Slashdot Mirror


Russia Blocks Encrypted Email Provider ProtonMail (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Russia has told internet providers to enforce a block against encrypted email provider ProtonMail, the company's chief has confirmed. The block was ordered by the state Federal Security Service, formerly the KGB, according to a Russian-language blog, which obtained and published the order after the agency accused the company and several other email providers of facilitating bomb threats. Several anonymous bomb threats were sent by email to police in late January, forcing several schools and government buildings to evacuate.

In all, 26 internet addresses were blocked by the order, including several servers used to scramble the final connection for users of Tor, an anonymity network popular for circumventing censorship. Internet providers were told to implement the block "immediately," using a technique known as BGP blackholing, a way that tells internet routers to simply throw away internet traffic rather than routing it to its destination. But the company says while the site still loads, users cannot send or receive email.
The way the KGB blocked ProtonMail is "particularly sneaky," ProtonMail chief executive Andy Yen said. "ProtonMail is not blocked in the normal way, it's actually a bit more subtle. They are blocking access to ProtonMail mail servers. So Mail.ru -- and most other Russian mail servers -- for example, is no longer able to deliver email to ProtonMail, but a Russian user has no problem getting to their inbox."

"That's because the two ProtonMail servers listed by the order are its back-end mail delivery servers, rather than the front-end website that runs on a different system," adds TechCrunch.

98 comments

  1. It's OK. by DogDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's OK. Putin said it was fine. He's the best!

    - Donnie

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And his dick tastes fucking GREAT AGAIN! Unrelated, I just feel like we should undo the Magnitsky Act. You know, orphans and shit, whatever right? -Javanka

    2. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Let me help you with that, your money looks so dirty... why not help yourself to a 50 million dollar condo in Florida or some shit, right? We're all mobsters here, am I right? No collusion! Loool!"

    3. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Donnie is too busy sucking Putin's tiny wee wee 24 x 7 x 365.

    4. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever, but first, they should block creimer's unencrypted UA-Videos and make the whole planet a favor but no, they let themselves being put asleep by creimer and his 10000+ stupid DMCA requests.

    5. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK. Putin said it was fine. He's the best!

      - Donnie

      It's obvious we can't trust Putin, and that won't change. It's also obvious that you can't assume you can trust your own government, regardless of which government it is. You surely can't trust Facebook and such as information sources. Major reputable sources are better, but too easy to drown out in the noise, for some at least.

      I want to see audio, video, and camera devices, and anything else relevant to digitally sign everything with GPS information and anything else relevant. Perhaps a device is permanently linked against a person cryptographically once bought and to keep it usable you have to continue to pay a small fee, just enough to keep verifying your identity. I.E. 1 dollar a year or something.

      Basically it today's day and age we need to be able to prove evidence is accurate and unmodified. For instance, the access Hollywood tape should have, ideally, had cryptographically secure metadata indicating who taped it, where they were at, based on last valid GPS and maybe a quick scan of bluetooth and wireless information in the area, or some other identifiers. This sounds draconian, but then I think anything short of draconian may be insufficient in the war on truth.

    6. Re: It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      That is precisely what Google is doing. Their collection of user location, activity at that location, preferences towards what types of things likely to be bought or politics likely to be embraced isn't to make the world a more secure and truthful place. It's to sell you toothpaste before you run out....

      Kennedy was wrong. We should fear more than fear itself. We should fear the idiots building world destroying new technology because they are too stupid or too greedy....or both....to see how it could possibly be used to negatively impact the world.

      ffs

    7. Re:It's OK. by BeauHD++(5555555) · · Score: 0

      Point 1: WE are doing are best effort's to keep Mr. Reimer under control. It is a group effort between US and YOU. We blocked him, we banned him, but whatever we do he keeps popping up and so do his "terrorist sleeper cell" accounts to promote his actually somewhat successful and enlightening YouTube channel. It is a pretty cool channel and we will do whatever we can to keep it from taking off because we really could care less about the guy. So whever you see him, be sure to let us know so we can keep him subverted.

      Point 2: We do not have KGB Putin under control which means we also do not have Kremlin Drumpf under control. We know this guy got into power by being hacked into place like a chess piece that was 3D printed to have different heads you could rotate when the opposing player isn't looking. From one angle, he is a PAWN (which he really is IRL) but from another angle he is a bishop, yet another angle he is a duke, and a knight, and so on. So Putin no joke hacked into Americans, reprogrammed the weak minded so to say, and then pulled ye olden "switch-a-roo". Which is pretty sick in my book if you think about it. TRUMP was sold on the "hope & change" fake news pedaled off and then backstabbed the people that voted for him. I feel sorry for the people that were hacked into, we need to have some kind of comprehensive test where people likely to make bad decisions have to be able to read and comprehend basic stuff, the tables would definitely be turned then. But we probably can't even get that far since Putin *will* use his KGB leverage once again and keep such democracy from happening. Any ideas?

      What we need in a fair election is foreign metaling to not happen, if Russia can block protonmail, we should be able to block Russia which requires a kill switch around Russia to keep them from cyberattacking us during the election. We need to think outside the box on this one. Maybe hold a UN summit in the US and capture Putin then and there, throw him and TRUMP in prison at the same time and make Putin confess to the world about what he did and then make TRUMP confess or at least acknowledge that he is a KGB cyber enabled spy who may get his "nightly programming" thru his Russian wife memorizing him until he does her Soviet Bidding.

      With the stuff uncovered (assuming they continue to make it hard for Mueller to do his job and find the *real* dirt to get him out of office) we can go in and basically take the TRUMP SWAMP out of the white house and kick them onto the curb with their belongings like an evicted felon not paying his rent. It is like a frying pan that has some melted plastic and old burnt on food. Don't even bother cleaning that frying pan. Take it off the stove, hand it to some homeless gentleperson to recycle, and buy a new better frying pan to give the world a better start and a true way back to democracy.

      S beauhd E
      E beauhd D
      N BeauHD I
      I BeauHD T
      O beauhd O
      R beauhd R

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what Libtards consider a valuable use of their time.

    9. Re: It's OK. by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Kennedy was wrong. We should fear more than fear itself. We should fear the idiots building world destroying new technology because they are too stupid or too greedy....or both....to see how it could possibly be used to negatively impact the world.

      That was Roosevelt, not Kennedy. FFS.

      And the same exact argument was made against the atom bomb.

      We should not fear "the idiots building world destroying new technology." Engage them. Or don't use their services. Or educate people as to their dangers.

      Fearing them implies one will cower and do nothing. Are you a coward?

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    10. Re:It's OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      orango men not good!

  2. that seems dumb by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    "ProtonMail is not blocked in the normal way, it's actually a bit more subtle. They are blocking access to ProtonMail mail servers. So Mail.ru -- and most other Russian mail servers -- for example, is no longer able to deliver email to ProtonMail, but a Russian user has no problem getting to their inbox."

    So, basically, Russians can still send and recieve encrypted email no problem .... they just can't send it to Russian mail servers.

    Wtf is the point of that? Trying to drive their own email providers out of business? Or is it just a really silly oversight?

    1. Re:that seems dumb by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      The point is, of course, to attack the weakest link first, just like in the West, the authorities dealt with the "IP theft" service providers first, because it is a lot easier, as they are public, and on their own.

      What will happen is that the Russians who don't care about encryption (the majority) will move on to government-sanctioned providers who work. The ability of the rest are not a concern for the Russian government. They will either move to a more "personal" solution, which will make them easier to identify and pressure, or give up, which I presume is also fine.

    2. Re:that seems dumb by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 2

      It was Putin who inserted all these commas, I swear.

    3. Re:that seems dumb by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'Wtf is the point of that?"
      What can Russia do about encrypted providers well out side any network that can be seen?
      Send over an internationally accepted court request and wait for a real ip to be uncovered and sent back?
      Ask police in another nation to investigate? What other nation?
      Find the nation with that ip range and ask police to investigate?
      The really simple way around this is to make the person change email providers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see the semi-colonels.

      https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/russia-is-about-to-be-isolated-from-the-internet-its-all-part-of-preparations-for-war/news-story/e3232395041286630fbd08cb10965efc

      https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12203126

      https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001431538.pdf

      https://nationalinterest.org/feature/russias-cold-war-plan-crush-france-7-days-17042

    5. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not everything is about you.

      A lot of Russias "external" politics is just the internal politics leaking.
      If Putin retires he will be murdered and his assets taken by someone else.
      He has also bled the country dry so he needs to constantly deflect and project.
      The war in Ukraine wasn't caused by some international conflict, it was just that Putin needed an external enemy to unite against.

      His opposition being able to communicate freely is a problem for him. That is why he is working to make Russian internet more like the Chinese one.
      He wants to limit outside communication so that Russians don't get too much news and ideas from the west and he wants to make sure that people who are in Russia can't communicate without him listening in.

      If you want to send encrypted e-mails to your buddies then fine.
      Heck, you can even scheme about murdering Putin if you want to, he doesn't care. You aren't a threat to him.

    6. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My god the clue was staring us in the face the whole time!

      Putin....Put in. As in he puts in commas

    7. Re:that seems dumb by jon3k · · Score: 1

      If Putin retires he will be murdered and his assets taken by someone else.

      Solution is simple. First, you find a successor. Someone who you generally trust from your inner circle. Then, you enter into a highly illegal act with this person, covertly. Both of you retain evidence of this event. Now you retire. If anything happens to you or your family, the information is released publicly. Then, you give your successor no good reason to go after you. When you can, you offer public support for them, but basically just lay low and enjoy retirement. Nothing to gain from killing you and lots to lose.

      I didn't make this up, it was the same process Yeltsin used with Putin.

    8. Re:that seems dumb by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      The think the Russians can point to a lot of counterfactual experience where this didn't work so well. They managed to take down Beria in spite of all his power and influence, Khruschev lived as a virtual prisoner after being deposed.

      The best retirement plan is probably negotiating some kind of political asylum in a third country. Build a giant condo project in Brazil under some kind of corporate front, and then move into the top 5 floors as some kind of high-rise secure compound. Cut a deal with the host country to stay put and out of politics completely.

      You're still a virtual prisoner, but at least in a cell of your own construction.

    9. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, Russians can still send and recieve encrypted email no problem .... they just can't send it to Russian mail servers.

      Wtf is the point of that? Trying to drive their own email providers out of business? Or is it just a really silly oversight?

      You can't send a bomb threat to the Russia government (or schools, etc.) using the encrypted email.

    10. Re: that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has many consequences. One your own email cannot receive mail from your non-technucal friends, so you'll be driven to have multiple emails that cannot communicate. This effectively creates more spying on your communications than blocking protonmail from being connected to on the client end, which could be done by using a VPN to bypass (such as ProtonVPN, ironically).

      This also prevents western users who use protonmail exclusively (a sign of government distrust) from contacting Russian citizens, preventing a decent chunk of random anti-Putin messages from getting through.

      On the flipside, this prevents Russian mail providers from sending messages to protonmail which means if you don't contact people in Russia your spam/phishing/scam mails from non-FSB Russia will decrease unless they are bypassing these mechanisms, but not all scammers are very bright.

    11. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not blame Putin for what a Canadian-American Shatner would do, comrade!

    12. Re:that seems dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are Protonmail users, you can give it for granted that they *do* care about encryption.

    13. Re:that seems dumb by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Such a commanist thing to do!

  3. The way the KGB blocked? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Is it still 1991?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The way the KGB blocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The network never evolved. We just added abstraction layers on top of it in the guise of new technology.

    2. Re:The way the KGB blocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it still 1991?

      Why, because they blocked port 25 from the protonmail servers?
      That seems like the correct way to prevent them sending you mail.

    3. Re:The way the KGB blocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it still 1991?

      No, but we're obviously still using it's technology. Perhaps we can stop pretending TCP/IP doesn't exist anymore, especially since we can't manage to evolve past v4.

    4. Re:The way the KGB blocked? by mattOzan · · Score: 1

      The way the KGB blocked? Is it still 1991?

      They meant "the former KGB," now the Federal Security Service, or FSB. The KGB ceased to exist, at least in name, in 1991.

    5. Re:The way the KGB blocked? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      De jure, no.

      De facto -- yes, and they're back with a brutal vengeance. They've effectively taken over Russia in conjunction with the Russian mafia to create a monstrous intelligence-gangster state, the likes the world has never seen.

  4. Email is just a bad protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the open protocols (web, email, news) are relics from the internet's academic roots.
    We're going to need new protocols hardened against increasingly illiberal western states. ...Secure open protocols ...Widely adopted

    Yeah, the internet is fucking toast. It was nice while it lasted.

    1. Re: Email is just a bad protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never going to happen. Ever. Any new protocol will have to be approved by authorities because terrorism, the chilÄren, or terrorist children.

    2. Re: Email is just a bad protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code is law.

    3. Re: Email is just a bad protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code has to be accepted and adopted to be effective. You could write the best replacement imaginable but if people don't realize, care, or like it the code doesn't become "law" it becomes irrelevant or an academic endeavour.

  5. tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tor, an anonymity network popular for circumventing censorship.

    LOL. come on guys, at least be realistic, Tor is for hiding your identity, it can also be used to circumvent censorship but that is hardly the common use.

    1. Re:tor by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      FBI is not stopped by anonymous communication attempts.
      Russia can send formal request to FBI about its success when needing to uncover layers of proxy communication.
      FBI can give name of company they use.
      Russia contacts same company and gets same support deal.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey comrade, you're dropping your articles again! Back to the IRA training gulag for you.

      BTW, did you get one of those personalized messages from the USA?

    3. Re:tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relations between the United States and Russia have now reached lows not seen since the end of the first Cold War. The Russians are chaffing under the economic consequences of increasingly severe US sanctions, including sanctions designed to single out powerful individuals in Putin's inner circles, to which Putin has responded by whipping up nationalist feelings and engaging in military adventures overseas. The Russians have also stepped up and continued their attacks on recent US elections and are now trading cyber attacks with the United States, including a new US salvo that knocked the IRA offline for a time. The next steps will probably be cyber attacks on dams, power grids or other infrastructure targets. The shooting hasn't started yet, but that's definitely the direction we're headed. Under these circumstances, I highly doubt that Russian law enforcement would even return FBI phone calls and let's not forget that the FBI is still in political hot water in the United States. The Democrats are still angry about the ill-timed Clinton email leaks from the Anthony Weiner investigation on the eve of the 2016 presidential election and are aggressively investigating Russian influence, including FBI counter-intelligence failures. From the Republican side, President Trump has already fired the FBI director once and rails constantly against Robert Mueller, seeking to undermine his investigation. If word leaked out that the FBI was in communications with Russian state police it would further undermine the independence and authority of the agency. The FBI would be well advised at this point to avoid anything that might be seen as fraternizing with the Russians.

  6. Cool, I could go to Russia or China then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since I have an unlimited number of backdoored cipher & hashing algorithms, and these governments would actually value my work.

    Then we just stage some stunt claiming that NSA has backdoored RSA, etc. NIST ciphers and hashes -- or simply demonstrate the proof that prime numbers leave signatures of their harmonic footprint in the modulo bit field, and all such crypto is now useless. And then introduce a new cipher standard with new backdoors in place. Then all the plebs can go back to thinking their shit is secure -- like they do now, since they don't know the trick of how prime numbers were the weakness in their previous cipher standards.

    Putin has said we should place a backdoor in the encryption ciphers if it isn't too much of a burden. Today's encryption systems are all weak against some interesting tricks I know (and have been for the duration of their use), might as well be considered to have backdoors AFAICT. So put down all the bullshit arguments about "if you put in a backdoor, then bad guys will get them too". First off, you don't know shit about the surveillance system, we can find those guys before they spill the beans. Secondly, your shit is already backdoored, I mean, you even wait until NSA has tweaked (weakened / backdoored) the algorithms you use before NIST approves them and they become industry standard -- so fuck of with those pointless arguments, your shit's is fucked, and you don't care about privacy or else you'd be more interested in the use of Radar to track everything everywhere always.

  7. Snowden cut off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Doesn't the traitor Snowden use protonmail?
    Does this mean he has been cut off from the rest of the world by his overlord?

    If true, that is just funny.

  8. internet providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The foot soldiers of electronic fascism. We have to get around this shit!

  9. more than that by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Russian parliament passed new laws to punish people for 'spreading fake news' and for insulting government officials, national symbols, history, etc.

    Basically it is now illegal to do any investigative journalism based on this law because the moment you say anything about anything you can be immediately, based on a complaint from anybody actually, without any court order (no court order will be required even though in Russia courts are completely useless, bought and paid for, under complete 100% control of the government and of putin) be blocked, fined, thrown to prison.

    No court order is required and the information can (and must be) immediately blocked (by all local Russian ISPs), no court order is required and a person can be fined (there is a progressive scale of fines, repeat offenders also get higher and higher fines), no court order is required but a person can be thrown into prison.

    The only way to fight this in Russia is to completely disregard this law, however I believe many people will self censor instead.

    1. Re:more than that by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well it may have technically been legal before, but journalists have had a habit of accidentally leaping of high balconies of hotels they never even visited. The 7.62mm holes were caused when glorious agents of the <s>KGB</s>FSB valiantly tried to save them.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:more than that by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thank God we aren't falling for that "need to regulate fake news" stuff here in the West!

    3. Re:more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a law that tries to regulate "fake news" the way described above would pass constitutional muster. Also it's blatantly clear that the Russian example is about real but embarrassing news, not actual fake news.

    4. Re:more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call it Communism, call it Fascism, call it Totalitarianism... choose your adjective, but this is what modern 'control' by the state, looks like.

      Be on guard. If it can happen abroad, it can sure as hell happen in the US, under the guise of alternate descriptions and legislation.

    5. Re:more than that by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      We don't have to fight Russia. It's just going to destroy itself apparently.

    6. Re:more than that by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      bought and paid for, under complete 100% control

      Yes, when you buy something you also get control over it. Anything else is theft.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    7. Re:more than that by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      The only way to fight this in Russia is to completely disregard this law, however I believe many people will self censor instead.

      When you are thousands of miles away from any place where a law you disagree with can be enforced, it is really easy to encourage people to disregard it. When you have actual skin in the game and your own future is on the line, it becomes a totally different matter. Maybe you should instead be encouraging people to do something that you would actually be willing to do yourself if you were in their shoes.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    8. Re:more than that by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Markets are efficient. Period. If it was more efficient for someone else to own the courts then someone else would have bought them by now.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    9. Re:more than that by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Also former government aides who repeatedly fall down while intoxicated until they die of a broken neck in a Washington DC hotel room.

  10. "Donnie" has a funny way of showing that by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    "Donnie" has done a million things to piss off Russia since the election, if Donald and he were ever friends that terminated the moment he became president. Even if "Donnie" has pretended to work with Russia he obviously played them for rubes...

    Further proof that "Donnie" is the shrewdest man alive.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:"Donnie" has a funny way of showing that by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be."

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:"Donnie" has a funny way of showing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:"Donnie" has a funny way of showing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kendall would love to betray his country. Unfortunately, he just doesn't fucking matter for shit. Not even a little. Like a slimebag Drumpf traitor without any inheritance or casino wives. Sad!

  11. In Putin's Russia .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Putin's Russia, email blocks you!

  12. A Great Tribute for ProtonMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Russian intelligence services in general and Vladimir Putin in particular are no strangers to best practices of security. They have blocked ProtonMail because they know that it's cryptographically secure and they have little chance of compromising the physical security of the servers in Switzerland, which are located in a underground ex-military bunker. This should be taken as evidence that ProtonMail security is genuine and indeed a threat to authoritarian regimes everywhere.

  13. Vladimir Putin - I mean Vladamir Streisand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it when small minded dictators get lazy and raise awareness of their failing instincts to control, which always... always end up backfiring. I'm opening a new account with ProtonMail today.

    Thanks Vlad!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

  14. news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    news:
    'Russia's parliament has passed two bills outlawing "disrespect" of authorities and the spreading of what the government deems to be "fake news".
    The first ban refers to "blatant disrespect" of the state, its officials and Russian society, and repeat offenders face up to 15 days in jail. '

    Basically same assholes as usa, just different methods cause they don't need to pretend to be 'democratic' - what a joke word that is. In USA you lose your job and money related things and are isolated quickly if you talk bad about 'your boss'. Its almost like, there is 'no difference' - its only 'appearance of difference'. Assholes function the same everywhere! And they manipulate and hide behind empty words.

  15. ooga booga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    illegal to "misgender" a tranny in the uk
    j00s trying to make criticism of israhell illegal in the us
    gonna say anything about that? what would (((von mises))) say about it, cucko?

    1. Re:ooga booga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Such a lot of anti-semitism still in Russia. It's a very backward country.

    2. Re:ooga booga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the anti-slavism in the US, which is very liberal.

    3. Re:ooga booga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that we hate Slavs, we hate commies. Die commie

      It is Germany that has an ethnic hatred of Slavs. We like Slavs. If you want to send all of your Slavs over here and they agree to love America and the flag, we will love them.

      Nationalism not Ethnicism

  16. consequences by Cederic · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Proton Mail users are enjoying surprisingly lower rates of spam this morning.

    1. Re:consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marked as funny but absolutely fucking true. Russia should be black holed and VPN access blocked.

  17. Email Threats Sent to Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The block was ordered by the state Federal Security Service, formerly the KGB, according to a Russian-language blog, which obtained and published the order after the agency accused the company and several other email providers of facilitating bomb threats. Several anonymous bomb threats were sent by email to police in late January, forcing several schools and government buildings to evacuate.

    If the police were able to read the threats were those emails actually encrypted and the encryption broken by the police?

  18. Fast moving towards North Korea by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A crackdown on the open Internet in Russia continues unabated. Soon, RosKomNadzor will introduce state issued mandatory SSL certificates for opening websites and forbid all the instant messengers which sport unbreakable encryption. Yes, they failed banning Telegram but it was only because there's no law to deal with fast moving targets - Durov revamped the entire servers network and logging in process to allow the Russians to communicate past the prohibition introduced last year.

    It's the fourth such news piece in the last several months. Also most western media neglected the protests in regard to the Internet in Russia which happened just two days ago. It's still astonishing how few people participated. Looks like Putin has truly become the Tsar of The Grand Duchy of Moscow and the people are content with each atrocity he does. A dictator, a tyrant, Godfather of the Russian mafia state.

    1. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      It's still astonishing how few people participated

      Because most people don’t give a crap about privacy, or think that encryption is for criminals only. “I have nothing to hide”. And those people are often not against a little censorship either, of course only terrorism and kiddie porn at first, then regular porn, then populist agitators (or the opposition, as the case may be). Then degenerate culture. And so on. That’s not just how it works in Russia, much of Europe is the same.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Although the prevalence of embarrassing data leaks seems to be waking some people up to the importance of privacy and security...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by guacamole · · Score: 0

      Looks like Putin has truly become the Tsar of The Grand Duchy of Moscow and the people are content with each [wikipedia.org] atrocity [wikipedia.org] he [wikipedia.org] does [wikipedia.org]. A dictator, a tyrant, Godfather [wikipedia.org] of the Russian mafia state. Your linking to wikipedia articles "documenting" "Putin's atrocities" only paints you as someone who knows very little about Russia besides a few western-liberal headlines. Sorry but the victims of Al-queda-linked terrorists are not an example of Putin's atrocities. And yes, many journalists died in Russia, but that's a country with a significant history of violent crime and corruption, and a violent war/insurgency in the Caucasus all dating from pre-Putin years in 1990s. Yes, they haven't done enough to solve many of them. On the bright side, the terrorist attacks mostly stopped under Putin, becoming quite a rarity in the last decade.

    4. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Putin is just a figurehead rubberstamping all this insanity. Only dumb people need one, particular person to rally against, thus any anti-Putin propaganda is by definition exists to manipulate dumb people. Nobody with good intentions would ever use dumb and misinformed people as agent of change. It only creates more chaos. As such anti-Putin rhetoric can't be used for promoting net freedom in Russia. People who would buy it would by definition not care about Internet and other nerdery like that.

    5. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

      someone who knows very little about Russia besides a few western-liberal headlines

      Or maybe I live in this country and know a little bit more than you could imagine by reading God knows what. Have you ever been to Russia, mr. guacamole? I really doubt that. Maybe you can understand the Russian language? Also unlikely. Maybe you've got a first person account of the state of corruption, lawlessness (to be precise we have law but it mostly serve the very rich and the members of the distinct dacha housing cooperative), decay in the country? I presume no. So, what do you really know about Russia? I'm quite sure nothing really aside from what you chose to believe in.

      Have you ever watched the disclosures in regard to the inner Putin circle?

      I'll just leave you with this.

    6. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

      Also, have a look at the state of corruption in the country as seen by its own citizens. And that was in 2009. As of 2019 the situation is a even worse.

    7. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by guacamole · · Score: 1

      I called you out for your deception for making tall tale statements and then linking to a bunch of irrelevant ENGLISH wiki articles as proof but you only reply with a bunch of drivel including links to other bunch of websites, and also with pompous claims about where you live and what languages you know. Yes, we know Russia is very corrupt. We know its rank in the corruption index. This still does not justify stupid statements with a bunch of Wikipedia links that not even superficially prove what you said. I could mention but you would say I got it from google translate.

    8. Re:Fast moving towards North Korea by guacamole · · Score: 1

      I never questioned that Russia was not corrupt. Russia was corrupt for the whole of its history since the foundation by the viking nobility a thousand years ago, with perhaps the exception of a brief period of Stalin rule when a peasant was sent to GULAG for stealing a potato from state farm. That Russia is corrupt and that Putin's buddies are rich and getting richer was never a secret. After all, Putin was appointed by corruptioner-in-law and very authoritarian Mr Yeltsin (who is strangely remembered by western libel-democrats as some kind of democratic freedom fighter and reformist despite shelling his own parliament in 1993). The difference between Yeltsin and Putin was that Putin allowed only his loyalists to rob the country while Yeltsin also allowed foreigners (e.g. the well documented case of the Harvard economics professors Larry Summers and Andrei Shleifer) But the rest of your statements were complete BS.

  19. Huawei redux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a reason why to fear the Chinese and Huawei as Russia has demonstrated here. Socialist want total control over knowledge about you and yours. They don't want you to have any privacy out of fear. Socialist's fear has gripped America since 9/11 and it is causing the lose of privacy that is beyond the imagination of most people.

    Imagine this scenario: You find out that a major social company is committing a felony. While you know it so do they know that you know it because they are monitoring every persons communications. The CEO, let's call him Mikey Zuckerbreg wants to eliminate you. He knows you better than you do. He knows where you go every day by cell phone towers (only to get more precise with 5G), the location of your children all day long, what they eat and where, even what they were and the design and color of their clothes ( you bought them online or EVEN in a retail outlet store). So, Mikey says, "Grab a kid and threaten you to keep quiet". What do you do? Evil companies are bad but it gets worse.

    The governments can gain ALL of this information with a warrant. Since 9/11 a secret warrant under the FISA courts ( Socialist Americans learned this one from the Nazis and KGB). No one knows what the government has gotten about you and your family. You just disappear. Another missing child, young adult, or your parents.

    If you don't believe ANY of this is happening today you don't know China or Russia. It is real. And it is happening. By adding more information into Russia's arsenal to spy on all people of the world the less freedom we have.

  20. We need this email service dead - send bad emails! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what probably happened is that the russians that wanted the service blocked, used it to send anonymous bomb threats?

    Plausible. And with the Americans doing similar in comments (FCC net neutrality) I would not be surprised.

  21. Hypocritical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is 100% hypocritical considering 99.99% of the spam accounts created on my servers are using mail.ru and yandex accounts.

  22. KGB of all things by guacamole · · Score: 1

    Obviously, the goal here to make a link between FSB and the soviet era KGB, just in case if there are people who don't think that FSB is not evil enough. I don't understand why this is necessary considering that FSB has built itself a pretty fearsome reputation in the post-Soviet era. I think that constantly pointing out that FSB is the new KGB is stupid. For one, KGB combined both foreign and domestic intelligence functions of USSR, while FSB is primarily a domestic intelligence agency (the Russian agency for foreign intelligence is SVR and GRU). While some functions between FSB and SVR overlap, it is mostly the people inside of Russia who should fear FSB. Another major difference between soviet KGB and Russian FSB is the extent of corruption inside FSB which is rumored to be involved in all sorts of malicious activity like extortion racket, taxation racket, or protection rackets involving private businesses. There is evidence that someone inside FSB might have been involved in smuggling cocaine. (https://www.rferl.org/a/argentina-russia-cocaine-plot-suspect-extradited-from-germany-jailed-in-moscow/29399251.html) Whine many evil deeds were ascribed to the soviet KGB, the corruption and all sorts of economic side businesses were not among those.

  23. This is all the endorsement I need. by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Been thinking about getting some kind of encrypted email and move off the "normal" email providers.

    That russia banned protonmail is a good endorsement for the product. I may go with them. If a totalitarian hates it is must be good!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:This is all the endorsement I need. by jwymanm · · Score: 2

      It'd be funny if the rest of the world started using ProtonMail BECAUSE Russia blackholed themselves from it hah! Imagine seeing countries say it's the only safe mail service from Russia hacking and has their full recommendation.

    2. Re:This is all the endorsement I need. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      And imagine if Proton was actually being run by Russian operatives, who by blackholing it from their own people convinced everyone else in the world that it was secure and they all started using it, thus funneling all sensitive email through Russian hands by default. Ochen xorosho, tovarich.

  24. All countries should do the same!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, encrypted email & internet browsing are things which general public do not really need (& they are actually against common good of general public)!!!

    Because, IMHO, general public is NOT really obsessed about privacy (unlike some self-appointed "Privacy Advocates" always try to portray) & general public is actually quite okay w/ law enforcement checking their communications, when they are searching for criminal activities & people!!!

    IMHO, the people who are really want/need encrypted email & internet browsing are the people who do illegal activities!!!
    IMHO, encrypted email & internet browsing are are actually against common good of general public, because of they are protecting criminals from law enforcement!!!

    IMHO, all encrypted email & internet browsing services/websites should/must be banned, in all countries in the world, permanently!!!

    1. Re:All countries should do the same!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it, you're a ho for fascists.

      Spread your holes, comrade, the state wants to penetrate you deep and shoot their propaganda load inside you.

  25. Damn it ! by ControlsGeek · · Score: 1

    How am I gonna correspond with all those beautiful Russian brides now ??

    1. Re:Damn it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia, beautiful brides reply to you!

  26. In Russia by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Black hole mails you.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  27. typical libtard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no surprise that any contry like russia or now (thank God) the USA that tries to protect itself from radical islamic terrorists who use tools like encrypted email to attack suddenly find themselves the targets of radical leftists like you. PATHETIC. if it weresnt for hating Trump and Putin, what you losers have left?

    1. Re:typical libtard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >contry
      >weresnt
      >what you losers have left

      Can't understand you with Trump and Putin's dicks in your mouth.

  28. Tangible Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think of it this way. when you use ProtonMail, you are given warm fuzzies right in the feels that your data is somehow specially encrypted, using "trust us" propietary crytpo wrapped up with an animation of a lock closing. meanwhile, the FBI's NSL and the NSA's bulk wiretap FISA warrant for "all Tangible Things" is given to the Legal Counsel of ProtonMail, and he is not even allowed to tell anyone else at ProtonMail that It's Happening.

    but when you use Yandex or Mail.ru or any of Russia's email providers, when the FBI comes knocking, the Russian's tell the FBI to take a flying fuck off a short pier. and when NSA comes port knocking, they have to tip toe very, very cawfuwee, because if Russia notices the NSA has breached a domestic Russian email provider, that sets up NSA to get burnt by a dangle, get disinfo'd, get hacked back or worse. so NSA only stock piles its penetration access into Russia for Very Important SIGINT. your dick pix do not meet that threshold, unless your name is Jeff Bezos, so your privacy is assured because you are low hanging fruit in the grand scheme of the Intl Espionage tree.

    the choice is obvious. any American who wants to protect their own privacy would be wise to use Russian email providers and totally ignore US based email providers.

    1. Re:Tangible Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm ProtonMail is based in Switzerland.

  29. Ukraine blocks russian social sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By order of Ukrainian president, Ukraine providers block russian social networks site. Freedom of speech is censored in Ukraine. Why there are no news on that censorship?