Slashdot Mirror


Police Are Using Google's Location Data From 'Hundreds of Millions' of Phones (cnet.com)

"When law enforcement investigations get cold, there's a source authorities can turn to for location data that could produce new leads: Google."

An anonymous reader quotes CNET: Police have used information from the search giant's Sensorvault database to aid in criminal cases across the country, according to a report Saturday by The New York Times. The database has detailed location records from hundreds of millions of phones around the world, the report said. It's meant to collect information on the users of Google's products so the company can better target them with ads, and see how effective those ads are. But police have been tapping into the database to help find missing pieces in investigations.

Law enforcement can get "geofence" warrants seeking location data. Those kinds of requests have spiked in the last six months, and the company has received as many as 180 requests in one week, according to the report.... For geofence warrants, police carve out a specific area and time period, and Google can gather information from Sensorvault about the devices that were present during that window, according to the report. The information is anonymous, but police can analyze it and narrow it down to a few devices they think might be relevant to the investigation. Then Google reveals those users' names and other data, according to the Times...

[T]he AP reported last year that Google tracked people's location even after they'd turned off location-sharing on their phones.

Google's data dates back "nearly a decade," the Times reports -- though in a statement, Google's director of law enforcement and information security insisted "We vigorously protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement." (The Times also interviewed a man who was arrested and jailed for a week last year based partly on Google's data -- before eventually being released after the police found a more likely suspect.)

"According to the Times, Google is the primary company that appears to be fulfilling the warrants," reports Gizmodo, adding that Apple "says it can't provide this information to authorities..."

"A thriving black market in location data has persisted despite promises from carriers to stop selling it to middlemen, who divert it from intended uses in marketing and other services."

125 comments

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a great way to catch criminals.

    1. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, citizen, it is.

      Now, papers, please.

    2. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you miss the part where the wrong guy was arrested?

    3. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You, uh, think I read the article? Fuck that.

    4. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the more likely suspect arrested was the guys mom's ex boyfriend. /Quote
      Molina spent a week in jail before friends produced texts and Uber receipts backing up an alibi, while police later arrested Marcos Gaeta, âoehis motherâ(TM)s ex-boyfriend, who had sometimes used Mr. Molinaâ(TM)s carâ and had a âoelengthy criminal record.â /Unquote

    5. Re:Good by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Maybe so but "Law and Order: Ask Google Unit" is going to be a hard show to sit through.

    6. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok, just spend a week in jail innocent person until we let you go. You pay attention; that is in the article.

    7. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No papers? Well, that's a month of PMITA prison time for the first offence, a year for the second and a life for the third strike.

    8. Re: Good by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Some say the real punishment is financial. Legal fees, time lost at work, all of that adds up and you have to deal with it whether you're innocent or not.

    9. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even better it's a great way for a criminal to get away with a crime and leave other people harassed or even convicted based on circumstantial data. Leave your cell phone at home and you have an air tight alibi. Have none at all and you're invisible to the system. With a police state, invisible is the best sort of state to be in.

    10. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who the fuck needs papers? "

      No papers? With that tan? I'm sure you're an illegal immigrant, we'll send you to an ICE cage^h^h^h^hdetention center.

    11. Re: Good by Creepy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh? By posting here without identifying credentials or using an alias violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984. I have you on a class I felony. Speaking of, I need to report myself to termination bay 2 for posting using an alias.

      Kidding aside, the law literally says that. It was designed mostly to protect ATMs but due to loose wording is often used to prosecute almost any computer "crime." You literally can't visit a website legally without giving them identifying credentials first under that law. Even a subscribe to a website page is illegal under that law (you need to provide that information before visiting). The law was partially written for modems, but the writers didn't understand how modems worked - they just saw the 1984 movie War Games and panicked.

    12. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck needs papers? I have a phone...

      Of course, you're right, thanks to your google phone the cops already know you.

    13. Re:Good by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

      eh its a usefull tool but it needs used as only part of the puzzle. Aresting and holding someone just because they were in areas is not acceptable. now looking into them passively or useig this is a start to find more connections ,maybe..

    14. Re:Good by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't any self-respecting criminal (or regular citizen, for that matter) not disable Google Location History? Or do you not believe that that really keeps your location history out of this Sensorvault DB?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    15. Re: Good by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? "Disabling" your Google location history does nothing but prevent you from seeing your own data.

      We live in a totalitarian police state. Big Brother Google is ALWAYS watching.

    16. Re: Good by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Papers? LOL, That's so 20th Century. With Google glass they already know who you are. They already have all of your information in front of them. They've already linked you to possible crimes.

      All that is left is to arrest you.

  2. Can they get apkâ(TM)s address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iâ(TM)m gonna kick his bitch ass.

  3. So they never delete anything? by gweihir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will make it a lot easier for the next fascist government to identify all those that were at the "wrong" events or ever physically close to the "wrong" people, even decades later.

    This data should be deleted after at most a year.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:So they never delete anything? by Required+Snark · · Score: 2

      Isn't the current fascist government good enough?

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    2. Re:So they never delete anything? by dknj · · Score: 1

      I was thinking how did the last fascist government abuse this data?

      -dk

    3. Re:So they never delete anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend, we live in the age of cheap storage. Nothing will ever be deleted, ever again. Instead, might I suggest never collecting the data in the first place?

    4. Re:So they never delete anything? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That would be preferable, yes.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:So they never delete anything? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The cost of collect it all and keep it all is less than sorting.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:So they never delete anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the current one? I know numerous people who have been and others who currently are being pursued by the fascist government we have in the US. They have been locking up my friends, planting evidence, lying about anything and everything, restricting all of our freedoms, and worse. They've murdered millions of innocent people and used insignificant attacks to justify it. They control other governments via various means.

    7. Re:So they never delete anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Will make it a lot easier for the next fascist government to identify all those that were at the "wrong" events or ever physically close to the "wrong" people, even decades later."

      The word you're looking for is 'collusion'.

    8. Re: So they never delete anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LARP: Live Action Role Playinf

  4. Protip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take advantage of the precious few years we have left where your always-on general purpose tracking and surveillance device is still optional and non-implanted to leave it at home whenever you go out to shoot people or whatever.

    Or at the very least use iShit, but only as long as you live in a country where Apple considers it more profitable (and where corporations are powerful and unregulated enough) to make a big public show about fighting government surveillance rather than a country where they instead capitulate to it totally.

    1. Re: Protip by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Just logging out of Google (delete the Google account on your phone) can make a difference. There is no requirement that a Google account be active to use your Android phone. There are app updates available elsewhere. You can still be tracked, but logging out makes it you more difficult to track.

    2. Re:Protip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think using Apple iThingies will protect you from gov't intrusions, think again.

    3. Re:Protip by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Not sure I can agree w/ the use of iDevices from that standpoint; at least some Android devices still have removable batteries.

  5. Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need laws saying such things can only be used when the crime is homicide or something heinous. Where the crime involves violence where typical offenders get a sentence of not less than 15 years.
    Also, access to the data must be granted on a specific case by case basis and judges making such approvals rotated out every year or 5 request approvals, whichever is first.

    1. Re:Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's wrong. Our devices should not work that way. It is too easy to be accused of wrongdoing, and have our privacy further violated. You will be added to a watchlist for the unsolved crime. You employer will likely be contacted by the police and they will not tell you. Your career could end simply because you were in the vicinity of a crime.

      Never, never give a company or the police more information than absolutely necessary.

    2. Re:Wtf by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Simple fix: Just give _any_ crime at least a 15 years sentence. I am sure you would find plenty of people that would think that a good idea.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Wtf by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I think we need a law that says companies like Google are not allowed to retain this sort of intimate data for such a long time. Though I fully agree with the idea that if such data is allowed to be used, there needs to be sufficient cause, with access requiring a warrant.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Wtf by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      That’s gonna be tough on the litterers...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they shouldn't be allowed to have it in the first place.

    6. Re:Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need laws saying such things can only be used when the crime is homicide or something heinous. Where the crime involves violence where typical offenders get a sentence of not less than 15 years.
      Also, access to the data must be granted on a specific case by case basis

      That's exactly what a warrant is.

      I realize it is a whole four sentences into the summary where it explicitly says the data is obtained with a warrant, so it's assured you didn't read that far, but that means a court on a case by case basis decides to grant police access to googles data.

      The fact this is happening shouldn't be the problem, that is exactly how the system is intended to work.

      Separately however, your complaint for *why* those warrants are issued, is a fair point to bring up.
      Personally I don't agree the reasoning should be so limited, although those reasons should certainly be prioritized over lesser crimes.

      But I am curious why you think lesser sentenced crimes should be excluded? Those can be harmful as well even if to a lesser degree.
      Or is that just your threshold to make it worth the privacy violation?

      If someone burnt down my house, or assaulted me without a deadly weapon, or even stole my car, I'd still want the police to use everything at their disposal to catch the ones that did it. I agree having limited resources means worse crimes like homicide should be put above, but so long as that isn't the issue I don't think they should be denied access to a warrant just due to the crimes sentencing guidelines.

      Right now the line is between civil cases and criminal cases. I think that's a good place to have it.

  6. Bruce Wayne. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Police have used information from the search giant's Sensorvault database to aid in criminal cases across the country, according to a report Saturday by The New York Times. The database has detailed location records from hundreds of millions of phones around the world, the report said. It's meant to collect information on the users of Google's products so the company can better target them with ads, and see how effective those ads are. But police have been tapping into the database to help find missing pieces in investigations.

    Batman would be proud.

  7. LineageOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does moving your Android phone to a Lineage build solve the tracking problems?

    1. Re:LineageOS by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think not. Much of the stored data is on the server side, for applications like "google Maps" and "Uber" and "Lyft" and "Weather" that have legitimate reasons to know where you are. Your cell phone's identifying information, such as its connection in the cell phone data networks, its GPS, and the detected nearby wifi access points is part of how it determines the current location, and all of that can be stored on the server side, associated with any unique characteristics of your phone. Even if the attributes are not unique, such as MAC address from cheap NIC cheapsets, the data can be correlated with other data from nearby or from the same time period to help identify a target.

      I am curious how the data is stored, and what it is optimized to provide answers for. Individual device tracking, and a record of all other MAC addresses seen during their use, is certainly a desirable goal for intelligence agencies.

    2. Re:LineageOS by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      Not if you install Google Apps.

    3. Re: LineageOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could run Linux on your phone like the privacyenhanced.blogspot.com guy.
      https://youtu.be/TdXP8hpTwXY

    4. Re: LineageOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly, if you install no Google services on he phone. But even then, is there any way to ever be sure?

    5. Re: LineageOS by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Not all google services require a logged in account to function. There are workarounds.

      I even play Pokemon Go (Niantic is owned by Google) without a Google account on my phone.

      We should all, always, work to make it more expensive to track us.

    6. Re:LineageOS by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Well, who says you need to use those applications? You can run Lineage, and then not use any data-stealing "apps" like Google*, FAcebook*, Amazon*, Uber, Lyft, etc. The whole modern world is under this insane delusion that *nobody* can survive without using the same "apps" they themselves use. I happily live my life without giving up my data to companies like that.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re:LineageOS by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The point is that using an Android pone with a Lineage build does not solve the tracking privacy issue. Much of the problem is on the server side, irrelevant of the quality of the local cell phone. It's built into the services that a cell phone is most useful for, such as map functions, Lyft, and the next generation of E911 services.

    8. Re:LineageOS by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I just need a phone for email, testing, and phone calls. I don't use maps or "apps". The only tracking that I have to worry about is from the cell provider (if using cell service at all).

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  8. What did we build? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate what we've built. I've never used Facebook, Twitter, or a smartphone. Google never respected the U.S. So many of their employees did not grow up w/ American values. After 20 years, Google has only added bars to our prison. I'm done w/ Google.

    1. Re: What did we build? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You built nothing, but you sure like to use the royal we.

    2. Re: What did we build? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen up, child: everyone here built some part of the internet.

      We used to think we were building the infrastructure of freedom and prosperity. But our hopes were wrong. It turns out we were building the tools of servitude and immiseration.

  9. Apple "says it can't provide this information..." by swell · · Score: 1

    Left or Right? Democrat or Republican? C++ or Fortran? Pro or Anti Apple? We are polarized in so many ways. Let's not let our bias work against our vested interests however. Where privacy matters there is only one company that provides hardware that stands out.

    Yes, it's certainly a marketing gimmick. Apple was slow to capitalize on the advertising / sale of customer info bandwagon. Now, to cover that error before shareholders, they present that as a 'feature'. "See," they will tell investors, "we've locked in customer loyalty by not selling them out!"

    It's a fragile benefit to Apple buyers. For now they can trust that Apple will protect their privacy rather diligently. But corporate winds change like the tide and the future may not be so kind to Apple consumers.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  10. Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This time around Anne Frank's diary will be on a remote wipeable smartphone, and it won't take them years to find them hiding in a attic or cellar, it will just take a check of facebook posts and friends webs to track down and purge the undesirable cultural, relgious, sexual, or ethnic groups we need demonized for the temporary stability of our regime. Of course the addition this time, is that we can take DNA samples from everyone and sequence them so even the most tenuous member of a group can be ethnically purged, and only our purest brethren saved and allowed into leadership positions in the party.

    You think I am kidding? Just watch.

    1. Re: Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good comment, but implies that the first Hitler was of 'pure origin'. Far from it; for leaders, other rules apply.

      And another hint: peopld often hate most passionately the atrributes they don't like on themselves...

    2. Re:Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course the addition this time, is that we can take DNA samples from everyone and sequence them so even the most tenuous member of a group can be ethnically purged, and only our purest brethren saved and allowed into leadership positions in the party."

      Even now, as we write, murderers are getting ripped out their comfortable homes, just because their great-aunt Marjorie decided to send in her DNA to check out her ancestry.

    3. Re: Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't _really_ believe the police have any interest in solving murders... do you??

  11. targeted ads by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's meant to collect information on the users of Google's products so the company can better target them with ads

    After all those billions spent, I am still waiting for my first relevant ad. I either see ads for products I have no interest in at all, or ads for products I have already looked at.

    1. Re:targeted ads by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ads are basically a scam. They tell the customers that effectiveness of an ad is determined by time wasted. That is obviously not true, but made the whole business rich and a massive negative factor for anybody else.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:targeted ads by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Targeted ads are not about sending specific ads to interested individuals (even though they try and sell them to us as such, with words like "improved experience" and "more relevant"). Data like this is merely used to place a bunch of demographic tags on us: age, interests, income, job, political leaning, sexual orientation etc. Advertisers then target specific demographic groups that might be interested in their products. If your product appeals to republican lesbians who haven't had a haircut in the last 4 weeks, then you can target them, pay for 1,000 impressions rather than 10,000,000, and still be likely to hit the 2 prospects who are actually interested in your stuff. The odds that you are one of those 2 are decidedly poor in both cases, that's why the ads don't seem any more relevant to you even though they are "targeted"

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:targeted ads by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I suspect that Google doesn't really care too much about accuracy, as long as they can convice the advertisers that the ads are targeted.

      I've noticed that their recommended links from the home screen align much better with my interests than the ads I see, so they do have the data.

    4. Re:targeted ads by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      After all those billions spent, I am still waiting for my first relevant ad. I either see ads for products I have no interest in at all, or ads for products I have already looked at.

      Perhaps you should check your settings. Google has ad options, one of which is "non personalized ads" where they will show you only generic ads. You can set it to show the ads Google thinks are most relevant to you instead.

      I set mine to be generic to keep down the creepy factor of having my searches show up in the ads.

    5. Re:targeted ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get ads for Google FI in my gmail app ... on a Pixel phone on Google Fi.

    6. Re: targeted ads by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "Advertising" is just a distraction, a convenient excuse for snooping. More and more people are realizing that Big Brother Google and Faceboot make all their money from selling surveillance data to Uncle Sam and other repressive governments.

  12. News flash- Police go after lower hanging fruit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like drugs being legal until made illegal, technology can be used to incriminate previously as yet proven guilty partys. Now, the bigger fish swim away while law enforcement shoot the smaller fish as if they were in a receptacle assembled by coopers.

  13. Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the latest unsealed indictment, in particular the two way traffic between Donald Trump Junior and Russian intelligence Guccifer 2.0.... It seems Barr is hiding multiple felonies. Not just receiving information from the hack, Trump Jr, requesting information, distributing stolen passwords and more. These are all straight felonies.

    You have Barr, who'se covering up felonies, you have Mitch McConnell who won't let Republican controlled Senate vote on anything Trump would veto, effectively making the Republican(!) Senate Trump's bitch, so Fascists state is already here. All of that private data is already accessible to an unindicted co-conspirator, and so all accessible to team Putin, and the mechanisms of prosecution are blocked by just two bad actors.

    https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

    1. Re:Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with your conclusion. The indictment doesn't mention Donald Trump Jr. There is no mention that any Trump campaign member that knew how the information was acquired. Maybe it was downloaded from an unsecure closet email server. Donald Trump Jr. would not have known how the information was obtained...

      Maybe the whole thing was orchestrated by John Brennan including the hacking and fake Russian defendants.

    2. Re:Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think our CIA / contractors / friends have hacked into Russian facilities and framed them. Indeed our actions would be felonies and maybe the 'deep state' members are soon to be charged.

    3. Re:Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realistically, I don't think it matters.

      What does matter is *any* form of foreign influence in an election. It doesn't matter if, well hell... if Canada decided to try and sway an election. You don't put up with it. You put measures in place to prevent it.

      And if it can be proven, beyond a reasonable doubt that it affected the election in any appreciable way? You have a *new* election.

      This is the astonishing lack of comprehension I've seen from both sides. Even Democrats seem more upset with "collusion" than "interference". And yet when Trump goes on about "fake news", it's almost like the Democrats don't care.. because Trump is slanting it like a partisan thing, and the Dems are following along.

      As a foreigner watching this, it freaks me out a bit. Fuck with the election process of free nations, and you effectively end free nations.

      Let me ask you all something... I know the US has very public Primaries. I've watched them from time to time. How do you know foreign powers aren't screwing with *that*? Wouldn't that be even an easier process to mess with?

      And that is probably more dangerous, because you guys only, bizarrely, have *two* parties -- and that's that. Mess with Primaries, with reduced scrutiny and less of the public eye involved... and you could simply turn BOTH parties into "Pro Foreign Nation", or even just "Leave Foreign Nation Alone" sorts.

      How about messing with both parties, so they reduce military funding? Or mess with the media in some way, so that the gatekeepers (CIA, etc) look bad (or worse)? Or mess with .. anything?

      Like the CIA, the NSA or not -- they DO serve a purpose. For stories of what can "go wrong" when you dismantle an intelligence apparatus, and create a new one, look at the story of the RCMP, their overstep (Watch "The UnCanadians" -- a documentary), which with a few other things led to the dismantlement of their intelligence branch, and its replacement with CSIS.

      Yet during that gap, during that change over in responsibility? The watchers were confused, watched no more, leading to one of the world's biggest air disasters.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182

      Imagine, say... the CIA being dismantled and replaced. Or having its duties overtaken by others? That's a great hole to take advantage of, and what of foreign interference to speed that along?

      There is a LOT to complain about. And a LOT needs to be fixed. Definitely. 100%. But I think care needs to be taken with how these things are fixed, and how they are spoken of. And frankly, I think 90% of the concern I read about online, is from foreigners saying "CIA bad".

      Americans -- decide amongst yourselves -- prevent foreign interventions in elections of any kind, rule *yourselves*.

    4. Re:Already here by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Discounting outright ballot fraud, influencing the outcome of political elections has always been a past time available to a very small fraction of the richest and most powerful humans on the planet. For the longest time, consolidation of the distribution of news to the public was a popular way to shape opinion by political Kingmakers. These activities have rarely been constrained within the sovereign border the Kingmaker resides.

      Totalitarian regimes lock down control of the press and constantly monitor for dissent. In nations with the freedom to use the ballot box, wealthy individuals seeking power bought up newspaper, radio, and television properties to control the flow of information to the voting citizens.

      Making life difficult for the rich and powerful, we have this damn internet thingie that virtually anyone can use to attempt to shape public opinion, even on a shoestring budget. I suppose at the very least, we have democratized the influencing business.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re: Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such an idiot. Idiotic doesn't even begin to describe your logic.

      Apparently, you are completely unaware that foreign corporations, including Russians, legally lobby our politicians.. all. day. every. day.

      The entire premise of foreign 'influence' on our elections is a big farce.

      Stop making a complete idiot out of yourself dude

    6. Re: Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will add, some Americans decide who to vote for based on which foot hit the floor first when they got out of bed on election day.

      Furthermore, by your logic, any lie told by any candidate during an election would be grounds to nullify the election. Don't be dumb. People vote for stupid reasons and the root problem is that we let every adult vote, regardless of their intelligence. It's too bad for progress but anything short of it is opression.

    7. Re: Already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such an idiot. Idiotic doesn't even begin to describe your logic.

      Apparently, you are completely unaware that foreign corporations, including Russians, legally lobby our politicians.. all. day. every. day.

      The entire premise of foreign 'influence' on our elections is a big farce.

      Stop making a complete idiot out of yourself dude

      Forgive the fool his foolishness. He has been watching Rachael Maddow nonstop for two years and he has lost all sense of reality. He only came inside last week from screaming at the sky.

    8. Re: Already here by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It's too bad for progress

      What the heck is that? Do you have an objective definition? Maybe we can scrap the whole voting thing entirely and let you just run things!

  14. While slashdot filth demonise Assange again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get the usual statist LIE from slashdot that phone networks have to be 'requested' for phone location data.

    In reality, every major phone network provides real time direct access to location data for the intelligence agencies of host nations.

    Here's a fact. Years ago, US TV shows commonly had dramas where viewers were made aware that the US government had access to phone location data for ALL phones. Then the NSA gave the major networks new guidelines. Overnite the dramas changed. Now only phones with GPS could be tracked, and then only if the phone was used to make/receive a call. A complete and total lie- a lie repeated by sites like Slashdot.

    Low brained politicians always fret about anything informing potential 'criminals', and these dribblers become the excuse mechanism used by their Deep State masters. Low brained politicians (the sh-t that appears daily on US TV) don't believe in Fredom of Speech, Conscience or assembly, cos they are low b-etas, and thus think the sheeple they represent would 'abuse' such freedoms. The evil alphas high above them exploit this low b-eta psychology.

    The braindead dribblers who still think this site 'good' are all middle to low b-etas who likewise think freedoms are only good 'in theory'. but in practice sheeple must be protected from their natural instrincts. Hence all the filth here cheering the arrest of Assange.

    Slashdot supporters applaud the Deep State total surveillance initiatives. They are the same garbage that makes up the common poster on Reddit.

    Of course, the nature of B-etas causes periods of relative societal decency to come to a vilent crashing end. B-etas always cheer the rise of evil alphas- the very reason Plato's Republic decries 'democracy' as a terrible system. 'People power' ALWAYS equals evil alpha power in the end, as the West is now discovering to Humanity's cost.

    There is a large section of society disgusted by the opinions of the average Slashdot/Reddit scumbag, but that section of society has too large a proportion of powerless people. The authoritarian warmongering average person here will have their way, and Clinton/Blair's desire to see the West use nuclear warheads with the same readiness as the West used depleted uranium will become reality very soon. The police state beloved by Slashdot is designed to help the world lurch into the next World War.

    1. Re: While slashdot filth demonise Assange again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve? Steve Bannon?

    2. Re: While slashdot filth demonise Assange again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a nerd since the 80s, and reading /. since the 90s, when has /. Ever claimed that cell phones with GPS could only ne tracked when making a call. I think that every educated nerd on this site has been aware that a cell phone is a personal spying device.and has been for a long long time.

    3. Re: While slashdot filth demonise Assange again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cousin worked for a cell company in the early 90s and even then they had a fancy Marconi scanner that could triangulate and plot the general cell location to within a few hundred meters. Then, they just tracked you with a directional antenna, the whole time listening to your unencrypted conversation on plain analog.

  15. Re:News flash- Police go after lower hanging fruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The supreme court was right.. Cell phones are more intrusive than an ankle bracelet..

    https://www.npr.org/2018/06/22/605007387/supreme-court-rules-police-need-warrant-to-get-location-information-from-cell-to

  16. Some hints for the terminally stupid by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    1) If you are going to commit a crime. leave your phone at home. Are there apps that can call other people at pre-scheduled times? Sounds like an alibi to me.

    2) Don't livestream your crime to bookface, or your piles of money, drugs, or weapons.

    3) Give a bum some money, have them buy you a couple non-sequential serial burner phones.

    1. Re:Some hints for the terminally stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better to still have a phone. It'll have to be burner phones paid with cash from stores with no security cameras. So that they can be tipped by their inside man/woman from police or spotter out of encrypted radio range. Yes having a personal phone on you during premeditated crime is stupid.

  17. Betch Trump pardones Assange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm betting Trump will tell Assange "he has friends in high places", and dangle a pardon as means to getting him to shut up about the Donald Trump junior discussion.

    And Konstantine Kilimink, because he knew about the Trump Tower Moscow deal, and kept it secret as Trump was lying about it to his Fox and Friends followers.

    And the other Russian GRU staffers who did the hack, because they did the grunt work needed. If you see the new indictments being unsealed as Barr tries to hide the evidence, all of that was know to Devin Nunes, the Republican head of the Intelligence committee, to the other Trump supporters and to Rand Paul prior to his visit to Moscow. They knew how deep it was, and went to Russia to cut cooperation deals knowing Russia had undermined the election.

    Russia helped Trump, it can help Rand Paul become President or Devin Nunes become President or William Barr become President....

    1. Re:Betch Trump pardones Assange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia helped Trump,

      [citation of facts needed sorely]

  18. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend, if Google are being forces to handover this information, there is zero chance Apple is not.
    It matters little as this location information is gathered by the telcos anyway.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_tracking

  19. It's worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the companies that collect this data have vulnerable storage of the raw data. If the NSA is willing to spend the money to analyze, they can harvest the raw, ananonymized data by tapping the exposed load balancers or copying the logs from the hosts in AWS or elsewhere. And so can every other nation's security experts and moles, by getting employees inside those companies to steal encryption keys or access keys. It's just not that well secured.

  20. Hard boiled frogs by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I simply don't understand how this behavior can be tolerated by anyone.

    1. Re:Hard boiled frogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Shut up, The Kardashians are on!

    2. Re:Hard boiled frogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is tolerated by two groups: 1) the ignorant and 2) the bought off - they simply don't care because they feel a part of a safe flock of sheep that as long as others are violated equally it is okay and they accept the service willfully ignoring the risk.

  21. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I steal a ham from Kroger, take it home and put it in my smart fridge that senses I have added ham, will the police be able to access this data and obtain a search warrant?

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We hope so. And you should answer not only to the state, but also to the Kroger company for your criminal behaviour.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a turkey?

  22. Gee, sure glad I disabled GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, sure glad I dismantled my cheap dumbphone (because I'm not stupid and don't want a so-called 'smartphone'), identified the GPS antenna, and shorted it to ground, effectively disabling any GPS functions permanently. Oh and IDGAF about cell tower triangulation that's not very accurate at all, and the phone is off when I'm not using it anyway. Enjoy getting sucked up in random police dragnets and grilled about crimes you had nothing to do with, especially if you're not white, because we're living in the most racist times since before the Civil War.

    1. Re:Gee, sure glad I disabled GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, cell towers do matter. Most times I've heard of location data being used, it isn't "He was at house $x!", because one can always blast a hole in that level of accuracy.

      No, it's used in conjunction with other evidence to completely damn one. Such as "he did this and this, said this, and then was in the area that night, at that time!".

      Used to be they'd have a witness see you in the vicinity, and if you had an alibi it would negate/help that. So said cell phone removes the alibi angle, giving additional strength to other evidence, providing for arrest, interrogation, and the collection via warrant for even MORE data.

      Look at what happened to buddy in the article! Precisely this, and while proven innocent? Had to work at it...

  23. No worries ... by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    And people wonder why I still use a "dumb" phone. My cellular provider may know where I am, but Google doesn't.

  24. up your paranoid level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove the batteries and only look at missed calls and listen to voice mail in fixed location you don't mind governments knowing. Like your home or work since they already know where you work and live anyway.

  25. Is the data reliable? by AxeTheMax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I look at my location history sometimes, especially after long trips. Two years ago on reviewing a trip to India it said I had been in Patna, a city I've never been within several hundred miles of. So I knew it was not dependable. I've just looked up the location history for that period in detail. It is still there. It says that I was in Domino's Pizza in Ashok Rajpath Rd, Chowk, Patna, it also says that I then travelled a distance of 1100 miles to a place in southern India where I had actually been, in 13 minutes, by car. It was probably caused by someone identifying a business address wrongly, but it is absolutely not reliable. Lawyers should question its accuracy.

    1. Re:Is the data reliable? by kinko · · Score: 1

      I look at my location history sometimes, especially after long trips. Two years ago on reviewing a trip to India it said I had been in Patna, a city I've never been within several hundred miles of. So I knew it was not dependable. I've just looked up the location history for that period in detail. It is still there. It says that I was in Domino's Pizza in Ashok Rajpath Rd, Chowk, Patna, it also says that I then travelled a distance of 1100 miles to a place in southern India where I had actually been, in 13 minutes, by car. It was probably caused by someone identifying a business address wrongly, but it is absolutely not reliable. Lawyers should question its accuracy.

      when I moved countries (but took my wireless router with me), google used to think I was still at my old location for the first several months (when I was connected my to wifi). I guess until the next time a google car drove past and got the new location of the AP mac address...

    2. Re:Is the data reliable? by aberglas · · Score: 1

      It would be admissible in court. I reckon that bad data would be hard to argue against.

    3. Re:Is the data reliable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Google we're talking about. They're on par with the Keystone Cops.

    4. Re:Is the data reliable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crime that happened there in Patna that you did not commit? Well, there's evidence you were there, so you can be arrested when it is convenient or necessary to preserve profits.

    5. Re:Is the data reliable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was on a ship, and no matter where I was in the world, as long as the phone could pick up the wifi, it said I was in Norway. Didn't matter that the phone could see a dozen GPS satellites that said otherwise.

      I wonder if you could build something to simulate a known wifi that you could carry with you? Or a few known wifi's?

  26. WindBourne, quick blame China !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WindBourne, quick blame China !!

  27. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple can't hand over what they don't have. Google keeps your location history and Apple might not have any data to give or it could be encrypted in a way that even Apple can't access it.

  28. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Google's not being forced. They're profiting from selling your location.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  29. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's certainly a marketing gimmick.

    I mean, it's a feature that makes me prefer Apple. Is it a gimmick, or do they recognize there are people willing to pay to not be tracked? Is' there qany feature taht is not a gimmick in your eyes?

    And maybe Aple changes in the future, but that seems less likely. They make tons of money now, why change? Although Microsoft was makign tons of money pre-Windows 10, so...

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  30. Morton's Fork by mentil · · Score: 1

    Walled garden in one ecosystem, pervasive spying in the other. Hmm...

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re: Morton's Fork by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Pervasive spying in _all_ ecosystems. Welcome to Soviet America, comrade. Papers please!

  31. It's not anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google claims our location data is anonymous, but it's not anonymous if it can be looked up.

    1. Re:It's not anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I call bullshit. Example: Location data says "someone" lives at my address, commutes to my work, visits x, y, z friends, banks at my bank. Pair that data with someone tagging me or with a purchase I made and connect it to all the location data and you've been identified.
      My guess is they are using weasel words to say the _location_ data is anonymous, but they have _other_ data that can be associated which is not anonymous.
      All their services are designed to unmask your identity (eg. provide the "other" half of the data to identify you).

      Here's a good rant by someone who just realized Google is saving all (7 years worth) of their "voice to text" utterances: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vWAF13KigI

  32. The Times or the New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which one is it? The summary seems confused between the two.

  33. power button by AlleyTrotte · · Score: 1

    the simple reason that phones/tablets need a physical power off switch which actually disconnects the battery AMEN

  34. Sensorvault database?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the bloodclot is a Sensorvault database? That sounds like an egregious use of their customer data

    1. Re: Sensorvault database?! by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      It's a nicer-sounding euphemism for "blackmail database".

  35. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Australia, normally the police subpoena the geo-location data of the phone company. Unless they have their own stingray like device which harvests everybodys location within tower range -even if there is only one person of interest.

  36. Re:Apple "says it can't provide this information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't get your logic. You seem to be taking their marketing at face value. Apple joined PRISM in 2012. They seem to spy at least as much as any other company. The only difference is that, as with their devices, they want tight control over their product. Apple also shows no sign of any interest in moral values. They use virtual slave labor, offshore their money to avoid taxes, and deliberately design hardware to maximize sales. I wouldn't trust Apple any more than I'd trust Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook -- except in high profile cases where Tim Cook sees a chance to make Apple look like a white knight.

  37. officer overseer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All empires run on slavery, and use informants to keep the slaves in line

  38. Just find something you like and click it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I've been getting nonstop ads for Gundam model kits. Too lazy to build them anymore so I haven't bought anything, but I click and ogle the kits every now and then (current gen Master Grades are damn near as good as perfect grades were when I was a kid, just need to add the LEDs yourself).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. GOOD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, unlike what self-appointed SJWs & "Privacy Advocates/Watchdogs" & anti-government anarchists always try to claim/portray, general public is NOT obsessed w/ privacy (ask FB for example) & always like/happy to help law enforcement to catch criminals!!!

    1. Re:GOOD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too broad a brush. Who exactly is the general public? The U.S. constitution shows we are all obsessed w/ opposing an oppressive government, as a default for living here. That is why we sometimes overlook such infractions because we believe they will not stand when they are investigated. It is the faith in our constitution that gives individuals confidence to participate in networks like FB.

      It is not about you helping law enforcement to catch criminals, but, you being wrongly accused and imprisoned or put to death because of incomplete data. Both of these outcomes have occurred because of wrongful pressures and bad evidence.

      We shouldn't have to take the locks off of our home so that investigators can freely search us for some kind of evidence to persuade a jury, especially when the poorest cannot amount much of a defense.

      If you don't care about your privacy, please post your email address and password.

      dumbshit

  40. Re:It's worse (more worse) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA could just alter the data so "YOU WERE THERE"

  41. Re: Apple "says it can't provide this information. by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    I met a German traveler the other day. He built a niche app for parking management. (Think big institutional parking lots.). He said that selling data to the gestapo is a big part of his business. Apparently Big Brother pays his collaborators well.

  42. search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fastest growing search engine, If you need to look up anything in private, without being tracked use the search engine that owns its own search results, pass it on

  43. The wisdom of Matt Groening by rot26 · · Score: 1

    As Bart Simpson says "It never hurts to have an extra set of fingerprints on your knife." Or something like that.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  44. This is why the Bill of Rights matters by strikethree · · Score: 1

    (The Times also interviewed a man who was arrested and jailed for a week last year based partly on Google's data -- before eventually being released after the police found a more likely suspect.)

    This is why dragnets are so evil. The only thing that matters is if it can be pinned on you, not whether or not you were guilty.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  45. Oh! NO! They'll find me... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    Very boring.