Slashdot Mirror


Rich Kids Are Cheating in School With Apple Watches (theoutline.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: There is, however, one demographic that has embraced the Apple Watch with open arms: tech-savvy, upper middle-class teens and tweens. The watch is a convenient workaround for classroom cell-phone bans; it can be used for everything from texting to cheating on tests. [...] Julia Rubin, a former middle-school teacher at a private school in New York City, said that when the Apple Watch first came out in 2014, a handful of students got them as presents for the holidays.

When Rubin asked her school's principal to ban the watches the same way the school banned cell phones, she refused. In addition to kids texting during class, there is growing concern that smart watches could be used to help kids cheat during exams. In fact, there is a wealth of YouTube videos showing teens how to do precisely that, usually with the disclaimer that they are only sharing this information "for entertainment purposes."

[...] Nikias Molina, 20, is a Spanish vlogger who runs the YouTube channel Apple World. A slender, dark-haired kid with braces and a slight European accent, Molina posted a 2018 video showing subscribers how to use various apps on the Apple Watch to cheat on exams. As he demonstrates in the video and explained to me, there are apps you can download onto the Apple Watch to save PDFs, but the most common method is to take a photo of a cheat sheet and pull it up on the Apple Watch, which doesn't require internet accessibility. The response to the video was mixed -- "students were thanking me [in the comments], and teachers were hating on me" -- but the video racked up more than 115,000 views.

22 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Don't understand by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the difference between pulling up a cheat sheet on your watch and having one stuck in your sock? I suppose you could keep more material on your watch, but as everyone who's ever written an open book test knows, more material is a curse, not a blessing.

    If you see a kid fiddling with their smart watch during a test, fail them. Can't do that? THAT's your problem, not the watch.

  2. Re:Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll go one further. "Rich kids" because they have an Apple Watch? Really? Now the definition between "rich" and "poor" is based on a $349 device?

  3. Bad exam design ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Design the exams like university level exams, where a cheat (equation) sheet is allowed, but you actually need to understand the material to finish the exam in time. regurgitation based exams are stupid.

    1. Re:Bad exam design ... by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Fundamentally the issue here is not that students are cheating, but that tests are designed the same way there were 50 years ago, and are measuring the same kind of useless knowledge that lead to the problems we have in the 1970's.

      Take the Advanced Placement exams, from the college board. These are college level exams where you have all the knowledge in front of you, and you need to understand the application to get a high score. However, the test is ultimately measuring your ability to fill in the correct bubble so any rational person, if they can, is simply going to get a list of correct answer choices and fill them in. Yes, many tests have a written section so you must know something, but on many AP tests the written section is not the limiting factor.

      if you are not interested in rank and file, but knowledge, then there are a number of innovated ways that one can ask questions in a computer based exam that both give an somewhat individualized test to each student and can be graded automatically. The student can be given all the content, and can even be allowed to 'cheat' to find other content, but the cheating is not free. I costs time and points as the students will not be able to complete as many questions as the student that is familiar with the subject.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Bad exam design ... by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my current exams, I let the students use all lecture slides and their own notes and their own summary of the lecture. Does not have any impact on results, but the students learn more because they revise the material better this way. One student even commented in the eval that he expected the lecture summary he did to be quite useful in the future. We are in the information age, even if many teachers and lecturers have not realized that. Restricting access to information too much, giving too little time, etc. are just very bad ways to increase exam difficulty. They are easy to do though, so they are a favorite of intellectually lazy teachers.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Bad exam design ... by ranton · · Score: 2

      What kind of equations did you use in History? There are plenty of subjects where that kind of test just isn't possible. Even in sciences (gross anatomy comes to mind, had lots of memorization in that one).

      Others have already pointed out there are much better ways to test knowledge of history than to ask what year Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

      It isn't always just poor test design. Often it is poor curriculum design too. If your history test only tests an amount of knowledge you can fit on a cheat sheet, you are only asking for cramming of information (into either their brain or cheat sheet). If you really care that much about memorization, and this is actually important enough information to know long term, test randomly on any material you have covered so far that semester. Don't give an opportunity to study/cram for tests, or an opportunity to build cheat sheets.

      The best college classes I had almost always had open book exams. If you needed to use the book extensively, you would never finish the test on time.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:Bad exam design ... by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that teachers often are told that they can't assess like that, because students need a clear-cut answer. Because subjectively grading that might lead to bias, and it would be better to have a multiple choice test with well defined answers so that nobody can complain about unfair grading.

      If we could let teachers be professionals and hold them to high standards, without parental or student interference, that would really help. Unfortunately, we don't pay most public school teachers enough to get great ones, and a lot of administrators (and teachers themselves) aren't interested in fighting asshole parents who often are looking for As for their kid and are seeking any way to manipulate the system to get them.

      If your kid fails a multiple choice test, the best you can do is argue that the question was vague or the answer options were wrong. Both are fairly easy to counter-argue. If your kid fails a 1 hr essay on why the Maginot line was ineffective, you can attack that from all sorts of angles including bias on the part of the teacher, and them asking kids for something that doesn't have a well-defined answer. And parents (at least in the US) are insane enough that some will throw fits in the school or district office, and show up at school board meetings to shit on a teacher who didn't give their kid an A. And who will sue everyone even tangentially involved.

      This leads schools to dissuade this sort of very good exam writing in favor of cut-and-dried shit that would easily stand up in court. Yet another fantastic knock-on effect of the US legal system!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  4. I cheated on my metaphysics exam by Potor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I looked into the soul of the girl beside me. (Woody Allen)

  5. Re:Social Justice Warriors by deadaluspark · · Score: 2

    It is relevant because the kids who do more successfully in school, and who already have families who are at least somewhat well to do will end up with better credentials than their peers, thus their connections and better (faked) credentials will secure them a better position than their peers who did not cheat. Due to this, you'll end up with a society which is falling apart at the seems because the people managing the society all faked their way to those positions, don't actually know what they're doing, and the people who didn't fake it and DO know what they're doing are stuck doing thankless jobs. Source: I had a friend who was paid to write research papers for people far less intelligent and educated than him, who just happened to have much more money, and who would go on to gruaduate from better schools with better credentials, but HIS work is what got them there. The point is that capital twists and infects everything and undermines any ability of our society to truly be "meritocratic" when the metrics of our merits are skewed by those who use their capital to get ahead in the system.

  6. Re:Social Justice Warriors by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now the definition between "rich" and "poor" is based on a $349 device?

    How to tell the difference between a "rich" kid and a "poor" kid:

    A "rich" kid wears a $349 Apple Watch.

    A "poor" kid wears a pair of $349 Nikes.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  7. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Came here for this. The title is certainly a little click bait with the inference that a several hundred dollar watch separates the rich from the poor. I am very wealthy and have a 120 dollar casio solar radio controlled watch, and I know many people who make much less than I do with the latest iDoodad. I waste my money on plenty of other things so as not to be critical of choices, but to conclude that you can evaluate the socioeconomic class of a person based on a watch they are wear is ridiculous. Now if is a limited issue swiss watch from the Bern exhibits in the 400K price range, well then maybe, but even then those are all mechanical and you couldn't use them very easily to cheat.

    Also if it is such an issue, how about just making students remove their watch during exams. That doesn't seem like a very complicated solution. Or even better make them put their phone and watch on a table up in the front of the class. When I was in medical school you had to leave your phone up front and it had to be powered off during the test, if it rang or made noise you would fail the exam (probably more compliance than people on airplanes using airplane mode). In 4 years of medical school I never heard 1 phone go off, that's pretty impressive.

    I also agree with the commentor below. If you are writing a good exam, there isn't much you could fit on an easily accessible cheat sheet that would be useful at all. I have seen a couple of Youtube videos of people showing you how to put small pieces of paper with formula written on them inside a click-pen so you can scroll through a few formula, maybe I just don't remember being in 7th grade, but if you have taken the time to write something out that is so brief you probably have it memorized already. In one example they had written a few of the trig identities as an example, but if you know sin^2+cos^2=1 you can just divide though by whatever function you want there really is literally no reason to cheat. You want sec just divide by cos^2 to get tan^2 + 1 = sec^2. But in today's education system so much is put on memorization and not enough is put on actually understanding what you are doing.

  8. Trim but flunked by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I tried to use a Fitbit to cheat, but having to move my legs gave it away.

  9. Apple Watch != "rich" by slasher999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An Apple Watch may not be cheap, but having one hardly makes anyone rich. We really have a strange way of measuring wealth in this country.

  10. Re:Social Justice Warriors by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    No reasonable person who is having trouble putting food on the table is buying a $349 watch. Some unreasonable poor people do stupid things, but that doesn't define the metric.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Re: Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 3

    The headline is misleading and inflammatory. I'm not rich (middle class) and I sent my kids to private school for a better education than the crap public education system. People can make choices and sacrifice (ie, I didn't pay for garbage cable TV and other such nonsense) to send their kids to private school.

  12. Re:Thats alright by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aluminum is nothing compared to Wifi waves and GMOs! Fortunately Himalayan salt candles and kombucha can mitigate the effects when used rectally.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. "European" accent? by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really? A "European" accent?

    Can they mean "speaks Spanish like a Spaniard rather than a Mexican/Puerto Rican/American/etc," or "speaks English with a Spanish, rather than Mexican/etc accent."

    Or perhaps it means they are unable to distinguish between the accents of the Spanish, Greeks, Italians, French, Germans, Poles, Finns, Swedes or British, let alone the regions thereof? (other European countries are available)

    Whatever they mean, it adds nothing to the actual story and serves only to demonstrate the laziness and ignorance of this "journalist," and the ineptitude of the editorial oversight processes of this "publication."

    Sorry, but this sort of thing really pisses me off - if copy like this came across my desk (OK, so it wouldn't actually, but you know what I mean), words would be had... probably starting with "bollocks."

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  14. Cheating isn't new - solutions exist. by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was university back in the late 70s. Kids would program their calculators with the formulas. Teaching assistants would walk around and reset i.e. wipe the memory on everybody's calculator before the exam started. Most professors allowed students to bring a single 8 1/2 x 11 cheat sheet to the exams. The point of the exam wasn't to find out if you could memorize the formulas, it was to find out if you knew how to apply them.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  15. Watches are banned at my university by DogDude · · Score: 2

    At the university I attend (US, top tier research, public school), watches are already banned from the testing centers. I guess it's been a thing for a little while. I was wondering why the heck watches were banned from the testing centers. I couldn't think of a way to cheat with regular watches.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  16. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

    A poor kid has his cheat sheet scotch-taped to the back of their Timex.

  17. You're assuming the purpose is journalism by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're assuming the purpose of TFA is investigative journalism. To bring an important issue to the public's attention.

    It's not. The purpose is to generate more page loads and thus more advertising revenue. So if inflammatory insinuations - like singling out kids who wear an Apple Watch, or speak with a "Europeant" accent - gets you all in a huff to where you click on TFA, then it's done its job. It's one of the reasons I'm not that critical of comments here from people who haven't read TFA. So many of articles are click-bait that I won't fault someone for using a too-stringent anti-click-bait filter and not reading TFA.

  18. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Livius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that is incredibly racist.

    you never mentioned race

    Something isn't racist merely because it (possibly) has some correlation with race.

    Misusing words like 'racist' makes fighting actual racism harder, not easier.