Slashdot Mirror


Jeff Bezos Confirms Amazon's Growth Is Slowing (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Jeff Bezos's latest shareholder letter, released on Thursday, opens with the first-ever disclosure of Amazon's total share of sales from the merchants that use the company's e-commerce sites as a sales conduit. The company has long said that those merchants sell about half of the individual items sold on Amazon, but it has never given their contribution to the total value of physical merchandise sold on the site. That number -- a common e-commerce metric known as gross merchandise volume -- has always been a secret at Amazon. Not anymore. Based on Bezos's letter and Amazon's previous disclosures, it's possible to roughly calculate Amazon's gross merchandise volume dating back to 2015. It's a remarkable number -- nearly $300 billion worth of goods sold on Amazon last year. Compare that with the $95 billion in total merchandise and ticket sales reported by eBay, the distant No. 2 player in U.S. e-commerce. (Walmart sells more than $500 billion in merchandise each year, and China's Alibaba sells more than $700 billion in goods.)

But there's a dark cloud in Amazon's figure. The growth of Amazon's total merchandise sales slowed considerably last year, according to Bloomberg Opinion calculations based on Bezos's disclosures. This figure is not the first sign than Amazon's retail juggernaut may have slipped a bit. In 2018, Amazon's nearly $300 billion in GMV was about a 19 percent jump from the prior year. That was notably slower than the rates of increase of 24 percent and 27 percent, respectively, in 2017 and 2016. It's hard to explain the slowdown in Amazon's merchandise sales growth. If anything, it seems as if Amazon is grabbing a larger share of e-commerce sales and that the internet is stealing more sales from physical stores, which have accounted for something like 90 percent of all U.S. retail sales. And yet Amazon's retail sales growth -- although still impressive -- is slowing noticeably.

111 comments

  1. Percentage growth by gtvr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Percentage growth will tend to slow as a company like this gets very large. I don't see the detailed numbers on the chart in the article, but it seems like total sales is still growing but a decent amount.

    1. Re: Percentage growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geez, three or more years ago, everyone thought the growth had its own growth. Wild and wacky stuff.

  2. Um by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course growth slows. How could it not? They grew fast and they are giant.

    What, do they need to take over 150% of ecommerce or something? Nothing can grow forever.

    1. Re: Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS

    2. Re:Um by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course growth slows. How could it not? They grew fast and they are giant.

      What, do they need to take over 150% of ecommerce or something? Nothing can grow forever.

      Because Wall Street needs (and assumes) companies to have constant and continuous growth to keep the financial markets afloat. All these valuations assume companies will keep growing at 10, 15, 20% and, if they miss a target by even 1% (oh no, a company only made $990 million profit instead of $1 billion, the horror!) they all scream the company is failing and the stock price tanks. This in turn screws over other people and promotes inefficiencies as companies focus more on meeting Wall Street's expectations, cutting workforces and using other tactics to bump earnings just enough to meet some arbitrary target, focusing on short term "growth" over the long term health of the company.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Um by Quakeulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell.

    4. Re:Um by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      This in turn screws over other people and promotes inefficiencies as companies focus more on meeting Wall Street's expectations, cutting workforces and using other tactics to bump earnings just enough to meet some arbitrary target, focusing on short term "growth" over the long term health of the company.

      This BS is what brought Enron down. The execs worrying about the share price and not focusing on things they do well. In order to keep the Street happy, someone will get desperate and start cooking the books more and more over time in order to keep the stock price going up. Finally it will all explode in their face once the truth is found out. Amazon will go down this same road if they are not careful..

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    5. Re: Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for always growing. It was nothing but books so long ago. Compare that to borders.

    6. Re:Um by geek · · Score: 1

      Economics 101, if you aren't growing you are dying. What the problem is these days, and probably has been for a couple of decades or more, is the expected rate of growth. The bullshit from wall street needs to end.

    7. Re:Um by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Economics 101, if you aren't growing you are dying

      It is because of absurd statements like this that I do not take seriously economists. The financial world can live in a fantasy bubble but hard reality and cold logic show that it is impossible to grow forever.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    8. Re:Um by vlad30 · · Score: 2

      Some time ago Company valuations were much more simple and realistic 8 times net or 2 years turnover add something for goodwill. Then someone threw that out and started valuing on hype. When this happens there will be a correction when reality and unsustainable growth and unrealistic valuations are finally acknowledged.

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    9. Re:Um by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Economics 101, if you aren't growing you are dying. What the problem is these days, and probably has been for a couple of decades or more, is the expected rate of growth. The bullshit from wall street needs to end.

      Sales dollars should grow, yes. But as long as they are growing in step with inflation and your own costs (so that your actual net revenue stays at least the same) you are perfectly fine. Massive growth is unsustainable long term. Inflation is currently at about 2%. Even a 4-5% growth rate is healthy at this point for a large, established company-Amazon was still at 19%.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    10. Re: Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and eventually they will jack up prices to take advantage of their monopoly.

      I already avoid Amazon as much as possible. A lot of the time they are selling dollar store quality goods at high prices or selling name brand items around the same price too.

      I have also note that there are a lot of retailers selling items at extremely high prices. It makes no sense to me why they do that unless they hope people accidentally purchase it. If my assumption is true, Amazon should be charging these retailers a listing fee for being idiots

    11. Re:Um by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      One thing that's made Amazon so successful is that Bezos seems to have the spine to ignore that sort of short-sighted "advice", at least historically. I haven't seen any evidence that's changing.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    12. Re:Um by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they want to see growth constantly, because it's the only way a system can work that's based on huge amounts of debt. With the fallacy that if you grow fast enough, you can stop from sinking deeper in the hole.

      Somehow nobody really seemed to stop to take a look at natural systems, where everything must eventually find an equilibrium or suffer certain collapse.

    13. Re:Um by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Economics 101, if you aren't growing you are dying

      It is because of absurd statements like this that I do not take seriously economists.

      Like most statements of this nature, it is grossly misunderstood.

      An individual company is dying if it's not growing, because sooner or later someone with greater economies of scale will show up to eat its lunch.

      The total market doesn't have to grow for individual companies to grow. Others only have to fail.

      With that said, we could have endless growth if only we had kept the space program going after winning the space race, instead of stopping when the USSR went bankrupt. Space is the only place where [effectively] endless growth is possible. Sadly, if climate change becomes severe enough, no species might ever make it off of this mudball. Can't reasonably reach the point of refining aluminum without going through an iron age, and can't have another iron age if all the trivially mined iron has rusted away to oxides.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Um by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This. I have a corollary for it:

      Shareholders want asymptotic growth over nanosecond time scales. ~ CaptainDork

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    15. Re:Um by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      When companies go IPO, the owners become followers. They fight shareholder greed and champion the long view.

      The adversarial relationship explain why some are billionaires and some are stockholders.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    16. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead on! The only thing in nature that grows continuously is cancer. Everything healthy reaches a balance with its environment. Perhaps some day companies will discover investing in their people and in the future as standard practice instead of anomalies. Then stock prices might re-assume a relationship to the actual health of the company and its markets -- instead of a measure of mob hysteria in the casino.

    17. Re:Um by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "Space is the only place where [effectively] endless growth is possible. "

      It's not though, assuming you mean exponential growth, which almost everyone does. People throw out the term "exponentially" without the slightest idea what it implies.

    18. Re:Um by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Space is the only place where [effectively] endless growth is possible."

      It's not though, assuming you mean exponential growth, which almost everyone does.

      For your convenience (and that of others) I have said what I meant.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Um by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Cool. In that case, effectively endless growth is possible pretty much anywhere. Space isn't special.

    20. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economists are right though, whether you like it or not. There's a reason the money people are filthy fucking rich. The people living in a fantasy bubble are the ones who think you can have a business that just does its thing forever. Economists understand that there is no steady state, and a company that stops growing is very likely about to start shrinking.

    21. Re:Um by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      You are lost into a "religious dogma" with no basis in reality. Reality does not care what you want the truth to be.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    22. Re:Um by geek · · Score: 1

      How does economic illiteracy like yours get modded up? Crazy

    23. Re: Um by orlanz · · Score: 1

      You picked a horrible example.

      Nature is a growth system. There is no long term stable equilibrium; the point is always shifting. The growers are considered winning and the rest are considered losing.

      Every subsystem grows till the point of maximum environment saturation. There is no plant, animal, or germ that stops short of its petri dish and is content.

    24. Re:Um by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Because it is the truth, whether you like it or not? Infinite growth is impossible and no economist can change it, no matter how much they shout and shout against it.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    25. Re:Um by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cool. In that case, effectively endless growth is possible pretty much anywhere. Space isn't special.

      Space is special because there's space there, and you can throw things away. On a planet, space is much more limited, and there is no "away".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re: Um by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      wrong, he took a good example. In nature if a species outgrows its food supply, members of the species will die until the balance between the population of the species and the food supply is reached.

      Economists make a ridiculous mistake in believing that their "food supply" would be infinite.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    27. Re:Um by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, when was the last time you had to get bigger shoes to account for growth? When's your funeral?

    28. Re:Um by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate Adam Smith?

    29. Re:Um by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      " Infinite growth is impossible"

      But that was not your original claim.

    30. Re:Um by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      "The financial world can live in a fantasy bubble but hard reality and cold logic show that it is impossible to grow forever."

      Found it now? I know that as English is not my native language so I can make grammar mistakes, but I'm fairly sure it's obvious enough what I meant.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    31. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the biggest number for which e^x is defined?

    32. Re: Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a fucking idiot. Jesus Christ.

    33. Re: Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb dumb dumb
      Dumb !!

    34. Re:Um by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Because Wall Street needs (and assumes) companies to have constant and continuous growth to keep the financial markets afloat.

      It seems like it's even worse than that. Constant growth isn't good enough, a company has to have accelerating growth.

    35. Re:Um by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Growth can continue indefinitely as long as the population is growing.. We'll add another 5 billion humans over the next 50 or 100 years, so, in theory, Amazon can continue to grow for at least another century.

      Mind you, I'm not suggesting that this would be good, just that it's possible.

    36. Re:Um by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      It is a core tenant of capitalism. Some growth is always desirable. If you don't grow and one customer leaves, you'll have less revenue.. If that happens too many times, you'll have to fire someone... As long as you are growing, jobs tend to be stable. Of course the best growth is sustainable growth and growth where you aren't compromising yourself.

      Since you want to use the biological analogy, no growth gives you dwarfism.. Not a desirable outcome either..

    37. Re:Um by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

      Equilibrium is the best state you can hope to reach.

  3. Killing the host by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder since it is killing it's host.

    1. Re:Killing the host by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "No wonder since it is killing it's host."

      you just wrote

      No wonder since it is killing it is host.

      think about it

  4. Growth is slowing? So what by MitchDev · · Score: 0

    Is Amazon still making a profit?

    Then shut up tax dodger

  5. No wonder... by SirTreveyan · · Score: 2

    Part of it is Amazon's forcing customers into Amazon Prime. I order items off of Amazon maybe 2 or 3 times a year. I do not order items off of Amazon often enough to justify paying a monthly fee for Prime. Yet the last time I ordered something from Amazon they automatically opened a Prime account for me. I do not want Prime, it is not worth it for me. I do not care if streaming TV or music is bundled with it...I do not want it; do not force it upon me. I had to cancel, which is a pain because they do not make it easy to find. Then once I found where I could cancel they asked me to confirm 2 or 3 times before they processed the cancellation request. Evidently they think their customers are stupid!!! Because of this I will not buy from them again.

    --

    SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0

    0 rows returned

    1. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You almost certainly neglected to uncheck the box offering a "free trial of Amazon Prime" when you placed your order. This one's on you.

    2. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably couldn't see the checkbox...it was hidden behind the half dozen browser toolbars he's accidentally installed over the years, along with countless copies of McAfee

    3. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he checked it - after seeing that doing so would give him free shipping on that particular order.

      captcha: patrons

    4. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      neglected to uncheck the box

      IMHO these kinds of traps are definitely on the company. They try to trick people into buying add-on services with patterns designed to slip by unnoticed. It's shady as fuck.

    5. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost certainly neglected to uncheck the box offering a "free trial of Amazon Prime" when you placed your order. This one's on you.

      If your wife finds you distracted and starts rambling from the other side of the house, slipping in "Say no right now or you give me permission to sleep with your brother." doesn't make her cheating your fault.

    6. Re:No wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I do not want Prime"

      Would you like it in a house?
      Would you like it with a mouse?

  6. I would assert it is retail as a whole by ctilsie242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it isn't obvious, we are starting to see signs of a recession coming our way. Amazon is a retailer, and just like any other, they are subject to how well-off people are doing financially. Come crappy times, retail sales are going to suffer.

    This isn't to say Amazon will go the way of Sears. AWS will ensure that they are not going anywhere, because businesses always outsource/offshore when a recession hits, even if it costs them more, so more businesses will be doing lift-and-shifts to the cloud in order to save on CapEx costs, even though their monthly burn rate will spike.

    Of course, if Amazon really starts hurting, they can always raise rates on AWS services, and with so many companies shackled to the cloud with no way to leave (good luck getting away from Lambda), they will pony up the higher rates, and pray the deal doesn't get altered further.

    1. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      If it isn't obvious, we are starting to see signs of a recession coming our way. Amazon is a retailer, and just like any other, they are subject to how well-off people are doing financially. Come crappy times, retail sales are going to suffer.

      This isn't to say Amazon will go the way of Sears. AWS will ensure that they are not going anywhere, because businesses always outsource/offshore when a recession hits, even if it costs them more, so more businesses will be doing lift-and-shifts to the cloud in order to save on CapEx costs, even though their monthly burn rate will spike.

      Of course, if Amazon really starts hurting, they can always raise rates on AWS services, and with so many companies shackled to the cloud with no way to leave (good luck getting away from Lambda), they will pony up the higher rates, and pray the deal doesn't get altered further.

      I would say that Amazon is more recession-proof than most retailers, because they (for the most part) don't have to deal with brick and mortar locations, just warehousing. They've outsourced a lot of their deliveries to suckers, er, "independent small business owners", and a lot of the little stuff can be handled by the Post Office which isn't going anywhere. There's always plenty of cheap Chinese knockoffs that people will buy to save a few bucks, and they become even more attractive during a recession. And, as you say, they have AWS to help keep them afloat.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by thereddaikon · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. Their growth has slowed because there isn't much more room to grow at this point. Outside of amazon the only internet retail that's doing well is either niche and outside of what Amazon offers (such as collectibles, guns, etc) or has a model that is incompatible with Amazon's (auction model).

      This is the same kind of gloom and doom bullshit you see spouted in those "the PC is dead" trash articles. Just because growth isn't massive, does not mean a company isn't healthy.

    3. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by tomhath · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There aren't any signs of a recession. My guess is that the slow growth is caused by three factors:

      1) Amazon is no longer the only game in town. Most retailers, especially Walmart, are competing better
      2) The market for e-commerce is finite, Amazon's growth will slow eventually
      3) A smaller but still relevant factor is the Washington Post. A lot of people really don't like the direction it took after Bezos bought it

    4. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There aren't any signs of a recession.

      Housing is becoming more and more unaffordable. More and more people have no job security (relying on "gig" jobs). The government is a partisan mess and is trying to put people who have no clue what they are doing (or even worse, know exactly what they are doing and why they are doing it) in charge of things that have a direct, negative impact on the country and economy. Healthcare and education is becoming more and more unaffordable, driving higher and higher debt. Fewer people are entering the middle class and at a later age than in previous generations. Plus recessions tend to happen every 5-10 years, so we are coming due anyway.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Housing costs are up in some markets due to the return to normal interest rates thanks to the thriving economy and very low unemployment rate.

      The gig economy is tiny, not a factor at all.

      I agree with you about government partisanship, it's always been a mess although it seems to have gotten worse over the last 25 years. But read up on some of the things that happened during the first 50 years of USA history - how about the Vice President shooting one of his political rivals?

      Of course there will be a recession at some point in the future, just no signs of one today.

    6. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by geek · · Score: 0

      If it isn't obvious, we are starting to see signs of a recession coming our way.

      Such as? Its the best jobs market in 50+ years. The only people bitching about recession are in Silly-Con Valley because all their vaporware is being exposed as bullshit. No self driving cars, no AI, Machine Learning is turning out to be nothing more than really complex and shitty pattern matching. They are nothing but advertisers selling people to other advertisers.

      The rest of the economy is fucking stellar and couldn't give a shit less about Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple.

    7. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon does more retail sales than all other competitors combined. You can only expand so far before there isn't any competition to eat up.

    8. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by geek · · Score: 0

      Housing is becoming more and more unaffordable. More and more people have no job security (relying on "gig" jobs).

      Maybe where you live. The rest of the country is experiencing the best jobs market in half a century and new housing projects all over the place. Move out of your shitty echo chamber of a community and see how great things really are.

    9. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Housing costs are up in some markets due to the return to normal interest rates thanks to the thriving economy and very low unemployment rate.

      The problem isn't that so much as they aren't builing entry-level housing anymore. Where I live(where I bought my home 4 years ago for less than $200k) the cheapest a new build is going for now is $350k for a townhome. And I am on the outer edge of a major metro area, a good 30-40 minutes outside the city limits.
       

      But read up on some of the things that happened during the first 50 years of USA history - how about the Vice President shooting one of his political rivals?

      History degree holder here (I know, queue the usual Slashdot derision for liberal arts majors-to make it worse I even have a polisci graduate degree!). I'd much rather go back to how we used to do it. No tickets-winner became President, second place became VP. Oh, and everyone in Congress still had to actually work for a living, legislating was just their side gig.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    10. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Housing is becoming more and more unaffordable. More and more people have no job security (relying on "gig" jobs).

      Maybe where you live. The rest of the country is experiencing the best jobs market in half a century and new housing projects all over the place. Move out of your shitty echo chamber of a community and see how great things really are.

      My wife and I both have good jobs and live in a nice, affordable house. Any new construction around us now starts at 350k, existing houses (comparable to ours) sell for about 230k+. At 32, I'm lucky to only have about 25k in student loans to pay off. Back in 2015 my town was ranked as the #50 best place to live nationally, so it's not a crappy shithole. If my wife and I were a few years younger, all we'd be able to afford right now is an apartment, probably paying in rent about what we pay in mortgage.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    11. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by DarenN · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the slowdown in growth will almost certainly reflect in a slowdown in share-price growth (which is normal). So Amazon will have to consider paying a divided which they currently don't.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    12. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Housing costs are up in some markets due to the return to normal interest rates thanks to the thriving economy and very low unemployment rate.

      Inflation means bad things for wage earners, because the minimum wage hasn't kept up with inflation in decades, and because all wages are related to the minimum wage.

      The unemployment rate is low because it doesn't account for people who are underemployed, that is, they are working one or more jobs and still can't pay all their bills, so they are simply going further and further into debt in order to survive. It also doesn't account for people who have given up looking for full-time employment, or people who have been unemployed long enough that they no longer quality for unemployment insurance. You are looking at the U-3 rate; you should be looking at the U-6 rate. It accounts for more of these people. Even it is a lie, real unemployment is much higher, but at least it is in the ballpark.

      Of course there will be a recession at some point in the future, just no signs of one today.

      Many economists disagree. There absolutely are signs of one today. Whether that means there will be one this year or next is another question, but there are indisputably common signs of a recession occurring right now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by nwf · · Score: 1

      I suspect that's partly the problem. From personal experience, I buy less stuff from Amazon that I otherwise would for several reasons:

      1. Their prices have been going up. They are often no longer competitive for many items. Movies uses to always be discounted, and now they like to try to charge full price sometimes. Same for toys. Marketplace sellers are often prices HIGHER than Amazon's prices or are selling a used movie for $1 less than Amazon. Why bother.

      2. It's almost impossible to find non-crap products in many categories. Lots of Chinese garbage, counterfeit products or they just just don't have what I want. Plus lots of sellers aren't authorized resellers for items, so no warranty. Try searching for furniture or batteries.

      3. Their search is increasingly showing what they want you to buy, not what I actually want to buy. Other sites let me drill down to what I want faster, even if they do cost more, I don't want to spend hours finding a product.

      The net result is that I've been using eBay and BH Photo more and more. To my office, BH Photo typically delivers next day for free. That's better than Amazon's two day and prices are almost always the same. eBay can certainly be sketchy, but prices are typically lower and they have more items.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    14. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty dumb to burden yourself with a lifetime of debt.

    15. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      I would add that Amazon hasn't really dealt with fakes. For anything moderately expensive I stay away from Amazon due to fakes. People in my circle have even gotten fake dog toys. Any health or beauty type products are almost certainly fake and the only way one finds out is when you buy the same product in a retail store and notice that it looks a bit different.

    16. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But read up on some of the things that happened during the first 50 years of USA history - how about the Vice President shooting one of his political rivals?

      In 21st century, vice president shoots best friend!

    17. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Amazon does more retail sales than all other competitors combined

      E-commerce retail perhaps, but Walmart's total retail sales are almost double Amazon's total.

    18. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to this, food has doubled in price in the last 15 years, and now cars are becoming incredibly unaffordable, both to purchase and to maintain. I've been in a personal recession for the last 10 years.

    19. Re:I would assert it is retail as a whole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're paying roughly $500 towards your student loans and 2k for the house+insurance+taxes. That's $576 a week. Lets add in 60 per utility: electric, gas, water, internet. Weekly: 100 for food, 50 for vehicle costs. Monthly total is around 3040. Times 12, divide by .7 for 30% taxes which gets you to 52k. So you need a 52k salary to survive with what you have. Average is around 44k. With two of you working you'd be around 80k which means you should have money for savings, kids, future repairs, and future medical issues.

      Total rent is always more than a mortgage. It needs to include the mortgage, insurance, taxes, repairs, vacancy, tenant management, and landlord profit. Rentals are a business, not a charity.

      I used estimates based on my costs. I'm single but with 50k in student loans. My house is 270k but it's a triplex with renters on the other floors. My income is 51k plus 25k from renters. I end up with enough in savings to make improvements to the property (resurface driveway, new furnace, etc...) a couple times a year. The out of pocket cost I spent to buy the house a couple years ago was 19k.

  7. Re:Growth is slowing? So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to dodge taxes and defund the government.

  8. Also in the letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The news I found more intersting from this letter was this part:
    "Today I challenge our top retail competitors (you know who you are!) to match our employee benefits and our $15 minimum wage. Do it! "

    Of course he's going to call for his competitors to do the same. AMZN just raised their expenses, giving competitors an advantage. By calling for them to do the same, he calls for them to raise their own expenses.... it brings the playing field back to where it was, removing any advantage that may have come from the difference. Not so altruistic as Bezos would like it to sound!

    1. Re: Also in the letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, paying workers enough to live without government aid is somehow a disadvantage? You leeches paying less are going to die off the hard way once ripped away from the government tit funding.

    2. Re: Also in the letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this... lets double the taxes Apple and Amazon paid to the US government.

      Oh wait... they paid $0?

      Nevermind.

    3. Re:Also in the letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The news I found more intersting from this letter was this part:
      "Today I challenge our top retail competitors (you know who you are!) to match our employee benefits and our $15 minimum wage. Do it! "

      Of course he's going to call for his competitors to do the same. AMZN just raised their expenses, giving competitors an advantage. By calling for them to do the same, he calls for them to raise their own expenses.... it brings the playing field back to where it was, removing any advantage that may have come from the difference. Not so altruistic as Bezos would like it to sound!

      Really what he is doing there is calling on consumers and the media to put pressure on his competitors to match the wage and benefits.

  9. quality merchandise problems catching up with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have deliberately not purchased some stuff from Amazon in the last year because I've been burned with previous sales in getting defective/bad quality merchandise. Easier to go to a local store where I can actually see and examine the item I want before I pay for it. Amazon has a quality problem in my eyes. Perhaps I am not alone.

  10. Expected return on investment by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Because Wall Street needs (and assumes) companies to have constant and continuous growth to keep the financial markets afloat.

    When people say "Wall Street" they are usually talking vague generalizations that rarely hold up to strong scrutiny. No different here. Wall Street isn't any sort of coherent entity. It's like saying "hipsters" and it doesn't really describe things in a way that is very useful except as a political punching bag. What really is happening is that investors expect a return on their investment for a given amount of risk. If an investor is seeking a 10% return on their investment in a company and that company gets so big (or does so badly) that a 10% ROI isn't realistic anymore, then the investor will take their money to some other company growing faster. You do it, I do it, and so does every other investor. It's not some vague Other called Wall Street. It's perfectly rational expectations by every sane investor on the planet. I'm not arguing that there isn't a fair bit of fraudulent nonsense surrounding all this (there is) but it's not entirely irrational.

    All these valuations assume companies will keep growing at 10, 15, 20% and, if they miss a target by even 1% (oh no, a company only made $990 million profit instead of $1 billion, the horror!) they all scream the company is failing and the stock price tanks.

    Stock prices in secondary markets are based on expectations of future returns. When the data reveals those expectations were incorrect then the stock price adjusts accordingly. For the most part this happens fairly rationally most of the time, despite all the sturm and drang you hear. If you expect a certain ROI for a given company then there is a price level for that. If the ROI turns out to be less then the price should be less too. It only becomes a problem when the company management starts thinking their job is the stock price instead of the products the company makes.

    1. Re:Expected return on investment by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When people say "Wall Street" they are usually talking vague generalizations that rarely hold up to strong scrutiny. No different here. Wall Street isn't any sort of coherent entity. It's like saying "hipsters" and it doesn't really describe things in a way that is very useful except as a political punching bag. What really is happening is that investors expect a return on their investment for a given amount of risk.

      "Investors" don't drive the market anymore. Investors are people who have been forced into relying on 401Ks for retirement since the eradication of pensions and gutting of Social Security surpluses. Most of the stock market is driven by the big investment houses who use computers, algorithms, and physical closeness to the trading floor to make hundreds our thousands of trades in the time it take an ordinary person to make 1 trade, leeching out money while providing no real benefit ("liquidity" is not a benefit if you are actually investing, only if you regularly have a large volume of turnover).

      Stock prices in secondary markets are based on expectations of future returns. When the data reveals those expectations were incorrect then the stock price adjusts accordingly. For the most part this happens fairly rationally most of the time, despite all the sturm and drang you hear. If you expect a certain ROI for a given company then there is a price level for that. If the ROI turns out to be less then the price should be less too. It only becomes a problem when the company management starts thinking their job is the stock price instead of the products the company makes.

      Correct, but my argument is that those expectations are never based on reality. The underlying assumption of growth is flawed. Just like a living organism, there is a point for every company where growth is no longer healthy for the company. If they keep growing they become bloated, get too inefficient, start buying up competitors or getting away from their core business, etc. Then, come a recession, market shift, or a new innovative competitor, they cannot react and start losing money, have to start spinning off or sell off products or divisions, massive layoffs, etc. If a company instead stabilizes growth once it hits a critical mass it can better weather recessions, still has the flexibilty to pivot with market shifts (if they can correctly identify the shift in time), and can focus on what makes it money and got it there in the first place, all while still generating healthy profits.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Expected return on investment by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      ... If they keep growing they become bloated, get too inefficient, start buying up competitors or getting away from their core business, etc. Then, come a recession, market shift, or a new innovative competitor, they cannot react and start losing money, have to start spinning off or sell off products or divisions, massive layoffs, etc. ...

      Precisely this.

      Mobil Oil Corporation, Fairfax, Va., ca. 1985: Mobil had so much fucking money they went into real estate, became self-insured and sold policies, bought Montgomery Ward, Container Corp., which made paperboard products.

      Mobil (and other oil companies) made a killing during the oil crunch of 1973 and shareholders screamed to "invest the cash!"

      When things got tighter in the mid 80s, Mobil did something that's predictable today:

      It went super nova and expelled all of its non-core businesses in an effort to collapse into a well-oiled machine. (Note what I did there.)

      So, these days, when I see Apple, for instance, sitting on 240 billion liquidity and buying crazy-ass assets that no one at Apple is qualified to work on, I'm waiting for the explosion.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Expected return on investment by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      ... If they keep growing they become bloated, get too inefficient, start buying up competitors or getting away from their core business, etc. Then, come a recession, market shift, or a new innovative competitor, they cannot react and start losing money, have to start spinning off or sell off products or divisions, massive layoffs, etc. ...

      Precisely this.

      Mobil Oil Corporation, Fairfax, Va., ca. 1985: Mobil had so much fucking money they went into real estate, became self-insured and sold policies, bought Montgomery Ward, Container Corp., which made paperboard products.

      Mobil (and other oil companies) made a killing during the oil crunch of 1973 and shareholders screamed to "invest the cash!"

      When things got tighter in the mid 80s, Mobil did something that's predictable today:

      It went super nova and expelled all of its non-core businesses in an effort to collapse into a well-oiled machine. (Note what I did there.)

      So, these days, when I see Apple, for instance, sitting on 240 billion liquidity and buying crazy-ass assets that no one at Apple is qualified to work on, I'm waiting for the explosion.

      Didn't know that about Mobil. I was thinking more along the lines of GE, who has screwed up so royally they cut their dividend to 1 cent and whose stock price is down 66% to $10 a share, roughly what it was during the 09 recession.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Expected return on investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people say "investors" they are usually talking vague generalizations that rarely hold up to strong scrutiny. No different here. Investors aren't any sort of coherent entity.

    5. Re:Expected return on investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liquidity is a benefit. It means reduced bid/ask spreads which previously represented a sort of tax on your investments. The HFT's have no impact on long term investors. Ignore the noise. Nobody is forced to invest in a 401k. You could invest your after-tax profits in forest land or gold bars if you wanted to. 401k's simply provide a tax-friendly investment vehicle. I'd rather have the freedom and flexibility to invest my money versus being forced to use a company pension program run by managers promising sky-high returns while extracting big fees. How many corporate pension programs have failed spectacularly and how many will likely fail in the future? No thanks, it's far less risky these days to invest your money in a broad market security than a single corporate pension program.

  11. Re:Bezos likes sex with farm animals by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 0

    And all that radiation in space won't hurt you. Duh gubmint sez so. Bwahahaha

    AE911Truth Org

    Ok Timmy, pay attention to the teacher up front and quit shit-posting on Slashdot. She will catch you and make you stand in the corner!

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  12. Re: the people who buy off amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off with your xenophobic bullshit

  13. Watch customers leave if they raise prices by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    Apple, Intel and other large firms have raised prices to compensate for slower sales. While Amazon is still growing, they seem to be slowly raising prices on some items. When they get the bright idea to do that on most items, their appeal will go away and their growth will stop. I like Amazon. But, I fully expect them to jack up prices in the name of short term gains. The competition will come back to life when that happens.

  14. Re:quality merchandise problems catching up with t by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    You are not alone. Quality is going down the drain.

    I've been an Amazon customer for 20 years. Last year was the *first* time I ever returned anything. I ordered a wooden chess board. It _arrived_ with a corner damaged despite being in cardboard/foam!? Returned it, bought another one. It ALSO arrived damaged. WTF?! I don't dare take my chances a third time. Plus I can't find a comparable board. (Even tried dedicated chess shops but they don't have anything close to what I want in features, aesthetics, and price.)

    Needless to say, ordering a whole lot LESS this year after being burned.

  15. None of the stuff for sale on amazon is essential by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    Or only a very, very low one-figure percentage of it.

    The rest is people trying to put meaning into their empty lives by buying stuff they don't need from money they often don't have (or should have contributed to self-growth like reading a book or exercising - or make a contribution to their retirement fund).

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  16. Companies can't grow forever? by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    At some point you run out of people wanting to buy your stuff so growth slows. Is this really a surprise? Either try something new or enjoy the profits and keep sailing forward.

  17. If this was Google.... by virtig01 · · Score: 2

    Growth leveling off? If Amazon Retail was a Google product, they would discontinue it and boot off all the users 12 months from now.

  18. predator–prey growth perspective by epine · · Score: 1

    It's entirely possible for exponential growth to slow while your linear growth accelerates.

    From the perspective of the whale, you might want to use the former; from the perspective of what the whale is swallowing, you might want to use the latter.

  19. Declining customer service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Amazon accounts in the US (20 years) and UK (19 years). I noticed problems with Prime in the US, and about a third of my Prime deliveries were late. I complained. I was told by the first person I talked to that I'd receive a refund for Prime for that year. Then I got passed from one customer "service" person to another, and they decided to offer me a $10 credit. I just was so sick of the horrible service, I closed my accounts permanently and let them keep the remainder of my Prime money, as it wasn't worth it for me to keep dealing with people who were so poorly qualified or god knows what. When I would contact Amazon in the UK, the staff were English. In the US, they seem to be from India. And they seem rather cavalier with the way they treat customers. So, fuck Amazon. I'm free of that contemptible company for good.

  20. Some sketchy things by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

    I do love Amazon (Canada) and order at least a few things every week. They've been the most reliable online vendor for me.

    But, I will say .. in the past couple years they have been pulling some sketchy things, at least up here - shipping "prime" items with their own in-house shipper (that's usually late, with no real tracking), shipping straight from China with no real return option (the return label is a postcard, postage required, back to China, making return of items under $50 not economically feasible). Been getting quite a number of knockoffs when I ordered the real thing, lately, too.

    Their review system is under attack from clickfarms, and people know it. To be honest, I feel like this might be their #1 existential threat; if people lose trust in Amazon reviews, there goes one of the major reasons for shopping there in the first place.

    For the mostpart I'm still happy, but they do seem to be sacrificing some amount of quality in exchange for short-term profit, at least up here. That always leads to a decline in revenue (or revenue growth) in the long-term.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  21. Re:None of the stuff for sale on amazon is essenti by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    But what if they buy a self-help book from Amazon?

  22. Re:None of the stuff for sale on amazon is essenti by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    How much is books in terms of turnaround and profit at amazon these days anyway?
    I'd say, the people who buy books are the least problem....

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  23. Can't grow forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foolish to think any business can have infinite growth especially at a rapid pace. Being a Prime member I have seen a lot of products become less of a bargain over the course of months and years. Almost think some added shipping charges are baked in even with Prime. We buy a lot so benefit is still there along with convenience. But I wouldn't say the value of Prime is better today then in the past, no just the opposite.

  24. Why do economists thing the world is flat? by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    The world is round. If you go far enough you end up where you started. That means, there is a limit to growth. Science!

  25. Also by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Consider that the cost of prime has increased, delivery delays have increased, time before actual shipping has increased, the number of items subject to prime shipping has decreased, some "prime" shipping is now not two-day, their search turns up more and more items that are not reasonable results for the search terms you enter, which significantly inconveniences shoppers. They now spam searches with paid insertions. You can't specify things like "heaters -electric" to get a listing of heaters but not electric heaters (nor does searching for "gas heaters" eliminate listings of electric heaters), which increases non-win search results... their search really is pretty terrible; that, at least, is an area they could do something about, but generally, they're reducing functionality, not improving it, so I wouldn't hold my breath for a quality search engine.

    One of the problems with stock-price-driven "we must grow so our stock can be traded up" as opposed to dividend-producing-driven "we must continue to make a profit so our stockholders earn from holding and buying more" is that there is little incentive to avoid trimming anything that can save costs in order to fluff the bottom line.

    Eventually this kind of thing reaches a tipping point. EBay, in fact, is a good example. Auction posting difficulty is way, way up, the original reputation system has been nerfed beyond all recognition (and into near-zero functionality), auction and related auction feedback records have been lost/tossed, payment systems less and less dependable and timely... this kind of attempt-to-profit degradation will always eventually give the golden goose a nasty case of bird flu.

    I think that's exactly what we're seeing with Amazon. They're trimming back the very things that made them attractive to their customer base, while not addressing functional shortcomings like the search tools, all in a quest to report "earnings growth" in order to fluff their stock value. Eventually, those policies will reveal themselves as a cancer that is eating the company from the inside. You can only cut costs and features and service so long before you aren't at all what you used to be.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Searches such as "heaters -electric" certainly do work.

    2. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it wonâ(TM)t matter after driving their competitors out of business. Theyâ(TM)ve already successfully lowered expectations. I would say about 20% of what I receive from amazon is damaged. As in damaged enough that I would not purchase that item from a b&m if it were the only one on the shelf. Amazon blows, but the playbook (drive out your competitors, then drastically reduce your quality and service).

    3. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just tried it, NO IT DOES NOT WORK.

      heaters -electric shows 5 results fully as first-results., 1 is Not applicable, 2 are electric. BZZZT
      "heaters -electric" shows 3 results, and 0 of 3 are electric as first results.

      anybody else also notice their webpage half the time will 100% pin-out a a whole cpu on your system? ... just doing nothing but being on amazon.com.

      Miner? Advertisement-gone-wrong? who the fsck knows, but its been doing that on and off for th e past couple months from various machines i connect from.

    4. Re:Also by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Most of your first paragraph I agree with but FWIW their search has always been shit. I was complaining about it in 2002, I've always been surprised they've never done a thing to improve it.

      Unfortunately there's a fetish among search engine designers, including internal search engines like Amazon's, for "more is more": and let's be honest, if even Google does that, and would rather give you a million irrelevant and time wasting results than admit it couldn't find anything and say "0 results found", what incentive is there for Amazon - who benefit from irrelevant answers because there are plenty of shoppers just browsing and looking for "ideas" - to fix their search engine?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  26. Growth slowing or sales decling? by Dukenukemx · · Score: 1

    With the recent large increase of lay-offs recently and lots of banks having trouble lately like "Well Fargo" it kinda looks like a recession is starting or is already here. If retail stores are closing down and Amazon/Ebay isn't responsible then people just aren't buying stuff.

    https://www.axios.com/us-q1-la...

  27. It had to eventually, however by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It had to slow eventually, however..I could think of a few things as I've spend the last year as a marketplace seller, essentially.

    Products are being ripped down all the time. No products = no sale = no fee for Amazon to collect.

    Search the Amazon forums this week and see how many products are being taken down for containing pesticides. Someone sold a comic book with the character, Poison Ivy, mentioned and now their listing is deactivated.

    Endless stories. Something the average consumer doesn't realize is that free 2 day shipping is not free. Sellers have to raise prices to pay Amazon for Amazon Fulfillment, or to cover their own direct bills if they fulfill it themselves.

    This is about to be seen on Walmart. Basically, the only way to get the sale is to offer "free" 2 day shipping. For a widget under a pound, we may have to raise the product price 4-5 dollars to cover the cost of guaranteed 2 day shipping, coast to coast. But wait! Walmart (just like Amazon and ebay) charge a commission of 15%, so to raise the price 4-5 dollars, it actually needs to be raised 4-5 / (1 - 0.15).

    The effect is everyone pays more for the product. And since shipping costs usually go higher the further the carrier needs to take it, you have to raise your shipping costs by the most expensive possible price, even if the buyer is a mile from the seller.

    Free shipping was one of the dumbest things we, as customers, forced on ourselves. Sure, shady sellers hiding a profit upcharge in a shipping cost was one thing. But outside of that, shipping isn't a flat rate, nor is it free. By building it into the product price, all we have done is raised the price we pay for products ahead of scheduled inflation.

    1. Re:It had to eventually, however by kingbilly · · Score: 1

      I forgot to login to post the above, whoops.

      The other thing to mention is, if Amazon would stop ripping things down, we would be selling more and therefore making them more money.



      One last parting thought We used to have a considerable amount of orders going to customers in the US military. But, our On-Time Delivery performance metric on Amazon started to suffer. Any poor metrics can result in losing sales (due to buybox being unobtainable). The reason the On-Time Delivery metric suffered is because there isn't always a delivery confirmation scan for packages going to US bases overseas. And I don't blame them, there is probably a bit of a security issue with letting people pinpoint some base nicknames, plus it just isn't their priority to mark things as shipped. We had to disable shipping to the armed forces. We felt bad for turning our back on our countrymen and women, but Amazon left us no choice.

      And think about all those sales, where Amazon could have profited 15% off of, but no longer can. That contributed to the data we see in the article today. It is money they left on the table. All they would need to do is change the metric to only consider the 50 US states for domestic shipments.

  28. 800 pound gorilla with muscle growth problems by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Please send ads with Protein products to Bezos@amazon.com

  29. This growth fixation is inadecuate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things that grow too much without control are called cancers and end eating the host's body...
    Economic growth is only a good indicator in small companies, in big companies is just getting bigger and loosing control while hogging resources.

  30. Let the evil begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the point where companies start looking at how to squeeze ever last penny out.

    Expect Amazon to become just as evil as Facebook, Wells Fargo, Comcast, etc. over the next few years.