Slashdot Mirror


Airbnb Has a Hidden-Camera Problem (theatlantic.com)

Airbnb says it's cracking down on hosts who record guests. But is it doing enough? From a report: Airbnb's rules allow cameras outdoors and in living rooms and common areas, but never in bathrooms or anywhere guests plan to sleep, including rooms with foldout beds. Starting in early 2018, Airbnb added another layer of disclosure: If hosts indicate they have cameras anywhere on their property, guests receive a pop-up informing them where the cameras are located and where they are aimed. To book the property, the guests must click "agree," indicating that they're aware of the cameras and consent to being filmed.

Of course, hosts have plenty of reason to train cameras on the homes they rent out to strangers. They can catch guests who attempt to steal, or who trash the place, or who initially say they're traveling alone, then show up to a property with five people. A representative for Airbnb's Trust & Safety communications department told me the company tries to filter out hosts who may attempt to surveil guests by matching them against sex-offender and felony databases. The company also uses risk scores to flag suspicious behavior, in addition to reviewing and booting hosts with consistently poor scores.

If a guest contacts Airbnb's Trust & Safety team with a complaint about a camera, employees offer new accommodations if necessary and open an investigation into the host. [...] But four guests who found cameras in their rentals told The Atlantic the company has inconsistently applied its own rules when investigating their claims, providing them with incorrect information and making recommendations that they say risked putting them in harm's way. "There have been super terrible examples of privacy violations by AirBnB hosts, e.g., people have found cameras hidden in alarm clocks in their bedrooms," wrote Jeff Bigham, a computer-science professor at Carnegie Mellon whose claim was initially denied after he reported cameras in his rental. "I feel like our experience is in some ways more insidious. If you find a truly hidden camera in your bedroom or bathroom, Airbnb will support you. If you find an undisclosed camera in the private living room, Airbnb will not support you."

127 comments

  1. No surprise by fluffernutter · · Score: 3

    You are staying in someone's house and they have no oversight by any authority.... what did you THINK was going to happen?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new marketing campaign?... Air-b-Voyeur

    2. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and they have no oversight by any authority" - Well, anyone can always document the evidence and sue. The "authority" doesn't pre-verify that nobody is going to do anything illegal, that must be reported to the authority.

      Recording people with an expectation of privacy like in a bedroom or bathroom without disclosure is defacto illegal in most states, but you're going to have to be damaged to be in a position to collect damages.

      If the BNB host doesn't post your private info on the internet or use it for xyz, the damages are minimal and probably not worth litigating. OTOH, if someone has a big-$ property and does this, they have assets to take.

      Air-BNB is always going to have rubber-meeting-road issues like this, so their strength or weakness is how they respond and mitigate problems. This sounds like they are continuing to take a hands-off approach.

      Just like they did with the hotel tax and residential housing "microfrauds" until cities regulated them into compliance.

    3. Re:No surprise by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone stay in a place where it was there responsibility to scour for video cameras so that the owner may be reported if corrupt? Sorry that's not something I want to worry about on my vacation, still sticking with a fairly known hotel chain.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:No surprise by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

      Recording people with an expectation of privacy like in a bedroom or bathroom without disclosure is defacto illegal in most states

      As long as airbnb is not recognized as an hotel, the owner records whatever they want in their own private apartment.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:No surprise by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the laws in most places would be the authority providing oversight. A landlord cannot place a surveillance device inside a tenants rental, at least in the states that I am aware of, and it could very well be a federal crime as well. I guess you could agree to allow the landlord to record you, but who in their right mind would do that? And are they getting approval from every single person staying on the property? if not, it is illegal. This is not an AirBnB problem. This is a problem with rental properties and perverts and it should be solved by prosecuting these landlords to the full extent of the law.

    6. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is entirely wrong. The remedy unfortunately comes in court, after the fact, exclusively but it's not legal to record someone who has a legal expectation of privacy, even in your own owned property. False.

    7. Re:No surprise by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on the laws in your country. In the U.S., it is a felony.

    8. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan it is almost compulsory.

    9. Re:No surprise by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You are staying in someone's house and they have no oversight by any authority.... what did you THINK was going to happen?

      Actually you do.

      Many countries have privacy acts specifically for accommodation providers which expressly prohibit the secret recording of guests, especially in private. As a hotelier put it to me once, cameras in the hallway, not in the rooms. Even then there are regulations as to how these recordings are to be secured and how long they can be kept for.

      AirBNB is completely legal here in the UK, but operators are still responsible for complying with the laws. Recording people in private without express consent, let alone without their knowledge is quite illegal. Even in public areas, hidden cameras are a no-no.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:No surprise by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The law is only as effective if people get caught.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  2. Not enough of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is the problem. And not enough zoom!

    Your,
    The president

  3. cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apartmen by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apartments.

    timeshares likely are the same way.

    Now under the law in some areas airbnb is seen as an hotel room so they may not be legal at all.

  4. Maybe... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 3, Informative

    the reason people choose to stay in AirBNB is because they know they will be recorded.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Maybe... by ZoomieDood · · Score: 1

      Coming to a television network near you...

      Hidden camera recordings of sleeping guests, with strangers walking around and watching them sleep.

  5. Sharing economy at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an interesting aspect to the sharing economy that nobody talks about. With the industrialized versions of things like hotels and taxis and the like, the companies are subject to oversight and regulation that eliminates the fringes of society from causing problems. The sharing economy skirts those regulations and allows individuals to become competitive with the big companies in those areas, but with no oversight the people in the weird fringes of society become front and center.

    What happens when someone releases online a video of a minor changing or in the bathroom? AirBnB would argue they're not responsible, but they enabled and could be considered an accessory. Does it bring the whole thing down?

    It seems like all these sharing economy deals are constantly fighting the fringe of society's weird habits, all the way to the point where they die or they end up looking like the highly regulated industries they were trying to disrupt.

    1. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're just seeing the tip of the iceberg. We'll be so far down the rabbit hole praising seemingly inexpensive services that cut regulations it will be too late to go back when we figure out that those regulations are there for good reason forged by real live experience. Something like how we let Google and Facebook violate everyone's privacy and now that is very difficult to undo.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's almost like modern laws are the product of thousands of years of patching over the shittier bits of human nature for the purpose of keeping civilisation mostly working, and not some conspiracy to make it hard to accumulate wealth, but that can't be right.

    3. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's been nice proving you wrong.

    4. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      "sharing economy"

      There is no new sharing economy. It always existed before and after. Hotels grew out of this. regulations were established to protect the consumer. Here comes the Internet and technology that facilitates. It facilitates the ease of finding and it also facilitates scams. AirBnB doesn't want to assume any responsibility but are being forced kicking and screaming.

      AirBnB is such an irresponsible company that it refuses to post reviews where people have been scammed. Properties listed were filthy, bug infested, completely not as advertised or simply nonexistent. You only learn about this once you get burned and AirBnB will fight you all the way. They can burn in hell for all I care.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    5. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumbass, he's pointing out that "it's" also means "it has".

    6. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      With the industrialized versions of things like hotels and taxis and the like, the companies are subject to oversight and regulation that eliminates the fringes of society from causing problems. The sharing economy skirts those regulations and allows individuals to become competitive with the big companies in those areas, but with no oversight the people in the weird fringes of society become front and center.

      Isn't that why taxis and hotels existed in the first place, though? What is the new part?

  6. even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Airbnb's rules allow cameras outdoors and in living rooms and common areas, but never in bathrooms or anywhere guests plan to sleep, including rooms with foldout beds.

    I don't really see how a camera in the living room is acceptable either.

    1. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to hearing you complain when you let a bunch of randoms stay in your house while you're away and they end up trashing it and when you try to get compensated for the damages AirBnB invokes the mandatory binding arbitration clause of your agreement with them and you end up getting nothing.

    2. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Airbnb's rules allow cameras outdoors and in living rooms

      Are you kidding me? How this can be acceptable at all?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's not really a vacation unless you and your significant other have successfully "christened" every room in the place, including the basement and the backyard hammock.

    4. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You already were compensated so your complaint is that the world may not support your business model

      Your charge should factor in the probability of sunny-day scenarios x the revenue, he probabilities of poor outcomes with the cost of remediation, plus the value you lost by not having access to the property, plus wear and tear etc.

      Since you have taken the risk premia you should insured it, otherwise amortised it across a population of consumers, or accept the risk, depending on your risk appetite.

    5. Re: even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Airbnb policy allow using an EMP device to sanitize the place instead of playing hide and seek with the cameras?

    6. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't rent if you can't take the risk. Aka don't run essentially a hotel business.

    7. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to anyone putting their shitty house on AirBNB getting shafted because karma.

    8. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Looking forward to hearing you complain when you let a bunch of randoms stay in your house while you're away and they end up trashing it "

      I wouldn't let randos stay in my house while I was away. So I will never have that problem.

      And if I did purchase a 2ndary property to rent out to randos, I'd furnish it accordingly, and insure it accordingly, and then charge accordingly. And I still wouldn't put a camera in the living room.

    9. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a vacation home on Airbnb; it's about 2 hours from my home. I have cameras outside, so I can keep an eye on the trash cans, see when guests or cleaners arrive, etc. I wouldn't put one inside though, that's just going to creep people out.

    10. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put one inside though, that's just going to creep people out.

      The problem is that most hosts don't say cameras are inside the apartment, and guests don't know.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    11. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0

      There is plenty of evidence others would. And there is no real hard evidence you would not other than some declaration made anonymously in slashdot.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    12. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Iwastheone · · Score: 1

      If there's a camera in some place that I'm renting, that'd be when duct tape is my friend. There's a Kickstarter project that detects hidden camera lenses, link below... How Does It Work? When the power button is “pressed” on side of unit, and you look through the viewfinder, it activates six special bright-red LED strobe lights designed to bounce off the smallest of camera lenses. The tiny camera lens will appear to blink back at you as a reflection off camera lens itself , instantly giving away its location as you scan the area around you. It doesn’t matter if the camera is turned on or off, recording or not...even if its a non-working camera, the blinking effect will clearly show you the presence of a camera lens which is almost impossible to detect with the naked eye. Knowing where the camera is located will allow you to take immediate action to prevent unauthorized recording of activity. In addition, there are 3 LED intensity levels which helps hone in on camera lenses which could be hidden behind different surfaces. A flat wall 30 feet away could use the highest LED intensity, while a semi reflective shiny surface 5 feet away would use the lowest intensity. This prevents false reflections, maximizing the ability to find a hidden camera lens in any room environment. https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...

    13. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There is plenty of evidence others would."

      Sure. Lots of people are stupid and do stupid things. We don't even need hard evidence of that, but I agree lots of people rent their house out to randos without thinking it through.

      For what its worth though, I've rented a fair number of short term rentals around the world, and all the ones I've stayed at were NOT someone's regular home -- they have been 2ndary properties permanently run as short term rentals, furnished accordingly, nice, clean, but nothing especially valuable in them; and in most of the cases I even interacted with a property manager rather than the property owner.

      "And there is no real hard evidence you would not other than some declaration made anonymously in slashdot."

      Hard evidence of me personally? Sure I guess not, but there is plenty of hard evidence that LOTS of people are running their short term rentals the same way I claimed I would. Go look at airbnd... lots of them are clearly and obviously no one's primary residence. And there is also plenty of hard evidence that lots of people aren't running their primary residence as a short term rental when they go on vacation.

      So I'm not sure what your point was in attempting to shoot down my argument by attacking my credibility... surely you don't find it that incredible that people would operate the way I claim to. Surely you agree beyond a doubt that there are plenty of people doing exactly what I claimed I'd do.

    14. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to hearing you complain when you let a bunch of randoms stay in your house while you're away and they end up trashing it and when you try to get compensated for the damages AirBnB invokes the mandatory binding arbitration clause of your agreement with them and you end up getting nothing.

      If you let a bunch of randoms stay in your house you are just not very bright.

    15. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Because the Hotel Lobby is *eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil*

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    16. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Solandri · · Score: 1

      And if I did purchase a 2ndary property to rent out to randos, I'd furnish it accordingly, and insure it accordingly, and then charge accordingly. And I still wouldn't put a camera in the living room.

      That's the beauty of it. You can rent out your property without a camera. Other property owners can put in a camera, inform the renter, and charge a lower rental fee because they don't have to insure as heavily as you do. And the renter can choose which they prefer - no camera but higher cost, or lower cost but with a camera.

      Ultimately it doesn't matter what the property owner or some random Joe on the Internet thinks. It's up to the renter to choose what they want (the customer is always right). If they're opposed to cameras as vehemently as you are, then they'll gladly pay extra to cover your additional insurance and rent your unit because it doesn't have cameras. If they don't really care about cameras, they'll pass on your higher-priced rental. Airbnb's policy just makes sure the renter is informed, so they can make an informed decision.

    17. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously comparing the expectation of privacy in a hotel lobby to the living room in your hotel suite?

    18. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh so everytime you go to hotel lobby you ask them to turn all cameras off?

    19. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you inspect the property, rent it out to someone who gives you CC details, and on the day they leave the cleaner reports a mess.

      It doesn't need Sherlock Holmes or a camera.

  7. Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Require the guests to provide a before and after photograph of every room in the house in case there is a contesting of damages.

    This provides what the host wants (proof that they didn't damage the home) while freeing the tenants from expectations of being spied upon. Obviously there are issues like if they broke into/stole from closets and the like, but unless you have perfect coverage of the entire place with multiple cameras, that is already a potential cause for concern. If you are renting out your furnished living accomodations then perhaps you should put some effort into securing all areas you don't want the guest having access to, and noting THOSE areas may be under surveillance, while the areas they have rented are not.

    This isn't rocket science, this is common sense. Hell, you can even have the airbnb app handle the before/after pictures to make sure they aren't tampered with, obviously prompting the guest before ANY viewing or recording of media from the camera is initiated.

    1. Re:Simple solution: by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Meh, I think you miss the point. If there is a camera in the living room, there is a more likely chance that there are cameras in the bathroom and bedroom too. No thanks. I'll use camera free services that trust me.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good choice. Keep your meth labs away from the cameras.

    3. Re:Simple solution: by supremebob · · Score: 1

      So, basically bad actors are going to do this:

      Take "before" picture
      Trash the place
      Copy airbnb-before.jpg to airbnb-after.jpg
      If they are really crafty, maybe they'll go into the EXIF data and change some timestamps and maybe change the brightness and contrast settings of the picture so it looks slightly different.
      Submit the "before" and "after" pictures to Airbnb.

      When the damage claim comes in, just say "Hey, burglars must have come in and wrecked the place after I left!"

    4. Re:Simple solution: by ledow · · Score: 2

      Not hard.

      I take two sets of images in the first ten minutes of getting there, modify the dates on them, trash the place, claim them to be my "before" and "after" images, and then the next guy who rents it out starts with a trashed place and there's not really much you can do. Or, hell, just tidy the bits and pick the right camera angle.

      This isn't rocket science. The aim is to stop your place getting trashed by people who have little to no consequences for doing so (Or else why would you need the camera? Just take your own photos before renting, which prove they trashed it, and the consequences fall on the person responsible). Not to lay blame after it's been trashed.

      And in the same way that the people renting the place can trash it without consequences, the people who are renting it out can breach privacy, record sex tapes and not tell anyone without consequences. Maybe not by the letter of the law, but Airbnb wouldn't have these problems in the first place if everyone just abided by the law.

      The problem is endemic to the service they're trying to provide - because they are providing it outside any bounds of normality or sensibility. Maybe if you said "To use Airbnb you must lay down a $1000 deposit which we will only refund to your account when the owner says that the condition is good, the property wasn't misused and nothing was stolen" and then use normal renting/surveying normalities to assess that. Then one deposit of $1000, and keeping sensible, keeps your costs down to cheap places only, and you get your $1000 back. And trashing a place costs you $1000 a time, minimal.

      But at the moment you can pay a pittance for one person, rent out someone's posh flat for the day, invite 1000 people over, trash it, and pretty much the consequences are minimal. Guess who's gonna use that... drug dens, raves, teenage drunken bashes, brothels. Next day, do the same but have your mate sign up and choose the venue instead of you, and then divide the rent by 1000 people each to cover the cost. Who the hell is going to know? And it'll take 1000 such incidents before you get anywhere near difficulty in signing up with a new account.

      Airbnb is a stupid idea. And they aren't monitoring either of their customers properly, as it shows.

      Either *AirBNB* come in, certify the place is in good nick, take ID of the renting party, take a deposit, take responsibility for their actions, have insurance, rectify any damage, and check at the end of the rental to ensure everything is how it was, or you're basically putting a sign in a shop window saying "House to rent / trash, $100 a day, no checks required".

      Just quite what part are AirBNB playing in the entire transaction? They run a website. That's about it.

      P.S. you can't secure anything in a house that someone with a couple of minutes and a few tools can't get into. Not even a safe. Let alone entire fecking rooms.

    5. Re:Simple solution: by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      That brings up another issue: if AirBnb in indemnifying renters whose property gets damaged, what's to stop them from renting to someone, coming in after they leave and trashing the place, and having AirBnb pick up the tab for their remodel? I'm pretty sure some people have tried it...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Simple solution: by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      if AirBnb in indemnifying renters whose property gets damaged...

      I assume you meant is, and that is just charming. AirBnB is an app and a website, and they take 0% liability and 0% risk. The owner and renter take on 100% and AirBnB walks away with a slice of the profit.

      There have been bunches of stories about how homeowners have come back to trashed places, AirBnB won't help, and their homeowner's insurance won't cover it because they didn't have commercial renters insurance.

      Like most startup/gig economy companies, you get what you pay for with AirBnB.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are really crafty, maybe they'll go into the EXIF data and change some timestamps and maybe change the brightness and contrast settings of the picture so it looks slightly different.

      Or just change the date and time on the camera to when you'll be leaving and take a second picture under different lighting conditions before the thrashing begins. Much less crafty, same effect, plus a bonus in that you don't have to muck around in EXIF data and potentially miss something.

    8. Re:Simple solution: by robbak · · Score: 1

      You are outlining a system that adds several hundred dollars of overheads to each rental, and therefore eliminates the concept of short term, non commercial rentals.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    9. Re:Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too obvious. Take a before photo, then move a few things around and take an "after" photo and modify the EXIF data. That way the images aren't identical - far more convincing.

    10. Re:Simple solution: by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      According to AirBnb,com, "The Airbnb Host Guarantee provides protection for up to $1,000,000 to a host for damages to covered property in the rare event of guest damages above the security deposit or if no security deposit is in place."

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  8. Trust and Safety Committee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the company tries to filter out hosts who may attempt to surveil guests by matching them against sex-offender and felony databases.

    It sounds more like AirBnB has a "Bad Guests" problem.

  9. Do we get a discount? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Some people would take the discount?

    Or just put it in the legal agreement text... it's not like people bothered to pay attention to facebook etc.

    1. Re:Do we get a discount? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Some people would take the discount?

      We'll knock off 10% for the bathroom cam.
      An additional 25% for the bedroom cam!

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:Do we get a discount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a male with no sense of shame, DEAL!

  10. Disconnect from the Internet by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

    Considering most (all?) of these cameras are cloud-based, and thus rely on an Internet connection, just disconnect the modem/router when you first arrive if you're really that concerned about it and only re-connect it when you need to use it for something. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Disconnect from the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very frequently that modem/router isn't accessible. The last couple spots I've stayed have been in duplexes, with the wifi/modem located in the other unit. Additionally, tampering with such electronics is likely a violation of the AirBnB user policy and would likely cause you not to be able to use the service again.

    2. Re:Disconnect from the Internet by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Of course you're assuming you have physical access to the wireless router, which may or may not be true.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Disconnect from the Internet by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      You are posting this on a technology forum. Do you honestly think you can identify my router or the five access points? Short of cutting off the home's wiring connection to the grid someone with half of a mind doing something like this "to protect their property" would certainly not have this connected through the visible connection.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    4. Re:Disconnect from the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would disconnecting the modem/router work with certainty? What if the site has a local storage server? Disconnect the switch you say? What if the DVR has coax camera inputs? Shut off the DVR? What if the cameras have onboard storage? Cut power to the cameras? What if they have batteries? It isn't easy to truly and completely know if you have disabled a system.

    5. Re:Disconnect from the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think the surveillance cameras are on the open guest wifi? Hosts aren't stupid. Many places I've been to have a second network that doesn't seem to go over the visible router. Also a camera doesn't have to be online to record.

  11. Airbnb by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, it's almost like it's a bad idea to use a middleman to rent out your home on a per-day basis to random strangers who you don't trust enough to not put cameras everywhere, and who don't want you to put cameras everywhere, and where the middleman says you can't put cameras everywhere without telling everyone what the cameras can't see and some places you can't put cameras at all, and then relying on some unspoken trust model to make it all work.

    I can't see a problem with that business model *at all*.

    Airbnb is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard of. It has nothing *but* advantages for the people renting those places out, and nothing *but* disadvantages for the person doing the renting.

    1. Re:Airbnb by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >Airbnb is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard of. It has nothing *but* advantages for the people renting those places out, and nothing *but* disadvantages for the person doing the renting.

      Advantages for the host : They get money.
      Advantages for the guest : It usually costs less. It's often available in places that hotels are not available.
      Disadvantages for the host : They don't get to use the property they are renting out for their own purposes. There's a shitton of cleaning to do.
      Disadvantages for the guest : Ummm. You don't get SPG points. I dunno. I host and I use airbnbs and it's all around more convenient and cheaper than hotels.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Airbnb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advantages for the Guest: No damn Knock Knock "Housekeeping" at 9 in the morning.

    3. Re:Airbnb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are advantages. I know someone who started with nothing and now own 9 houses, paid for by their guests. I'd call that an advantage.

    4. Re:Airbnb by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      I would say one disadvantage to the guest, though some might view it as an advantage, is that the experience isn't predictable. My family almost always uses a specific chain of hotels because we've always been happy with the rooms we've rented so far as cleanliness, smell, amenities, furnishings and in particular the feel of the mattresses that they use. It's the same reason chain restaurants are so popular, they provide a consistent experience.

    5. Re:Airbnb by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:Airbnb by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      This is true. However there is generally a lot of user review available to the guest before booking. There is also host reviewing of the guests. So everyone is generally on their best behaviour if they plan to keep using AirBnB. I've been in some pretty bad hotels and yet the reviews will be great - probably heavily polluted with fake reviews. AirBnB reviews are limited to actual guests who have been there.

      The issue of a hotel not being available seems to be a bigger one. Try getting a place in a non-hotel-dense area. There will usually be AirBnBs. So sometimes there isn't even an option.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    7. Re:Airbnb by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      nothing *but* disadvantages for the person doing the renting.

      ...Price?

    8. Re:Airbnb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then pay for a second night you cheap fucker. How do you think the rooms get cleaned? Magic pixies do it instantaneously?

    9. Re:Airbnb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Main advantage for me (apart from price): No nosy personnel. No fucking room service that comes into your room unannounced, messes up things, sometimes steals. I can cook and wash clothes in the sink and make a mess and feel like I'm on vacation or at home in my own place, not visiting my parents, and leave the cleaning for the last day.

    10. Re:Airbnb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If checkout time is 11:30, why the fuck are they bothering me at 9?

    11. Re:Airbnb by dougTheRug · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean the opposite? All the benefits go to the visitors, not the hosts.

    12. Re:Airbnb by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Yes. We make of point of saying we won't come in the room unless you ask us to.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  12. not suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why fuck AirBNB

  13. Yeah, whatever, but what about white nationalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Airbnb banned white nationalists yet? That's the REAL pressing issue of our time!

  14. you take the risk by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    All of these services cut costs by transferring risk to consumer. This is their business model, to circumvent decades of regulations, and provide value to those who want it. There is nothing wrong with this, except that generations of Americans have grown up being protected, and they continue to believe those protections are in place even when they clearly are not.

    So, if you pay for the Hampton, there are a bunch of things that come with it. It is unlikely that you are going to be filmed having sex because the entire assets of the corporation are going to be up for grabs when some wiley lawyer takes the case.

    On there other hand, there is no reason that an AirBnB renter has not to film you having sex, or that AirBnb has to prevent this. There renter is going to have minimal exposure, and AIrBnB has none as long as it makes a passing effort to say it does not support such actions.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:you take the risk by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I find it astonishing that anyone is interested in this business model. Even if you have a vacation home or something that is usually vacant there are property management companies that do things like properly vet renters; help make sure you have the right types of insurance (or sell it to you), have cheaper bulk contracts with maid services etc to handle clean up before and after renters visit. Yes they take a bigger bit of the action than Airbnb does of course but on the other hand they take on a lot more of the risk.

      I can only imagine how it go for a lessor if say a guest is hurt or killed because say a deck collapses (even after said guest put way to many people on it) and some lawyer finds there was even the slightest of building code or maintenance violations...

      Why the hell would you want to risk your life being destroyed to make a few hundred bucks?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:you take the risk by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      The risk is low. 2 years of renting out and we've had precisely 0 problems with guests.

      There are plenty of reasons to no film guests in their rooms. (A) Not being a total shit (B) Avoiding being arrested and thrown in jail (C) Avoiding losing AirBnB income.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:you take the risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's what umbrella insurance is for. In my case, I gross $30k+ per year from my vacation rental, so it's more than a few hundred bucks. And because I do all the management work, my expenses are tax deductible. For me, Airbnb has been great, and 95% of the guests I have had have been pretty perfect. The couple who were less than perfect didn't actually do any real damage.

    4. Re:you take the risk by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      You are not in any danger of losing AirBnB income. They don't give a crap.

      You are probably missing out on revenue generation potential of live streaming various parts of your home surreptitiously.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re: you take the risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The issue is not risk to the renter. I have no doubt I could make 30k a year selling amateur hidden videos of couples having sex. It is the risk to the renter and lack of remediation. Is Airbnb going to compensate anyone when a drunk relative terrorizes a guest not knowing that the guest is not the xwife. This happened to a friend if mine.

    6. Re:you take the risk by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You say that as though we as a society wanted varying amounts of risk/reward. We didn't. We voted for regulations that set a minimum level. Avoiding that level is illegal and, frankly, the government needs to do far more to force AirBnB to fall in line or take a hike.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  15. Why would you call AirBNB about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and not just call the police? (well, or call both but there's no mention he called the police at all)

    1. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Because nearly all AirBnB rentals are in violation of the law.

    2. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you just have no idea what the law is, being a moron generally.

    3. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Nope, you just have no idea what the law is, being a moron generally.

      A lot of locations have laws against short term rentals (ie, hotels) in residential zones or properties. Many also have hotel taxes that AirBnB properties avoid paying even they are operating as hotels, and generally aren't up to code for fire/safety conditions the law specifies for hotels.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, a lot of AirBnB rentals DO violate local zoning/licensing laws.

    5. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not zoned comercial? You're breaking the law, moron.

  16. Re: This is backwards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you rent via Airbnb, then?
    Use more traditional renting schemes where renters are properly screened?

  17. If I am on camera .. by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    If I am on camera then it's the owner who has a problem .. because he gets to see me walk around naked and sit on the furniture naked and peer out the window naked and surf for "not-porn" naked etc etc etc

    And I am not exactly a male model

    But yeah .. I shouldn't have to worry about being spied on. AirBnB already has my cc and other details so it would be easy for them to track me down after the fact.

    Now I am wondering if if some sort of infrared laser gizmo exists that would blank out all the cameras in a room?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:If I am on camera .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea! Most pick up near field infra-red, so just make a device that's like a round ball with a bunch of IR transmitters to try to wash everything out.

      Granted that wouldn't work during the daytime as they tend to have an IR filter for daytime use.. in that case just use a 2w green laser pointer and blast everything when you first get there.. that should burn out any CMOS sensor

    2. Re:If I am on camera .. by Bomazi · · Score: 1

      If you know the location of a camera you can point an infrared lamp at it. This will saturate the sensor. The bonus is that you won't see it so it won't bother you.

    3. Re:If I am on camera .. by mccrew · · Score: 1

      Oh great, something else to add to my toiletry kit...

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  18. Re:This is backwards! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    AirBnB isn't for renting out your home, it's for renting out your other properties and eschewing all regulation regarding hotels, tenant's rights, short term rentals, etc.

  19. Re:This is backwards! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    AirBnB isn't for renting out your home, it's for renting out your other properties and eschewing all regulation regarding hotels, tenant's rights, short term rentals, etc.

    A guy I work with rents out an inlaw suite that is attached to his house. I've seen AirBnBs where people are renting out basements while occupying the upper floors of a house.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  20. That brings up the question by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    What's the best way to hide cameras so my guests can never find them? It's legal to record video, but recording audio puts you in violation of the wiretap laws... yeah, our laws are backwards.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:That brings up the question by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Because laws were written a long time ago, when only audio recording was practically possible.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  21. Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister rents her place out every time she goes anywhere. It greatly offsets the cost of a vacation and sometimes pays for it entirely.

  22. Get Over It by Improbus · · Score: 2

    Cameras are everywhere. They are getting smaller and more plentiful every year. The world truly is a stage and we are the players. Be smarter than a politician and just assume you are always being recorded.

  23. commentsubject by Falos · · Score: 1

    Awful lot of people here seem to be oozing with anxiety, as though they had an assumption of being in a nice, invisible, private domain. Which is fine to expect in my own home, but not something I'd naively entertain in this scenario.

    These are probably the same people who are oblivious to the ocean of invisible databases they're swimming in. With data regarding them. The people who happily facetweet the day away then shout "how is that legal" when shit comes to roost, when their insurance goes up about something "they couldn't possibly know about". The people who think incognito mode does anything. The people who think a website can't track every action you take because "I bought an iphone and apple doesn't sell data". FFS you're logged into a user account with your name right on it.

    Hell, just the people crazy enough to browse on a phone period. The tactics used to defy surveillance in 2019 are ever more demanding, but there's no expertise requirement to stop being naive. Assume everything is logged. Assume any data you don't directly control is immediately available to every group and person in existence.

    It's only gonna get worse. You think traffic light cameras are bad? Get ready for a brave new world of LPRs and facerec.

  24. Re:cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apart by magarity · · Score: 2

    cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apartments.

    They are allowed in hotel lobbies, elevators, stairwells, and hallways. Is an Airbnb's living room area under the same category?

  25. I rent two units via AirBNB and I have cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And I fully disclose them to the renters.

    They are located in places like living rooms and kitchens and hallways. They are obvious and in your face. The power cord is plugged into a wall outlet directly below the camera. Renters are instructed to unplug the power if uncomfortable but are required to plug back in when checking out. 99% renters do exactly that with zero complaints. 1 renter didn't unplug it and did walk around the house naked. It was their choice and they never said anything to me. I deleted the pics and videos that were captured.

    They are there for when the property is unoccupied and gives me a slight sense of security if someone tries to rob my house when nobody is there. Maybe theives can get caught by the evidence gathered and given to LEO But more importantly I will have rock solid evidence for an insurance claim.

    Hidden cameras in a rental are illegal as near as I can tell. Even for AirBNB owners. It is criminal and if they get caught should be prosecuted. No different than for hotels.

    Outside the rental is different. Hidden cams are just fine. I don't use them (have considered it and still may) but you can't walk around naked or have sex outside either.

    Fair deal.

  26. What happens? Jail. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The sharing economy skirts those regulations and allows individuals to become competitive with the big companies in those areas, but with no oversight the people in the weird fringes of society become front and center.

    So what do we call Slashdot ACs? The Aristocrats.

    Your elitism is appalling.

    What happens when someone releases online a video of a minor changing or in the bathroom?

    Jail, because there are laws against that kind of thing you know?

    In particular for this topic, there are in fact laws in many places against recording people without them knowing. I wouldn't say the desire to see what renters are doing to a property is in any way "fringe" and I think you are quite a horrible person for attempting to belittle the people trying ti make money from personal property.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. Re:cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apart by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Airbnb's living room area is in side an full house that is rented out as one likely = an apartment

  28. Hotels are immune from this problem by virtig01 · · Score: 1

    Sorry that's not something I want to worry about on my vacation, still sticking with a fairly known hotel chain.

    That's right, hotel rooms are special anti-camera zones; there's no problems with hidden cameras there.

    1. Re:Hotels are immune from this problem by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Really, I would have thought you would have brought up Erin Andrews because at least that happened in the US. But it happened because she was a popular figure, not because hotels are inherently bad.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Hotels are immune from this problem by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I can't comment on how South Korea runs their hotels. It is certainly very different then here or anywhere I care to visit.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  29. Re: This is backwards! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Airbnb offers interesting rentals, like a whole apartment. Most people don't know they are recorded from hidden cameras within the apartment ; otherwise they wouldn't rent at all.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  30. Is this really AirBNB-specific? by virtig01 · · Score: 2

    Less than a week ago, a couple of guys were busted for planting 30 cameras in hotel rooms in Korea. They then sold the livestreams to subscribers.

    I don't see this as a problem created by AirBNB disrupting the hotel industry; it's a result of small, cheap, network accessible cameras.

    1. Re:Is this really AirBNB-specific? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      30 cameras found in all the hotel rooms in the US is a very low rate of cameras. I imagine the rate of hidden cameras in AirBnBs are at least 2 orders of magnitude higher.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  31. I'm guessing AirBnB renters are mostly by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    folks in desperate need of some cash, similar to Uber drivers. I know the last 4 or 5 Ubers I took the person was either recently laid off or a Sales person going through a dry spell. One of them used to make good money selling mattresses and his company got bought out by one of the chains and they screwed him on commissions.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm guessing AirBnB renters are mostly by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Like i said elsewhere, most short term rentals I've used were permanently run as such, with property managers etc.

      I'm not sure what the breakdown is between those and genuine people renting their house when they go on vacation but the pros definitely skew the listings since their units are available 24x7 365 a year unless someone else has already booked it... instead of a week or two here and there when the owners aren't home.

      And I prefer dealing with the pros -- for them its a business, they're less likely to be crazy neurotic as its really not 'their home' and they're more experienced, and know what guests are going to want and need and more organized about everything, they have professional cleaners and property managers etc.

      Plus they have more reviews because they've got lots of units and lots of people coming through. So i have a better idea what im getting. And I can avoid the people who don't know what they are doing.

      So I've never stayed in someones actual house while they were away, and honestly I prefer it that way.

  32. I think there's everything wrong with it. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Those regulations were passed for a reason. Specifically because people were being abused. If we let AirBnB out of those regulations because it's "on the internet" or the "sharing economy" it's only a matter of time before the big folks like Hamptons make use of those loop holes. At that point you're back to "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law".

    I'd like to see AirBnB regulated until they're either safe and have little or no negative impact on communities (or at least significantly less than the value they bring) or put out of business. And that goes for all companies. My experience is that if you give somebody an inch, they take a mile. Which is another way to say "Those regulations were passed for a reason".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  33. I'm 350lbs, hairy, 5ft 5in - nudity is my life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 350lbs, hairy, 5ft 5in - nudity is my life!
    Inside A-BnB rentals, I wear a thong. Need to show some decorum for other people's homes.

  34. hmm this aritcle sounds mad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airbnb doesnt have a problem, people have concept issue
    its my house and I will record whatever the hell I want in it .
    Secret cameras should be revealed, but nothing more than that... and I dont understand a problem of homeowners comparing guests with criminal databases ... ? In fact that already should be airbnb job since otherwise I as homeowner can be liable for abetting a criminal.

  35. What about cameras left behind by customers? by misnohmer · · Score: 1

    I can see another problem with guests installing tiny hidden cameras, tapped into main power (say a bathroom light) and using WiFi internet to stream videos.

  36. Re:cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd argue a rented apartment is equivalent to a hotel suite so no. The outdoor areas might be allowed.

  37. Re:Yeah, whatever, but what about white nationalis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they have.

    https://www.airbnb.com/help/ar...

    Because white nationalists don't belong anywhere.

  38. Airbnb Has a Hidden-Camera Problem by strikethree · · Score: 1

    How is this Airbnb's problem? They have policies in place against them and they appear to enforce those policies. So, how is it Airbnb's problem?

    No. The problem belongs completely to two parties, with a third party, the police, having to deal with this. The two parties are (wait for it, I know this will be surprising as fuck to everyone) the host and the guest.

    I am not even going to read the article (is there one even linked?) because the title says, "I was written by a noob SJW who assumes they know everything about everything and if you don't agree with me, you are wrong. And I know EXACTLY where to place the blame."

    Um, dude? Really? You don't know shit and flaunting your ignorance so arrogantly is, quite frankly, disgusting.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  39. Aleister Crowley quote - good man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outstanding.