3-D Memory May Revolutionize PC Data Storage
Lots and lots of people have turned us on to this story and this follow-up in The Register about a "three-dimensional memory system" that is supposed to pack up to "2300GB into a PC Card-sized device" and may cost as little as $30 to manufacture. Sounds great, but it's apparently still in the pre-vaporware stage of development so don't throw away your hard drives quite yet.
Rather amusing. And if you didn't read the follow up, you shall be admonished.
But those toilet-bowl brushes sure do sound cool. Can't wait to upgrade mine.
Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
Wow, can't wait for that, hell, 2.3 TB (approx) of storage for $35 works for me. Oh, and I am REALLY waiting on the Intel Downstream processor. hehehhe, yeah, maybe they can get it out almost as quickly as they can ship merced...naaa, I'll stick with my alpha. BTW, for all you people who usually don't read the article, this and the followup are going to be ones you might want to check out.
Reads like an anti-gravity press release.
The biggest problem there is right now in this field is moving from 2 to 3 dimensions. If someone were to come up with a method of moving waste heat out of the substrate and made the technology stackable, densities wouldn't be as much of a problem. There is some interesting optical reading of magnetic effects going on in some of the labs these days which should improve access times but this usually means that the 3rd dimension is needed for the optics (like heads over media). One thing that I think was played around with was vertical positioning with edge bonding as well as double sided dies but that never went very far in the 80s when I was involved (I was a wirebonder in a previous life, now it's all automated)
Think about those übergeeky Casio calculator thingies packin' a 100 megs (or was that migs? :D)
"I love titties"
Of course going 3d is obvious, but they don't really
give enough details other than 'magneto-optical' -
what, 3 lasers and a field reading/writing bits in a
cube of stuff? Maybe the next 'bubble memory' device?
(anyone old enough to remember those?) I know a MO
disk you have to buffer and rewrite a whole track just
to alter one bit. Maybe a data access rate of 100Mbps
but it takes 3 minutes to write? Who knows....
Chuck
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
I mean this sounds too good to be true. And last time I checked, when something sounds like that, it has a good chance of being just that. On the other hand I have heard of rumors of 3D storage for some time...
The question is, when will we have watches that act as personal HD's... If your within 5 ft of the computer, say... it could be automounted over an RF channel... "Quake. Never leave home without it."
More Caffeine. NOW
Not $30 it's 35 pounds(sorry i don't remember the ASCII code :-( )
Non gratis rodentus anus
Anything scientific in the "Mail on Sunday" should be taken with a large pinch of salt. It tends to be read by ladies (I use the word advisedly) with blue rinses and husbands named Geoffery. Said ladies usually have an abiding belief in the omniscience of Margaret Thatcher and the place of menials in the home.
Well, they have all the news - the problem is to know which of them are true... But they are certainly entertaining ;-)
Has it ever occurred to you that God might be a committee?
Has it ever occurred to you that God might be a committee?
--- Jubal Harshaw
Wait till they invent storage devices that work in the 4th dimention (time)! Just think:
"Professor invents 4 dimentional storage device. Coming to stores 20 years ago!"
SirSlud
(looking for more storage space for all his prOn)
"Old man yells at systemd"
Yeah! Finally I can store all my knowledge into my PDA and have my brain surgically removed to create space for my experimental neural-interfaced GSM modem ;)
...my 256-bit 64-processor wearable -- the one that's integrated into my leather jacket, with the wireless 100 Tbps Internet connection and the little plastic tiara of electrodes for direct neural I/O. (paging William Gibson, white courtesy telephone, please...)
"'Tis a consummation devoutly to be wish'd."
"How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
Looks a little like a Red Herring to me. Who was that guy who's invented 100 Gig harddrives that come in (badly retouched pictures of) pentium II cases? Doesn't want to reveal to much info until they have a patent, because you know, last time I checked, it was simple to whip up a new storage device from a few vague comments about physics ;)
Hey wait, I think I'll patent 3D storage devices right now!
Michael Gentili
- He's just some guy, you know?
Well, they've had holographic memory out for a while now, but it has high seek times. The data throughput is impressive though. (page at a time read/write). The only commercial use I have heard of was fingerprint id machines. The potential for storage in a small space was great tho.
penguinicide... when jumping out a window just won't do.
From http://www.cmruk.com/cmrkeele.html
'KEELE' ULTRA HIGH DENSITY MEMORY SYSTEM
A Quantum Jump in Memory Storage and Access
Professor Ted Williams at Keele University, Staffordshire, England has developed a patented solid state memory system with the capacity of 86 Giga Bytes per square centimetre of surface area. The system uses a magneto-optical system not dissimilar to that of CD-ROM, except that the system is fixed, solid state, and has a different operating approach.
The system has applications for computer and processor memory for credit cards and smart cards, and for high security bank notes, among many other uses.
In computer memory format, the system has a capacity per sq cm in excess of 86 Giga Bytes of re-writeable RAM data - this equates to a memory capacity of 3400 Giga Bytes(3.4 Tb) within the surface area of a credit card! Data access time is around 100 Mb/sec. A single unit with this capacity, but using the computer's processor, has a physical size of about 3 cm x 3 cm x 1.5 cms (high). An additional advantage over existing data storage systems is that only 20% of gross capacity needs to be allocated for error correction, which is significantly less than the 40% for hard disks and 30% for optical storage. Production costs are anticipated to be less than £30 for such a unit.
Patents have been granted for parts of the system, and patent applications have been filed for other aspects.
The invention will have a major impact on the computer industry, giving even small palmtop computers the capacity of a mainframe! The effect on other industries will be equally significant - for example, televisions could have built-in solid state video recorders, wristwatches could have vastly more power than today's PC Computers. Implications for the security of financial instruments credit cards and bank notes - will be profound, as the high data-density substrate used can be put onto virtually every surface.
well, replace 256-bit with 64, leather jacket with fabric mesh, 100Tbps with 100Mbps, and forget the direct neural I/O (I wish) and that's my thesis. I'm starting in september...mmmm, Beowulf cluster in my underwear, hee hee!
Michael Gentili
- He's just some guy, you know?
This reminded me of our old friends the American Computer Company who have been known to make similarly ambitious announcements.
Maybe CMR and ACC should collaborate on reverse engineering alien sanitation technology. If they're thousands of years ahead of us, they must have worked out how to clean a toilet by now.
Is it April 1st already?
You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
Maybe CMR and ACC should collaborate on reverse engineering alien sanitation technology. If they're thousands of years ahead of us, they must have worked out how to clean a toilet by now.
Assuming that aliens _had_ toilets to clean.....
Insert mind here.
C'mon guys. The Register is the Weekly World News of online journalism. Gimme a break already.
I do recall a small story about 5 years ago on a similar idea.
It sounds like it was a different approach, but some researchers had come up with an idea that could allow over a terabyte of storage on a 'translucent' cube using technology similar to CD ROMs. The data could be accessed by moving lasers to different angles and positions on the surface.
I'm guessing the research didn't pan out, because I haven't heard anything about it since then. But the principle of this story is the same as then: Packing data in three dimensions to allow much greater density.
I think speculation on price and/or specs is premature, since its possible existence is still in question. But I think this kind of technology is inevitable, somewhere down the road.
Posted by Nr9:
heh 100 Mbps is pretty slow
or is it that Win will need 2.3TB/CPU to boot..
While you might not enjoy the "tabloid-esque" style, the articles are usually one or more of the following:
a) Technically accurate
b) Interesting (did you read the stuff about Fab 30?)
c) Entertaining
d) Prescient (lots of pre-release info)
And after all, you don't have to read any of it...
This sig left unintentionally blank.
While you might not enjoy the "tabloid-esque" style, the articles are usually one or more of the following:
a) Technically accurate
b) Interesting (did you read the stuff about Fab 30?)
c) Entertaining
d) Prescient (lots of pre-release info)
And after all, you don't have to read any of it...
This sig left unintentionally blank.
OK, so one of the two links is a joke. Now all I have to do is figure out which one...
2 dashes and a space, or just 2 dashes?
Not to be overly overly serious, but dimensions don't have a particular order.
If I want to call time the first dimension, well there it is. X, Y, Z, and however many other dimensions we discover/invent will just have to wait their turn.
Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
sorry
This sig left unintentionally blank.
£35 != $35
:) Still, whatever the conversion rate is (I'm gonna take a random guess and say 2.5 dollars per pound, and that's prolly way off), $87.50 is a small price to pay for that ninja, if it ever comes to exist.
£35 > $35
that's why you always feel like you're getting screwed if you order albums from other countries.
Let's make a bet...
I'll bet you that if you were to approach these developers (read: venture capitalists) with a request for a demonstration of a working prototype, they would begin shuffling their feet and coughing nervously only to tell you that it's "in the hands of our testing department" or not being demonstrated due to "patent concerns".
...but you notice how they are already looking for investors? me too.
I hate to be pessimistic (No, I don't...I lied) but it seems that there was this guy at one time who had a V-6 engine that ran on evian, and his scam sounded remarkably similar.
I just need to see that their concept is based on good science before i start saving my pennies.
And think about this: There is'nt a semiconductor firm in the known universe that would'nt be scrambling like little weasels to get their hands on a technology such as this...least they be put out of business. Suffice to say- I'm basing my judgement as to the validity of these claims on how those companies react. (And they ain't even twitching, people.)
By the way...what happened to that guy who had the engine that ran on water? He's not returning my calls.
For those intereseted. . . .I was really surprised the register had $35 in the article title with the quote being £35!
.my keycodes didn't work! I dunno, it would either bring up a Netscape composer (yes I am using communicator) with the 3 above the keyboard, or beep at me for the 3 on the keyboard. hrmph, thank goodness for cut & paste!
btw. .
That kind of storage coupled with high speed internet access will hurt their feelings. Imagine having MP3s of all the music in your local Camelot and NRM in your pocket.
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
As of 5:10pm here in England, the Register seems to have pulled the story.
Complete hoax then?
----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
more space for mp3's and p0rn! or maybe even p0rn mp3's!! and don't forget about **BEOWOLF**!!
No offense intended, but does anyone else think that comment sounded like a semi bad Anime translation ala Final fantasy 7?
----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
First of all, if they are talking about 3D storage, how come they keep refering to how much a cradit card surface will store?
Pull out your credit card, if you have one. And if you don't, look at mommies. First take a look at the thing, wow, pretty small, right? Now, turn it on it's side, no, better yet, lay it down. Good. Notice how it sticks up off the surface of whatever you put it on. That's thickness. Now, stack 2 (if you can get them from daddy too) of them . . . still pretty thin, right? Keep going . . . oh, and file those bumpy names off of the cards while your at it . . . that will give you a more accurate representation.
Learn something every day, don't ya?
I'm still waiting for the 4D ram, or true 3D TV . . .
Dan
Seems someone stumbled upon some research into "holographic storage", read a couple of lines, and made a product announcement.
/. shouldn't even raise a brow. Currently--as for the last ten years--it's still at the research stage. The storage media are all kinds of exocic pure crystals. Data is stored in parallel focal planes, one bitmp of "pixels" at a time, by polarizing the crystal molecules. One "page" of data is written to an LCD display in the form of a bitmap, which is then projected into the crystal and focused onto a particular plane with optics. Readout occurs by doing the reverse: projecting one plane onto a CCD and reading off the individual pixels. The operation is inherently parallel, so depending on the size of each bitmap, you can be reading a whole lot of data at once. Essentially, the technology is similar to MO disks, but in 3D and in parallel.
That technology is far from new. It's been around for over ten years, and anybody on
Currently the biggest holdback still seems to be the limited writing cycles these crystals can survive. Last time I read up, it was something like 1000 cycles, maybe they improved it an order of magnitude. Also, many researchers seemed to be targeting it not only as persistent storage, but as RAM replacement. Done right, it can offer access speeds many times above silicon RAM. Also, it offers the possilibity of purely optical parallel searches: the query data is written to the LCD, then projected into the crystal. Through interference patterns with matching data in the crystal, planes containing matches are found instantly without sequential searching. I only skimmed the theory on that one, so don't quote me on details.
Anyway, all this theory comes from people who don't also claim improved toilet brushes. I don't know about the guys at Keele, but this stuff is for real. When it'll crop up at Wal-Mart is another question.
Well, the article did say this was the densest storage ever...
--
This is not my sandwich.
what do you do after x,y,and z, go back to a?
man's lack of foresight yet another problem.
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
After all, not too many other OS's can handle
humongous drive and file sizes like BeOS. What's
the max file size on BeOS again? Something like
16 petabytes or something?
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
Is this so-called 3D image storage device the same one the Industry Week Magazine mentioned several years ago?
It is something about a quartz-like device, and the storing/retriving of data is through laser, and the data supposed to be stored in holographic images, something like that.
If this 3D image storage thingy is the quart-zlike device, then it is certain _NOT_ a pre-vaporware thing.
Industry Week magazine carried a short intro-article several years ago (sometime pre-1996!!!) and the thing may have been going through several years of development already.
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Why not? He's got the room.
I dont know, but can we be assured that the data storage is even safe? If it gets gittered a little, will valuable data be lost?
.02 cents.
If something that small can hold that much data, wouldnt it make it very easy to corrupt data?
My
--SlayFire
-- J. Danziger JDanziger@mjcnj.com http://www.mjcnj.com