Slashdot Mirror


Vizio Wants Next-Generation Smart TVs To Target Ads To Households (reuters.com)

Smart TV manufacturer Vizio has formed a partnership with nine media and advertising companies to develop an industry standard that will allow smart TVs to target advertisements to specific households, the companies said this week. From a report: The consortium includes major TV networks like Comcast Corp's NBCUniversal and CBS, as well as advertising technology companies like AT&T's Xandr. Addressable advertising, or targeting viewers on the household level based on their interests, has long been the goal of TV marketers. But TVs lack cookies that internet browsers use to allow ads to follow people around the web. [...] The consortium of companies, dubbed Project OAR, or Open Addressable Ready, hopes to define the technical standards for TV programmers and platforms to deliver addressable advertising on smart TVs, which are WiFi-enabled TVs with apps for services like Netflix Inc and Hulu, by the end of this year, McAfee said. Further reading: In January this year, Bill Baxter, chief technology officer of Vizio, spoke about business of data collection in an interview. He said: It's about post-purchase monetization of the TV. This is a cutthroat industry. It's a 6-percent margin industry, right? I mean, you know it's pretty ruthless. You could say it's self-inflicted, or you could say there's a greater strategy going on here, and there is. The greater strategy is I really don't need to make money off of the TV. I need to cover my cost. And then I need to make money off those TVs. They live in households for 6.9 years -- the average lifetime of a Vizio TV is 6.9 years. You would probably be amazed at the number of people come up to me saying, "I love Vizio TVs, I have one" and it's 11 years old. I'm like, "Dude, that's not even full HD, that's 720p." But they do last a long time and our strategy -- you've seen this with all of our software upgrades including AirPlay 2 and HomeKit -- is that we want to make things backward compatible to those TVs. So we're continuing to invest in those older TVs to bring them up to feature level comparison with the new TVs when there's no hardware limitation that would otherwise prevent that.

32 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Welp... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Welp... by telek83 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads... Squid + Privoxy and man in the middle yourself so you can filter the https connections too. Problem solved!

    2. Re:Welp... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads...

      Why give the television access to your network at all? The manufacturers only support a particular generation for 3-4years at most. For the vast majority of people, that television is going to be in their home significantly longer than that.

      Get a Roku, get an Apple TV, get a Fire stick - use that device to feed the shows to the flat screen.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: Welp... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody has cable any more.

      Then how do home users receive their Internet? And how do they get the bundle discount on said Internet?

    4. Re: Welp... by jpaine619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OTA television cannot have targeted ads because it's a one way transmission.

      True

      Nobody has cable any more.

      And then you went all dumb.... There are still roughly 83,000,000 households in the US that pay for either cable or IPTV. At what point did 83,000,000 (a number greater than the total population of Germany) become "nobody"? This number is declining, to be sure, but it's going to be a long, slow, and drawn out death..

    5. Re:Welp... by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 2

      I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

      You don't have to turn on the "smart" features. They are off by default.

      Also, Vizio won't be the only company doing this. Likely, they all will.

      Actually, we might pretty much have lost control of privacy. Think about, even if you trust your wifi access point, and all of your neighbors not to happily offer access to your TV that may also have a microphone and a camera, can you also trust those wifi services and such setup by cable modems and all that?

      Seriously, if a 3 letter agency wanted the camera on your new fancy TV to be something they could turn on (with a court order of course) could you even tell that it was happening?

      I use a method espoused by a white house staffer to prevent my microwave from spying on me. Piece of tape. Works wonders.

    6. Re:Welp... by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you send it back for a refund.

    7. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Then pretty soon the market will cluster around the few devices that do not do this? Sure, some people will stick with say Firestick forever, but many will say "screw this" and swap to Roku. Then if Roku does the targeted ads they'll switch to Apple, etc. The only way the targeted ads work is if the consumers don't give a shit anymore. We may be getting closer to that point but we're not at the 100% sheep level.

    8. Re: Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And a free market requires that both parties in a transaction have the necessary information to make a decision. If that doesn't exist then the market really isn't that free.

    9. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The hand of capitalism may be invisible, but you can still feel it when it slaps you.

    10. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Turn OFF the smart features and get an external box for the TV stuff. That is, treat the TV as a dumb monitor. et a Roku for less than $100 that gives you more choices than most smart TVs will. Or get a Firestick, an AppleTV, a ChomeCast, etc. This stuff is highly affordable now, they're very tiny and can easily be hidden out of sight and are not at all like last generation's large "set top boxes".

      The only worry is if the TV refuses to do anything until you configure it to be on your wifi. I doubt it will be there soon, there's still a big market for people to use TVs are dumb monitors (ie, for game consoles). If it does happen, then feed it a dummy wifi AP until it's configured then disable that (or set up a permanent trap on your router, stick in adblock, etc). If that fails to work, then move to a country that still values privacy as a civil right.

    11. Re:Welp... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      Then pretty soon the market will cluster around the few devices that do not do this? Sure, some people will stick with say Firestick forever, but many will say "screw this" and swap to Roku. Then if Roku does the targeted ads they'll switch to Apple, etc. The only way the targeted ads work is if the consumers don't give a shit anymore.

      I'm guessing that either all of your friends are geeks, or you don't get out much. I see zero sign that the majority of people will offer any more than token resistance to this kind of targeted advertising. Facebook lives, Google thrives, and corporations in general rule because most people just accept the status quo.

      We may be getting closer to that point but we're not at the 100% sheep level.

      No, we're not at 100% sheepness, but we're way north of 90%, and some would say we're well past 99%. In any case, this shit is a done deal, and most people will just suck it up, as they have with Windows 10, shitty cellular providers, and corrupt governments.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    12. Re: Welp... by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      I see another poor bastard has replied on Slashdot using an iPad.

      For goodness sakes this needs to be fixed.

    13. Re:Welp... by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      If everyone really just accepts the status quo, then streaming television would never have gotten off the ground and the cord cutters would be a very tiny minority.

      Not quite the same thing. People didn't shift to streaming because of its technological superiority, they moved to it because it allowed them to watch their desired content on their own timetable, and on mobile devices without making an additional expenditure. DVRs helped bridge the gap, but streaming gave that specific experience which regular cable TV did not...and aside from a monthly fee that costs less than most value meals at McDonald's, there was virtually no tradeoff to be had.

      The issues with targeted advertising are far less directly beneficial. The options aren't 'targeted ads' or 'no ads', it's ads either way and the question is whether those ads are for products from Microsoft or Maybelline, and that's purely a matter of principle - relatively few people will make even a single purchasing decision based on the presence or absence of a targeted ad system.

    14. Re: Welp... by fropenn · · Score: 2

      None of the mainstream candidates in the US really want to turn the US into a socialist country. That's just thrown about by those on the right to inflame their base and raise money.

      However, there is a push from some candidates for more government regulation of the free market to reign in some of the excesses, abuses, and corruption and to produce revenue to support infrastructure and social programs for those for whom the free market has failed.

      There is also a push from some candidates to move some major industries (such as healthcare) away from free market toward more socialized systems.

      This is called a "mixed economy," and is where the US already is and is where the US would remain even if healthcare is eventually socialized.

  2. FUCK YOU, Im sure by wolfheart111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I speak for ALL OF US. Nothing more to be said, you can close this thread now :)

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re: FUCK YOU, Im sure by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Informative

      That sounds like projection. You must be an Apple customer.

  3. Tight margins, huh? by Krishnoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a cutthroat industry. It's a 6-percent margin industry, right?

    I'll give you 10% extra if you replace that hardware and software with a couple additional DVI and DisplayPort adapters. You could even make it a swap-out-able module.

  4. This is why.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...my Vizio tv isn't connected to the internet, nor will it ever be, except for firmware upgrades.
    My AppleTV isn't trying to monetize me.

    1. Re:This is why.... by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      Why would you even do the firmware upgrades?

      I've had several Smart TVs because they were the only ones w/ the size/features I wanted, and none of them have ever needed a firmware update.

    2. Re: This is why.... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      The 'security' is to protect the content from you. Aka: DRM.

  5. Re:thanks but no by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

    All right! It's now a bidding war!

  6. This is satire, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, the more I read these articles the more convinced I become that I'm living in some kind of satire-based, candid-camera type show. I mean this product idea just screams DO NOT BUY ME on so many levels it simply has to be a wind-up because no sane person would honestly suggest it with a straight face.

    The idea that could something that combines the reality-dreck that passes for TV these days with targeted advertising (and I'm going to assume all the spying that goes with it)... I mean seriously, in what alternative universe is that an attractive proposition??? And then to go on and suggest that a person who has managed to score an old-fashioned, non-smart TV would want to retroactively obtain such features... the mind boggles.

  7. I want Vizio by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To go out of business.

  8. About advertisers by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone who is interested the modern advertising industry is the brain child of one Edward Bernays who deceived women into thinking that smoking was a sign of their freedom.

    I highly recommend a documentary called Century of the Self for anyone who want to see just how we got into the situation we are in now.

    For all of the things that a human beings time gets wasted on, advertising has to be the most offensive.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  9. I guess I'm on my last TV by ahodgson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is the way the industry's going, fuck'em.

  10. My nearly 4 year old vi\zio tv had 2 things going by bobstreo · · Score: 2

    for it.

      I) It was cheap at the time and my previous dumb TV had died

    2) It was dumb as dirt. HDMI ports with some CEC support.

    If this one goes, I'll probably buy a smart tv (since there aren't any choices) and toss a streaming device on it like an android TV box. Netflix, and kodi support are pretty much all I use, with the occasional chromecast from my computer. If the streaming device dies or needs to be replaced, it's usually less than $100.

    No smart TV will have any access to any Internet access. If they start putting 4G/5G sim cards in their devices, I'll be removing them as well.

    If the current prices aren't sufficient to support Vizio's profit model, they may want to rethink their business.

  11. No "Smart TV" for me until ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    No "Smart TV" for me until I can replace its entire software/firmware load with an open-source alternative.

    My family's TV watching (mostly CDs of old movies) is done using a NTSC CRT TV fed with analog video.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  12. Re:Hmm by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Netflix does not show those ads while watching shows. It basically promotes itself and shows by showing them higher up on the list and auto-playing previews when you're idle. It experimented in a small subset of the market by showing some ads before the movies start but it was not making people happy so they stopped that. But if it ends up like the crappy CBS streaming service showing ads in the middle of shows then the customers will unsubscribe in droves. People who don't mind ads are already over on Hulu.

  13. Time to.... by drew_92123 · · Score: 2

    It's time to start taking aim at CEOs..... with high powered rifles.....

  14. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I owned a Vizio 55-inch "Smart" TV. Vizio had already gotten into trouble for collecting user TV activity without properly disclosing that. I quickly realized that the "Smart" features of my Vizio were worse than what I got out of my gen. 1 Chromecast. So I disabled Vizio's "Smart" TV functions.

    But the firmware of my Vizio TV was terrible. The TV would turn itself on overnight! I would come into my living room the next morning to see the TV turned on, but the remote would not work. The few buttons on the TV including the power button would not work either. I had to pull the electrical cord to get the Vizio pos TV to turn off. This happened at least three times over two years.

    Changing channels on the Vizio "Smart" TV was slow. Much slower than my non-smart Sharp TV which I love. And since I was using an antenna, channels with weak signal would cause the Vizio "Smart" TV to strangely change to a channel across the dial (going from something like 45-3 to 15-1 without any user input). I repeatedly hid 15-1 from my channel lineup, but the Vizio would add it back repeatedly.

    I finally called Vizio's customer support. The moron from Vizio did not seem to know that channels on physical frequencies (specified in megahertz) are mapped onto logical channels (45-3 for instance). He kept talking nonsense to me. Then when I complained about the firmware problems, what was his solution??? THAT I SHOULD BUY A NEW VIZIO TV BECAUSE THE FIRMWARE ON THEIR NEW TVs WORKS BETTER! I paid Vizio for a final product, not for some piece of shit alpha TV which spies on its users.

    BTW, from the Vizio CTOs comments, 720p IS full HD, in that the original HD spec allows either 720p or 1080i. So even Vizio's CTO doesn't know what he is talking about. And no, Vizio does not support their older TVs at least not with firmware that works.

    Avoid Vizio at all costs. Vizio TVs suck.

  15. Re: No Thanks by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 2

    My Sharp BluRay player actually has a setting that allows me to block discs from accessing the network. All I see is a brief pop up that says “disc trying to access network, blocked” or some such, and then it finishes loading. Turning this option on took disc load times down dramatically because they no longer download some crappy new trailer before going to the menu.

    Now if only the menu options allowed me to override the built-in ads and skip straight to menu, I’d be happy... why consumers can’t do this on media we f’n ALREADY PAID FOR is beyond me. The only people who don’t see the FBI warning and the preloaded ads are the pirates.