Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Sued By 'Choose Your Own Adventure' Publishers Over Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (polygon.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Polygon: Netflix's first interactive movie, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch makes no bones about its Choose Your Own Adventure inspiration, and that's reportedly caught the eye of the series' original publisher. Chooseco, a publishing company specializing in children's books, is suing Netflix for infringing on the company's "Choose Your Own Adventure" trademark. According to the official complaint, Netflix has been in negotiations with Chooseco over a license for the series since 2016, but Chooseco says Netflix never actually gained permission to use it. After the release of Black Mirror: Bandersnatch late last month, Chooseco has filed a complaint against Netflix for $25 million in damages, as the company says that Netflix's new movie benefits from association with the Choose Your Own Adventure series, without the company ever receiving the trademark. Chooseco says it sent a cease-and-desist request to Netflix at least once over the Choose Your Own Adventure trademark in the past. Netflix has declined to comment on the complaint.

65 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure that CYOA was generic as hell by this point. Everyone calls every story ever made in this format by that trademark.

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought for sure that CYOA was generic as hell by this point. Everyone calls every story ever made in this format by that trademark.

      Agreed. I didn't even know there was a company called Chooseco or that there was a specific brand with that phrase.
      Bringing this suit is actually kinda dangerous for Chooseco. It has the potential to get their trademark completely invalidated. And I believe it should be invalidated.

    2. Re:Interesting by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought for sure that CYOA was generic as hell by this point.

      It is. But Netflix specifically referenced Chooseco as an inspiration, without permission to do so.

      That was stupid and amateurish. They are now going to get an extremely expensive lesson in intellectual property law.

    3. Re:Interesting by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Poor Chooseco, I mean it's not like Netflix paid homage to a genre, and then referenced them explicitly.. the additional interest and sales they'd garner from the exposure must be brutal.

      Those books were popular when I was in grade school 20+ years ago; are they still a relevant/popular category? If not, maybe bandersnatch would wind up introducing people to a genre they otherwise wouldn't have been exposed to.

      They essentially got free advertising from Netflix, and instead of saying 'thank you' decide to sue.

    4. Re:Interesting by bob4u2c · · Score: 2

      Looking at the article (and others), did Netflix actually call it that? From their official site https://www.netflix.com/title/80988062 they refer to it as "A mind-bending tale with multiple endings". Sounds like the old movie Clue, or Army of Darkness (if you had the two ending version).

      Also, wouldn't almost any modern day video game fall under this? Why aren't they suing the entire game industry?

      On another note there already is a movie that promotes itself as a Choose Your Own Adventure movie "The Abominable Snowman", but I suspect the film did horrible so the they didn't want any part of that. When I say part, I mean part of the profit that is.

    5. Re:Interesting by Rhipf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because you say that you are inspired by a trademark shouldn't be enough to get your in trouble. If Netflix actually said that the movie was produced with Chooseco or specifically use the phrase "choose your own adventure" (which they may have done for all I know) then I could see a problem.

      If I make a yo-yo and say that I was inspired by Duncan Toys I should be allowed to do so. If I used the phrase "The Original. World's #1" then I could see having a problem.

      I guess there is no reason Chooseco can't roll the dice and see what the courts say though.

    6. Re:Interesting by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      They essentially got free advertising from Netflix, and instead of saying 'thank you' decide to sue.

      Perhaps. But litigation is more profitable than gratitude.

      Netflix should have known better.

      Imagine if Samsung tablets were advertised as having rounded corners "inspired by Apple."

    7. Re:Interesting by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Netflix won't pay much, if anything, to Chooseco.

      Chooseco has no IP granting them exclusive rights to the concept of a choose your own adventure. They have copyrights over the individual works, but that only applies to those specific works. There is no patent for choose your own adventure books because they've been been around since the mid-70s, well before our patent system was completely subverted. Chooseco is just hoping to get a few bucks with the threat of a lawsuit. If it goes to trial, Chooseco will lose.

      IBM, on the other hand, actually got a patent on choose your own adventure movies in 2003 (well after our patent system was subverted and anything could be patented if you added "on a computer" to it).

      It wouldn't surprise me if Netflix reveals that they licensed IBM's patent prior to making Bandersnatch. If they didn't license that patent, then IBM is the company that Netflix should fear a lawsuit from.

    8. Re:Interesting by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. I remember seeing 'interactive movies' as far back as the SegaCD, and visual novels are a huge thing with about the same premise (I think, never actually played one).

      This lawsuit sounds like baloney to me.

    9. Re: Interesting by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Patents have nothing to do with this.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    10. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sony already did a CYOA movie in the mid-90s. You could go to a movie theater, pay full price for a ticket, and spend 20 minutes voting for scenes with the rest of the audience.

      It didn't take off.

    11. Re:Interesting by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can trademark bags of plain, ordinary sand if you wanted to. Let's say you called it "WackySand". That wouldn't stop anyone else from selling bags of sand, but it sure would stop them from selling bags of sand labelled "WackySand" or even "WackeeSand". Anything that might make people think the "WackySand" company endorses a bag of sand is off-limits.

      The sand itself you're selling can be completely generic. It doesn't have to be special to be trademarked.

      Now if people start calling all bags of sand "WackySand", then yes, you lose your exclusive right to that name. But if you're a sand vendor who *thinks* that "WackySand" has gone generic, but it hasn't been tested in court, guess who gets to be the guinea pig in the first test?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Interesting by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Chooseco has no IP granting them exclusive rights to the concept of a choose your own adventure.

      Yet they do have IP granting them exclusive rights to their own trademark.

    13. Re:Interesting by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      No they didn't and neither does Chooseco claim that they did. If you read the actual lawsuit filing that where linked in TFS then you can see that their complaint is based on that #1 The protagonist in the movie refers to the fictional Bandersnatch book that he bases his game on as a "Choose Your Own Adventure book" and #2 that the movie is dark and disturbing.

      So they claim that Netflix "dilutes the goodwill for and positive associations with Chooseco's mark and tarnishes its products". So they basically are saying that people will now no longer buy CYOA books to their kids since they have seen on Netflix that they are all dark and contain disturbing contents.

    14. Re: Interesting by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      In the lawsuit they claim that $25M is an "conservative" estimate of the real damages that they have suffered :-D

    15. Re:Interesting by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But where is the intellectual property problem here? You can legally, ethically, and morally claim that anybody or anything is your inspiration for creativity as long as you don't copy it or use their trademark. Netflix did not claim this was a "choose your own adventure" product in their marketing, they just said that choose-your-own-adventure was an inspiration.

    16. Re:Interesting by s4080326 · · Score: 1

      Patents, Copyright and trademark are not the same. You can be inspired by a trademark all you want, as long as you don't give the appearance you are in anyway associated with the trademark owner you are completely in the clear. Just look at any generic brand groceries, Dr Radical is clearly inspired by Dr Pepper but there isn't any brand confusion so they are in the clear.

    17. Re:Interesting by s4080326 · · Score: 1

      I would guess Netflix tried to licence "Choose your own adventure" for their idea of a fair price but Chooseco wanted more. Now Chooseco is beginning to see how little their IP is actually worth. I fully expect them to sell of the rights to some low budget producer soon to try and cash in on Netflix's releases.

  2. *Judge reading filing* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm, should I turn to page 93 to side with the plaintiff, or page 134 to side with the defendant....

    1. Re:*Judge reading filing* by Scarletdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oops. You were going to turn to page 134 to side with the defendant, but you accidentally looked at page 135. You have fallen into a pit, impaled yourself on a spike trap, and got your corpse butt raped by the super horny dragon that set the trap.

      Your adventure has ended. Best to go with cremation or closed casket, laddie. It is not a pretty sight.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  3. It never dawned on me by Arzaboa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never thought that choose your own adventure books were actually related to this episode in any way other than an idea. I didn't once associate Chooseco with this Netflix - Black Mirror episode.

    Even if I had associated them, is it an issue to come up with a story that has something to do with the writers childhood? Are we not supposed to write about the action figures we used to play with too?

    --
    Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss

         

    1. Re:It never dawned on me by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Are we not supposed to write about the action figures we used to play with too?

      That depends on who owns the IP I would guess.

    2. Re: It never dawned on me by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      My first Etsy sale for this month was a CYOA book, Prisoner of the Ant People. $10 for something that would have just lingered on the shelf or been donated to one of the various curbside little libraries we have around town.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    3. Re: It never dawned on me by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I was always more partial to the Endless Quest series myself. Mountain of Mirrors is one of my favorites.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    4. Re:It never dawned on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss

      Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Ludwig Jacobowski, 1899

      https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/07/25/smile/

      Now who is infringing?

  4. Visual Novels by chocobo.sage · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And they haven't gone after every Visual Novel ever written?

    1. Re:Visual Novels by tepples · · Score: 1

      How many visual novels mention the "Choose Your Own Adventure" brand in their marketing materials or dialogue? I doubt many.

  5. Did silent steel get sued back in day? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Did silent steel get sued back in day?

    1. Re:Did silent steel get sued back in day? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Did silent steel get sued back in day?

      Unlikely because it never billed itself as "Choose your own Adventure".

      And there are so many different ways around the trademark, you don't actually have to use the phrase "Choose your own adventure" at all. "Interactive Movie" or "Choose what happens" or "Make your choice" are things you could use.

      Chooseco didn't go after the concept of a branching storyline, just a trademark.

      It should be noted that they're probably branching out - they did release a nice board game a few months back. But again, it's not the concept, but the trademark.

  6. Re: If it's a Netflix original... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    You could've watched Castlevania. It's not Netflix's fault you make bad decisions.

  7. Re:If it's a Netflix original... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    But the only choices are to play as

    1. USA
    2. USSR

  8. Re: If it's a Netflix original... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Nuts. You're probably right.

  9. Re:If it's a Netflix original... by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Informative

    It really isn't. It was originally a British show (it ran on Channel 4) that Netflix picked up after the first two series. I haven't gotten around to watching the more recent episodes yet, but the originals were pretty good. If I had to describe it succinctly, "Modern Twilight Zone" seems to do a good job.

    Of course it's modern TV so they can get away with a bit more. The first episode featured a plot where some British royal family member has apparently been kidnapped and the kidnappers are threatening to kill the person unless the Prime Minister fucks a pig on live television. That might sound crude (and it is) but it's just as engrossing as it is gross. I'd suggest giving it a try.

  10. Re:Netflix is going to lose. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    It seems like Netflix could have sidestepped the whole issue easily by using a different phrasing like "Devise your own journey" or something along those lines. I think there's a lot of legal precedence against them. Apparently if you want to use the phrase "Let's get ready to rumble!" you have to pay the announcer that came up with it.

  11. Fair Use? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    IINAL, but it would seem to me if Netflix is using the CYOA statement as a descriptive term, and not implying their show is a CYOPA product they may be able to claim fair use. You can use trademarks in such as a way if they are descriptive and do not imply endorsement or cause confusion. If I read the complaint correctly the issue is a line in the show. t's pretty clear that Netflix makes movies, not children's adventure books, so an actor saying "This is like the CYOA book XXX" as par tof a scene isn't likely to cause confusion.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Fair Use? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not a very accurate description though. The character they are controlling is not their avatar, it's more like "choose the protagonist's adventure".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. I get they want to defend their IP, but ... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    This is yet another instance where I think they try to extend things too far. The "Choose Your Own Adventure" book series was aimed at kids, for starters. I used to be a big fan of those books as a kid, and tried to check them out at my local library whenever they had another one I hadn't read yet. But they certainly weren't "adult content" material. It seems odd to try to associate what they were doing with a Black Mirror episode that's clearly a lot more mature in nature. And all of that's before even asking if the idea of having multiple endings to follow in a book means you own the concept of doing an interactive TV show or movie with multiple outcomes?

    The biggest problem, as someone else commented, by simply be Netflix using the "Choose your own adventure" wording to describe it.

  13. Extremely weak case. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Trademarks are for branding in written content, not spoken. The phrase, "choose your own adventure" is not trademarked because that is impossible. Even with subtitles they would have to be trying to confuse the customers with something that is similar to it's trademark, the words alone are not enough.

    Coca-Cola would have a better chance of suing Pepsi for saying "it's like Coke but tastes better" in one of their commercials.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Extremely weak case. by msauve · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Not only can pronounced phrases be trademarked, so can pure sounds (e.g. NBC, THX, many more).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Extremely weak case. by dissy · · Score: 1

      That was along the lines of my thought process when I saw the headline..

      "Why would Netflix copy the official choose your own adventure logo/title?!?"
      "Wait, did choose your own adventure even *have* a logo?"

      A quick check on ye olde bookshelf and sure enough, no logo, and their title is simply white text in an orange/red oval border.

      So I went to look it up, it being the actual registered trademark.
      http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=4889435

      That phrase, in that font, in that typeset, in an oval, in all caps, and either one full line or split over two lines as "choose your / own adventure"
      That's the trademark.

      Details:
      Mark Drawing Type: 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S)
      Description of Mark: The mark consists of the words "CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE" in a stylized format all contained within an oval.
      Color(s) Claimed: Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
      Design Search Code(s): 26.03.21 - Ovals that are completely or partially shaded

      So I haven't watched this episode of black mirror. Does that exact mark get displayed within the show anywhere? I'd be shocked if netflix would be that dumb.

      But as you said, just using the phrase to refer to the actual book series, is perfectly legal and required by law.
      You are required to use a mark when referring to a product the mark applies to, forbidden from referring to the product as anything else but the mark, and forbidden from using the mark to refer to any other product.

    3. Re:Extremely weak case. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those are covered by copyright... but only that instance.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Extremely weak case. by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Trademarks are for branding in written content, not spoken.

      This is false. A trademark can be anything that is source-identifying for goods or services. It can be a color (see "UPS brown"), a scent (see the "flowery musk scent" of Verizon stores (ew)), or, yes, a sound (see the "Intel inside" chimes). Here's a whole page the USPTO dedicated to sound marks.

      The phrase, "choose your own adventure" is not trademarked because that is impossible.

      This is also false. It's not just possible to trademark phrases, Chooseco has held a registered US trademark for the CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE word mark in books since 2004.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    5. Re:Extremely weak case. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Do note that those are all specific and well defined instances, not generic.

      Also, the "CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE" word mark is limited to it being written in uppercase in a certain typeset while the episode never even had it in writing.

      The courts shall validate this truth.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re:Extremely weak case. by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Do note that those are all specific and well defined instances, not generic.

      Every trademark is a specific and well defined instance of a particular means of source identification (name, logo, color, sound, trade dress, etc.) coming to be associated, via actual, continuous use in commerce, with the goods or services of the mark holder. None of them are generic, because then they couldn't be trademarks.

      Also, the "CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE" word mark is limited to it being written in uppercase in a certain typeset

      This is false. The above referenced mark has mark drawing code 1 for "typed drawing", which is an archaic (pre-2004) but legally identical form of standard character mark. Standard character marks are often displayed by the USPTO in all caps, but "the owner of the mark is not limited to any particular depiction of the mark", including case, font style, size, color, graphical adornments, etc.

      Look, it sounds like you're not big on Chooseco's arguments, and I'm not either. But it does neither you nor anyone else any good to spout demonstrably untrue stuff.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  14. Wondering by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I was wondering when this was going to happen. IMHO, Bandersnatch really sucked much like the Choose Your Own Adventure book series. I remember reading them when I was a kid and wondering what the hell was so great about them.

    1. Re:Wondering by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Wasn't bandersnatch a term coined and made popular by Lewis Carrol? Seems like we have a minor bit of irony going on here.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  15. What about video games? by Your_spleen · · Score: 1

    Can a company patent a person's right to choose their own adventure in the consumption of entertainment? At what point does a "choose your own adventure" become a role playing game? Why don't they own the rights to those?

  16. Depends by JBMcB · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Depends on how it was framed. If they used it in marketing materials they *may* be in trouble. If a director, or producer, or Netflix exec said it in an interview, they are probably safe.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Depends by F.Ultra · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read the actual lawsuit filing that is linked from TFS one can see that Chooseco isn't claiming that Netflix said that they where inspired, they claim that people will believe that the Bandersnatch book from the movie is an actual CYOA book from Chooseco and that will scare people away from their brand since the book in the movie is dark and disturbing.

      Extra hilarious are these two claims:

      35. Netflix has benefitted from its association with Chooseco's iconic brand. Bandersnatch has been discussed widely in the press and many reviews of the movie include the phrase or even reference the book series.
      36. The association between Bandersnatch and Choose Your Own Adventure has been widely discussed on social media. That discussion demonstrates the dilution of the brand.

      So basically, Netflix didn't say that their movie is a CYOA movie but reviewers and people on social media does and therefore we want money from Netflix...

    2. Re:Depends by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      So basically, Netflix didn't say that their movie is a CYOA movie but reviewers and people on social media does and therefore we want money from Netflix...

      Wow, that's just dumb. Summary judgement with expenses time.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  17. IP law is complicated by swell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone can claim a trademark. After using it a while, they can apply for registration. They will learn that some things qualify and some don't and some are indeterminate. A name like Xerox was easy to qualify because it was an invented word and nobody else had claimed it.

    Even if you can register a TM, it may be challenged in court on various grounds. Suppose you claimed Lunch Time as a TM. It is far more likely than Xerox to have been used already and it is a risky choice. Someone might argue that Lunch Time is a common phrase undeserving of a trademark.

    Failure to continuously use your TM can forfeit your rights. Failure to defend it in the face of others' using the same mark can forfeit your rights. IP law is complicated and not always rational and may have changed since I glanced at it in 1975.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  18. This could backfire on them too by Solandri · · Score: 1

    If the series (I haven't watched it) used the phrase "choose your own adventure" to quickly get across the concept of a story where the audience determines the progression of the plot, that actually sounds like a pretty good argument that the trademarked term has become genericized, and grounds for rescinding the trademark.

  19. Judge with a sense of humor needed by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the judge will have some fun with this.

    If the plaintiff wishes to proceed with the facepalm of the year lawsuit, turn to page 47.

    If the anything-to-make-a-quick-buck plaintiff wishes to wisely drop this complete waste of my time, turn to page 93.

  20. Fighting Fantasy by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    That was stupid and amateurish.

    Really? Isn't there such a thing as fair use. IIRC all they said was something to the effect of "it's a game like the choose your own adventure books" which I had actually never heard of before (it was Fighting Fantasy when I was a kid) so I actually thought they had just made up the name for the show to avoid upsetting Fighting Fantasy which is ironic given that, thanks to Chooseco, Netflix is now fighting fantasy.

    1. Re:Fighting Fantasy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Isn't there such a thing as fair use.

      No, not for trademarks. You are thinking of copyright, which has nothing to do with this dispute.

    2. Re:Fighting Fantasy by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      That is not what they are suing for, don't know why TFS makes that claim. If one reads the lawsuit filing (it's linked in TFS) one can see that they claim that people will think that the Bandersnatch book from the movie is an actual CYOA book from Chooseco and since that book is dark and disturbing people will be scared away from CYOA books and thus Chooseco will suffer harm...

    3. Re:Fighting Fantasy by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Isn't there such a thing as fair use.

      No, not for trademarks. You are thinking of copyright, which has nothing to do with this dispute.

      This is false. Descriptive and nominative fair use are well-established defenses to trademark infringement. A defendant may also assert parody and other 1st Amendment-based defenses. See, for example, Mattel's failed suit against the band who sang "Barbie Girl".

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    4. Re:Fighting Fantasy by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      CYOA isn't dark and disturbing? What I remember of the books from when I was a kid:
      - dying in a blizzard
      - dying by falling off a cliff
      - dying from choking on a bone
      - dying from a shaman's curse
      - being shrunk by aliens
      - dying by being eating by ants
      - dying by aliens

      The one "win condition" I remember involved finding some angry magical sword that cut my palm and killed a bunch of people, but let me survive.

    5. Re:Fighting Fantasy by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

  21. Re: If it's a Netflix original... by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Castlevania's first "season" was pretty interesting. The second was poop.

  22. Re:If it's a Netflix original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are out of your freaking mind if you think they don't have quality content.

    Go back to your free range organic television shows. Fucking hipster trash can't stand when things get big and popular. They think every single thing in the world needs to be some kind of small batch bullshit that only they know about or it isn't worth shit.

  23. Re:If it's a Netflix original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I tried Black Mirror, and the first episode turned me off. The only thing interesting about it was the sheer outrageousness of the ransom request, which I just assumed would be brushed off as nonsense. But nope, an entire episode about a guy dealing with the threat and then reality that he'd have to fuck a pig. Nothing in the episode made up for how dumb that premise was.

  24. Re:If it's a Netflix original... by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    Then you missed the whole plot for it was nonsense, the kidnapper released the "Princess" long before the guy fucked the pig.

  25. Re:The algorithm is not the same by russotto · · Score: 2

    Yes, some of the CYOA books -- including #1, The Cave of Time -- you could get trapped in a loop. And "Inside UFO 54-40" had an unreachable ending.

  26. Re: If it's a Netflix original... by Paxtez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first episode is probably the worst one. Normally people I know who recommend the show, just say skip the first episode. I would really recommend giving it another shot. A million merits or white Christmas are good.