Slashdot Mirror


Reddit, Banned In China, Is Reportedly Set To Land $150 Million Investment From a Chinese Censorship Powerhouse (gizmodo.com)

Reddit is about to get a huge new round of investment of up to $300 million. As Gizmodo points out, "the first $150 million is reportedly expected to come from the Chinese tech giant Tencent, the first ever Asian technology company to pass a $500 billion market value." The investment is complicated since Reddit is banned in China via the Great Firewall of China. Also, "Tencent is not merely a resident of China's internet -- the company is one of the most important architects of the Great Firewall," reports Gizmodo. "It's an interesting source of cash for a Silicon Valley company whose product is essentially speech." From the report: Tencent is, at great cost and ultimately for great profit, literally reinventing censorship in China. The Great Firewall was not built by the Communist Party in Beijing, it's built by the tech giants all around China. This opaque but clearly powerful relationship between the $500 billion company and the Chinese government raises interesting and unanswered questions about Tencent's forays into the West, including questions about Reddit's future.

The pending Chinese investment in Reddit, a social media company with relatively little Chinese-language community, is a richer twist on that old tale, and it's a part of Tencent's expanding global investment strategy. The Chinese company owns about 12 percent of Snap, for instance, even though Snapchat is banned in China. Tencent also owns a piece of the chat app Discord even though, you guessed it, Discord is blocked in China. If Tencent does kick in $150 million on a nearly $3 billion valuation for Reddit, as TechCrunch reports, it will be interesting if we ever find out exactly what it means. What kind of influence and position, if any, will Tencent gain at Reddit? Neither company responded to Gizmodo's questions.

45 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Mystery solved by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least I don't have to wonder anymore why I was perma-banned for posting "I think Xi Jinping may be overrated."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Mystery solved by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Well, at least I don't have to wonder anymore why I was perma-banned for posting "I think Xi Jinping may be overrated."

      Since Slashdot is not banned or censored in China, you have already posted that.

    2. Re: Mystery solved by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Rule 34 is an Internet rule that states that Internet pornography exists concerning every conceivable topic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    3. Re:Mystery solved by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot is not yet a chinese propaganda machine.

      Correct. It would need to support Unicode for that.

  2. Not good optics for Reddit by MikeRT · · Score: 2

    There is no way they're going to prove to anyone now that any controversial moderation decision wasn't forced on them by outside pressure now.

    1. Re:Not good optics for Reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There wasn't any way to prove BEFORE that any controversial moderation decision wasn't forced on them by outside pressure. You have to rely on whistleblowers to tell you.

    2. Re:Not good optics for Reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no way they're going to prove to anyone now that any controversial moderation decision wasn't forced on them by outside pressure now.

      It has already been shown that a relatively small group runs the moderation of both Reddit and Wikipedia and they have some disturbing beliefs and relationships that no one is mentioning because the MSM is not reporting on it, so it's up to places like /pol/ and other fringe outlets to do the research and reporting.

      To get on topic, a certain Tom Edwards was Microsoft's head of geopolitical strategy which meant censoring products for the Chinese market. He joined the transgender cult and changed his name to Kate Edwards, then became head of the IGDA and was coordinating with the San Diego FBI to shut down alleged "harassment" of Zoe Quinn in July 2014. Note the date. When the Gamergate scandal broke a month later, Reddit was one of the forums that Shut Down Everything. Four years later, the now heavily censored Reddit attracts $150 million in Chinese investment.

    3. Re:Not good optics for Reddit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is no way they're going to prove to anyone now that any controversial moderation decision wasn't forced on them by outside pressure now.

      Every decision is already the subject of wild conspiracy theories and cries of "SJW!" so the probably don't even care. At this point it can't really get any worse than it already is.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:Trump need to ban reddit till they pay a tariff by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Trump need to ban reddit till they pay a tariff!

    Maybe Trump can haggle with them a bit, and get China to build him his wall . . . ?

    That would take the pressure off the Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and then they could kiss and make up, and get on with their proper government business.

    But, alas, something makes me think we'll have a stalemate for the next two years, like the World War I trench battles, where no one wins, and everybody loses.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  4. Re:Las Vegas Rules by youngone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which is why if the new Chinese investors try to impose their censorship stuff on Reddit, they will lose their money as all the users bugger off to somewhere else.
    I'm sure they're not stupid, and are well aware of that too.

  5. Reddit needs help censoring Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those pesky patriots over at the_donald have to be kept off the frontpage at all costs! Luckily, the Chinese Communist Party is here to help!

    1. Re:Reddit needs help censoring Republicans by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well the apparent overnight flip of /r/politics from pro-bernie to pro-hillary(and if you're not with her, you're banned) is what drove a lot of people to the_donald. A lot of social and political subs have become full-on echo chambers the last few years, in the canada and canadapolitics subs are complete garbage.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  6. Re:American Companies by youngone · · Score: 1

    So you're OK with the US government dictating what US companies do then?
    Hmm, sounds suspiciously like you're a communist. Also confused about who makes the rules in your country.

  7. Re:Trump need to ban reddit till they pay a tariff by balbeir · · Score: 1
    Great idea!

    Maybe he can get a firewall from Huawei and deploy it on the southern border.

    Hey, it's some kind of wall, no. Better than a beaded curtain.

  8. Re:Different forms of censorship by youngone · · Score: 1, Informative

    Show me where Alex Jones has equal access.

    Why would anyone give Alex Jones equal access? They guy's an incoherent arsehole, and no civilised person would want to be associated with him.
    If he wanted access to any platform I ran, I'd ban him too, because Alex Jones brings with him a whole bunch of unpleasantness, and he just spoils everything for the rest of us.

  9. Nah, they'll fit right in by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tencent will fit right in at Reddit. Reddit isn't some kind of free speech platform. In fact, they censor daily and with great enthusiasm. The top admin was caught red-handed altering people's posts in the database. The problem with youtube, google, facebook, twitter, reddit... we took this open platform of the internet where anyone could do anything and we gave control over our behavior to a few big players because their products were slick and had a lot of cash invested in them. We centralized... and in centralizing we gave control over this free wheeling space of the internet to a handful of companies.

    And now we're seeing the problem with that. The same problem we had before with the handful of media companies that provided our TV, Newspapers, Radio, etc...The freedom is gone if you centralize.

    Wikileaks released emails which showed that Shareblue/Correct the Record was astroturfing many subs on Reddit.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Nah, they'll fit right in by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [consumers] gave control over our behavior to a few big players because their products were slick and had a lot of cash invested in them. We centralized... and in centralizing we gave control over...

      It's not necessarily slick-ness, it's the Network Effect: everybody goes "there" because everybody else goes "there".

      Perhaps with some adjustments, such as summaries/titles and basic markup for quoting/linking etc., Usenet could be resurrected as a primary discussion and announcement source.

    2. Re:Nah, they'll fit right in by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Those same wikileaks also demonstrated that Russia was actively working and spreading outright lies in The_Donald and other highly conservative Reddits. White Nationalists, racists, and sexists and most Republicans have tried to turn the site into their own collective version of shit. Their Subreddits outright ban alternative thoughts. It's quite disgusting what conservatives are doing in the name of being able to hold onto racist/sexist/rapist beliefs.

    3. Re:Nah, they'll fit right in by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      we took this open platform of the internet where anyone could do anything and we gave control over our behavior to a few big players

      Bollocks.

      Even if you hosted your own site on your dial-up connection back in the day, your ISP would eventually cut you off. Usenet is still around but the server operator would just ban you if you started abusing it. When was this golden age you speak of?

      Things are actually much better these days. We have TOR and hidden sites, we have platforms like YouTube that give people immense reach on a very effective medium, and we have 4chan if you really want to go nuts. All free.

      The people moaning about being banned are mostly just complaining about not being free publicity or getting paid. It's not enough that they can post their messages or host a .onion site, they want to be promoted on YouTube, suck up that ad revenue, be on the prime-time platforms.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  10. Reddit is already a lost cause by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's nearly impossible to have any sort of civil discussion there since anything posted either:

    1) Gets removed by the moderators because your opinion doesn't align with their own
    or
    2) You just get banned by the moderators because your opinion doesn't align with their own

    The moderators basically control the microphone. I liken it to folks calling in to some talk show host thinking they're going to argue with the
    host on the air when they can silence you with the push of a button.

    IF the moderators don't get you, the users themselves will down vote into oblivion any opinion that clashes with the echo chamber group think.

    1. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      If you believe that then why do you bother to post on Slashdot? It's not that much different here...

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    2. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by coastwalker · · Score: 2

      Curious, I have never even seen a post removed from r/UK. Apparently our politics has not yet been infiltrated by trolls as yours undoubtedly has.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    3. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      I originally included how much Slashdot has gone downhill over the years devolving to the point of where it stands today. However, since bitching about Slashdot on an article discussing Reddit seemed pointless, I decided to remove that portion of my reply.

      But since you mentioned it. . . . . :D

      Slashdot certainly has a troll problem without a doubt, but it pales in comparison to what Reddit is.

      Reddit makes Slashdot look downright classy. :|

      Though, I will admit, the thought did cross my mind of deleting my account here on Slashdot the same day I wiped it on Reddit. The reason being is you have to wade through too much shit-posting ( usually Trump or APK ) to find any meaningful replies on any given topic on Slashdot anymore.

      It has become a rather sad shadow of its former self I think.

    4. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by mccalli · · Score: 2

      Undoing moderation in this thread to respond to this.

      Yes, the troll problem is an issue and it frustrates me that I use so many mod points clearing up rubbish rather than promoting good comments. It's endless, and some of it is copy/paste and I think there's a case to be made for sysadmin-level filtering of a lot of it. There's a slippery slope argument to have about that, but it's one I would sit on the "ok so long as we keep an eye it" side of things.

      I've been coming to Slashdot for a long time - this is my second account, after losing/forgetting contact details for resetting the password on my other. The quality of discussion here was why I kept coming back. Slashdot was and still can be a place to discuss the implications of things, rather than just the specific detail. It used to be seen as an influential venue on tech culture, and sadly is less so now but the core discussions are still quite good.

      The trouble right now is the massive troll spam issue. Obsessive vendettas and an inability to understand that not every sentence of every subject ever is to do with US politics. I do my best when I get mod points, and I'm sure the other moderators do as well. But it's just a bit wearing having to clean things up rather than promote good conversation.

    5. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's just KotakuInAction though, most of Reddit is fine. Or at least no worse than the bulletin board systems and forums of old. Even Usenet had moderated groups.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      /r/the_donald is also notorious for that, but yes, I agree, there are plenty of Reddit forums that are 99% open, more or less "Say what you want unless you're very obviously trolling."

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Reddit is already a lost cause by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I would agree, there seem to be so many people who are motivated by despising a particular poster than actually contributing.
      Additionally, many seem to feel posting AC makes being a jerk a viable thing.

  11. Re:American Companies by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    No, you have it exactly backwards: "So you're OK with US companies dictating exactly what the US government does then?"

    In the real world the US government is the agent of big business and cartels, not the other way around.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  12. So what? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I never gave a fuck about Reddit and this doesn't change my position

  13. Re:American Companies by youngone · · Score: 1

    The A/C above would like to turn that on it's head though. Clearly a communist.

  14. Re:Las Vegas Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully. China is increasingly growing more powerful, influential, and interconnected with the rest of the world. Love or hate the Communist Party of China and their authoritarianism and human rights stance, they're a major player on the world stage. It would be chilling if a country as increasingly powerful as China was able to get the IP information of those posting comments anti-CPC comments, and could then trace those comments to individuals. I do not trust Chinese investment in social media platforms.

  15. $3 billion valuation by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Only in Silicon Valley is borrowing money to get you into more debt, considered raising your "valuation". No website is worth $3B. It is a website.

  16. Re:Las Vegas Rules by coastwalker · · Score: 2

    Amusingly Facebook sells you to the highest bidder so the Chinese own anyone they want already. Reddit forums are probably of use to the Chinese with appropriate oversight. Everyone seems to forget that the great firewall of china does not mean they are technologically backward. They adopt things like mobile payment faster than the rest of us.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  17. subreddits getting banned all the time by hitchhacker · · Score: 1

    See r/reclassified for a list of the latest banned/quarantined subreddits. 10 in the past 24 hours.

  18. So no by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Tiananmen square?
    No saying Taiwanis real China?
    No cartoon bear jokes?
    No comments on term limits?
    Dont mention Tibet?
    Animal Farm, 1984
    Dont disagree with Reddit.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:So no by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Seems like the place to be in china is out.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  19. Re:Trump need to ban reddit till they pay a tariff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because the democrats are the party of the illegals?

  20. optics by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    How is this bad optics for Reddit? They are already notorious for their heavy handed censorship of anything that challenges the official Corporate Progressive narrative.

    Maybe Tencent made their investment so they could get their hands on some of Reddit's advanced censorship technology?

  21. Re: Different forms of censorship by astrofurter · · Score: 2

    "Why would anyone give Alex Jones equal access? They guy's an incoherent arsehole, and no civilised person would want to be associated with him."

    No doubt Chinese censorship apologists would hurl similar insults at anyone challenging their Party's official narrative.

  22. Reddit hasn't been about speech in awhile by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    It's about censorship, filtering news and control of the narrative.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  23. Re:Different forms of censorship by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    Prove me wrong. Show me where Alex Jones has equal access.

    His own website. Twitter and all that before he got himself banned for being a massive knob. Any other website he might care to sign up to. Before he gets banned for being a knob that is.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  24. Re: Different forms of censorship by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    Calling the target of censorship "thoroughly unpleasant" does not make the suppression of his speech any less censorious.

    Fwiw, I had always assumed that anyone who had looked at Mr Jones' website for me than five seconds could tell he was a loon. That still doesn't make it okay for his (inexplicably threatened) political opponents to censor his speech.

    If anything, the coordinated effort by multiple patastate companies to stifle his speech has lent Mr Jones a level of credibility he never before enjoyed. Streisand effect and all that...

  25. Re: Different forms of censorship by youngone · · Score: 1

    It's not censorship if you (and everyone else) refuse to engage with someone because they're an arsehole.
    That's what's known as consequences. Parents teach their children about it before they go to school.

  26. Re: Different forms of censorship by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    It's _totally_ censorship if I run a publishing platform that's _open to the public_, then decide to boot you off because I disagree with your politics.

    But Corporate Progressive nazi assholes don't really give a fuck about freedom of speech. They want all dissent silenced! 'Cuz "arseholes".

  27. Re: Different forms of censorship by youngone · · Score: 1

    Corporate Progressive nazi assholes...

    Aaaand there we go.