years back"

      Which country is that? Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya? Yugoslavia? Vietnam?
      The painful lessons were learned by the people living in those countries, not the attackers

    9. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      A handful seems misleading based on this, there are also no small few in North America and Europe. I also wonder if we were to consider population whether it would look similar.

    10. Re: Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China stopped taking plastic because they're having a Trade Hissyfit with Trump.
      The US is not even remotely close to being the worst polluter. And unlike most of the Paris Accord countries we actually DO work to reduce emissions as opposed to just writing feel good words on paper.

    11. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the parts are designed to withstand degradation due to heavy concentrations of human waste.

      https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/1000-width/images/2014/07/blogs/graphic-detail/20140712_gdc954.png

    12. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      Do you have any proof this is the case?

    13. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you can now distinguish Indians from Asians is it?

    14. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      " Rational people also understand that you don't fix problems by attacking the wrong country, something we painfully learned a few years back"

      Which country is that? Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya? Yugoslavia? Vietnam? The painful lessons were learned by the people living in those countries, not the attackers

      Read my post - including the part you quoted.

      And while you strut around like a little cock-a-whoop as if you made a point - you are doing exactly the same thing. Which ironically means you support the US attacking the wrong countries. I don't, dear coward. In any circumstance.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Americans aren't filling the ocean with plastic, asshole

      Wrong, America is the biggest consumer of plastic in the world.

      > Americans aren't killing nearly 1M people a year with their coal consumption

      True, they're doing it with oil instead.

      > Maybe Beijing is more your style

      Maybe Russia is more your style, because they also like to spread bullshit and FUD about climate change and pollution.

    16. Re: Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They stop taking in plastic before Trump's hissy fit. And if was due to Trump, they would probably be still taking in Europe's trash, but they don't.

    17. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Feces are biological. Its constituents are chemically simple and able to be used as food by other organisms. We're just careful with where we dump human feces because they contain diseases which can rapidly spread out of control to other humans if you allow human feces to mix with open water. Insects, birds, and animals dump their feces everywhere all the time (the oceans are full of feces from fish). We don't really care about it because for the most part they don't contain diseases which can spread to humans.

      Plastics are created using a natural material (oil) which some bacteria can break down and use. But the manufacturing process turns the relatively short petroleum molecules into extremely long molecules which no bacteria can break down. You have to wait for ultraviolet light (whose frequency is high enough to be ionizing) to break it into molecules short enough for bacteria can handle. That's why plastic turns brittle when left in the sun for months. The problem is it can take a very, very long time for plastics to break down to molecular lengths short enough for bacteria to consume when the polymer is tens or hundreds of thousands of CHn chains long.

    18. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How specifically do you solve the following if you put this across a river mouth?:

      -Boat Traffic in or out
      -Organic Debris collection and separation
      -Public Safety
      -Cleaning and Maintenance
      -Shifting Deltas
      -Changes in column height and currents
      -Animal Migration
      -Plastic in suspension below the trap
      -Efficiency of reclamation

      Just to name a few.

      What really needs to happen here is a complete replacement of plastic with something environmentally degradable.
      Take for example our humble Coconut compared to a Bottle of Water.
      Which one perfectly delivers human nutrients, hydration, food, utensil and fire starter?
      Once finished with the delivery system, which one perfectly returns to the environment?

      Which one has a vested interest in your health and the environment?
      CocaCola or Nestle?
      Correct, neither.

      We have a long way to go before this problem is solved.
      Hats off to the guy for at least attracting some attention to the problem...now lets talk about a solution.

    19. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Almost all the plastic trash going into the sea is coming from a handful of rivers in Asia & Africa.

      Oh look this again. No no it doesn't. Stop reading just the headline and read TFA where you originally heard this fact. Only about 1/5th of the plastic in the ocean comes from Rivers. The 90% number is the amount of plastic that goes to the sea FROM RIVERS comes from just a handful of rivers, 8 in Asia, 2 in Africa.

      To be clear 90% of 20% total is still a high number and it's well worth filtering those streams, but if you're going to be armed with facts at least get the facts right.

    20. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He read a headline and not an article. Only about 20% of world plastic waste comes from rivers. However that 90% figure is still right with a caveat: 90% of plastic waste coming *from rivers* comes from just 10 rivers in the world.

      Every article I've seen on this topic has the headline misrepresent this fact but gets it right in the article itself: https://www.weforum.org/agenda...

    21. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Rational people also understand that you don't fix problems by attacking the wrong country

      Oh? I thought you were the most powerful country in the world. How far you seem to have fallen.

    22. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Only about 1/5th of the plastic in the ocean comes from Rivers

      Where is the rest of the plastic coming from?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Rational people also understand that you don't fix problems by attacking the wrong country

      Oh? I thought you were the most powerful country in the world. How far you seem to have fallen.

      You're gonna have to explain that. I can't fit it into the context of what we are talking about.

      Explain how reducing the US's plastic oceanic pollution is going to eliminate plastic in the ocean. If the USA didn't exist, would it have to be invented so you had something to blame it on?

      I understand that I'm an idiot, but in most cases, a problem can be fixed by treating the source of the problem. Me? My way of approaching the problem is to stop it at the source. We ain't the source.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    24. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      And the article talks about massive cleanup efforts in those nations.

    25. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What? Your not going to just take his word for it? He's posted the same claim 5 times. If that doesn't make something a fact...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    26. Re: Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conveniently sidestepping the point. It's not American plastics winding up in the oceans it's mostly from specific rivers in Asia.

    27. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 'plastic trap?' You realize that a lot of the stuff that comes down a river is floaty wood stuff. How exactly are you going to separate it neatly into plastic and non-plastic?

    28. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah and? This is a good thing.

    29. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You're gonna have to explain that.

      Gladly. Shithole nations are followers in every way. We brought them technology, products, processes, and money by the bucketload. The Vietnamese who are pouring mountains of plastic into the ocean didn't invent these, they were introduced to them by western nations.

      As such pointing the finger to their waste without demonstrating a suitable alternative is disingenuous. They learnt to drink from plastic bottles from us, it's up to us to demonstrate that they can live without it too.

      Despite my flippant comment the USA still is the most powerful nation in the world. Do not underestimate the amount of influence it has on waste from these countries. And despite my comment I don't call out USA alone here. All western nations have a role to play, not the least those such as Australia who actively exported their plastic waste to they very countries which are accused of polluting the oceans with it.

      We should once again become the leaders we have always claimed to be.

    30. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Where is the rest of the plastic coming from?

      Err all over the place. The world has a large and damn dirty coastline, we dump a fuckton of waste from ships. Storms carry garbage from land to sea. Like it or not, we as a species are fucking grubs.

    31. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He's posted the same claim 5 times. If that doesn't make something a fact...

      If you counted you'd notice I didn't post 5 times. If you paid attention in several of my posts I cited the source. If you're at all willing to advance yourself rather than just post shit you'd google it and self educate on the topic too you'll very quickly come up with lots of articles all pointing to a study of waste from rivers which made the original claim that 90% of the waste *from rivers* comes from just 10 rivers and footnotes saying that makes up 1/5 to 1/4 of the total waste depending on which other study you choose. Now go forth and learn.

    32. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Most of the plastic is simply domestically generated in China and India. And even if plastic is imported, it becomes their responsibility.

    33. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If it was a fact, it would have been typed in all caps.

    34. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You're gonna have to explain that.

      Gladly. Shithole nations are followers in every way. We brought them technology, products, processes, and money by the bucketload. The Vietnamese who are pouring mountains of plastic into the ocean didn't invent these, they were introduced to them by western nations.

      As such pointing the finger to their waste without demonstrating a suitable alternative is disingenuous.

      Fascinating rationale. Problem is, the alternative to just plopping the plastics into a river that ends up in the ocean has been around a while: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . Especially that in some of these countries, labor is in ready supply, and one of the issues - that of sorting - can be largely taken care of.

      They learnt to drink from plastic bottles from us, it's up to us to demonstrate that they can live without it too.

      I doubt that living without plastic is practical. Recycling is practical.

      Despite my flippant comment the USA still is the most powerful nation in the world. Do not underestimate the amount of influence it has on waste from these countries. And despite my comment I don't call out USA alone here. All western nations have a role to play, not the least those such as Australia who actively exported their plastic waste to they very countries which are accused of polluting the oceans with it.

      We should once again become the leaders we have always claimed to be.

      There seems to be an undercurrent that China buys this plastic, then dumps it. Strange business model, that. What they did do, was process plastic and paper. Did do, because they stopped https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...

      Now, between you and me and the voices in our heads, there is precious little that the US can do by itself. Or Europe. We can stop sending our recyclables to China, and do our own recycling, that's been taken care of by the Chinese. We can do other countries recycling, I suppose. That really seems like the sort of thing individual countries should do.

      Probably the only thing that might work is the present United Nations effort. But it is kind of weird, having to act like it is the USA's problem, while making rah rah about the efforts in the countries that are responsible. http://web.unep.org/unepmap/un... . Note that particular link is pretty innocuous, but I receive notices, some acting like the USA banning plastic straws for waxed paper ones will cure the problem. Or that these brave intrepid countries are cleaning the oceans of the USA's criminal activities.

      So I guess they have figured that they need to lowkey pump the very fashionable hatred of the USA and sneak some concept of non-piggishness to these countries through the back door to get things done. Global politics, amirite?

      In the end, the concept of those doing the inventing - (do you blame Charles Goodyear, Alexander Parkes, or the person who discovered chicle?) as responsible for the utterly disgusting habits of other people is stretching logic to the snapping point of a synthetic rubber band.

      In fact, this problem has at base the problem of too damn many people.

      But there is a worse problem. Does one improve the health and fecundity of people who might have simply lived short lives in step with their mental outlook, or is one better to leave them alone and eliminate the problems that occur from over rapid population growth? In the weirdest twist of the blame the USA bogeyman, we are sort of responsible for extending the lifespan of people in these countries.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    35. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by maestroX · · Score: 1

      ... (the oceans are full of feces from fish).

      Thanks, rest assured it's not the plastics spoiling the planned family trip to the beach.

    36. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Hold on a moment, are you saying that because the US introduced someone to an invention, we're responsible for it's misuse all the way down the line? If that's the case, then China is responsible for all gun violence.

    37. Re:Why not put this at river exits? by G00F · · Score: 1

      Facts say otherwise. I do find some things saying USA is in top 5/10(of ocean pollution, nut specifically plastics), but provide no information on it, and feels more like FUD. (however, New York needs to stop dumping trash in ocean)
      https://www.wsj.com/articles/w...
      https://www.usatoday.com/story...
      https://www.ecowatch.com/these...
      https://www.dw.com/en/almost-a...

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  9. Still early days. Reasonable 1st attempt real-worl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Solutions to big problems seldom work perfectly the first 10 attempts.
    Lots of examples of these problems around the world.

    Trying to do something is a good thing. We learn more from our failures, after all. Hopefully, someone rich will decide it is worth funding the cleanup.

  10. Re: Dutch determination to clean up after American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's rich.

    Can we have the Dodo and several hundred other extinct animals back from the Dutch?

    You morons literally created a sport where you beat dodos with a stick and drove them to extinction.

    Also, India and China produce 83% of the world's plastic pollution, you dumb motherfucker.

  11. boom by kqc7011 · · Score: 1

    Did the boom that failed meet OPA-90 requirements for all open water applications?

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
  12. Well, now that’s ironic by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    The plastic thing sent out to collect plastic trash from the ocean turns out to have been made of plastic trash.

    Don’t send plastic to do metal’s job. (Because metal never fails at sea... oh, wait... shit. Send paper... SEND PAPER!)

    Seriously though. The thing that was sent out to collect plastic trash turned out to be trash and made of plastic. The irony is just too delicious!

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:Well, now that’s ironic by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      Ironic, like a trashcan made of recycled materials? I don't think you understand what irony is.

    2. Re:Well, now that’s ironic by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no irony, tech is being developed and there will be failures. it's solvable engineering problems they face

      the core idea is good and solid

  13. You mean media hyped "geniuses" aren't real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The media loves this sort of shit because it presents a simple solution to a complex problem, but it pretty much never works. "Boy Genius comes up with perfect new solution for Problem X". The last time this happened was with Kevin Costner, and that stupid oil spill sucking machine. It also didn't work.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/dirty-history-kevin-costners-oil-spill-machines/352739/

    Are we ever going to stop falling for this crap?

    1. Re:You mean media hyped "geniuses" aren't real? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well nope, not until traditional msm media dies off and media becomes actual talent based. but that would need readers to remember more than 5 years so I'm not holding my breath.

      about plastic, what itches me in reporting about it is all the talk about asia and not recycling. They do recycle a fuckton of it! probably more than western countries. why? western countries can't afford people to go through trash cans sorting out plastic - whereas countries like thailand, china, vietnam etc all have that.

      there's just a shitton of people here.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Re: Dutch determination to clean up after American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your consumption per capita is ten times that of India and China, and you also have a cultural dislike of recycling, because "it's for poor people".

    Stop shifting your mess onto people in the 3rd world. You and your uncontrolled mass-consumption is what has caused the problem, not India or China.

  15. What is wrong with coastal people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It boggles my mind that people by the coast would litter so much they created a plastic island twice the size of TX. That is completely unacceptable. Go inland, like the midwest, and you'll barely see any litter at all and we don't even have an ocean to worry about. You just don't do it because it's ignorant and nobody likes looking at trash. WTF California?

    1. Re:What is wrong with coastal people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no island. There is a region the size of Texas that has a high density of plastic. The outer edges of that have about one plastic bottle for an area the size of a Texas county. The highest densities are about one plastic bottle for an area the size of foot ball field. The images of garbage in the ocean are by the rivers that are used to dispose of garbage.

      Until the 1970s nearly every country that could was dumping their garbage in the oceans.

  16. The post is overly negative - so are the comments by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somebody makes an invention that, in beta form, is flawed. They see a clear path to success so they go about making that happen. Then people come and crap. I remember when conversations on /. were decent, but it's been a while.

  17. Re: Dutch determination to clean up after American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Go ingest some mercury. You will adapt just fine

  18. what percentage of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curious if this did work how many would be needed to reduce the garbage patch by a significant amount. Much of the plastic has moved down in the water table and that's not affected.

    I guess I could go over to their site and look around for info but nah. I only stop by /. these days for the flame wars.

    1. Re:what percentage of plastic by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 150,000,000 tons of plastic in the oceans now, and 8,000,000 tons new each year. Each trap was supposed to clean up 150,000 POUNDS of plastic each year. You would need 2 million of these to clean up what is in the oceans now, and another 100,000 just to get the new waste. Yes. It is a stupid idea, which is why a "17 year old" came up with it.

    2. Re:what percentage of plastic by duinsel · · Score: 1

      You would need 2 million of these to clean up what is in the oceans now, and another 100,000 just to get the new waste.

      While it contributes modestly in the quantity caught, I would not discount the contribution to publicity and awareness on the subject. And the example of doing something about a problem instead of producing just talk.

    3. Re:what percentage of plastic by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      If you want awareness then this is not the way to do it. What is needed is less plastic waste produced, not pretending like you can solve the problem by deploying a technical solution. This is even worse: people will think this will solve the problem, and thus never cut back on plastic production. Stupid Millenial thinking.

    4. Re:what percentage of plastic by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Why would I need it all cleaned up in 1 year? As long as there 106,667 of these then they'll be collecting all new plastic plus a little of the old. Really you only need 300,000 to clean it all up in 10 years.

    5. Re:what percentage of plastic by maestroX · · Score: 1

      It's perfect.
      Politicians have wet dreams associating themselves with ideals because there's really no way to fail and be held accountable.
      What other alternative do you think is available to match economy?

    6. Re:what percentage of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite, because it doesn't perform at even 1% of the spec. See you in 100+ years.

      More practically, this is just an incredibly dumb way to go about things. Either stop the source dumping (western countries don't do it, so Asian ones can stop too), or install real filters on the output of those rivers. The plastic already out there is like CO2 in the atmosphere: You ain't getting it back. It'll eventually decay on its own, and you're just blowing resources trying to get rid of it quicker.

    7. Re:what percentage of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is literally the first prototype. If further iterations can scale by lets say a 1000 the your numbers above become very realistic indeed. And lease don't mix metric and imperial units. It makes my eyes burn.

  19. Re:The post is overly negative - so are the commen by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    The entire idea is flawed and self-serving. 8 million tons of plastic enter the oceans each year. Even if this thing worked 100% you couldn't build enough of them to make an appreciable dent in the incoming waste stream.

  20. So ... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The giant trap is made to catch plastic that the water has broken into tiny pieces and the plastic catchers are also broken into tiny pieces?

    Who would have thought.

  21. Re:'Everything is a tradeoff' ..if you're too stup by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You are still 12 in your head.

    'Better' compression algorithms come at a tradeoff of greater compression time. In the 21st century anyhow, low hanging fruit is long gone.

    You're just a moron who thinks he's a genius, has likely never actually built anything. But you sure love your ideas.

    'Engineering school produces unhirable robots'? You've hung yourself. You understand nothing.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  22. Re:The post is overly negative - so are the commen by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

    Why bother to clean up litter at all? If we reduce the waste stream and clean up over years, we'll improve things. There's no reason to give up before we even start.

  23. Re:The post is overly negative - so are the commen by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and clean it up. Are you not understanding? It would require millions of these things to make any difference (and they would need to work). The point is we need to stop producing it. You cannot clean it up. It is too late for that.

  24. Re:The post is overly negative - so are the commen by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 2

    Where do you get your math? Here's theirs: https://www.theoceancleanup.co...

  25. Seems overly complex by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    The currents determine where things go. And there's a giant trash heap sitting there. Send some barges and scoop the crap up and send them back. The currents will bring the vast majority of it to you.

  26. fecking idiots by bigtreeman · · Score: 0

    Fecking idiots, didn't do reasonable testing, of course the plastic escapes again.
    It broke, is it made of plastic?? fecking idiots
    Want to design a system to catch plastic, get a fisherman, they know the sea, they know how to catch things.
    Don't listen to 17 year old pimply youth, they don't know shit, nice thought bubble, that's all.

    --
    Go well
  27. Re:The post is overly negative - so are the commen by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    It would require millions of these things to make any difference

    Can you show your work on that?

    The nice thing about garbage dumped in the oceans, if there can be said to be any nice thing about it, is that a lot of it actually ends up in several relatively small patches. I've actually the north atlantic garbage patch. Pretty gross the way garbage builds up there. I suspect it's a node where currents create a convergence. Whatever the cause, it at least serves to bring quite a bit of the floating garbage to one place. Millions of these devices wouldn't be needed, though I agree with the other commenter that it would be interesting to find out where you got that number.

    You cannot clean it up. It is too late for that.

    I suspect you were one of those kids who, when your parents were away for a week, did nothing until, on the last day, you looked at the kitchen and slumped your shoulders in defeat that nothing could now be done. Any mess can be cleaned up. Once you decide on what must be done, how to do it is only a detail. Luckily, other people than you are concerning themselves with those details. But please, feel free to continue to sit in your armchair and tell everyone how it can't be done. We appreciate your input.

  28. Re:No problemo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plastic! It's the stuff dreams are made of!

    Plastic! It's the stuff your peen is made of!

  29. Re: Dutch determination to clean up after American by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    I have, literally, never heard anyone say "Recycling is for poor people". It's like a made up argument my nephew uses "Yeah, so this guy said black people were bad, so that's why I got in that fight!"
    I would suggest you take a small look in the mirror and clean up your own house before attacking your fictitious boogeyman.