Slashdot Mirror


Facebook's Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times: Federal prosecutors are conducting a criminal investigation into data deals Facebook struck with some of the world's largest technology companies (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source), intensifying scrutiny of the social media giant's business practices as it seeks to rebound from a year of scandal and setbacks. A grand jury in New York has subpoenaed records from at least two prominent makers of smartphones and other devices, according to two people who were familiar with the requests and who insisted on anonymity to discuss confidential legal matters. Both companies had entered into partnerships with Facebook, gaining broad access to the personal information of hundreds of millions of its users. The companies were among more than 150, including Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Sony, that had cut sharing deals with the world's dominant social media platform. The agreements, previously reported in The New York Times, let the companies see users' friends, contact information and other data, sometimes without consent. Facebook has phased out most of the partnerships over the past two years. "We are cooperating with investigators and take those probes seriously," a Facebook spokesman said in a statement. "We've provided public testimony, answered questions and pledged that we will continue to do so."

9 of 49 comments (clear)

  1. Who Is The Capital Behind Facebook? by dryriver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember living in a developing country when Facebook first became popular, and getting _inundated_ with daily requests to "join X on Facebook". I smelled a rat and didn't. What was frightening was the _crazy_ adoption rate of this mediocre web service - _everyone_ I knew was putting pressure on everyone else _they_ knew to also be on Facebook. People kept telling me "I can't find you on Facebook, I can't find you on Facebook". That doesn't happen without Billions of Dollars in capital behind the first push of the website. Why would millions suddenly rush to put their photo and personal data on such a simple and poorly designed website, and one with a name directly referencing "Face Indexing" or "Face Data Collection" to boot? It takes money to pull this off. LOTS of money. That money probably - even back then - came from various big industries desperate to collect as much personal data about everyone around the world as possible. Thus Facebook was not a "little Mark Zuckerberg genius startup" at all. This was a heavily industry-funded social media site from day one. And they probably got everyone's data piped to them from Day 1. Facebook _was_ about "connecting people" - but connecting them with industries who want to syphon their personal data away.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:Who Is The Capital Behind Facebook? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What was frightening was the _crazy_ adoption rate of this mediocre web service - _everyone_ I knew was putting pressure on everyone else _they_ knew to also be on Facebook. People kept telling me "I can't find you on Facebook, I can't find you on Facebook". That doesn't happen without Billions of Dollars in capital behind the first push of the website.

      You have greatly underestimated the stupidity of mankind.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Who Is The Capital Behind Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recall when it first launched, Zuckerberg's name wasn't attached to or associated with it at all, and word was the project started with InQTel money.

    3. Re:Who Is The Capital Behind Facebook? by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      I would respond, but I don't know if you're real. I can't find you on facebook.

      Why were CB radios such a big thing in the 70's.
      Why did everybody have to record every last thing they did on VCR in the 80's?
      Why were so many people putting up lame Geocities web sites in 90's?
      AOL sent out a lot of coffee table coasters, but why were so many people hip to hang out in a chat room in the 00's?

      People in general are desparate for their 15 minutes of fame, and will go to great lengths to stretch it to 15:01. Zuck happened to luck into a movement with a slightly less mediocre site than the previous starring mediocre sight, and tapped into "signalling". Remember "you can't be on it unless you're from Harvard"?

      It was the lucky happenstance of tapping into a combination of several human factors at the right time with a not completely shitty solution. Nefarious players were not necessary.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  2. Re:"Pledge"? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its why used car salesman are so highly reguarded and trusted.

    I agree with you. Not only should used car salesmen should be guarded, they should be guarded twice.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  3. Re:Impeach Zuck! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    The problem is, even if Facebook goes down another will simply take its place because people never learn.
    Internet people, doubly so.

    Or as Korg would say: "Another day, another Doug."

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  4. Re: What is News here? by ruddk · · Score: 2

    Agreed. Like “people are leaving Facebook in droves”

  5. Investigate Facebook already by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Facebook is to be investigated for a crime, it should be for using PHP.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  6. Re: What is News here? by reanjr · · Score: 2

    Ideas are a dime a dozen. Execution is what's important.