Slashdot Mirror


Google Is Killing Off the Pixel 2, Inbox, goo.gl URL Shortener, and Google+ This Week (pcworld.com)

In addition to shutting down Google+, Google URL Shortener, and Inbox by Gmail this week, the company has stopped selling its Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL smartphones through its online store, which means whatever remaining stock at other retailers will likely be extremely limited. It also means that the $799 Pixel 3 is now the cheapest phone Google sells. PCWorld summarizes the other three products coming to an end this week: Inbox by Gmail: When the Inbox by Gmail app launched in 2015, it was a revelation. A completely new way to view and organize your messages, Inbox boiled your emails down to a smart task manager, with bundles, pins, scheduling, and shortcuts that made managing your inbox a breeze. But over the years, Google's interest in Inbox faded, and it never really got the attention it deserved. Most of its unique features are now part of the Gmail app (though we're still waiting for bundles), and several third-party apps have adopted Inbox's style. Apparently that's good enough for Google, because as of this week you won't be able to use it anymore.

Google URL Shortener (goo.gl): Back in 2009, link shortening was still a novel idea, and Google was one of the first to bring the concept to the masses with the Google URL Shortener. It was a simple way to turn a lengthy web address into a short one that consisted of goo.gl and a short string of letter and numbers. With the rise of bit.ly and similar services, Google's own URL shortener became less important to people's work flow and now, nearly 10 years later, it's gone for good.

Google+: Google+ was once supposed to be the one-stop shop for social and support among Google users, but it never really caught on. And then it was revealed that some 50 million users may have had their name, email address, occupation, and age exposed to third-party developers, which accelerated its demise. Now it's going away for good, but we can't imagine that anyone will actually notice.

9 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. Can't always get what you want. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google+ was once supposed to be the one-stop shop for social and support among Google users, but it never really caught on.

    Well... Google wanted to be the one-stop shop anyway.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re: Can't always get what you want. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One stop shops main features are convenience and simplicity. I can't imagine why Google didn't succeed.

      Never used Google+ but perhaps it wasn't convenient or simple.

      All I know is that they changed (i.e.: screwed up) the use of "+" the search field.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  2. URL shorteners SUCK by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    URL shorteners SUCK, they're a miserably bad idea and always have been.

    Case in point: goo.gl.....what happens to the millions upon millions of links now obfuscated by non-functioning goo.gl? They get lost and millions of 404 errors will rule the day.

    Link shorteners have ALWAYS been a shitty, stupid idea. They're a great way to trick people into visiting some shitty malware site, but more importantly they break a fundamental part of the web- the fucking URL itself.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:URL shorteners SUCK by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're a great way to trick people into visiting some shitty malware site, but more importantly they break a fundamental part of the web- the fucking URL itself.

      Yes, that's their primary use, malware. It's not so you can tell a human a URL they can remember. :rolleyes:

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:URL shorteners SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, that's their primary use, malware. It's not so you can tell a human a URL they can remember. :rolleyes:

      This has got to be a troll, right? Sometimes it's hard to tell.

      Yeah... shortened URLs people can remember, like http://shortlink.com/fi8z92gf3

      So short. Much memorable.

    3. Re:URL shorteners SUCK by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so you can tell a human a URL they can remember. :rolleyes:

      Roll your eyes all you want, the fact is that you never tell someone to go to "http://goo.gl/x/dj4980fhd", do you?

      Or maybe "Yah, just go to http://goo.gl/x/m2c_(Qw-sfcn3"

      Sure you do. Give me a fucking break- even short URLs aren't memorable.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:URL shorteners SUCK by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While most features of goo.gl will eventually sunset, all existing links will continue to redirect to the intended destination

      Remember this iin a couple of years when they sunset those links too. Seriously, do you trust google to keep anything up and running after they start decommissioning other parts of it? Do any parts of Hangouts still work?

      Maybe Google Graveyard will help make my disbelief clear: https://killedbygoogle.com/

      I wouldn't rely on those links staying viable for any extended period of time. Maybe they will, but I wouldn't bet a dollar on it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  3. Google breaks the web, yet again by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Broken links break the web.

    Google should have been forced to use the link shortener exclusively for all it's own internal web sites. Then it would have been safer.

    the new threat is the google AMP and other accelated pages. This is already breaking compaibility with browsers other than Chrome.

    Google is the new nicorsoft of embrace and extend.... and kill

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  4. Re:URL Shortener by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google claims existing links are going to keep working; you just won't be able to make any new ones.

    Of course, what people forget is that these short URLs usually rely on the TLD of a foreign country, in this case Greenland.

    This potentially places all goo.gl links under the control of Greenland. Now, I don't expect them to do anything bad, but how many other link shorteners exist based on other countries' TLDs? How many of these countries will always be friendly? There's really no way to know.

    Avoid using link shorteners.