Slashdot Mirror


Disney+ Streaming Service To Launch In November, Priced At $6.99 Monthly (variety.com)

Disney has announced that its highly anticipated new streaming service, Disney+, will launch in the U.S. on November 12 with a price of $6.99 per month. Variety has more details: The subscription VOD service represents Disney's next major foray into the video-streaming wars. By pricing it well below Netflix, the Mouse House is betting it can rapidly drive up Disney+ customer base with a melange of content that appeals to multiple demographics, including movies and TV shows from its Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar and Disney brands.

At launch, Disney+ will include 7,500 episodes, including from 25 original series; 400 library movie titles; and 100 recent theatrical films releases, according to Agnes Chu, senior VP of content, Disney+. That includes exclusive rights to all 30 seasons of "The Simpsons," which Disney obtained through the acquisition of 21st Century Fox. In year five of Disney+, the company expects to have an annual production slate of some 50 originals, Chu said. Disney+ will be an ad-free service, supported solely by subscription fees. It's going to have a wide platform footprint, spanning game consoles, smart TVs and connected streaming devices, including Roku and PlayStation 4, said Michael Paull, president of Disney Streaming Services (formerly BAMTech).
"After Disney+'s initial North American launch in the fourth quarter of 2019, the service will roll out to Europe, Latin America and Asia as Disney's international rights return to the company from licensees," the report adds. Kevin Mayer, chairman of Disney's Direct-to-Customer and International business segment, also said that the company will "likely" offer a discounted bundle combining Disney+, ESPN+, and Hulu.

All of Disney+'s content will be available to download for offline viewing and will be available in 4K. Some of the content subscribers will have access to includes all of the Star Wars films, 250 hours of NatGeo content, and hundreds of episodes from Disney Channel shows as well as a brand-new "Phineas and Ferb" movie.

85 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. But will Song of the South be on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's all anyone cares about.

    1. Re:But will Song of the South be on it? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      How about The Simpsons S03E01 Stark Raving Dad?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:But will Song of the South be on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Beast kidnaps and brainwashes a girl into being his organ donor.

      Aurora is sexually assaulted while sleeping. Snow White is the concubine of a bunch of dwarf miners. Cinderella is forced into domestic servitude and spreads her legs to get out of it.

      There is no beauty in being a Disney princess.

      The only one who even takes an active role in her life is Eilonwy from the Black Cauldron.

  2. Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So all episodes will no longer be on FX or FXX?

    1. Re:Simpsons? by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      That's what I came to gripe about. It's bullshit.

  3. Will probably subscribe by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I wasn't going to do it, but if the Disney+ thing holds all the Star Wars content damn them if they didn't price it JUST low enough I will probably go for it after all.

    If they have an AppleTV app.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Will probably subscribe by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope, not even close. Disney, although is doesn't know it yet, has introduced the great streaming churn. People will swap streaming services upon a regular basis, as none of them will end up with sufficient content, ignoring all the filler crap no one watches, people will not pay for multiple services, they will simply swap on a quarterly or half yearly basis, depending upon how many they want to go with.

      Churning streaming services will become the norm and they will all go hungry trying to eat each others lunch. They will end up trying all sorts of manipulative corporate shit to lock people in to block churning.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Will probably subscribe by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      In Australia, "STAN" (Local Netflix clone with a lot of reality TV junk, but a pretty great movie selection), got the rights to the disney catalogue, and honestly, it kept me entertained for all of about 2 weeks aand then nothing. I've seen all the marvel and star wars films, multiple times. The only Marvel TV shows worth watching belong to Netflix and got murdered by corporate suits. And theres a few decent non-genre films. But beyond that, there just isn't enough content to make a streaming service out of.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Will probably subscribe by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      I already have copies at home of all three Star Wars movies, so I have no need for this subscription.

    4. Re:Will probably subscribe by war4peace · · Score: 2

      I recognize a bait when I see one, but I'll bite. I assume you refer to Episodes IV through VI?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:Will probably subscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, he means the good ones: the ones with Jar Jar Binks.

    6. Re:Will probably subscribe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disney knows it can rely on kids to keep parents subscribed for at least 10 years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Will probably subscribe by Hodr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People will swap streaming services upon a regular basis, as none of them will end up with sufficient content, ignoring all the filler crap no one watches, people will not pay for multiple services, they will simply swap on a quarterly or half yearly basis, depending upon how many they want to go with.

      You clearly underestimate both my laziness and my capacity to forget what I pay for things collectively.

    8. Re:Will probably subscribe by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I know some people that are so strapped for cash that they would probably jump from service to service. But most people I know would rather just let the subscription run than have to go through the hassle of stopping and starting services regularly. Personally I hate messing with that stuff, and every time I have to arrange billing online I'm thinking about what could go wrong and result in my CC information spread far and wide. So I buy stuff from Amazon even when it's not the cheapest. I think the last time I cancelled Netflix it was because we hadn't used it in almost six months. I'm pretty sure I'm still subscribed to a VPN service on an annual basis that I haven't used in a couple years. If Disney manages to keep the price down as well as Netflix has I expect my family will be subscribed for the next decade at the least.

    9. Re:Will probably subscribe by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

      Just wait. They will pull a Frontier and put some vague terms and conditions into the streaming "contract" agreement to put an early termination clause in there. A person wants to cancel six months later? Fine, they'll get a $1000 early termination fee. Go ahead, take them to court, spend all your lawyer money and your time fighting Disney on that.

    10. Re:Will probably subscribe by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Churning streaming services will become the norm

      I'm sick of it, and the fucking games these people do, I'm bored of it.

      So, I found a "pirate iptv provider", downloaded his app, and payed the bloke $10 dollars to get access to 1000 movies, 500 tv shows, and the rest.

      The point is ... you try to play nice, you try to pay, and they screw you up with either limited access to content (if you're outside of the US), or they play these stupid games were you have to subscribe to 4 content providers.

      I'm not marketing anything, or naming anything ... I'm just venting.

    11. Re:Will probably subscribe by westlake · · Score: 1

      Disney knows it can rely on kids to keep parents subscribed for at least 10 years.

      There is that. of course.

      But Disney has close on to 100 years of independent production to draw on, not counting Fox. Marvel, Pixar and so on ---- and mountains of cash to license productions from other sources. Disney may focus on family-oriented entertainment. But we are long way out from the studio as it was in the 50's and 60's.

  4. I think it may be for real by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    by Christmas $14.99 muhahahaah. Seriously, that seems like a well though out almost reasonable price.

    I had exactly the same thought, how much would it go up later...

    But Disney is being super smart here, because they know even though they have a lot of good stuff, they will always be a secondary subscription to something like Netflix. So they priced it just low enough that it's practical to have both.

    Now the real question is, if you want 4K content is that an extra fee on that base... I say yes.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I think it may be for real by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      By the time we have to subscribe to Disney, BBC, Netflix, HBO, Prime, and the sports package of your choice to get most of what we want to see... well, cutting the cord doesn't save much dinero over a Comcast monopoly area.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:I think it may be for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the time we have to subscribe to Disney, BBC, Netflix, HBO, Prime, and the sports package of your choice to get most of what we want to see... well, cutting the cord doesn't save much dinero over a Comcast monopoly area.

      But it's much easier to start and stop the various streaming services, unlike, say, getting locked into a 2 year contract with Comcast.

      If cost per month is a concern, and it is, remember that there's no need to subscribe to all of the services all year round.

    3. Re: I think it may be for real by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      must be nice to have the time to swap out streaming services every month

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:I think it may be for real by Hodr · · Score: 1

      Im just going to wait for Disney to buy all of the other studios. Then it will just be DisneyUNIVERSE, BBC, and maybe Netflix.

    5. Re: I think it may be for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      must be nice to have the time to swap out streaming services every month

      Once or twice a year taking 5 minutes to click "cancel" on a web page is too much time? Just make one or two less comments on Slashdot on the day you're cancelling streaming services and you've made the time up for that month.

    6. Re:I think it may be for real by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      "Subscription fatigue." Include subscriptions to NYT, WaPo, and others, and it's not a sustainable model.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re: I think it may be for real by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Just sounds like a pita to me.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:I think it may be for real by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      By the time we have to subscribe to Disney, BBC, Netflix, HBO, Prime, and the sports package of your choice to get most of what we want to see... well, cutting the cord doesn't save much dinero over a Comcast monopoly area.

      Yes, but you get to choose the content you want, not the cable company

      I just hope that works out better than our Choice for the candidate representative of the donkey or the elephant.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  5. Star Wars? by alaskana98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Some of the content subscribers will have access to includes all of the Star Wars films" - well this will definitely entice some folks.

    1. Re:Star Wars? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let's see...

      For $6.99 a month (or $69.99 a year)? Yeah, I'd do that...

    2. Re:Star Wars? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Shame they couldn't pick up the Netflix/Marvel shows though. Daredevil and Jessica Jones were great, Punisher and Luke Cage were good and even Iron Fist improved a lot in the second season.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Not All of Star Wars Yet by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It won't have the original trilogy yet. Turner holds the streaming rights until 2024.

    1. Re:Not All of Star Wars Yet by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then Disney must have licensed/bought the rights back, because they've confirmed that the original trilogy will be available on day one when Disney+ launches.

    2. Re:Not All of Star Wars Yet by alaskana98 · · Score: 1

      Ah - I was wondering about that.

    3. Re:Not All of Star Wars Yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will it be the original original trilogy, or the Laserdisc, or the re-master, or the Bluray re-master, or fan recreation of the 1977 original theatrical release, or some new re-hash?

      They could make it like Bandersnatch on Netflix where you get to pick if you want Han to shoot first.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Not All of Star Wars Yet by hawk · · Score: 2

      The ascii version, of course!

      For those who haven't seen it,

      telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl

      The very *definition* of "too much time on his hands" . . . :)

      hawk

  7. DoA by slashmydots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, I have enough subscription services right now and the whole point of cancelling cable was to stop paying tons of money per month so I'll pass, as will everyone else who's not rich or unbelievably irresponsible with their money. Dead on arrival.

    1. Re:DoA by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 1

      This is Disney we're talking about. They have an almost cult like following as strong as Apple's. No, not just kids. Grown ass men too, and not just because of star wars. So no, I disagree with your DoA assessment.

      At $6.99, I think it's priced great. I wasn't going to subscribe when they first announced this, but at that price, and all their back catalogue (Hello, ALL of The Simpsons!?), it'll be a great add if not just for my kids!

      --

      AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
  8. Re:$6.99 now and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Disney's about going to discover that bingeing is a thing. Expect the price to sky-rocket, and/or expect them to require you to pay for 6 months in advance, or agree to a 24 month contract.

    I'm planning to binge-watch the entire Disney catalog in one month for $7 once every 10-15 years.

  9. More live action than just Mandalorians by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are at least two live action Star Wars shows in the hopper...

    I agree, that is a lot of Star Wars (and Marvel) content for a not very large price.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:More live action than just Mandalorians by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Also Rian Johnson is signed up for another trilogy of movies after Episode IX.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  10. make Disney premium again and drop my bill $6/mo by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    make Disney premium again and drop my bill $6/mo and make it an choice.

  11. All Star Wars eventually? by Ded+Bob · · Score: 2

    Even everyone's favorite, the Star Wars Holiday Special?

    1. Re:All Star Wars eventually? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would live to see a movie that would humiliate Mark Hamill more than The Night The Lights Went Out In Georgia. But then I saw The Last Jedi.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. linear Disney channel is ad free and we all pay fo by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    linear Disney channel is ad free and we all pay for it.

  13. I'm just going to leave this little thing by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  14. Simpsons. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Forget Star Wars. The Simpsons alone will draw people in numbers.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. YAMSS by AxisOfPleasure · · Score: 2

    Yet another media streaming service, fragmenting the media market and forcing people on limited budgets to choose, or more often a lot of people simply picking one and then obtaining their other media through sometimes less than legal channels.

  16. Escaping the Orbit by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People will swap streaming services upon a regular basis, as none of them will end up with sufficient content

    I agree with this statement, for a lot of services. HBO is exactly that way for me, it has some shows I like, but not enough to keep me around for more than a few months at a time...

    Netflix I would argue, now has enough content existing and being developed that they can accelerate out of that orbit of churn, to full time streaming for most people.

    Disney though, might have enough here to e a full-time subscribe. As mentioned elsewhere, they will have a LOT of Star Wars content including new content (the auxiliary stuff like the TV series have been much better than the movies in recent years). Then you have all the Marvel stuff. And all the Pixar stuff. And all the Disney cartoons and movies... that's a lot of mostly pretty good stuff (well OK Disney TV probably has a lot of filler but still). If you have kids (which notoriously like to watch things repeatedly) it's an instant must-have service. Even without kids if you are into one of the vectors they offer deep enough (Marvel/Star Wars) it's worthwhile and there's probably enough new stuff ongoing you'll keep it for a year...

    As an aside, Amazon lucks into yearly video service users because so many people have prime. If they ever broke that charge for video out I think they'd see a huge decline in year long subscribers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. Re:Why PS4? by Linegod · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see that the average Anonymous Coward is a non-functional human.

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  18. Flexibility is key by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Exactly, for HBO for example I am in during Game of Thrones, but out the rest of the year. Even the Disney service, as cheap as it is if I find I'm not watching it, I'll drop for a few months or longer while they build up content... don't have the kind of flexibility with cable.

    Some seem to do just fine without Netflix as well...

    Even subscribing to Netflix and Disney I'll still be way better off from a cost standpoint than getting a cable package with any significant channels.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Possible illegal behavior by war4peace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA:

    After the initial North American launch in the fourth quarter of 2019, the service will roll out to Western Europe and in Asia-Pacific regions starting in Q4 and into early 2020 and in Eastern Europe and Latin America starting at the end of 2020.

    The European Commission will most likely slam them with a heavy fine if they do this. The European Union is a single entity economically speaking, and treating Western Europe and Eastern Europe separately is a huge no-no.

    Valve is under pressure right now for allowing game price geotagging in the EU, together with other major game publishers. https://win.gg/news/977
    As a person living in Eastern Europe (and a Star Wars fan), I am directly interested in how is this going to unfold.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Possible illegal behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Valve is under pressure for their regional price practice, and we dont know how that story will end yet.

      I am very sceptical that the EU would take action against Disney based on where and when they operate their business. It would be a frightening precedent as there are millions of companies in the EU that dont operate in the entire EU.

    2. Re:Possible illegal behavior by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Is the EU really trying to be that anti-business? Do mom and pops have to open stores throughout the EU if they open one up in, say, Germany? Are they required to be online retailers? The EU is kind of being a little stupid.

    3. Re:Possible illegal behavior by tepples · · Score: 1

      Do mom and pops have to open stores throughout the EU if they open one up in, say, Germany? Are they required to be online retailers?

      As I understand the single market regulation, the intent was that if a business chooses to operate online in the EU, then it must participate in the digital single market. Disney could instead choose to operate a Western European counterpart to Disney+ as a DVD by mail service instead of streaming.

      I still don't understand how the digital single market expects copyright owners to comply with obligations under decades-long exclusive territorial distribution contracts that predate the digital single market.

    4. Re:Possible illegal behavior by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Is the EU really trying to be that anti-business? Do mom and pops have to open stores throughout the EU if they open one up in, say, Germany? Are they required to be online retailers? The EU is kind of being a little stupid.

      I mean that's clearly not what they require, it's kindof mental to even ask. It's a price discrimination rule.

      "can't be charged a higher price when buying products or services in the EU just because of your nationality or country of residence."

      There is no requirement to operate over multiple countries, but if you do you have to offer the same prices to everybody, excluding delivery costs. Since delivery doesn't apply to streaming, then it's must just be the same price.

    5. Re:Possible illegal behavior by psavo · · Score: 1

      Don't be daft. All they have to do to dodge this is a) have a separate IP holding company (done) b) separate streaming license holder (done) and just not buy IP rights for the region until they're ready to open the shop.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  20. $6.99 FOR NOW by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First taste is cheap, people. Just like everyone else, they'll let you get all settled in, then start jacking up the price. 'Cord cutters', indeed.

    1. Re:$6.99 FOR NOW by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'd love to know what Disney and Netflix think about The Pirate Bay. How do they factor it into their pricing? Do they keep the monthly cost low enough to compete with it, or is it not a factor at all?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:$6.99 FOR NOW by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been on Slashdot since 1996 or 1997 and I have gone through my phase of using any number of p2p software pieces for obtaining whatever media I preferred to watch; however, these ended when I became an adult who could easily afford any of these services.

      What do I do now that Disney isn't on my preferred streaming services? I either choose to pay for it or I don't and my kids don't watch it. But, even though I did it in the past, I *never* once consider torrents as an option for consuming this and, if I think this way, the vast majority of people in the world do as well.

      So, to answer your question, no, they don't consider it as as a factor.

    3. Re:$6.99 FOR NOW by doubledown00 · · Score: 1

      I've been on Slashdot since 1996 or 1997 and I have gone through my phase of using any number of p2p software pieces for obtaining whatever media I preferred to watch; however, these ended when I became an adult who could easily afford any of these services.

      What do I do now that Disney isn't on my preferred streaming services? I either choose to pay for it or I don't and my kids don't watch it. But, even though I did it in the past, I *never* once consider torrents as an option for consuming this and, if I think this way, the vast majority of people in the world do as well.

      So, to answer your question, no, they don't consider it as as a factor.

      They should. I also used file sharing sites and stopped for the same reasons. Additionally for me it wasn't just economics, it was that they finally worked out how to deliver consistent quality timely content at a reasonable price that is easy to access.

      The problem now is with all these walled gardens, they are changing the deal. The hassle factor is going back up and content is becoming unavailable based on which subscriptions you do or don't have. I have already chosen not to have 10+ different subscriptions just to use the services a handful of times for a movie or two. I believe the result of this will be to push more people back to p2p.

      Although it won't happen in the current environment, the most consumer friendly streaming solution would be to create a compulsory license for movies and TV much like what radio has. All content is available to everyone for a set royalty rate per use.

    4. Re:$6.99 FOR NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been on Slashdot since 1996 or 1997 and I have gone through my phase of using any number of p2p software pieces for obtaining whatever media I preferred to watch; however, these ended when I became an adult who could easily afford any of these services.

      ive been here since ~1998, AC always; am too now an adult, and can now afford whatever media i want.

      that said, pirated PC video games are still the best to this day. no drm, no internet required, not tied to a service, sometimes better performance, you can make backups via disk/flash drive, etc.

      pirated music is still the best too (aside from ripping it yourself).

      still the pirate's life for me, ahoy.

  21. Re:make Disney premium again and drop my bill $6/m by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    It won't be available in my region anyway, and even if it was I doubt my smart TV or Kodi box will support it, so until they fix that it'll be the Pirate Bay for me.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. 6.99 loss leader. $9.99 once it's going by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    The $6.99 price probably won't even stand 12 months.

    Not even sure $9.99 will hold long. Their behavior in the past already shows they'd rather sell to 20% of the market at a much higher price.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:6.99 loss leader. $9.99 once it's going by Hodr · · Score: 1

      Where is your example of this? Disney used to be a paid premium channel on cable. Now there are several Disney channels in the basic cable package. That shows a willingness to accept less from each sub in order to get a greater total profit. Literally the opposite of squeezing every drop out of a smaller segment of the market.

    2. Re:6.99 loss leader. $9.99 once it's going by geek · · Score: 1

      $19.99

      Fixed that for you

    3. Re:6.99 loss leader. $9.99 once it's going by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Me neither. But for $6.99 I will probably sign up. I already have Amazon and Netflix - plus cable TV (because I have too to get Internet). So I need another streaming fee like I need a hole my head.

      For $7 - I will probably splurge for the kids. If it goes up much I'll have to seriously consider which one to keep and which to drop. Does "Disney Only" have enough content to win that contest? I don't know.

    4. Re:6.99 loss leader. $9.99 once it's going by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Look at their theme parks... for $60 you get a ticket.. for $200 you get to cut in line ahead of the people paying $60... and the way they treat their old movies. Repeatedly taking them out of circulation to artificially raise their value by creating artificial scarcity and then rereleasing them at higher prices.

      They'll probably have 2 tiers with 'really special content' being offered earlier to folks paying more.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  23. Re:Why PS4? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Because there are 100 million of them in the market....

    --
    Good-bye
  24. Re:$6.99 now and by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

    This is an underrated comment.
    Now that people can binge on series, they can only pay for say a month, watch the series by several episodes a day, and put their subscription on hold till something else comes about.

  25. Unless by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

    Unless this service contain all of Disney's movies/shows/properties this won't be worth it.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    1. Re:Unless by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.

  26. Hulu Bundle by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    The idea that Disney+ could be discounted bundled with Hulu is of interest. I couldn't care less about ESPN+, but do use Hulu regularly, particularly since I get HBO through it. I'm interested in some of the Star Wars stuff and hope some more mature TV shows might be spawned showing some grittiness of the galaxy (perhaps a show just about bounty hunters, or the Hutt crime cartels). Marvel TV shows have been more miss lately than hit for me (I liked Agents of Shield when it first came out, but the last two seasons have gotten weird and off-topic in my mind). I also hope all the old Disney afternoon cartoons are on the platform (like the old Ducktails, Rescue Rangers, etc).

  27. Re:"hundreds of episodes from Disney Channel shows by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

    500 movies and 25 shows.. is this a joke? That doesn't even cover their theatrical releases, let alone direct to video, FOX assets, etc.

  28. Machete order by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm more a fan of watching the Star Wars movies in Machete order (IV, V, II, III, VI). They show two of the episodes with "better CGI" as a flashback between episodes driven by practical effects, while not letting any movies spoil twists of other movies. Then The Phantom Menace (or The Phantom Edit if the "pet dog" annoys you) can serve as a prequel to the whole thing, a side story in the vein of The Clone Wars.

    1. Re:Machete order by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, it looks like I'm one of today's lucky 10,000 who never heard of The Phantom Edit until today.

  29. Another dagger in the economics of cord cutting by doubledown00 · · Score: 1

    Soon there will be even more content spaced out over an additional service offering. With the other major studios to follow with their own subscriptions (if they haven't done so already). To say nothing about the inevitable price increases, which we all *know* are coming. Youtube TV announced a $10 per month bump yesterday. Netflix is going up again. At a $6.99 price point The Mouse is already under the market average. How long are they expected to leave money on the table?

    I cut the cord last year and tried out three different tv alternative services along with subscriptions to Hulu, Netflix, etc. The thing that became clear very quickly is mere "browsing" for something to watch is time consuming. With the way content was fractured I found it next to impossible. I realize there are websites that allow users to search the streaming sites for specific content, but this is becoming a pain in the ass. Heaven forbid if you don't know exactly what you want to watch at that moment.

    We're back on cable now. For me most of the time the tv is background noise. I'll watch the local news at night. Maybe some American Football and some basketball. Content is fungible. The price differential is increasingly negligible ($72 vs $100 in this case).

  30. Re:Whadduuup by doubledown00 · · Score: 2

    Disney+ and chill?

    "Why don't you have a seat over there."

  31. In the future this will all be studied endlessly. by slappynipsy · · Score: 2

    If, instead of every studio baking it's own platform with it's own fees and structure they all banded together, removed their content from Netflix as a block and had a unified platform for steaming all content (Warner, Disney, Universal, Paramount, Sony) they would put Netflix out of business within a few years. After that break it back up and do whatever, what they are doing now seems to shortsighted.

  32. Christmas Special? by Kinthelt · · Score: 2

    If they don't have the Christmas Special, I'm out.

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  33. What about Gravity Falls? by urusan · · Score: 1

    Disney has been keeping Gravity Falls unreleased for years. Will it appear on this service?

  34. Re:$6.99 now and by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

    I'm going to make an uninformed guess that the majority of their consistent subs will be parents with younger children.

    Kids will ask to watch the same thing over and over and over again. And over. ...and over.

    So just because they watched a certain amount last month, doesn't mean they have less to watch this month.

  35. Re:linear Disney channel is ad free and we all pay by hawk · · Score: 1

    You mean the 24/7 infomercial for the Disney empire, which get's interrupted by 15-20 minute chunks of programming?

    hawk

  36. Miramax by damonlab · · Score: 1

    Too bad Disney sold the rights to Miramax. It would have been nice to have Miramax films included in this.

  37. Re:$6.99 now and by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't think that they'll start raising the price until they have a few more "Disney+ exclusive" shows that are only available on their new streaming platform.

    Then they'll start advertising the hell out of those shows on the Disney cable TV Channels, making sure that your kids will scream their heads off until they get an account.

    Worse yet, they might even offer a "free" trial over Christmas break to get your kids hooked on the new shows before the 2020 price increase.

  38. Download? by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

    All of Disney+'s content will be available to download for offline viewing and will be available in 4K.

    Err what? Can I just sub for a month, download everything they have and unsub? What container and codec is the download in?

  39. Re: In the future this will all be studied endless by slappynipsy · · Score: 1

    Movies anywhere isn't monthly service streaming platform, It's a way to view films you've purchased?