Slashdot Mirror


Rich Kids Are Cheating in School With Apple Watches (theoutline.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: There is, however, one demographic that has embraced the Apple Watch with open arms: tech-savvy, upper middle-class teens and tweens. The watch is a convenient workaround for classroom cell-phone bans; it can be used for everything from texting to cheating on tests. [...] Julia Rubin, a former middle-school teacher at a private school in New York City, said that when the Apple Watch first came out in 2014, a handful of students got them as presents for the holidays.

When Rubin asked her school's principal to ban the watches the same way the school banned cell phones, she refused. In addition to kids texting during class, there is growing concern that smart watches could be used to help kids cheat during exams. In fact, there is a wealth of YouTube videos showing teens how to do precisely that, usually with the disclaimer that they are only sharing this information "for entertainment purposes."

[...] Nikias Molina, 20, is a Spanish vlogger who runs the YouTube channel Apple World. A slender, dark-haired kid with braces and a slight European accent, Molina posted a 2018 video showing subscribers how to use various apps on the Apple Watch to cheat on exams. As he demonstrates in the video and explained to me, there are apps you can download onto the Apple Watch to save PDFs, but the most common method is to take a photo of a cheat sheet and pull it up on the Apple Watch, which doesn't require internet accessibility. The response to the video was mixed -- "students were thanking me [in the comments], and teachers were hating on me" -- but the video racked up more than 115,000 views.

129 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Don't understand by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the difference between pulling up a cheat sheet on your watch and having one stuck in your sock? I suppose you could keep more material on your watch, but as everyone who's ever written an open book test knows, more material is a curse, not a blessing.

    If you see a kid fiddling with their smart watch during a test, fail them. Can't do that? THAT's your problem, not the watch.

    1. Re:Don't understand by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between pulling up a cheat sheet on your watch and having one stuck in your sock?

      The difference is whether or not your parents can make a hefty donation to the school's endowment.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re: Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or the teacher could simply say "no watches during tests" and make them take them off.

    3. Re:Don't understand by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, _that_ I would not call cheating. That is more keeping your synapses free of utterly useless and demented crap.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Don't understand by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      So since you cheated on your Spanish test, you are now much more likely to say, "Mi papa tiene 50 anos" when you meant to say, "Mi papá tiene 50 años"

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Don't understand by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      ehh the watch can be less circumspect. MUCH less circumspect.

      --
      Just another second banana
    6. Re:Don't understand by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The difference is, the difference between being a Theranos princess and well a prison sentence. Cheating in school, has real world consequences, just like dropping out, yeah, you will be shite at your chosen profession and likely end up with prison sentence ;/.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:Don't understand by ranton · · Score: 1

      If you cheat, you should be expelled. Period.

      Considering even self reported polls show about 2/3 of students cheat in high-school, expulsion is a bit dramatic. And considering the chances of getting caught cheating are so low, any significant punishment creates more unfairness than the cheating itself. Cheating as a moral failing rates somewhere around going 10 miles over the speed limit on an interstate.

      There are plenty of ways to reduce cheating; many of them mentioned in this article's comments. More significant punishment is usually the worst option of reducing any unwanted behavior.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    8. Re:Don't understand by tomknight · · Score: 1

      Or rather, just copy the exam conditions in the UK. No watches, no devices at all other than the prescribed calculator, and from what I understand you must even be willing to show the memory of this... Also, clear pencil cases, clear water bottles.

      --
      Oh arse
    9. Re:Don't understand by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Because it's simple to write an app for the watch that doesn't require you to fiddle with it to cheat - which means the teach would have to be able to see all the kids watch faces (which is circumventable by having the accelerometer hide/unhide the ui with arm movement.)

      --
      Loading...
    10. Re: Don't understand by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Or the teacher could simply say "no watches during tests" and make them take them off.

      Like they finally did with graphics calculators. I used to program my graphics calculator with all the formulas and answers... but then I'd never actually need to use it to cheat during the test, because I'd remember the answers after programming them into my calculator.

      With my kids now, they wipe the memory of the calculators before a test so they can't cheat... schools slowly learn.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:Don't understand by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever invigilated an exam? You don't see kids fiddling with bits of paper. You see them suspiciously staring at something other than the middle distance, usually in the region of their crotches. The watch is even more suspicious.

    12. Re:Don't understand by ranton · · Score: 1

      So since you cheated on your Spanish test, you are now much more likely to say, "Mi papa tiene 50 anos" when you meant to say, "Mi papá tiene 50 años"

      I'm not likely to say either. Google will speak it for me after I speak the English version of the statement into my phone.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    13. Re: Don't understand by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school, the teacher would confiscate all phones (which you weren't supposed to have anyway, and your parents would have to pay $20 to reclaim it from the principal). She would come around and clear the memory on your TI-83 as well, if you were not using a district provided calculator. There is no reason why these same policies can't be implemented now, other than teachers wanting to avoid the difficult part of their profession- telling kids no. But yes, writing answers on your arm under your sleeve worked just fine too.

    14. Re:Don't understand by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      It's a way to call out "rich" kids and further class warfare.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    15. Re:Don't understand by mcvos · · Score: 1

      So to cheat effectively, you need something to stare at in the middle distance. I think a less conspicuous descendant of Google Glass may provide just that.

    16. Re:Don't understand by houghi · · Score: 1

      I once told a teacher I was going to cheat. He stll did not catch me. I had a blazer on and a paper with an elastic band that I could pull out and would shoot back when I released it.

      I actually cheated, even though I did not needed to, as I had put more time in making the paper smaller and smaller, so that I learned it anyway. Stupid brain!

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re: Don't understand by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1

      We had the same policy with the TI calculators. Worked great, until one of the students wrote a "clearing" script that made it appear that the calculator was wiped when, in fact, it was not. Looked just about perfect; none of the teachers caught it.

      What caught the whole system was what catches most systems like this: one student scored way, way higher than he had any right to, was questioned about it, and folded about the scam. That ended the use of "bring your own calculator".

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    18. Re:Don't understand by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      I once told a teacher I was going to cheat. He stll did not catch me. I had a blazer on and a paper with an elastic band that I could pull out and would shoot back when I released it.

      I actually cheated, even though I did not needed to, as I had put more time in making the paper smaller and smaller, so that I learned it anyway. Stupid brain!

      yep that's the problem with cheating. to do it well enough to be maximized efficient you end up having to know the material to the point where it doesn't make as much sense.

      --
      Just another second banana
    19. Re:Don't understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      More significant punishment is usually the worst option of reducing any unwanted behavior.

      Yeah but it's the easiest so three guesses what they'll go with.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    20. Re:Don't understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Hit the place with an EMP too

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    21. Re:Don't understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Current under tension is equal? Current under tension is expandable? Current under tension is expensive? What does this mean? What does any of it mean? I've covered my body in complete and utter and total absolute nonsense gibberish!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  2. Social Justice Warriors by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why is it in anyway relevant that they are "rich kids"" It's unfair, because "poor kids" cannot also cheat? What about taking them all away, so no one can cheat?

    1. Re:Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll go one further. "Rich kids" because they have an Apple Watch? Really? Now the definition between "rich" and "poor" is based on a $349 device?

    2. Re: Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The guy works at a private school in NY. Yes, the kids are rich.

    3. Re:Social Justice Warriors by deadaluspark · · Score: 2

      It is relevant because the kids who do more successfully in school, and who already have families who are at least somewhat well to do will end up with better credentials than their peers, thus their connections and better (faked) credentials will secure them a better position than their peers who did not cheat. Due to this, you'll end up with a society which is falling apart at the seems because the people managing the society all faked their way to those positions, don't actually know what they're doing, and the people who didn't fake it and DO know what they're doing are stuck doing thankless jobs. Source: I had a friend who was paid to write research papers for people far less intelligent and educated than him, who just happened to have much more money, and who would go on to gruaduate from better schools with better credentials, but HIS work is what got them there. The point is that capital twists and infects everything and undermines any ability of our society to truly be "meritocratic" when the metrics of our merits are skewed by those who use their capital to get ahead in the system.

    4. Re:Social Justice Warriors by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now the definition between "rich" and "poor" is based on a $349 device?

      How to tell the difference between a "rich" kid and a "poor" kid:

      A "rich" kid wears a $349 Apple Watch.

      A "poor" kid wears a pair of $349 Nikes.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Came here for this. The title is certainly a little click bait with the inference that a several hundred dollar watch separates the rich from the poor. I am very wealthy and have a 120 dollar casio solar radio controlled watch, and I know many people who make much less than I do with the latest iDoodad. I waste my money on plenty of other things so as not to be critical of choices, but to conclude that you can evaluate the socioeconomic class of a person based on a watch they are wear is ridiculous. Now if is a limited issue swiss watch from the Bern exhibits in the 400K price range, well then maybe, but even then those are all mechanical and you couldn't use them very easily to cheat.

      Also if it is such an issue, how about just making students remove their watch during exams. That doesn't seem like a very complicated solution. Or even better make them put their phone and watch on a table up in the front of the class. When I was in medical school you had to leave your phone up front and it had to be powered off during the test, if it rang or made noise you would fail the exam (probably more compliance than people on airplanes using airplane mode). In 4 years of medical school I never heard 1 phone go off, that's pretty impressive.

      I also agree with the commentor below. If you are writing a good exam, there isn't much you could fit on an easily accessible cheat sheet that would be useful at all. I have seen a couple of Youtube videos of people showing you how to put small pieces of paper with formula written on them inside a click-pen so you can scroll through a few formula, maybe I just don't remember being in 7th grade, but if you have taken the time to write something out that is so brief you probably have it memorized already. In one example they had written a few of the trig identities as an example, but if you know sin^2+cos^2=1 you can just divide though by whatever function you want there really is literally no reason to cheat. You want sec just divide by cos^2 to get tan^2 + 1 = sec^2. But in today's education system so much is put on memorization and not enough is put on actually understanding what you are doing.

    6. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're looking for some kind of SJW narrative that isn't there and are putting your perceptions/delusions on stage for everyone to see.

      They mention "rich kids" because most normal people can't afford a smart watch, meaning that this type of cheating is more exclusive to the wealthy. In my own experience that's true, in university we had two rich assholes (drove fancy cars, smoked weed 24/7, parents were doctors -- typical worthless human beings) who cheated using their watches. Both were terrible engineers and still graduated because we don't expel foreign (Indian/Chinese 99% of the time) students for any reason, even cheating, in order to get federal funding pumping into the university.

      Anyway, stop being a proto-Nazi brigading piece of shit with all your SJW talk. Guys like you make the rest of us white folk look like fucking monsters. If you want to lick Trump or Hitler's boots, you are welcome to do so, but keep that shit to yourself and your weak-minded brethren.

    7. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Better yet, what about just not trying to control everything everyone does? Why should anyone care if someone cheats? What difference does it make?

    8. Re:Social Justice Warriors by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      No reasonable person who is having trouble putting food on the table is buying a $349 watch. Some unreasonable poor people do stupid things, but that doesn't define the metric.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re: Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 3

      The headline is misleading and inflammatory. I'm not rich (middle class) and I sent my kids to private school for a better education than the crap public education system. People can make choices and sacrifice (ie, I didn't pay for garbage cable TV and other such nonsense) to send their kids to private school.

    10. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      A poor kid has his cheat sheet scotch-taped to the back of their Timex.

    11. Re: Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tl;dr
      Because it reinforces the SJW Socialist ideal which states that people only have more than you because they are filthy lying cheaters.

    12. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Iconoclysm · · Score: 1

      This is easily one of the stupidest comments I've ever read on the Internet. What difference does it make?!?!?

    13. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Kohath · · Score: 1

      And yet you have no answer

    14. Re: Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, you're the idiot that's wrong with America.

      The person you're speaking of is trying to help the kids. A great way to do that is to avoid public schools and loser kids like yours.

    15. Re: Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 1

      Boy that's a lot of assumptions. I did not go into debt to pay for it. I actually lived within my means. And the attitude and demeanor of your posting is a better indicator of who is a "prick".

    16. Re:Social Justice Warriors by bluelip · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are an idiot. Stereotypes exist for a reason.

      It looks like Nike sponsors section 8 housing.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    17. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Livius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is incredibly racist.

      you never mentioned race

      Something isn't racist merely because it (possibly) has some correlation with race.

      Misusing words like 'racist' makes fighting actual racism harder, not easier.

    18. Re:Social Justice Warriors by clovis · · Score: 1

      Better yet, what about just not trying to control everything everyone does? Why should anyone care if someone cheats? What difference does it make?

      There are several reasons we care about cheating in school, and it has to do with why we give tests and grade them in the first place.
      It mostly has to do with the fact that society is competitive and there is not enough to go around, so we want to give resources to the people who will do the best job with those resources. People who cheat can get the rewards that should have gone to a more talented and hard working non-cheater.

      And secondly, society is harmed when people get into positions for which they are not competent and later have to be fired because work is not getting done..
      Society cares because no one wants a doctor that cheated his way through and does not actually know the content.
      Society does not want to have engineers designing buildings that have pieces fall off because the engineer got hired on the basis of grades that promised skills he doesn't actually have.
      An employer does not want to have an assistant for a job that requires knowledge of a second language, if that person had cheated his way through the courses.

      On a personal level, people who cheat can get better grades than people who do not cheat, given similar levels of talent. If they have better grades than you, they get into better schools (or grad school) that have more opportunities for the social contacts necessary for getting the best jobs.

    19. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Kohath · · Score: 1

      It mostly has to do with the fact that society is competitive and there is not enough to go around,

      Learning is unlimited.

      Society cares because no one wants a doctor that cheated his way through and does not actually know the content.

      If a cheater could genuinely make it all the way through medical school without knowing the material, then your medical school system is a sham.

      ...engineers ... an assistant...etc.

      I don't believe stories like this. If an employer can be fooled into hiring someone dumb, that employer needs to learn how to not be a fool. If an engineer can fool the other engineers over and over and over, enough times to build something that gets past them and then breaks, then honest mistakes will get past them too. Be better at your job.

      On a personal level, people who cheat can get better grades than people who do not cheat, given similar levels of talent. If they have better grades than you, they get into better schools (or grad school) that have more opportunities for the social contacts necessary for getting the best jobs.

      Smart, talented, hard-working people succeed, regardless of whether someone else cheats. If someone enjoys some additional success, in addition to being smart and talented and hard-working, then it's because they are additionally skilled at something people value, even if the specifics make you frown.

      I understand that some people have status anxiety and want to guard the integrity of their personal status by excluding others -- especially when they think they have a good reason. You guys should all get over it. If you want higher status, be more valuable to your fellow man rather than finding a righteous justification to keep your fellow man down.

    20. Re: Social Justice Warriors by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      I appreciate freedom of choice and all, but you could've been more magnanimous and gotten involved in your local "crap" public education system to make it better for all. It's really not hard. Every spring - assuming you're in the US - your local board of education has a seat or two open. In my district, 100 signatures on a petition got me on the ballot. Even if you don't win, you could attend public BOE sessions and offer constructive criticism. At most of our meetings, we had almost zero public participation. Everyone assumes "someone else" will do it. Why not you? You pay taxes for this service in any case; you might as well try to make it better.

    21. Re:Social Justice Warriors by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A "poor" kid wears a pair of $349 Nikes.

      If your kid paid $349 for Nikes he's not poor, he's incredibly dumb.

      Posted while wearing a set of Nikes that cost 1/3rd of that.

    22. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Misusing words like 'racist' makes fighting actual racism harder, not easier."

      That's the point. Accusations of racism are awesome tools to create division when none exist.

    23. Re: Social Justice Warriors by bagboy · · Score: 1

      While I don't disagree, the unfortunate principals of being public means that you have to cater to the lowest common denominator. My wife worked as a TA for a local public middle school. She tried to make meaningful contributions, but quit when it became apparent that catering to the minority meant that a special needs child, bedridden due to a genetic disorder of some sort, was to be accommodated in the regular classroom scenario so they could feel "normal". This also meant my wife, who is not a nurse, would be required to change his diaper throughout the day. The parents were affluent lawyers and my guess is the district caved rather than face a lawsuit. The public system is broken in so many ways and the number one issue is threats of lawsuits. Private education can set their own rules generally, so you know going in what you get and the contract you sign indicates you agree to their policies. Did I pay twice so my kids could be educated? Yes. But at least I knew how they were being educated and agreed to the school's policies.

    24. Re:Social Justice Warriors by quenda · · Score: 1

      We have the same stereotype where I live: poor, dumb, single-parent, welfare, expensive shoes and chunky gold necklace, drugs and crime.
      Except I'm not in America, and there are few blacks, so that whole description here is about social class and not tied to race. Not like in most of the US, anyway.

      It was a bit racist of the AC grandparent to make the connection, but I suppose it is hard to live where he is, without automatically associating class and race.

    25. Re:Social Justice Warriors by clovis · · Score: 1

      Smart, talented, hard-working people succeed, regardless of whether someone else cheats

      That's so astonishing ignorant of the real world it makes me embarrassed that I had replied to you.

    26. Re:Social Justice Warriors by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Who has the Casio F-91W?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    27. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In China to be rich you need two (2) apple watches for your dog.

    28. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I guess I know a lot of successful people and I also knew people who cheated. The cheating didn’t prevent the success. If you think the two things are mutually exclusive, then yeah, it's hard to have a conversation about unreality.

    29. Re:Social Justice Warriors by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > How to tell the difference between a "rich" kid and a "poor" kid:
      > A "rich" kid wears a $349 Apple Watch.
      > A "poor" kid wears a pair of $349 Nikes.

      I was poor when I was young. My parents had a saying ... "I'm too poor to buy knock off cheap stuff".

    30. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I'll go one further. "Rich kids" because they have an Apple Watch? Really? Now the definition between "rich" and "poor" is based on a $349 device?

      Pretty much. I'm not rich or poor, comfortably middle, and there is no way I'd buy my kids a $349 device! I wouldn't buy one myself, most expensive "goods"I've probably ever purchased for myself besides car/house is a $200 used kayak (would have been $1500 new), and a $220 smart phone.

      If you really think "$349" is "nothing" then you're rich, even if you don't know it. (or don't have kids so have plenty of disposable income)

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    31. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Duh! Forgot my computer of course which I put together for about $600... clearly more than the price of the watch.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    32. Re:Social Justice Warriors by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      It was a bit racist of the AC grandparent to make the connection, but I suppose it is hard to live where he is, without automatically associating class and race.

      I'm a little confused and feel like I'm missing a joke (probably a racist one that I don't want to know), or some pop culture reference.

      What exactly was it that was said that was racist? Is there some sort of stereotype that white people don't wear "sneakers". White people wear trainers too, always have, is this a new taboo? Is white people wearing "sneakers" considered cultural appropriation or something now. What the hell are white people supposed to wear when playing sports now if we're not supposed to wear trainers? Are white people supposed to play tennis in cowboy boots or something?

      This has all got just a little too absurd.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    33. Re: Social Justice Warriors by Camembert · · Score: 1

      I fully agree - you made a reasonable comment and got anymous coward bile in return.

    34. Re:Social Justice Warriors by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      It was a bit racist of the AC grandparent to make the connection, but I suppose it is hard to live where he is, without automatically associating class and race.

      I'm a little confused and feel like I'm missing a joke (probably a racist one that I don't want to know), or some pop culture reference.

      What exactly was it that was said that was racist? Is there some sort of stereotype that white people don't wear "sneakers". White people wear trainers too, always have, is this a new taboo? Is white people wearing "sneakers" considered cultural appropriation or something now. What the hell are white people supposed to wear when playing sports now if we're not supposed to wear trainers? Are white people supposed to play tennis in cowboy boots or something?

      This has all got just a little too absurd.

      Probably something to do with nike and that footballer guy and that believe in something campaign they did. That would be my guess anyway.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  3. Bad exam design ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Design the exams like university level exams, where a cheat (equation) sheet is allowed, but you actually need to understand the material to finish the exam in time. regurgitation based exams are stupid.

    1. Re:Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      What kind of equations did you use in History? There are plenty of subjects where that kind of test just isn't possible. Even in sciences (gross anatomy comes to mind, had lots of memorization in that one).

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re: Bad exam design ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      History -- make them write about why and how, not when, to prevent cheating.

    3. Re:Bad exam design ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What kind of equations did you use in History?

      LargeInequality = revolution

    4. Re:Bad exam design ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Most societies that trended towards extreme inequality collapsed within a few decades. French and Russian Revolutions are cases in point.

    5. Re:Bad exam design ... by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Fundamentally the issue here is not that students are cheating, but that tests are designed the same way there were 50 years ago, and are measuring the same kind of useless knowledge that lead to the problems we have in the 1970's.

      Take the Advanced Placement exams, from the college board. These are college level exams where you have all the knowledge in front of you, and you need to understand the application to get a high score. However, the test is ultimately measuring your ability to fill in the correct bubble so any rational person, if they can, is simply going to get a list of correct answer choices and fill them in. Yes, many tests have a written section so you must know something, but on many AP tests the written section is not the limiting factor.

      if you are not interested in rank and file, but knowledge, then there are a number of innovated ways that one can ask questions in a computer based exam that both give an somewhat individualized test to each student and can be graded automatically. The student can be given all the content, and can even be allowed to 'cheat' to find other content, but the cheating is not free. I costs time and points as the students will not be able to complete as many questions as the student that is familiar with the subject.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re: Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      When, where, and who can be important factors in history though.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    7. Re:Bad exam design ... by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my current exams, I let the students use all lecture slides and their own notes and their own summary of the lecture. Does not have any impact on results, but the students learn more because they revise the material better this way. One student even commented in the eval that he expected the lecture summary he did to be quite useful in the future. We are in the information age, even if many teachers and lecturers have not realized that. Restricting access to information too much, giving too little time, etc. are just very bad ways to increase exam difficulty. They are easy to do though, so they are a favorite of intellectually lazy teachers.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This.

      Seriously, if your test is about fact regurgitation that can easily be replaced by 5 seconds of google search, don't be surprised when people just do that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What were the events leading up to World War One, and why could a simple assassination of a heir to the throne start a world wide war?

      Trust me, I'll know exactly whether you know anything about it or whether you wikipedia'd it from your answer. And yes, this is probably the only one, or maybe one of two, questions for a one hour exam. Because to explain this all you HAVE to know European history of the 19th century (and basically write a summary of it), and you better know it well.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You think that the French Revolution led to a leftist government?

      So it's true what I get to hear about the school system? Are we really fucked beyond repair?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re: Bad exam design ... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Why did the Harappa disappear? How did the transition from stone to bronze occur?

    12. Re:Bad exam design ... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Most societies that trended towards extreme inequality collapsed within a few decades.

      Like Rome, Greece, the Ottomans, Chinese dynasties and the Japanese feudal system?

    13. Re:Bad exam design ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Erm, you throw around words you don't grasp.

      Stalin was a fascist just like Hitler ... ooops, has nothing to do with communism.
      The communists in Laos or Vietnam never committed any crimes, ooops, you did not know that?

      The emperor of China were fascists, ooops, you did not know that? After the revolution the winner of the civil war picked "communism". Why? Because the armies from democratic countries like the french from Lao and Vietnam or the british from Parkistan or along the coasts looted and plundered the country. How convincing for a nation that just had a civil war over a revolution to pick such a system ... why would anyone copy/pick the political system of an enemy he finally mastered to defeat?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:Bad exam design ... by ranton · · Score: 2

      What kind of equations did you use in History? There are plenty of subjects where that kind of test just isn't possible. Even in sciences (gross anatomy comes to mind, had lots of memorization in that one).

      Others have already pointed out there are much better ways to test knowledge of history than to ask what year Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

      It isn't always just poor test design. Often it is poor curriculum design too. If your history test only tests an amount of knowledge you can fit on a cheat sheet, you are only asking for cramming of information (into either their brain or cheat sheet). If you really care that much about memorization, and this is actually important enough information to know long term, test randomly on any material you have covered so far that semester. Don't give an opportunity to study/cram for tests, or an opportunity to build cheat sheets.

      The best college classes I had almost always had open book exams. If you needed to use the book extensively, you would never finish the test on time.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re: Bad exam design ... by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Important to remember? Not really.

      24 June 1812 – 14 December 1812, Russia, Napoleon?

      Who and where might be a minimum to look up the date, but are the exact numbers as important as the realities of continuing to invade Russia in winter, or what lessons other "determined leaders" might learn from not being able to reassess your goals in changing circumstances?

    16. Re:Bad exam design ... by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that teachers often are told that they can't assess like that, because students need a clear-cut answer. Because subjectively grading that might lead to bias, and it would be better to have a multiple choice test with well defined answers so that nobody can complain about unfair grading.

      If we could let teachers be professionals and hold them to high standards, without parental or student interference, that would really help. Unfortunately, we don't pay most public school teachers enough to get great ones, and a lot of administrators (and teachers themselves) aren't interested in fighting asshole parents who often are looking for As for their kid and are seeking any way to manipulate the system to get them.

      If your kid fails a multiple choice test, the best you can do is argue that the question was vague or the answer options were wrong. Both are fairly easy to counter-argue. If your kid fails a 1 hr essay on why the Maginot line was ineffective, you can attack that from all sorts of angles including bias on the part of the teacher, and them asking kids for something that doesn't have a well-defined answer. And parents (at least in the US) are insane enough that some will throw fits in the school or district office, and show up at school board meetings to shit on a teacher who didn't give their kid an A. And who will sue everyone even tangentially involved.

      This leads schools to dissuade this sort of very good exam writing in favor of cut-and-dried shit that would easily stand up in court. Yet another fantastic knock-on effect of the US legal system!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    17. Re:Bad exam design ... by novakyu · · Score: 1

      But that would require that teachers actually understand the subject. That is patently unfair and unreasonable!

    18. Re:Bad exam design ... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      And how do you grade 150 of those and stay within budget?

      In most Universities you use free labor from grad students, but that sort of cheat is not available to ordinary High Schools.

    19. Re:Bad exam design ... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Are you a teacher?

      If yes, please tell me which school district gives you a class size small enough that you can actually pull that shit off in a non-AP class.

    20. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One outside the US, where teaching still happens.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Bad exam design ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons why there was a move towards coursework instead of exams back in the 90s. Measure performance over a longer period of time, factoring in things like the student's willingness to learn and fill in gaps in their knowledge when required. Also helps prevent transient problems like illness causing life-long disadvantage or a culture of re-sits.

      The oft cited problem is that it's very easy to cheat on coursework, but there are ways to handle that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Bad exam design ... by fermion · · Score: 1

      It is also often very expensive to grade and can subject students to the cultural biases of the grader or instructor. This is why, for instance, more than one person grades the written part of the GRE and more grade it if there is more than one point difference. Expensive. The goal is to keep the efficiency and maximize the objectivity of the test while acknowledging that cheating occurs.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    23. Re: Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Sorry, invading who? Russia is a "where" so try again, with no who, what, when, or where, just why.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    24. Re:Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      OK, explain that, without a who, what, when, or where. Love to see it. After all, no memorizing facts!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    25. Re:Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      OK, explain the start of WWI, without any of those pesky who, what, when, and where facts we burden students to remember. Please.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    26. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What do you mean without who, what, when or where? You are of course allowed to present facts, after all you're expected to explain your conclusions, but simply rattling down facts won't do.

      I don't want a cooking recipe, I want the finished cake!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      But you shouldn't force students to memorize facts like who, what, when where, per the OP's premise. My point is those facts are important to the bigger picture. History isn't physics. One size for teaching doesn't fit all subjects.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    28. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Whether the Prussian-Franco-War was in 1870/71 or a decade earlier or later doesn't matter in its effect on the two nations and their animosities, which were one of the reasons why the pacts at the wake of WW1 were the way they were. Why was England allied with France, which was a colonial rival? Why was Russia not allied with Prussia, despite the familiar ties between the ruling houses there and Bismark's near-pathological fear of a two front war? Worse, why was Russia allied with France AND England, two of the nations it was at war with over the Crimea only a few decades earlier? Why the alliance between Prussia and Austria-Hungary, two countries that were bitter rivals over the supremacy in Germany? What made Italy (or Piedmont-Sardinia, if you want to nitpick) switch sides? How did the US get dragged into it later, and how did one Roosevelt's foreign policy before WW1 affect another Roosevelt's headaches with his attempt to go to WW2?

      NONE of these things require you to know a single date. Yes, you'd have to have a general knowledge of events, but guess what, that's what I'm looking for: The ability to put events into perspective and see how they affect each other.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Bad exam design ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Not just dates. Places. People. FACTS. There are a lot of FACTS required to understand and communicate the why. You cannot do one without the other.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    30. Re:Bad exam design ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I want you to know MORE than mere places, people and dates. I want you to UNDERSTAND what they mean. Without understanding what it entails, it means jack shit that both Maria Therese of Austria and Frederick II of Prussia came to power in 1740. Hell, without understanding where the House Hanover (which is probably better known as the House of Stuart) has its origin the participation of the French in the independence war of the US makes no sense.

      People and moreover countries do things for a reason. They don't act randomly, and if we don't teach those reasons to our kids, some conspiracy nut will gladly fill the void, as we can so easily see everywhere today.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. racked up more than 115,000 views by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Well, that is the idea, no? The content is hardly controversial.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  5. I cheated on my metaphysics exam by Potor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I looked into the soul of the girl beside me. (Woody Allen)

  6. nothing new by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    I was in high school 30 years ago and I cheated during an exam by wearing a long-sleeve shirt and passing the wire of an ear bud in there. Then I listened to my home-made "audio book" of Canadian history on my crappy Candle portable cassette player.
    I got real good at pressing the buttons quietly!

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  7. Trim but flunked by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I tried to use a Fitbit to cheat, but having to move my legs gave it away.

  8. Apple Watch != "rich" by slasher999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An Apple Watch may not be cheap, but having one hardly makes anyone rich. We really have a strange way of measuring wealth in this country.

    1. Re:Apple Watch != "rich" by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      An Apple Watch may not be cheap, but having one hardly makes anyone rich.

      Not being rich generally makes a person not have an Apple Watch, though -- because an Apple Watch is the kind of frivolous purchase people make only when they have extra money to burn.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Apple Watch != "rich" by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The "poor" kids know that they can only compete on actual merit, and they have more to lose if they cheat. The "rich" kids will just coast along using whatever means they fancy, while their fathers take care of their future careers.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Apple Watch != "rich" by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      There's a world of difference between the definitions certain people use for "poor" in order to rag on the "rich" and the actual *poor* who can't afford food or clothing.

      In the UK, what most people seem to define as "poor" seems to include a lot of people who have large screen TVs, decent smartphones, smoke a pack a day, drink to excess etc.

      Which is why I take articles such as these with a huge dose of salt.

    4. Re:Apple Watch != "rich" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      An Apple Watch may not be cheap, but having one hardly makes anyone rich. We really have a strange way of measuring wealth in this country.

      Is an Apple watch someone people buy on their own? I've never seen an Apple watch that wasn't paired with a top of the line smartphone.

  9. You are testing wrong by aepervius · · Score: 1

    A good test is not for rote knowledge, it will test your understanding of the material. In fact in the uni we were left all physic books we wanted, we were asked to form a reasoning over the question given, formulate an answer, and apply what we could to form a conclusion based on the presented points - you would be surprised on how many people fell through and could not answer porperly. Basically asking you if you remember what equation X,Y,Z looks like and spit out the correct response, is stupid, rote knowledge does not help. And this is not solely related to STEM, in history/geo/philo/art there is a lot which can be done on understanding material rather than rote knowledge. Rote knowledge anyway is best replaced/fulfilled by by computer system. What is better is to show you can make research, understand the material, and explain it back. And as such an apple watch should NOT help - if you were testing for the correct thing. If you are testing for rote knowledge, then a well trained monkey can help.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  10. Re:what to make some money? by pete6677 · · Score: 1

    FCC won't even give prisons authority to operate signal blockers. Good luck ever getting it for schools. Next movie theaters would want it, then owners of snobby restaurants. FCC does not want to open that pandora's box.

  11. Re:Thats alright by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aluminum is nothing compared to Wifi waves and GMOs! Fortunately Himalayan salt candles and kombucha can mitigate the effects when used rectally.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  12. Um... you can buy an Apple watch for $99 bucks by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    if you buy last gen.

    Then again maybe it's only the rich kids with connections that get away with it. There's not a teacher alive who doesn't spot every cheat device you can think of. Even the drunk ones (they just don't particularly care)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um... you can buy an Apple watch for $99 bucks by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 1

      I used to buy $0.99 plastic watches from the drug store as a kid. Too many times I would smash the watch against something and the liquid would dribble out of the cracked LCD. When I worked in construction for a few years, cement dust jammed the buttons. That wasn't a problem until the next daylight savings time change.

  13. "hate" by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    "students were thanking me [in the comments], and teachers were hating on me"

    You know, it is possible for someone to disagree with you without being a "hater".

  14. "European" accent? by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really? A "European" accent?

    Can they mean "speaks Spanish like a Spaniard rather than a Mexican/Puerto Rican/American/etc," or "speaks English with a Spanish, rather than Mexican/etc accent."

    Or perhaps it means they are unable to distinguish between the accents of the Spanish, Greeks, Italians, French, Germans, Poles, Finns, Swedes or British, let alone the regions thereof? (other European countries are available)

    Whatever they mean, it adds nothing to the actual story and serves only to demonstrate the laziness and ignorance of this "journalist," and the ineptitude of the editorial oversight processes of this "publication."

    Sorry, but this sort of thing really pisses me off - if copy like this came across my desk (OK, so it wouldn't actually, but you know what I mean), words would be had... probably starting with "bollocks."

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:"European" accent? by YuppieScum · · Score: 1

      Methinks someone is confusing politics and geography...

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    2. Re:"European" accent? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I could comment, but I don't like the Godwin Law.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  15. Smaller class sizes by wickerprints · · Score: 1

    It's all too predictable that most comments are focusing on the "rich" versus "poor" debate, which completely sidesteps the real issue of the lack of quality education in American K-12 schools.

    This is why smaller class sizes are important, not because smaller classes are easier to manage in the classroom, but because they enable instructors to actually devise and grade homework and tests that aren't easy to cheat. I see the comments that call for such tests, but fail to appreciate that in a high school environment, a single teacher could have well over 200 students, with no TAs. Imagine having to grade 200 exams on top of a full classroom schedule. Each assignment is a mountain of work to grade, especially if carefully designed to test understanding. And then to craft them so that they are different for each class, and sometimes different forms within a class.... A university professor has the benefit of graders, TAs, a teaching schedule that is more relaxed, and more mature students with fewer behavioral problems that require parent-teacher interaction.

    I don't fucking care about whether Apple Watches are a sign of social class, or the political subtext such a statement might imply for the reader. The fact that we have cheating facilitated by technology is nothing new. The point is that teachers in America are expected to impart valuable critical thinking and reasoning skills to the next generation while being paid paltry salaries compared to far less stressful and time-consuming jobs in the private sector, while getting blamed by everyone from politicians and parents--and the students themselves. Meanwhile, class sizes continue to grow because of fiscal mismanagement and corruption, and lack of investment in education. Americans like to talk about how important education is, but when it comes down to spending taxpayer money, they'd rather build missiles and walls because fear sells shit to an uneducated and easily deceived public. So is it any wonder that we are in this situation? Who the fuck cares about whether a kid having an Apple Watch means they're rich. I care that a cheating student is in all likelihood going to grow up to be yet another irresponsible, uneducated, entitled, egocentric American whose corporate overlords can manipulate at will. Downvote me all you want. Call me a troll. I don't fucking care anymore.

  16. The problem is the test by DalM · · Score: 1

    If your "test" can be beat by a kid wearing an Apple watch, then your test sucks and is just a waste of everyone's time. There are plenty of ways to assess student growth that can't be beat by an Apple watch (or answer sheet in your sock, or what ever)

    1. Re:The problem is the test by DalM · · Score: 1

      I taught chemistry and physics for 2 years in Dallas ISD while working on my masters. I made lots and lots of assessments, none of which could have been beaten by an Apple watch.

  17. Re:Bad school by gweihir · · Score: 1

    No communication devices, no computing devices. The exam must be your work.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  18. Cheating isn't new - solutions exist. by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was university back in the late 70s. Kids would program their calculators with the formulas. Teaching assistants would walk around and reset i.e. wipe the memory on everybody's calculator before the exam started. Most professors allowed students to bring a single 8 1/2 x 11 cheat sheet to the exams. The point of the exam wasn't to find out if you could memorize the formulas, it was to find out if you knew how to apply them.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    1. Re:Cheating isn't new - solutions exist. by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      _Late_ 70s. I had a TI-59, they came out in 1977. The HP-41C came out about 2 years later.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  19. Watches are banned at my university by DogDude · · Score: 2

    At the university I attend (US, top tier research, public school), watches are already banned from the testing centers. I guess it's been a thing for a little while. I was wondering why the heck watches were banned from the testing centers. I couldn't think of a way to cheat with regular watches.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Watches are banned at my university by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Probably afriad someone would make a spy camera on one and photograph the exam to sell to others.

    2. Re:Watches are banned at my university by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      At the university I attend (US, top tier research, public school), [...] I was wondering why the heck watches were banned from the testing centers. I couldn't think of a way to cheat with regular watches.

      Heh, how did you end up at a top-tier university?

    3. Re:Watches are banned at my university by houghi · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  20. Re:what to make some money? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I learned that it's better to beg forgiveness than to ask for permission. Your Apple watch doesn't work? Gee, no idea why, but you can find out after the test. Here, I put a big one up in front of the class so you know how much time you have left, after all that's what you need it for, right?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. You're assuming the purpose is journalism by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're assuming the purpose of TFA is investigative journalism. To bring an important issue to the public's attention.

    It's not. The purpose is to generate more page loads and thus more advertising revenue. So if inflammatory insinuations - like singling out kids who wear an Apple Watch, or speak with a "Europeant" accent - gets you all in a huff to where you click on TFA, then it's done its job. It's one of the reasons I'm not that critical of comments here from people who haven't read TFA. So many of articles are click-bait that I won't fault someone for using a too-stringent anti-click-bait filter and not reading TFA.

  22. Re:Kohath thinks cheating is a virtue, shoot him d by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I'm not an authoritarian or a totalitarian, nor am I jealous of others' success, so I’m not in favor of ruining children's lives or otherwise harming people to maintain some vain illusion of control or exclusivity.

    If a kid wants to cheat, why is that any of your business? Because you're on the hunt for people to victimize to bolster your ego? How is that a good thing?

  23. Cheated with a TI84 Plus SE too by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Ran 3rd part math and science during the SAT, ACT, and on every math and physics test.

    If you know where to look, exam mode hacks abound. Doing this helped me bolster my math scores on my application to Penn. Sure some diversity applicant was denied, but who really cares anyway.

    Non story.

  24. Get off my lawn by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Feh. When I took the PSAT, one of the proctors who knew I was the only kid in class with a calculator watch made sure to tell me to take the watch off in front of the whole class.

  25. Re:what to make some money? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    You might mean jammers, rather than blockers.

  26. Re:Thats alright by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    Have you ever been hit in the head with an aluminum baseball bat? Don't tell me aluminum isn't dangerous.

  27. Re:Thats alright by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Many times!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  28. Since when is a 20 year old a 'kid'? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    ...and we wonder why they live at home until they're 30...

    --
    Loading...
  29. Re:Thats alright by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Fortunately Himalayan salt candles and kombucha can mitigate the effects when used rectally.

    I'm assuming that one is not to use any lube then as that would dissolve the salt candle.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  30. Re:Thats alright by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    If you need lube then you haven't been properly irrigating your bowels.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  31. The best Cheat Sheets by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I witnessed both of these in college. Cheat sheets were allowed (actuarial math courses), a lot of time textbooks (student versus clock).

    The two "allowed" best tweaks to the "single page" cheat sheet were:
    1. Printing at 3PT font on both sides and bringing a magnifying glass.
    2. The winner - printed on dot matrix paper which he claimed was a single sheet since it was continuous. He did well on the test.

    Myself, I relied on an HP-48SX and infrared data transfer with other students in the classroom (needed to aim them at each other but the teachers had no idea this was possible). It was way ahead of it's time with regards to what it could do (1991). Some of the ideas we came up with were a better education than the classes (wrote memorization versus creativity).

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  32. Testing for understanding by euxneks · · Score: 1

    When are we going to start recognizing that people have access to the largest repository of human knowledge in all of history and start trying to test for understanding of material instead of regurgitating knowledge? At work I have access to the internet. It helps me make decisions and develop solutions. Why are we denying children that? The exams I had to take when I was younger was literally just regurgitating information. Rote memorization doesn't make for a very good understanding of material.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni