Slashdot Mirror


Pedestrians, E-Scooters Are Clashing In the Struggle For Sidewalk Space (latimes.com)

Slashdot reader mileshigh writes: Activists in California have filed a federal lawsuit alleging that parked scooters littering sidewalks interfere with sidewalk accessibility for people with multiple types of disabilities and violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Many people have been wondering when this would happen since California courts are notoriously friendly to ADA complaints and lawsuits. Realistically, this type of lawsuit may well be the Achilles' heel of scooter-sharing services, especially if they're granted class-action status as this lawsuit is requesting. Will likely be the first of many. "Without full use of the sidewalk and curb ramps at street intersections, persons with mobility and/or visual impairments have significant barriers in crossing from a pedestrian walkway to a street," the suit alleges. "This is exacerbated when the sidewalk itself is full of obstructions and no longer able to be fully and freely used by people with disabilities."

The suit accuses the city of not maintaining streets and sidewalks in a way that doesn't discriminate against the disabled and allowing "dockless scooters used primarily for recreational purposes to proliferate unchecked throughout San Diego and to block safe and equal access for people with disabilities." The lawsuit also alleges the scooter companies have been allowed to "appropriate the public commons for their own profit."

30 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Motorized by fluffernutter · · Score: 4

    Why would anyone think it was ok to ride a motorized vehicle on the sidewalk?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Motorized by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the average person is pretty dumb, that's why.
      These e-scooters are dangerous to begin with. I forsee them being banned universally before too long.

    2. Re:Motorized by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why would anyone think it was ok to ride a motorized vehicle on the sidewalk?

      Carrying on the time honored Slashdot tradition of not even reading the summary I see...

      They're not. They're parking on the sidewalks. And the city government is too lazy and incompetent to do their fucking jobs and enforce their own laws, as with most California cities. Until now, when somebody finally found a bigger victim. In California's victim politics, the biggest victim wins.

    3. Re:Motorized by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't see that the page you linked to says you can ride bicycles on sidewalks. It outlines several different types of bike paths, none of which are sidewalks (one is separated from a main road by, for example, a sidewalk). It does say that bicycles of all types must obey the rules of the road (no driving on the sidewalk?).

    4. Re:Motorized by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would anyone think it was ok to ride a motorized vehicle on the sidewalk?

      Carrying on the time honored Slashdot tradition of not even reading the summary I see...

      They're not. They're parking on the sidewalks. And the city government is too lazy and incompetent to do their fucking jobs and enforce their own laws, as with most California cities. Until now, when somebody finally found a bigger victim. In California's victim politics, the biggest victim wins.

      Ahem - at least one person in the FA was riding his scooter on the sidewalk.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Motorized by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Are they driving on the sidewalk?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Motorized by dfghjk · · Score: 2

      You are right, he didn't. Riding bicycles on sidewalks is legal in CA, however, absent local regulations like in most of the country. I am not a CA resident, but I saw this: https://www.sallymorinlaw.com/...

      " California Vehicle Code Sections 21650(g) and 21206 state that there is no prohibition against riding on a sidewalk in the absence of a local municipal ban."

      Also note that there are other states beyond CA, most of which allow bicycles on sidewalks, and that in most areas e-bikes are legally viewed as bicycles for these purposes.

    7. Re:Motorized by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note: I've been riding motocycles for over 35 years
      Unlike these pesky e-scooters, which require no training or licensing of any kind, no safety equipment, no minimum age, no insurance, and so on, motorcycles require knowledge and training, testing, licensing, insurance, and operate on PUBLIC ROADS. Apples and hand grenades. Try again troll.

    8. Re:Motorized by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I didn't make it up to San Francisco on my last trip to the Bay Area, but everywhere between San Jose and Mountain View that I visited had people riding them on sidewalks and on the road ignoring traffic signals. Parking them seemed to be the smallest problem: people are riding them dangerously without any kind of insurance, who suffers when they hit a car or a pedestrian?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Motorized by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 4, Informative

      The FA may not talk about it, but most people are riding them on the sidewalk in San Diego. I would say about 3/4, but it probably varies by neighborhood. Some scooter riders use bike lanes and follow normal bike safety protocols around traffic, but less than 1 in 10 wears a helmet.

    10. Re:Motorized by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Why are they parking on Californias sidewalks when they're covered in poop?

      Because if they're covered in poop, it is probably time to park and go take a shower.

      Even Californians know that, and the place is a total shit-show.

    11. Re:Motorized by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      For example in Oregon you can ride a bike on the sidewalk, but you're supposed to ride at walking speed and you absolutely have to yield to pedestrians; on a residential street, that is no problem. But downtown, even in a small city, there is basically no way to ride legally on the sidewalk, because you'd have to dismount and walk the bike to successfully yield to all the pedestrians.

    12. Re: Motorized by astrofurter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy solution: ban cars.

    13. Re: Motorized by astrofurter · · Score: 2

      Makes you wonder why the city administration is putting so many resources into discouraging alternatives to automobile use. Maybe they are getting some bribes from auto industry lobbyists? Or maybe they just love air pollution?

    14. Re:Motorized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a matter of fact, they were always for pedestrians. Carriages were welcome to push through the throng, but the idea of roads being the domain of wheeled vehicles only is very new.

      Try https://99percentinvisible.org... for an approachable dive into why this is the case.

    15. Re: Motorized by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Roads obviously predate the existence of the wheel, genius.

    16. Re: Motorized by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Not the roads in question.

  2. It's a problem with a pretty clear solution by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    send meter maids around to collect the scooters that are illegally parked and auction them off. This is what most municipalities are doing and it pretty much would wreck their business model, which they seem to be aware of .

    I don't necessarily think this is a bad idea. It could potentially make commuting by bus viable in major cities that were laid out with cars in mind and do so long before self driving cars are a thing. But more thought needs to be given to it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's a problem with a pretty clear solution by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't auction them off. Just charge $10 per scooter to the scooter company for relocating them to a more appropriate parking location.

    2. Re:It's a problem with a pretty clear solution by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Informative

      major cities that were laid out with cars in mind

      Name one.

      Los Angeles
      San Diego (my home town)
      Most of California outside of the super-high-density downtown cores

      Hell, I *live* in Downtown San Diego (which is as dense as SD gets) and a) cars are important (though parking is now restricted on 5th Ave during Friday and Saturday nights to make room for Uber pickups), and b) scooters are everywhere and are universally despised despite being pretty fun to ride.

  3. Paying for use of infrasructure by hwstar · · Score: 2

    If a City wants to allow e-scooters, the e-scooter companies should pay for use of City infrastructure via a permit or licensing mechanism so that the scooters can be placed in designated areas carved out near bus stops and the like and not clutter sidewalks. Any e-scooters not licensed or permitted should be impounded.

  4. Re:Vehicles belong on the road, not the pavement by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    There is literally no way to sanely combine a single passage for both pedestrians and vehicles of any form. Governments that allow the abuse of pedestrians by any vehicle do so quite purposely, do DISCOURAGE walking. It is notable that many SF short stories in the 50s and 60s explored this theme, with citizens arrested and given psych evaluations if they insisted on still walking to places outside.

    In the recent past, plebs were purposely controlled by severly limiting their ability to travel any distance beyond tiny limits, and plebs tended to live and die in a very small radius. Today, the SJW movement demonises most methods of travel used by ordinary people. The Deep State intention is a future where the plebs once agian live and die in highly contained regions.

    The 'electric' car and 'oil is bad' movements are a key part opf this strategy. Humans that travel are a problem to the Deep state demons in many ways- not least because they learn that their own societal rules are pretty much arbitary.

    Every quality of life ordinary people enjoy is currently under concentrated attack by warmongering neoliberal outlets like slashdot. Tony Blair's orwellian planetary agenda is hurtling ahead in every major empire power, and forced on the people of the nations controlled by these empires. Those voices that oppose the demonic Blair, and the blairites that impose his will in pretty much every nation are carefully attacked.

    (and yes, I'm aware Britain is one of those nations that currently limits electric vehicles on pavements, but that isn't a counter argument since the Deep State has to tailor its methods for greatest impact in any given society)

    Ding ding ding - we have a winner! You dear AC have combined almost every wing nut touchstone into a nice concise package, and adequately proven that the solution to everything is getting rid of e-scooters!

    Now bonus points if you can wrap the whole thing in a bow, and tell us how this promotes dogs and chinchillas living together in sin, and the damn teenagers dropping thought control pods disguised as fertilizer pellets on your lawn.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  5. I toss them off sidewalks by DogDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're all over my campus. When I encounter one either blocking a sidewalk, or anywhere near a ramp, I toss the fuckers into the bushes/landscaping. They're not mine. They're not the universities. They're not supposed to be there. If anybody else, individual or company, puts anything in the middle of the sidewalk, it's abandoned trash, and as far as I know, anybody can take it. I once saw a blind person walking on a sidewalk and running into one of those things, and I lost my mind.

    See anything abandoned in a sidewalk? It's your moral obligation to get it the fuck out of there for people who can't navigate around them. I've actually gotten good at getting some distance with the fuckers with a single foot under the center of them.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  6. They're banned in some Aus states by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    They exceed 10KM/hr on sidewalks, so you simply can't get the things.

    Which is a bit of a shame, I'd like to try one. As annoying as they apparently are, we have a ridiculous insane population boom here (fuelled by the govt) and public transit and roads have become a nightmare (my morning commute has doubled via public transit, simply due to more stops, more starts, more traffic and more people getting on and off the cable car / tram)

    I'd love to jump on a scooter and get to work that way.

    a 2.5mile trip shouldn't take 45 minutes via public transit. (and yes, Americans, I know I'm the lucky one here with such a short commute)

  7. Re:Let em use the bicycle path by fafalone · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure banning human legs is practical; since they can make you run.

    Scooters by Lime and Bird have a top speed of 15mph, well within the human running range (and not just the top athletes, those guys can hit the mid 20s). Or should running on the sidewalk be banned too? I think the issue isn't speed itself, but unsafe speed. Ticket people being unsafe on these things like we ticket unsafe driving and biking.

  8. Re:Bicycles, bicycles by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    Yes, we are talking about the same thing, and yes it is illegal - although the police and council enforcement officers do have leeway in certain cases.

    Children riding bikes on the pavement is also illegal, but cant be prosecuted under the age of 10 years.

  9. Re:Half right, half backwards, all stupid by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Republicans believe laws are things enforced by an armed government. They aren't suggestions, politicians and bureacrats don't get to follow them *when they feel like it*.

    lol

    Republicans are the gods of selective enforcement, and general hypocrisy. Oh, we can't have a controversial president name a supreme court justice. We have to let the next guy do it. Oh wait, it's our guy, so we have to make sure he names the next justice, hell or high water. Blah blah blah bull fucking shit.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re:I’ve noticed this sort of thing in Seattl by Zaelath · · Score: 2
  11. Re:Good! Get them off the sidewalk by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative

    And in California, riding bicycles on sidewalks is left to the cities. It's illegal in San Francisco, and many of the LA suburbs - you have to use the street. Additionally it is illegal to turn without signalling. And per the link provided above, electric scooters are bundled with motorized bicycles/mopeds - and are thus prohibited from use on the sidewalk. This isn't about utility, this is about legal operation of a vehicle. Riding an electric scooter without an M2 endorsement, without a helmet, or on a sidewalk is illegal.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  12. Re:Bicycles, bicycles by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    It's all the same thing under UK law - pavements are for pedestrians, and anyone riding a bike, scooter or whatever is not a pedestrian. Allowances are made for the disabled, but even then those motorised scooters used by old people should be driven on the street and not the pavement.

    Your cause is lost because your cause is based on a wrong premise - not because we have the wrong end of the stick in responding to you.