Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Target Combining iPhone, iPad and Mac Apps by 2021: Report (bloomberg.com)

Mark Gurman, reporting for Bloomberg: Apple wants to make it easier for software coders to create tools, games and other applications for its main devices in one fell swoop -- an overhaul designed to encourage app development and, ultimately, boost revenue. The ultimate goal of the multistep initiative, code-named "Marzipan," is by 2021 to help developers build an app once and have it work on the iPhone, iPad and Mac computers, said people familiar with the effort. That should spur the creation of new software, increasing the utility of the company's gadgets.

Later this year, Apple plans to let developers port their iPad apps to Mac computers via a new software development kit that the company will release as early as June at its annual developer conference. Developers will still need to submit separate versions of the app to Apple's iOS and Mac App Stores, but the new kit will mean they don't have to write the underlying software code twice, said the people familiar with the plan. In 2020, Apple plans to expand the kit so iPhone applications can be converted into Mac apps in the same way.
Further reading: Tim Cook, in April 2018: Users Don't Want iOS To Merge With MacOS.

124 comments

  1. Sounds nice... by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Later this year, Apple plans to let developers port their iPad apps to Mac computers via a new software development kit that the company will release as early as June at its annual developer conference. Developers will still need to submit separate versions of the app to Apple's iOS and Mac App Stores, but the new kit will mean they don't have to write the underlying software code twice, said the people familiar with the plan. In 2020, Apple plans to expand the kit so iPhone applications can be converted into Mac apps in the same way.

    Sounds like a sensible thing to do. Having said that, I am also looking forward to a long list of people chiming in here on Slashdot to explain to us how this is only one part of a vast malevolent Apple conspiracy against the public.

    1. Re:Sounds nice... by Lurks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay I'll bite. Because we have it already, it's the goddamn web. Which you can build desktop and mobile apps out of, which just needs some support from Apple for the fancier bits of the standards behind PWAs but which Apple wont support ... because it doesn't force you to buy their goddamn desktop computers just to make things for their mobile phones.

    2. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So apps like the Adobe creative cloud suite and Final Cut Pro run on the web? Really? What? I think you're mistaken.

    3. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for getting in early with how revolutionary and innovative apple is. However you forgot you mention how it will sell like hotcakes.

    4. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later this year, Apple plans to let developers port their iPad apps to Mac computers via a new software development kit that the company will release as early as June at its annual developer conference. Developers will still need to submit separate versions of the app to Apple's iOS and Mac App Stores, but the new kit will mean they don't have to write the underlying software code twice, said the people familiar with the plan. In 2020, Apple plans to expand the kit so iPhone applications can be converted into Mac apps in the same way.

      Sounds like a sensible thing to do. Having said that, I am also looking forward to a long list of people chiming in here on Slashdot to explain to us how this is only one part of a vast malevolent Apple conspiracy against the public.

      What ever do you mean? The keynote writes itself...

      Introducing the MacPhonePad, a worthy upgrade from the human centi pad

      A breakthrough communications device
      A breakthrough multimedia device
      A breakthrough productivity device

      iPhone , iPad, Mac

      a MacBook that runs iOS and can use AirPods to make calls HAS to be better than owning an iPhone, an iPad AND a MacBook right?

      and the price will be very low, since they are combining 3 Apple Inventions in 1 new Apple Invention... IT has NO competition.... ONLY courage$$!!

      At only double the price of the combined price of the 3 devices is supposedly replaces, it is a bargain...
      propietary Charger, Cables, AirPods and all other equipment sold seperetly

      Of course, at that time... they will be their usually 4-8 years behind their actual competition that they still try to deny exists.... That will not stop them or Apple iSheeps to claim that Apple invented it and everything else of course!

    5. Re: Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can run them on an iPhone you can run them on the web and with wasm there isn't much you can't theoretically run in a browser - if the support is there.

    6. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for starters, what it means is if you're writing something, you now have to write it for the lowest common denominator.

    7. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure it's so sensible. Space comes at a premium, specially in the mobile ecosystem. 600mb for a Twitter app anyone? (provided they go back to develop for apple devices) 700mb for netflix?... because they will include the binaries for all devices. And even when they don't, what the heck. Do you need gcc to compile stuff? 3-4Gb... because of apple bundles gcc with xcode.

      Install a handful of apps, and I bet 3-4Gb will be gone in your iDevice.

    8. Re:Sounds nice... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      A breakthrough communications device
      A breakthrough multimedia device
      A breakthrough productivity device

      The only iThing which can be turned into the most powerful vacuum cleaner!

      iThings for sale
      And I am selling to girls
      They always know who I am, what I do
      She gave me no wink
      Just a smile of her hips
      And a sip of my glass
      And let's go

    9. Re:Sounds nice... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Or you can specify minimum device requirements, which is the way both the iOS and desktop app stores deal with multiple generations of hardware and OS right now.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    10. Re:Sounds nice... by Freischutz · · Score: 0

      Thanks for getting in early with how revolutionary and innovative apple is. However you forgot you mention how it will sell like hotcakes.

      See, here comes the hyperbole of outrage. I didn't say this plan of theirs was revolutionary, I din't say it was innovative either ... I just that it was a good idea (for them and their product line).

    11. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they are going to do Microsoft and fuck up the user interface even further for mac, so touch screens only. Probably they whole keyboard will just be a touchscreen aswell. They've already started that process.

    12. Re:Sounds nice... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There isn't much reason why it cannot run on the web.
      The Modern Web Browser is a thin client solution. Even traditional CPU intensive programs, can run on the web now. Because the the heavy CPU stuff is happening in the Cloud, shared with others All the browser and you normally just need a way to input the data into the system, and get the output back.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but then you aren't really writing "one app for all platforms", now are you? If one really wants a "write once and run on all platforms", you are inherently limited by the lowest common denominator. If you want more functionality on more powerful systems, now you're writing multi-platform code which allows you to reuse common components among multiple versions, but still requires separate development for each platform. And if that's what Apple is aiming for with this, well, then shit, they should hire me because I've been doing that for decades. But with how it's worded, it sounds like they're aiming at the lowest common denominator solution.

    14. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer apps did not require the web to function. I like being able to have functionality with my business if a connection went down. There are so many companies that are so cloud dependent that if there were any significant loss of Internet connectivity, they likely would be bankrupt in a few days.

      The cloud is worse than the mainframe. At least if you didn't pay IBM, you got to keep your mainframe, although with no support. Don't pay your cloud bill, kiss access to all your data goodbye. I'm amazed that businesses don't like mainframes but want to shackle themselves with even shorter chains to cloud providers which are even more proprietary.

      You keep your web apps. I prefer stuff run locally. As an added bonus, one cloud provider hack won't destroy my stuff.

    15. Re:Sounds nice... by Camembert · · Score: 1

      They could do an intelligent download from the app store so that only the relevant binary is in the package.

    16. Re:Sounds nice... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Slashdot to explain to us how this is only one part of a vast malevolent Apple conspiracy against the public.

      It's not a malevolent conspiracy. It's just Apple being last to the market copying all the least desirable aspects from other platforms. And honestly it's about time. I was getting sick of well designed purpose built applications and was just thinking the other day why can't everyone be the Universal Windows Platform and write horrible phone applications for the PC.

    17. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a conspiracy. Fact. The one marzipan app on my system has no option to be removed.

      Do you own shares in Apple that you have to criticize people even before they speak?

      There are serious issues with the mobile world that make the technology a none starter for the desktop environment that are fixed by convoluted proprietary solutions. It's not a conspiracy it's a fact.

    18. Re: Sounds nice... by saloomy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Web has its day, and frankly, couldn't be more of a failure in terms of desktop compute. Sorry, but it's the truth. Remember how shitty flash on the web was? Remember endless updates to the desktop clients, slow sites, and browser wars that lead to vast amounts of incompatibility? Remember when Steve Jobs wrote thoughts on flash?

      If the web was the answer, then it would have already done it, and there would be nothing Apple could do to stop It. The iPhone and the Mac both support the Web, so if you really think that's how your app should work, fine. Write your app in a site.

      Apps have code vetted by Apple, which is miles better than the shit show happening on Android. Not a week goes by where there isn't a story about more malware-ridden apps on Android, whereas Apple's App Store, while not perfect is significantly less buggy and way more trust worthy. Perfect? No. But better.

      I use both iPhones and Macs, and I love this idea. I develop on my Mac, and it annoys me that I have to grab my phone to do things on Apps i don't have on my Mac, like turn on my Car's climate controls before I head out of the office. There are so many apps that just work on iPhone and I don't have the same app on my Mac, it would be great to run those apps on both.

      I don't see why this is a bad thing. Especially since Apple hasn't said they will block third party apps on Mac.

    19. Re:Sounds nice... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      No. Just: no. That is all.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    20. Re:Sounds nice... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      PWAs work on iPhones/iPads since decades. (Progressive Web Apps)
      And there is nothing special "to support", just use HTML5 and be done with it.

      I hate stupid haters ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    21. Re: Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately that's not now how macos apps work atm (apps contain[ed] bibaries for ppc and x86_64). But, we'll see...

    22. Re:Sounds nice... by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      I don't think you've been paying attention. Numerous Android and iOS apps are merely Angular, Ionic, etc. web applications running inside a Cordova container. On the Linux/MacOS/Windows desktops numerous apps (e.g.: Slack, VS Code) are merely web applications running inside a some kind of NodeJS container like Electron.

      So yes, they're web apps, just running locally.

    23. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's a conspiracy, I think it's just a continuation of the trend of bloody stupid UI design choices that's infected the software industry, and Apple in particular, for the last several years. Because you know that almost no apps will bother to do separate UIs for the different platforms, so everything will default to cell-phone style, which is nearly useless.

      Of course, Apple is the king of form over function. Just got moved to a new office, where the (company standard) ultra-glossy monitor looks great... until you have to actually use it, and all the glare makes it next to impossible to use.

    24. Re:Sounds nice... by Lurks · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Comments here reflect a lack of understanding about what modern web apps are like and how pervasive they are.

    25. Re:Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Idiot!

    26. Re: Sounds nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely and itâ(TM)s that crap weâ(TM)re trying to get rid of. Convenient for lazy, overpaid developers, disastrous for customers. We want productive business tools, not functionality checklists. Apple natives all the way.

  2. So, we'll have an Applebook, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is, an under-powered and expensive tablet that can make phone calls and have a detachable keyboard?

    Nice, I'm still not buying it.

  3. Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by nicolaiplum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's going to be the leading platform for capabilities in the software design?

    Is this going to be apps designed for Mac OS first and then adapted for iOS and touch interface limitations?

    Or is it going to be iOS applications running on Mac OS with all the small-screen, touch interface, single task, single window restrictions of iOS design in the Mac OS app?

    I fear it will be the second one, and Mac OS apps will get worse as a result.

    I have an iPad pro and I've tried working on it. I'm using a Mac and not an iPad because the iPad is no use for serious, creative work.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by swimboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We already have a few Marzipan apps in MacOS 10.14, namely the News and Home apps. And your fears are well founded. I'm hoping that they're just proof-of-concept apps and that Apple will figure out how to expand the UI to encompass more Mac-like behavior on the mac, because right now, the only good thing that you can say about Marzipan apps on the Mac is that when you click on them, they launch.

      --
      Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
    2. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it will be the second. The aim across the industry is to make money on services and data collection with all use of computerized devices. No one with any sense would actually try to adapt productivity software to phones, and limited phone apps have little relevance on desktops/laptops.

      It's a kind of emperor's new apps: Maybe if we tell you enough times then you'll eventually believe that all you really want from any device is shopping.

    3. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what happened with websites becoming responsive (aka mobile-first), desktop got worse as a result.

    4. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by execthts · · Score: 1

      Microsoft tried this like twice (if not thrice) since Windows 8. As to the subject: "Desktop class applications and networking. Not the crippled stuff that you find on most phones."

    5. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by kick6 · · Score: 1

      I have an iPad pro and I've tried working on it. I'm using a Mac and not an iPad because the iPad is no use for serious, creative work.

      but..but..but...it has pro in the name! That means it's for professionals! /s

    6. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I don't you could have been less insightful if you tried.

    7. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's any doubt that one of the things that will happen is, iOS developers will make lazy macOS ports of their apps, creating junky apps that look and behave like mobile apps running incongruously on a desktop OS. I don't see that as a problem in and of itself. Give developers tools, and let them do what they want. Some will make junk, but that's fine.

      Just so long as Apple doesn't use it as an excuse to further limit what developers can do on their OS. We need iOS to become more open like a desktop operating system, not for the macOS to become more closed off like a mobile operating system.

    8. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The software will follow the users. So yeah, it's going to get dumbed down.

    9. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be dumbed down. Tim Cook only cares about people who goto websites like facebook. That's why modern macs have such lowend processors and ship with hardly any RAM. Tim says that you don't need it for facebook.

    10. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need iOS to become more open like a desktop operating system, not for the macOS to become more closed off like a mobile operating system.

      You're setting yourself up for disappointment.

    11. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      They will be brave, removing the keyboard and having to type on an iPhone over Bluetooth. Because she wants to learn touch typing when your thumbs Just Work?

    12. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You the whole sentence!

    13. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Camembert · · Score: 1

      It depends for which profession. Programmers, not much; for artists: interesting.

    14. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      How long have you watched this development to still have hope?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey did you ever solve your medical problem from years ago?
      https://science.slashdot.org/c...
      just wondering because your email doesn't work

    16. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      I fear what you fear, the complete dumbed-down IOSification of OSX and it's applications.

    17. Re: Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, artists create things, they don't just watch and listen to what others have created.

    18. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logic Pro was already redone with big iOS controls with the release of Logic Pro X years ago. It shares many of the same widgets as iOS Garage Band. Does it wast screen real estate? Yeah a little. Did it dumb down the app? No.

    19. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only creative work I've found the iPad to be any good for is Drawing. And while it excels at that, the interface just doesn't lend itself to power-plays in other creative works. Music production? Desktop. Writing? Can be done if you're a one page at a time writer, but if you're a novelist trying to track your timelines on a spreadsheet and your characters in another spreadsheet and writing on another document? Nope. Gotta be the desktop. Coding? Absolute joke on iOS.

      And Apple has a history of dumbing down their pro apps to appease the "too hard to learn" crowd. If Logic goes the way that their video production has gone, I'll probably be stepping away from the Mac world. Which is sad, as it's been good to me, but I'm not going down with an ever lowering bar until there's nothing left to slink under.

    20. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      execthts: Thank you! Windows users greeted the tablet/phone centric changes of Windows 8 like the proverbial turd in a punchbowl.

      Desktops/laptops with keyboard and mice allow you to have considerably more complex and powerful applications. And desktop/laptop users do NOT want touch interfaces.

      If Apple's push here means that Macs can run iOS apps, then that's reasonably laudable and will probably be welcomed by Mac users.

      If Apple wants to dumb down Macs to an iOS level interface, however, users will be very, very unhappy, and rightly so.

    21. Re:Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      No ad blocking, no firewalls to stop ads. No way to get past the OS.
      Browsers that have to allow ads to get OS approved.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    22. Re: Dumbed down Mac OS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logic Pro X is buggy as hell sadly. I love it and won't use any other DAW but each point update makes it even more crashy and bug ridden. :(

  4. Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only this time it'll work! Just you wait and see! I stake your life savings on it!

    1. Re:Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Windows 8 was just ahead of its time.

    2. Re:Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It will be cool and innovative (and courageous!) this time, because Apple Is Doing It First.

    3. Re:Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The problem with MS isn’t that they have bad ideas. Implementation has always been their weakness. Windows 8 would have worked much better if it defaulted to desktop UI when you were on a desktop and tablet UI when you were on tablet instead of trying to force everyone to tablet and doing it badly.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If you mean that we're heading for a cliff with the development of our systems and it decided to be ahead, then yes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Windows 8 A!! OVER! AGAIN! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The main difference will be that this time there will not be a Version 2 that lets you undo the bullshit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The hardware, not the software. I want a phone that unfolds into a tablet, then a keyboard will fold out to become a laptop.

    1. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want a pony

    2. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by kick6 · · Score: 1

      dream bigger: a golden pony that farts cotton candy

    3. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by gander666 · · Score: 1

      And poops neapolitan ice cream scoops too

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    4. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps the use of an Apple device in combination with mushrooms can help you out... Apple devices maaaaaan.... they are just... faaaaaar out maaaaaaan!

      but a phone that unfolds and a tablet that unfolds.. hmm... I am pretty sure both the current iPhones and iPads both are able to fold in to a door stop, but they don't fold back though... Apple does not have such a product, therefore you do not, by definition, need it...

    5. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by tepples · · Score: 1

      You can find My Little Pony products in any toy store: Walmart, Target, or wherever.

    6. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Can't offer that, but would an ice cream pooping unicorn do?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:I want a combined iPhone, iPad and Mac by hawk · · Score: 1

      \{begin homer _voice}
      "Damn you, Law of Conservation of Matter"
      \{end homer _voice}

      hawk

  6. Seems easy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they are targeting for Intel x64 emulation on ARM also (which I highly doubt), just adding a layer of ARM emulation on existing Macs seems easy enough. Bluestacks does a great job running Android on Windows for years, so it's completely feasible.

    Obviously performance on Macs will suffer a bit. Probably doesn't matter as Apple is just preparing the terrain for a complete ARM switch on Macs.

    1. Re:Seems easy enough by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Probably doesn't matter as Apple is just preparing the terrain for a complete ARM switch on Macs.

      This is the only insightful comment on this thread. The switch has nothing to do with user "experience" or developer ease or any of that other BS nonsense. This is about them wanting to abstract their platform off of a CPU controlled by someone other than them. Why - because they are a bunch of control freak assholes who hate paying anyone else their due - see Qualcomm.

  7. And once that's done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After that they'll combine Mac OS and iOS back into a single OS.

    Er, like it was before they split them.

    NMHTC.

  8. User Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Though I don't own any Apple products, I always said they make good hardware and I'd happily use a Mac if they were cheaper to buy, but that all hinges on having 2 things:
    - The ability to download and install apps outside the walled garden without having to depend on a jailbreak method.
    - Admin privileges with the ability to view/manipulate my own filesystem.
    If they sabotage either of those two things, I can't seriously recommend anyone buy a Mac anymore.

  9. Isn't this one of the goals of HTML5? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Create apps that run on smartphones, tablets and traditional computers?

    1. Re:Isn't this one of the goals of HTML5? by bangular · · Score: 2

      It's funny how the tech world works. Most tech companies thought html5 + javascript was the future. It makes complete sense from a rational point of view. Then the developers complained they needed native and then slowly they all caved.

      Now I think developers are finally realizing that their app to display octopus recipes doesn't need the same performance as a first person shooter. ES6 and ES8 have made javascript tolerable, and typescript is now mainstream. There's been a battle for the fastest javascript engine and javascript far outpaces other scripting languages in terms of execution speed.

      It always seemed bonkers to me that I would have to download an app running java or objective-c to display essentially a webpage. We would never tolerate this on the desktop, but somehow it became the norm on mobile. I'm glad PWA is making progress (though apple seems to want to sabotage it). Realistically, looking at my phone right now, I have maybe 2 apps that actually need native. The rest are glorified web pages.

    2. Re:Isn't this one of the goals of HTML5? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I dunno? My experience on the desktop is, you really DO want native apps vs "yet another app you use as a web page in your favorite browser". If nothing else, it's just advantageous from the standpoint of keeping things compartmentalized while utilizing the whole UI that's been built around manipulating individual apps.

      As one example? Our office VoIP system used to use a control panel that ran in Java. It was cross-platform Mac and Windows compatible that way. Eventually, the company decided it was less development effort to just design a web browser based control panel. It has more functionality (nothing they couldn't have done in the old client if they wanted to -- but lot of things that probably were easy to add once they had the client running in a full size web browser window). Yet few of our employees like the thing. All we heard were complaints when they forced the transition, and many just stopped using their desk phones rather than deal with it.

      The thing is, a small app that retains your login/password info and auto-starts at system boot is really user-friendly. It's "just there" when you sign in and your OS remember the window size and position for you, popping it up exactly where you like to have it. With the browser app, you're always required to load a more resource intensive full browser to use it, and you'll have to resize it at each launch if you want it to act like a toolbar on your desktop. If the browser its in is your default browser, it's immediately going to be hidden behind screens for other URLs you click on while working. And the overall "feel" is that it's something you should only have as a fall-back alternative to a full-blown client.

  10. Right Idea by 0101000001001010 · · Score: 1

    Fundamentally I think this is the right idea. Merge the developer experience to the extent possible, i.e. outside of the interface design. Merge the retail experience. Look how much better the iPhone/iPad experience is with universal apps.

    But leave the user experience separate. Because a phone is different from a tablet is different from a traditional computer. Trying for the same user experience across the board is not that great.

    How knows? Maybe in the process we'll get pointer support on iPad Pros and be able to run Mac-style apps on it. That would be a big bonus in my book.

  11. SteveJobs redux... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Sheesh... can Tim Cook possibly innovate something new rather than rebrand inherent Obj-C ability to abstract over multiple platforms?

    This capability was built last century by NeXT. Its not simple to update it to iOS. BUT it's an inherent attribute of the language both MacOS X and iOS operating systems share. The two aren't compatible. I don't see the value in masquerading a dingy as a cruise ship. It would be the ultimate undoing of MacOS X desktop to trivialize applications down to iOS thumbnail capability running on a workstation class OS. There's nowhere to go but down. Seriously? I guess AI and AR are just around the corner then. People don't need no stinking power just keyboard and screens!

    Welcome to time-share, rent and subscriptions.

    1. Re:SteveJobs redux... by presearch · · Score: 1

      It's all Swift now. Obj-C is viewed as legacy there. They don't say it officially, but it's pretty evident. After writing in Swift for half a year, I think it's a good move. It started out as a mutt, but they've been very open on refining it. The APIs are already pretty close but for some naming conventions. My porting from Obj-C to Swift wasn't too painful. Xcode helps that quite a bit. The port code is smaller, faster and more (ugh that word) elegant. I wouldn't want to go back to Obj-C and it's -way- more fun than (ugh that word) C++.

      Merging the platforms doesn't have to be dumbing down the Mac either. Maybe it'll be a whole new hybrid OS. Considering how little it costs Apple for their home-grown SOCs, perhaps they'll just add one along side the Intel parts for a few years.

  12. 2021 is five years too late by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs had said that merging Mac and iOS platforms didn't make sense, and he was right... At the time. The technology wasn't available to make a worthwhile product.

    But Microsoft introduced the Surface YEARS ago. Apple ceded a lot of "influencer" users to Microsoft, especially creatives who wanted a proper pen tablet computer.

    Apple should have been at the front of the tablet (fully fledged) computer movement. Now we see just how long we'll have to wait for them to catch up.

    Maybe by 2030 they'll realize that Vulkan is a good idea.

    1. Re:2021 is five years too late by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      creatives don't want N-Trig.

    2. Re:2021 is five years too late by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      Enough of them have compromised to prove that Apple allowed that market to flee.

  13. XCode on the iPad would be awesome by mark-t · · Score: 1

    But I have a pretty strong hunch it'll never happen.

    1. Re:XCode on the iPad would be awesome by Sebby · · Score: 1

      But I have a pretty strong hunch it'll never happen.

      It'll happen, just not the same way Xcode works now...

      Think of how they've done the Swift playgrounds. And how they process submitted app builds' byte-code to make it platform-independant, but produce hardware-specific builds for distribution.

      Now think of how they can provide a sort of terminal-like version of Xcode, where you program on the iPad, but the building is actually done by a server cluster farm Apple provides. It simplifies development (build-wise) and distribution, and removes the dependency to have a Mac (which I'm convinced Apple wishes they didn't need - more than likely they want to stop bothering to make Macs anymore).

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    2. Re:XCode on the iPad would be awesome by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Removing the requirement to have a Mac to develop iDevice applications means that it becomes increasingly practical for non-developers to install applications from source on their devices.... applications that might do things that bypass normal App store restrictions. p> I don't think Apple wants to do that.

    3. Re:XCode on the iPad would be awesome by Sebby · · Score: 1

      Removing the requirement to have a Mac to develop iDevice applications means that it becomes increasingly practical for non-developers to install applications from source on their devices.... applications that might do things that bypass normal App store restrictions.

      I don't think Apple wants to do that.

      Doing it this way doesn't mean Apple will 'give up' its control - in fact knowing Apple I don't expect it to make it 'easy' for anyone to bypass its store, and will likely eliminate side-loading (betcha we won't be able to 'import' github projects); I don't envision Apple allowing the building process to not go through its own services in order to restrict things.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    4. Re:XCode on the iPad would be awesome by mark-t · · Score: 1

      So they will have to deliberately "cripple" XCode in order to make it viable on iDevices.

      Not being able to import source code into a development environment completely defeats the point of having one.

    5. Re:XCode on the iPad would be awesome by Sebby · · Score: 1

      So they will have to deliberately "cripple" XCode in order to make it viable on iDevices.

      "Cripple" is Apple's middle name, because courage.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  14. Microsoft tried this.. by kerubi · · Score: 1

    Microsoft tried this. And look at all those nice Windows Phones now! I guess I know now when to switch to Android :)

    --
    I joined two users too late.
  15. Consolidation by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because we have it already, it's the goddamn web. Which you can build desktop and mobile apps out of

    Yeah Apple tried this with the original iPhone. They were going to do everything on the web if you recall. Didn't work. Why? So glad you asked. Because not everything can/should/does need to be done on the web. There are literally countless use cases which are better done locally than on the web. PWAs have their place and will be great for some use cases but they aren't the proper solution for every problem.

    I've been saying for years that mobile device software is going to gradually merge with PC software. While there are some practical difficulties in doing this, it makes a ton of sense if someone can pull it off. Microsoft has been trying to get the formula right on this for a long time with mixed success. Google is trying to get Android to be more than just a mobile phone OS. It's not an easy problem but there really is no long term advantage to Apple or to their users in maintaining two separate and mostly incompatible operating systems. Nobody has nailed the formula yet but the first company to figure it out is going to rake in a lot of money for their trouble.

    I know Apple has historically said they aren't interesting in merging MacOS and iOS but you can tell by their actions that this was just a public relations move so they wouldn't get pushed on it. They've been gradually moving towards consolidating their hardware and systems for quite a while now. The problem with doing so has been A) reconciling the very different user interfaces in a practical way and B) the limitations of the hardware of the day. Over time these problems can be resolved but not before a certain tipping point is reached.

    1. Re: Consolidation by reanjr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Not everything can/should/does need to be done" on a generic unified platform that forces developers to lowest common denominator.

    2. Re:Consolidation by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      But with apple ios is
      No finder
      No / limited apps shearing data files.
      No / limited mods / plugins
      limited emulators with rom folders
      No nvidia if the ios lockdown comes to apple desktops even with TB based pci-e cards.

    3. Re: Consolidation by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Apple's problem is that no one has any reason to develop proper macOS applications these days. No one really uses macOS outside of people developing iOS apps.

      So creating this unified platform is less about something that makes sense as a tool you should use, and more about Apple desperately trying to get people to release macOS apps on the macOS App Store that literally no one uses.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    4. Re: Consolidation by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No one really uses macOS outside of people developing iOS apps.
      You are an idiot. (Where do actually all the Mac applications come from?)

      Go to any developer conference, especially if it is centered around Java, and look what the people have on their desk: 80% are Mac's and I would bet a huge deal of the remaining run Linux.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  16. just slap a touch screen on the mac and done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess all they need to do is add a touch screen to the mac and run the ipad simulator. ;) That. way they can remove the mouse and trackpad...... ohhh wait!

  17. Adobe's problem, Not Apple's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you can run all of the CC "apps" in a browser. Adobe already has web-only versions of most of their apps. Why anyone you would want to use garbage like that escapes me.

    Of course I only support a multi-billion dollar multinational print corporation with design centers around the world, all of which depend on Adobe CC and none of which would ever consider using the web apps, but there may be some market for which Photoshop on an iPhone is the bomb. I don't want to see or support that market, but it is probably there.

  18. Always funny by reanjr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Always funny when Apple discovers Microsoft's strategies from decades past.

    1. Re:Always funny by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      That’s assuming that hasn’t been Apple’s strategy. It might have been all along but Apple didn’t think that enough development had been done. For example you could argue that the iPod Touch was a copy of the Zune but done right. However, if you were paying attention to Apple it seemed like they were going to make it after the iPhone and leverage all the technologies. For the most part, an iPod Touch is an iPhone without the cellular components.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re: Always funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always funny when Apple discovers Microsoft's strategies from decades past.

      Which one?

      Decades ago, WinCE was a Win9X desktop style interface crammed onto a mobile device.
      Desktop --> mobile screen has been universally recognized as a bad idea.

      Much more recently Microsoft tried the unified approach going the other direction with Metro, but their mobile platforms never took off.

  19. Commercial Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that Apple and every other tech company out there is in business to make money - or as some call it - to be a commercial success. If youâ(TM)re still looking to scratch your practicing computer science itch, donâ(TM)t look to Apple to cater to you. Science doesnâ(TM)t pay unless itâ(TM)s promising something orgasmic. There is no more Applegasm left. Check with our friends in the Linux camp on how you can get involved if thatâ(TM)s what youâ(TM)re after. There should be at least a few more decades of wizard hattery left in that scene. At least until Amazon takes it over and closes it up.

  20. The answer is in the framework by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Or is it going to be iOS applications running on Mac OS ?

    The Marzipan effort is entirely about allowing you to use IOS frameworks for Mac apps.

    with all the small-screen, touch interface, single task, single window restrictions of iOS design in the Mac OS app

    What the hell man.

    The iPad screens are already fairly large.

    Yes the UI is touch but also keyboard, or perhaps you forgot that?

    iOS apps are far from "single task", and on the iPad support things like side by side apps with a floating window playing video from a third... in reality internally iOS has never been single-task, but a fully multi-tasking system.

    So Marzipan apps on a Mac would be no more "single task" than any other desktop app.

    I have an iPad pro and I've tried working on it. I'm using a Mac and not an iPad because the iPad is no use for serious, creative work.

    I have both as well and prefer photo editing on an iPad, because its way better to have a direct use tablet with a stylus for that task.

    Some people prefer writing on iPads because the writing UI really does take over the whole screen.

    For other things I prefer the desktop but there is nothing I would not love to be able to do on an iPad as well, and have that choice...

    Something you do not seem to have considered, is that as Marzipan is built out, people will clamor for some desktop abilities in those apps, which may flow back and improve the iPad. Wouldn't that be useful? Do not fear change...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. Unified devices greater than sum of parts by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Not everything can/should/does need to be done" on a generic unified platform that forces developers to lowest common denominator.

    You are arguing that general purpose computers are de-facto a lowest common denominator. Your argument makes no sense and unified platforms are often greater than the sum of the parts. In case you have forgotten both PCs and smartphones are generic unified platforms. My smartphone replaced to varying degrees my (deep breath...) calendar, point-and-shoot camera, PDA, video recorder, laptop (for some use cases), walkman, photo album, flashlight, television, credit card (ApplePay/GooglePay), voicemail machine, remote control, alarm clock, to-do list, GPS, address book, weather station, physical books (kindle app), encyclopedia, and the list goes on. PCs have replaced a similar swath of equipment. Both are general purpose devices that can be programmed to do whatever task we need. There is no objective reason PCs and smartphones have to exist as separate operating systems for the rest of eternity and there are a lot of compelling reasons to want to merge them into a single code base.

    Are you seriously going to argue that the smartphone is somehow a "lowest common denominator"? Sure I can schlep around my big heavy SLR camera which can take better pictures (at considerable cost) but at the expense of portability and convenience. It makes more sense to take Good Enough pictures with my phone 99% of the time. On the occasion when I need better image quality I know where/how to get it but that isn't a sane argument against "generic unified platforms".

    1. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by reanjr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The lowest common denominator between a phone and desktop is big grids of icon tiles. This is what constitutes a "modern" UI. It's crap. Touch doesn't work like a mouse. The goal of unification infects everything, from scrolling direction, to information density, to emoji support in Unicode. Nothing good comes from unifying two disparate platforms.

    2. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Ironically, back when MS was going hard on unification, Apple was pushing bespoke skeuomorphic design and telling us everything must be redesigned from scratch with every app.

    3. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Touch doesn't work like a mouse.
      Actually: it does.

      No idea why guys on /. try to argue otherwise. Oh, you have a mouse with 5 buttons, sure, my touch skills probably won't be on par with that.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Oh really? How do you hover? How's accessibility work?

    5. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You touch ... that is translated into hover. Should be obvious if you ever used a touch only device.

      No idea what you mean with "accessibility" ... you should be more concrete.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by reanjr · · Score: 1

      How do you distinquish between hover and "mouse" down?

      If you don't understand the difference between a mouse and touch, you're probably not informed enough to continue discussing HIDs.

    7. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by reanjr · · Score: 1

      By "accessibility" I mean, how does someone with motor deficiency in their hands use a touch device?

    8. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No idea, I don't know such people.

      Most modern devices can mostly be controlled by speech.

      Anyway, how does translate your question to a laptop? Hu?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: Unified devices greater than sum of parts by ameliared · · Score: 1
  22. When you click on them, they launch by sconeu · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that having them launch is a good thing.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  23. I do & so does everyone else... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & realize those who control the media (& we all KNOW who those SWINE are kicked nation to nation thru time) are in league w/ the chinks per Davos switzerland BANKERS (aka Rothchild jews) where Xi Ping the 2" prick himself dictator said he'd "get the USA" or something much like it...

    * As to the REST of my subject & what it says? Here is what I THINK of CHINGOLAND https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & agree w/ you 100% IF you read that.

    Do you REALLY think the 'trolls' that are Anti-Trump are REALLY believing that bs? Hell no - they're on SOROS' payroll, like Antifa was (Jew Soros was caught NOT PAYING THEM & they spilt the beans on that too) - they merely execute what is TOLD them but when cornered? They can't think for themselves & only spit back what their paymasters told them - little depth, that's HOW you beat them into the dirt too by the by!

    So when you THINK others don't? That's what the JEW MEDIA wants you to think so it upsets you - tell them:

    "Save the WEAK wannabe 'Jedi mind tricks' that work on the weak minded - you don't THINK for ME - I do, for myself & KNOW you're FUCKING LIARS!"

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly, understand EVERY FORUMS YOU GO TO is PUSHING someone's "AGENDA" for SHEKELS - & they tried the "RUSSIA" bs, nothing behind it for YEARS now & FAILED - they tried to crap on Catholic school kids too (gosh wonder WHY jews?) & SHIT THEMSELVES on that too w/ Joy Behar the Jewess ADMITTING they were "desperate" - born LIARS is more like it & for greed/for the love of the "Holy dollar" SHEKELS (& yes that INCLUDES /. pushing others' REAL AGENDA w/ JOOgle @ the helm here funding it MOSTLY & pulling "whipslash"'s chain like the GOOD "Lil' DOG" he is, the mangy cur whom I've SHIT ON for the past 2 yrs. no less showing everyone how STUPID the fuck is trying to "get the better of me" & "ban me" (lol, good luck that, the stupid punk bitch he is))... apk

  24. No, actually not well founded by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    We already have a few Marzipan apps in MacOS 10.14, namely the News and Home apps. And your fears are well founded.

    Those are basically test apps of a pre-release version of the framework, the final version will have a lot more ability and not be so removed from the system.

    There's no reason to think Marzipan apps need be much less featured, when iOS has many of the same frameworks the Mac does for doing just about anything. The reason Marzipan exists is because the Mac UI framework is pretty old at this point and has so much stuff tacked on it can be hard to build out windows that would be easier to make on iOS with the same functionality.

    We need to see what comes out of WWDC before we start jumping to any conclusions about what it does or does not mean. One thing I am pretty sure it does mean, is even more companion apps on the Mac for popular mobile apps - how can that be anything but good?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, actually not well founded by swimboy · · Score: 1

      I understand that this is just the start of Marzipan, but the Home and News apps are just clones of the iPad apps. Even if the Marzipan framework supplies tons of extra features to make the Mac apps perform like Mac apps, it's still not going to stop 3rd parties from doing the same thing as Apple did: namely take their iPad app and run it through Marzipan to provide a sub-par experience on the Mac.

      Maybe for new apps that get developed for all platforms at the same time with Marzipan in mind will turn out well on all platforms, but I see a future that's full of crappy iPad-like apps on the mac soon after this is available to developers because it's easier to do than to re-create your UI from scratch to accommodate such different UXes.

      --
      Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
  25. I see a different future by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    it's still not going to stop 3rd parties from doing the same thing as Apple did: namely take their iPad app and run it through Marzipan to provide a sub-par experience on the Mac.

    That's kind of what Appel did but in part they were limited by Marzipan itself. Third parties (and Apple) have a lot of incentive to make Mac versions of the app better, the same way developers already add things to make iPad versions different and better than iPhone versions. It improves sales and makes people happy, so devs will mostly do what they can to make a Mac version of the app works as well as it can with a Mac...

    That is further helped by all iOS developers using Macs to develop, so they'll have plenty of opportunity to test and fix up things they don't like about the desktop version.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Get to know PERFIDIOUS JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H

  27. A cobbled together mess just like Win 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its interesting how for years Apple claimed it was best to keep a mobile OS and computer OS separate as they both could be optimal for their design and function. You got to wonder if this might have to do with Apple switching to the ARM chips to power Mac's? One would assume by 2021 they could have a ARM chip capable of replacing the Intel CPU's.

  28. The future for Apple users is iOS only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no secret that Apple makes the iPhone. The fact that they also make laptops with poor build quality is simply a side effect as they require a specific hardware development platform for their phones. Sad. Through most of the 2000's MacOS was my daily driver OS. POSIX based but with a nice GUI.

    No more. Apple has abandoned the power user. I only have MacOS for one purpose: To write apps when I have to for their silly phone platform. Which I only do if I have to (normally I target Android only when it comes to mobile). There is no future for scientific, engineering, or development on MacOS. It makes me sad but I'm not going to fight them if they don't want me as a customer.

  29. IMPERSONATING me AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HILARIOUS u ADMIT u have a registered 'luser' acct (Zontar the Mindless) & STALK me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anon https://hardware.slashdot.org/... - YOU have ISSUES, lunatic.

    See subject & that's the "best ya got"? It proves You WISH you were ME (as your POOR imitation = the sincerest form of flattery).

    * MacOS model's not done: Stop IMPERSONATING me lying & proof portfilter err's can't happen in my work https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    APK

    P.S.=> I know WHY you do it though (out of "butthurt angst", lol): I've BLOWN YOU AWAY so many times under your MANY alter-ego SOCKPUPPET /. accounts FAKENAMES you're out for "revenge" only to have EGG ON YOUR FACE yet again... apk

  30. Amazing! Bravo! What folding phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so amazing. Btw Samsung just released a folding phone. No, but single apps for devices with mice/keyboards and devices which dont even support that combination of input is revolutionary. (Actually it isnt and has been done better by microsoft)

  31. Update issues with Mac or other iOS based system by ameliared · · Score: 1

    Most of the system may not support the upgraded version of the Windows-based system due to some specific restrictions. To resolve these issues may contact with an https://applesupportnumber.net... that will guide them to overcome these situations.