Slashdot Mirror
Ex-Cons Create 'Instagram For Prisons,' and Wardens Are Fine With That (bloomberg.com)
Bloomberg's Olivia Carville writes about three apps that are offering a cheaper way for families to connect with incarcerated loved ones. Here's an excerpt from her report: Pigeonly and its ilk have hit on a communication model -- a necessarily inelegant one -- that meets inmates' desire for a more tangible connection while serving the social-media habits of their loved ones. One of the apps, Flikshop, has been affectionately dubbed the "Instagram for prisons." It's an imperfect metaphor perhaps, but the app is the closest thing to the social network in prison, and Flikshop postcards are pinned up on cell walls across the U.S. Beyond giving prisoners an easier, cheaper and more fulfilling way to communicate, the men who started these apps also want to make inmates less likely to re-offend because they see there's a life to be lived on the outside. Decades of research show that recidivism rates fall when prisoners are in regular contact with family. Criminal justice advocacy groups and rehabilitation non-profits have already started using the apps to make the prison population aware of their services.
Frederick Hutson, 34, started Pigeonly, Inc. in 2013, fresh from a five-year stint in federal prison for drug trafficking. "I saw first-hand how difficult and expensive it was to stay in touch," Hutson says. "I also saw how much of an impact that made on the person behind bars. I would see the guys that had the financial means to stay in touch and when they left prison I would hear that they were doing well, but those who didn't have the support network on the outside -- I'd see them coming back in." Pigeonly -- named for the pigeon post services of wartime fame -- wants to become a bridge between those who live in a digital world and those who are imprisoned in an analog one. Customers subscribe to the app for a monthly fee, ranging from $7.99 to $19.99, in order to send photos and messages and have access to cheaper online phone rates. Pigeonly has 20 full-time staff, half of whom were previously incarcerated themselves. Every day, they send up to 4,000 mail orders into county, state and federal penitentiaries across the country.
Frederick Hutson, 34, started Pigeonly, Inc. in 2013, fresh from a five-year stint in federal prison for drug trafficking. "I saw first-hand how difficult and expensive it was to stay in touch," Hutson says. "I also saw how much of an impact that made on the person behind bars. I would see the guys that had the financial means to stay in touch and when they left prison I would hear that they were doing well, but those who didn't have the support network on the outside -- I'd see them coming back in." Pigeonly -- named for the pigeon post services of wartime fame -- wants to become a bridge between those who live in a digital world and those who are imprisoned in an analog one. Customers subscribe to the app for a monthly fee, ranging from $7.99 to $19.99, in order to send photos and messages and have access to cheaper online phone rates. Pigeonly has 20 full-time staff, half of whom were previously incarcerated themselves. Every day, they send up to 4,000 mail orders into county, state and federal penitentiaries across the country.
Its prison not meant to be a holiday resort!
You should look at Scandinavian 5-star "prisons". Safety tip: before you look them up, take your blood pressure meds.
If you read the /. snippet, it says that increased communication helps these people NOT to land back in prison. This effort should be applauded.
I had a number of family members in jail that were sent to facilities around the US. I had looked into Pigeonly because of their telephone service rates. Calling inmates is ridiculous - either on their books or calling collect - it's a ransom to call long-distance. What I ended up doing instead was signing up for 3 different google voice numbers in the area codes of the prisons my family were all in and had them call me at the local numbers. While still a lot more than a traditional call, it was astronomically cheaper than long-distance, and cheaper than the plans offered by Pigeonly.
The federal prisons system has email access, and was the cheapest way for all of us to stay in touch. Snail-mail was bad. Sorting and scanning at the prisons is kind of a crap shoot. Sometimes letters wouldn't arrive until 4-6 weeks after we'd sent them. Sometimes they'd show up in 3 days. I think a few showed up 3-4 months latter. The intake office rejects all kinds of letters for arbitrary reasons. They sent back a picture we included with a letter, that my 3 year old had drawn for her uncle. Their note said it was returned because it was an "unsigned card".
My mom's prison had access to video chat. $20 for 15 minutes I think. We tried it 2 times. The latency and lag was really bad. Kind of felt like I was video chatting on an old 320x240 from the early 00s. The apps didn't have any kind of noise canceling / mute function with the mic so unless we chatted on headphones you start an infinite feedback loop. I tried once on computer and once on an iPhone. Because we were only doing it some my mom could see her grandkid, and this 3 year old wasn't into headphones we gave up the video chatting too.
Good on him for helping out people not savvy enough to setup VOIP lines in local area codes and making letter writing easier. Keeping up with people in prison is hard and expensive.
A prison systems job is or at least should be to reduce damage caused by criminals to regular society. There are three mechanisms through which it can do that.
1. Deterrent, most people don't want to be locked up, hopefully the threat of being locked up keeps most people in-line.
2. Rehabilitation. convincing prisoners that they have options other than a life of crime, that they have friends and family they would rather be with than in prison.
3. Removal, if the prisoner is locked up and communications are restricted then it's harder for them to commit crimes against anyone other than the other prisoners and the wardens.
A good prison system IMO balances the factors, not so cushy that it fails to be a deterrent, but not so isolating from society that prisoners become totally dysfunctional and feel they have no choice but to turn back to crime.
note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
One of the apps, Flikshop, has been affectionately dubbed the "Instagram for prisons."
Filk music, in the person of its writers, performers, and fans, says "Ouch!"
For those who aren't already aware of it, Filk Music is science-fiction/fantasy inspired folk music. "Folk songs for Folk who Ain't Even Been Yet", to quote the title of one album.
(I actually wrote a couple, and got paid for recording one. Little enough, though, that I kept the check as a souvenir rather than cashing it.)
I don't know how long it's been around, but it was already long-standing when I went to my first worldcon - Torcon II in 1973.
Naming a prison conferencing application "Filkshop" will likely make new generations of people think it has something to do with crime and convicts when they first encounter it. That's likely to be annoying.
Even if you DO think people who perpetrate such artistic abominations should be thrown in jail. B-)
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
1) "Customers subscribe to the app for a monthly fee, ranging from $7.99 to $19.99"
IOW, a digital inmate-phone ripoff.
Yes the phone systems are a rip off in prison. It sucks ass.
2) The issue with inmate communication is directing criminal activities from inside jails.
All they need are pre-arrange code words to change the positive (if obscenely priced)
communications with family into an ability to run gangs from behind bars.
This can be done with any form of communication. So you have one option, stop all communication with the outside world. I can tell you that is not a good option. Yes I have been to prison unfortunately.
I'm glad someone is working on this but the truth is that the problem is entirely a regulatory/administrative/profit problem. We have no shortage of cheap easy to use communications devices that could be used to let families stay in contact with prisoners for little cost.
Unfortunately, because these are people who have made mistakes (some serious some not) we don't feel like we have to care about their welfare or avoid gouging them to extra money. I mean if you had any doubt that we just aren't concerned about the welfare of prisoners just take a look at the statistics on prison rape. Given that we shrug about statistics that would be sending us off to fight the good fight if it was anywhere but prison it's not surprising we screw prisoners on telecommunications as well.
Hell, I think we should probably let minimum security prisoners have cell phones. The excess danger is quite minimal (inmates can already get messages out and using a prison registered cell phone would be the best way to get caught) while the benefits to the inmates both emotionally and legally (interact with lawyers) are substantial.
I don't doubt there will be tradeoffs and abuses but I think the model in the nordic prisons of treating the low security inmates with respect and decency and counting on that being met in kind (helping allow better transitions back to society etc..) is very very compelling. We are a different country so I don't know if it will work to have the guards and prisoners dressed in the same outfits as it does for the Danes (swedes?!??) but I see no reason we can't let minimum security prisoners have cell phones.
If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:
Also known as "justice" or "fairness."
Many prisoners and their advocates believe they should be able to inflict costs, up to the taking of a victim's life, and incur no cost for it. However, as we compensate farmer for his costs, by paying him for his produce, rather than simply taking the fruits of his labor without compensation, many believe that an offender who maliciously harms others for some personal benefit should somehow compensate the victim.
Unfortunately, the costs incurred on the victim are often quite large, and the offender cannot pay in money. In the case of a stolen life, there is no more victim to compensate. Thus, out of a sense of shared sacrifice and fairness, a cost is imposed on the offender commensurate to the cost he imposed on the victim. If the cost can also deter/prevent the offender from harming others in the future, that is good for people who come into contact with the offender.
Like all the murderers
Someone loves this guy: https://www.thelocal.de/201505...
rapists
I sure as fuck hope someone loves these two guys, because they need something: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/...
robbers
If only someone had loved this woman who so clearly deserved to be in jail: https://www.wsbtv.com/news/tre...
violent criminals
It feels very likely that this chap's family loves him: https://www.foxnews.com/us/con...
criminals don't do those sorts of things, do they
Yes. Most criminals are productive members of society. Shit, you're a criminal too - good luck getting through the week without breaking the law.
so they can be looked after like little babies
Yeah, American prisons are all about loving care, afternoon naps and breast feeding.
make our neighbourhoods shitholes
The people living in a neighbourhood make it good or bad. You live in yours; guess who makes it a shithole.
A factual statement, "people were relieved to have an an excuse not to spend alot of money", coupled with his social analysis.
Newsflash: people in prison often come from poor families.
Cheap storage VM.
So we treat prisoners like animals in the hopes that they won't do the same to others!
We are not a smart society.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
Indeed, the Norwegian prison system focuses on rehabilitation and has incredibly low recidivism rates. So much so, that at some point they had prisons that were empty, if I'm remembering correctly. https://www.businessinsider.co...
There is certainly the question of culture—Norway is not the USA—but a capitalist system where many of the prisons are privately owned and have contracts for minimum occupancy with the state certainly only benefits shareholders and not society at large. Recidivism rates in the USA are high, and that's just how prison owners like it. Think about that for a moment: there's someone that owns a prison and honestly goes to sleep at night hoping people commit crimes, and implicitly, that there are many victims of crime. It's monstrous.