Slashdot Mirror


WhatsApp Now Has More Monthly Active Users Than Facebook App (venturebeat.com)

Facebook's $19 billion bet on WhatsApp in 2014, when the messaging app had 450 million active users, is beginning to pay off. From a report: In recent months, WhatsApp has surpassed Facebook's own marquee app in popularity, according to industry estimates. In September of last year, WhatsApp for the first time had more monthly active users worldwide on Android and iPhone platforms than the Facebook app, research firm App Annie said today in its annual State of Mobile report. App Annie did not share specific figures but told VentureBeat that WhatsApp has maintained its lead over the Facebook app since September.

39 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. Up or down? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    App Annie did not share specific figures but told VentureBeat that WhatsApp has maintained its lead over the Facebook app since September.

    ie. People are deleting the Facebook app in droves but not the Whatsapp app (sic).

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Up or down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assuming the Facebook app can even be deleted, depending on the phone.

    2. Re:Up or down? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "ie. People are deleting the Facebook app in droves but not the Whatsapp app (sic)."

      Indeed. It's nice because it's widely used.

      But once I have get their first Ad via Whatsapp, I'll be gone.

  2. I'm one such person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No Facebook in years but I occasionally use Whatsapp to communicate with colleagues, usually in groups and international colleagues. I noticed WhatsApp is quite popular in some geographies.

    Also, sInce the only reason to buy an iPhone is to use Messages and FaceTime, WhatsApp can be a way to wean oneself away from Apple.

    Of course, I don't share my contacts with WhatsApp and I try to touch it only with a proverbial 10 foot pole in general, especially because it's owned by Facebook..

  3. Why is it so popular? by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but most people are totally cool with adding me on Facebook as opposed to giving me their phone number... whatsapp is highly primitive, doesn't do anything I couldn't do with ICQ 20 years ago. I seriously don't get wtf is wrong with these people creating new IM programs all the time.

    1. Re:Why is it so popular? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't need more features than ICQ to be useful, it just has to be widely available, free, and easy to use.

      Whatsapp grew because it did the same thing as SMS but for free (around here you paid per-SMS so this was a massive deal to a lot of people).

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Why is it so popular? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      For me, Whatsapp replaces phone calls, SMSes, and video calls. If I have either wifi or sufficient cellular data, it is completely free (unlike phone calls or SMSes for many people). It lets me see my messages on the computer (unlike SMSes). It easily exports the conversations/messages from the app to your computer (unlike Facebook). It doesn't seem to steal your data or advertise to you (unlike Facebook). And best of all, it is based on phone numbers and nearly everyone has it (unlike ICQ). It is pretty much the best of all worlds - for now at least.

    3. Re:Why is it so popular? by fred6666 · · Score: 2

      It lets me see my messages on the computer (unlike SMSes).

      But it sucks and still rely on your phone to send and receive. Why?

      It easily exports the conversations/messages from the app to your computer (unlike Facebook)

      On the contrary, Facebook does it right. You can shut down your phone and still continue your conversation on your PC.

      And best of all, it is based on phone numbers

      This is one of the major reason for NOT using whatsapp. Phone numbers suck as an identifier. They are usually not free, belong to the carrier, and are location-specific.
      Why should a chat application require a cell phone number is beyond me.

    4. Re: Why is it so popular? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      And worse of all, it doesn't even work on two phones at the same time. Last time I checked at least.
      Who are the idiots who wrote that application?

    5. Re:Why is it so popular? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      But it sucks and still rely on your phone to send and receive. Why?

      My phone is always on, so why not?

      On the contrary, Facebook does it right. You can shut down your phone and still continue your conversation on your PC.

      But Facebook does so many other things wrong... and since my phone is always on, I don't care about this "disadvantage".

      Phone numbers suck as an identifier. They are usually not free, belong to the carrier, and are location-specific.
      Why should a chat application require a cell phone number is beyond me.

      But pretty much everyone has a phone number. Certainly I do. Most businesses will give you a phone number, and once they do, it's easier to contact them by WhatsApp than by regular phone/SMS. BTW, when I fly internationally and no longer have phone service, WhatsApp on my phone still works perfectly (as long as I have data from wifi, of course). It lets me use the phone as a regular phone anywhere in the world, for zero cost and no ads.

    6. Re:Why is it so popular? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      But it sucks and still rely on your phone to send and receive. Why?

      My phone is always on, so why not?

      You are right, why make it good when you can make it suck?
      My toaster is also always connected to the grid, so why not relay whatsapp messages through it? What could possibly goes wrong?

      On the contrary, Facebook does it right. You can shut down your phone and still continue your conversation on your PC.

      But Facebook does so many other things wrong... and since my phone is always on, I don't care about this "disadvantage".

      Facebook is just one of many that does that right. There are dozens of chat services NOT requiring you to have a phone and especially not powered on and with signal (cell data or wifi) to use. Why use one of the only one that suck that much?

      Phone numbers suck as an identifier. They are usually not free, belong to the carrier, and are location-specific.
      Why should a chat application require a cell phone number is beyond me.

      But pretty much everyone has a phone number. Certainly I do.

      Not everyone has a phone number which can receive SMS to activate whatsapp. Some people share phone numbers. In the end, it's one of the worse ID they could find. What's wrong with email and password?

      Most businesses will give you a phone number, and once they do, it's easier to contact them by WhatsApp than by regular phone/SMS.

      I disagree. Most businesses can NOT be contacted through whatsapp (or SMS). More businesses can still be contacted by fax than by whatsapp. You must be living under a rock.

      BTW, when I fly internationally and no longer have phone service, WhatsApp on my phone still works perfectly (as long as I have data from wifi, of course). It lets me use the phone as a regular phone anywhere in the world, for zero cost and no ads.

      No it doesn't. You can't call any real phone number, only whatsapp people. It's very limited.
      But there are dozens of apps/protocols which again, allow you to do the same (Internet audio calls), with less limitations and very bad design decisions than whatsapp. I can't find a single good reason to use it, really. Plus it's owned by Facebook.

  4. Re:Starting to pay off? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It doesn't have to. Facebook paid $19 billion just so nobody else could have it.

    I have noticed that if I message somebody I haven't messaged in a while using Whatsapp then a bunch of their posts will mysteriously appear on Facebook.

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Is it "paying off"? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

    Whatsapp still has no ads (as far as I can tell), and its messages are encrypted (so no data mining). So it appears Facebook isn't making money off of it. So in what sense is the $19 billion investment "paying off"?

    1. Re:Is it "paying off"? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Facebook doesn't know the message contents but I doubt they care about that.

      The important thing is WHO you message, and how often.

      eg. Just yesterday I whatsapped a guy I haven't contacted for a year or so and an hour later a whole bunch of his posts appeared on Facebook. Coincidence? Nope.

      Also: A large part of that $19 billion was just to keep Whatsapp out of the hands of Google/Microsoft.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Is it "paying off"? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      "messages are encrypted"

      You don't know that. The source is closed and it all goes through their servers.

    3. Re: Is it "paying off"? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Facebook is harvesting your contact info but they can't read your messages.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Is it "paying off"? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      They're making money off of your every action on their platform. If you seriously think that there's a very large group of servers running world-wide, dedicated to serving you and your loved ones, all for free - you're sadly mistaken, my friend. 'You and your interactions with others' is their product. Your gains in this system are made by the illusion of interacting with your loved ones in a way that's meaningful to you and them. Their model to predict your future actions is second to none, because no one doubts the data and how it's presented.

      But you don't care about all of this because I'm just another nutter running around spreading FUD.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:Is it "paying off"? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of your Gmail account, your Android or Apple phone, your Windows computer, and so on. None of which even claim that the company can't read your stuff. And nobody has disproven Whatsapp's claim, as far as I know.

      So while it is inferior in terms of privacy to an open source computer you have built the software stack for yourself, it's superior to pretty much anything else.

  6. I've used it for years... here's my take... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but most people are totally cool with adding me on Facebook as opposed to giving me their phone number... whatsapp is highly primitive, doesn't do anything I couldn't do with ICQ 20 years ago. I seriously don't get wtf is wrong with these people creating new IM programs all the time.

    I have a group of friends in another part of the US. They invited me to a WhatsApp group about 4 years ago. I downloaded it and immediately liked it. Here is what it offers for me over my normal texting app:
    - supports long messages
    - built-in ability to record audio clips
    - supports large images
    - supports large videos... I've gotten 30+MB videos from friends.
    - ability to send location/audio/video/other files (e.g. txt, pdf, etc). I once sent a 30 MB PDF to a friend via WA. Can't even email that!
    - group chat - this is the main reason I use it, as there are about 10 people in the current chat. I know you can group text, but this is just done much better. I also have a GC with my wife and daughter.
    - integrated audio/video calls
    - works over wifi - this was especially helpful for me when i traveled to india. I could turn off my service and just use wifi.
    - I can WA with people in India (and when I was there) without phone service
    - more reliable! I always get WA messages, I often don't get calls or texts. (same with my wife, who has a different phone)
    - WA web - it is really nice to pull up WA on my computer and use it there.

    The serious downside I see is that it is now owned by FB, which I don't use or want to use. But I like WA so much I don't want to drop it.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      The serious downside I see is that it is now owned by FB, which I don't use or want to use. But I like WA so much I don't want to drop it.

      Your could explore Telegram , which has all the features you mention (with bigger metrics), and more.

    2. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      - WA web - it is really nice to pull up WA on my computer and use it there.

      I just tried to use it and it ask me to to scan a bar code on my phone. Who's the idiot who designed that?

    3. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by Frederic54 · · Score: 2

      What's the difference with Messenger then?!?

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by gosand · · Score: 1

      Your phone has to be on the wifi network that your pc is on... you open up WA, choose Web from the menu, and it turns on the camera and you scan it. Boom, you are signed in, with all of your chats and history. It's pretty slick.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by gosand · · Score: 1

      It was all like that before FB bought it, and luckily they haven't ruined it by monkeying with it.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      it's very dumb you mean. They've never though of giving the option to login with a username or password? What if I don't want/have a cell phone, or if it is discharged?

    7. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by gosand · · Score: 1

      it's very dumb you mean. They've never though of giving the option to login with a username or password? What if I don't want/have a cell phone, or if it is discharged?

      Wow, seriously? It's a mobile app. If you don't have a phone then you aren't really their target market.
      Can you use FB on your computer if it isn't plugged in? What about if you don't have internet access, how are you supposed to use it then?

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      It's not only a mobile app. It's also a web app that I should be able to use on my PC. Somehow, they designed it so that you can't use it on the PC without a phone.

    9. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by gosand · · Score: 2

      You should probably send WhatsApp a tersely worded email expressing your outrage.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    10. Re:I've used it for years... here's my take... by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      or you know, I'll just not use whatsapp. It's not as it if had any feature not present in other chat clients.

  7. Am I Missing something? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    These messenger apps, have been doing the same thing for the past 20+ years?
    I never really see a reason to switch other then the fact the people who I want to chat with are on an other service?
    I remember doing ICQ, to AOL Instant Messenger, Then to Facebook messenger. Over the decades I havn't really seen any killer feature in them. The biggest features I have seen was Group Chats, and image and video attachments.
    They all seem to want to give us Ads, an or collect my data, and have to go via some sort of centralized server where any message could be spied upon.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Post-post-posrt-facebook.... by DrYak · · Score: 2

    People are deleting the Facebook app in droves but not the Whatsapp app (sic).

    And in fact WhatsApp is still rising in popularity, which was the entire point behind buying it (and Instagram) back then.

    Zuckerberg has seen predecessors coming and going (thing MySpace's fall from popularity).

    That eventually Facebook will wane out was absolutely totally predictable, it wasn't a question of "if" but "when".

    So of course, Zuckerberg paid extremely close attention to emerging *future competitor* (instead of contemporary competitors), and bought them to be ready for the "Post-Facebook" era.
    WhatsApp and Instagram were the under-dog apps rising in popularity (specially among younger generations) back then, the Zuckerberg bought them, and had the "Post-Facebook" era insured.
    (And laughs anytime people are outraged and delete the Facebook App)

    The problem is not Facebook (Zuckerberg is already prepared for that).
    The problem is what comes after the "Post-facebook" era, what will come after Instagram and WhatsApp, when people will start deleting *that* one. The "Post-post-facebook" era, if you will.

    Snapchat and musica.li/Tiktok seems to be the one rising in popularity in the youngest generation (kids don't want to be on the same platform as their parents, but the same as their friends. Network effect in social media doesn't seem to last over several generations).
    The huge problem, the thorn in the foot of Zuckerberg's Machiavellian plan to perpetuity, is that the first one has actively resisted any attempt of buy out, and the second is doing its own merging and buyouts and becoming a sizable competitor in China (And who knows, might even end up being bought by Tencent, depending on how their current kerfuffle ends up).

    So Zuckerberg sadly doesn't have any solid plan for after WhatsApp, the "Post-post-facebook" era.
    But then, by that time he might be retiring with his billiion and letting Facebook try to survive on its own (see Bill Gates and Microsoft).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Post-post-posrt-facebook.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Considering that WhatsApp has fallen way behind its competitors in features since Facebook purchased it, I'd be surprised if it was still in a growth phase. Asian competitors like LINE and WeChat have economic ecosystems behind them now that make them profitable as well as pulling in new customers. WhatsApp on the other hand is restrained from doing anything that might compete with the parent company's main app, so they are sticking at basic messaging that pretends to be secure and private while siphoning information to government agencies.

  9. Yes, it's worth $42/user. Over some time frame by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If it's worth $4 per user per year, they made a 10% return on their money this year and that amount is growing. So yes, it's probably worth $42/user - over some time period. And the number of users is growing.

    The big question is return of principal AND investment return. Will the popularity of WhatsApp either last long enough or grow big enough, or be sold for enough, to only make good return on the investment each year, but also get the $18 billion back. It'll almost certainly generate $18 billion, but Facebook already had $18 billion they spent on WhatsApp. It needs to return double that over ten years to be a good investment.

  10. For good reason by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Everybody in Africa uses it to make free phone calls!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. Because FB is p3rVy and only olds use it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seriously, it's not because WA is any good, it's because FB is so bad and only old people use it anymore.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. Yes and no by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The numbers show that users are switching from Facebook to WhatsApp. The purchase didn't change that.

    The people who own Facebook now also own WhatsApp.

    In some contexts that makes a big difference, in some contexts it doesn't.

  13. Split by aleck7 · · Score: 1

    Would be fun to watch FB die separately of WhatsUp and Instagram if they FB will get split. Though it won't be, as WeChat is not going anywhere...

  14. WhatsApp and Facebook by bjwest · · Score: 1

    Facebook owns WhatsApp, so what's the fucking difference? You think they keep your data isolated? If you use WhatsApp, you are a Facebook user as well, or might as well be, and your data goes to the same places.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
    1. Re:WhatsApp and Facebook by negan16 · · Score: 1

      It's really weird, I thought that WhatsApp was going to disappear in a few years, I was wrong. https://www.minimilitia.mobi/ https://www.applock.ooo/ https://www.7zip.vip/