Slashdot Mirror


Cable Lobby Seeks Better Reputation By Dropping 'Cable' From Its Name (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Cable lobbyists don't want to be called cable lobbyists anymore. The nation's top two cable industry lobby groups have both dropped the word "cable" from their names. But the lobby groups' core mission -- the fight against regulation of cable networks -- remains unchanged. The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) got things started in 2016 when it renamed itself NCTA-The Internet & Television Association, keeping the initialism but dropping the words it stood for. The group was also known as the National Cable Television Association between 1968 and 2001. The American Cable Association (ACA) is the nation's other major cable lobby. While NCTA represents the biggest companies like Comcast and Charter, the ACA represents small and mid-size cable operators. Today, the ACA announced that it is now called America's Communications Association or "ACA Connects," though the ACA's website still uses the americancable.org domain name.

"The new name reflects a leading position for the association in the fast-growing telecommunications industry, where technology is rapidly changing how information is provided to and used by consumers," the cable lobby said. "It's all about the communications and connections our members provide," said cable lobbyist Matthew Polka, who is CEO of the ACA. The "ACA Connects" moniker "explains what our association and members really do," Polka continued. "We connect, communicate, build relationships and work together with all, and that will never change."

63 comments

  1. How about replacing it with by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "sleazebag".

    1. Re: How about replacing it with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a clear sign someone is in the office. Now how about selling customers what they actually want? And without a long confusing and irritating sales pitch?

    2. Re: How about replacing it with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "sleazebag" is the gatekeeper to your community, asshole! No one forms relationships except through ME! I provide the WORLD to you and this is the treatment I get?

  2. Molester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Child Molesters are trying to get a better reputation by dropping "Child" from their names.

    1. Re:Molester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mole Station Nursery

    2. Re: Molester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh let it go already

  3. The smell will tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pig still smells like a pig.

  4. a turd by any other name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a turd by any other name would smell just a crappy.

  5. Stop calling them pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's damaging to their reputation....

    (See how stupid you people sound?)

    (bonus points: captcha= minors)

  6. No problem by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    The name change won't prevent from carrying on giving them the middle finger.

    1. Re:No problem by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

      The new name is "the finger". It's still the same finger, but it just doesn't want to me known as "middle" anymore.

  7. Here's how to improve your reputation by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Let's take the example of "Comcast".

    Will calling it something besides a cable company change the reputation? No.

    So what do you do?

    It's pretty simple. Make a new company "FutureCast", just something with a better name to start with. Pretend it's a new company.

    Now, take your employees that are actually good, transfer them all to FutureCast. Provide good quality commercial cable modems for internet only, and rent those out instead of your own crappy hardware. Prioritize network traffic over the Comcast network for FutureCast customers.

    So you have customers that interact with a company that doesn't rent overpriced garbage boxes, delivers what people actually want which is internet only for a reasonable price without pushing extra packages, and actually has employees that are not like playing Service Russian Roulette any time you have to deal with them. Who would NOT love that company?

    What above older Comcast customers you ask? Well, how would they even notice a drop in service quality...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Here's how to improve your reputation by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Funny you used them as an example -- all the NCTA needs to do is lose any associations with 'Comcast' and their reputation would improve immediately.

    2. Re: Here's how to improve your reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hurry the hell up. What's stopping them?

    3. Re:Here's how to improve your reputation by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the actual strategy is to invent a new name. Announce it like it's a buyout rather than a rebranding. Put stickers with the new name at the top of all of the old documents. Raise prices 5% and BINGO!

      Under no circumstances improve any product or service. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    4. Re:Here's how to improve your reputation by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      They already did it. It is called "Xfinity". Comcast is just the name of the parent company.

  8. Connects not much better by xack · · Score: 1

    After the whole BitCONNNEEEECCCCTTTT meme.

  9. Stupid, but very effective strategy by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    For example, here in Brazil, most political parties removed the "Partido" from it's name, because "parties" was related to corruption. Another example is the change from "TelefÃnica" to "Vivo" in phone land operator on the biggest state here, São Paulo, to avoid impact of the damages already done with the prior name (but the economical group behind it still the same)...

    1. Re:Stupid, but very effective strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying - just change the name and people forget everything. amazing - its almost like those calling the people 'dumb sheep' are onto something here.

  10. So they do give a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:So they do give a fuck? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "See Figure 1!"

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. NCTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joke from Washington insiders is that NCTA stands for "Not Called That Anymore."

    1. Re:NCTA by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      Never Caring To Appease, or
      New Customers Treated Atrociously

  12. Um... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    If they are changing the name because of some sort of negative association with cable, wires, or whatever; then I suppose I can see it.

    But if it's because of the shitty reputation that the cable companies have gotten due to the way they operate, then this is just stupid. If they want to be thought of in a more positive way, then perhaps they should stop being douche bags and treating their customers the way they have been for the last couple of decades.

    But I guess a name change is easy, while actually doing something meaningful is probably against the very fiber of their being.

  13. Not the right strategy by surfdaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't drop "cable" from your name, drop the shit from your game.

    1. Re:Not the right strategy by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      They should change their name to "Law-buying Lobbyists", or "Government-bribing Lobbyists". That way it's crystal clear who they are.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Not the right strategy by budsetr · · Score: 1

      Howabout: Customer Raping Assholes

    3. Re:Not the right strategy by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can help me understand what lobbying is. Here's my current understanding:

      Lobbyists are independent contractors that are hired by corporations in order to bribe public officials in order to pass laws that help the company succeed in whatever current economic environment exists.

      Are you referring to citizens as customers??

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    4. Re:Not the right strategy by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That might actually take work, though. Dropping cable from their name is easy. Say what you will about cable companies, but they're never ones to make a hard fix when there's an easy band-aid that can be applied.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Not the right strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiight, cause they will totally do this. Just like everyone does this, right?

      Wake the fuck up, sweet summer child and welcome your lobbyist overlords.

  14. "Cable" is bad? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    In an effort to upgrade their image, they're renaming themselves "the dead baby lobby"?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  15. BREAKING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zodiac Killer to revamp his reputation by dropping Killer from his moniker.

    1. Re:BREAKING by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Zodiac Killer to revamp his reputation by dropping Killer from his moniker.

      Probably better than his real name. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:BREAKING by sjames · · Score: 1

      I find it hysterical that the Wikipedia article has to go out of it's way in the summary section to point out that he cannot actually be the Zodiac Killer.

  16. Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite clever... Remove "Cable" and just call yourself "Lobby". The sky is the limit!

    1. Re: Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Obama was never influenced by corporate lobbyists. Real news would have informed us! LOL

  17. It worked for Satan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now known as Donald J Trump.

  18. In seemingly related news ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Nathan Summers will be dropping "Cable" from his name and will now be known as "".

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  19. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just "Lobby" now, eh?

    That's bound to cause a bit of confusion. Mind if we call you Bruce?

  20. Lipstick on a pig by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Lipstick on a pig seems an appropriate and accurate analogy.

  21. So the Cable Guy... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    ...is now just a guy?

    1. Re:So the Cable Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it'll freak out the customers. There's a guy here that says he's going to fix my. My what?

  22. You Mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be just called "lobby", wont that be a bit confusing? for us consumers anyway :)

  23. Larry the Guy by tepples · · Score: 1

    So do we end up with Larry the Guy, Nathan the Guy, and Chip the Guy?

    1. Re:Larry the Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like where you are going there. What if we also cut their "cords?" Larry the, Nathan the, ...

  24. Time for a change by hedge00 · · Score: 1

    'Cable' is a generic and outdated term to describe pay TV. Now we've got IPTV and the method of delivery is inconsequential. What utility doesn't come through a cable or pipe?

    1. Re:Time for a change by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Well, sewer is a utility and it doesn't come through a pipe (unless you have a serious backup). It generally goes OUT a pipe.

  25. Funny New Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . The National & Telecommunications Association (NTA) has a funny ring to it.

  26. crypsis, the j00ish way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crypsis, the j00ish way

  27. Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If "The Cable Lobby" drops the "Cable" from it's name, it will just be "The Lobby, and people will start hanging out in it waiting for their appointed time, or to check in or check out, or meet with someone, or just take shelter in it to stay out of the heat, cold, rain, snow, etc. ...

    Also, they will have to start stocking copies of USA Today.

  28. Can't put lipstick on a pig by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    It is what it is.

  29. George and Coco agree at last by epine · · Score: 1

    At fifty you have the face you deserve.
            — George Orwell and Coco Chanel split the wishbone

    George: Well, I wrote an entire book about scalpels—scalpels taken to the human soul. And then Gilliam came along and made my book's metaphor physical, too, so nyah-nyah.

    Coco: Oh come on, George, I have seventeen patents on alpha hydroxyl acid. And you can guess the rest ... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so it truly behooves the beheld to take matters into her own sweet little hands.

    [A blood-curdling scream cuts the conversation short.]

    George: By George, what was that?

    Coco: Oh, didn't you see? The Cable Guy ... he staggered into the men's room with a dermatological razor blade the size of Crocodile Dundee's—

    George:don't say it, my darling, I can indeed guess the rest.

  30. Always wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they don't want to be associated with bad rep, just changing the name won't help, it will just confuse people at first and then their bad reputation will be back at their new name again...
    Why not change a bit and do things less shady things? Maybe that will help their public image...I never thought they even cared about that.

    1. Re:Always wrong? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      >Why not change a bit and do things less shady things?

      Because that would harm profit margins, while a name change only requires changing the stationary.

      Besides, in this case it's a name very few people know - would you have recognized what NCTA was without the long name?

      But spell it out? People hear about the latest action by the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, they know right away they're getting screwed harder. The Internet & Television Association though? Now, that could be anybody, right?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Always wrong? by Slick_W1lly · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that?

      D'you remember what Arthur Anderson changed their name to after their accounting scandal debacle re: Enron?

      I 'vaguely' remember. Some bulltshit floaty-woaty fairy name or something or other beginning with A.
      I have to look it up.. I might remember if I saw it, but I can't immediately bring it to mind when asked.

      PS: I looked it up. It's Accenture.

  31. Admission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the cable...er, communications industry now tacitly admits that their services suck so badly that they are ashamed of being called cable companies. F*ck them all.

  32. Sounds to me by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like the cable lobby is cutting the cord....

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  33. LOL! by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    SO stupid! It won't help. Stop bending over customers you idiots.

  34. Telcos suck by gavron · · Score: 1

    The telcos and the cablecos are the duoply that keeps on taking. No matter where you live in the US you have a choice of ONE built-in telco and ONE built-in cableco.

    Karl Bode of Arstechnica incorrectly calls these ISPs, but they are not ISPs. They are legacy providers of wireline telephony and wireline cable tv ("Community Access TeleVision or CATV").

    It's sad when the tech writers can't get the tech right. It's sad when the companies can't provide service right. And now their lobbyist arms are changing names to hide their true motives.

    We need to get TRUE COMPETITION in fiber and copper providers. Screw the cable lobby. Screw the telco lobby. Screw people who call everyone ISPs when they're not. COMPETITION and MULTIPLE OPTIONS IN EVERY HOME is the answer.

    Europe, despite being backward about copyright law and about to pass chapter 13 in their "down with google" endeavors at least have lower prices and better options.

    E

    1. Re:Telcos suck by Immerman · · Score: 1

      >they are not ISPs. They are legacy providers of wireline telephony and wireline cable tv

      Of course they are - they're the primary Providers of Internet Service in the U.S.

      It's not their original business, and in the case of cable companies, perhaps still not their primary one. And their history gives them some substantial regulatory advantages over the competition, but to deny that they provide internet service is foolish.

      Meanwhile, broad competition in physical infrastructure is a nightmare - both in terms of infrastructure complexity and financial cost.

      Offhand, I only see one way that we could sustainably decouple the physical infrastructure from ISP services: Forbid the owners/maintainers of physical infrastructure from selling any services to the public. You have one or two physical infrastructure companies servicing a region, and the ISPs pay them reasonable and non-discriminatory rates for access to individual homes.

      That at least ensures that the groups with a stranglehold on physical infrastructure are doing business with a number of large, competitive companies that are all trying to drive down the cost of access to attract customers, rather than basically powerless consumers. It's not perfect, but at least it consolidates consumer purchasing power enough to have negotiating clout. Comcast doesn't care much if you threaten to switch to the competition - maybe they'll offer you a fresh introductory-rate "discount" to stay on board, but either way it doesn't really effect their bottom line. But they would care immensely if SomeISP threatened to start moving their 100,000 customers to the competition.

      Actually, I think the basic idea has a lot more potential than just ISPs - lets break up the power companies into grid and production - make sure the grid providers don't have a vested incentive in discouraging solar, etc. power, beyond the legitimate difficulties such sporadic power sources create.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  35. Wong summary title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead it could be.
    Cable lobby seeks to avoid reputation/accountability/reality by...

    I wonder who cares?
    Perhaps it looks better on the member's list of supporters.

  36. speaking about renaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about rename 'lobbyist' to 'bribing criminal' so there will be less confusion about the activity. Oh right, i forgot.. confusion is good, otherwise too many suckers might wake up and call you out on your shit.

  37. New name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they'll just be known as "Lobby"