Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Preps For New Layoffs Despite Billions In Tax Breaks and Regulatory Favors (vice.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: AT&T is preparing for yet another significant round of layoffs according to internal documents obtained by Motherboard. The staff reductions come despite billions in tax breaks and regulatory favors AT&T promised would dramatically boost both investment and job creation. A source at AT&T who asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to speak publicly told Motherboard that company leadership is planning what it's calling a "geographic rationalization" and employment "surplus" reduction that will consolidate some aspects of AT&T operations in 10 major operational hubs in New York, California, Texas, New Jersey, Washington State, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Missouri, and Washington, DC. A spokesperson for AT&T confirmed to Motherboard that it is planning to "adjust" its workforce.

While AT&T has yet to come up with a final, formal internal tally for this new round of looming layoffs, AT&T employees worry the staff reductions could prove to be significant, especially outside of these core areas. Managers are being briefed on the plans now, though AT&T isn't expected to formally announce the specifics until they're finalized later this month. The staff reductions were first announced in an internal memo sent to managers last Friday by Jeff McElfresh, President, Technology & Operations at AT&T. This news comes in the wake of AT&T receiving a $20 billion windfall last quarter courtesy of the Trump administration tax breaks. That's in addition to the friendlier environment AT&T finds itself in as a result of the Trump administration's assault on consumer protections ranging from net neutrality to broadband privacy guidelines.
"To win in this new world, we must continue to lower costs and keep getting faster, leaner, and more agile," McElfresh told employees. "This includes reductions in our organization, and others across the company, which will begin later this month and take place over several months."

28 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think we can take much more of this winning.

    1. Re:Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      better health insurance for less money. Yes some people did pay less and others had to pay more for REAL health insurance vs some of the old junk plans.

    2. Re:Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obamacare brought healthcare to millions of people.
      Trump's "Tax Reform" enriched himself and a few of his his billionaire buddies.
      So yeah. A little different.

    3. Re:Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, "Tax Reform" under Trump did manage to close loopholes that allowed teachers to write off school supplies. For opponents of "Big Teach" this could be considered a big win.

    4. Re: Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      My health and body got worse under Obama. I feel like his Presidency aged me eight years. We are all closer to death because of it.

    5. Re:Just say "No" to Trump 2020. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Umm, no it didn't, The Affordable Care Act required people to PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE. People still go bankrupt due to medical expenses. People still do not have access to affordable healthcare. Even with health insurance plans (which most of them have high deductibles) people still do not go to the doctor because they cannot afford it.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Mammoth Debt... by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 4, Informative

    The poster fails to mention the $180B debt that at & t currently has and that as interest rates rise there's a substantial risk that the company could go bankrupt and need a bail out. They've already publicly committed to reducing their debt load by $20B in 2019. They'll probably need to do a lot more to survive the next big credit crunch.

    1. Re:Mammoth Debt... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bail out? Nah, the country would be way better off if we just auctioned off their assets to smaller companies would would take their place instead of subsidizing their bad behavior.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Mammoth Debt... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, AT&T was already subjected to that fate, but then the parts seem to have reassembled themselves like the liquid metal robot from Terminator 2.

    3. Re: Mammoth Debt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The T1000 has nothing on the monopolized market convergence lead to by capitalism, then stagnated by cronyism.

    4. Re:Mammoth Debt... by imperious_rex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. I checked their balance sheet for 2017 on Yahoo Finance (ticker symbol "T") and their current ratio is almost 1:1 (current assets to current liabilities). That's not good. A reasonably healthy company should have a current ratio of 2:1 or better. Somebody at AT&T has been abusing the company credit card. Too bad it's the rank and file employees who will suffer the pain of managment's ineptitude.

    5. Re:Mammoth Debt... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, AT&T was already subjected to that fate

      The AT&T that was broken up in 1984 was a DIFFERENT COMPANY.

      SBC bought the rights to the AT&T brand and logo in 2005.

      The heart of the original AT&T became Lucent Technologies, and then later Alcatel-Lucent, and I believe they are now part of Nokia.

    6. Re:Mammoth Debt... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it's far more complicated than you represent. Lucent was only one blob spit out from what remained of the core post-breakup AT&T telecommunications company, which itself executed many other acquisitions and spinoffs before SBC bought them (the whole company, not just their name). See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re: Mammoth Debt... by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      Because it isn't the same. Cronyism is getting the politicians to pass laws to rig the market in your favor. Capitalism is creating a better mousetrap so that customer's choose your product over the competitors.

      Cronyism is indirect socialism, in that political favors take the place of consumer choice.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  4. Manpower is never planned on tax breaks by Elfich47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Companies never plan their manpower needs based on tax breaks and incentives. Companies look at the work that needs to get done, the money they have, they billing they expect and from there decide how much manpower they need. These companies are not going to hire people to sit on their thumbs doing nothing. So if they have to much manpower, they layoff. Government tax breaks are not going to affect this process.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  5. Re:Just say "No" to government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    When you take money from people against their will, you're going to allocate it badly.

    Leave people alone.

    That is not the lesson.

    I think the lesson is more like, "Don't elect worshippers of Bullshit Mountain." Right now its more a republican thing, with of course the master bullshitter. It certainly doesn't have to be though, so be wary. Of course I also recommend not encouraging them to reproduce, but that is another matter.

    AT&T lying should surprise no one. The government probably doing jack shit as the result, should of course surprise no one, which is a shame. A competent government would give them the corporate death sentence, and force every member of the board of directors to never be allowed to serve on a similar board again.

    Government is supposed to, among other things, address cases where the free market is ill serving the people. The carcass of AT&T could be absorbed by others, with the likely result being better service for all, eventually. If we have to break AT&T into little pieces every ten years, well, I'm fine with that.

  6. Re:Just say "No" to government. by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    Services people demand... police / fire protection / schools / roads / not getting shot/mugged every-time you walk out the door / building standards so homes don't cave in on in a windstorm, employment regulations to not allow workers or minors chained to desks for 18 hours a day with no toilet breaks, or locked fire escapes that kill everyone in a fire - all those "pesky" regulations that businesses if left to themselves just wouldn't do in the name of profit are all regulated and administered by a "Government". Because arsewipes like you see zero value in educating the youth and would prefer them to grow to be uneducated, unemployable criminals who rob. .... but then we were there as a nation and that's why we need a government And those things cost money.

  7. Re:Agile...agile.... by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    Agile... when you don't want to waste the time or money doing a needs analysis, system sizing or process documentation - which leads to the need to redo over and over and over (aka "sprints") 'cause it never gets done right..

  8. Debt debt debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Second time in a month that /. fails to think finances when it comes to corporate layoffs.

    - AT&T and other large companies borrowed large sums at low interest rates over the last few years for stock buybacks.
    - 2019 is a year with ~20 billion debt due for AT&T and little hope of refinancing it at rates anywhere near the current rate paid.
    - AT&T is rated just above junk status and a balance sheet slip would put it into junk status and drastically raise the cost to finance dept.
    - And many bond covenants have stipulations that the principle is paid faster if the company goes from investment grade rating to junk rating.

    It's easy to look at via FINRA how the company debt vs maturity is trading versus risk free US Treasury issues of similar maturity and coupon rates. Trading at rates well above treasuries is a sign that the bond market thinks the company balance sheet is in poor standing.

    A credit event like Long Term Capital Management, Lehman Brothers, etc would raise borrowing costs to 9% or higher per year and make it nearly impossible for AT&T to refinance its outstanding debt. Thus bankruptcy and likely like GM get bailed out by the US taxpayer with the nice for AT&T benefit of shifting its unfunded pension liabilities to the government run PBGC.

    The credit event would sink stocks and nearly all bonds except for US Treasury bonds; slow the economy, hurt free cash flow, .....

    1. Re:Debt debt debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      ... fails to think finances ...

      No, we're thinking that management should be dismissed too. It's unfair to sacrifice the front line so managers can repeat their mistakes.

    2. Re:Debt debt debt by dryeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps they shouldn't have borrowed money for stock buybacks. Wasn't that illegal not long ago?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  9. Re:Moscow Donald Preps for Prison by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    $10,000 cash reward for the above person's real name and home address.

    No questions asked.

    Melania Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington DC, 37188

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:Nope. I meant those "basic" services, too. by stealth_finger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Move to other countries until you desire governance again. There are plenty of places you can find zero government intrusion into your life. Stop whining, get moving.

    I hear Somalia is nice this time of year.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  11. Nope, not actually the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem is that power will not let you complain about this. You will be a radical, a communist, a know-nothing idiot who wants us back in the stone age or to give all your wealth to you, you greedy bastard....

    The rhetoric is force fed to society. Same reason why society is "too stupid" to stop falling for religious woo (see the new agism bollocks, replacing christianity for those who find society able to let them stop falling for *christianity*, just not for woo "explanations").

    It isn't that society is TOO STUPID, it's that the power structure is forcing a propaganda war to stop you complaining.

    So you will blame the left, the right, the immigrants, the managers, the patriarchy, the SJWs, the blacks, the chinese, ANYONE but those who are running the propaganda because in a capitalist society money means power, so you cannot fight those with money, you cannot BLAME those with money. So you have to blame it on some other identifiable group. ANY group.

    And, having misdiagnosed the problem, any fixes done to that problem will not fix the actual issue, and so it spirals out of control and we "fall for it again".

    1. Re:Nope, not actually the problem by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

      The problem is that power will not let you complain about this. You will be a radical, a communist, a know-nothing idiot who wants us back in the stone age or to give all your wealth to you, you greedy bastard....

      The rhetoric is force fed to society. Same reason why society is "too stupid" to stop falling for religious woo (see the new agism bollocks, replacing christianity for those who find society able to let them stop falling for *christianity*, just not for woo "explanations").

      It isn't that society is TOO STUPID, it's that the power structure is forcing a propaganda war to stop you complaining.

      So you will blame the left, the right, the immigrants, the managers, the patriarchy, the SJWs, the blacks, the chinese, ANYONE but those who are running the propaganda because in a capitalist society money means power, so you cannot fight those with money, you cannot BLAME those with money. So you have to blame it on some other identifiable group. ANY group.

      And, having misdiagnosed the problem, any fixes done to that problem will not fix the actual issue, and so it spirals out of control and we "fall for it again".

      Although I'm not a liberal I think one of the greatest slogans in recent times is "we are the 99%". I suspect that you like that notion too. However the 99% includes a great many Christians, a majority of white people, SJWs, both AntiFa and Nazis, and just about everything else under the sun. I don't like everyone in that mix however I have to put my dislike aside if the notion of stopping the 1% from taking everything is to be achieved. I mention this because the sooner we can keep the 1% from dividing us the sooner we can get some economic justice. So if you want to not 'fall for it again' stop making fun of Christians and keep your eye on the ball of economic justice. Neither the R nor D party in it's current form will get us there, so there's a lot of work to do.

  12. What AT&T is ( likely ) doing by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This entire process is about the stupid amount of debt AT&T is now holding due to the recent buying spree it has been on as of late.

    Here's a passage that isn't in the original story:

    " It's critical for us to bring employees together to increase the pace of innovation and further develop the right skills in a more open, flexible and efficient work environment. Therefore, our collaboration zones and hub cities become even more integral. "

    I read that as the whole " Office 2.0 " bullshit where your workspace is shared with everyone else. They like to claim " collaboration " but, in reality, they're just being cheap.

    " further develop the right skills " is downright laughable as AT&T considers training an expense vs an investment. This is why you have the service you do because NO ONE is trained in how to do their job anymore so everyone basically wings it as best they can. Corporate will deny it, but ask any normal employee the last time they saw any standard / formal training* in regards to how to do their job and they will likely tell you Ed Whittacre was still the CEO.

    *Some of you will question why this is needed, but remember new hardware arrives all the time. It's akin to being fluent in Cisco for years and they plop a Juniper down in front of you and say " make it work, we're shifting everything new over to Juniper ". When you put critical or customer traffic on this, it's rather important to know what you're doing. ( In my opinion anyway )

    Another thing the original story is unaware of is the fact that AT&T is looking at all the real estate it owns ( and it's quite a bit ) to determine if any given building can be shut down and sold off. Basically, if the building doesn't contain enough critical infrastructure for serving the area it resides within, there's a good chance it's on the list. If it contains just a call center, there's a good chance it's already been sold. Their real estate is worth quite a bit and is probably the most efficient method of raising capitol needed to pay down that debt.

    I say enough because there are several buildings that are already on the list to be vacated that DO contain systems that have to be moved before it can be sold. These buildings are basically regional locations where network connections across the State consolidate at the distribution layer. All of these connections have to be moved onto new architecture ( in progress ) and each location has a desired timeline for completion. We're talking hundreds and possibly thousands of sites that are fed from these locations that have to be moved. It will take a considerable amount of time ( several years ), money and people to complete.

    The problem is, if they continue to slash headcount, they're not going to have enough people left to do the work required to meet those deadlines. As it stands today, with the current headcount, those deadlines are already in trouble. Telling them this tends to fall on deaf ears. Guess they'll figure it out when the deadlines come and go.

    What tends to irk me most is:

    They keep buying shit with money they don't have. ( DirecTv / Time Warner )
    The money AT&T WASTED on the failed T-Mobile merger was ~$5B
    The money AT&T wastes on stupid shit like " Stadium Naming Rights " and the like
    An executives yearly bonus is more than a non-executive type makes their entire LIFE

    Yet, laying people off is their go to answer for saving money :|

  13. So ban stock buy backs by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they're primarily used to boost the price so that the CEOs get a big paycheck since their bonuses are tied to (and often paid in) stock. This is _exactly_ why stock buy backs were illegal (until Reagan made them legal).

    Folks like Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders would be happy to do this if we'd give them more left wing colleges in congress. But these are "Job killing regulations" right? Except that what's really killing jobs is that we let the ruling class gamble with all the money in the country and when they go bust they come out smelling like roses.

    I don't think we can let them go bust, either. We're in a hostage situation and always will be without government oversight. We need new rules to protect jobs. To wit:

    1. Ban Stock Buy backs.
    2. Require public companies to have 50% employee representation on their board of directors or they don't get a charter (and the protections therein).
    3. Bring back Glass-Stegal.
    4. Undo Bush Jr's commodities market deregulation. Make folks who buy commodities take possession of them so they can't skim 10% off our food supply.

    There's lots more. Liz Warren has a fairly comprehensive anti-corruption law she wants to enact.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/