Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.2.2 Released

Dave Miller, the ultracool hacker who does (definitely) work at Red Hat, wrote in to let us know Linux 2.2.2 has been released. A summary of changes should appear on Cutting Edge Linux shortly. This new kernel should fix the recent autofs bug (fixed in ac7). Update: 02/22 11:35 by J :Dave Whitinger, the guy behind the fabulous Linux Today site, wrote in with the linux-kernel-announce(ment). Update: 02/24 03:13 by CT : Dave Miller does work at Red Hat.

116 comments

  1. but my uptime.... *sniff* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to invent a way to upgrade kernels without having to reboot, then linux would be perfect.

  2. Problems with 2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compiled 2.2.0. Sound is gone. APM no longer turns off the computer on shut down. Does anybody know if that's fixed in 2.2.2? I shure hope so because 2.2 is way faster then 2.0.36 on my system...

    (I have genuine SB16, Asus TX97e board.)

  3. die-bugs-die dept. and the Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reminded of Sideshow Bob's parole hearing. When his tatoo "Die Bart Die" is questioned, he explains that it's German: "Die Bart Die." The parole board concludes that anyone who knows German can't be all bad, and they let him out (and he goes on to attempt again to do in Bart).

    Let's hope that the kernel developers have more success than Sideshow Bob! :-)

    Ok, back on topic now.

  4. 2.2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So 2.2.2 was released on 2-22, is this ironic or what?

  5. Fringe features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Anyone know if things like the new RAID
    code and the working ISDN code are going to
    be integrated into the 2.2 series of kernels?


    Or will we be looking at 2.2.x + patches until
    some point in 2.3 (or Goddess forbid, 2.4?)

  6. list of updated files on Linux Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Today has a list of updated files for 2.2.2 here.

  7. It's about damn time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My swap partition was getting bored. It was begging for a kernel compile.

  8. David Miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... when did David Miller start working for Redhat? I thought he was working for Cobalt Micro.

  9. Problems with 2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sound was fixed in 2.2.1...it broke for me too..(thats part of why it was a "brown paper bag" release)..

  10. First... to compile :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I win

  11. Problems with 2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APM and power-off on shutdown is a compile time option, at least in the 2.0 series. I haven't yet compiled my first 2.2, but I'd assume that it is similar- check the options.
    ~luge

  12. Compile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had the same problem when I tried from the patch... I got the full source and it compiled fine.

  13. Compile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i downloaded the patch, the kernel compiled fine but then i got a error during make_modules.
    then i downloaded the full source and got an error in loopback.o during make bzImage...

  14. 2.2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I suggest you look up the word "Damnit". You won't find it anywhere (hint, replace the second 'n' with another 'm').

  15. Changing kernels during runtime? Whoa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's actually really easy if you have a multiprocessor system. Just boot it on the spare CPU, then *switch*. Duhh!

  16. What's up with Quake II? (It still crashes 2.2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I had the same problem. When I deleted Quake ][, it went away.

  17. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... hey I don't know what you are talking about. QII runs great for me, I have actually fewer problems - but I am using a vanilla SB AWE32 and 3dfx Voodoo -- hmm, maybe it could be something other than the kernel?

  18. Please take pity on me and my IPchains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't seem to get the correct syntax for ipchains to work and since my firewall is important, that leaves me at 2.0.36-3 for now. Can anyone please translate this into an IPchains sytax. Btw, I *have* read man ipchains and still got nowhere.
    /sbin/ipfwadm -I -i reject -P all -D myhostname.com -S 152.163.210.0/24

    Thanks guys...

    /me awaits the RTFM comments. =)

  19. Should I complile a new kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm running 2.2.1 now and I'm not sure if I should get 2.2.2.

    Things work pretty well with 2.2.1, for the most part. But since I upgraded from 2.0.36, my balls really started to itch a lot. Does 2.2.2 fix that?

  20. Red Hat & 2.2.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone noticed that when you upgrade to 2.2 using Red Hat that in /var/log/messages the "LOGIN:" parts seem all screwed up?

  21. A way to modify the reported uptime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it has to be in one of the internal structures somewhere... If you are desperate, do a 'tickadj 11000' and let it sit for a while. Then, set it back to 10000 and set the date back to the right time. I think that should work, but pretty slowly.

  22. Should I complile a new kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I think I know what the problem is. The older kernels were small enough that you could install them directly onto your "floppy." The 2.2.x series are a lot bigger and a "floppy" just won't cut it anymore. Use your imagination and I'm sure you'll come up with a solution.


    Regards,
    President William Jefferson Clinton

  23. Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's always nice to here wisdom earned through experience. Any other things we should know?

  24. Should I complile a new kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That's the problem with you linux lusers.... always trying to have sex with your computer.

  25. RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just kidding.

  26. Compile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problems here, full source.

  27. What's up with Quake II? (It still crashes 2.2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quake (typically) runs with root access, and the ability to write to /dev/mem. So it can take down the system by stomping on the kernel (among other things)

  28. Should I complile a new kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Highball!!!

  29. socket filtering broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like yet again development features are
    being integrated into the ``stable'' branch,
    just like with 2.0 when someone completely
    replaced the ``stable'' aic7xxx driver with a copy of the
    2.1 dev version and thus broke AHA2940 support
    for a bunch of older boards.

    when will this pathetically impatient
    childish behavior end?

  30. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you thank you thank you and thank you =)
    2.2.2 here i come

  31. 2.2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, on the other side of the world (New Zealand), it's the 23rd.

    The internet doesn't revolve around the US.

  32. Please take pity on me and my IPchains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently there's also a ipfwadm wrapper-type thingie for ipchains :)

    handy for admins who couldn't be bothered modifying all their ipfwadm rules on multiple boxes, etc...

    I dunno why a wrapper would be used though, i'd think it better to write a conversion script...

    AndyM

  33. alsa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey there,

    I know this has been asked before, but has there been any talk of dropping oss for alsa? does alsa need to improve/ stabilise/ get past the 1.oh magic number?

    cheers

    andym

  34. no Problem with 2.2.2 an quake 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hm , must be something other .

    i have sb64 + 3dfx or software ,

    just works fine , even with sound


    chris

  35. Regular QuakeWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QuakeWorld locks up on me...both regular, and GL
    verison...ever since I went to 2.2 it's done this.
    I can't figure it out no matter what I do. :~(
    (But hey, I get more work done. Maybe it's a kernel
    feature. :))

  36. Please take pity on me and my IPchains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops, seems I made an error. the first "-s" should of course be "-d" as in destination. (and host should be your host ip adress)

  37. What's up with Quake II? (It still crashes 2.2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this problem too..

    Dunno how or why, but switching to the libc5 version of quake/Quake2 fixed it. (It's a glibc system.. RedHat)

    *shrug*

  38. DOS Attack effecting all CURRENT & upcoming kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have discovered a flaw in the actual USER BASE of linux. If I was to release a new kernel, all linux users will be forced to reboot.. There is NO work around.

  39. RE: Actually... (journaling is coming) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you bum around the ask slashdot features there is a question about really large FS's. There are links in the "reply's" to sites about JFS stuff. There are BETA releases as I've heard.

    I myself do not know very much about the matter, but I read about it there

    Anonymous Hero

  40. DOS Attack effecting all CURRENT & upcoming kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cut down on LSD will ya

  41. alsa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ta dude, i _did_ check out their homepage, but was just wondering if anyone had heard any _talk_ of the possibility of using alsa sometime in the not-too-distant future...

    :)

    cheers andym

  42. 2.2.1 performance problem fixed ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Has someone noticed a virtual memory system performance problem ? Because here I have a 2.2.1 with an uptime of 15 days, and the system trashed to death when running mostly a 25MB netscape and a 20MB python script in 64 MB of RAM (and low RSS). The stranger thing is that when I ran a small program designed to fill 50MB of memory, the resident memory for the netscape and python process went down to 3 MB, while the program could only get about 15 MB resident: the system is acting like it has only 16-32 MB of RAM

    Could this be a consequence of not upgrading all the advertised programs/libraries ?

    Or Is this a feature of 2.2.x, limiting RSS of processes at the expense of awful trash - leading to some kind priority inversion ?

    And would the "VFS updates" advertised for 2.2.2 fix that ?

  43. 2.0.36 -> 2.2.x - is it worth the trouble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry.. i ment libc should form NO problem.

  44. Here's what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime a new kernel is released, I recompile my current kernel (1.2.23) that way, I feel like I'm upgrading but there aren't any nasty suprises. I don't even have to run lilo or reboot!

  45. The CONFIG_FILTER patch (was: Compile?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a problem in 2.2.2-pre5 and apparently the fix never made it back to Linus:

    See:

    http://www.linuxhq.com/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_ 9902_03/msg00917.html

    for the patch.

  46. in wrong German... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..it would be "the beard, the", but its the wrong gender for beard, and for Bart either - both are male in German, whereas the "die" article is the female article.

  47. Fold over once, staple twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Count on geeks to be anal-retentive! :-)

    Of course, it was a joke. It wasn't intended by Sideshow Bob (or me) to be good German. It was intended by Sideshow to sucker Springfield loons.

    Why are you quibbling over the use of German in a joke? Sheesh.

  48. you need to use talcom powder not recompile!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talcom powder will take the itch away, but it is very addicting and i dont know if women like a mouthful of talcom.

  49. I sometimes wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    if some people recompile a kernel everytime an update is issued. =]


    Yep. Even if I don't need it I do. Unless it's on a box that many people are using or that is at a remote site.


    By the way, for the people that don't know how to install a patch:


    bunzip2 -c patch-2.2.2.bz2 | patch -p0


    That's assuming your current directory is /usr/src and your kernel directory is /usr/src/linux. Try it sometime--it saves bandwidth.


    KN

  50. NTFS is a journaling file system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it is

  51. Waaaait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a serious bug, the files uploaded were bad...they cause massive ext2 file system corruption. The updated 2.2 is there for download ...hehe, just kiddin...but this is exactly why I wait 2 days :)

  52. USB definetly is missing, at least infra is there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed

  53. Actually... (journaling is coming) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its one which journalist can store large bs stories upon.

    No its on that tracks deletions, file movements, etc. So you can recover in the event of a crash.

    I personally thing they slow the system down and are useless for power use, but for servers I suppose its good.

  54. Yup, and ms stole it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and NT stole the technology from os2 (ibm) blatently (and stole win95 look from it too)...he always wanted their os and tricked them into a tech share agreement, they shared, he took all. Just look at the fs under an editor..its got hpfs written all over it, LITERALLY :).

    sco has journaling too, but they wrote theirs

  55. Actually you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can upgrade the kernel without rebooting...you just can use the new version till you reboot. You can still say, yes I have 2.2 installed.

  56. Ohhh Ahhh, its a sound patch...my sound works fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it seem people around here update for no reason? Get the patch...skim it, if its not pertinent to you...don't install it...I think everyone wants the latest hotest kernel.

    I am about ready for linux to start releasing patches just a services packs period...then people will understand
    Major release 2.2
    Patch level .0 .1 .2

    Oh WOW they released a patch.

  57. And you get an error asking for the file :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually its
    get it and try this (assuming you copied the patch
    to /usr/src/linux...if not path it)

    if its a bz2 file
    cd /usr/src/linux; bunzip2 -c patch-2.2.2.bz2|patch -p1

    if its a gz file
    cd /usr/src/linux;
    gzip -d -c patch-2.2.2.gz|patch -p1


    note the -p1 as apposed to -p0

  58. Compile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used the patch, no errors.

  59. scsi, yea that cost me money :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember that one! And my freakin wide devices still worked, as did the first external device (which is a high terminated narrow chain), but my hp 4 scanner didn't. I got a refurbed 4c to replace my 4p (which its better) but now I got two freakin scanners...spare parts I suppose :).

  60. Sound in 2.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a regular (not PnP) SB16 and had the same problem with 2.2.1. Then I just recompiled it with sound in the kernel rather than as a module. Works great. I'll see about 2.2.2 when I get home this evening...

  61. OK, let's figure this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i had the same problem when i went from 2.0.36
    to 2.2.x .. i determined that the problem was OSS.. so now when i run quake2, it unloads OSS, and loads the Kernel sound modules, when quake2 exits, it reloads OSS.. this works fine for me, no more lock ups..

  62. 2.2.2 and mp3s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I delete the line SKIN from ~/.x11amp/.config
    I'm using binary 0.7 x11amp and 2.2.2 kernel, i can live without the skins

  63. Really cool stuff by chkdsk · · Score: 1

    Well, it's 2/22 and kernel 2.2.2 is out. It makes me wonder if anyone planned this. Interesting, eh?

    (Maybe we'll get 2.2.3 tomorrow. *grin*)

  64. :( by Matrix · · Score: 1

    Too bad that I still have problems with 2.2.2 and sound. The Ultrasound project won't compile on 2.2 and OSS sounds VERY staticky on one channel .. Would anyone by any chance know why OSS would be staticky in one channel but the Ultrasound project sounds fine in both?

  65. 2.2.2 by John+Campbell · · Score: 1

    Wow... it's like a Little Caesar's commercial... "twotwotwo!"

  66. Journaling is... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

    a way to ensure integrity of a filesystem in case of powerdown or other calamity.

    When a file is written, an entry is first made to the journal indicating what was to be written, then an attempt is made at writing to the filesystem, if the write was successful then the journal entry is removed or marked done else the write can be attempted again or rolled back.

    In the case of an error in the filesystem, the journal can be used to bring it back into sane state.

    Think of journaling as a form of transaction processing for a filesystem. This is my understanding of the process.

    NTFS is a journaling filesystem with advanced Access Control Lists. It's the best and only real thing that NT has going for it; too bad the rest of the OS has so many problems. When NTFS read/write is available for Linux then we can say that Linux is a better NT than NT? --- Note play on words... :)

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  67. Woo Hoo!!! by gavinhall · · Score: 0

    Posted by OGL:

    Yay!

    -W.W.

  68. Clean Mirror here by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by a VALUED MEMBER of the space m:

    ftp://pulsar.midsouth.rr.com/pu b/linux-2.2.2.tar.gz

  69. First... to compile :) by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by chiem:

    Actually, I won:

    chiem@blowfish:~[1]$ uptime
    1:23am up 2:49, 3 users, load average: 0.11, 0.14, 0.07

    Which means I had it done at ~10:33 pm on the 22nd.

    --k

  70. Dave Miller by Threed · · Score: 1

    Is that the same Dave Miller that used to run a BBS on an Apple //gs, or am I suffering from Small World Syndrome?

    --Threed

  71. 2.2.2 by robin · · Score: 1
    [...] Some time has to be fixed as the standard, after all.

    Typically, UTC (Universal Coordinated Time, a very close approximation to GMT) is taken as the standard time. I gather astronomers prefer sidereal time, possibly even in America. HTH.

    Oh yeah, this conversion table might come in handy some time.


    --
    W.A.S.T.E.
    --
    W.A.S.T.E.
  72. Probably not by kashani · · Score: 1

    Actually Linux users should change their underwear everytime they recompile the kernel.
    Windows users should change them everytime they reboot.

    heh heh
    Kashani

    --
    - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
  73. Should I complile a new kernel? by Raj+'nopzor'+Dutt · · Score: 1

    Yes, it does. Not only that but it'll make you richer and take away that sick personality streak.

  74. anybody's got this nasty bug? by cremat · · Score: 1

    when loading the module aha152x:

    bug: kernel timer added twice at c021a72d (of course, that last "thing" changes any time I try to load the module)

  75. Compiles on Alpha by Robert+Bowles · · Score: 1

    Unlike 2.2.2-pre5, it builds on Alpha(164LX, at least).
    I'm rebooting now to see if it works...

    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
  76. Fatally Flawed Concept (was: DOS Attack...) by Robert+Bowles · · Score: 1
    For the following reasons (to start)
    1. Long-time users of linux
      1. Many who follow the "bleeding-edge" have multiple machines.
      2. The majority don't follow the "bleeding edge" anyway.
    2. Newbies (apply rule 1.2 above)
    3. No-one is going to accept your patches.
    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
  77. When 2.3? by slothbait · · Score: 1

    Anyone know when they are starting the 2.3 tree? I'm quite content with my shiny new 2.2 kernel (my /dev/sound finally works!), but I'd also like to see what they've got in the works for the future. Have they begun a tentative feature list for 2.3?

    --Lenny

  78. Actually... by slothbait · · Score: 1

    A journalling filesystem would be nice, although that will likely be saved until Linux 3.0 . ext2fs seems pretty decent, though I know little about the topic. Hmmm...wonder where I could find some good literature on filesystems (theory and comparisons)?

    --Lenny

  79. Why not? by BigD42 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't go out of my way to to do it, but besides that, why the hell not? I'm not about to bring down my router box to upgrade the kernel (it still runs 2.0.36) until I'm sure the upgrade would be without serious complications. (I've heard about troubles w/ ipchains and ipamasq) But for my personal box, I figure any update to the stable kernel, especially in the early stages is a pretty good idea

    --
    --- Linux... a college project gone horribly right
  80. Anyone know the Realplayer workaround under 2.2.x? by aheitner · · Score: 1

    Alan Cox mentions on www.linux.org.uk that realplayer is not cool with the new sound stuff or something. In any case it doesn't work quite right. He says some people already have a workaround. I couldn't find where this was discussed -- does anybody know what the workaround is? Or do I have to go browse the kernel mailing list archives...

  81. Compile? by LunaticLeo · · Score: 1

    Turn off "Socket Filtering" in your configuration.
    Or CONFIG_FILTER in your .config file.

    This will #ifdef out the socket filtering code,
    which is the culprit. I'm gonna see if my feeble
    C/kernel skills can do anything about it
    tommorrow. But I am sure it'll be fixed before
    I wake up.

    --
    -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
  82. I sometimes wonder by Puff · · Score: 1

    I have been recently. (for 2.2)

  83. Really cool stuff by Puff · · Score: 1

    Thats _really_ cool.

  84. Changing kernels during runtime? Whoa. by kondrag · · Score: 1

    Provided of course that you have enough memory to avoid swapping... NT is very swapaholic with less than 64MB.

    Oink! Oink!

  85. 2.2.2 by Andrew+Lockhart · · Score: 1

    "Uncanny" would be more appropriate.

  86. Should I complile a new kernel? by nicedream · · Score: 1

    Yes, but be sure to include penicillin.h.

    Brian

  87. Actually... by Darchmare · · Score: 1

    I believe Dominic Giampalo (the guy behind BFS, the file system underlying the BeOS) has written a book by the name of "Practical File System Design with the Be File System". Despite the name, my understanding (note: I haven't read the book) is that it's a bit more generic than it sounds...

    - Darchmare
    - Axis Mutatis, http://www.axismutatis.net

    --

    - Jeff
  88. (Same Here) What's up with Quake II? by Spoke · · Score: 1

    Quake 2 works intermittently for me. It seems to work better if my sound modules aren't loaded yet. If the sound modules are loaded, and I try to start up Quake 2, I get nothing. It starts to load, and switches video modes, but then freezes. If I kill quake2 from a telnet session, things go back to normal, but attempting to kill it from the machine itself is nearly impossible because you can't do anything but SysRq commands. And those don't always bring the machine back into a usable state. Check here for information on my setup.

  89. Anyone know the Realplayer workaround under 2.2.x? by rpete · · Score: 1
  90. What's up with Quake II? (It still crashes 2.2) by Turnbull · · Score: 1

    I just booted up my new 2.2.2 kernel and tried Quake II and it froze up the whole system, just like 2.2.1. what's up with this? I remember reading /. comments about this when 2.2.0 was released, but I guess either the issue hasn't been addressed, or it's just considered a serious bug in quake....

  91. OK, let's figure this out by Turnbull · · Score: 1

    It's me again. I just realized that I should have mentioned what kind of system I have.

    Hardware: generic ET6000 / 2.25 MB; SB AWE64 PnP.

    Software: linux 2.2.2; glibc 2.0.7; svgalib 1.3.1; Quake 2 v. 3.19 (glibc).

    Quake 2 works fine with Linux 2.0.33, but freezes in 2.2.[12], leaving the system unusable so I have to reboot.

    Based on the comments so far, it sounds like this has to do with sound or glibc or both.

    If anyone else wants to share his experience, I'd appreciate it.

  92. Actually... (journaling is coming) by Tharsis · · Score: 1

    hmm... what is a journaling FS?

  93. I sometimes wonder by calx · · Score: 1

    if some people recompile a kernel everytime an update is issued. =]

  94. but my uptime.... *sniff* by Stephen+Pitts · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure Hurd can do this, the platform-independent MkLinux part can be restarted without taking down the whole Mach system. But, is the uptime stored by MkLinux or Mach?

    --
    Stephen Pitts

  95. Problems with 2.2 by Bubba · · Score: 1

    Dunno about the sound...But I had the same problem with APM (running redhat 5.2). Actually its not a kernel problem, but its an inittab thing. Edit /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt. Go to the last line and change it from:
    "eval $command -d"
    to
    "eval $command -d -p"

    This fixed my APM problem.

    Hope this helps...

    -Bubba

  96. Sound in 2.2.1 by woggo · · Score: 1

    I'm running a SB16 PnP which worked fine under 2.0.36, but which doesn't work under 2.2.1. I get the fabled "device or resource busy" when initializing the sb module (it's choking on the DMA address). Has anyone had any luck with a similar setup? Is this fixed in 2.2?

    wog

  97. Sound in 2.2.1 by woggo · · Score: 1

    sndconfig is broken in 2.2.x for SB cards because the module expects different arguments than it did in 2.0.x

    I have already run isapnp and modprobe -- isapnp works, but modprobe fails with "device or resource busy".


    wog

  98. First... to compile :) by Stardate · · Score: 0

    As soon as I get it...

    --
    "... I declare our city to be a free and independent state to be named Tri-Insula!" --Fernando Wood, Mayor of NYC 1861
  99. Changing kernels during runtime? Whoa. by jerodd · · Score: 1
    That's a nice idea, but will be difficult without an extremely modular kernel. What would be interesting is the ability to swap in and out modules that are being used; i.e. upgrade to a new (for example) scsi.o or e2fs.o. Remember, a modular kernel (like Mach) is slower than a monolithic one (compare OS/2 Version 4 to Version 3; compare Windows NT to 9[58]; compare Linux to AIX). I have nothing against Mach (or Hurd), but they do compromise performance.

    I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a way to create memmgr.o and then change that while the system was running. OK, so I would be impressed.

    Cheers,
    Joshua. (Geez, it's late.)

    --
    --jon. Postel is dead. May we all mourn his, and our, loss.
  100. 2.2.2 and mp3s by red_one · · Score: 1

    I can't get any mp3s to play correctly through 2.2.2.

    cd-audio works fine, quake audio plays fine, but the mp3s loop the first 0.5s of the mp3.
    both x11amp and mpg123 fail.
    reboot into 2.2.1, mp3s work fine.
    What's up with this?

  101. Because OSS stinks. by SuperDee · · Score: 1

    Enough said... I would recommend ALSA... I had similar problems... Under OSS/Free, I could not get it to play sound on my GUS PnP without the thing spewing out tons and tons of DMA/IRQ errors, even though my DMA/IRQs were okay. IMHO, OSS/Free is what I would call crippleware, masquerading as open source... ALSA rules.

  102. 2.2.2 and mp3s by gavare · · Score: 1

    For me, the 2.2.2 kernel was up for maybe 5 hours before it hung: I used mpg123 to play some mp3's (mpg123 has worked with 2.0.x, 2.1.x, and 2.2.1). When the last mp3 was finnished, there was some debug information, but no shell prompt. The Alt-SysRq-stuff didn't quite work: I usually do S-U-B (Sync-Umount-Boot) in situations like this, but this time the 'S' only printed out more debug-information, the 'U' didn't do anything (I tried it three times). The 'B' rebooted as expected though (and it spent 25 minutes fixing the disks).

    I have a Cyrix CPU. I've had problems with the 2.2.1 kernel too (random hangs and reboots). Does this have to do with Cyrix maybe? I've read articles about some undocumented 'hang-cyrix-opcodes', but why would any program include anything like that?

    Gavare
    (Let's just hope I can post this before the system hangs again ;)

  103. I will beat you to it..... by X-Type · · Score: 1

    I will beat you to it and be the first to compile.


    "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." - Emerson

    --
    010110000010110101010100011110010111000001100101
  104. What? by X-Type · · Score: 1

    I do not understand.

    --
    010110000010110101010100011110010111000001100101
  105. 2.0.36 -> 2.2.x - is it worth the trouble? by brother_b · · Score: 1

    I'm still using a libc5 system with kernel 2.0.36 (on an i486). Is it really worth the effort to try the move to 2.2.x? I'm pretty happy with the state of the system now, and unless there's some really super-duper reason to do the upgrade boogie (like security problems) I generally leave things be.

    --

  106. Please take pity on me and my IPchains. by wakko · · Score: 1
    If you are on 2.0 and are leary about using ipchains, try: http://www.animx.eu.org/linux/ipfw It's a simple perl script I wrote. I didn't like the ipfwadm command too well, so I wrote this. It's pretty basic (it'll only do what ipfwadm -l or whatever it is can list. At the time I didn't know about the more verbose listing of rules that ipfwadm had). This script can build a rules file from your current rules (just run the file that it outputs. it sets it as executable) to setup the rules with the new kernel. It does rely on the files in /proc to work. It can also auto detect which program it needs to run by looking at what files are found in /proc.

    I would love to hear if it helps anyone, it's been pretty private (Never found a good place to post it), but I release it under GNU GPL! If anyone makes a change, I'd love to hear about it as well.

    mail me.

    --
    Lab test show that use of micro$oft causes deadly cancer in lab animals.
  107. OK, let's figure this out by wakko · · Score: 1

    I think I figured out what it was. I noticed quake2 not working as well, strace told me it was stopping on a read.. TURNS OUT it's the friggin mouse.. Just move the mouse and it works. (for me atleast)

    --
    Lab test show that use of micro$oft causes deadly cancer in lab animals.
  108. Mr. Gates and 640KB by Jeld · · Score: 1

    > "640k ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates

    AFAIK Gates never said this. This sentence was uttered by some chairman of IBM who was responsible for hardware limit of 640 KB of directly adressable memory. Again, AFAIK these words were said when he was asked if he thinks 640k limit will have the same fate as 64k limit did. As we all know 640k limit got to the same place but much faster due to accelerated speed of technical progress.

    --

    Everybody Lies. But it doesn't matter since nobody listens.

  109. Compile? by Shadow+Knight · · Score: 1

    Compiles just fine on my Celeron-A... haven't rebooted yet to see if it actually works, but it compiles!

    later,
    Robbie

    --

  110. Compile? by Shadow+Knight · · Score: 1

    Nope, I got the patch and it compiled fine...

    Later,
    Robbie

    --

  111. Compile? by Shadow+Knight · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I am, at this point, running 2.2.2 on an Intel system. Compiled with no problems, and I got the patch. I even have loopback enabled... I don't know why it isn't working for you, sorry.

    Later,
    Robbie

    --

  112. Compile? by Saadiq · · Score: 1

    It compile for anyone else on an intel box? The object file 'loopback.o' isn't being very cooperative. Complains about "dereferencing pointer to incomplete type" in the header file sock.h.

  113. Compile? by Saadiq · · Score: 1

    I prior to 2.2.2 I had 2.2.1-ac6 so I unpatched the ac6 stuff and then applied the 2.2.2 patch. Tried to compile and got the loopback.o problem. Then got the full sources and tried to compile again. Same problem. *scratchin' my head* Any ideas?

  114. Luck with SB16PnP by Anomie-ous+Cow-ard · · Score: 1

    i'm running 2.2.2 right now and x11amp sounds just fine over my SB16PnP. It took a little work to get it that way, but once i got it set up in 2.2.0 it didn't give any more trouble. Here's how i did it, maybe this'll help.

    On advice from a HOWTO, i downloaded and compiled isapnptools-1.17. pnpdump --config gave the expected output, so i just redirected to isapnp.conf to save myself some work.

    Compiled the kernel with sound as a module. Ended up with adlib_card.o, opl3.o, sb.o, soundcore.o, sound.o, and uart401.o in /lib/modules.

    Finally, i put in a script to initilize the thing on boot.

    #! /bin/bash
    case "$1" in
    start)
    echo "Setting up sound card..."
    # Plug n Play config
    isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf
    # Install basic sound modules
    insmod soundcore
    insmod sound
    # init'ize uart thing, because sb needs it
    insmod uart401
    # Set up the actual sound card! Pulled numbers out of isapnp.conf
    insmod sb io=0x220 irq=9 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x300 type=6
    # Midi support. Note that this automatically loads opl3.o as well
    modprobe adlib_card io=0x388
    echo "Done."
    esac

    exit 0

    i'm not sure how many of those insmods could be done with modprobe, don't feel much like changing it because it works fine as-is for me.

    --

    --
    perl -e'$_=shift;die eval' '"$^X $0\047\$_=shift;die eval\047 \047$_\047"' at -e line 1.

  115. Red Hat & 2.2.x - shutdown problems by fredlwm · · Score: 1

    I rebooted my Linux box 2 times since i have upgraded to the 2.2.x series (2.2.0 to 2.2.1 and 2.2.1 to 2.2.2) but my root partition can't be unmounted. The log:
    Shutting down system loggers:
    syslogd klogd /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K70syslog: kill : (119) - no such pid
    This is very strange. I'm running syslogd and i didn't killed it. But it's not the major problem:
    Unmounting file systems
    umount: / : device is busy
    mount: / is busy
    Remounting remaining filesystems (if any) readonly
    mount: / is busy
    The system is halted - System halted... I don't want this device busy every time i have to reboot.

    --
    How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
  116. 2.2.1 performance problem fixed ? by fredlwm · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem using the 2.2.1 (uptime of 25 days). I ran a ps and +-15mb of my ram was eated by something. Today i rebooted and actually i'm using 20mb running X with the same apps when it used +- 38mb. I think that with an uptime of 25 days 27mb is normal, but not 38mb. It's a RedHat 5.1 with all the updates and the Changes required compiled all from scratch with gcc 2.7.2.3. I have 128mb of ram + 128 of swap.

    --
    How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html