Slashdot Mirror


BFRIS Goes Gold

rpete writes "LinuxGames is reporting that BFRIS, the new game from Aegis Simulation Technologies, has gone gold. Is this the first shrink-wrapped game for Linux? "

63 comments

  1. COOL (i8086/Fishhead) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh looks like I may have got the first post and anyways this is a cool thing. I knew it was only a matter of time before M$ lemmings begin to break ranks.

    i8086/Fishhead

  2. super cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally - a nice lookin game that gives me a reason to move my voodoo2 to my linux box.

    We need more!! woohoo!!

  3. They really really really like Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the graphics on the game company's webpage were made using script-fu tekneek with gimp and free/sharefonts. I recognize them :) They must really really really really like linux

    and that crillee font
    :)

  4. Very cool :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I need a Voodoo 2 now!

  5. Way Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't usually like action games, but I'd definitely pay for this. Heck, I'd get two copies just so I could have a mint unopened edition of the first shrink wrapped Linux game.

  6. ABSOLUTE PIECE OF CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF IT ISN'T OPEN SOURCE, IT SUCKS.

  7. I am going to buy it on pure principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux needs games badly. (Well, I do anyway). Every Linux user that are remotely interested in games should consider buying this game, to show the games developers (and developers in general) that we are prepared to pay good money for the software we want to have.

    I know I will buy it, even though I am mostly into fps'ers and strategy stuff.

  8. Everyone should put on their web page...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The day and the reason why they bought this game. Then email the URL to the company.

    If we are gonna rail a company for not supporting linux (ATI for instance) then we ought to throw a ticker tape parade for those that do!

    Linux inside - fear the power!

  9. No VOODOO yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I'll buy it anyway!

  10. No VOODOO yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I'll buy the game anyway!

  11. Linux game...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just see in a while, when the sales will be disappointing and if they do Linux-only version they *will* be disappointing, then later publishers will be resistant to publish any linux=only games. The whole idea will be phacked.

    -als

  12. hardware support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it mentioned hardware acceleration for ati,
    would this include the linux version?

    This game looks like descent with network support,
    I will definately buy it if they produce a demo that works well
    on my pc.

  13. Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The downloadable AVI of the game makes it look like 3D Asteroids. Not necessarily a bad thing, in itself--but kinda lame as a First Linux Game.

  14. gone gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, did it sell a million copies or something?

  15. looks terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok.. first off, something HAS to be done about the name.. BFRIS has got to be the worst name for a game I have EVER heard. It is not catchy at all.. who in their right mind would read a list of game names and say, hmm.. BFRIS.. that sounds like a good game, maybe ill check it out. But lets give them the benefit of the doubt, maybe they will check it out. Those screenshots look TERRIBLE. They are nothing more then crappily rendered spheres with box here and there. The lighting is horrible too. It does not look realistic at all. ok, maybe they just look terrible because it's in beta.. but its looking pretty grim.

  16. scores.. what the heck? (Score: 666) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    excuse my profanity, but by whom and how the heck scores are given?

  17. Without the source? A while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feh, ok...without the source, software is total BS

    what got x86 platform to be a majority is this, people write software with no clue!

    I'd like too see other companies than Id make portable code, no messy i386 source dependency, not using proprietary API that require NDA to compile the library source. I'm not saying developers have to piss in Intel's general direction, just configure optimizations optional.

  18. gone gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many boxes must a game sell before it is
    called "a hit"? Seems like almost any games uses
    that term.

  19. I hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I agree with those folks who are down on this game. I want to support developers who are taking the lead in multiplatform gaming, but to be downright honest, those screenshots imply some pretty cheesy gameplay.

    It looks like descent-in-a-box, without all the fun.

    It's good to see that they're supporting multiple 3D hardware accelerators, though! Maybe there's some hope for that old Rendition card...

  20. Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I agree the web page is pretty cheesy looking. It could be worse, but it would take a little effort and a blink tag.

  21. BFRIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is moaning about the name.. However, I think it's preety cool..
    They dont say what it means anyplace.. But Big fucking rocks in space sound's kinda good.

    One thing to say about the screenshots, those are the same ones that were on the site 9months ago.

  22. NVidia is looking nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read the topic. The new riva TNT thing is smooth like butter

  23. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it say "must have mesa and 3dfx acceleration -- no seoftware rendering".

    this statement seems funny to me. isn't mesa a "opengl-like" wrapper around the hardware?

    wouldn't the software-only version of mesa support the game just fine?

    sorry 'bout the ignorance, but i had to ask.
    ---
    John

  24. We Should support it out of principle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should buy the game and try it out. We need to support companies which make decnt products for Linux so that they can REALLY improve them. If we blow off a company which is stretching it's neck out to hopefully help the Linux community, then no other company with follow. The best games will not come out for Linux alone, or even Linux first. But we need to start somewhere. And I think they've done a decent job for a "new" company.

    -Anstinus

  25. ABSOLUTE PIECE OF CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey man... that was obviously a joke, or you're
    one of the new breed of winblowz lusers trying
    to give linux users a bad name, but please
    refrain...

    AndyM

  26. Linux game...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you, oh seer of the future

    maybe i should take you gambling with me... you'll
    know what numbers are about to come up I bet.

    you arrogant, luser sod.

    AndyM

  27. Macross sim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I accidentally hit the submit button before
    "un-ACing" myself...

    Respectfully,
    Kevin Christie

  28. looks terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the should have named it FuzzleBunnies 3D?

  29. BFRIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Fucking Rocks In Space!

  30. ABSOLUTE PIECE OF CRAP by Nick · · Score: 1

    Beleive it or not, commercial non-free programs does benefit the linux community.

    --
    Fuck Ajit Pai
  31. How long till the demo? by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by frogbert:

    There's no information about the demo on their downloads page, but mention elsewhere of a demo "shortly after retail release". Anyone have any idea how long we wait?

  32. well....good! by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by mackgaAThome:

    With my hardware, I don't think I could play this game on my linux box. 486 w/cirrus logic 1meg chip. No fancy 3b voodoo whatever. But when it comes out, I'm buying it and giving it a try. Support all shrink-wrapped Linux apps that come out, I guess. This is good news. Vote w/ your wallet and then let the developers SEE that there is a market. Just my undervalued $0.02 American.

  33. HAPPYPENGUIN.ORG HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!! by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by antivert:

    happypenguin.org. It's alluring, in a very strange way. Why didn't I think of it? ;)

  34. Hmm... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Scott Francis[Mechaman]:

    On one hand, the environment looks pretty cheezy. However, they mention they were embarassed by their engine test, and the AVI apparently dates back to May, so it's possible they've done some updates.
    What seems more likely to me is that it was just a test arena, with some rocks to show off rendering and an enclosed arena to keep the CPU time down. The ships themselves(and the cockpit views) looked pretty nifty, and I swear I caught a hint of Macross Missile Mania/FreeSpace Hornet Swarm Missile -ish weaponry. :)
    If they switch it to a deep-space environment a 'la Descent: FreeSpace, I'd be highly interested. God knows there's much more decent game search/chat software than Parallax Online...

    The other thing that's interesting is their promise to support a lot of 3D accels--including the i740. Is it going to work under Linux with no external support? Did they license something from Intel? Will it be an X game? 'Coz I don't want to cough up a few hundred to XiG for a hardware-support OpenGL server after enduring the minor but highly annoying nits in Accel-X.

  35. Macross sim by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Scott Francis[Mechaman]:

    There's also a Macross TC going on for Shogo: Mobile Armor Division, as well. http://www.planetshogo.com/macross

  36. FreeBSD? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Although FreeBSD has linux emulation it isn't perfect. Therefore I find it nessicary to ask if this supports FreeBSD.

    Accually I'd like to display it on my sun3 xterminal (running on freeBSD) so I can get a net game going but that might be asking too much.

  37. Abuse by Danse · · Score: 1

    Actually, BFRIS is supposed to be the first shrink-wrapped playable-out-of-the-box Linux game. With Abuse, you had to download a Linux executable I believe. That it happens to also run on Win95 and NT just helps them make some decent money on it. I hope they do really well.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  38. System Requirements? by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 1

    They don't mention anywhere what the system requirements are. I'll wait to play the demo to see if I like it, but if it's a good game and compatible with my system, I'd love bothering the local software shops to get it in.


    --Phil (ATI 3D Rage--is that supported by any 3D libraries?)

    --
    355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
  39. gone gold? by bobz · · Score: 1

    They say "gone gold" when they cut the master CD that gets shipped to the duplicators because the CD itself is gold-colored.
    --
    The Linux Game Tome

  40. scores.. what the heck? (Score: 666) by dylan_- · · Score: 1


    Slashdot is actually a competition. You get extra points for confusing your discussion opponent, spotting a troll, or getting the first comment to a particular article.

    dylan_-


    --

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  41. Abuse by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    The shrink-wrap version of DOS Abuse was 2.0.0.
    However, when that came out, the linux
    version was, and stayed to be, 1.1.0, and was not
    compatible with 2.0.0 retail data (I guess). After a loooooong time, when the
    source code was published, we got Abuse/L 2.0.0 that worked just perfectly.
    Well, I guess that is it.

  42. Optimised for 2.2.x! by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 1

    Very nice!

    Take a hint Corel!

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  43. I'm afraid not out of the box... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    There's little to nothing that says that they can't be making a native FreeBSD version (everything they need, save maybe the enhanced joystick drivers, are there)- they just didn't see a need for it (smaller market share?). I suggest that you talk to them directly about the prospects thereof.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  44. This game looks *horrible* by mavpion · · Score: 1
    I see so many positive comments about the game, but from the screenshots I saw, this game will be crud. It looks like a bunch of textured spheres and some dumb patterns for the wall. The story line was about standard for action games, but the engine itself looked awful.

    Also, did you notice that the same guy who did the graphics for the game did them for the site? The graphics on the site were generated by script-fu's that come bundled with the Gimp. In my opinion, that shows a distinct lack of creativity; besides I always thought that the super-nova thing looked ugly.

    Anyways, I'm not buying a game that looks so awful, even if it has Linux support. We should not buy games just because they're made for Linux; why should we be any less demanding than the Windows game world? Linux stands for quality, not "I'll use it because it's Free no matter how much it sucks." (and yes, I know that this game isn't Free)
    --Eric Guenterberg

    To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first, and call whatever you hit the target"
  45. ATI IS LINUX-HOSTILE by ewhac · · Score: 1

    Schmucks.

    Don't they realize that about half of all Quake servers run on Linux? If you're a Quake server admin, do you want to crash back into Windoze just to check out the latest version of Capture The Flag/Team Fortress/Rocket Arena/Holy Wars/etc?

    Everyone start buying Matrox, NVidia, 3Dfx, and/or (gack!) S3 cards. Slowly, inexorably, ATI will figure out they're losing sales and change their tune.

    Schwab

  46. Gotta like these guys by bonehead · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that on the "Runs under" line, they list Linux _first_, before the various Windows flavors? Very cool.

    I'll definitely be buying a copy. I'd even buy one if I had no intention of playing it. Hell, I once chose a particular brand of cd-rom drive just 'cuz they listed linux under the supported operating systems, even though I knew full well that any drive on the shelf would work.

  47. I don't understand by rhinoX · · Score: 1

    The fact that it's slow as shit without one.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
  48. I'm buying a copy! by doomy · · Score: 1

    Now here you have some real programers.. unlike those other companies which promised linux games over 2-3 years ago.. and then just fade away..

    BTW, we managed to /. their severs so much that they removed the avi file and put a note about /. there :) nice.

    BTW, when you guys get the demo version out.. please put the linux version out simultaionously.. that would really rock for linux ppl.

    I'm going to hunt for this game at my local game store soon..!

    Enjoy!

    PS: q3 arena looks damn fine.
    --

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
  49. BFRIS? by scrytch · · Score: 1

    With a name like that, I'm guessing these guys don't have a marketing department...

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  50. ATI IS LINUX-HOSTILE by SolRHadden · · Score: 1

    Yeah, perhaps in the 3D realm. Who wants ATI 3D anyway, is it that great compared to 3dFX?

    A good reason to get an ATI card however, is the 2D support... go take a look at the XFree86 support for various ATI cards. Pretty big list.

  51. Woo Hoo by NaTaS777 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to get this game. It looks pretty good. And its in OpenGL! Im glad people are starting to notice that there are other os'es besdides winblows :)
    NaTaS

    --
    Natas of
    -=Pedophagia=-
    http://www.mp3.com/pedophagia
    Also Admin of
    http://loki.linuxgames.com
  52. ABSOLUTE PIECE OF CRAP by NaTaS777 · · Score: 1

    Ok yeah its not open source...which I rather have...but that dosen't mean its crap. So I guess Quake2 and any other awesome game in the world is crap to you. Its people like you that make me sick. I love linux and I love watching it grow. I want a OS with games, and ontop of that be very stable. If we don't allow, or we bash companies that make games in Linux but don't release the source...then we will never see some advantages that Winblows has. I do not run Windows cause I think its crap. But this kinda thing makes me happy cause now I really have no reason to install Windows. Just go away and if you think its crap. Why not make the fuxing game yourself and make it open source. If you do make a game this good and its open soure....then I will agree with you. But I have a feeling that you can't program anyway and you are just jealous!

    NaTaS

    --
    Natas of
    -=Pedophagia=-
    http://www.mp3.com/pedophagia
    Also Admin of
    http://loki.linuxgames.com
  53. I don't understand by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 1

    That is true. I once tried out glquake using winnt's software opengl. It did run, but 0.5 frames a second wasn't acceptable for a game. I expect it is a similar problem with this game and Q3

  54. Where Can I get it by juels · · Score: 1

    I want games for Linux, but are not knowledgable
    of where to buy them. On the net?

    /Juels

  55. Where Can I get it by Quickening · · Score: 1

    Pacific HiTech has a Linux Games CD in multiple volumes (they release a new one every few months) Available from walnut creek oc.

    --
    tcboo
  56. hope it's a lot better than the beta by Quickening · · Score: 1

    I tried the game around 12/97 and it was unplayable. bummer.

    --
    tcboo
  57. I'm buying a copy! by thor-nm · · Score: 1
    Sorry about that, but my backbone was on fire. :)

    I'd never encountered slashdot traffic about one of my customers before.

    (I'm aegistech's ISP)

  58. Why didn't somebody TELL ME ABOUT THIS by Dr.Claw · · Score: 1

    Now I have a use for that old joystick I've got behind my desk! I've always liked sims and it's been too long since I played one.
    On a side note they DEFINITELY USED GIMP, I mean they used the supernova and that scriptfu font in the BG. These guys are cool.
    HOPE FOR THE WORLD!!!

  59. When are these games going to come out for the PPC by Badfish · · Score: 1

    I want some shrinkwrapped games for my PPC linux box

  60. Abuse by adampr · · Score: 1

    I thought Abuse was the first shrink wrapped Linux game. Anyone?

    Oh and about Open Source and games, they don't mix! The only part of games that should be open
    source is their game engines, and rendering engines.

    --
    - No one ever got fired for choosing Linux
  61. ATI will never lose sales by Ravi+Swamy · · Score: 1

    1. Carmack was praising Apple's adoption of OpenGL more than the ATI Rage 128 which is also available for PC's in an AGP2X version rather than PCI66.

    2. The G3's still have PCI slots and Darryl Straus (sp?) was commenting about porting Glide to Linux/PPC so you could put a Voodoo2 in there.

    3. 3Dfx's Voodoo3 will be released exclusively by themselves. S3 is a competitor and makes the Savage3D chip. 3Dfx recently bought STB which makes finished boards utilizing 3Dfx and other chips from vendors such as nVidia.

  62. ATI IS LINUX-HOSTILE by Ravi+Swamy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately most of the 3D card makers do not give out specs on the 3D part of their cards except under NDA. Matrox G[12]00 cards are supported for 2D under XFree86 but no Mesa support. Same for nVidia RivaTNTs.

    I hope some of the companies release 3D specs soon, there *is* a market, I just bought a Voodoo2 solely for Linux Quake II.

  63. Linux game...so what? by Woo · · Score: 1

    Actually that isn't entirely true. There IS a network sever that does run on Linux, but we wanted to support the Linux USER. The game was developed to run under Linux. We had to port it to windows just because that market is so big. The thing would already have been out if it wasn't for the windows port. The process would have been much less painful if it wasn't for the windows side.

    Fred