Slashdot Mirror


Over Half of Norway Car Sales Are Now Electric (reuters.com)

The Norwegian Road Federation (NRF) said on Monday that almost 60 percent of all new cars sold in the country last month were fully electric, "a global record as the country seeks to end fossil-fueled vehicles sales by 2025," reports Reuters. From the report: Exempting battery engines from taxes imposed on diesel and petrol cars has upended Norway's auto market, elevating brands like Tesla and Nissan, with its Leaf model, while hurting sales of Toyota, Daimler and others. In 2018, Norway's fully electric car sales rose to a record 31.2 percent market share from 20.8 percent in 2017, far ahead of any other nation, and buyers had to wait as producers struggled to keep up with demand.

The surge of electric cars to a 58.4 percent market share in March came as Tesla ramped up delivery of its mid-sized Model 3, which retails from 442,000 crowns ($51,400), while Audi began deliveries of its 652,000-crowns e-tron sports utility vehicle. The sales figures consolidate Norway's global lead in electric car sales per capita, part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas to transform to a greener economy.

345 comments

  1. Proof of viability by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.

    Norway put in the infrastructure. Charging everywhere. EVs work great there.

    Well done Norway.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Proof of viability by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      I concur, they do great despite the hostile climate.

      Btw: Am I the only one not receiving slashdot reply notifications anymore?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Very little of this is significant and barely even true. I live there. Most Norwegian live in areas where is just goes under freezing for 3-4 months at most, heavy snow is uncommon, cleared very effectively and few people commute very far at all.

      They are a success because of tax. Petrol cars have a 100% tax, electric have zero, so a Telsa cost a similar amount to a medium sized car, a Leaf was cheaper than a well equipped hatchback. Plus they travel free on the toll roads and Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending. In fact it was so successful the government had significant issues with the hole in the budget caused by the lack of income from reduced taxable car sales.

    3. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably don't have to suffer from the more extreme cold in the east due to the proximity of the sea. Didn't some Slashdot submission recently state 40% drop of battery capacity under low temperatures? Norway is also a clean electricity exporter, which was curiously left from this summary. That way the EVs are a perfect match for the economy.

    4. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, not that severe weather, while it's often below freezing, it's not extremely cold. Most of Norway is a thin strip of land along the ocean, and the Gulf Stream make the temperatures very moderate for the latitude.
      Yes, you can find ski lifts on the beach at the far end of the fjords (really, I've seen them), but this does not mean that they experience the temperatures of North Dakota.
      Now winter is really depressing, with no to little sunlight for weeks, especially in the North.

    5. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending.

      You need to bring in more diversity like Sweden and pay everything for them, that will solve that problem.

    6. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Make the ability to eating Surströmming part of the visa check.

    7. Re:Proof of viability by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      If only batteries warmed themselves up when charging/discharging.

      Resistive-element technology to warm them up in advance? At least 100 years away!

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      ...and if only there existed such a thing as insulation? Surely that's a fable as well.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Proof of viability by Sique · · Score: 2

      Insulation only helps so much. You can slow down the cooling, but you can't block it entirely. The insulation can't be too think otherwise it gets too heavy for a car. I would guess that after 24 hrs, a battery has cooled down to the environmental temperature, no matter what insulation you put in place.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    10. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not receiving slashdot reply notifications either.

    11. Re:Proof of viability by LabRatty · · Score: 2

      Insightful? None of these are the actual reasons for the success. All about money, lower cost of ownership.

    12. Re:Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Extra battery insulation or "region-specific" battery insulation/thermal solution means that heating needs are severely reduced. It should match well the concept of electric cars being connected in parking spots, which is the likely way forward with BEVs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    13. Re:Proof of viability by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently several people didn't get your joke.

      Actually the other classic anti-EV argument, the off-grid remote cabin with no possibility of solar or wind power, is actually a thing in Norway too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Proof of viability by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well done at the tax rate. Thats all that happened. A huge new tax on non electric car sales.
      Making the population to have to save up and get an electric car. Pay a huge new tax on a non electric car.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:Proof of viability by quenda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.

      Norway put in the infrastructure. Charging everywhere. EVs work great there.

      Well done Norway.

      You forget to add: Norway has the billions of tons of oil exports to pay for it.

    16. Re:Proof of viability by brinkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      They have this problem as well with fossil fueled cars, that is why many cars in colder climates (e.g. Scandiavian countries, Canada) are equipped with a block heater. My Volvo has one, plug it into mains an hour or two before you leave and a 550 Watt element in the engine block (replaces a freeze plug) will bring the coolant 20-30 degrees centigrade above ambient temperature. When plugged into a charger, many electric cars will do the same, they will pre-heat the batteries and heat up the car's interior when it's cold, to save battery consumption while on the move. Conversely, when it is hot summer, they will turn on the a/c.

      --
      Omnis basim vester nobis compete sunt.
    17. Re:Proof of viability by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Nope. Been going on for a few days now.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    18. Re:Proof of viability by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Not really. These people are buying $80,000+ cars because there are other benefits, including toll-free roads, HOV-lane access, free parking, and free charging. This is just rich people buying convenience.

    19. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, they shouldnt have to learn anything about your culture or language. You should change all forms and signs to include their language.

    20. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      Except the one thing you don't mention is that it only goes down to -3C. Isn't that the important thing about EVs? That they don't handle the cold very well?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    21. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be not as much of a laudable result as can be assumed from a knee jerk reaction. Norway has the HIGHEST gas prices in Europe as well as extremely cheap electricity from all the hydro. Yet still ONLY HALF the new cars are electric. That is the real kicker.

    22. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      It only goes down to -3C in Norway.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    23. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      If only they came with a fireplace to create cabin heat.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    24. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      I wear a t-shirt and shorts outside when it is -3C; as cold as Norway gets.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re:Proof of viability by Jzanu · · Score: 2

      Entirely Wrong. Just yesterday it reached -4 (C) at 700. Past lows routinely reach -5 (C) earlier this year. Total terms for lows recorded in history was -32.5 (C).

    26. Re:Proof of viability by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Well, actually the -32.5 (C) was last February. The still very recent historical low for Norway was actually -51.2 (C) in 1999. See? Repeating your talking point doesn't make it true. Research and data - these are keys to understanding reality.

    27. Re:Proof of viability by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Very little of this is significant and barely even true. I live there. Most Norwegian live in areas where is just goes under freezing for 3-4 months at most, heavy snow is uncommon, cleared very effectively and few people commute very far at all.

      It's all relative though. If I have one day where it's still freezing by noon I consider that pretty darn cold nowadays. What you consider not so bad a winter, many people on here would consider pretty severe. I've lived in 3 countries and never seen more than 7cm of snow fall, I'm sure 7cm is nothing to you though . I've seen how 3 inches can cause havoc on a city not prepared for snow. Heck, I've driven in my car behind a dump truck that had two men standing in the back shoveling sand on to the road as it slowly rolled forwards- that's the best remedy the city I lived in had to deal with the snow (that was in the mid-South, US). They didn't even have salt. "Heavy Snow is uncommon" vs "Heavy Snow would bring the city to a complete grinding halt."

      What people were worried about is that sub-freezing temps would make the electric car not work. Norway has definitely proven this wrong.

      There are few heavily populated places on earth that have REALLY severe weather- there's a reason most Norwegians live in the less severe parts of the country, I'm sure. Nonetheless, electric cars have proven they can do well in Norway, they've proven they can do well in almost any HEAVILY-POPULATED area. Maybe they won't do as well North of Trondheim (maybe they would), but people in those conditions represent a very small percent of the world's population.

      They are a success because of tax. Petrol cars have a 100% tax, electric have zero, so a Telsa cost a similar amount to a medium sized car, a Leaf was cheaper than a well equipped hatchback. Plus they travel free on the toll roads and Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending. In fact it was so successful the government had significant issues with the hole in the budget caused by the lack of income from reduced taxable car sales.

      Aye, and that's a good model for the rest of us to follow.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    28. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could directly explain the forms like they do in parts of the US but I suppose if you want immigrants as unhappy as possible you wouldn't even bother.

    29. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Those are very abnormal lows for Norway. How many times has it gone below a problem state for EVs which is -8C? I would live with an EV at -30C if it was only that temperature two days a year. It's a bit different than living with it for three months of the year.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    30. Re:Proof of viability by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      but what are they going to do when the "Dunkelflaute" comes? No sun in winter, no wind anymore, and all the water power plants frozen??

      I expect a drastic increase of birth rate next winter!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Average low in Oslo: -11C
      Average low in Bergen: 4C
      Ok admittedly an EV may start to have problems at -11C but still not very cold. I think I could drive in a car and not heat the cabin at all at -11C.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    32. Re:Proof of viability by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No idea what your -3C meme is about.
      Norway is big, there are plenty of places where it goes below -30C.

      Perhaps Oslo only was -3C last winter?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    33. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Average temperature in Norway in the last 5 years has never gone below -10C. Cold there is a temporary inconvenience and not a permanent fixture.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    34. Re:Proof of viability by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Not really. These people are buying $80,000+ cars because there are other benefits, including toll-free roads, HOV-lane access, free parking, and free charging. This is just rich people buying convenience.

      You think the majority of Norweigan's are rich?

      Admit it, the electric car is winning. Give it a decade and no-one will be surprised to hear of electric cars topping ICE cars in ANY country. It is the future- they just make more sense than ICE in almost every way.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    35. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oslo never goes below an average low of 4C. Bergen has an average low of -10C. If it gets that cold it's probably more of a temporary inconvenience than day to day living.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    36. Re:Proof of viability by Quakeulf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending.

      Not me, even though I don't have any debts, I still have to pay ludicrous amount of taxes towards a government that is privatising more for each year. I pay 51% tax on my SME doing software engineering, and for what? Erna Solberg's private jet? Nothing is free here unless you are useless and live on welfare. It's really fucking dumb.

    37. Re:Proof of viability by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe "heavy snow" means something different to you, but looking at Bjorn Nyland's videos there is plenty of snow and he has no trouble doing very long trips with multiple charges.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:Proof of viability by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forget to add: Norway has the billions of tons of oil exports to pay for it.

      So has the US. So has the UK. So have lots of countries. But only Norway did it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do always laugh at when people talk about how cold Scandinavia gets. I've not been to Norway, but spent a hell of a lot of time in Sweden. I've heard the far north gets pretty cold, but down in Stockholm where everybody actually lives, it's warmer than home. Barely need a coat in January.

    40. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the Chicago area and my neighbor has a Tesla. The dummy is a garage-hoarder so has to park in the driveway. There are a couple chargers at work which have EVs parked there every day, plus I see people all over Chicagoland with them. Do you people realize how damn cold it gets here?! We get a lot of snow. Also, judging by Chicago's urban sprawl and how irritable my coworkers are, I'm guessing the average commute around here is around an hour.

    41. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear is the best way to reinforce racism & xenophobia. Nice work!

    42. Re:Proof of viability by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      So, you have been there often enough to know that for sure?
      Sorry, you are an idiot.

      Even Germany has bad winter nights when we have -30C ...

      Oslo never goes below an average low of 4C.
      -10 versus +20 is an average of +15 ... perhaps you should check your math skills.
      Obviously half the numbers are below the average and the other half is above ...

      Frankly: no idea why you ride on the temperature meme anyway, it is completely irrelevant for your other arguments.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Then why is everyone telling me it is -30C there?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    44. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Why would an EV have any more problems with heavy snow than a regular car? If anything they would be better because they are heavier.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    45. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way Slashdot has morphed, I think they should start posting granola recipes and tofu snack ideas. I mean Slashdot is so earthy crunchy my ears hurt. An all vegan Slashdot would be awesome!

    46. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      We don't need to use a block heater now very often thanks to the invention of fuel injection. Carburetors would never start in the cold.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    47. Re:Proof of viability by quenda · · Score: 0

      Not a lot of point in electric cars, unless you have excess clean electricity, which Norway has in hydro.
      Might as well have efficient petrol cars. Anything but the SUVs and pick-ups that plague North America.

    48. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So they were able to get half the market in a country where ICEs are highly penalized, EVs are highly subsidized, and they are flush with oil to pay for everything. Personally I'm wondering why it wasn't higher.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    49. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok so let's go about it this way. When it goes to -30C in Norway HOW MANY CONSECUTIVE DAYS is it -30C? One or two days would just be an inconvenience with an EV.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    50. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I just made the same comment somewhere else. If EVs can truly work for everyone then it should be almost 100% in Norway.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    51. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want reply notifications from a website that's a time sink for people's personal amusement?

    52. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The insulation can't be too think otherwise it gets too heavy for a car.

      You do know that the ideal insulation material is a vacuum? Which weighs nothing. Batteries on the other hand are quite heavy.

    53. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway's weather is not severe at all. While colder than average of many places, the temperature is actually fairly stable and moderated. The lows are moderated and the highs are moderated by the jet stream and ocean. Norway's weather is actually fairly good for EVs since EXTREMES is what cause EVs problems and Norway doesn't have extreme cold or extreme heat.

      I don't think I need to tackle all the other points but needles to say, you are uninformed. EVs are popular in Norway because of basic economics. They are massively cheaper due to lack of taxes.

    54. Re:Proof of viability by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Norway also has a ridiculous level of taxes on vehicles. A level that makes them prohibitively expensive. So even if the batteries only worked half of the time, that is infinitely better than the none of the time that you would get from no car at all. I think your assessment of them "working great" requires a comparison that is not in evidence.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    55. Re:Proof of viability by brinkie · · Score: 2

      Regardless of what "we" don't need to use, many car parks in northern Scandinavian countries have power outlets for block heaters, which can be used to great benefit for heating up electric car batteries and keeping the car's interior warm. This mitigates a disadvantage of electric cars in polar conditions. By the way, Diesel and bio-ethanol powered engines really do need to be warmed up when starting in extreme cold, be it through glow plugs (Diesel), auxiliary heater (runs on fuel) or an electric heater. Bio-ethanol or E85 is very popular in Sweden and winters are pretty cold there, hence the block heater in my flexifuel (runs both on E85 and petrol) Volvo.

      --
      Omnis basim vester nobis compete sunt.
    56. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They have this problem as well with fossil fueled cars, that is why many cars in colder climates (e.g. Scandiavian countries, Canada) are equipped with a block heater.

      Finally - I'm amazed that it took someone this long to point out the truth. We have petrophiles complaining about cold batteries, and ignoring that some folks start fires under their oil sump to get their vehicles warm enough to start.

      In Alaska cities, parking meters have electrical outlets to plug your car into to keep it warm.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    57. Re:Proof of viability by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Btw: Am I the only one not receiving slashdot reply notifications anymore?"

      Ditto here. Also, I haven't been asked for years to pay up.

    58. Re:Proof of viability by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year"

      Yeah but sub-zero in Norway is not as cold as sub-zero in the US
      They use Celsius temperature there, 0C is 32 above in Fahrenheit.

    59. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Well done at the tax rate. Thats all that happened. A huge new tax on non electric car sales. Making the population to have to save up and get an electric car. Pay a huge new tax on a non electric car.

      At one point, the US had a way for people to largely write off their SUV's. One local woman drove around a Ford Expedition for her "candle business". The deduction was "limited" to $100,000 or your overall business income, whichever was less. http://www.selfemployedweb.com...

      So there is prior art.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    60. Re:Proof of viability by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "The way Slashdot has morphed, I think they should start posting granola recipes and tofu snack ideas."

      Or cat pictures. I wasted an hour or 2 to remove all the ad pictures and logos and the rest of the crap.
      Even though I read neither the article nor the summary, I want it clean.:-)

    61. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of point in electric cars, unless you have excess clean electricity, which Norway has in hydro. Might as well have efficient petrol cars. Anything but the SUVs and pick-ups that plague North America.

      Are you an abiotic petroleum theorist? Somehow there is an infinite supply of oil? Or just don't care because it will be someone else's problem?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re:Proof of viability by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Actually the other classic anti-EV argument, the off-grid remote cabin with no possibility of solar or wind power, is actually a thing in Norway too."

      They get 95% of their power from hydro and those all in the sticks as well.

    63. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ok so let's go about it this way. When it goes to -30C in Norway HOW MANY CONSECUTIVE DAYS is it -30C? One or two days would just be an inconvenience with an EV.

      They'd be just as much an inconvenience for a petrol fueled engines

      For everyone's entertainment - starting a diesel engine in cold weather by building a fire underneath it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    64. Re: Proof of viability by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, they shouldnt have to learn anything about your culture or language. You should change all forms and signs to include their language.

      That seems to be how it is in the US these days...

      IN the past, the US used to be "the great melting pot".....today, however, well.....I"m starting to feel great pressure to start learning Spanish out of necessity.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    65. Re:Proof of viability by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Or just don't care because it will be someone else's problem?

      This one.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:Proof of viability by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Extra battery insulation or "region-specific" battery insulation/thermal solution means that heating needs are severely reduced. It should match well the concept of electric cars being connected in parking spots, which is the likely way forward with BEVs."

      In lots of Northern European countries, people have electric block-heaters installed that they plug into the parking space connector or they have a Webasto or other heating system to pre-heat the car engine and/or the interior, commanded by timer or cellphone.
      I live in Luxembourg and even here I have installed a battery-loader plug on the outside of my gas-car, that I connect with a short cable in my front yard, just in case.
      So it always starts, even if it's -25 out there, which it last was in the past millennium.

      Also, lots of shift-workers have a Webasto because their car is always in the cold in the parking at work.
      It's so nice to come out when your car is already heated up, the snow is molten away and the windows are clean. Especially if your co-workers are still looking to identify their car under the snow.

      PS. I just realized that Webasto is probably not as known in the US so here's a link.
      https://www.webasto.com/int/

      It's a little gas or Diesel powered heating system, just as a big one in homes that is put somewhere in the cooling system of your car and thus heats your engine block and when it's hot enough, the interior heating opens and the interior is heated. You can also do it the other way round if you want.

    67. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be -30C in the mountains. Sometimes. It may be -20C in a major city once in a generation. They do get down to -10C regularly though, but not all winter. EV range is affected by those conditions, but it is still usable.

    68. Re: Proof of viability by es330td · · Score: 1

      Obama said immigrants are supposed to learn English. Are you telling me our Southern invaders didn't listen to him?

    69. Re:Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You do know that the ideal insulation material is a vacuum? Which weighs nothing

      Vacuum insulation in practice most of the time is about the weight of the structure that needs to contain the vacuum without buckling. Since modern BEV batteries are large and flat, vacuum insulation is a little bit problematic for them.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    70. Re:Proof of viability by es330td · · Score: 2

      Aye, and that's a good model for the rest of us to follow.

      What additional tax are you willing to pay to subsidize EV buyers?

    71. Re:Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      many car parks in northern Scandinavian countries have power outlets for block heaters, which can be used to great benefit for heating up electric car batteries and keeping the car's interior warm. This mitigates a disadvantage of electric cars in polar conditions.

      "Mitigates a disadvantage"? One would think it does more than that. The batteries could be heated from these power outlets *by charging them*. On the other hand, heating the engine block on an ICE car won't make it magically materialize more gasoline in its tank.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    72. Re: Proof of viability by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      IN the past, the US used to be "the great melting pot".....today, however, well.....I"m starting to feel great pressure to start learning Spanish out of necessity.

      Being an American used to be something to be proud of. The greatest nation on earth wasn't just advertising. Today, being an American is embarrassing. If you're traveling, it's better to have people assume that you're Canadian.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending.

      You need to bring in more diversity like Sweden and pay everything for them, that will solve that problem.

      LOL very true! We are willfully going to kill our economy and culture.

    74. Re:Proof of viability by GregMmm · · Score: 2

      OK, quick reality check. Electric cars will work in the cold. Also, they will not work as efficiently in the cold. Batteries just act like this. How many times do you have issues with a starting battery in an ICE vehicle in the summer as apposed to the winter? Still usually works, but not as well.

      The other really misleading part of this article is the numbers. Really, Tesla sold 5,822 cars and had 31.7% of the market share in a year? Not alot of demand for cars there, but if there is good alternatives I understand why.

    75. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending.

      Not me, even though I don't have any debts, I still have to pay ludicrous amount of taxes towards a government that is privatising more for each year. I pay 51% tax on my SME doing software engineering, and for what? Erna Solberg's private jet? Nothing is free here unless you are useless and live on welfare. It's really fucking dumb.

      Don't worry, the liberal propaganda machine is alive and well in the US. Soon you won't be alone.

    76. Re: Proof of viability by gtall · · Score: 1

      I see, so learning foreign languages, which would make it easier for U.S. companies to compete with foreign companies, is now something to be avoided. Hello Mr. Foot, you won't mind if I shoot your ass off, will you? Yeah, I know it is connected to me but I'm too stupid to care.

    77. Re:Proof of viability by brinkie · · Score: 1

      Of course, pre-heating an ICE will not affect the range of the car, but managing the temperature of an EV's battery pack will. Charging an EV from a simple block heater pole can be done if you have plenty of time, doesn't trip a fuse (especially if you are not the only one) and doesn't piss off the parking lot owner for upping his electricity bill :-D Though some have converted them to charge electric cars, see for instance this example from Finland: https://insideevs.com/finland-... Anyway, modern EV's do have sophisticated thermal management systems available, which eliminates the use of said block heater poles. https://insideevs.com/hyundai-...

      --
      Omnis basim vester nobis compete sunt.
    78. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not have enough experience.

      I've no idea how much time you've actually spent in Sweden, but the last 30 years or so, the winters generally speaking has been very mild, with a few exceptions. Temperatures of -20C or more (or less, depending on your level of pedantry) in December through March isn't abnormal at all for large parts of the country. When my parents were young, you could walk across to Denmark. Something the Swedish army also did to great effect once in the past.

      That said, that's not the real killer. Temperatures of -10C or so isn't that bad, but the Scandinavian countries are all pretty coastal to their nature, and let me tell you; there's a huge difference in how you perceive cold when the humidity goes up. I think that's a large part of why people say it's so cold here.

    79. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Or just don't care because it will be someone else's problem?

      This one.

      Yup, a lot of people have that attitude. The most "conservative guy I know, when asked about what kind of world our grandchildren might have, emphatically said "Fuck our Grandchildren, I want to use whatever I want, And if they die I don't fucking care - That's what I think of what I'm leaving for the future.

      He's dead now, ironically, people aren't too unhappy about that, They don't care.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    80. Re: Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only a handful of electric cars available. and people like to have variety in their styling, performance, configuration, packaging. So it's no surprise that there will still be internal combustion vehicles for the time being, given they only have a handful of electric choices. But that's going to change real fast.

    81. Re:Proof of viability by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      When it goes to -30C in Norway HOW MANY CONSECUTIVE DAYS is it -30C?
      About a month, or two.

      One or two days would just be an inconvenience with an EV.
      No? Cars are parked in Garages in our days ... And Teslas in particular have an heating algorithm to keep the battery warm ... I wonder how a "pro EV guy" can know nothing about the topic.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    82. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of electric cars north of Trondheim too. At work (in Tromsø, 69 deg 59' lat) a large part of the parking area is used for electric cars. The cold is not so severe, it's rarely below -15C and mostly just a few degrees below 0C during winter. Today it's about +5C. But yesterday night we got more than 50cm of snow. That created a few extra problems, mainly because of all the snow we got earlier this winter. But everybody got to work even so. Electric cars don't have more problems with anything relative to gasoline cars. And yeah the electricity all come from hydro.
      I still drive gasoline, but that's because I want a high-clearence 4wd that I can use *without* having to remove snow from my driveway in the morning.

    83. Re:Proof of viability by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      I assume there may be another factor that reduces the distance an electric vehicle can travel in cold weather in addition to reduced battery efficiency. When it's cold outside and one wants to be warm inside, the vehicle needs to have some source of cabin heat. Some of the heat could come from the warm electric motor and the warm battery but likely the vehicle will have an electric resistance heater. In places where summer temperatures are very high, such as the American southwest, air conditioning will be a necessity, also reducing travel distances from a full charge.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    84. Re: Proof of viability by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      I see, so learning foreign languages, which would make it easier for U.S. companies to compete with foreign companies, is now something to be avoided. Hello Mr. Foot, you won't mind if I shoot your ass off, will you? Yeah, I know it is connected to me but I'm too stupid to care.

      There's nothing wrong with learning other languages, I think it is a good think if you have the time and interest.

      But I don't think it should start to feel necessary to learn a foreign language just so you will be able to easily and ready understand things being spoken and written in your OWN country.

      And in the US, English has been the common language pretty much since inception.

      We should have made it the official US language by law long ago...but until recently, it wasn't thought to be needed, since everyone coming here used to generally try hard to learn English, and melted their cultures into the greater US culture.

      Somewhere in recent history, that has been lost...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    85. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much about starting in the cold as much as wear and tear on the engine and fuel efficiency until the engine has reached it's normal operating temperature. I'm not aware of fuel injection being particularly helpful for those issues.

    86. Re: Proof of viability by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      IN the past, the US used to be "the great melting pot".....today, however, well.....I"m starting to feel great pressure to start learning Spanish out of necessity.

      Because in the past cities did not have areas with names like "Chinatown" or "Little Italy".

      Oh wait....they did.

      Well then, clearly English in the US is dead and we're all speaking Chinese or Italian now.

      Oh wait....that didn't happen either.

      Damn, it's almost like your complaints aren't based on reality.

    87. Re:Proof of viability by balbeir · · Score: 1
      Nonono.

      According to this documentary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., the high tension lines you find in Norway are there to fence the trolls in.

      Nothing to do with delivering power to remote cabins.

    88. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could even wrap up the thermally sensitive components and passengers in an synthetically produced organic tissue that are fed jelly shots manufactured from organic waste - say, crapshots. Add some sound effects and we could call them "horses." They are already networked, so we shouldn't probably give them guns though..

    89. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the 5822 cars was for the month because of Model 3 but I may be wrong.

      Also fun fact, the lead acid batteries in cars degrade by not being fully charged in the summer and simultaneously exposed to the heat. This causes them to not be able to deliver the extra current required to start a cold engine in the winter. Cold isn't bad for batteries, heat and being idle at less than 95% charge is.

    90. Re: Proof of viability by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      By that token - shouldn't the person entering your country learn the language?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    91. Re: Proof of viability by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Because in the past cities did not have areas with names like "Chinatown" or "Little Italy".

      And areas like those two very small, niche and outlier examples do not represent the larger US.

      What I was concerned about, was this is happening outside of those areas more and more in the general US.

      Only a few places like NYC and SF have those types of those very specialized areas.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    92. Re: Proof of viability by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      By that token - shouldn't the person entering your country learn the language?

      Yes, they should, that's part of my complaint.

      Showing a proficiency in English is a requirement for citizenship in the US.

      And in most other countries, like Mexico...aside from some heavily tourist cities, they don't print everything in multiple languages, you need to learn the language of those lands in order to do anything there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    93. Re: Proof of viability by Grunschev · · Score: 3, Informative

      When you say that English "has been the common language pretty much since inception" you'd be ... wrong.

      A couple of examples: Until the USA entered WWI, there were more German language newspapers in Pennsylvania than English. Dwight David Eisenhower spoke German growing up. You may have heard of him.

      It's only recently that Americans (mostly right-wingers, mostly xenophobic) have insisted that everybody speak American. It's only recently that said assholes accost people in public and scream at them for not speaking American in their presence.

      I think it would be good for most folks to learn a little bit about their own country before spouting off. Why do you want to make Americans look stupid?

    94. Re:Proof of viability by swillden · · Score: 1

      Some of the heat could come from the warm electric motor and the warm battery but likely the vehicle will have an electric resistance heater.

      No, you get basically no significant heat from the motor or battery, because they don't produce much waste heat. So essentially all cabin heat comes from the battery. I think heat pumps are more common than resistive heat, though.

      In places where summer temperatures are very high, such as the American southwest, air conditioning will be a necessity, also reducing travel distances from a full charge.

      Not much. There is obviously some expenditure of energy for cooling, but the effect on range is really quite small. This is different from ICE vehicles, where running the AC does have a significant impact on fuel economy. I think the reason for the difference is that the ICEV's AC has to fight heat from the engine.

      Basically, ICE waste heat gives you "free" cabin heating during the winter and makes your AC work extra hard during the summer. Battery electric vehicles have no significant waste heat so heating does cost you range in the winter, but cooling has only minimal impact during the summer.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    95. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people need to travel long distances.
       
      Care to cite this? I've nearly driven the same distance entire length of the country in a single day. My guess is that most travelers in Norway don't need to drive from Kristiansand to Vadso over often. Most of the population of Norway lives within a couple hundred miles of each other.

      BTW; I know you won't cite shit because you can't. You're just another big talking Slashfaggot who knows next to nothing about the subject matter but want to talk big. Other posters here have soundly defeated most of your other claims. You're only still modded up because other Slashfags who want to believe your horseshit want to make your lies seem like facts. You're not insightful at all. It's just more groupthink goose stepping. A Slashdork specialty.

    96. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man! -4C? LOLzzzz. Where I live we've had WEEKS where it hasn't gotten above -15C.

      No, I don't live in Siberia or Alaska or the Yukon.... I live in Pittsburgh. While on the extreme side it's not so extreme as many think. This winter was mild but weeks where we don't get about 0F happen just about every winter. This year the worst streak year it stayed below -15C for about 10 days.

      -4C for a low on any one day is a joke.

    97. Re:Proof of viability by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      I think heat pumps are more common than resistive heat, though.

      It's my understanding that heat pumps for heating lose their efficiency over other fuels at 32 deg F, 0 deg C. In my area of Colorado there's a region outside the city where folks can't get natural gas and duel fuel heat pumps are used to heat homes. When the outside temperature reaches 32 deg F, the heating system switches to liquid propane or perhaps even electric resistance for heat. I would assume the same for electric vehicles - a switch to electric resistance heating.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    98. Re:Proof of viability by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of point in electric cars, unless you have excess clean electricity

      Except that garbage has been proven wrong time and time again and there are both financial and environmental reasons to go all electric even if your power is 100% coal fired.

    99. Re:Proof of viability by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The battery chemistry of a lead acid battery is different than lithium ion, but consider also that it isn't just the battery that has problems with cold in ICE engines. Part of the problem is the battery itself, but also the battery has to do more work, as the engine is more difficult to get started in cold conditions, which is why in colder parts they have engine warmers to overcome this. Battery operated cars on the other hand can self heat the batteries, and charging them overnight helps with keeping them warm as well.

    100. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oslo can get pretty cold, but most of the rest of the population lives out on the west coast where warm ocean currents keep it reasonably warm (single digit minus C temperatures most winter mornings, despite the latitude) and the prevailing easterly wind means the mountain range inland gets most of the snowfall, leaving the coast fairly dry.

    101. Re:Proof of viability by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In the USA a person had the freedom to consider a SUV. An electric car. A classic car. A new car. An older car that had been sold.
      Transport at a fair price for working people. People who needed a SUV. People who wanted a SUV. Not buying a SUV and finding a different car.
      A car for work. A car to get to work. A car to travel all over the USA.
      Not altering the price by using a tax rate to force people into only having the ability to pay for a new electric car.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    102. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A tax on fossil fuel powered cars, obviously.

    103. Re: Proof of viability by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      And areas like those two very small, niche and outlier examples do not represent the larger US.

      Have you noticed all the cities that end in -burg? There's a reason...and it's the residents were speaking German.

      So, yeah, it did apply to a large area of the US.

      Only a few places like NYC and SF have those types of those very specialized areas.

      Now. But it turns out, time didn't start when you started paying attention.

    104. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In the USA a person had the freedom to consider a SUV. An electric car. A classic car. A new car. An older car that had been sold. Transport at a fair price for working people. People who needed a SUV. People who wanted a SUV. Not buying a SUV and finding a different car. A car for work. A car to get to work. A car to travel all over the USA. Not altering the price by using a tax rate to force people into only having the ability to pay for a new electric car.

      Now go back and read what I wrote. You could write off 100 percent of your Large SUV up to 100,000 dollars. Money. In your pocket that you would not have if you bought a similarly priced car. And people had pretend businesses so they could do that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    105. Re:Proof of viability by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      Decent house heat pumps work down to -25 deg C, and are twice as efficient as resistive heaters at -10.

    106. Re:Proof of viability by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Not a lot of point in electric cars, unless you have excess clean electricity," - Even with coal power, EVs are still cleaner. Remember when processing gasoline, the refineries use a lot of electricity before you even look at the tail pipe emissions, then you have to transport that fuel to the stations and they use electricity to pump the gas. One refinery here in the UK says they use as much electricity as a small city every year. You can't just compare the tailpipe emissions.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    107. Re:Proof of viability by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Does that mean "God" will fix the mess you contribute to for your progeny to live a healthier life?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    108. Re:Proof of viability by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      As you are so interested in Norway and cold running of EVs, go to Youtube and search out Bjorn Nyland as he has loads of documented winter running of EVs in Norway.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    109. Re:Proof of viability by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Its a supply problem, the waiting time for new EVs is huge. They cannot service the demand as yet being such a relatively new product. Why is that so hard to understand?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    110. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      We have block heaters too, except they cycle on and off every 10 minutes so you can't possibly use them for anything but a block heater. Also they give tickets for using an interior car warmer.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    111. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Like I said above, where I live you get 10 minutes of 'on' power and 10 minutes of 'off' because they only want you to use it for block heaters. How long would that take to charge a car? You would get a ticket for plugging it in too because they give tickets for anything but block heaters. This is in -30C.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    112. Re: Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That depends on the power. How much power are we talking about? And the fine seems rather hypocritical.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    113. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's more about heating the cabin to 23C and still expecting it to have the same range, not starting it. I don't care about starting it, I'll put it in my garage. Fuel injected cars don't need block heaters anyway.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    114. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well yeah if most people park them in a garage and only drive them short distances, of course they work for those people! But the fact that it only works for those people is why there is only 50% adoption in a country that practically gives you an EV and charges you double for an ICE.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    115. Re: Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's their property, they can do what ever they want. It's regular 120V 2-phase household power.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    116. Re:Proof of viability by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      It's getting higher and higher. Look at the trend.

      2011 -> 1.6%
      2012 -> 3.1%
      2013 -> 5.6%
      2014 -> 13.8%
      2015 -> 22.4%
      2016 -> 29.1%
      2017 -> 39.2%
      2018 -> 60.2%

      If you want more metrics, or a handy graph, there is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    117. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to know what your metrics are meant to represent, or what anything in the article has to do with what I said.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    118. Re:Proof of viability by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      You said

      So they were able to get half the market in a country where ICEs are highly penalized, EVs are highly subsidized, and they are flush with oil to pay for everything. Personally I'm wondering why it wasn't higher.

      The trend I listed indicates that the numbers are increasing at quite the pace, so it seems your estimation was correct and the numbers will be higher this year. I guess it takes time to make everyone aware of the incentive or whatever it is that is driving the adoption rate.

    119. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oh I see you were extrapolating. Yeah I didn't realize they were having a supply problem. That part has already been cleared up.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    120. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's more about heating the cabin to 23C and still expecting it to have the same range, not starting it. I don't care about starting it, I'll put it in my garage. Fuel injected cars don't need block heaters anyway.

      There are many more reasons to heat than just the block. Oil can get pretty sludgy in serious cold, and batteries will show their age and need help (ironic that heat is what kills batteries, but they need heat when cold exposes the damage.

      We have people driving Teslas in my area of Pennsylvania. It doesn't get super cold, but the teens ans single digits happen. Guy I see every day is in there without a coat, so it looks like his heater is working.

      I look at the whole EV thing as just another type of vehicle. Some people like Pickup trucks, some sporty cars. I'm a Jeep guy myself. I buy them for reasons. I don't expect everyone else to buy jeeps for my reasons. An EV Jeep would suit me just fine, and would keep me warm in the winter. And I'm waiting.... I've got a solar recharge system planned.

      But point is, your wishes and my wishes can be very valid points, but High latitudes and offroading are kinda like edge cases.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    121. Re: Proof of viability by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      In many places, even what you can do with your property is decided by law and courts. Discriminatory rules often draw frowns from laws and judges.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    122. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The problem is, what happens when more automakers decide they only want to make EVs? Many people here like to go to their cabins 1-3 hours away and go with a big group. If there are 10 people up there for the weekend all with EVs in the cold, how will that ever work? How can it be a good thing that there are three ICEs left on the market? Already VW is doing only EVs and sales of ICE small vehicles are disappearing. I think this may be a big change of way of life for some people and it kind of feels like companies won't give a crap.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    123. Re: Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, pretty sure a lot of people complain about it and yet it still is. Legally they can't make you pay, but they can tow your vehicle if you have outstanding tickets and park on their property anywhere. And they own 90% of the lots.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    124. Re:Proof of viability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An EV Jeep would suit me just fine, and would keep me warm in the winter. And I'm waiting.... I've got a solar recharge system planned.

      Exactly when did you sustain your brain injury?
      You mind providing some specifications for your planned solar recharge system?

    125. Re:Proof of viability by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The problem is, what happens when more automakers decide they only want to make EVs?

      Assuming that you are in the US, we have a subset of people who detune their diesel engine pick-m-ups so they can "roll coal" whenever they see a Prius driver. They also spend a shitload of money on those trucks - it's a huge profit center.

      I'm pretty certain you'll be able to buy a petrofueled vehicle in our lifetimes.

      Many people here like to go to their cabins 1-3 hours away and go with a big group.

      I have a jeep because the state of EV's is not ready for my purposes - but you appear to be demanding that they not be produced because of your particular driving habits.

      The state of petrofueled cars in the US of A is good for the time being. But unless you believe in abiotic oil, the supply is not infinite, and most people aren't going to pay the spiraling prices.

      Because the whole issue with EV's isn't some people got together and decided to d osomething unecessary. It is the fact that petrofuels are not going to last forever. And we'll need some alternative. NatGas might suffice for some, Some folks are even toying with wood gas. Back in WW2 in Europe you could see cars with little trailers behind them burning wood to make CO which they would then burn in their engines.

      Because if you wait until the supply is about run out, you'll be playing catch up. Gasoline and diesel are awesome and energy dense fuels. But like all things there isn't an infinite supply of them. And when the shit really hits the fan, the very expensive supplies left will be a strategic element, and you and your friends will need to find a different way to get to camp because the fuel will be going to national security applications like jet fighters and other aircraft that need that energy dense portable fuel.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    126. Re:Proof of viability by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      What I'd like is for the EV industry to make EVs just work like ICEs.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    127. Re:Proof of viability by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Apparently several people didn't get your joke.

      Sadly not it seems. There are a lot of people here very thin on a sense of humour.

      Actually the other classic anti-EV argument, the off-grid remote cabin with no possibility of solar or wind power, is actually a thing in Norway too.

      That can't work. Some dude on the internet told me it couldn't.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    128. Re:Proof of viability by swillden · · Score: 1

      I would assume the same for electric vehicles - a switch to electric resistance heating.

      The Nissan Leaf definitely has only a heat pump. Earlier models used resistive heating (exclusively), but switched to a heat pump for efficiency. And in my experience it works just fine down to about -10F (the coldest I've driven in). In fact, the model with the heat pump keeps me warmer at low temperatures than the previous version did.

      I just checked, though, and Tesla uses a resistive 400V, 10A resistive heater, not a heat pump.

      Also, most electric cars have resistive heating circuits in the seats. It's clearly more efficient to keep the passengers warm via direct contact, rather than warming the cabin air. With the seat heaters on, you can keep the cabin air a few degrees cooler and still be comfortable.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    129. Re:Proof of viability by Toshito · · Score: 1

      Well I've been driving for more than 30 years in Canada, and I've never had a car not starting when cold, and of the 20-something cars I have owned the vast majority didn't have a block heater. It was optionnal.

      In fact I discoverd by accident that my current car has one, when I saw the electric cord tucked away in the engine compartment.

      And when I say cold it's -35C (-30F)

      Sure it's a good idea to use the block heater so it's less traumatic for the engine, and you have hot air faster in the cabin. But if your car is in tune and it has a good battery it will start down to -40C (-40F) no problem.

      The engine will sound like an old tractor for a couple of minutes and you better not floor it until it's relatively warm otherwise it won't last long...

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    130. Re:Proof of viability by brinkie · · Score: 1

      Well, good for you that you didn't need it, but that is beside the point. In countries with a cold climate, you could use the existing infrastructure for block heaters to keep the electric car's battery and interior warm. This will be beneficial for the range in polar conditions, i.e. you can make more miles on a charge. btw where I live a block heater is completely useless because the temperature rarely drops below zero, though some 'muricans still think we all wear wooden shoes and ice-skate on the canals to work :P

      --
      Omnis basim vester nobis compete sunt.
  2. I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Cesare+Ferrari · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing their grid has a fair bit of gas based electricity generation, so although the headline is nice, i'm waiting for their fossil fuel dependence to really drop to show what is possible.

    1. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Cesare+Ferrari · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, a bit of digging says that they are almost entirely hydroelectric production, so this is an actual real reduction in fossil fuel dependance. Awesome!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99% of all the electricity in Norway comes from Hydro Plants.

    3. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Norway has a fair bit of hydro electric power. Also, Norwegian roads tend to vary between "hilly" to "steep", which is another win for electric motors. I doubt, if you look at it from a purely technical aspect, you could find a country better suited for electrical vehicles than Norway, so their prevalence is no surprise.

    4. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope, they have a lot of hydro. I spent a few weeks in Norway (not recently, it was ~40 years ago, before they became oil-rich and the price of everything skyrocketed), electricity was so cheap that lights were on 100% of the time. Basically the switches were only used to change light bulbs.
      I remember entering a hotel room in Tromsø, and I was so surprised that I counted the light bulbs (incandescent at the time): 43, all left on after cleaning while there was nobody inside!
      This was in July, in an area where there are over 20 hours of sunlight per day.

    5. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing their grid has a fair bit of gas based electricity generation, so although the headline is nice, i'm waiting for their fossil fuel dependence to really drop to show what is possible.

      Norway is a net exporter of oil and gas and produces 103.8% if it electricity using renewable resources.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Norway

    6. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Sique · · Score: 2

      The "fair bit" in this case is: more hydro electric power than the country actually uses, or more than 100 percent hydro powered.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      There is a path to independence from fossil fuels with the EVs. Solar and wind can produce enough energy for the world. Battery tech is improving for short term (days) storage. Pumped hydro and compressed air in abandoned mines for long term (months/seasonal). We are not there yet. But at least the movement is in the right direction.

      With gasoline cars, there is never an end. We have to get rid of diesel trucks and gasoline cars.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    8. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Freischutz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, a bit of digging says that they are almost entirely hydroelectric production, so this is an actual real reduction in fossil fuel dependance. Awesome!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But this is entirely offset by Norway being one of the biggest net contributors to CO2 emissions world wide through their oil exports.

    9. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, a bit of digging says that they are almost entirely hydroelectric production, so this is an actual real reduction in fossil fuel dependance. Awesome!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Good luck getting more dams built in the US to provide more hydroelectric power....

      The same folks pining for all electric cars and who hate fossil fuels will also do anything and everything they can to block new dams.

    10. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by mvreijn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, that and the fact that they can afford all of these huge expenditures in infrastructure and subsidies because they became rich through oil.

    11. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      We could produce enough power by plopping down a few nukes. Modern designs that can reuse some of the "spent" fuel we already have lying about.

      That would give us the time to perfect all those technologies that are not there yet and incrementally supplant the nukes as time goes by.

      What we are doing now is hoping for the lottery jackpot to happen while not wanting to sell auntie Mabel's villa on the hill because it has sentimental value.

    12. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil has the legitimate use of plastic production. It's not Norway's fault if some buyers abuse oil.

    13. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      > But this is entirely offset by Norway being one of the biggest net contributors to CO2 emissions world wide through their oil exports.

      Oil is a fungible commodity. If Norway wasn't supplying it, someone else would be (or we'd be burning more natural gas to make up the balance)... so CO2 would not be significantly impacted if they weren't exporting it.

      But they are moving away from burning it themselves, which is a net positive. They are also demonstrating viability of the technology, while establishing a market that both advances development and reduces cost of that technology. This is all good news.
      =Smidge=

    14. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by lgw · · Score: 0

      Norway is a massive oil exporter. Every drop of oil they don't burn in cars they export as oil instead. Norway moving to electric cars does nothing at all to reduce the overall problem because they just export the difference.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Norway is a massive oil exporter. Every drop of oil they don't burn in cars they export as oil instead. Norway moving to electric cars does nothing at all to reduce the overall problem because they just export the difference.

      The demand in oil won't go up over-seas because Norway is exporting a larger % of what they earn. In fact as electric cars are beginning to take a larger share of the market in many places, and power stations switch from using oil, the demand for oil will decrease. It won't go away completely any time soon- but demand for oil is going to drop- and production of oil will drop in many places too- to keep the prices from free falling.

      Oil is slowly fading away.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    16. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is an even better thing. They used the gains from their country for the good of the people, instead of for a few individuales that own shares in the company.

      Can you imagine that instead of the oil barons in Texas, they would have put that money into use for the people, to be used by the people? Or instead of the coalmine owners, used that money to re-educate the people now their jobs became useless.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by virtig01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every drop of oil not burned in Norway is a drop that might not be burned at all: if not used as fuel, it could instead be used in plastics, lubricants, or petrochemicals.

    18. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Yes, that and the fact that they can afford all of these huge expenditures in infrastructure and subsidies because they became rich through oil.

      No, a number of other countries can afford these measures too without access to huge oil profits. The idea is to accelerate the adoption of an emerging and superior new technology. On the other side of the coin the US for example can afford to subsidise its oil industry, not sure why that is necessary since the US oil industry would be profitable without them but there you go. The US government is of the opinion that oil companies are in such dire need of subsidies because they were already making altogether too much profit without them.

    19. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why, as an insurance salesman, I only feed my kids insurance for breakfast lunch and dinner. Using money earned in insurance for food or any other purpose would be hypocritical. Cause, you know, capitalism and all I guess.

    20. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      That is an even better thing. They used the gains from their country for the good of the people, instead of for a few individuales that own shares in the company.

      Can you imagine that instead of the oil barons in Texas, they would have put that money into use for the people, to be used by the people? Or instead of the coalmine owners, used that money to re-educate the people now their jobs became useless.

      Well they whatever the Noggies put their Oil dollars into it wasn't the road network. Norway's road network sucks ass considering the amount of oil dollars they have and road tolls they collect. My advice to anybody driving anywhere in Norway North of Trondheim is to drive as close to your destination as you can inside Sweden and then pop over the border into Norway as needed. The Swedish roads are better, the max speed is between 30-50 kph higher, the average speed is between 40 and 60 kph higher and there are hardly any road tolls. The interesting thing is that if you plot a route from Lofoten to Oslo all of the alternative routes are through Sweden. The longest Swedish route is 23 hours of driving, as opposed to 21 hours if you go through Norway despite the Swedish route being over 200 km longer and taking you all the way to the Baltic coast. Realistically, because the Swedes allow you to drive at 100-120 kph, you can overtake slow moving trucks on Swedish roads which you often can't in Norway due to the roads being single lane and you are not constantly on pins and needles about speed cameras and a draconian speeding fine, you'll probably be faster going through Sweden.

    21. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by lgw · · Score: 1

      There's a nice pipe dream.

      Every drop of oil Norway pumps is burned. That's the world we live in. Doesn't matter whether it's burned domestically or elsewhere, it will be burned. Norway could pump less oil, but someone else would just pump more.

      Feelgood measures are nice and all, but they don't actually matter. Reducing oil consumption in China and India as those economies emerge is all that really matters. That's the real world you actually live in, sorry it's less pleasant than your fantasy world.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happens when that "good for the people" is abused? "Venezuel-ed"?

      Nobody should have to endued being Venezuela-ed!

    23. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Petrol is more valuable as chemical feedstock. Do you not know where plastic comes from? Bioplastic like biofuels exist but are marginal.

    24. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if what you say is true, you are missing the point that was trying to be made. Without the OIL profits then they can't be "GREEN" and "superior". That is like being a drug manufacturer and dealer while being clean and bitching about, acting superior to, and calling for the elimination of drug users. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

      I can't wait to see how they cope with the huge migrant population stretching their oil profits per capita thinner and thinner. The morons act like they are so superior but the reality is they have a gigantic county to exploit for natural resources with a (currently) tiny population and they STILL pay a huge % tax. I guess they don't realize if you add a bunch of non-working migrants you end up with less tax money per capita and less oil profits per capita. Quick way to drain the county's resources.

    25. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      >Every drop of oil Norway pumps is burned. That's the world we live in. Doesn't matter whether it's burned domestically or elsewhere, it will be burned. Norway could pump less oil, but someone else would just pump more.

      You're correct in this statement.

      > Reducing oil consumption in China and India as those economies emerge is all that really matters.

      You are incorrect in this one. Every drop not burned is a drop that's not burned, and it doesn't matter who is the first to cut back.

      And for the record, China has been doing more than most countries to curtail their reliance on fossil fuels... not for environmental reasons, but because they understand that it's politically and economically advantageous to not rely on an energy source they have to import, and thus have no control over, and which will only get more expensive as time goes on.
      =Smidge=

    26. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinging Norway for exporting oil and calling that a CO2 emission is a bit of a cheat. The CO2 is emitted when it's BURNT! Surely that should be counted where it's actually used. Otherwise they're counting it twice or the country burning it is getting a free pass on emissions.

    27. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Every drop of oil Norway pumps is burned." - can you provide a link to that, it'll make an interesting read.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    28. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by lgw · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect in this one. Every drop not burned is a drop that's not burned, and it doesn't matter who is the first to cut back.

      The commodities market is worldwide. The price controls the amount burned. When one person burns less, the price falls and another burns more.

      Now, if Norway pumped less oil that might have an effect. Likely not this decade, as we have a surfeit of production, but there have been times in the past where supply was constrained, and one producer making less wasn't an excuse for another to make more.

      And for the record, China has been doing more than most countries to curtail their reliance on fossil fuels... not for environmental reasons, but because they understand that it's politically and economically advantageous to not rely on an energy source they have to import, and thus have no control over, and which will only get more expensive as time goes on.

      Just a reminder: never believe anything the Chinese government says about anything.

      Sure, neither India nor China want to be the bitch of the oil producing countries. Doesn't mean there's a lot they can do about it, but the extent that they do build a less oil-dependent infrastructure is the future of carbon emission. Maybe they'll do great, maybe they won't, but it's all about them and they don't care at all about global warming. It may end well due to other political considerations, though, or some technological breakthrough.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... by lgw · · Score: 1

      What other end destination do you see? Generally, oil-based lubricants are eventually burned as bunker fuel. Do you think plastic represents permanent sequestration of carbon? Do you think it's a non-trivial percentage of oil use?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I can tell, turning CO2 back into gasoline using solar power towers in deserts, and "burning" that in fuel cells, is still more efficient than the whole solar-to-hvdc-to-battery-charging-to-battery-using-to-electric-motors procedure.

    And cleaner too, given that fuel cells only produce CO2 and water.

    I also wonder how much compressing the CO2 in a tank in the car would cost, efficiency-wise.

    Because batteries sure are one *shitty* low-density form of energy storage. (Not that I'm not open to improvements. When they come in at least an order of magnitude.)

    1. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by Sique · · Score: 1

      In a country which generates more electric energy from hydroplants than it actually uses (Norway is a net exporter of electric energy), fuel cells just don't make sense at all.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, turning CO2 back into gasoline using solar power towers in deserts, and "burning" that in fuel cells, is still more efficient than the whole solar-to-hvdc-to-battery-charging-to-battery-using-to-electric-motors procedure.

      "More efficient" how? Even just electrolysis+fuel cell with pure hydrogen has a 40% round trip efficiency, and that's even before you try to make a hydrocarbon out of it. "The whole solar-to-hvdc-to-battery-charging-to-battery-using-to-electric-motors" is somewhere around 80% or so.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you are simply wrong. Plain and simple. If this is what you think then you haven't looked very carefully. Anything converted to gasoline or hydrogen or anything like that is vastly, immensely, ridiculously more wasteful than using batteries. Batteries as in the 80% from grid to batteries to wheels. Hydrogen is something like 20 - 25% and synthetic gasoline is even worse.

    4. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Even just electrolysis+fuel cell with pure hydrogen has a 40% round trip efficiency,
      No, depending how you do it it is between 65% and 70% ... high end systems obviously reaching over 90%.

      No idea where this misconception that fuel cells or electrolysis is inefficient comes from. Must be a 1970s school myth which hold up till today.

      If you do it at home with a simple battery and two cables going into water you already are around 70% efficiency ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      No, depending how you do it it is between 65% and 70%

      Between 65% and 70% would necessitate both the electrolyser and the fuel cell to be on average 82% efficient. This is simply not happening with existing technology. Practical fuel cells reach 50%-60% efficiency. Meanwhile, practical electrolyzers need around 45 kWh per kg of generated hydrogen, so they're around 70%-75% efficient. So the overall roundtrip from electricity to hydrogen to electricity is between 35%-45% for pure hydrogen.

      high end systems obviously reaching over 90%.

      I'm not even going to comment on that.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      82% * 75% is already 64% ...

      I think no further comment is needed ....

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      82% * 75% is already 64% ...

      And where do you get those 82% and 75% when in reality you're offered equipment with 75% and 50%? :-p 75% * 50% = 37.5%.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You gave the numbers ...
      No idea why you suddenly drop them to 75% and 50% ... why would a fuel cell only be 50% efficient?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:I think fuel cells + recycling CO2 is greener. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You seem to be somewhat confused. I first gave you the HYPOTHETICAL numbers that you'd NEED to reach your alleged "between 65% and 70%" of round-trip efficiency, namely around 82% for both (or a geometric average), since 82% * 82% = ~67%.

      THEN I cited REAL-WORLD figures, which are around 45 kWh to synthesize 1 kg of hydrogen - around 74% efficiency considering hydrogen's LLV for electrolysis, and 44%-57% efficiency from hydrogen's LLV to electricity in a REAL-WORLD fuel cell. That's a REAL-WORLD round-trip efficiency of around 32%-42%.

      I did not "suddenly drop" anything, the efficiencies are still the same. I've taken fuel cell system efficiencies from PEM Fuel Cells: Theory And Practice, 2nd Ed., Table 9-7 on page 367, and electrolyzer power use from the energy.gov page I linked above.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  4. Plot twist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    There are only three cars in Norway. The rest of the country moves around by skiing or dog sled.

  5. Even if less efficient ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's not like there in not enough sunlight.

    I can only guess, that the EU wants independence from the Fremen. ;)
    But the US has plenty of sunny desert states.
    And the EU surely has no shortage of wind in the north sea.

    I guess it's only a thing of what's fashionable right now.
    Like currently the fashion is to play the victim role and shame when bullying. Or to sell paper bags that kill trees now instad of plastic ones that can use previously killed trees or be made from recently killed ones too.

  6. Oil is made from dead animals though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're thinking of coal.

    But I guess that's technically possible too...

  7. They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And oil. To exchange for foreign green electrictiy.

    And they burn their garbage for energy.

    And they don't have a big population either. There are more people in my city that their entire country.
    I bet if my city was surrounded by waterfalls instead of even more people, we couls do that too.
    But then again, we'd probably be a lake. ;)

    1. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by ivano · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't more people make it easier??

    2. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      And they burn their garbage for energy.

      Getting rid of garbage is probably the greater motivation. It's not like they have too few energy sources.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And oil. To exchange for foreign green electrictiy.

      One source[1] says Norway produced about 150BkWH of electricity in 2018; nearly all of it from hydro. It exported about 22BkWH and imported about 6BkWH. Doesn't appear to me that they need to exchange oil for electricity.

      Looks more to me like they're exchanging oil for Teslas, sovereign wealth, and giving Norwegians one of the highest standards of living in the world.

      And they burn their garbage for energy.

      And they don't have a big population either. There are more people in my city that their entire country.

      Yeah, let that sink in.

      I

      bet if my city was surrounded by waterfalls instead of even more people, we couls do that too.

      Orly? You have lots of hydro power? And giant oil and gas reserves too? What are you doing with it?

      But then again, we'd probably be a lake. ;)

    4. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Even so, electricity isn't free. So when you do burn trash, capturing that heat and putting it into warming homes is a nice bonus (it's distributed via hot water pipes).

    5. Re: They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread has remained surprisingly civil somehow. Even our resident oil barons have provided clear ideas in a polite manner. Are the trolls all asleep still? Reminds me of /. posts pre-2016. I miss those.

    6. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      And they burn their garbage for energy.

      Well, gee, when the idea of burning garbage for energy was promoted in the film "Back to the Future" everybody seemed to like it.

      And I, for one, would have more of an incentive to take out the garbage every week, if my car could run on it.

      I bet if my city was surrounded by waterfalls instead of even more people, we could do that too. But then again, we'd probably be a lake. ;)

      Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yër ?

      See the løveli lakes

      The wøndërful telephøne system

      And mäni interesting furry animals

      Including the majestik møøse

      A Møøse once bit my sister...

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re: They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      BkWh must use some new metric prefix I've never encountered.

    8. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "And they don't have a big population either. "

      You mean that this way you can see that you don't need half a billion people paying exorbitant taxes to do it if even a small socialist EU country can do it?

    9. Re: They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "This thread has remained surprisingly civil somehow. Even our resident oil barons have provided clear ideas in a polite manner. Are the trolls all asleep still? Reminds me of /. posts pre-2016. I miss those."

      You should have been here the last millennium.
      Those were the days.
      There were almost a dozen people who actually read the summary and even 1 or 2 times somebody actually read TFA!

    10. Re: They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Brazillions of kilowatthours.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      It certainly does. The average daily North American commute is well below the maximum range of most charged EVs. But we'll hear all kinds of stories about how the majority of North Americans own cabins in the woods, or something.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Will do moose stuff for money"

    13. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure what you are trying to say.

      Norway has exorbitantly high taxes.
      They're not in the EU (keep that in mind when thinking about the exorbitant taxes).
      Their population is relatively small.
      Their natural resources are bountiful.

      The last two things probably keep their social systems within their market economy running.

    14. Re:They havd shitloads of hydroelecticity. by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      In terms of the last two resources/population is the important statistic not either two. The USA has a large population but larger natural resources too. It might have a similar resources/population quotient (although perhaps a different mix of resources, e.g. Norway not known for its large maize crop).

  8. Huh? Paper bags are a new thing?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had them since the 80s around here.

    We only use them to move groceries from the shopping cart to the trunks of our cars, and then into the house later though. So it usually does not matter that they are so shitty and rip if they so much as dream of dampness.

  9. Massive government intervention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key ingredient here.

    1. Re:Massive government intervention by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes a AC a huge new tax to sway the population to have to pay for a new electric car.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Car Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Definitely sounds like your average Joe cant afford those. @ $50k US?

    1. Re:Car Prices by teg · · Score: 1

      Definitely sounds like your average Joe cant afford those. @ $50k US?

      The median salary in Norway is more than $60k USD, and both adult family members work - so $120k total, pre tax. Compared to fossil cars, you would save on fuel, road pricing and the yearly road tax.

      .

  11. None. They are only 5 million people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Teir "cities", like Bergen for example, look more like towns in Alaska.

    And they are surrounded by waterfalls.

    1. Re:None. They are only 5 million people. by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair Alaska only has 700,000 people and is much, much bigger than Norway.

      The funny thing is New Jersey has 9 million people and not even half of Norway's size:

      New Jersey = 7,787 sq mi
      Norway = 125,020.651 sq mi

      Not that this isn't a good accomplishment but when your as small as it is (or it's Baltic state neighbors) it's not gold star worthy.

  12. Cars are expensive in Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    An entry level manual VW Golf / Honda Civic / Ford Focus type of car is 300,000 NoK - about $35,000.

    The very cheapest new cars you can buy are around $15,000 - $17,000 - and those are really for city driving only with 60-70hp 1-liter engines.

    A VW Golf electric is about the same price as a petrol one.

    1. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      A tax will do that.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Good! The petrol fueled vehicles externalize significant costs so a tax to pay for pollution remission is required for the market to actually operate. The alternative is information imbalance that causes price imbalance and freebies for the petrol vehicles.

    3. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Troll

      Paying for a more expensive car is taking money away from working people. Demanding they buy a new electric car for transport.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      No. This tax is a market mechanism packaging more of the total costs for each product. That in fact reduces deadweight losses from price inaccuracy.

    5. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RWNJ Huxley bitchslapped very nicely indeed.

    6. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That tax was a persons wage and savings. Money they could have put to some other use before a gov made them by a more expensive new electric car.
      Govs shaping free market forces using a new tax.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Cars are expensive in Norway by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of taxes on gas, gas guzzling cars, two seat cars, etc in Europe. I would pass doubt that most of their cost is externalized in Europe at this point.

  13. Norway is a bit of a special case here by svirre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Large EV sales in norway are due to subsidies to the tune of the equivalent of USD~10-30000 pr. car:

    * Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000)
    * Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars.
    * There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured)
    * Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)

    For usability: Most roads are limited to 80km/h and most drivers do not drive excessively long distances. 15000 km annually is the average.
    The parts of norway where very long driving distances are common (Northern Norway) BEV penetration is very low.
    Winter range of BEVs can drop a bit on the coldest days but norway is mostly temperate. Subzero temperatures usually only occur 30-60 days pr. year in most populated areaes. (Though it varies greatly, but so does BEV adoption)

    Note that the high numbers of EV sales in march is significantly due to that Tesla delivered ~5000 cars in. Tesla tends to deliver cars towards the end of the quarter, and Q1 saw the first availability of model 3 which had a large pent up demand, so do not expect next month to repeat this number.

    1. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, government using tax law to change behaviour works.

    2. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      Large EV sales in norway are due to subsidies to the tune of the equivalent of USD~10-30000 pr. car:

      * Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000) * Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars. * There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured) * Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)

      For usability: Most roads are limited to 80km/h and most drivers do not drive excessively long distances. 15000 km annually is the average. The parts of norway where very long driving distances are common (Northern Norway) BEV penetration is very low. Winter range of BEVs can drop a bit on the coldest days but norway is mostly temperate. Subzero temperatures usually only occur 30-60 days pr. year in most populated areaes. (Though it varies greatly, but so does BEV adoption)

      Note that the high numbers of EV sales in march is significantly due to that Tesla delivered ~5000 cars in. Tesla tends to deliver cars towards the end of the quarter, and Q1 saw the first availability of model 3 which had a large pent up demand, so do not expect next month to repeat this number.

      The Norwegian BEV exertion on road tolls has been ended and even with when a sales tax is levied on on BEV's you still no longer have to pay the carbon taxes you are saddled with when buying a fossil fuel powered car. I don't think that internal combustion powered cars will make a resurgence once the incentives are dropped. Only the current US government is betting its bottom dollar that the future of the car industry is to be found in 19th century vintage internal combustion engine technology.

    3. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by svirre · · Score: 1

      The BEV exemption on toll roads have not effectively been ended yet. Over the next few years it will however be reduced to a 50% discount. The schedule varies by region as there will be individual decision pr. toll road. F.ex in Oslo the discount will be changed from 100% to 75% in june. Most toll roads still have 100% discount, but yes it will change.

    4. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by svirre · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, but unless your country starts out with high car taxes it will be very hard for others to replicate these results. It is much more popular to give a tax exemption than to give a tax hike. The reason Norway got here is that we have historically had very very high car taxes, then essentially dropped them all for BEVs.

      A history note: The reason that was done was to support Think! a now defunct norwegian BEV startup from a time when there were much less EVs than today.

    5. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      * Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000)
      * Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars.
      * There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured)
      * Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)

      So the bulk isn't actually a subsidy, it's them not collecting taxes. And the emissions taxes are directly to offset the externalized costs of running a fossil car, so actually just a part of the TCO that some countries allow you to pass on to other people.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by svirre · · Score: 1

      So the bulk isn't actually a subsidy, it's them not collecting taxes. And the emissions taxes are directly to offset the externalized costs of running a fossil car, so actually just a part of the TCO that some countries allow you to pass on to other people.

      Tax exemptions are subsidies in my book. If you want to use different words, that's up to you.

      There are carbon taxes on fuel that I did not include in the above list, but avoiding those are certanly an added benefit to BEV buyers. (1l of gasoline costs ~USD 1.5-2 in norway. 80% of that is taxes) . In the larger scheme of things fuel costs are likely among the lesser benefit the BEVs get here. For an average driver this benefit amounts to ~USD 1-2000 annually. Most drivers spend more on tolls than on fuel.

    7. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, but unless your country starts out with high car taxes it will be very hard for others to replicate these results. It is much more popular to give a tax exemption than to give a tax hike. The reason Norway got here is that we have historically had very very high car taxes, then essentially dropped them all for BEVs.

      A history note: The reason that was done was to support Think! a now defunct norwegian BEV startup from a time when there were much less EVs than today.

      A country does not need to start with high taxes. It can start incrementally with an announced plan and road map to get from point A (low taxes) to B (high taxes) for the purpose of getting to C (moar electro-rides, less dino juice!11, or whatever the goal might be.)

      From there, peoples and governments will have the political will to get that shit done... or not.

    8. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by svirre · · Score: 1

      Sure, we just happen to have a 60 year head start on raising taxes on cars ;-)

    9. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Though parts of the US are pretty high too.

      Here between Federal/Colorado/Xcel energy you can get something like a $15,500 tax-credit/rebate on a new electric car. That amounts to being half-off a new leaf or bolt. Personally i think it'd be ridiculous to overlook that, but i don't think EVs are anything like 50% of the market here.

    10. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The current occupant of the whitehouse believes that the best technology is that invented over 100 years ago. It doesn't matter to him that technology has moved on and that BEV's are better than petrol vehicles in almost every way.

      The funny thing is, that if the US government pushed BEV's a little harder the US could dominate the world wide automative industry. But because of the current Whitehouse occupant the US is likely to give the BEV and future car market entirely to China.

      The Job losses will be phenomenal when China takes over the automotive market due to this shortsided attempt to prop up the fossil fuel industry.

    11. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...Norway sounds like the tax me state (NY).

      Tax for this...tax for that....

    12. Re:Norway is a bit of a special case here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla tends to deliver cars towards the end of the quarter, and Q1 saw the first availability of model 3 which had a large pent up demand, so do not expect next month to repeat this number.

      ohboyherewego.jpg

  14. They make a few kinds of sense though: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gasoline lasts a whole lot more miles per 100kg of fuel, than 100kg of batteries do. Driver further, get around corners better, break faster.
    And you can "recharge" in seconds.
    And your tank does not get smaller every time you use it.
    And gasoline has no lithium in it. Plus you can actually put the fires out that it causes. :)

    Charging batteries is not a free action either, but very inefficient. As OP said, turning electricity and CO2 into gasoline might well be more efficient.

    1. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You have to look at real-world driving patterns at one point, not on some fictional scenarios you apparently imagine happening every single day. Also, the energy return of hydrocarbon synthesis is less than half of the one of charging batteries, so there's that. Plus there's also the advantages of widespread V1G/V2G deployment from the grid's perspective.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by Sique · · Score: 1

      Gasoline lasts a whole lot more miles per 100kg of fuel, than 100kg of batteries do.

      Which only makes sense if you want to ride more than 2000 km without stopping. For all other uses, this is totally irrelevant.

      Driver further, get around corners better, break faster.

      The last two are purely a design problem, if they actually exist. And most people will never be able to tell the difference.

      And you can "recharge" in seconds.

      This is only relevant if you are recharging while on a trip. But a normal car sits in a parking lot 22 to 23 hrs a day, time enough for recharging.

      And your tank does not get smaller every time you use it.

      But the efficiency of your energy conversoin gets worse every time you use it.

      And gasoline has no lithium in it. Plus you can actually put the fires out that it causes. :)

      This is only relevant for today's battery technology. If for instance, sulfur-air-batteries are available for normal use, you don't need to mine Lithium anymore.

      Charging batteries is not a free action either, but very inefficient. As OP said, turning electricity and CO2 into gasoline might well be more efficient.

      Actually, it's worse, you lose about 50% energy to the environment compared with 10% for recharging.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re: They make a few kinds of sense though: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bevis actually corner better, because the battery sits near the ground, giving a low center of gravity.
      And having an engine with ONE moving part (not counting bearing details) does wonders for reliability. The entire drivetrain is typically eight gears, including the diff.

    4. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      get around corners better, Erm, no? Why would they?
      break faster. Erm, no? Why would they?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Driver further, get around corners better, break faster.

      WRONG! The only part of that, that is true (for now) is the Drive further!

      Electric cars handle better than ICE. They accelerate faster, CORNER FASTER, can tow more and how they break is entirely dependent car-by-car and often depends on the type of breaks used and the weight of the car. Some electric vehicles are heavier- but electric vehicles also can capture energy from breaking whereas ICE lose the breaking energy as heat.

      Electric cars are superior to ICE for everything except for range on a given charge.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      Which only makes sense if you want to ride more than 2000 km without stopping. For all other uses, this is totally irrelevant.

      That would be the case if you could return the car for a refund if you suddenly discovered that you need to do a long trip, but once you buy a car you are stuck with it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      How do you figure corner faster? The weight of the battery pulls them off the track.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by Sique · · Score: 1

      I have no problem to rent a car if I need something else for a single trip. I also rent a van if I have to transport more than my car can carry.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    9. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah I have a big problem with renting. I specifically purchased a vehicle that I could drive places and not rent. Don't like all the "conditions" they make for you, and I feel way more comfortable in my own vehicle.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    10. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      So first you spend more on an electric car, and then you get to rent vehicles you need for "normal" tasks like a road trip, going camping, weekend trip, visiting family for the holidays, going to the nice movie theater almost two hours away, etc etc. First they need large pickup and SUV EVs, which we don't have. Then they need a refueling stop that is close to as fast as ICE use. Then they'll need a better/cheaper battery replacement. Even then, you aren't saving much money, and it's been proven it's better for the environment to buy a used car then a new one.

    11. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Weight. EVs weigh more than ICE cars. We've also seen that Tesla's can't even make it around the race track without issues like overheating.

    12. Re:They make a few kinds of sense though: by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the Teslas that can't even make it around the track.

  15. An American Car Company is Winning. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Beating the pants off the Germans and the Japanese. So how do we reward it?

    Even /. that is tolerant of pot and porn is hostile and call the CEO a pot smoking fraud. Well orchestrated campaign is on to oust the star CEO to hobble its ability to raise capital.

    Structure the tax break to punish the ones that take early lead and risk. Tax break for Tesla and GM EVs are being phased out while the imports enjoy full benefit.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      The well orchestrated campaign stretching back for 11 years now. From day 1. If you have negative opinion of Tesla, check to see how your trusted news sources have been misleading you for a decade.

      Success of Tesla threatens the stealership network (6% margin on 300 billion sales) , the gasoline car makers (300 billion annual sales in USA alone), the oil industry (450 billion/pa in USA alone). Tesla does not advertise so media makes it the whipping boy to burnish their fearless journalistic credentials.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Citation provided: https://cleantechnica.com/2019...

      Look at the documented predictions of death of Tesla stretching back 11 years.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      Beating the pants off the Germans and the Japanese. So how do we reward it?

      Even /. that is tolerant of pot and porn is hostile and call the CEO a pot smoking fraud. Well orchestrated campaign is on to oust the star CEO to hobble its ability to raise capital.

      Structure the tax break to punish the ones that take early lead and risk. Tax break for Tesla and GM EVs are being phased out while the imports enjoy full benefit.

      Well, Tesla is a left-wing libtart tree-hugger company. Good right thinking christian conservatives can't tolerate that now can they? So, they go for the only other alternative which is try to kill Tesla by any means possible and then equating the use of coal/oil/gas and producing massive CO2 emissions with patriotism. They send people to energy industry conventions to promote coal fed power plants and get laughed at.

    4. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is not doing well and is not important at all when compared to actual mass electric car markets like China. It is half the entire EV market and there Tesla is a low selling brand with only 2% share far below Chinese brands and only really comparable to Volkswagen. They are a minor player in niche countries for the EV market. BYD and SAIC are much more important.

    5. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://cleantechnica.com/2018... "2% market share belongs to BMW, the best-selling foreign brand, and 2% to Tesla. The remaining foreign manufacturers share the remaining 2%."

    6. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, Tesla already benefited from the tax break. It's structured to try to get as many players in the field as possible (because that competition should be good for consumers). First mover advantage is covered by Tesla's trademarks and patents.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In the USA the product sold has to still pay for its own costs under the free market.
      No gov intervention with a "car" to shape the buying of a new car. The cost of keeping an older car.
      The freedom to enjoy any car. At any price. Not what is set by a new tax.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Beating the pants off the Germans and the Japanese

      Not really. Tesla had a big month as they cleared a backlog due to delivery problems, but the Nissan Leaf is still the top seller.

    9. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If it did the oil industry would never have started. Don't pretend that any of the things you take for granted came entirely from the "free market".

    10. Re:An American Car Company is Winning. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Then the free would would have missed out on so many amazing and useful products and services.
      Oil provides so many products and services all over the world every day.
      Now one gov is using a tax to shape the spending of its citizens.
      What will the gov like to alter next? Housing? Banking? Employment? More tax again?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. EVs are just better cars (mostly) by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.

    People who say such things are people who do not own and/or have not driven EVs. Yes there are some infrastructure issues for long distance travel still to be ironed out but the solutions are in sight. Furthermore in the mean time if I really need to drive a long distance I still own a gas powered truck or I can easily rent a car for a very reasonable price for my rare trip longer than the 238 mile range of my EV. It's not like the gasoline infrastructure is going to disappear any time soon.

    I own an EV (Chevy Bolt) and honestly I don't see myself buying a non-EV or plug in hybrid ever again if I have a choice. I've owned a number of hatchbacks over the years including some hot hatches and the Bolt is just in a different league in most respects from similar cars. It's more far fuel efficient, smoother to drive, quieter, accelerates better at any speed than all but the most ridiculous of hot hatches, requires FAR less maintenance, eliminates gas station stops, is more fun to drive, and the list goes on. Even if you ignore the eco stuff altogether, it's just a better car in most ways than its ICE equivalents. The cold does impact its range some but not enough to really cause any serious problems except in the rarest of corner cases. Put some good snow tires on just like any other car and it's fine in the bad weather. In fact it's better in the snow than my previous hatchback (a VW Golf GL) by quite a lot.

    I'm anxiously awaiting companies to start releasing electrified pickups and EVs with at least 50-100 miles of electric range or preferably completely EV. I'm watching the Rivian and Tesla offerings closely and hoping they motivate Ford/GM/FCA to get seriously busy with EV versions of their trucks too.

    1. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have really "tested" an EV unless you have lived with it for a month in -30C weather.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have really "tested" an EV unless you have lived with it for a month in -30C weather.

      I would never go somewhere with -30C weather! Why would I subject myself to that?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I'm watching the Rivian and Tesla offerings closely and hoping they motivate Ford/GM/FCA to get seriously busy with EV versions of their trucks too.

      I like the Rivian from all I've seen. Tesla often seems to go for flair rather than function- like their gullwing doors. Rivian seems all practical. I'd love a Rivian, there again- they're projecting them to cost $70k... there is no way I would spend that much on a car. I'm amazed that the average new car price in the US is now $35k; I have a good job that pays well and I'd never pay anything like that much for a new car so $70K is totally beyond my willingness to spend.

      I'd rather spend the money on something else... although if I COULD get any car I wanted and money wasn't an issue- it'd be the Rivian Truck.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I was born there and I asked the same question.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have really "tested" an EV unless you have lived with it for a month in -30C weather.

      After all, Petrofueled vehicles don't have issues at those temperatures?

      We have this strange dynamic developing of anti--EV people who live in warm climates obsessing about how the things work in Alaska or Norway. I think they might be the same people who freak out when one Tesla caught fire, while petrofueled vehicles burn up every day.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by es330td · · Score: 0

      I'm anxiously awaiting companies to start releasing electrified pickups and EVs with at least 50-100 miles of electric range or preferably completely EV. I'm watching the Rivian and Tesla offerings closely and hoping they motivate Ford/GM/FCA to get seriously busy with EV versions of their trucks too.

      I believe the pickups of which you speak are the ones driven by people as transportation, not the ones that do actual work. The Diesel duallys that pull work trailers have a 48 gallon tank for Diesel fuel. Diesel has 1.5e8j/gallon so one tank of fuel is 7.2e9j. That is 2000kwh of energy or 23 P85 Tesla batteries. At only 1200 lbs per battery, that is ~25,000 lbs of batteries. Many people who own these trucks for work purposes add a tank in the truck bed that adds another 50 gallons. Now you are talking about 50,000 lbs worth of batteries. All this on a truck that only weighs 7000 lbs.

      As a transportation fuel (meaning a fuel that has to be carried) batteries suck from an energy per unit of mass standpoint. If scientists can double the energy per unit of mass twice they might be viable for doing actual work.

    7. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by es330td · · Score: 1

      I think they might be the same people who freak out when one Tesla caught fire, while petrofueled vehicles burn up every day.

      There are orders of magnitude more ICE cars substantially older than Teslas on the road (just this morning I saw two different cars on the road that are 50 years old.) Given the fact that the oldest possible Tesla S is seven years old and their small relative numbers, the even one catching on fire should be disturbing.

      While bad things happening to an older car are often attributable to wear, bad things happening to a fairly new car usually point to a design flaw.

    8. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      FYI, There's another car fire reported in the US roughly every three minutes.

      If you normalize the data by total miles driven to account for the difference in numbers on the road, it works out that a gasoline powered car is about ten times more likely to go up in flames.

      It's also worth noting that the vast majority of Tesla fires involved severe accidents that totaled the car as a whole. These are usually not counted in comparisons because any vehicle is at severe risk of fire when they're that badly damaged. of those that remain, we have two or three major road debris strikes (now mitigated by better undercarriage plating) and one incident where a fire started at a faulty wall receptacle. As far as I know there are only two or three incidents that have been confirmed to be due to an actual fault in the construction.

      Meanwhile, recalls prompted by fire risks routinely reach into the hundreds of thousands. You'd think that multi-billion dollar manufacturers, who have been making cars for decades, using technology that's been around for over a century, would manage to get it right.
      =Smidge=

    9. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      what were the results of your tests in those conditions?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    10. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Given the fact that the oldest possible Tesla S is seven years old and their small relative numbers, the even one catching on fire should be disturbing. " - why? ICE cars have been catching fire since their creation and they still do after 100+ years of development. The odd car catching fire is nothing special for EV or ICE, shit happens.

      "While bad things happening to an older car are often attributable to wear, bad things happening to a fairly new car usually point to a design flaw" - some old cars were badly designed too and after 100 years development history design flaws there should be less and less. Cars now are so much safer than old cars.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    11. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about heating the cabin to a comfortable 23C and then trying to get anywhere long distance on the highway.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about heating the cabin to a comfortable 23C and then trying to get anywhere long distance on the highway.

      Sure. If you do a lot of long distance travelling, especially in cold climates, a good old gas powered vehicle with the required heating equipment is the trick.

      But for most of us, that isn't life with our automobiles. Most people go to work, come home, go to work, come home, do some shopping, etc. You don't need a vehicle equipped for a 500 mile journey, and even here in Pennsylvania, the temps aren't too bad. Even though this winter wasn't as warm as most lately, I don't think we ever went below 0 degrees (-18 C) this year.

      If an electric vehicle isn't for you, you shouldn't buy one. For a large number of us, they are great. Me? I'm a Jeep guy. So I'm not ready for an EV just yet. Soon I hope.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You can say that until there are no longer ICE vehicles on the market. Already companies are starting to abandon ICE for EV. They're not likely to care if they alter our way of life.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    14. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by es330td · · Score: 1

      My comment gets modded down with no explanation? How about the modder explain how my facts are wrong or write a counter explanation? I guess they think those Amazon boxes magically fall from the sky onto their porch and didn't require any actual work be done to get it there.

    15. Re:EVs are just better cars (mostly) by es330td · · Score: 1

      It's also worth noting that the vast majority of Tesla fires involved severe accidents that totaled the car as a whole.

      It would be informative to know the rate at which incidents that "total" an ICE vehicle also result in a fire. I know that what an insurance company considers a loss is not necessarily a complete loss. A severely damaged vehicle can be used for salvage parts; in fact, a friend's father once bought two "totalled" vehicles of the same model, one with front end damage and one with rear end damage and made one working car out of them. Once you light it on fire, parts become less useful as salvage.

  17. Well cut off my legs and call me shorty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ain't that something, my my my! What will they think of next! What a time to be alive!

  18. WindBourne quick tell us how the US is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know you want to lie about this, why even the hesitation?

  19. Re:Socialism is Easy by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    Socialism is Easy when you are an oil-rich country with a low population.

    Surely you are talking about the USA?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  20. All good until... by gabrieltss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The EV's are no longer EXEMPT from taxes. Gotta pay for all the infrastructure somehow. Eliminate gas vehicles and gas taxes and the money will HAVE to come from somewhere else... Just saying...

    Oh and ask the Norwegians what the battery life is in those vehicles with the harsh winters. I live in Wisconsin and our winters make batteries have short lives. I have to buy batteries for vehicles every 3 years. EV's are not a good solution for areas with harsh winter cold temperatures - period! People with their Toyota Prius's are using more gas in them as the batteries don't run as long in the harsh winters - I know 3 people with them. I went kind of in the middle and got a Smart car. The only problem with them is they don't do well on snow and ice covered roads. They are small and lightweight. But I get 50 MPG with it and an 8 gallon gas tank actually gives me a decent driving range.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:All good until... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Thanks for admitting what no one else will.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:All good until... by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Informative

      It may startle you to learn that the LiPo batteries in electric cars are not grandpa’s old lead acid batteries, not the Prius NiMh either, and that they have different properties.

    3. Re:All good until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Wisconsin, and have lived in North Dakota as well. My Prius battery got changed once 7 years ago. You must be doing something terribly wrong.
      And yes the mileage is worse in the winter, but that's because 35 mpg is worse than my summer 45-50.
      My worse still beats the crap out of most vehicle's best.

    4. Re:All good until... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Presumably you are talking about replacing lead acid batteries every three years.

      EV batteries are different. Warranty on most is around 8 years and 100k miles, some offering considerably more. So if it did die after three years you would get a free replacement.

      People have been driving around EVs for getting on a decade now in places like Norway, Scotland and northern Japan and the batteries have proven durable. Even something like the original Nissan Leaf which has minimal thermal management for the battery turns out to be fine.

      Modern EVs can both heat and cool the battery as required. For very cold climates they can pre-heat before you set off, ideally while plugged in so it doesn't cost you any range.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:All good until... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I just want to know how far a Model 3 will go with all the heat cranked up.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:All good until... by svirre · · Score: 1

      Oh and ask the Norwegians what the battery life is in those vehicles with the harsh winters. I live in Wisconsin and our winters make batteries have short lives.

      I haven't seen any data that shows reduced life (as in wear-out time, capacity does certainly get reduced) of BEV batteries in norwegian climate. I actually think this is more an issue in really hot climates, heat kills the cells, cold just reduces performance temporarily.

      We do tend to see 20-40% less range on BEVs in winter. However the most range degradation comes for short trips as a lot of energy is spent heating the car, so on longer trips where the range is more critical the degradation drops. Still BEVs that can reliably do more than 350km (220 miles) on a charge in winter are few and far between.

      Of course Norway isn't as cold as Wisconsin I think. Admittably I have only been there once (A cold experience at -40C, a temperature I never see here). but statistics seems to support that your winters are way colder than norwegian winters (At least on the cost where most people lives) , so your experiences may certanly differ from mine.

    7. Re:All good until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The change the battery every 3 years is more an indication of short trips than of winter. I have the exact same schedule in my 04 Honda Accord, and I've lived in Illinois/Wisconsin and Florida. The schedule hasn't changed to the point where I just have it on my calendar to stop by AutoZone and get a (often free) replacement before it dies. It has nothing to do with temperature.

      Btw, that Smart car was the dumbest vehicle you could buy. It's a death trap and has the worst reviews (look at Consumer Reports).

    8. Re:All good until... by andydread · · Score: 1

      you do realize that the batteries you replace in your vehicles every 3 years are lead-acid batteries and not Lithium-ion batteries right? right?

    9. Re:All good until... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      The EV's are no longer EXEMPT from taxes. Gotta pay for all the infrastructure somehow. Eliminate gas vehicles and gas taxes and the money will HAVE to come from somewhere else... Just saying...

      Oh and ask the Norwegians what the battery life is in those vehicles with the harsh winters. I live in Wisconsin and our winters make batteries have short lives. I have to buy batteries for vehicles every 3 years. EV's are not a good solution for areas with harsh winter cold temperatures - period! People with their Toyota Prius's are using more gas in them as the batteries don't run as long in the harsh winters - I know 3 people with them. I went kind of in the middle and got a Smart car. The only problem with them is they don't do well on snow and ice covered roads. They are small and lightweight. But I get 50 MPG with it and an 8 gallon gas tank actually gives me a decent driving range.

      Winters in Norway aren't as harsh as in many areas of North America. Just FYI. Weather and shit ain't just about latitudes and how close people live from Santa's toy factory.

    10. Re:All good until... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I live in Wisconsin and our winters make batteries have short lives. I have to buy batteries for vehicles every 3 years.

      You should buy an AGM battery next time, probably an Optima blue top given your conditions. It will last longer and work better. Or you could get a battery heater.

      Li-Ion batteries don't have a much shorter lifespan in cold conditions, they just don't offer as much charge capacity. And modern vehicles are heating them anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:All good until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, kind of like smart phones, which do not work in subzero (C) temperatures

    12. Re:All good until... by AK9oh7 · · Score: 1

      Not a Model 3, but my Bolt was getting 130 miles per charge. That's with the heat set to 76F while also running the seat and steering wheel heaters, on 5F days. Definitely not the 240 miles I get in the summer, but still adequate.

    13. Re:All good until... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah not enough to get me to the cabin and back with 10 friends.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  21. Re:Socialism is Easy by svirre · · Score: 1

    Norway is not a socialist country.

  22. Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - Norway is the size of California
    - Norway artifically makes ICE cars more expensive and subsidizes EVs with oil money yet people still have trouble finding chargers. They are non-existant in the mountains.
    - Norway never goes below -3C
    - All of Norway is 1619 km long. We have a completely ice road in Canada that is 750km by comparison.

    Norway is basically the perfect place for these cars.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Norway never goes below -3C

      Norway is basically the perfect place for these cars.

      Not sure where you found the norway never goes bellow -3C from. I can assure you that it gets way colder than that.

      Record is -50C and in the capital (Oslo) it is not that uncommon with -20C. I once biked to work in -27 for three weeks here in Oslo in 2012... That however was strange, but night to yesterday (Monday morning) we had -7C in Oslo

      There are regions in Norway that are more temperate, but you have to remember that Norway is mostly north of Canada ;)

    2. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Informative

      - Norway never goes below -3C
      If you would write:
      - Norway never goes below -30C it still would be wrong ... on what planet do yo live?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I have been corrected. Still on average temperatures are fairly high. Coldest average temp I found was -10C in bergen.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That 750km ice road is my daily commute uphill both ways!

    5. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Average temperature is completely irrelevant ...
      Norway has hot summers and cold winters.
      At the coast there are many towns, especially on the islands, that indeed are always above 0C ... because the golf stream hits there the coast.
      However Norway also has "mountains" ... so height comes into play, and it stretches up far north, like Alaska.
      If you had looked on a map, then you had no problem judging its temperature.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Norway reached -32 last year: https://www.thelocal.no/201802...

      If we look at somewhere like Troms we see that the AVERAGE minimum temperature is -8 in January: https://weather-and-climate.co...

      In fact Oslo, in the south, is due to hit -7 on Wednesday, and it's April: https://www.worldweatheronline...

      Check out Bjorn Nyland's videos on YouTube, he regularly travels through mountain regions in a variety of EVs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Others are saying that it rarely freezes where most people live.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by jmb_no · · Score: 2

      You don't need to go high up in the mountains even, you just need to go further away from the coast for the temperatures to drop quickly. Karasjok is, I believe, at an elevation of 141 meters, and it can be fairly cold there (record is -51.4C or close to that).

      Also: length. Closer to 2800 km of mostly windy roads crossing mountain passes and twisting around whatever terrain or moose was in the way when they built it if you go between Lindesnes and Kirkenes ;-)

      A lot of these factors caused people to be sceptical towards electrical cars, and many people still are. Reducing taxes on the cars is one way of coercing people into trying.

      For myself, I bought a plug in hybrid in 2014 (no tax benefits), and I just ordered a new one. 4WD electric or hybrids are really nice on slippery roads (especially for hills). We did consider a fully electric car, but the charging infrastructure in the northern parts of the country are still not quite there for a one car family (unless you can justify buying a Tesla ;-) ).

    9. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by svirre · · Score: 1

      I have been corrected. Still on average temperatures are fairly high. Coldest average temp I found was -10C in bergen.

      Bergen is one of the mildest climates in all of norway. I lived in Bergen for 10 years, it was hardly ever any show in winter. Oslo is colder but still reasonable. In the interior it can get a lot colder, but less people live there as well.

    10. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by svirre · · Score: 2

      Others are saying that it rarely freezes where most people live.

      That is not true. The most populous region in Norway is around Oslo. There are about 2M people living within commuting distance to Oslo. This region usually sees a few weeks each winter with temperatures around -10 to -20C throughout the day, with a more common winter temperature of -5 to 0C. Winter is roughly end of december to early/mid march.

    11. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by arcade · · Score: 4, Informative

      Norwegian Tesla owner here ..

      I was out driving in less than -20C here in Norway this winter, so that bit is patently false.

      There's plenty of chargers.

      Norway might be small area wise, but length wise (south to north) .. think San Diego to Vancouver.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    12. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to check your sources.. Earlier you said Oslo had an average low of 4c, while Bergen had -10c. Reality is that Bergen and rest western coast of Norway is the mildest area in this whole country, with cities like Bergen barely dipping below freezing except on some days. Oslo on the other hand it is quite normal to get around -20c during a cold winter day and so it is in most other cities not located on the west coast. In innland areas or northern norway, you can get well below -30c.

      I live personally in Trondheim and generally we get around -15-20c in coldest days with some areas gettiing several degrees lower, like valley areas and more innland. Plenty of people have EV's here including my sister and my sister has driven in conditions of around -20c quite a few times now with no problems other than some temporarely loss in range and slower charging times.

    13. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Norway might be small area wise, but length wise (south to north) .. think San Diego to Vancouver.

      But definitely very wise country.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    14. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by PPH · · Score: 1

      Ah well. We'll fix that with a bit of global warming.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    15. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It is still wrong, but how is that relevant anyway?

      Or "arguable" wrong. 1/3rd lives in Oslo ... which is rather warm. But still easily hits -10C every year and occasionally -30C or close to -40C (arctic vortex, you know? Can hit any place. Or typical winter high pressure zone over Siberia. It extends 5000km to the west and 5000km to the east. All of north Europe is below -10C reaching -30C easily, even south of Spain has -10C or Greece for that matter ... yes, been there when it happend)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bergen is quite far south, and on the coast. I don't know where you get -10C as an average temperature for there, as the average low temperature in Jan/Feb is 0C. If you want a low temperature in Norway, move inland: Oslo, despite being further south than Bergen has average lows of -5C in Jan/Feb, or move north: Tromso likewise has average lows of -5 in Jan/Feb, and Karasjok (both inland and far north, but with small population) has average lows of -22C in January (and highs of -11)

    17. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So you're saying of the 50% ov EVs in Norway, 50% are in those places. Not the places that only go to -3C.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      No place in Norway, or Scandinavia for that matter, has a region that never goes below -3C. The temperature varies greatly over the year, going as high as 35C (last year was a new record), and as low as -40C. There are places that are warmer in general (Oslo is decent), but will still have many days in the range -20C to -5C over the winter months, with maybe a few spikes (-30C) thrown in.

    19. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok but the people who are saying the temps rarely go below freezing, where do they live?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      I have no idea. Perhaps they are talking about averages or something like that?

    21. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Why is it when the conversation turns to EVs there are always different 'stories'. The internet says the average temp is -10 in Oslo. Where I live the average temp is -25, yet you are saying the whether there is like where I live.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    22. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I mean 'average LOW temp'. And yes I know whether is spelled weather.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    23. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok so I'm familiar with a city where the average low temp is -9.4C and I can tell you it is NOT cold here at all.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    24. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The average low temp in Oslo is -10.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I've gone back all winter in oslo and have not found one time below -11C.

      Why do you lie?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    26. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused here. The link you posted opens up January 2019, and already there I find a -14C listing for Jan 29. There's a -13C in February 2019, a -15C in February 2018, -18C in February 2011. That's from just a cursory glance, so there may be others.

    27. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But you said -40C!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    28. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Ahh, then I understand. I was talking about Norway/Scandinavia, not specifically Oslo there. Oslo has a few spikes here and there, and if you go through the temperature data you can find them, but the general temperatures for Oslo in winter will be in the range -5C to -20C. If you expand your search to all of Norway, you will however find places that go to -40C, same for Sweden and Finland.

    29. Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't most people with EVs be in the big cities? I guess a better question is, how many people with EVs in Karasjok versus everywhere else?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  23. *New* car sales by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Note that TFA conveniently ignores sales of fossil fueled cars that were purchased new in other parts of Europe and imported as used (cars represent a large share of Norway's imports). Electric cars are still a small percentage of the total number of vehicles.

  24. Yet 85% of Norway revenue stems from Black Sea oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the rest from pillage and plunder. How Trumpian!

  25. Cold climate people are screwed by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    People who live in cold climates are screwed. Eventually only EVs will be available and we'll have to pull gas heated battery trailers around I guess. There will be three ICEs on the market and they will all suck. I'm realizing there aren't really that many of us.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Cold climate people are screwed by dargaud · · Score: 3, Informative

      You think Norway is in the tropics ? For the harshest temperature, eventually they'll have insulated battery packs and internal heaters or some such.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:Cold climate people are screwed by PPH · · Score: 1

      I recall reading an article many years ago by a guy in Oslo. Who described his day driving around the city in nothing more than shirt sleeves. Going from one heated underground garage to another.

      If you live in a rural area where outdoor parking is the norm, you probably aren't the target market for an EV anyway.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Cold climate people are screwed by jlv · · Score: 1

      Eventually? Some EVs have that now.

    4. Re:Cold climate people are screwed by swillden · · Score: 1

      Eventually? Some EVs have that now.

      I don't think there's an EV on the market that doesn't have battery heaters. Even the first-gen Nissan Leaf, which mostly ignored battery thermal management, included battery heaters. Insulation, not so much.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Cold climate people are screwed by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's more about heating the interior of the car sufficiently and still driving a long way.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  26. WindBourne thinks only 2 years and zero ice cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then he is a bit thick...

  27. Better title by jlv · · Score: 1

    Better title: "Over 50% of the new vehicle sales in Norway were Tesla"

    Relevant chart by maker: https://teslamotorsclub.com/tm...
    Telsa 50.6%
    VW 9.4% ...

    1. Re:Better title by jlv · · Score: 1

      Wrong! 60% of new vehicle sales were EV; half of those were Tesla (for a total of 30% of the market).

  28. Yes, but it's Europe by hymie! · · Score: 2

    Just a reminder about the old joke, that in Europe, 100 miles is a long distance, and in America, 100 years is a long time.

    I have nothing bad to say about all-electric cars. But a 300-mile range will not even get to my parents' houses. That's why i can't buy one.

    1. Re:Yes, but it's Europe by jlv · · Score: 1

      I'm taking a 450 mile trip on Thursday with one of my Tesla's. I'll stop to charge twice for 20 minutes each. Their SuperCharger network makes it very easy in most of the US.

      That's why you *can* buy one.

      FWIW, you can't really make such a trip in any other EV for sale (yet -- it's getting better with the Electrify America network deployment by VW, but none of the non-Tesla cars for sale today can really take advantage of the faster charging speeds still).

  29. Meridian Energy TV ad: Let's take on Norway! by twosat · · Score: 1
  30. The evidence mounts by Socguy · · Score: 1

    It's fun to read the comments and watch the haters who have been convinced for years that EV's have no future continue to try and twist themselves in knots because reality refuses to conform to their delusions.

    1. Re:The evidence mounts by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Where can I buy a second hand EV in the UK with a folding hard top roof for under £30k and less than 15k miles on it, that'll let me take 300 mile journeys to Scotland without stopping?

      I mean, that's a large budget I'm offering there.

      Just that, unless you can meet those pretty reasonable expectations then reality isn't yet conforming to your delusions.

  31. -30C is routine where I live by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I don't think you have really "tested" an EV unless you have lived with it for a month in -30C weather.

    Perhaps not but where I live -30C (-22F) is a fairly routine occurrence and I drive an EV in such weather. I'm pretty sure the weather in Norway is at least as cold if not worse. It's certainly further north by a substantial distance.

  32. Rivian headlamps = ugly by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I'd rather spend the money on something else... although if I COULD get any car I wanted and money wasn't an issue- it'd be the Rivian Truck.

    Only style critique I have of the Rivian trucks is those headlights are UGLY. I have no idea why they thought that was a good look. Maybe they work great but they look like shit. Functionally it seems like a good truck presuming the build quality and interior functions are up to par.

  33. Let's see by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    The main page link to here is broken.

    Anyway, I would like to see a large-scale anysis of pollution -- The ability to have better scrubbers in power plants, or renewable energy plants better yet, than on cars.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Let's see by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Norway gets its electricity from hydro plants.

      I eagerly await your design for a pollution scrubber for a hydro plant.

    2. Re:Let's see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, it is described in detail after this sentence.

  34. Half how how many? 10? 100? 1000? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    Couldn't even find it in the actual document.

  35. Not when it's tax breaks for big oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then they're totes not subsidies. Otherwise there's 13 trillion dollars a year in subsidies for the fossil industry to balance against your content-free whine about how they're subsidising EVs...

    1. Re:Not when it's tax breaks for big oil by svirre · · Score: 1

      Whine? I am not complaining. I am quite in favor of subidizing EVs to accellerate their adoption.

  36. Lower CoG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it corners better. Higher torque and lack of gearing creating less stiction losses for the electric drivetrain helps too. Plus they have more torque to begin with, and cornering is no different to acceleration as far as energy use is concerned.

    1. Re:Lower CoG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://teknikensvarld.se/algtest/

      Actually the Teslas are good, but not earth-shattering. Active anti-roll bars help a lot in terms of agility. Believe me, I have a Xantia Activa, 21 years old now. I keep it because I've not found another car remotely as funny to drive on twisty roads (and with 4 or 5 people aboard plus luggage). The Citroën is for fun, I have other cars for daily commute and more mundane uses.

       

  37. Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done, Norway.

    Despite being a really small country, which makes that easier, nonetheless it is still a louvable initiative.

  38. ICE sales drop, EVs increase by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    It was nice to see Tesla as #1 EV there. In addition, even better is that ICE sales are dropping there, while EVs continue to rise. With the coming increase in models as well as production, norway, in fact, most of the western nations, will likely have 50+% of their new car sales be EVs by end of 2022/3. That is 4 years away. With EV prices continuing to drop and Super Chargers going in all over, 4 years will be all that is needed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. Didn't you claim in 2 years they would be no ICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    First off, new ICE cars will probably stop selling in about 2 more years.

    WindBourne.

    Yes, you did.

  40. only about 20 months left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    First off, new ICE cars will probably stop selling in about 2 more years.

    WindBourne

  41. USA is worse than both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans use much more oil and gas and a similar amount of coal as either China or India.
    You have little idea of the real world.

  42. Why lie, you're not a 3 Amigo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chas WindBourne and Lukyo are the 3 lying Amigo's. 4 just doesn't have the same ring to it sorry.

  43. The weather in Norway by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    If this thread proved one thing, it's that no one really knows what the weather in Norway is. I'm going to go out on a limb and say more people have EVs where the weather rarely gets cold than where it gets very cold.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  44. wow how ignorant are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA burns more oil and more gas than either China or India. Clean up your own mess before pointing your fingers at countries cleaner than you are.

  45. You made the wild claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to back it up?
    You already mentioned 'generally' and plastic. It's not looking like you'll be able to...