Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create the First AI-Controlled Robotic Limb That Can Learn To Walk Without Being Programmed (sciencealert.com)

schwit1 shares a report from ScienceAlert: Researchers at the University of Southern Carolina (USC) claim to have created the first AI-controlled robotic limb that can learn how to walk without being explicitly programmed to do so. The algorithm they used is inspired by real-life biology. Just like animals that can walk soon after birth, this robot can figure out how to use its animal-like tendons after only five minutes of unstructured play.

Today, most robots take months or years before they are ready to interact with the rest of the world. But with this new algorithm, the team has figured out how to make robots that can learn by simply doing. This is known in robotics as "motor babbling" because it closely mimics how babies learn to speak through trial and error. "During the babbling phase, the system will send random commands to motors and sense the joint angles," co-author Ali Marjaninejad an engineer at USC, told PC Mag. "Then, it will train the three-layer neural network to guess what commands will produce a given movement. We then start performing the task and reinforce good behavior."

23 of 39 comments (clear)

  1. Why not link to the university website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a link there: https://pt.usc.edu/2019/03/08/...

    There is no need for journalists to add another layer between us and researchers any more thanks to the internet.

    Remember playing the telephone game as a kid? It's better to get info from the horse's mouth than have it passed down and muddled through extra layers.

    1. Re: Why not link to the university website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're just waiting for the harsh screams of citation needed that will be coming soon rather than asking for a formal reference to the source.

    2. Re:Why not link to the university website? by necro81 · · Score: 2

      I'll do you one better and link directly to a PDF on arXiv.

    3. Re: Why not link to the university website? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I figured there would be more feedback. Also 4 legs? I figure the students at usc.edu might want to consider their post grad work on a machine that walks on just 2 legs. Good job kids, thumbs up emoji.

    4. Re:Why not link to the university website? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I'll do you one better and link directly to a PDF on arXiv.

      I'll do you one better: why is link directly?

  2. The Wrong Trousers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Of Wallace and Gromit fame. Now with even less penguin required.

  3. University websites make for poor clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Boring! Too many facts and stuff! And they'll be low on trackers and that sort of crud.

    C'mon, haven't you figured BeauHD, msmash, and EditorDavid are adderall-addicted millennials desperate for more clicks from other millennials? It so clearly shows in their "work".

  4. Re: Yoookay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's really *cool* with an arm trained by machine learning it doesn't have to get it exactly right. Close enough is plenty good for many tasks that do not require finesse, like crushing or walking in a general direction, etc

  5. Has the arm been improved? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3

    Dr. Strangelove had a few issues with the first generation arm.

  6. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm an embedded firmware engineer and it's so awesome to know that there is technology that will allow me to ship product with blank processors that will learn on its own without being programmed. Makes my job so much easier!

    1. Re: Awesome! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      At this point, your job is done here?

  7. Re:Not again by Shaitan · · Score: 2

    Most of the "breakthroughs" in AI are from about 20 years ago. Turns out much of what failed then failed because their neural nets were too small. Also, sometimes things work when rediscovered because the person is implementing the idea independently without the baggage of wrong ideas that seemed correct and lead people down the wrong path.

    Everything but incremental improvements "didn't really work" until one day someone figured out how to make it work. Hopefully they give appropriate credit.

  8. Not like this, here's the video by goombah99 · · Score: 1
    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  9. Origins of Groot? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    I am Groot?

  10. You know you wanna... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of a more...recreational application of this kind of software. Something that might be found on the "Silicon Wives" website, for example.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re:You know you wanna... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Just don't ever use the expression, "Jerk it off".

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  11. Re:Not again by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    it was the hype over 20 years ago, and was discarded soon after it didn't really work. It looks like the new generation is learning it all over again.

    Except now it does work.

  12. SkyNet smiles... by syn3rg · · Score: 1

    The most accurate word in TFA: "Scarily".

    --
    The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
  13. A single limb? by srl100 · · Score: 2

    Lame

  14. Video here by Megahard · · Score: 1
    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  15. University of Southern Carolina? by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Are the slashdot editors doing their jobs on the phones now, and letting autocorrect fix their typos?

  16. Torn between tropes. by Shag · · Score: 1

    1. What could possibly go wrong?
    2. And so it begins.
    3. I, for one, welcome our self-learning robotic-arm overlords.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  17. Not programmed to walk? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    It was obviously programmed to find the movements that make it walk. Is yes, it was programmed to walk.