Slashdot Mirror


QuadrigaCX's Crypto Accounts Were Emptied Months Before CEO's Mysterious Death, Putting Fate of $137 Million In Doubt (businessinsider.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Business Insider: Millions of dollars were missing when the CEO of a crypto exchange died without sharing the passwords to his accounts. Investigators recently cracked his laptop -- only to find the money was gone. Gerald Cotten, the founder of QuadrigaCX, was thought to have had sole access to the funds and coins exchanged on it. After his death in December, his colleagues said that about $137 million in cryptocurrency belonging to about 115,000 customers was held offline in "cold storage" and inaccessible. The case has sparked numerous theories, including that Cotten faked his own death and ran off with the cash. A court-appointed auditor, Ernst & Young, was able to crack Cotten's laptop and found that the accounts were emptied in April, eight months before his death, it said in a report last week.

The investigators said they found other issues too, such as that Quadriga kept "limited books and records" and never reported its financials. Ernst & Young also said it found 14 user accounts linked to Cotten that traded on Quadriga's exchange and withdrew cryptocurrency to addresses not tied to Quadriga. Burdened with $190 million in debt and unable to find or access the money, Quadriga filed for creditor protection in late January. A Nova Scotia court threw the company a lifeline this week, granting it a 45-day extension that prevents creditors from filing lawsuits against it until mid-April.

27 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Alt headline: by DalM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "So, you decided to invest in fake crypto-crime money and trusted it's safe keeping with a stranger..."

    1. Re:Alt headline: by DalM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, except for the fact that US Banks are typically publicly traded companies, with very serious third-party accredited accountant firms watching every penny, heavily regulated by the Federal Government and insured by the FDIC.

      But besides that small fact, exactly the same.

  2. So you don't trust banks? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    See how much better off you are converting your life savings into an online hoarding token whose value changes daily, and then entrusting your hoard to an AC on the Internet.

    There's a job waiting for you: Finance Minister of Venezuela.

    1. Re:So you don't trust banks? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      Oh no, not quite qualified. I would think with all the massive volumes of crypto coin we'd need someone used to handling orders of magnitude more money; I hereby nominate the Finance Minister of Zimbabwe

    2. Re:So you don't trust banks? by Bert64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well the whole point of crypto is that you can hold it securely yourself without having to rely on third parties, so trusting it to a third party is stupidity on the part of the user not an inherent problem of crypto.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  3. Well DUH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The rest of them are likely involved too. Since there is no way that company could run if all transactions had to be done via its CEO and the CEO leaves for India, and nobody raises a red flag, and somehow the company can continue to run without access to its funds, and no financial books, and so on.... lots of red flags with the whole operation.

    He'll be found and arrested soon enough. He won't be dead, and won't be in India. He'll be in Canada or the USA not far from his wife.

    1. Re:Well DUH! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      He doesn't really have $137M though. He has cryptocurrency that is worth around that amount, or at least was before this happened and people lost faith in it.

      Converting that into usable currency is not going to be easy, especially as the ledger is public. He will need to launder it. Obviously taking out millions is going to be a massive red flag now.

      Someone didn't think this through.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Well DUH! by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

      He *had* cryptocurrency valued at 137 million. Which means he could have grand old time ordering stuff you can buy with cryptocurrency. But as soon as he tries to convert that asset into something substantial like a house, a boat, or a car he'll be leaving traces.

      Hiding liquid assets is not a new thing. And it'd be really easy to escape the law *if you never tried to use those assets for anything but hiding*. Cryptocurrency is surely an advance from the point of view of money laundering, but it's not a panacea.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Is Cotton really dead? by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I RFTA, I see that Cotton died in India - how was this verified?

    If I were an investor, I would want DNA proof that he was dead otherwise, I would think Interpol should be notified to start looking for him.

    $137M disappears eight months before the only person with the password dies?

    It could be criminally inept business practices or just simply criminal. I would look at the latter scenario.

    1. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I RFTA, I see that Cotton died in India - how was this verified?

      Apparently they have the kind of death certificate that can be 'purchased' for $75.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      oh, just like advanced degrees and doctors diplomas over there

    3. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by quantaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I RFTA, I see that Cotton died in India - how was this verified?

      If I were an investor, I would want DNA proof that he was dead otherwise, I would think Interpol should be notified to start looking for him.

      $137M disappears eight months before the only person with the password dies?

      It could be criminally inept business practices or just simply criminal. I would look at the latter scenario.

      Yeah, the actual subject of the confirmation of his death is weirdly absent from the reporting.

      If he actually died they would have shipped the body back to Canada and had a funeral. Even if it were a family-only affair that would be pretty damn easy for a reporter to confirm and put an end to all the speculation.

      The only article I've seen is this which states:

      Despite a death certificate from Indian authorities and a statement of death from a Nova Scotia funeral home, an Indian police document giving permission to Robertson to transport Cotten’s body back to Canada, and confirmation from the hospital in which Cotten died about the circumstances surrounding his death, many of Quadriga’s users refuse to believe he is actually dead.

      So if they had permission to transport the body back to Canada then where's the funeral or at least the Canadian funeral home who cremated it?

      I'm not one for conspiracy theories... but I'm inclined to believe he's still alive.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by lazarus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard from a reliable source that Cotten is actually Cowboy Neil and that he and Malda have been seen drunk with prostitutes in Macau.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    5. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      I'm not one for conspiracy theories... but I'm inclined to believe he's still alive.

      Ditto that. All of the evidence of his death are things that could easily be staged with 8 months and $137 million to work with. If this had all occurred in Canada I would be suspicious. The fact that most of it occurred in India certainly makes it look more suspicious.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    6. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      How would a "DNA proof" that he was dead even look like? If he was cremated (which is perfectly legal), then there would be no DNA. Basically the death certificate is what you get and it is legal proof, that is just how things are set up.

      Also, it is quite possible the money is gone. Stealing $137M is pretty gutsy. However doing speculation with it and losing it all is a lot less so and has been done before. The current obvious cover story could then just be a desperate attempt to hide what has happened, not actual theft.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re: Is Cotton really dead? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bold move Cotton, let's see if it pays off

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Probably he paid some bum with a similar body type to break into his house and kill him so his family could collect the insurance money, but then killed the bum instead and faked a car crash to burn up the body. Luckily the bum did not turn out to be an undercover investigative reporter.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    9. Re:Is Cotton really dead? by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Am I missing something?

      So if they had permission to transport the body back to Canada then where's the funeral or at least the Canadian funeral home who cremated it?

      Despite a death certificate from Indian authorities and a statement of death from a Nova Scotia funeral home

      Are you saying there should also be a certificate of cremation or burial that is publicly available in Canada? I don't know how the system works there.

      For $137 million you don't need a certificate to properly investigate. A reporter can just go down and talk to someone at the funeral home to see if there was a body, and I'm sure there's investors with the cash and motive to hire a PI or Law Firm that can do the same.

      Did the funeral home get handed an urn, an Indian Death Certificate, hold a private service, and based their statement on that. Or did they actually see and prepare the body?

      --
      I stole this Sig
  5. Making Bank Robbery Easier! by kenwd0elq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that the primary function of cryto-currencies is to make bank robberies easier to do and more difficult to trace.

  6. Cold storage does not imply balances are hidden by phitar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can someone explain how the 8 months old "withdrawal" is only seen now and required hacking the computer.
    Isn't the point of the blockchain you can trace (except through mixers or specific ZKP systems) transactions precisely because every node holds an exact and full copy of the ledger of transactions?
    The only thing hacking the computer could provide is private keys to actually transfer value out of those wallets but the balance should have been public.

    1. Re:Cold storage does not imply balances are hidden by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      The whole blockchain is massive (around 200GB now) and you can obfuscate transfers a lot. Especially if you do bitcoin/ethereum conversions. The theft will not be immediately apparent.

  7. Theory: here's where the money went by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    So you might be wondering how does one make $115 Million just vanish. First I'll assume they already have ruled out the obvious that it's just spent on lavish lifestyles or sitting in the accounts of the executives.

    So where did it go? I speculate it never existed. How? Well imagine this, someone invests $1000 in the exchange when bitcoin is $1/coin. The exchange runner, steals all of it, but continues to tell the client that they own 1000 bitcoins. The the price of bit coin goes up 1000 fold. That 1000 coins now shows as a deposit worth $1million. If they withdraw some of it, well in the usual Ponzi fashion that money comes from the new deposits not from held funds since they don't exist.

    That is there is nothing backing that $1 miillion dollars aside from the $1000 that was stolen. the $1000 did not appreciate because it wasn't ever converted to bitcoin.

    So my guess is that some of this does exist in the accounts of the corrupt execs, but most of it doesn't exist at all. it's just $115M on paper, not in any account anywhere. Not $115 million stolen, its tens of thousands or hundreds stolen. If they go looking for these smaller amounts they may find some of it in boats and homes.

    The interesting thing is what happens next. Clawbacks. If anyone cashed out of the exchange and it indeed was a pnozi operations then the bankruptcy lawyers will try to claw back the money from the people who unwittingly received a profit because they had the good luck to cash out. Now bad luck.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  8. Re:Theory: here's where the money went by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's the relevant part of the summary:

    Ernst & Young also said it found 14 user accounts linked to Cotten that traded on Quadriga's exchange and withdrew cryptocurrency to addresses not tied to Quadriga.

    It seems it should be easy to tell from the public blockchain where the coins were transferred to, how many, and when....

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  9. Re:This just proves by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    No. While cryptocurrency is fools gold this proves nothing of the sort.

    All this proves if you give all your money to some shady unregulated 3rd party there's a risk you may lose it.

  10. Re:She identified the body by _merlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forged death certificates are fairly easy to get in India and not particularly expensive - might not've even got a real doctor, just a professional document forger. The thing is in India, record-keeping can be quite poor and sometimes the easiest way to get a document is just to get a forgery. A guy I knew was applying for a security clearance in Australia and needed a birth certificate. He'd somehow lost or damaged it, and the hospital where he was born had burned down with all its records, so he couldn't get a replacement. His dad went to a professional forger, gave him all the details, and got a convincing replacement. Aus DFAT accepted it without issues and he got his clearance. In this case there was no falsified information involved, but I imagine most forgers wouldn't bother to verify the information at all.

  11. Re:Theory: here's where the money went by skegg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thanks for mentioning the term "clawback" in this context; I learnt something interesting tonight.

    For anyone else interested, a couple of articles that go into further detail:

    Clawback Lawsuits on Rise in Aftermath of Ponzi Schemes
    Ponzi Scheme Victims May Owe Triple Damages For Usury In Clawback Lawsuits - A New Tool In Ponzi Scheme Litigation?

  12. Re: Alt headline:Jews did 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You lame conspiracy theorists are always missing the obvious. There were FOUR airplanes hijacked, not just TWO. Two of them were crashed into buildings in NYC, yes, but that was just a distraction from the real goal, and that has worked to fool all of the clueless people willing to bite at the first worm dangling in front of them. One plane crashed into the Pentagon, but that was also a DISTRACTION. Everybody forgets about the FOURTH AIRPLANE. That airplane crashed into a farm field. Yes, a FARM FIELD, full of unharvested crops that were quickly DECLINING in VALUE. Clearly, the entire scheme was planned by the FARMER to collect insurance payments for his ruined CROPS!!! Why does nobody but me see this?