Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Newest Macs Seem To Have a Serious Audio Bug (thurrott.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Apple's new Mac products might have a serious audio glitch for professional users. The company's newest Mac products with its T2 security chip suffer from a software-related bug that leads to issues with audio performance. The issue seemingly affects devices with the T2 chip -- that includes the iMac Pro, Mac Mini 2018, MacBook Air 2018, and MacBook Pro 2018. Although Apple's T2 chip is designed to offer improved security, it's affecting users in the pro audio industry.

As CDM reports, there is a bug in macOS that leads to dropouts and glitches in audio whenever a Mac automatically updates its system clock through the system time daemon. Users have been reporting the issue across a bunch of different pro audio forums for months, and it seems like the issue has never been acknowledged by Cupertino. The issue here is pretty simple to understand, as explained by a DJ software developer on Reddit: whenever the system time daemon automatically updates the system time, it somehow sends a 'pause-audio-engine' message to the kernel, leading to dropouts and glitches in audio.

144 comments

  1. Prepare for Appelenation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T2 ....a sophisticated chip, that has come back though time to change the audio of several unlucky users!

  2. How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get all the reports of Apple bugs here but never Dell bugs?

    1. Re:How come by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Informative

      We get all the reports of Apple bugs here but never Dell bugs?

      Because Dell doesn't talk shit like "you're holding it wrong", and because Dell hasn't tried to build a reputation as making computers which are easier to use than everyone else's. Also, because Dell seems to have less gigantic fuckups than Apple, per unit shipped.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because Dell doesn't talk shit like "you're holding it wrong",

      No, they just build it wrong instead. Greatly preferable.

    3. Re: How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple aren't the epitome of building it wrong...

    4. Re:How come by thevirtualcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember Dell's "It just works." and "Dell vs the rest of the PC industry" ad campaigns?

      Oh, wait. That was Apple.

      It's the same reason you don't generally see car companies doing ad campaigns around their competitor's recall mishaps. They all know "there but for the grace go I." Apple had to learn that lesson the hard way. A decade later and they're still living down that hubris.

    5. Re:How come by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy fix: remove the headphone jack. Users will stop complaining about audio quality; problem solved!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol your mom built it wrong

    7. Re:How come by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. I've been using dell for personal and professional equipment for more than a decade. I've never had any problems with dell support. On the professional side, shit just works, and when it doesn't they send someone out to make it work. Personal, I've had to send back a laptop for service. It was "yes sir, we'll get this fixed for you" and that was it. It was fixed and back in my hands in a week.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    8. Re:How come by ilsaloving · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The way things are going, it seems like their hubris hasn't changed, and is in fact preventing them from learning from their mistakes.

      I'm imagining the Simpsons Principal Skinner meme, but instead he says, "Am I out of touch? No, it's the customers who are wrong!"
      Actually, let's do that right now.

      https://i.imgflip.com/2u30ai.j...

    9. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get all the reports of Apple bugs here but never Dell bugs?

      Oh, there are Dell bugs sometimes. If such a bug bothers you, there are 23 other Dell PCs to choose from. Some have different audio hw, useful in cases like this. Send the bad one back, get a different product.

      And if you have too much trouble with Dell, there are a few hundred other manufacturers to choose from.

      Dell bugs aren't exiting - avoiding them is too easy. You don't get stuck with a Dell bug.

    10. Re: How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, they never talk shit:

      https://www.businessinsider.com/michael-dell-1997-apple-quote-2013-2

    11. Re: How come by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Like the average businessinsider article, that article is garbage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're just hearing it wrong.

  3. The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

    Because the T2 chip blocks access to the internal SSD when the security level is set to off, making it impractical to install Linux or another OS when Apple starts supporting that laptop, that is a deal killer for me

    Disclaimer: I could be wrong, but I've not found anything that states one can both turn security off, and install Linux on the internal SSD on a T2 equipped Mac. You can turn security off and use external flash drive media, but the internal drive is inaccessible. It would be nice if Apple allowed the SSD to work, and provided support for Microsoft compliant shims, so one could have Secure UEFI boot to RedHat, Ubuntu, or other operating systems and have some faith that the kernel hasn't been tampered with.

    Between this, and the other Mac issues (keyboard, audio), looks like my next MacBook Pro may be a Dell Latitude model, which in some ways is a better MBP than a MBP, if only because it supports USB-C, and USB-A without needing a dock or dongles.

    1. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by kb7oeb · · Score: 2

      My understanding is the problem is there is no linux driver for the apple SSD. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh...

    2. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Simply having the storage soldered to the board is too much of a problem for me. M.2 drives don't take up that much space, and are a much better solution to soldering the storage directly to the board. Even if you plan to never use anything other than MacOS, having the storage soldered to the board is a completely ridiculous idea with no other reason than to prevent people from upgrading/fixing the machine by themselves in the future.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by hey! · · Score: 0

      This is just UEFI secure boot being turned on by default. Turn it off and you can boot any unsigned kernel you want, it's in Apple's support database (google HT208330).

      It's not different from what you go through with other UEFI firmware, except Apple's branding obscures that fact.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heresy!
      Apple never makes a decision without considering all of the ways it would affect the user experience.
      If the wizards at One Infinite Loop think the user's experience can be improved by soldering everything directly to the motherboard and sealing the case with twenty severn micro-hex-head retrograde threaded plastic screws that strip out when you breath on them, then you can bet the TRUE Apple user will like it.
      The problem is, sir, you are no TRUE Apple User!

      And that's how you deal with people who don't like your product -- S. Jobs.

    5. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/ridiculous/brilliant

      The point is to make sure that you stay inside the walled garden.

    6. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      it's so apple can change $800 to upgrade from 128GB to 1TB vs $250 for 1TB m.2 card.

    7. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      My understanding is the problem is there is no linux driver for the apple SSD. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh...

      Why would you buy over priced apple hardware just to install linux on it? There are any number of ryzen, or even intel, based laptops for half the price with better or greater performance. An these laptops tend to be a lot more penguin friendly. No weird apple shit to deal with.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    8. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      That's the reason? After all of the years of abuse? The over priced fragile hardware? The proprietary protocols and connectors? The constant build quality issues? You decide the T2 chip is finally the one that breaks the camel's back. They have almost always had disdain for their customers. I can accept that at one point they may have made some of the best laptops but that was a long time ago and reliability and serviceability have never been great. How can you use free software but run it on hardware that's the opposite?

    9. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Between this, and the other Mac issues (keyboard, audio), looks like my next MacBook Pro may be a Dell Latitude model.

      So apart from the thermal throttling, the flat cable display problems, the keyboard with a lack of travel and dust rendering keys unusable, audio lag/glitches, T2 locking down the internal SSD and the low-res blurry webcam of the 2018 MacBook Air, everything is okay!

      Sent from my 2010 Mac mini, which I upgraded myself.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't see the SSD and if you try and probe the SSD the computer powers off

    11. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      But, then how will they get you to buy an entirely new machine when all you want to do is increase or storage? Or get you to grossly over-spend on your initial purchase do you don't have to worry about it later?

      How dare you put your needs ahead of Apple's bottom line?

    12. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you buy over priced apple hardware just to install linux on it?

      Retina screens.

    13. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When apple thinks that your macbook pro is obsolete you install linux on it

    14. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Retina screens.

      Has nothing to do with anything. Retina is just a buzz word for good display. My samsung 28" UHD has just as good color contrast as any thing apple put out. My 3+ year old Asus android tablet has a beautiful display. I have had iphone owners look at the amoled display on my Galaxy S8 and tell me they wished their iPhone looked that good.

      Retina display is nothing more than market hype.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    15. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they aren't to confident about the drive's encryption...

    16. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once upon a time... apple had good hardware, might not be the best but it was good and the build quality of their products was also good. People just liked them. And they were not always that over priced*. So, why don't you use _your_ computer they way _you_ want? I used a macbook air mid 2012 with arch linux for a while, admittedly it was given to me at work. Then I binned it for a AW 13R3.

      I could do my work in macOS as well as I trend to use multi-platform software, but _I_ just wanted linux.

      * With the discount for higher education staff or students it was actually competitive.

    17. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just in case -and I don't know if it applies here-, if you try to install linux in a laptop with the SSD set to RAID-0 in UEFI... for some reason linux cannot detect it. You have to put it in AHCI mode, install (make during installation a RAID-0 if you're so inclined to do so, then put it back in RAID-0 more in UEFI), and use.

      I'm not sure the Mac's recovery mode gives you control over that stuff. Never came across it.

    18. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, by that argument, why would argue allow Linux to boot by an UEFI shim?

      The point is it doesn't have to make sense to you. People own the computers, and if they want to install FreeDOS on it, they should be able to even if you think that's stupid.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    19. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Just to play devil's advocate here, it's not just about space. By soldering on the SSD and putting it behind as crypto chip, you complicate the job of, say, the police if they want to recover data from it.

      Suppose a flaw in the encryption existed that allowed you recover the key used by the encryption chip. Desoldering the SSD and putting it in a test rig won't stop the NSA, but it will sure slow down casual hackers.

      A lot of this architecture actually makes sense from a security standpoint. Biometric credentials stored in cleartext give me the heebie-jeebies. But as always the closed nature of this system makes other, less savory things possible, like locking out non-authorized repair shops.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by gozar · · Score: 1

      The proprietary protocols and connectors?

      The only proprietary connector used on a Mac in the last 15 years is the Magsafe connector. Every other port was a standard: USB-A, Ethernet, Firewire 400, Firewire 800, mini-VGA, mini-DVI, mini-displayport, Thunderbolt, USB-C.

      --
      What, me worry?
    21. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      If you're going to replace what may be the number one thing that sets Apple apart (the OS), then why would you pay more for hardware that is well behind the competition and a laptop that is designed to be hard to service/upgrade?
       
      Sure, it doesn't have to make sense to me, but I struggle to see how it could make sense to anyone.

    22. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      My Lenovo P71 with a 4K screen has 254 dpi - better than the 220 dpi of those Macbook retina displays. And it has built-in Pantone color correction/calibration so it's always color-perfect.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mo solder, Mo profits.

    24. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the added benefit of hauling around an extra 3+ pounds.

    25. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      Considering the last time I bought a mac was around 15 years ago yes. They have had a lot over the years.

    26. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by hey! · · Score: 1

      What's the number one thing to you is not necessarily the number one thing for other people.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    27. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there's also the little logo! Lots of people just want that. That's why people put it on their fucking cars, or on their dell laptops.

      I've had so many people ask me if they can put android on their iphones, and respond to "why don't you just sell it and buy an android phone" with "but I want an iphone!"

    28. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      If carrying a 7 pound laptop is a chore for you, I suggest you immediately seek medical attention and start working on improving your general health...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    29. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lenovo P71 is a luggable. Close to 9 pounds with a power brick, and half the battery life of a typical notebook computer.

    30. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you donâ(TM)t care about the display or trackpad.

      Used to be able say that of the keyboard too, but Apple fâ(TM)d that up in the most recent generation.

    31. Re:The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      it's not my number one, because i don't really care. My statement was that the OS is the main thing that distinguishes a Mac from anything else. Buying a sub par computer and removing that part just seems odd.

  4. It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a bug, it's a feature! Automatic digital watermarking for all your DRM pleasures.

    This message paid for by Disney Corporation.

    ---
    Sent from my pink eye phone.

    1. Re: It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      This message paid for by Limp Bizkit.

      ---
      Sent from my brown eye phone.

    2. Re: It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avast ye corporate stooges, arrrgh!!

      ---
      Sent from my one eye phone.

    3. Re: It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crapple employees can't call it a "bug" Or a "glitch" or a "malfunction" or they will be assassinated by the Order of the Apple

  5. difference by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All systems have bugs. The difference with Apple is that generally, the bugs get fixed and the hardware gets supported. As much as you hate their prices and controlled environment, can you say the same of other hardware manufacturers?

    1. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The difference with Apple is that generally, the bugs get fixed and the hardware gets supported.

      Yeah it only takes a couple years and a couple class-action lawsuits.

    2. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you said that with a strait face?

    3. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, s/he said that from their straitjacket. If they weren't visibly smiling, it would be a *straight* face.

    4. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that strait face is dire indeed.

    5. Re:difference by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I had a dell laptop got tits up on me. Dell sent a technician to my office with a brand new laptop. He pulled the drive out of my old one, and put it in the new one.

      Meanwhile the apple in another department died. It had to be taken down to the "genus" bar where one of the "geniuses" wanted to charge him a "copy" fee to move his shit from the old one to the new one. The hard ware was covered but the data transfer wasn't.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    6. Re:difference by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      All systems have bugs. The difference with Apple is that generally, the bugs get fixed and the hardware gets supported. As much as you hate their prices and controlled environment, can you say the same of other hardware manufacturers?

      Wow, interesting take. I'm trying to think about the last time the custom security chip and a time daemon update caused ASIO to stop working on my Windows boxes. Hmmmm. Can't seem to come up with it.

    7. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a moron.

    8. Re:difference by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Sounds like your business had a service agreement with Dell and didn't have one with Apple, so that's a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison and on a wholly unrelated topic from the subject of whether bugs get fixed, which was what the OP was talking about.

    9. Re:difference by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I bet to differ, I had a first gen macbook air, a 2500 dollar stinker never fixed.
      The system was overheating and crashing so apples fix was to simply toggle down the processor once it hits critical temp to a non usable state, this happened after 10 minutes pushing the system into an unusable crawl state.
      Then the hinges broke, this was fixed by a repair program after apple lost a class action suit (so no fix before they lost in court)
      Apple never admitted the heating problems, but silently made a bugfix revision half a year later and left the old customers standing in the rain without any upgrade option to the fixed version.

      My experience is Apple only gives in once they have been dragged to court and lost the case otherwise they try to weasel their wait out by sentences like "You are holding it wrong"

    10. Re:difference by LaminatorX · · Score: 1

      Used to be the case moreso than it is now. I've happily paid more for "Just Works" several times over the years, but they don't seem to be selling that any longer.

      In retrospect, needing to buy a 3rd party app to print from my iPad to the laser printer my iMac is sharing on the network was the first sign of trouble.

    11. Re:difference by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      We did. I was the one that set up the service agreement with them. Apple didn't have such agreement or didn't want to make one with us. Which is probably why there are far more Dell in the work place than Apples. Which is pretty stupid for Apple.

      So I find that Dell equipment is just as reliable as Apple, if not more. There are more Dell failures in the field simply because there are 10 Dells for every Apple. Give or take. Dell more than makes up for these failures by having a fair superior service system than Apple. I've never seen a apple "genius" leave the bar but I have talked to a number of dell technicians on site.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    12. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember back in 2009 or 2010 when Apple wouldn't fix a Java bug for a year that was fixed upstream and then just stopped redistributing Java as a response when someone called them on it? And Jobs had the whole "courage" style line, saying "Oracle does Java best". It was fixed upstream for a year. It's not hard for Oracle to be infinitely better at patching Java when Apple does nothing.

    13. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently typing this on a Sony laptop from 2009 running Windows 10 flawlessly, so I'm having a good laugh at this comment.

      Had a few 2006 computers install Win7/10 with almost zero issues (a network card didn't have drivers).

    14. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just some headlines in the news. In this case, they work out a fix fairly quickly. Look what happened with the macbook pro i9 throttling like hell and underperforming. That thing was sold to people until Dave (D2D) told to the whole internet to avoid that particular product.

    15. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, beat me to it :)

    16. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Cracked trackpad
      >Keys that just don't work
      >Bend devices
      >More bent devices
      >You're holding it wrong
      >Strain relief? Nah, that's not aesthetic. You'll learn to love your intermittent connections.
      >The ability to lose airpods constantly is a feature... for our investors.

      Apple is an awful company, and just because you can get a replacement for many thing under warranty (as all manufacturers do) doesn't mean the replacement will be designed any better. And if they can say the damage is "just" from normal wear, you bet your ass they will. Current Apple devices are a great example of designed to fail products as part of a planned obsolescence scheme. The last devices which were actually made well was the iPhone 5 line.

    17. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking liar. Generally speaking nothing happens and Apple denies everything until they get their asses sued.

    18. Re:difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference with Apple is that generally, the bugs get fixed and the hardware gets supported.

      Hahah! That used to be the case, but now Apple just deletes threads from the forums instead and refuses to fix simple design flaws like glued on rubber feet that fall off when your laptop gets hot. For a $5 part they want $110 to replace the bottom case. Sorry, but that isn't support that is robbery, and I am done with being robbed by the likes of Tim Cook.

    19. Re:difference by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I could go on a huge rant about all the problems I had with my previous Macs that Apple never acknowledged and never fixed. Audio not working at all, CD-ROMs disappearing after a system update, can't do a factory reset with the original install media, can't use any non-Apple display because the DVI-D port is not clocked to spec...

      But, nobody ever believes me 'cause I'm just a "hater". I don't bother anymore.

    20. Re:difference by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      can you say the same of other hardware manufacturers?

      Erm yes. Still have some very old and very working Dell laptops here. On the other hand you can't even install Linux on a fancy new Apple laptop, at least not on the internal drive.

  6. Audio system bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like a simple "bug" in their audio system. It's possible to speculate that the command might be sent intentionally as in updating the clock the audio system must be forced to re-sync in order to operate correctly. The fixes would then either involve providing an alternative sync method that would avoid drop-outs (an alternative clock source?) or some "real-time mode" that might disable the tweaks to the clock entirely.

    Can it actually be fixed or not? This is obviously very bad design lacking foresight but it would interest me greatly to know whether this is merely an engineering (implementation) blunder or a design fault that can never be corrected.

  7. Apple stopped being for professionals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a long time ago.

    They make consumer jewelry now.

    It's not stupid, given the bigger target group (of morons).
    It's just evil and harmful. (Because people are treated like morons *until they are*.)

    The thing that I'm wondering: Arent their target group users sometimes thinking "I want to *make* something today!" or "I want my life to have a purpose... a point!".
    Sure, consuming is fun and easy. Especially if you re being told what to want. But doesn't it get... you know... *boring*?

    1. Re:Apple stopped being for professionals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This emotion you describe; the sense of "being bored" is simply something those individuals are incapable of.

    2. Re:Apple stopped being for professionals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple users make lots of things. It's just that few of those things are computer related.

      I've known writers using their Macbooks to write up their stories and screenplays. I've seen live concerts running on Macbook Pros alongside the live instruments. I could go on, but the point is, none of these things have to do with the computer itself. The PC and Linux worlds more often focus on the computer AS a computer. Mac users in general don't give a fuck about the actual computer stuff, they just want to use it to accomplish their actual tasks.

      I think that's why a lot of the disconnect between the two factions. As there are mostly different goals on each side, they usually end up talking past each other without realizing it.

    3. Re: Apple stopped being for professionals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably do most of their mechanical and electrical CAD of Apple devices on PCs.

  8. better options by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Pro audio users have been abandoning the Apple platforms for years. You'll still find some trust fund EDM kiddies who use it, but this is a sector I pay attention to and a lot of people who cut their pro audio teeth on Macs are now using Windows machines instead. Linux will eventually get there, but now it's mainly a platform that pro audio users run as an adjunct to a main Windows DAW.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:better options by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, just about every DJs I have seen (in person and in pictures) have a MacBook proudly exposed on stage. Some use no computer at all, but I've yet to see a professional DJ with a Windows PC.
      They may be using Windows PCs behind the scenes but the Apple logo is still shown to millions of spectators.

    2. Re:better options by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      But it's not like you can't put an Apple logo sticker on any other brand of laptops.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:better options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is catching up with the pro audio crowd, but there is still a very big problem with proprietary drivers in a lot of the hardware. It takes a bit of extra work researching what to purchase, but it's worth it in the long run. M-Audio and Behringer hardware both tend to use the USB Audio Class Compliant spec, which the Linux kernel supports without any issues.

      As for a DAW, there's always Ardour, which is getting better and more featureful with every release. Reaper also has a Linux version if you're looking for something commercial. You can whip up some beats in Hydrogen, scratch some vinyl with Mixxx, mess around with hundreds of LADSPA plugins, do basic recording and cutting and editing with Audacity, there's pretty much a tool for everything. You can do all this with a real time kernel and a low-latency sound API, because fuck PulseAudio for professional work. JACK all the way.

      It's pretty fun seeing things progress, and while I'm sure these programs might not look and feel the same as a lot of Windows pro audio software, they're still capable of producing great music once you get to familiarize yourself with the tools and user interfaces.

      The biggest thing holding Linux pro audio back is simply that studios aren't using Linux and music schools aren't teaching it, so you're kind of on your own if you decide to make a challenge out of going 100% Linux-based like I have. It's still very rewarding and educational, but also kind of isolating. I do foresee larger, face-to-face communities of Linux musicians coming together, jamming, sharing notes and experiences, but that will more than likely happen later than sooner.

    4. Re:better options by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I don't know, just about every DJs I have seen (in person and in pictures) have a MacBook proudly exposed on stage.

      Yes, as I said, the EDM crowd still show off their MacBooks like gold chains on a rapper. But if you keep an eye out for the working DJs, you'll see Windows machines. And in the professional recording/production world, Windows machines have been taking over.

      It's a big change. I cut my teeth using Macs for music production. The advantages have been diminishing and Windows advantages have been increasing. I used to buy a new Mac Pro every other year for production, but that stopped five years ago and now the Mac version of my preferred DAW is markedly inferior to the Windows version.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:better options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a big part of this, the fact that real time response basically doesn't exist on a modern PC OS? It's be funny if some sound card/mixer/sound table maker just provided a bootable DVD or USB (keychain) Flash drive with optimized OS. Mac OSX supposedly worked well for this, but only Mac I have is PPC 'eMac' so no way to test this. I'm imaging the expressions on people's faces when it's a BSD boot disc because it was the easiest for them to license and modify. ^_^

    6. Re:better options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add my 2 cents,

      bitwig and traktion are also available in Linux.

    7. Re:better options by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Isn't a big part of this, the fact that real time response basically doesn't exist on a modern PC OS?

      There is absolutely no difference in latency, or "real time response" between a Windows PC and Mac. You have to dump some unnecessary processes and background shit, but you have to do that with a Mac, too. You really don't want your OS telling you that there are 5 updates available in the middle of a set or recording session.

      There hasn't been a technical reason to use Mac over PC for pro audio for a long time. The last thing that was keeping me with Macs was the Logic DAW, which is useful for certain things that are clumsy in other DAWs, like Pro-Tools, etc., but now the other DAWs have caught up.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. CLOCK_REALTIME vs. CLOCK_MONOTONIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bug really sounds like the developers did not realize the difference between what POSIX calls CLOCK_REALTIME and CLOCK_MONOTONIC.

  10. T2 chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, YOU are the enemy too!

  11. Are you sure about that? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because the T2 chip blocks access to the internal SSD when the security level is set to off,

    I thought you could disable secure boot on the Mac, which should let you install any OS you like on the internal SSD...

    I fully admit I've not tried that though so it could be there's some other aspect to that I did not know about. But this article sure makes it look like that setting has the effect of letting you boot into Linux on a T2 Mac.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Are you sure about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming Apple continues to support it that method should work once there are drivers such that the SSD is actually detectable by the installer.

    2. Re:Are you sure about that? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The grandparent did appear to address that, saying that if you turn it off, you can't access the SSD drive. My Googling confirms that, though there's some debate as to whether it's because of the security system, or because Linux lacks the drivers for the internal SSD drive. The latter seems unlikely given Apple uses mostly off the shelf stuff these days, but who knows?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Are you sure about that? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That article is correct, ... providing you have another SSD or an external drive. You need to disable secure boot to be able to boot from another drive or another OS, but in doing so the T2 chips locks down the internal SSD.

      At least that's the presumption. It could very well be that the drivers for the SSD are just missing since it's a proprietary controller and not an off the shelf NVMe drive, but what is known is that the SSD communicates via the T2 chip, and the T2 chip intentionally hides itself from the OS. So it makes perfect sense.

  12. T2 the sequal by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    I'll be back!

    Come to think of it Apple is just the type of company to create something like Skynet.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:T2 the sequal by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      sequal
      English, Noun
      Misspelling of sequel

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:T2 the sequal by sjames · · Score: 1

      Says the guy who misspelled his nick.

    3. Re:T2 the sequal by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Says the guy who doesn't know how to search for something on the web.
      https://knowyourmeme.com/memes...

      "Weird Al" Yankovic even used it in one of his videos:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  13. It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're just listening to it wrong.

  14. Clocksource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they teaching kids in School!?! This is a pretty well known CS thing - There are different types of clock sources in a computer. They differ in whether they are atomic, their resolution, etc. NTP goes to pretty great lengths in making sure clock updates are done somewhat properly but if you're expecting a high resolution monotonic clock that never deviates with say power mode and suddenly the OS changes that well you're going to have a bad time. Doing it in audio is beyond stupid even for apple.

    Fun fact: Everything from the scheduler to network state depends on micro sleeping. Especially at high resolution, a broken clock can destroy performance system wide. There are several utilities to measure clock related functions in Linux, one example is https://github.com/tycho/clockperf.git

  15. How many ways can you say the same thing? by trevc · · Score: 1

    Seems the summary is an attempt at finding how many different ways they could phrase the same information?

    1. Re:How many ways can you say the same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new her.... hmm. UID says otherwise. Ah well, I've been saying that for a while, the summaries on Slashdot are really hard to understand sometimes because of it too. I don't know why they feel the need to write like that. It's like they forget you don't need to cite references for every quote when it hasn't changed. Either they editorialize the original submission just to quote it in full anyway -- "blah bla .. from a [report|study|foo]". Or, they overuse citation verbs: "says" and "said".

        What you end up with is a mess of text literally a transcript like "Cowboyneil said foo", "officer Neil said bar", "Retired Officer cowboyneil of Slashdot Inc. said bah".. etc. They all refer to the same subject.

          A summary should be just that, a summary. There's no need to recite sources beyhond simple inline notations

      "Foo assaulted Baz at bar [1] [2]"
            [1] - Article source
            [2] - Retired Officer cowboyneil of Slashdot Inc.

        Hyperlink on "claimed" and "Foo" would of course suffice as well and be prefered.

  16. 5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Windows has no true multichannel audio subsystem suitable for audio recording, so everyone uses ASIO, which is proprietary. Audio under windows could have better latency.
    Linux has a good audio subsystem, JACK, but it's not standardized, and the kernel has to be completely recompiled for low-latency.
    Macs have a good audio system, but they have no 5.1 ports on anything, and to read this article, they screwing things up.
    Android doesn't have much of an audio system, and it frequently pauses, and so far, only Audio Evolution has done much with USB recording interfaces.
    IOS can play with audio devices, but there's no removable media, and only a hint of the file access necessary for content creation.

    Sigh.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Which is why every audio professional I know uses Amiga and Atari ST computers.

      p.s.: I do not know any audio professional.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Linux is the lesser of all evils, by that analysis.

      Also you're a bit out of date when it comes to the kernel. First of all, you want the real time kernel, not the low-latency kernel these days. Secondly, you don't need to recompile in most distributions, you just grab the precompiled linux-rt package from your repository and reboot into it.

    3. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by e432776 · · Score: 1

      Great post, I'd give you a mod point if I had any right now. Information and experience showing that there are no perfect choices. More and more, I feel this is a general case in computing.

    4. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I owned an Amiga, but I always had to admit that the Atari ST was just made for audio. A friend of mine made audio on his Atari ST for over a decade after they stopped being sold. He only switched to Windows when something finally broke on the Atari that he couldn't fix.

    5. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Almost a decade ago BFS(Brain Fuck Scheduler) entered the fray with some exciting results. The most noticeable difference was the increased gains in latency, but not performance. Phoronix even did some benchmarks where they missed the point(2011), and measured throughput as a performance gauge(missing the point).
      In current day you would ideally use MuQSS or BFS, to reduce latency. Or a realtime kernel from a distribution, which has the option. Liquorix also seem to be a preconfigured option.

    6. Re:5 Platforms of Audo Recording Sadness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I owned an Amiga, but I always had to admit that the Atari ST was just made for audio.

      The STE you mean? The ST couldn't even play PCM audio, it only had FM synthesis. Amigas only had 22kHz audio, but they had it from the beginning (two channels, two voices each.) It's true that the ST had MIDI ports and the Amiga didn't, but a MIDI adapter for the Amiga consisted of an opto-isolator and a level shifter, because its serial port would do 31250bps specifically for that purpose. Consequently, it was not a high cost item, and a savvy user (much more common in those days) could bash one together on their own.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Solution: Find another OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In general, if you want to run a business (aka be a professional in the audio industry), then there's no way around it: Run a business-class OS such as Windows. However, it should be noted that the best pro-level audio software package, assuming we are talking about DAWs, is actually built for and runs on Linux: ardour. DAWs are one of the few areas that Linux desktop actually does surprisingly well.

  18. Dell vs Apple by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because Dell doesn't talk shit like "you're holding it wrong"

    No instead they have Michael Dell saying shit about Apple like "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders" which turned out to be remarkably arrogant and increasingly foolish since he said it.

    and because Dell hasn't tried to build a reputation as making computers which are easier to use than everyone else's.

    Because they couldn't. Dell doesn't make the software that runs their PCs so they don't control enough of the process to even try. Apple more or less succeeded in doing that exact thing. Several times in fact with various iterations of MacOS and iOS. There is a reason Windows mimicked the Mac and Android followed the iPhone. Like them or hate them you cannot deny that Apple does do a good job making comparatively well designed and easy to use interfaces to their products. There is a reason every other PC and smartphone maker follows Apple's lead at least some of the time.

    Also, because Dell seems to have less gigantic fuckups than Apple, per unit shipped.

    Not historically they haven't. Dell's hardware is fine in general but they've had plenty of problems over the years. Measurably more than Apple most years if you believe the PC reliability rankings over the years. I'm not bashing Dell here (in fact I'm typing this on one of their PCs which I purchased with my own money) but let's not pretend they are something special among big computer makers.

    1. Re:Dell vs Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://techcrunch.com/2011/10/18/michael-dell-on-the-infamous-apple-shut-it-down-quote-my-answer-was-largely-misconstrued/

      Dell said that he initially refused to answer the original question in 1997, and after being asked to answer twice he basically responded “What would I do? I’d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders,” because he couldn’t imagine himself being CEO of any other company.

      Dell went on, “The meaning of my answer was that I’m the CEO of Dell, I don’t think about being the CEO of any other company, I’m not a CEO for hire, so if you asked me what I’d do for any other company, it’s not really something I think about.”

      Dell then took a somber tone, “I have tremendous respect for Apple. Obviously Steve will be missed and was a friend.” He described meeting Apple co-founder Steve Jobs at a Houston Apple user group when he was 16 years old, where Dell was in attendance with his Apple II.

    2. Re:Dell vs Apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      No instead they have Michael Dell saying shit about Apple like "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders" which turned out to be remarkably arrogant and increasingly foolish since he said it.

      It's not clear how arrogant and/or foolish it is, since the sun has not yet set on that argument. If Apple continues to prove that it's lost its way by refusing to listen to what customers are asking for, it may well turn out to be perfectly apt, albeit on a longer time scale than anyone expected. You can only call piss rain for so long before people get it in their eyes, and figure out that you're lying.

      There is a reason Windows mimicked the Mac

      Windows never mimicked Mac. Microsoft was on the Motif Working Group. Their GUI mimicked Unix, and vice versa, because Microsoft was part of designing Motif. That's why Windows 3.1 and Unix systems with Motif (and mwm) had virtually identical look and feel when it came to windowing operations, and widget set in general.

      and Android followed the iPhone.

      Android followed the iPhone, sure. Chronologically. But the two are quite different beasts in many ways, and the things they have in common weren't invented by Apple.

      Dell's hardware is fine in general but they've had plenty of problems over the years. Measurably more than Apple most years if you believe the PC reliability rankings over the years.

      I don't. I've used too many Dells, and too many Apples.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Dell vs Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No instead they have Michael Dell saying shit about Apple like "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders" which turned out to be remarkably arrogant and increasingly foolish since he said it.

      You mean because the plummeting share price makes it a worse and worse idea.

    4. Re:Dell vs Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, the current idevice / Android flat UI is from Microsoft. The only thing that could remotely be attributed to apple is the singular home button (but even that's iffy with the Prada coming out about the same time) or some of the UI gestures.

      Every major company has had influences from each other. To say that Windows mimic'd macs is completely wrong LOL (Metro? Task bar at the bottom? Office's Ribbon UI? or are you just saying the grid of icons are copying?)

    5. Re: Dell vs Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stealing (from Xerox) comparatively well designed and easy to use interfaces to their products (whose industrial design was stolen from Braun).

      FTFY.

    6. Re:Dell vs Apple by AC-x · · Score: 1

      There is a reason Windows mimicked the Mac

      Are you talking about the original Mac? Because Xerox would like a word with you.

    7. Re:Dell vs Apple by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Windows and Mac both just wanted to be the Amiga. They thought that meant fancy graphics and stuff but forgot to make their shit just work 100% of the time.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    8. Re:Dell vs Apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows and Mac both just wanted to be the Amiga. They thought that meant fancy graphics and stuff but forgot to make their shit just work 100% of the time.

      What? Go on, pull the other one. I've been an Amigan.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Dell vs Apple by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Windows and Mac both just wanted to be the Amiga.

      As an ex-Amigan, you have no idea how much I wish that were true. Windows and Mac would have been so much better had they took the right lessons from that platform.

      Both platforms, unfortunately, predate the Amiga, and copied virtually nothing from it even after the Amiga was launched.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  19. professional users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We at Apple don't care about professional users. Next question please.

  20. You are using it wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Under Tim Cook the Mac “Pro” line doesn’t mean Professional anymore.

    It now means “look at me I’m doing ‘work’” for those trust fund kids in Starbucks posting to Tumbr.

    1. Re:You are using it wrong. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Sure it does! Professional... who needs to look cool but really only needs a browser and email to do his/her job.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  21. Let's just kill off the last of the Professionals. by Jahoda · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time, there was only one platform that you used for Pro-Audio or video post production. Apple already moved the entire industry to Avid with their Final Cut Fiasco. Considering that so-called system stability was about the only remaining reason to use an Apple vs. a Windows machine for Audio production (not that I've had a "click" from an ASIO device since 2009), this seems like yet another boneheaded move from the company that appears to think that they'll be selling iPhones forever.

  22. Re:Solution: Find another OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a correction: you don't run Windows, you suffer Windows because it has all the good desktop software.

    I wonder if the Windows telemetry/monitoring/voice recognition/fancy GUI bullshit has a noticeable overhead...

  23. Re:mod d03n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just going to say that.

  24. Real musicians play music by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Not computers

    They don't scale and def don't sound melodic, lyrical or real. Just try bells on a laptop then plug into FOH system. You'll understand dynamics in an instant.

    1. Re:Real musicians play music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a studio. What are they recording with? Unless you're paying millions extra per hour of recording time, it's a damn computer.

      I've been a "real musician" for over forty years. Played in orchestras, bands, and folk groups for decades at a time, and still I have a computer for audio in the back room. It's an indispensable tool when sitting down with a guitar, piano or violin to do some writing and arranging, and pops, clicks and pauses while doing so would make me wanna trash the damn computer because those critical moments of creation are ALWAYS when the glitches pop up.

    2. Re:Real musicians play music by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So you think the experience of creation is worth breaking people's eardrums and damaging electronics. That's very interesting.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Real musicians play music by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

      I'm a musician who's always played ' live'. Computer don't scale my instrument of choice. Glitches in realtime performance and the cost to overcome, exceed the expense of simply buying an analog instrument.

      I don't do studio, but respect those who do. Its a different gig. I've witnessed programmers run circles around musicians with sounds, layers and compositions to the extent that they are humanly in-concert un-performable without computer. I've witnessed aging, retiring legends perform 'live' mimicking their instrument while looping a track. I've invested in software instruments only to have the vendor reach down into my machine to replace the tonal pitch map. Completely ended 8mo. project to loft a platform onto stage. You don't own the software, the instruments nor the rights to the music created in pitch, tone or timbre. Manufacturer's do.

      Its simply not my artistry.

  25. And again... by Trimaz · · Score: 1

    ...iToddlers will defend this.

    1. Re:And again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B-but....It just werkz!!!!!!111111

    2. Re:And again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that you mean iDiots!

  26. We're very sorry about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here at Apple, we care very deeply about your privacy, security, and overall experience with our products. Rest assured, we understand the pain and trouble this audio issue may be causing you. We've got our top men working on this problem and will have a solution soon. Very soon. Top men working on it day and night.

    ---
    Sent from my black eye phone.

  27. Exactly the opposite!!! by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Eh, it is exactly the opposite of that. Apple is guaranteed to fix only high-profile bugs and will try to screw you out of support. I've been using Macs at work for a bit over a decade and the examples are too numerous to list, but I'll give some characteristic examples:
    - iPhone 4/4s had a thermal sensor in the wireless module that had a very high failure rate after the first year. The firmware that enabled it came as an update for the iPhone 4, people who never updated did not have an issue, but a good percentage of the rest of the iPhone 4/4s users ended up with "wifi grayed-out", which Apple would not fix out of warranty (they would tell you to reset network settings like it would help), that could be temporarily fixed by a thermal shock (putting the phone in the freezer and the oven). My development iPhone 4 developed the issue, and so did its 3 replacements (only 1 within warranty).
    - My bosses 6-month old mac mini was killing USB devices and the "genius" bar invalidated the warranty claiming they found "dust" inside (! - this was in a smoke-free cat-free office!). Boss was an apple fan and did not believe me when I said they can't do that, so took them on the 10% off a new mac mini offer...
    - Severe bug when moving windows on a secondary portrait monitor that survived 3 major OS X upgrades with ever-increasing report threads on Apple forums. In general, every one of the last major OS X releases since about Leopard feels a bit more buggy than the previous.

    Sure, overall it is a nice unix-based OS with a decent UI, but with the money they make I can't believe how little they care about their customers. Oh, wait, the money they make despite how they treat their customers, explains in itself why the go down this route...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  28. Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds familiar. Some time around OSX 10.9, Apple introduced a bug that would cause USB audio devices to temporarily glitch and drop out. This caused a scramble in the professional audio community with users reverting to 10.8. It seemed no DJ software with an external sound card was safe from the issue. It took Apple until 10.11.2 to fix the issue. My DJ laptops remain on 10.8 because I cannot trust Apple not to break the system, pretend there's no bug, and not fix it for years.

  29. MacOS by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Shoot I was hoping why the bluetooth starts cutting out randomly and with loud pops after the laptop comes back from suspension.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  30. "security" by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Biometric credentials stored in cleartext give me the heebie-jeebies.

    It's biometric credentials stored in the refrigerator that should give you the heebie-jeebies.

    "So, I need the owner's finger to unlock this?" [gets out knife]

    "So, I need the owner's face to unlock this?" [gets out bigger knife]

    ...and then there's the old...

    "So, the owner has to be alive?" [gets out bottle of chloroform and a washcloth] and [hey Larry, you still have that pipe wrench?] and of course [that's a nice /noun/ you have there... be a shame if something happened to /pronoun/.]

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  31. Oh yeah, I remember the magsafe connector. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    The only good connector used on a Mac in the last 15 years is the Magsafe connector.

    FTFY

    But not to worry. They stopped using it.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  32. Apple slipping by felixrising · · Score: 1

    Although not as irritating, I really see Tim Cook as Apple's Steve Ballmer... Business and supply chain focused, but actually crap at design and strategic direction and inspiring customers... Apple just needs to find it's Satya Nadella.

    1. Re:Apple slipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 100%. Tim Cook is trash that needs to be taken out. Been on Apple since the Mac Plus and my next laptop is likely to NOT be from Apple I am so fed up.

    2. Re:Apple slipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] Apple just needs to find it's Satya Nadella.

      Apple just needs to resurrect Steve Jobs.

      There, FTFY.

  33. Lemme guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They removed the audio jack. No, I don't read the TFSs.

  34. Re: The T2 stuff is why I won't buy another Mac.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    7 pound laptop? Are you from 2005?

  35. T2 is evil by sad_ · · Score: 1

    please stop calling it a security chip.
    the only thing it secures is a bunch of benefits for Apple, not for the user.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.