Slashdot Mirror


Federal Shutdown May Send Millennial Workers To Exits (techtarget.com)

dcblogs writes: The federal government measures the "engagement" of its federal workforce once a year with a massive survey of 1.5 million employees. And what it has found is that most federal workers are very dedicated to their work. Its most recent survey -- the 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey -- asked employees if they are "willing to put in extra effort to get their job done," 96% of the survey takers responded affirmatively. Moreover, 91% agreed with the statement that they "look for ways to do their jobs better," and 90% "believe their work is important." But this job dedication is being tested by the U.S. government shutdown, and most at risk of leaving are Millennial-age workers. Less than 6% of federal employees are under the age of 30 and represent half of all people who leave an agency within the first two years. The best employees have options, and "a major concern is that the brightest, hardest-working, and most capable, dedicated government employees may opt out of government service and take jobs in the private sector," Talya Bauer, professor of management at Portland State University in Oregon and president of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, said. The shutdown could hurt the reputation of the government as a good place to work, she said.

35 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Taking polls way too seriously here by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How credulous do you have to be to think a survey like this means anything? Might as well ask, "Who here doesn't want to get fired?" Damn.

    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:Taking polls way too seriously here by gtall · · Score: 2

      These surveys are not like private industry surveys. They are not used to root out malcontents and the people responding are well protected.

    2. Re:Taking polls way too seriously here by kiminator · · Score: 2

      It's definitely not about getting fired (the funding levels aren't likely to change, so the jobs will still be there when the shutdown ends). My bet is it's because younger employees are far less likely to have savings. Without savings, they're basically forced to find other jobs just to make ends meet. I suspect that this is the strongest driving factor rather than any cultural issues.

  2. Re:Well.. So? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't Trump say he wanted a smaller government? Seems like a quick way to achieve that.

    Yes, this. I bet most of the Republican party are on cloud 9 right now, dreaming about their libertarian, small gubbermint ideologies. Meanwhile, millions of not so ideological people suffer from a lack of government services. In practice, Libertarians are just a bunch of sadistic perverts.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  3. In the long run i'm not too worried by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think workers are concerned about politics resulting in a government shutdown, consider this:
    If you work in private industry, you can be a victim of a mass-layoff, and you never know its coming, so you should have emergency $$$ savings to prepare for that possibility, just as you should if you work for government - in case of political issues causing funding shortfall come the end of the fiscal year.

    With this US government shutdown... employees had more than 60 days' warning that this was extremely likely to happen, essentially; the coming political clash was evident from miles away immediately after the election --- this eventuality became almost certain. Unlike a mass layoff; its presumably going to be temporary, and many furloughed employees will be entitled to automatic back pay - full wages for the time they didn't work, when the deficiency is resolved.

    So, not only do they have ample warning to plan and make sure to reign in unnecessary spending: nearly 60 days warning is plenty of time for the best employees to have arranged some kind of alternate work or gig for earning money while on furlough, And after the shutdown's over, they come back on, and get paid double ---- making the whole thing essentially a 20+ day paid vacation where they could amplify their pay
      or avail themselves of other opportunities.

    1. Re:In the long run i'm not too worried by penandpaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everyone is sympathetic to government shutdowns. I see banks, phone companies, and utilities all offering some kind of "assistance" to those affected. I don't think I have seen similar helping hands toward lay offs.

    2. Re:In the long run i'm not too worried by penandpaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Saving money on a budget really isn't anymore harder than getting completely broad-sided by an unexpected payment or income disruption and having to deal with the reality of that situation.

      Going to bed hungry sucks. Eating the same crappy rice and beans for a month sucks too. Having holey shoes is no fun when it rains or snows. Inhibiting impulses to buy something with the savings collected is hard too.

      But those are easier than dealing with pay-day loans and financial uncertainty when laid off or furloughed.

      I have been there and I have done all those things and it's easier than dealing with daily calls from debt collectors.

    3. Re:In the long run i'm not too worried by guruevi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was about to say the same thing. Job dedication at any company would be 90%+ too if they paid 135% of industry wages nearly guaranteed for the rest of your life with limitless mobility within the company and some of the best benefits.

      The government seems to "work" fine, everything essential is self-funding or exempt from shutdowns including many national and state parks. The bean counters and middle managers and a few millennial hipsters - things would function a lot better without all of them there.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:In the long run i'm not too worried by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      $76,470 for average federal government wages vs $44,600 for average private sector wages

      Those are misleading figures, because you're aggregating over industry sectors and the representation in those sectors is not uniform. Many of what would be low-paid government employees are now subcontracted out. If you go sector-by-sector, the government pays OK, but not stellar.

      IOW, It's not like a programmer in the governemnt is earning 35% more than a programmer in industry.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:In the long run i'm not too worried by Fencepost · · Score: 2
      $76,470 for average federal government wages vs $44,600 for average private sector wages

      What? That's an insane comparison. That's like complaining about how overpaid programmers are because average salaries at high-tech firms are higher than average salaries at janitorial companies. Why, I'm really upset that my neighbor the VP of finance at a large company makes huuuuge bucks while I'm getting $12/hour for my cashier job at the local grocery store while living in my parents' basement! We both work with money, so we should both be paid the same, right?

      Among other issues, a significant percentage of lower-paying jobs being done for the government or at government facilities don't get counted because they're contracted out, often to the lowest bidder (which often charges more than it cost when things were being done in-house, but since part of that money can then be spent to invest in 'friendly' politicians....).

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
  4. Wait - I thought you said "Millennials" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> the brightest, hardest-working, and most capable, dedicated government employees may opt out of government service

    Wait - I thought you said "Millennials"

  5. Re:Well.. So? by gtall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Republicans win by getting a smaller gubbermint. They win again by dragging the gubbermint through the mud thus tainting it for the future as a place to do good work. And they'll win again after they've fucked up the gubbermint operations by campaigning under the slogan that the gubbermint doesn't work well, so elect them to fix it.

  6. Sounds good to me, too! by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I live near DC and never hear the end of all the moaning and whining when government does a shut-down. I mean, it really does reach the absurd at times. I remember last time there was a shutdown, I was at a full service car wash in Gaithersburg, MD. This lady in front of me rolls in with a high-end luxury full size SUV, and asks to have it fully detailed and waxed. While we're standing in line, she proceeds to tell me how the government shutdown has made everything so stressful for her.... and she just decided to get the car all cleaned up since she had all this time to kill now.

    It only took about 2 days of this shut-down before people were on all the news stations, talking about their struggle. (None of them were even close to missing 1 paycheck yet!)

    I really do get that the younger people, who just got a first "real job" doing something for Federal govt., would be far more impacted ... But hey, I *never* accepted a government job for this reason. Always felt like the private sector made more sense. I don't like knowing my paycheck is covered by tax revenue they forcibly take from everybody else who works, and everything is subject to voters voting people in or out of office, legislation changing what government plans to do next, etc. Federal govt. jobs have different sets of perks, too, though. It's very difficult to get fired from most government jobs, for example. Even the idiots trying to watch porn while on the job often just got a slap on the wrist and kept their employment.... If you're a real screw up, you sometimes even get a promotion, because it's the only easy way for your superior to get rid of having to deal with you.

  7. Re:Pension, job security, 30 days leave, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a family member who is a federal agent. He has to work even when he is "furloughed." He just doesn't get paid until the next spending bill is passed. It's not like a paid vacation for all federal employees.

  8. Re:Well.. So? by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 2

    DRAIN THE SWAMP

    ... of what talent is there.

  9. Re:The plan is working by penandpaper · · Score: 2

    Small good government != small ineffectual government.

  10. Re:TSA will quit. by nwaack · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's going to happen when the TSA, which has to work without pay, quits?

    Travelling by air will become a somewhat smooth process again.

  11. What are millenials doing working for the governme by melted · · Score: 2

    What are millenials doing working for the government anyway. Private sector is on fire. Go make some money while it's easier to make.

  12. Brightest will go private sector for money? by poity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why didn't they do that in the first place?

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  13. Re:Pension, job security, 30 days leave, yeah by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The longer the government shutdown lasts, the more this sounds like slavery. I mean not quite, because ostensibly air traffic controllers could quit and become baristas at Starbucks or whatever (assuming the government does not compel them to not do so), but pretty close.

    Particularly appalling is the fact that during the shutdown, all vacations are cancelled, and anyone on vacation is required to immediately terminate that vacation and return to work (because after all, otherwise everyone essential would take vacations), creating pretty significant hardship, particularly given that it happened during the Christmas holiday. I'm pretty sure if I worked for the federal government, I'd have said, "Screw you. I quit," and I'm not even a millennial. I can't imagine how they didn't have an absolute exodus.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  14. This affects intel agents and data security by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A large quantity of patriotic native born Americans, who are millenials, are impacted by this. I personally know of quite a few that had been considering work in data security and in intelligence or law enforcement services for the US who are affected.

    How can you trust people when they throw you under the bus because they don't want to look foolish?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Re:Well.. So? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    This is a tell for a Russian agent. Dividing us and making us fight with one another with ugly hate language. Nice try, Ivan but we Americans are stronger than you.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  16. Historical survey results by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Normally you want to compare stats like these against the general population as a basis for comparison, to figure out if an organization (the government in this case) deviates substantially from the average for the population. Failing that, you can compare a subset of the population (government workers) against itself in past years. That won't tell you where that subset stands relative to the general population, but it will tell you changes (first derivative).

    The 2018 report has historical results for the same survey questions from 2014-2018, and 2013 report show results from 2010-2013 (it appears the questions in the summary were introduced in 2010).

    "willing to put in extra effort" has remained consistent at 96%. "look for ways to do job better" consistently between 90%-91%. "work is important" consistently between 90%-91%. Basically, government employees' attitudes about these factors has not changed in 8 years (which takes us through one change in President's party, control of the House, and control of the Senate). And there is no evidence to indicate they are changing.

    The survey questions whose results did change are:
    • "I am given a real opportunity to improve my skills in my organization." Dipped from 66% in 2010 to 59% in 2014, back up to 66% by 2018.
    • "I feel encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing things." Same trend as above. 60% to 55% to 61% in 2010, 2014, and 2018
    • "My training needs are assessed." 54% in 2010, dropping to 50% in 2014, rising to 55% by 2018.
    • "I can disclose a suspected violation of any law, rule or regulation without fear of reprisal." 61% from 2010-2014, but rising to 66% by 2018
    • " In my most recent performance appraisal, I understood what I had to do to be rated at different performance levels (for example, Fully Successful, Outstanding)." 67% from 2010-2014, but rising to 71% by 2018.

    These are the survey questions which indicate changes in government employee attitude (apparently there was more doom and gloom around 2014). That TFA focuses instead on three survey questions whose results have not changed, and discussed them with respect to a current event which could not yet have influenced the survey results, suggests the authors of TFA were just looking for an excuse to write an opinion piece, not report the news.

  17. Re:Well.. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Classic GOP. Reasonable terms = "my way or the highway"

    Trump didn't get his wall in 2017. He didn't get his wall in 2018. And he won't be getting his wall in 2019. This temper tantrum is the result of the "master" negotiator.

  18. Really nothing new here by owlaf · · Score: 2

    Having been a fed employee, the problem of younger people leaving has been a problem known for a while. I remember taking a survey around 2006 (may have been the one mentioned in the article) and accompany info for the survey included the high leave rate of young employees. One can deal with less job satisfaction for more job security if they have things such as marriages, kids, mortgages the younger don't have. This shutdown will just encourage a little more of the known issue

  19. Re:Pension, job security, 30 days leave, yeah by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think that may be the best reason I've ever heard for "losing" your official cell phone.

    You: Whoops. Sorry, I didn't get your voice mail. My phone went crazy in Paris.
    Boss: Crazy?
    You: In Seine.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  20. Um.. Gov't jobs are traditionally much more stable by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's only because the GOP has been actively sabotaging the government that this is a problem. This entire shutdown mess is entirely a creation of the GOP.

    And I see what you did there with your anecdote where you tell a story with the most obnoxious person anyone can imagine (Big SUV, detailing, of course a Lady because there's a meme for that). Let that rub off on anyone who complains about the shutdown.

    I mean, if we're gonna talk about obnoxious folks in the shutdown there's this gem. But there's also a lot of folks trying to figure out how to afford gas. Real Wages are down yet like the article says the GOP base is thrilled. Meanwhile it's not free to go to work. That "hurting the people he's supposed to hurt" lady (meme intended) has a 7 hour commute. Some folks need money for daycare too. Screw this noise.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Re:Coast Guard by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    Plenty of millennials in the Coast Guard, who aren't getting paid.

    These are truly people who are doing it for the job and not the money.

    Why is the USCG not under DOD who are still being paid? It now looks stupid that they aren't. Every person who is pointing at the Coast Guard and using them as a talking point against the shutdown is calling them a necessary coastal defense. Why not Department of Defense, then?

  22. Re:Well.. So? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it. -- P.J. O'Rourke

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  23. Re:Well.. So? by kiminator · · Score: 4, Informative

    What I find interesting is that it seems the worst impacts of the shutdown are being felt by demographics that tend to vote Republican. That makes the political fallout for this shutdown potentially disastrous for Republicans.

    Maybe they'll forget come 2020. But we'll see. The Republican party's behavior has been pretty uniformly reprehensible, and there's a chance that these events will cause a few Republican voters to open their eyes and see the party for what it is: a party for the rich, by the rich, who only panders to non-rich voters by promising to harm "those people". When they find that they're often in the crosshairs, maybe they'll start expanding their news sources beyond the conservative bubble and actually learn something.

    Not many, of course. It's rare for people to change their minds like this. But it does happen. And it could be the beginning of the end for the Republican party (aside: if the Republican party ends, it will be replaced by another party: our system is only stable with two parties in power; hopefully that other party will be less terrible so that we can actually have a reasonable national political discussion for once).

  24. Re: Well.. So? by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What, putting five billion unbudgeted dollars into an appropriation bill is reasonable? For a project with no corresponding authorization bill?

    But you probably don't understand what any of that means, so how about this: Congress asked the president for a detailed breakdown of how he intended to spend the money and he only itemized 1.7 billion, meaning he's demanding 3.2 billion that he could spend any way he likes.

    If you think government spending is out of control, wait until this becomes the new normal.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  25. Re:Deal with it snowflake GOP faggots, Trump owns by DethLok · · Score: 2

    Ha ha, well said AC, well said.

    Trump IS on record (video is available) as saying he'll accept the blame for the shutdown.

    And he IS on record for dodging the Vietnam draft due to, apparently, "bone spurs" (whatever they are).

    Dunno about the electric chair, but I strong suspect that Trump doesn't have the best interests of the USA in mind as president, rather the best interests of the Trump family business.

    As has been mentioned, with examples, on many other sites including YouTube.

  26. Re:Well.. So? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I find interesting is that it seems the worst impacts of the shutdown are being felt by demographics that tend to vote Republican. That makes the political fallout for this shutdown potentially disastrous for Republicans.

    Maybe they'll forget come 2020. But we'll see. The Republican party's behavior has been pretty uniformly reprehensible, and there's a chance that these events will cause a few Republican voters to open their eyes and see the party for what it is: a party for the rich, by the rich, who only panders to non-rich voters by promising to harm "those people". When they find that they're often in the crosshairs, maybe they'll start expanding their news sources beyond the conservative bubble and actually learn something.

    Not many, of course. It's rare for people to change their minds like this. But it does happen. And it could be the beginning of the end for the Republican party (aside: if the Republican party ends, it will be replaced by another party: our system is only stable with two parties in power; hopefully that other party will be less terrible so that we can actually have a reasonable national political discussion for once).

    I chance that it will not be disastrous. We are talking about a core that's been willing to commit socioeconomic seppuku for years as long as someone blows wind through the right whistle.

    This problem is sociological and cultural in nature, and it is not one without precedent. Cultures have been known to walk off the proverbial cliff, engaging in self-destructive and self-defeating customs and practices in the name of identity.

    It's high time we need to recognize their voting patterns as another manifestation of said types of cultures. Shades of J.D. Vance's "Hillbilly Effigy."

    Even if perchance this causes a Republican blow-back in 2020, for as long as these social dynamics persists with these voters, they will continue with these patterns, with these exaggerated outlooks on what America is supposed to be, and animosity towards anything and anyone that doesn't fit the mold.

    Cruelty is the point. It's not a side-effect, not a tool. It is the point.

    Case in point , read this story of a voter saying "Trump is not hurting the people he's supposed to be hurting". It is quite revealing of the type of shi-that-never-dies we are dealing with. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/8/18173678/trump-shutdown-voter-florida

  27. Re: Well.. So? by hey! · · Score: 2

    Well, I may be a moron, but I'm a moron who understands the difference between a budget, and authorization and an appropriation bill. The system is designed, among other things, to restrain presidential power and to force the government to work out its spending priorities in advance. I don't know if *you* are a moron too, but you're certainly an ignoramus.

    What Trump wants is off-budget spending to be put into a routine appropriations bill, without a formally authorized program that will prevent that spending for being diverted to other uses. What are his alternatives? Well he's wanted the wall for years, so he could put the five billion in his FY2020 request, which means shovels could be in the ground on October 1 of 2019.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. Re:Well.. So? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 2

    who only panders to non-rich voters by promising to harm "those people".

    Every year that goes by, that becomes less and less of a winning strategy. The republican party has not been friendly to either women or minorities, and I can't imagine that they're all going to suddenly forget the party's history at some point in the coming decades and vote republican.

    Awww, that's so cute! You believe that people vote based on well-informed reason. They won't remember a thing when the next election cycle is in full swing. They'll be bombarded from all sides with appeals to emotion & vilifying anyone they identify as "other." All of this will be enthusiastically reinforced by the main stream media and especially social media. After all, that's what social media is designed to do; keep people's eyes on their web pages by promoting indignant outrage inducing comments, headlines, & memes.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.