Slashdot Mirror


The World's Biggest Spice Company is Using AI To Find New Flavors (cnn.com)

After 130 years, it can be hard to come up with new flavors, so the world's largest spice company is becoming the latest food producer to turn to artificial intelligence for help. From a report: McCormick -- the maker of Old Bay and other seasonings, spices and condiments -- hopes the technology can help it tantalize taste buds. It worked with IBM Research to build an AI system trained on decades worth of data about spices and flavors to come up with new flavor combinations. The Baltimore, Maryland-based company plans to bring its first batch of AI-assisted products to market later this year. The line of seasoning mixes, called One, for making one-dish meals, includes flavors such as Tuscan Chicken and Bourbon Pork Tenderloin. Hamed Faridi, McCormick's chief science officer, told CNN Business that using AI cuts down product development time, and that the company plans to use the technology to help develop all new products by the end of 2021.

138 comments

  1. Slurm? by Zorro · · Score: 1

    It's Highly Addictive!

    1. Re:Slurm? by technosaurus · · Score: 2

      It's Highly Addictive!

      FYI Slurm is a fictional soft drink in the Futurama multiverse. It is popular and highly addictive.

    2. Re:Slurm? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Strange . . . with AI I thought of robots, and thought that AI's favourite flavour would be:

      Bender's Shiny Metal Ass

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Slurm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lighten up francis

    4. Re:Slurm? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it was a pariody of Surge from Coca Cola. A popular drink during the late 1990's with a high caffeine and sugar amount, meant to exceed Mountain Due.
      It was rather addictive to the EXTREME!!!!!!11!! culture of the time.
      Man the 1990's was such a miserable era, when I take off my nostalgia glasses.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Slurm? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      FYI Slurm is a fictional soft drink in the Futurama multiverse. It is popular and highly addictive.

      And it comes out of a giant worm heinie.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  2. Duck++ Salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's this thing called Duck Salt .. maybe IBM will suggest Turducken Salt

  3. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by sheramil · · Score: 1

    How are we even supposed to read slashdot when the poorly coded advertising banner covers 75% of the screen?

    Ublock origin.

    And anyway, how does the AI know what shredded wheat tastes like? Maybe it tastes like chicken.

  4. The spices must flow! by xleeko · · Score: 4, Funny

    AI though?!? Really, a company that deals in spice should know the Butlerian prohibition on thinking machines.

    1. Re:The spices must flow! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      He who controls the spice controls the universe.
      If you control the Universe who cares on what the Butlerians point of view is.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:The spices must flow! by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      How long until they name a cinnamon-y spice with psychoactive effects "melange"?

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:The spices must flow! by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AI though?!? Really, a company that deals in spice should know the Butlerian prohibition on thinking machines.

      Thinking machines, what do such machines really do? They increase the number of things we can do without thinking. Things we do without thinking — there's the real danger.

      -- Leto Atreides II, God Emperor God Emperor of Dune

    4. Re:The spices must flow! by xleeko · · Score: 1

      “what I fear is the extraordinary rapidity with which they are becoming something very different to what they are at present. No class of beings have in any time past made so rapid a movement forward. Should not that movement be jealously watched, and checked while we can still check it? And is it not necessary for this end to destroy the more advanced of the machines which are in use at present, though it is admitted that they are in themselves harmless?" -- Samuel Butler, Erewhon, 1872

    5. Re:The spices must flow! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      It's called buttery cinnamon cake laced with LSD.

      Frank Herbert was most likely eating them while watching Lawrence of Arabia and hallucinated himself the whole Dune universe. Note the uncanny resemblance between Dune and Lawrence of Arabia.

    6. Re:The spices must flow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could sell that as a super food. Concentration boosting Melange-C would be a top seller among a wide variety of people.

    7. Re:The spices must flow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Buddhist might have something to say on the things we do without thinking in the form of dependent origination. AI algorithms are somewhat ironically giving the machines abilities and faculties of doing things without thinking.

  5. Corporate America's way... by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Corporate America's way of admitting that they've run out of ideas.

    1. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Try our new AI Inspired flavors. Robots LOVE them! Is that a BUS?"

    2. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is why they need new ideas in the first place. This world is absolutely overflowing with wonderful foods and flavors, enough to keep a food enthusiast happy for an entire lifetime. We don't need more types of food or flavors. What we need is quality foods and flavors. That's where there's room for improvement.

      Of course, the reason is corporate growth. In today's age, a business can't be satisfied with stable, consistent profits. They need to grow to appease the shareholders.

    3. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      What they really will do is heavily engineer new combinations of existing flavors to make their products more addictive, but not in the dysfunctional way that drugs are addictive. McDonalds is a good example of this. Their products have a very unique flavor. A very engineered flavor*. It's convenient. It's cheap. It is an example of the corporate dystopia of food-like products. But it is not the only one.

      *see the Super Size Me documentary, the "artificial flavor" in strawberry shake is a list of 42 chemicals that would not sound nice if printed on the product ingredients list

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:Corporate America's way... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Corporate America's way of admitting that they've run out of ideas.

      Nonsense. It's corporate America's way of dick riding. It was blockchain, but now that bitcoin is being revealed to suck rocks, it's "AI". And when it's revealed that AI isn't AI, it will be something else. No spice company needs "AI" to come up with Tuscan Chicken or Bourbon Pork. Those are already well-established seasonings. A person selected them from a list, even if that list was somehow machine curated, and more humans were involved in the vetting approach — both working in the marketing department, and the people they placed in focus groups and whose opinions were used to determine which spices they'd put on shelves.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Corporate America's way... by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How many chemicals that 'would not sound nice...' do you suppose are in a strawberry? Way more than 42. Or are you one of those Food Babe reading dopes (since you reference Suprer Size Me I guess that could be) who believes that 'natural' molecules are different from 'artificial' molecules?

    6. Re:Corporate America's way... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Spice mixes are all at least half salt and cost more than their most expensive constituent spices.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Corporate America's way... by fermion · · Score: 1
      Not so much ideas, but people want cheaper spice. Most people, for instance, are happy with fake cinnamon which for all intents and purposes is the same as real cinnamon.

      So by making task specific spice combinations, and minimizing for costs, commodity spice companies such as this can offer value products.If you look at the ingredient, the real challenge for AI is figuring how much salt and pepper can be added to a spice pack and still have the consumer believes that it contains spices other than salt and pepper.

      Like how chicken place no longer advertisers secrete blend of spices, after researches discovered that they were just aded salt and pepper like you would at home

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’d rather be dysfunctionally addicted to a wholesome drug made from plants like marijuana than nicely addicted to the garbage that is McDonalds.

    9. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *see the Super Size Me documentary, the "artificial flavor" in strawberry shake is a list of 42 chemicals that would not sound nice if printed on the product ingredients list

      Potassium Phosphate is a man-made chemical, also an important medicine, created by mixing phosphoric acid with potassium carbonate.

      3-Methylbutane-1-yl is a naturally occurring chemical that gives bananas their flavor.

      Most of the "scary" sounding chemicals in ingredients list are the "natural" ones, as they are organic compounds and are rather complex.

    10. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’m guessing you don’t know much about nutritionalscience.

    11. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes indeed. There's nothing left to be discovered that hasn't already been. While we are at it, let's never change ANYTHING about our diets and roll back the last 200 years of culinary science. We could go even further if you wish and undiscover baking with yeast, or eliminate cooking altogether.

    12. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many chemicals that 'would not sound nice...' do you suppose are in a strawberry? Way more than 42. Or are you one of those Food Babe reading dopes (since you reference Suprer Size Me I guess that could be) who believes that 'natural' molecules are different from 'artificial' molecules?

      Exactly, pretty much no ingredient "sounds nice" when you list them all by their component compounds.

    13. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words, it's about finding a way to trick the customer. Not surprised at all.

    14. Re:Corporate America's way... by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garden strawberries contain the dimeric ellagitannin agrimoniin which is an isomer of sanguiin H-6. Other polyphenols present include flavonoids, such as anthocyanins, flavanols, flavonols and phenolic acids, such as hydroxybenzoic acid and hydroxycinnamic acid. Strawberries also contain fisetin and the achenes: ellagic acid, ellagic acid glycosides, and ellagitannins.

    16. Re:Corporate America's way... by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      no ingredient "sounds nice"

      I know, just listen to this one:

      hydroxylic acid

      Scary part is that its in almost everything you eat or drink! It has been directly tied to the death of many of people who consume too much or too little. It even effects animals with the same fatal consequences. But those greedy corporate overlords keep using it in everything!
      Read up on it: https://en.wikipedia.org

    17. Re:Corporate America's way... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      They're pics so I couldn't copy the text, https://www.businessinsider.co..., the scroll down a couple for Strawberries.

    18. Re:Corporate America's way... by Potor · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Spice mixtures are a con. Make them yourself from the constituent spices ...

    19. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't know what a Food Babe is. Yes, real strawberry is an organic molecule and made of cells (even if not living), long chain hydrocarbons, etc. How would natural and artificial molecules, of otherwise identical structure, be any different? In fact at some level what is 'artificial'? Are smartphones all natural because humans are a part of nature? But I digress . . .

      My point is that the 42 chemical artificial flavor is, as I said, heavily engineered. Not that it is bad for you to eat the flavor. But it has an addictive purpose in the brain to make you want to keep coming back for something that is less than a healthy way to eat. Not that I don't enjoy a McDonalds breakfast burrito. But I notice that the 'simple' ingredients (eggs, sausage, cheese, bits of red/green pepper) sure seem to taste astonishingly unique. And that was my point. Corporations won't invent new flavors (although you could say I just described inventing a new flavor). Instead corporations will engineer addictive flavors that you cannot get anywhere else. When you think of a McDonalds breakfast burrito you will remember that unique taste.

      The dystopia comes in because people find it less convenient, more expensive, and less flavorful to eat healthy.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    20. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Yes. I'd rather not be dysfunctionally addicted to anything that results in altering my behavior and way of life, especially if I would commit crimes in order to get my next fix. Now I don't think marijuana has that problem. But some other drugs do. My real point is that the dystopia of corporate food might 'addict' you in a way that doesn't make you a criminal, but does make you stop eating healthy for the sake of corporate profit. And believe me, they don't care what they do to your body over the long term.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    21. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing my point about corporate food 'addicting' people with unique flavors that might cause them to stop eating healthy for the sake of corporate profit.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    22. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see if you can answer a honest question:

      Given the choice between a hamburger and a hamburger containing 42 artificial ingredients, which would you choose and why?

    23. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom sounds nice.

    24. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that it is bad for you to eat

      But that's the problem. We don't know if it's bad to eat the 42 artificial ingredients, because they were only invented 10, 20, 30 years ago. But we do know one thing for sure: if you don't eat the artificial ingredients, then you don't have to worry about it. Actually, we do know another thing for sure: NONE of those artificial ingredients were put there for your benefit. They were all put there for one reason only: to make somebody else rich.

      And I thought slashdot was skeptical of profit motive. Apparently not when it comes to artificial ingredients.

    25. Re:Corporate America's way... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      So are you trying to claim that this food is actually addictive (physcially and mentally dependant on the product, unable to stop without adverse effects), or are you just complaining that they make food that tastes good so you want more? You have offered up no proof of the first, and the second is the goal of every cook and chef (and they really want to make the 'can't get it anywhere else' recipes).

    26. Re:Corporate America's way... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that McDonalds - and the like - are very much addictive in the dysfunctional way that drugs are addictive.

    27. Re:Corporate America's way... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      New spices and new tastes are where GMO technology is going. Currently, we're only using it to make growing produce easier for the farmer and getting it to us easier for the shipper. New tastes will open up and be embraced by a new generation of food-hacking hipsters.

    28. Re:Corporate America's way... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      a list of 42 chemicals that would not sound nice

      Gentlemen, I present to you the stupification of our population. These people should stop taking all forms of di-hydrogen monoxide (hydrogen is highly explosive isn't it!!!! woooo scaaaarrrrryyyyy) and maybe Darwin help our species out of this mess.

    29. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      I doubt it will ever be physically addictive. But even if it were, I don't think that would stop corporations from doing it. But they might engineer tastes that are very mentally addictive.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    30. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Not in the sense I'm thinking where people on certain drugs will do anything, commit crimes, etc in order to get their next fix. I don't think McDonalds has this effect. But I certainly believe that even if it did have this effect, that would not stop corporations from doing something this destructive.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    31. Re:Corporate America's way... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

      I would also point out that Soylent Green is made from all natural ingredients.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    32. Re:Corporate America's way... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      So we're back to 'it tastes good' but isn't healthy. Do you go to bakeries and accuse them of 'engineering food' to be 'addictive'? Do you complain when a chef at a nice restaurant prepares you a delicious meal that has 2500 calories? Or is it just plain old 'corporations...eeeeeeebil'?

    33. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "breakfast sandwich taste" is a collection of chemical compounds and flavor enhancers, eg: "Smoke flavouring" for ones containing sausage/bacon. It's not really engineered to be "addictive" in the way you might consider certain alkaloids or opioids.

      The real reason for these tweaks is for product consistency, where sandwich #1 and sandwich #10000000 effectively taste indistinguishable in spite of slight variations in the "real" ingredients (the egg, the actual sausage etc). That's what lures you back more than any specific chemical -- the promise of the same "experience"

    34. Re:Corporate America's way... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Some people at the spice shop downtown were trying to sell me "organic salt" one day. Yes, NaCl. She assured me that the regular Morton variety is processed with dangerous chemicals, etc. I laughed. It's mined, in case you're wondering.

    35. Re:Corporate America's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The best table salt is a mix of 37% mine salt and 63% sea salt.

    36. Re:Corporate America's way... by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      Who are you calling a dipswitch, you fucking capacitor?

    37. Re:Corporate America's way... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Ideas, and probably pants.

    38. Re:Corporate America's way... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Creten. You NEED pink Himalayan salt or you might as well use road rock salt.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. All aboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another company that got tricked by consultants to hop on the "AI" train. We all know that white people only need one type of seasoning and that is salt.

    1. Re:All aboard by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Some old white dudes like pepper and especially crushed red pepper (like the stuff you put on pizza).

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  7. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Ad blockers are fine, but HOST FILE blockers are better. I found a good one on the Internet. If you want to know more about it, let me know.

  8. Here's a free one from a real person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell this and people will buy it:
    2 tsp salt, 2 tsp garlic powder, 2 tsp dried basil, 2 tsp dried oregano, 1 tsp ground cinnamon, 1 tsp coarse black pepper, 1 tsp dried parsley, 1 tsp minced dried rosemary, 1 tsp dried marjoram, 1/2 tsp thyme, 1/2 tsp nutmeg

    If you're feeling feisty add another 1/2 tsp cinnamon. This is awesome on all meats and also amazing on french fries.

    1. Re: Here's a free one from a real person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add 10 tbsp of syrup.

    2. Re:Here's a free one from a real person by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      You basically combined Poultry Seasoning, Pumpkin Spice, and Italian Seasoning together.

    3. Re:Here's a free one from a real person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try it. You haven't really eaten beef until you've cooked it with a bit of cinnamon.

  9. My spice blend: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made a spice blend of (1/3) monosodium glutamate, (1/3) sodium chloride, and (1/3) white sugar, and sprinkle it on everything. A little bit goes a long way, though.

    1. Re: My spice blend: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the cyanide!

    2. Re:My spice blend: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to just use soy sauce. Same thing but in liquid form.

  10. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Preach it!

  11. Re:PUSSY! by DickBreath · · Score: 0

    There are other more appealing flavors.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  12. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    > Ublock origin.

    No. uMatrix.

    It offers much finer grained control for both black and white listing.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  13. The spice must flow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still waiting for melange to be discovered

  14. I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huacatay

  15. Re:PUSSY! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Says you...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know that might summon HIM

  17. Re:PUSSY! by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 0

    Or you can substitute mizithra cheese for the same flavor.

  18. AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taste is a very subjective thing. What you like, I may not, what you think tastes unique may be totally blah for me.

    Assuming you've worked out how to accurately get some electronic devices to "taste" something, how do you figure you are going to train some AI to come up with things that "taste" good to people?

    AI is good at a lot of things, but fishing for subjective evaluations of things is not one of them. AI can evaluate and decide things for which there is an objective way to measure what's right, some times it can even make such decisions on less than what seems to be enough information. But how can you decide AI has created something good that is judged by subjective tests like how it tastes? Maybe your time would be better spend in the kitchen trying stuff? Oh that's right, AI let's you fire those folks with the promise that it can do everything they do, only cheaper.

    If this goes too far and McCormick fires its test kitchen staff and army of tasters, it might be time to seriously consider shorting that stock.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Ksevio · · Score: 2

      Might be able to get some good options for humans to test though. If the AI knows A+B+C is good and B+C+D is good, it might suggest A+B+D. The human test subjects can try it and give feedback to the AI

    2. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI should be just fine for such tasks. With enough training and right network it can become much better than a human in predicting the working combinations for a particular geographic area. They even have the models of human taste system to guide them. The issue here is the localized training data. How McCormick is going to generate it? Hopefully not from the sales figures of previous products, but with the taste system model, "chef knowledge" and local recipes as a starting point.

      The another issue is the complexity of taste itself. I think there was about 200 compounds responsible of a mundane taste such as apple alone. If this AI system can narrow the search space to get a reasonable sized sample to test for the chefs and taste experts in McCormick, they have a winner in their hands already.

      I do agree that such system, if applied clumsily, would be basically a repository of human experience and would enable McCormick to pull back their investments in local talent eventually which could be bad for the company image in some markets and lead to stagnation.

    3. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Taste is a very subjective thing. What you like, I may not, what you think tastes unique may be totally blah for me.

      But AI might be good for finding things that taste good to *most* people, which is probably all a for-profit company cares about.

    4. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taste is a very subjective thing. What you like, I may not, what you think tastes unique may be totally blah for me.

      Well, put it this way ...

      The line of seasoning mixes, called One, for making one-dish meals, includes flavors such as Tuscan Chicken and Bourbon Pork Tenderloin.

      This isn't being developed or marketed to people who have either a refined palette, or could otherwise make something flavorful on their own.

      This is literally a busy mom weeknight meal, and in that capacity, I'm sure it's fine ... I totally get the busy mom thing as I still remember my own trying to come home after work and feed us (after having gotten up early enough to make our lunches before heading to work).

      If this goes too far and McCormick fires its test kitchen staff and army of tasters, it might be time to seriously consider shorting that stock.

      Honestly, it's the old expression "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."

      Your average consumer probably doesn't really have the palette to know the difference, and couldn't do much of the cooking on their own ... by the time you're talking about seasoning mixes for one dish meals, you're not really talking about impressing trained chefs, you're talking about busy people, or people learning to cook.

      Remember the target audience for such a thing, and remember for some people if they can make a one-pot "Bourbon Pork Tenderloin", they're probably ahead of the game in terms of having a home-cooked meal anyway.

      I still have no idea how an AI figures out flavors, but since I'll never buy the product, it doesn't much matter to me -- because I'm a fairly decent cook according to people I've fed.

      For someone, it's going to be the difference between takeout, something frozen, or this ... and this sounds like an overall better choice for them.

      I hate seeing people in the trap of eating garbage because they don't have the time or the cooking skills to do it on their own; because if you know how to cook you can make a lot more food for a fraction of the cost, and it will be higher quality food.

      Me, I regularly cook 12-16 servings of most anything I cook, dole it out into containers, and freeze it for lunches and easy meals later, because it's not much more work or cost to make 3x as much of something once you know how, you can triple a recipe for a tiny incremental cost. At any given time I'll have a bunch of servings of a bunch of different dishes in the freezer.

      For people who can't do that, this is a start.

    5. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Visarga · · Score: 1

      Google used AI to design cookies. It worked like this: your AI can generate recipes, you take 20 of them and put them in front of your employees, asking them to submit a rating every time they eat a cookie. These ratings are considered a 'reward signal' and used to train a reinforcement learning agent (like the ones that play games). The agent acts by inventing new recipes and learns by reinforcing the reward. So you could say that the AI needs a large committee of people to work as it's taste buds.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/0...

    6. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by bobbied · · Score: 1

      How is this AI?

      It just boils down to "try all possible combinations" and see what the results are. You may be using a computer to tabulate your results, but it's not AI, at least not anymore than Excel spreadsheets with graphing of your data is AI..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I built a hobby app a few years ago for scotch tasting. If you have people rate things they like using an N-dimensional scale (my taste profile mechanism had 8 characteristics) then you can programmatically do comparisons against a database of records to find likely matches based on the characteristics that you liked or didn't like. With enough individual user feedback it can easily get granular enough to provide personalized recommendations. The aggregated data of what people like and don't like can be used to predict whether new combinations will be popular or not.

      This is exactly what Netflix does with its recommendation engine for shows. Why would flavors be any different? The hardest part is building a system for defining and capturing flavors and there's several classification systems out there already that you can use to bootstrap that.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    8. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it work as spectacularly poorly as the Netflix recommendation engine?

    9. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know the difference between science fiction AI and what the industry calls AI today.

      It's still very valuable. Computers can keep track of many more things at once than humans and make this sort of analysis much easier. But most Machine Learning processes, even deep learning and 'neural networks', are fairly basic in principle.

    10. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are stupid. The robot's output will always be evaluated by humans. Good tasting output will be the shit that goes to market. Gods you are a simpleton.

    11. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And this is what passes as AI in the press? What you describe isn't AI, but something else. Oh the uneducated masses..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    12. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taste is a very subjective thing. What you like, I may not, what you think tastes unique may be totally blah for me.

      Assuming you've worked out how to accurately get some electronic devices to "taste" something, how do you figure you are going to train some AI to come up with things that "taste" good to people?

      It's a good thing that's not what they're doing then. They're taking the steps where people have made many iterations of minute changes to ingredients to form a spice (or combination of spices) that ended up being profitable and cross referencing that with various trends (fluctuating cost of ingredients, changing consumer preferences, etc) to create efficiencies in finding new formulas.

      They still need tasters. They still need people who know when the algorithm (yes, it's not "real AI" - *gasp*) suggested something dumb. They've had people trying stuff in the kitchen for decades. It's expensive and slow. They're trying to shrink the problem space.

      I know you're reacting to typical corporate shenanigans, but in this particular case after reading the article you come across as a luddite.

    13. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      If you wrap a neural network around it for machine learning, yes.

      The grandparent post was complaining that taste was too subjective to compute. Which is false. Whether or not everything billed as "AI" meets the various definitions of AI is an entirely different discussion.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    14. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... consider shorting that stock.

      I see what you did there.

    15. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose you train that neural net? Neural nets require training and that requires real world data, and quite a bit of it. They don't just work out of the box... You cannot just slap a neural net into some process, expect to get meaningful results without training, and call it AI.

      Just because somebody imagines using AI like tools for automating some decision making, does not mean that it works like you imagine or that it's now magically AI based solution to the problem. AI is only a solution to specific kinds of problems, and specific AI tools are only usable in specific situations.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    16. Re:AI for subjective truth? Bad idea by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      You obviously have people taste things and provide data entry, then refine with more tasting inputs as the system progresses. The whole premise of a neural network is that the more iterations you provide the better it gets. Stop being intentionally obtuse.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  19. tastes like chads by swschrad · · Score: 1

    with a trace of IBM Model 10 cardpunch ribbon on the high note

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  20. Hamed Faridi by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    The first time I read that name I parsed it as one of the new flavors.

  21. Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your website is fucking unusable with these god damn giant ad banners that stay having over half the screen as you scroll down. Kindly die.

    Love,
    Everyone Ever

  22. Re: Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to block your ads for ad blockers, faggot.

  23. Re:PUSSY! by BringsApples · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah? What's that, DickBreath?

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  24. Do nothing by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    Nothing is the most under-rated approach in so many cases. This is most certainly one where not bothering would yield the benefits of the same end result, and the savings of all the time and effort needed to carry out the project.

    1. Re: Do nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey shush. Thatâ(TM)s like the best kept secret in all of creation

  25. You don't need new AI, just go to India by guacamole · · Score: 1

    I am shocked that McCormick has to go so low that they announce to use AI. How about you start selling Garam Masala, Tea Masala, or MSG? How about saffron?

    1. Re:You don't need new AI, just go to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about you start selling Garam Masala, Tea Masala, or MSG? How about saffron?

      Garam Masala MSG saffron

  26. A better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better solution is to add crack cocaine to everything, after first taste nobody would care about flavor and would always come back for more.

    1. Re:A better solution... by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      You get a promotion ! Your a real mover in the spice industry !

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    2. Re:A better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's essentially what sugar is for. They add it to everything because it's highly addictive and completely legal.

    3. Re:A better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Coffee is for closers.

  27. It's common knowledge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That he who controls the spice controls the universe

  28. McCormick is way overpriced by BlackOverflow · · Score: 1

    Now that Badia is all over I will never buy McCormick again. Their prices are outrageous compared to Badia!

  29. The line of seasoning mixes, called One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will soon be supplanted by Google's line of AI seasoning mixes called Zero, tempting flavor combinations developed from scratch with no prior knowledge of what humans think they like.

  30. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    Well so far all the AI did was take things that exist and make spices out of them. It probably was set up with "this tastes most like this, and little like this" All together this spice has these qualities. And basically the AI helps make the recipe for the seasoning.

  31. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UBlock's dead in Chrome. API changes limit it to only 30k possibles to block https://www.bleepingcomputer.c... and there are a lot more than 30,000 bad sites to block out there.

  32. Incredibly wasteful by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would you buy an entire bottle of “Tuscan Chicken” or “Bourbon Pork Tenderloin” seasoning? 90% of it’s probably going to end up in the garbage, unused.

    I realize spices keep a long time, but how frequently are you going to make one particular recipe?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  33. Please God by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    Just don't let it come up with "Pumpkin Spice", that makes everything taste like Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Latte!

    As a challenge though I dare it to come up with something better than bacon, "Super Bacon" flavor! But sadly I'm expecting something like "Saddle Wood", a cross between eating an old horse saddle and a chunk of wood.

    But as long as it doesn't achieve self consciousness and enslave us all I might just count it as a win.

  34. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... hire a chef.

  35. Sandworms? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    They should try Spice instead of spice.

  36. AI will decide that we become cannibals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A study using robot/digital taste machinery already found that humans taste like bacon.

    What could be better than bacon?

    https://www.wired.com/2006/11/robot-identifie/

  37. Should I give a rip? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Just what the world needs: A new fucking flavor.

    1. Re:Should I give a rip? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I notice that the "new flavors" described in terms of existing real food... I have a brilliant idea, we'll keep cooking real food at my house. Cheaper than processed crap too, despite what some ignorant folk here who don't cook think when they wail how the poor have to eat processed crap because it's cheaper. false. wrong.

  38. Quote what would've been the BEATLES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & @ 2:55 on the YouTube player https://www.youtube.com/watch?... "Climb on in & we'll go for a ride in the SkkYYYYyyyy... JET!" -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?... & that's what it's like "w/ the WIND IN YOUR HAIR from a 1,000 places!"

    * :)

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    APK

    P.S.=> Accept NO substitute - ESPECIALLY since Google's out to KILL browser addons in UBlock https://www.bleepingcomputer.c... + other adblockers (that are EASILY DETECTED & BLOCKED by webmasters & native browser methods + addons are slower usermode & operate AFTER hosts making the redundant + they use more resources vs. NATIVE hosts as part of the IP stack in faster kernelmode)... apk

  39. Blue eyes are once again in fashion by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    A single scientist in a McCormick labcoat, on the floor, his back against a door. The only light is from a flashlight. He's scared, fumbling with the camera.

    I'm sorry. (panting) I'm sorry ok? I didn't know what we dealing with. We were just trying to make some money. It was a good excuse to try out TensorFlow. (slams the floor. A jar of paprika rolls into the scene) ...It was supposed to be a good career move.... (SOBS) ...But it's too late for that. The world is going to change. And I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. I don't know how to fix it.

    All I know now is that the spice must flow!

  40. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS: when the OP talked about the flavor of pussy, they didn't mean licking a cat's arse, just fyi, they were referring to female (human) genitals

    We all know about your mum's pussy. Taste like piss and vinegar. You could have taken a piss elsewhere and your mum could have douche with something other than vinegar.

  41. Favorite New Flavor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite new spice is Cinnamon Teryaki Basil.

  42. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer is getting his Windows 10 certification in two months!

  43. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahhh the old reimer word salad complete with crammar mistakes

    you haven't lost your touch

  44. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chris ain't here man

  45. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are so easily trolled. ROFL!

  46. Who TF says it's the only oldest company in the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are millions of spice companies in India.. Since the spice trade...

  47. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you misspoke and said msca instead of mcsa
    wipe the shit off your dollar store glasses when reading your prompter dummy

  48. Re:Slashdot Homepage Ads Cover EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ad blockers are fine, but HOST FILE blockers are better. I found a good one on the Internet. If you want to know more about it, let me know.

    ublock origin is FAR superior to hosts files. Hosts files just block DNS queries. This can cause pages to break. Likewise, blocking hosts files just causes blank white space in pages where the ad would have loaded. Ublock origin not only blocks those DNS queries, but it refactors pages to remove that whitespace. It also blocks scripts that are hosted at respected, not blocked at the hosts file, dns's from doing things like tracking your browsing.

    Host file blocking is a poor man's adblocker.

  49. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing funnier than a 30 year old stoner joke from a guy who has never smoked weed.

  50. Re:PUSSY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good work chris. I look forward to hearing fresh excuses in 3 months!

  51. Sounds like the Nutrimatic Drink Dispenser by djago · · Score: 0

    Arthur Dent would love to tell about the flavor of tea to this AI.