Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Password Sharing May Soon Be Impossible Due To New AI Tracking (independent.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Independent: A video software firm has come up with a way to prevent people from sharing their account details for Netflix and other streaming services with friends and family members. UK-based Synamedia unveiled the artificial intelligence software at the CES 2019 technology trade show in Las Vegas, claiming it could save the streaming industry billions of dollars over the next few years. The AI system developed by Synamedia uses machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods. The idea is to spot instances of customers sharing their account credentials illegally and offering them a premium shared account service that will authorize a limited level of password sharing. The company said it is already carrying out trials with a number of pay-TV operators but did not reveal which ones.

151 comments

  1. Simple solution: Charge per stream by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a real simple solution.

    Just charge per stream.

    Share your password with 50 people. You get billed at the Tier 50 level.

    They could even have a family plan so the first 5 streams have a base rate, and charge for every X streams over that.

    Why do they "need" AI to solve First. World. Problems. ?

    1. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Drethon · · Score: 2

      Why do they "need" AI to solve First. World. Problems. ?

      Because it makes better news for the stocks?

    2. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they "need" AI to solve First. World. Problems. ?

      They don't. For example:

      "......uses machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods

      Any third-rate hack programmer could easily throw together software that would do that.

      No "AI" or "Machine Learning" needed.

      Netflix bought themselves some digital snake oil.

    3. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      harder problem than you're treating it...

      suppose:
      i have 1 account, with 1 dependent (wife)
      between the 2 of us we have probably 20 devices with netflix and other services installed (hulu, prime video, hbo now, plex, etc.)
      visit family out of state, use their at-home gym which doesnt have netflix, sign into my account on their gym tv
      watch netflix in their media room, sign in on another one of their tv's

      problems for ai:
      ai will likely have issues flagging and denying my service because i have traveled out of state or even out of my own zipcode

      problems for tiers:
      how many tiers am i on? 2 people legitimately sharing 1 account with literally dozens of legitimate logins and frequent usages across a very large geographic topology.

      problem for both solutions:
      resetting/reformatting devices tends to cause problems with device fingerprinting and usage profiling which will skew how they count my streaming 'tiers' as well as my ai usage model

      maybe a better solution:
      real effort in modeling principals (users and devices) and allowing family plans or better yet, temporary logins, so i can log in with a otu password that works on a device for a week, then forces a profile logout. Also, better principal modeling could allow migrating between accounts for individual users as some of the users below are complaining about.

    4. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean you'd get charged more after watching 5 shows/movies? Or are you talking about concurrent streams, which are already limited by plan (basic = 1, standard = 2, premium = 4)?

    5. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

      They want to stop you from sharing your password with your brother who lives on the opposite coast and watches TV at a different time than you. There would only be one stream, but at different times.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is bullshit. WHY does the location even matter if you are paying per stream???

      i.e.
      If I travel outside the country I get hit by their bullshit geo-IP blocking. I'm *paying* for the fucking service but can't use it -- all because I'm out of the country??? WTF! (Yes, I know its because of the greed of the Content Creators who license their IP and not technically Netflix's fault but this is still bullshit.)

      All these shenanigans do is just drive people to use proxies.

    7. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use stream at home, daughter uses one at college, son uses 3rd stream at another university and my spouse while traveling for work. How will they screw that up? Im sure they will...

    8. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by scamper_22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well let's go through all the business problems.

      One of the biggest benefits of Netflix is it's simplicity. I never have to check the billing. It's the same price every month. I don't have to watch the usage like I do on other services or worry about a crazy number of packages.

      So even if charging by stream would be rare, it's still that thing in the back of your mind. Like watching your internet usage cap. You also have to have more support with people calling in wondering when they used their 6th stream and disputing bills...

      You also want to be careful about cutting people off just for streams. Maybe they really are on vacation and are watching netflix. Maybe you actually want some leeway for some general sharing. Like a kid going off to university using his 'home' parents account. You don't want to antoganize customers whose perception is they are legitimate.

      AI is probably just a buzzword :P but if you can really get the data to determine those mass shared accounts where its beyond one household's or one family's general usage and then pursue those... more power to them.

    9. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by kenh · · Score: 1

      No, they want to capture and upsell users that use multiple simultaneous streams.

      The AI system developed by Synamedia uses machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods.

      --
      Ken
    10. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Similar time periods is not "the same time"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      All your problems are solved with 2FA. Enable 2FA on the main account holder and any subaccount holders. If you detect the same account/subaccount accessing two streams at the same time require a 2FA prompt before continuing.

    12. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      There is a real simple solution. Just charge per stream.

      Isn't this what they already do? The plan we have in Canada allows us to stream to two devices simultaneously and we have 4 profiles on the account. I am going to be really mad if, when I go to the US or Europe for a conference, it blocks me from accessing Netflix because my wife or kids are watching TV back home.

    13. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      They already have tiers that more or less do it fairly... you can't share your password with 50 people, because they do limit how many streams you can run simultaneously. 2 households can easily hit that limit to the point where they are agervating eachother. In short the most password sharing really does, is let 2 households go for the price of 1. IMO alternative algorythms to say, hit people up when your already limited to 2-4 simultanious streams will more likely have false positives when say a 2 person household has 1 person that travels regularly for work etc...

    14. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by hawk · · Score: 1

      I am 3 timezones east of my home at the moment, visiting a child and grandchildren, while my wife and children are at home. I have a two stream account.

      Would it find this sudden bilocation "suspicious"?

      hawk

    15. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best reason: Because they don't really have a problem to begin with.

      Their hardware is paid for, their shows are already produced with the same accounting hollywood has used for years. They are personally comfortable.

      Assuming all the other obvious cynical points are accounted for, they're still just playing a video game and their stock price is the only score they get.

    16. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by kalieaire · · Score: 1

      I already pay for multiple streams.

      * Watch on 1 screen at a time in Standard Definition. Download videos on 1 phone or tablet.
      * Watch on 2 screens at a time. HD available. Download videos on 2 phones or tablets.
      * Watch on 4 screens at a time. HD and Ultra HD available. Download videos on 4 phones or tablets.

      How does this change anything?

    17. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geo locking is entirely Netflix fault. They cheaper out instead of paying for rights to stream in available reasons.

    18. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix didn't buy anything.

    19. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Netflix already has limits on how many devices can stream at once under a particular plan. The can tell how many devices are streaming Netflix at a time on one account. Nothing more is needed. As long as the limit of devices per account is not exceeded, there should not be a problem if the devices are in different location. Suppose a family member is on a business trip or vacation? Suppose a family member is in the hospital? There can be any number of reasons that a Netflix account that allows more than one device to stream at a time could have devices at two distant locations streaming at the same time without there being any intent for someone to get free services!

    20. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did netflix even buy this? I recall that in the past they didn't mind password sharing, instead they relied on the number of streams. HBO said something similar. I think this is more for the likes of OTT MVPDs. Their contracts with content providers are typically per-subscriber, and the content providers are more than likely pressuring them to put a stop to it. Netflix has to deal with region-based licensing with many of its content providers, hence the VPN block, but I don't believe their contracts are per-subscriber based, rather it's per-stream based. Also, as far as I know, Netflix original content is essentially region free so long as you have a Netflix subscription anywhere in the world, but your geolocation determines what third party content you get.

    21. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall that in the past they didn't mind password sharing, instead they relied on the number of streams.

      Yeah, especially since their programming sucks now. Are they still growing?

    22. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not even hard. When we rolled out our streaming service 10+ years ago we would pester the users we thought we could get to sign up for their own account once per quarter and knew we were better off with the rest of them using the service for free and talking about it. The only thing that has changed is that Netflix, et al don't need the word of mouth like they use to.

    23. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      You don't want to antoganize customers whose perception is they are legitimate.

      This is hard evidence that they do want to antagonize them.

      My Sister in law regularly comes to my house and logs in on her Netflix account. Since we are not avid TV users, it probably stays "on the Netflix channel" for several days before anyone bothers to change it. I suspect the same thing happens when she visits other family members.

      We won't pay for Netflix (we have free-to-air, and its fine for us). My sister-in-law would stick to Youtube if Netflix charged her more, and is unlikely to understand complex billing strategies.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    24. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Which is bullshit. WHY does the location even matter if you are paying per stream???

      i.e. If I travel outside the country I get hit by their bullshit geo-IP blocking. I'm *paying* for the fucking service but can't use it -- all because I'm out of the country??? WTF! (Yes, I know its because of the greed of the Content Creators who license their IP and not technically Netflix's fault but this is still bullshit.)

      All these shenanigans do is just drive people to use proxies.

      Blocked? When I travel outside my country I get the Netflix selection available under the licensing contracts for the country I'm currently in. The main thing that would worry me with this new AI based sharing detector is that it would malfunction as badly as the one built into Microsoft products which constantly nags me to enter the MS subscription password, seemingly every time I cross a border.

    25. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by sosume · · Score: 1

      No account sharing == no Netflix. It's as simple as that. So instead of having two or three viewers, they will have none. That will be real funny for the stock price. Alternatively I could have the family VPN into our home network to access Netflix. Happy now?

      The end of Netflix is near anyway, their programming sucks donkey balls nowadays with dull "bingeworthy" series that turn sour after only a couple of episodes, endless unfunny stand-up "comedy" and heavily politically motivated "documentaries". The only thing worthy of watching nowadays is ST:DSC and even that is a mediocre show.

    26. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did netflix even buy this? I recall that in the past they didn't mind password sharing, instead they relied on the number of streams. HBO said something similar. I think this is more for the likes of OTT MVPDs. Their contracts with content providers are typically per-subscriber, and the content providers are more than likely pressuring them to put a stop to it. Netflix has to deal with region-based licensing with many of its content providers, hence the VPN block, but I don't believe their contracts are per-subscriber based, rather it's per-stream based. Also, as far as I know, Netflix original content is essentially region free so long as you have a Netflix subscription anywhere in the world, but your geolocation determines what third party content you get.

      You know what else is also region-free? Bittorrent plus a good VPN.

      It's as though the studios don't want my money.

    27. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's what they say, but the first victims will probably be kids who live at more than one house. They could discriminate based on user agent and device type but here's predicting they won't.

      Which, frankly, won't bother most kids who might be amused by Netflix but you can take their YouTube from their cold atrophied hands.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    28. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do this already. And Netflix has officially stated that it is ok if you share your password with friends and family because you pay for and have a limited number of simultaneous streams.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    29. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      "Why do they "need" AI..."

      This is nowhere close to AI. I've worked on reporting software that linked in the MaxMind GeoIP database to locate users by IP address. All they need to catch cheaters is a very simple query/report looking for a few very simple things. Claiming they need AI for it is ridiculous.

      It wouldn't surprise me if "Synamedia" claimed it was AI to get more money, or perhaps tried to convince Netflix that they needed to use AI tools to justify the sale. Companies lying to make a big sale is not new.

    30. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by houghi · · Score: 1

      They could easily say "Outside of your legal part of the world, only Netflix content can be seen"

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    31. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that solve anything when you can simply share the second form of authentication as well?

      2FA is treated like some magic silver bullet in this industry

    32. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I don't normally call people a dumbass, but really if it were that simple, don't you think they would have implemented it by now? These guys are motivated by millions, maybe billions of dollars. An idea as trivial as the one you have expressed is likely one of the first things they considered.

      Your job, should you choose to accept it, it is to figure out possible reasons why your idea wouldn't work. You already know it doesn't work because it is not being implemented, so you can be sure, if you look hard enough, you will find why it won't work.

      I don't mean dumbass in a mean way, more of a "are you serious?" way. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    33. Re: Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The end of Netflix is near anyway

      lol ok yokel

    34. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI could be used for a lot better things. For example, if each person in the house has their own profile, and we all watch a few episode of show together there should be a way to easily update each profile with the episodes watched. Or how about a way to tell Netflix I will not watch a show or movie ever. I don't do horror movies, and some of the artwork needs to go from my profile. The same can be said for dad who would like reality cooking shows to vanish from his view.

    35. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Just charge per stream.

      Because people don't like terms of service that say they can be charged thousands of dollars a month if their account gets hacked. Such things make real bad PR when they happen.

      Because they want to charge per person, not per stream. Like most services their model capacity planning expects much less than 100% account utilization. If you shared you account with 5 people that coordinated to a single stream at a time, but with ~100% utilization overall, that'd be a "loss" for them.

    36. Re:Simple solution: Charge per stream by dimmthewitted · · Score: 1

      They already DO charge per streaming.
      The $7.99 Basic plan allows streaming on only one screen, the $10.99 Standard allows two active, and the $13.99 Premium offers four active sessions.

      They are trying to maximize their profits on the accounts that say, "Hey Mom you can use my Netflix when I'm not using it."

  2. Let my ex take her profile with her by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still share my Netflix with my ex. She's willing to pay for Netflix herself, but there is a problem. She can't take her watching history, ratings, and her list of bookmarked titles to her new account. When asked, Netflix say "meh, just start over".

    Come on dudes, your devs could easily add account merges and splits (and while at it, give me an option to let me watch the end credits in full screen in peace). I'm not motivated enough to write a scraper/saver to copy her profile from my account to hers using Greasemonkey (the watch list is probably easy to get, but the entirely to watch progress and the simulation needed to bring every timestamp over might be harder on my end), and you guys don't seem either.

    But hey, AI is cool. Decent profile handling is so meh. Don't forget the blockchain.

    1. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

      In the exact same position. Ex and I still share a profile because it it tuned to our preferences.

    2. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > She can't take her watching history, and her list of bookmarked titles to her new account.
      > Come on dudes, your devs could easily add account merges and splits

      Agreed! That would be REALLY nice Quality of Life improvement. You are spot on about watching history being "locked" to an account. This isn't fucking rocket science -- just some basic computer science.

      Even worse is when old content gets pulled. How am I supposed to add it to my "Want to watch again list". I can't because the page no longer exists.

      The Netflix UI is a complete clusterfuck at times. When you search for content that they don't have rights / license to they instead show "other related" shows. NO! I want to go to the entity I _searched_ for AND I want give you FEEDBACK that I'm interested in by pressing "Notify me when this becomes available". Kind of like a "Wish List". Gee, apparently this is too fucking hard to figure out!

      HBO Go has a really nice feature "Leaving soon..." Content that will be going away at the end of the month. THAT's how you keep engagement high. INFORM people what they can't soon watch so they are more likely to watch it.

      That thumbs up/down rating system is also shit. The 5 star system allows me to grade something as "Great!", "Good", "Meh", "Bad", "Total crap". Lacking fine granularity is NOT helpful.

      Do they even USE their product???

    3. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apparently her preference was a larger penis.

    4. Re: Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh totally. As if I could care less about the profile. If your ex put all the time into the profile then by all means keep it. It isnt like some tit for tat baloney.

    5. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL you told that guy, buddy

    6. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do... but they thought it important to help shield disasters like Amy Schumer specials from getting massive 1 star ratings right out of the gate.

      Captcha: positive

    7. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Similar problem. When my parents visit me, they use their Netflix account on my TV so that I can listen to streaming on my long drive without hitting my one-screen limit. This means at least one TV is signed in to their account. Switching accounts is a pain in the backside, so I just leave it that way. It would be far easier if a profile could be shared between their account and mine so when they choose their profile, it counts against their screen limit without spending ten minutes searching for and typing their password with a stupid on-screen keyboard every time we switch users.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      LOL, Burn! Too funny.

    9. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Her? Him.

    10. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no "screen limit" only a simultaneous stream limit. You can have as many "screens" as you want.

    11. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't used star ratings for a couple years now.

    12. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably she's your ex for a reason. Just tell her to fuck off and stop spending any time doing anything for her. She's not your responsibility anymore mate.

    13. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do, but according to company policy they have to look down every 5 seconds.

    14. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why she left? Probably fed up with you ranting on about Tesla and Musk.

    15. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you put a lot of effort into watching TV. Maybe you should go out and ride a bike, or something.

      #VoteDemocrat

    16. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone breaks up on bad terms.

    17. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I still share my Netflix with my ex.

      I don't really think this is there problem.

      I spend a bit of time in developing nations, there are a fair few people reselling Nexflix logins. You can easily resell a 4 screen account to 15-20 people by sharing the password. They change the password each month to ensure that people still pay. I think these are the people Netflix is looking for.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Agreed! That would be REALLY nice Quality of Life improvement. You are spot on about watching history being "locked" to an account. This isn't fucking rocket science -- just some basic computer science.

      I can't imagine caring about anything less than the viewing history of my Netflix account.

    19. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Po-tay-to, po-tah-to. I'm pretty sure everybody understood what I meant.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Let my ex take her profile with her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still share my Netflix with my ex.

      LOL. Enough said.

  3. Not sure why netflix would implement this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netflix charges per simultaneous stream, sharing your password either means you cant use it or you need a bigger plan which earns them more money.

    1. Re:Not sure why netflix would implement this by Kyogreex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, and if people start getting messages that they need to spend more because they're on a business trip and their kid in another state is watching at the same time (and similar scenarios) when they're already paying for the two-stream service, I would imagine they'll start getting pissed.

    2. Re:Not sure why netflix would implement this by kenh · · Score: 1

      Why would a subscriber paying for two streams be "flagged" for using two simultaneous streams?

      The AI system developed by Synamedia uses machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods.

      The goal is to upsell single-stream subscribers and convince them to become multi-stream subscribers:

      The idea is to spot instances of customers sharing their account credentials illegally and offering them a premium shared account service that will authorize a limited level of password sharing.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Not sure why netflix would implement this by teg · · Score: 1

      Netflix charges per simultaneous stream, sharing your password either means you cant use it or you need a bigger plan which earns them more money.

      They charge for simultaneous streams within your household - thus, you are not allowed to e.g. split the cost of one plan between 4 families and they'll just use the samme account. Note that the number fo streams is only aspect of their plans - my plan has 4 simultaneous streams, but we are just two in the household. The reason why my wife and I has the premium plan is UHD.

  4. This will impact satellite internet users by jwbales · · Score: 1

    We live in a rural area where our only available internet connection is by way of satellite. One result is that no location service ever knows where we are. They will think we are in California one minute and Ohio the next. If I understand this new technology correctly, this might hamper our use of services such as Netflix.

    1. Re:This will impact satellite internet users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's AI. If that's your normal behavior, than it is not unusual for you and it won't be flagged. AI is not
      if user.loc(current) != user.loc(last):
      disconnect(user)
      user.bill += 5.00

    2. Re:This will impact satellite internet users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in a rural area where our only available internet connection is by way of satellite. One result is that no location service ever knows where we are. They will think we are in California one minute and Ohio the next. If I understand this new technology correctly, this might hamper our use of services such as Netflix.

      And that is where the marketing genius of "AI" comes in. It's AI. It will know that. Throw in some Blockchain and some XML for old times sake for a juicy news release.

    3. Re: This will impact satellite internet users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if it's normal for me to share my password then it won't flag it.

    4. Re:This will impact satellite internet users by kenh · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. Their issue is users with multiple simultaneous streams that have only paid for a singe stream.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:This will impact satellite internet users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if that's the case.. then that's on netflix for not limiting a single-stream account to one stream at a time. and that's something they could do now without any fancy "AI".

      but, it's not. it's to nail those who share or sell logins to accounts to people across the country.. or across the globe, for that matter... regardless of how many streams are permitted on their account plan.

    6. Re:This will impact satellite internet users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we DO understand...that Netflix ALREADY knows when you exceed the number of devices on your plan, and doesn't allow more streams than you are paying for. No AI or new software is needed, what they already have in place is working just fine. As long as you are not exceeding the number of devices on your plan, LOCATION SHOULD NOT MATTER!!!!!!!

  5. Works for me! by SirAstral · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually hate this service but everyone in the family wants it... so I pay for two of them.

    I hope they come down on me so I can get rid of it entirely.

    This will only lose them money in the long run likely because the rule of piracy is if you make content difficult to get a hold of, piracy become so easy that they go there instead of with your bullshit draconian DRM schemes for money.

    1. Re:Works for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you have two Synamedia accounts? I can't believe everyone in your family wants software to search webserver logs :P
      You don't even need an account, you simply buy their software and install it in your video streaming service that you sell.

      Unless you are referring to Netflix, in which case never fear that was just a flat out blatant slashdot editor lie.

      netflix allows 5 people in the same household to share one account, and each gets their own profile to keep watch-later lists and viewing history separate.
      See https://help.netflix.com/en/node/10421?ui_action=kb-article-popular-categories

      In other words netflix allows specifically the very thing BeauHD claims netflix doesn't want happening.

    2. Re:Works for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont need AI to detect 2 internet IPs using the same account at the same time. And they allow 3 family members to use it anyway and they are allowed to be on the road. So this isnt for netflix. Thats just a brand in a headline, and as irrelevant as AI.

  6. don't need AI for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Garbage hype. You don't need AI to recognize when a user is streaming from 2 different locations at near the same time. You need an algorithm. A very simple algorithm.

    1. Re:don't need AI for that by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Except that without some intelligence, artificial or human (if it still exists), it won't work.
      I have two internet connections, load balanced, and which one is used depends on which one currently has the least traffic. They show up as two different states.
      Others may share a VPN, and get the same location for two different users.

    2. Re:don't need AI for that by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Garbage hype. You don't need AI to recognize when a user is streaming from 2 different locations at near the same time. You need an algorithm. A very simple algorithm.

      Algorithmic Information.

      Tada! Now we get to use the whiz-bang "AI" in our headline!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
  7. Slow Down! by Barny · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is nothing in the source that hints that Netflix are at all interested in using this, and there is nothing at all that links them with Netflix.

    This company and/or the various "news" outlets spreading this are piggybacking on Netflix's name to push a new tech with FUD.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
    1. Re:Slow Down! by j-beda · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is nothing in the source that hints that Netflix are at all interested in using this, and there is nothing at all that links them with Netflix.

      Further, while Netflix might someday stop this type of activity, they already monetize it by charging subscribers higher prices if they want to be able to view multiple streams simultaneously.

    2. Re:Slow Down! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Netflix actively enables password sharing with its user profiles.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Slow Down! by hawk · · Score: 1

      they already do this.
      I pay an extra buck or two for two stream, and coul;d have four for another couple of bucks.

      Instead, if two kids are streaming, I flip a coin for who gives it up so my wife and I can watch.

      hawk

    4. Re:Slow Down! by j-beda · · Score: 1

      they already do this.

      That's what I said.

      I think.

      At least that is what I tried to say.

    5. Re:Slow Down! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in the source that hints that Netflix are at all interested in using this, and there is nothing at all that links them with Netflix.

      My thoughts exactly. Looking for access at different geographical locations is so obvious that if they had wanted to do it they would have done so. My guess is that at some point they will do it but want to increase the number of users first - and allowing people to piggyback is a good way of doing this. when they finally do enforce this I expect a lot of piggybackers will be so used to Netflix that they will get their own accounts.

    6. Re:Slow Down! by teg · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in the source that hints that Netflix are at all interested in using this, and there is nothing at all that links them with Netflix.

      Further, while Netflix might someday stop this type of activity, they already monetize it by charging subscribers higher prices if they want to be able to view multiple streams simultaneously.

      They don't mind people having multiple streams at once - that's even part of their plans (basic: 1, standard: 2, premium: 4) alongside other benefits. What they try to identify is people sharing their accounts beyond their household, which is against their TOS.

    7. Re:Slow Down! by j-beda · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in the source that hints that Netflix are at all interested in using this, and there is nothing at all that links them with Netflix.

      Further, while Netflix might someday stop this type of activity, they already monetize it by charging subscribers higher prices if they want to be able to view multiple streams simultaneously.

      They don't mind people having multiple streams at once - that's even part of their plans (basic: 1, standard: 2, premium: 4) alongside other benefits. What they try to identify is people sharing their accounts beyond their household, which is against their TOS.

      I don't really see any evidence that they "try to identify people sharing their accounts beyond their household" as I am personally aware of multiple instances where this occurs across huge geographical distances which are trivially easy to flag, and I know of nobody ever being cut off or even warned against the practice, despite what their TOS may say. At the least, they are not "trying" very hard.

  8. Why pay to be treated like a criminal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I download movies and watch them at my leisure for free.

    No way I am going to PAY for a "service" which does business like Netflix does.

    Now, you could say I am violating copyright, but all I'm doing is watching video which is streamed from a server which is beyond the grasp of the MPAA. I'm not the person breaking the law, I am just availing myself of entertainment which is free for the watching.

    I might pay Netflix for a service which was worth using, but since Netflix has become progressively less useful AND they are now going to start tracking users, they can take a long walk off a short pier.

    Fuck 'em.

    1. Re:Why pay to be treated like a criminal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a copyright holder decided to take action against you for downloading infringing content, they would, in fact, win.

      The only thing protecting you in this case is that you probably just personally haven't done anything to get on their radar to be noticed. However, you most certainly can still face applicable penalties for copyright infringement if they had any proof of your downloading of infringing content (regardless of the source jurisdiction).

  9. Why not use the AI to find VPN users? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    If the "AI" was so smart why did it not understand the problem and go for the VPN users too?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Why not use the AI to find VPN users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VPN users are criminals too. What are they hiding from?

  10. For all of the hype by edi_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Basically it just comes down to "... as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods." You don't need 'machine learning' for that. I suspect Netflix does this behind the scenes and lets it roll for the most common instances of household members watching separately. A while back Amazon clamped down on multiple accounts without AI. I doubt anyone will buy/invest in this firm.

    I will continue to invest my own money in brick and mortar companies like Sears and Macy's.

    1. Re:For all of the hype by wiretrip · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, this is definitely *not* AI. I am beginning to tire of all this...

  11. good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the rapidly dwindling selection of movies and progressively limited interface, the first arbitrary AI lockout will be a great excuse to drop Netflix altogether.

  12. pay per device or per steam at the same time? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    pay per device or per steam at the same time?

    1. Re: pay per device or per steam at the same time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do this already...

      You get 2 streams with the base, or up to 4.

      Netflix is making a lot of money on inertia. If they screw up, they'll lose a lot of subscribers.

  13. Netflix and chill? Soon to be, Plex and chill.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of trying to figure out how to make life harder for couples, how about making it easier for them to watch together. There's still no concept of shared viewing in Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and other services like there is with watch2gether. When my gf and I aren't near each other it'd be nice to sync up and watch things together. Right now we do that by saying "1 2 3 go" and hitting play. These jackasses are wasting time worrying about how to block their customer's enjoyment instead of enhancing it, competition is going to come around and knock you on reality's ass. The whole point of netflix and chill is to have quality time with someone, morons. People will go back to stealing using kodi, rabb.it, or plex if you block them. You aren't going to block anything but your own revenue source.

  14. That's not AI by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    that's painfully obvious. Netflix can stop password sharing anytime they want. They don't do it because they're smart enough to know it means a loss of subscribers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: That's not AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it isnt even expensive. I cant imagine throwing a fit over a Netflix account. I still pay the bill for my exes Netflix account. I have no idea if I will continue to pay it, but it is almost too cheap to bother changing it

    2. Re:That's not AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's painfully obvious. Netflix can stop password sharing anytime they want. They don't do it because they're smart enough to know it means a loss of subscribers.

      This. Netflix is ok to pay for as long as there are four of us paying. Having to pay for it myself would change my torrenting from 60% to 100%.

  15. Killing the killer feature. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    When I signed up, It was for streaming to X amount of screens. There was no mention of "In a single geographical location". My family and I are all over the damn place- all the damn time, and we all have NF going with our own profiles during our downtime. It's actually easier and more convenient than just torrenting my media.

    Listen Netflix. This is your best feature. It's why I signed up. If you add hoops, captchas, and other DRMish garbage, I'm cancelling my service. I don't care if you call it an AI feature. I don't care that you wan't more money. This is the service you sold me. It will simply be easier to spend the same money on VPN service, and teach the fam how to torrent instead.

    Don't give me the tired copyright infringement is stealing bullshit either. We don't feel bad about not paying for the media, because your industry don't feel bad about collecting on it for 90 years after the authors death. We're happy to take it back, because the entertainment industry as a whole feels no shame stealing decades of media from the public every time you buy another copyright extension. There is no moral high ground.

    You found the sweet spot, Netflix. Don't push it. Your competing with torrents. Every-single-thing selection, no ads, privacy respecting, locally stored, play on any device, in any location, as often as you like torrents.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Killing the killer feature. by kenh · · Score: 1

      You seriously didn't even bother to read the summary, did you?

      When I signed up, It was for streaming to X amount of screens. There was no mention of "In a single geographical location". My family and I are all over the damn place- all the damn time, and we all have NF going with our own profiles during our downtime.

      Dude, Netflix offers three tiers of service, a single stream, two simultaneous, and 5 simultaneous streams... there is no mention of "in a single geographic area" except when streaming SIMULTANEOUSLY in multiple locations and only having paid for a SINGLE STREAM - see the difference?

      It's actually easier and more convenient than just torrenting my media.

      Listen Netflix. This is your best feature. It's why I signed up. If you add hoops, captchas, and other DRMish garbage, I'm cancelling my service. I don't care if you call it an AI feature.

      Netflix hasn't implemented this "feature" - it's a software offering a small company says a company like Netflix could use - re-read the summary.

      I don't care that you wan't more money. This is the service you sold me. It will simply be easier to spend the same money on VPN service, and teach the fam how to torrent instead.

      BS, the only thing a company like Netflix would use this software for would be to find people using more simultaneous streams then they paid for, they don't care where your streams are, they care about how many streams you use and how many you pay for.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Killing the killer feature. by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Listen Netflix. This is your best feature. It's why I signed up. If you add hoops, captchas, and other DRMish garbage, I'm cancelling my service"

      I don't share my account *or* viewing with ANYONE, and yet I have to pay the same as someone like you, who supports several people using it a whole lot. Or the people who share their account with several friends. So, to me, I would love it if other people were more restricted and paid for their increased usage such that my price could go down by half or less and Netflix still does fine or better (INCLUDING those extreme users who drop it completely). For all those who drop, they could possibly gain far more users willing to pay $5/mo who were not willing to pay $11 or whatnot. I have no data to support that, either way.

      Of course, it won't necessarily work out that way, they could just keep the same pricing AND enforce less use, where everyone loses. I am just making the point that what is a "great deal" for many, is a "sucky deal" for others who use it a total of just several hours a month on a single device. It is the same thing with cable- all the advertising is about "A single charge for your whole household and unlimited TV's!! Great Value!" Again, I have one person and one TV. So for me, it is the absolute worst possible deal. I am, in essence, subsidizing it for all the multi-person households by paying 200% to 500% more per person than they are.

    3. Re:Killing the killer feature. by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      As with many things, legitimate users subsidize freeloaders.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:Killing the killer feature. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Actually, You do *NOT* pay the same as everybody else. I pay for premium service, which allows 4 simultaneous screens at once. The standard sub, which I'll assume your paying for, allows two screens at once. Even if you only use one at a time, your paying for the two.

      Your buying enough ice-cream to feed you and a friend and just throwing away the other portion.

      I'm buying my whole family ice-cream cones.

      Everything would work out if you just had a friend.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    5. Re:Killing the killer feature. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Wait... OK. You just quoted, and then re-enforced each point I made. You missed my own statements future tense and implied ultimatum, told me I'm wrong because of it, AND you told me to read something I've already read.

      Are you a public school teacher?
       

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    6. Re:Killing the killer feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should actually re-read the summary. You write "Listen Netflix" and threaten with canceling, while there is nothing in the article connected to Netflix. Only a catch title, to steer the crowd. This is how news looks today and you got into the trap, this is how and why fake news works and the post truth wins in this world.

    7. Re:Killing the killer feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get angry that supermarkets sell "family sized" items too?

      You are not "subsidizing" larger households when you use netflix any more than you are "subsidizing" larger households when you fill your gastank and only drive one person around in your car instead of many.

      Those damn freeloaders should pay more for gas! I only get one person 30 miles on a tank, they are getting 5 people 28 miles on a tank! I'm subsidizing their travel costs because they are sharing their car!!!!!!!!1111eleven!!!!

      You are a moron.

      For the record, I'm also single. Lots of things are "more expensive" per unit, for single people. Apartments, heat, electricity, internet, food, water hookup and trash pickup fees, etc, etc, etc. If it really bothers you that much, you can do what I did, get roommates. I now pay less for rent, internet, heat, electricity, everything. I also share various media accounts with them, so we each pay for one account, but have access (as a household) to many.

      If you want to be a misanthrope that's fine, but don't pretend to be some sort of economic martyr suffering under the weight of your imaginary subsidies.

    8. Re:Killing the killer feature. by houghi · · Score: 1

      As with many things, legitimate users subsidize freeloaders.

      So freeloaders cause the prices to rise, causing more income for the company.
      So the more freeloaders there are, the better it is for the company, right?

      Now I am proud to be a freeloader. I make all these companies a lot of money and should get my share.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  16. i will never pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take it away from me fine but I'll never pay.

  17. Then I'm done by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    This would be end game for me. I'd be done with Netflix. Being able to have one account for the family is the only way the subscription makes financial sense, especially here in Canada.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Then I'm done by CoreDreamStudios · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I can't pay $10 PER Person in my family (everyone in home, not outside of home)

    2. Re:Then I'm done by kenh · · Score: 1

      Assuming your "family" can get by with five simultaneous streams, simply sign up for the premium plan and go on about your business. If you need more than 5 streams simultaneously, your family likely has greater issues than the subscription fee for Netflix.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Then I'm done by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You're assuming they will allow multiple people to use a premium package.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:Then I'm done by Thakk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so my kids off at school can't use my account? The current price is good, two or three times that? Not so much. When did companies decide that they have a right to my dollars?

    5. Re:Then I'm done by teg · · Score: 1

      You're assuming they will allow multiple people to use a premium package.

      The packages are for multiple people in the same household. What all services like Netflix want to crack down on are people using family plans for non-families, and thus get a lower price than what they should pay.

      Netflix doesn't mind me and my wife looking at different streams at different locations due to travel etc (e.g. I'm abroad, my wife is at home), but would mind if I did "Hmm, I've got a 4 stream subscription but my wife and me are only two. I should share this with my parent and with my sister's family, so they can cancel their subscriptions".

  18. Couple always have to be together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what, now couples and families always have to watch Netflix on their phone from their living room? They can't travel and use the Netflix app anymore? If you pay for 4 streams, you can't use 4 streams?

    1. Re:Couple always have to be together by kenh · · Score: 1

      If a family wants two simultaneous, then sign-up for the standard plan, which offers two streams. If the, y need up to five simultaneous streams, then sign up for the premium plan. You can use your streams anywhere you want.

      --
      Ken
  19. Define "location" by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    It's not out of the question for a single household to have more than one internet connection. Maybe the TV in the main room is hooked up to a fibre landline service but then little Johnny wants to watch on a mobile device in his room and he doesn't always connect to wifi and instead uses his cell service. That would show up as two IPs and unless this company is able to track physical locations of IPs across multiple services then it will red-flag with Netflix and they would unfairly cancel your service. Or someone sublets a part of their home that has it's own DSL service, but the person who sublets is actually a member of the family on their way to becoming independent. Might not be terribly common, but these things will happen. Plus there are the concerns that a company is out there aligning IPs with physical locations. Who gives them permission to do this and can you easily opt-out? Anyone with a bit of tech savvy can redirect through a VPN. What does the tracking service make of multiple logins that all use the same VPN? That would effectively cripple it and so anyone who wants to share their Netflix just has to make sure everyone is using the same VPN service. Even if they are not sharing illegitimately is still a perfectly sensible thing to do for privacy-minded folks.

    1. Re:Define "location" by kenh · · Score: 1

      You are trying too hard - the connection method isn't an issue, it's the number of simultaneous streams. The example you give represents two simultaneous streams, a service Netflix offers in their "standard" subscription. If you attempted to watch two simultaneous streams under the basic subscription, you'd be flagged because you are only entitled to one stream, not two.

      Netflix currently offers one, two, and five stream subscriptions.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Define "location" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Might not be terribly common, but these things will happen.

      And if you're a one-armed driver, and you drive into a lake wearing a seatbelt and you hit an underwater tree with a forked branch that pins your arm to your seatbelt release, it will prevent your escape and you will drown, so we should ban seatbelts.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Define "location" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're a one-armed driver, and you drive into a lake wearing a seatbelt and you hit an underwater tree with a forked branch that pins your arm to your seatbelt release, it will prevent your escape and you will drown, so we should ban seatbelts.

      Why was the lake wearing a seatbelt?

    4. Re:Define "location" by adfraggs · · Score: 1

      It's as complicated as I'm suggesting. It covers all the use cases, not just attempts to stream simultaneously, that's why it's a useful analytics solution. If it was only about the number of concurrent streams then it wouldn't really need AI, something like that could be coded in a day. Read the press release from synamedia, it provides a bit more detail on the kinds of things it looks at, including specifically the case where "they have shared credentials with friends or grown-up children who live away from home". That's where the location detection comes into it. Netflix made the clarification that "the terms of use is sharing within the household and that's our expectation". So a kid is living at home, using the family Netflix account. That's totally OK. The kid goes away to college and still uses the same account. Still mostly OK, it's a premium service after all. The kid gets a job and starts renting their own place and shares same account details with their new room mates. Now not so much OK. The whole time the number of concurrent connections could stay unchanged and Netflix wouldn't want to offer a simple package upgrade in that case so that his new room mates could join in. They would want the kid to get his/her own account. That's just one scenario out of probably 100s that the tool would deal with and I'd say most of them are related to location.

    5. Re:Define "location" by adfraggs · · Score: 1

      It's those damned underwater trees with forked branches

  20. Why do you need AI to check concurrent logins ?? by Joviex · · Score: 1

    Is this world imploding with AI this and AI that?

    You just need to check the accounts logins against : is it possible this assclown was 500 miles apart within 10 minutes? Did the world go full r-tard?

  21. I let one friend use my access and no more by miniskunk · · Score: 0

    I think Netflix is likely more concerned with shutting down those who abuse their subscription by sharing access with several persons. I personally share it only with an ex roommate who was in the same household(which is permissible) for several months before moving to live with his brother in another state. I never took away his access after he moved. He is on disability and has poor eyesight. He couldn't afford a luxury like this and I doubt he is doing heavy watching due to being almost legally blind. I pay for the highest streaming plan cause I love 4k streaming their original programs. Netflix is most likely turning a profit on me despite allowing one other to share especially since I only use it a few times a month.

  22. Consider their premium plan. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Considering that they sell a tier of service SPECIFICALLY designed (and marketed) at sharing an account...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  23. Saves money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this save money?

  24. Netflix already limits screens by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    I pay a higher tier because I share with my mom and we'd run out of screens. But then what's unusual? I travel once or twice a year across country and I watch netflix in my hotel room. That could be seen as unusual, but legitimate. I'm hoping they're looking at some extreme cases like dozens of people watching in a cooperative.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Netflix already limits screens by kenh · · Score: 1

      As long as you only use the number of streams you paid for, there's no problem.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Netflix already limits screens by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Exactly and Netflix actively enforces that. They'll prompt you to kick one of your profiles off if you exceed it.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  25. Netflix Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just started watching netflix. They should pay me to watch that shit.

  26. DUP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? You've forgotten you posted this already?

    https://tech.slashdot.org/story/19/01/03/2141254/video-services-may-use-ai-to-crack-down-on-password-sharing

  27. Any data that goes in to someone by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    else's hands that is not fully encrypted by you before hand. Is monitored, reviewed, accessed and data mined by said company/anyone willing to pay said company for special access.
    The collecting and selling access to all said information is a revenue stream for all of these companies. That is why they are in business and what they do to make money, It is all about making money!
    If you use these devices, these sites or their services you must just accept it.
    If this bothers you, your only option that works is to not use their services/products, period!

    Just my 2 cents ;)

  28. Clickbait article. by atrex · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA is about a UK-based Synamedia firm that has developed this "AI software" to combat password sharing by geolocating account activity.

    "The company said it is already carrying out trials with a number of pay-TV operators but did not reveal which ones."

    It says nothing about an actual partnership with Netflix or any other provider other than that single statement near the end of the article.

    Netflix account tiers already have different levels of simultaneous stream allowances (1, 2, and 4). As long as your levels never go above what you're paying for, there's no reason for them to give a damn if your "family" is in different locations. The writer of this article just shoved Netflix in the title line for clickbait.

  29. Duplicate by phalse+phace · · Score: 2

    Duplicate from a week ago.

    Jan. 3, 2019: Video Services May Use AI To Crack Down on Password Sharing

  30. lol by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    >The company said it is already carrying out trials with a number of pay-TV operators but did not reveal which ones.

    Probably because 15 min later someone would find a way around it.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  31. Travelin' Dad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be interesting. My kids watch from home or school, but I'd be watching from hotels while on business trips. I guess the devices will be consistent though and the number of users/streams.

  32. What is machine learning? by natex84 · · Score: 1

    ... uses machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods...

    Wow, almost everything is machine learning now! Such a buzz word...

  33. Anither day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another 'AI' fairy tale on SlashDot. Remember when technology was actually interesting?

  34. Relevance of netflix by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

    I did the netflix trial.
    I love their interface, and the possibility of using it in the devices in own, including a TV app/applet...
    but, and big BUT:
    the show and movies are....OLD. The only saving gracing is netflix own productions, which obviously are limited.
    Come the TV series are what, 2 years behind?
    When and if Holywood gets their act together, and allows them to sell new content....if hell freezes over, I will sign up the next day.

  35. That is the most glorified use of AI I've seen by nickjj · · Score: 1

    Why do you need AI to determine if someone is logging in from a different location?

    People have built things like that ~10 years ago with good old if statements.

    I built a system that analyzed login patterns to deter account sharing once. It was about 40 lines of Python composed of a tiny bit of logic and a database lookup. It literally took 30 minutes to create.

  36. Why would you share Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netflix sucks. Why would you share it? They've stopped licensing good movies to pay for their misguided trysts with doing their own shows, which thus far have all been just terrible.

    Honestly, who wants to see Kevin Spacey chasing after some skinny 20-something bimbo on screen when they can see him chasing after some skinny 20-something male model in real life?

    1. Re:Why would you share Netflix? by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      Which is a shame. Movies suck, I kind like the interface. The only shortcoming I felt on it was searching country by country.

  37. won't save them a dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People that weren't willing to pay for Netflix's service before AI tracking still won't be willing to pay for Netflix's services after AI tracking. Allowing people to circumvent payment of products and services like this have historically made businesses more profitable. Facebook, Google, YouTube, Spotify, and even FL Studio can track their large levels of success to the fact that customers tried their products and services for free before deciding to buy the product or service or the company found some other way to monetize the customer. Perhaps one could argue that the savings come from a reduced load on the servers?

  38. please turn on camera to authenticate by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

    Seeing AI mentioned, I thought the screen is going to see you to confirm it's you. I'm sure they can ask to turn on camera (yeah handle privacy someway) and ensure it's a live person and the account holder [i guess movie theaters using photo id to confirm reservation is similar]

  39. AI Would Flag Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I watch at home in my spare time is different from what I watch on my lunch when I am at work, for obvious reasons. On my lunch I typically watch episodes of shows that fit into my lunch hour, family rated usually, at home I watch full length movies, most are rated R. I would get flagged for 2 different locations for 2 different types of history. And I'm not even sharing my password with anyone. Would be interested to see how many issues their money grab would cause. They would lose legit subscribers I imagine for hassling them

  40. Who is Al? by Jaegs · · Score: 1

    I don't know anyone named Al, so Netflix can track him all the want, so long as it doesn't affect my streams.

  41. Piracy is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So glad I chose piracy instead. Everything works the way I want it to work.

  42. This is fucking retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Machine learning to analyze account activity and recognize unusual patterns, such as account details being used in two locations within similar time periods"

    You don't need machine learning to do this basic fisher price shit. Who do these people think they are? Kunta Kinte?

  43. Who on earth will subscribe 2 or 4 streams if the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This does not make any sense at all

  44. It physically cannot, if people will want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone will re-translate their stuff via any online services that also can be protected via different password, than they cannot use any facilities, including AI to stop that.

  45. /. shame posted by techdirt.com by Darkness+Of+Course · · Score: 1

    Yep, nothing but a press release here. Bop over to techdirt to read the actual story. Both HBO and Netflix are fine with password sharing. So, why is this urgent solution even necessary?

    It isn't.

    https://www.techdirt.com/artic...