Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft and MIT Team Together
tomreagan writes "The New York Times is reporting that Microsoft has teamed up with MIT to launch a joint research initiative on educational technology. " It's the largest alliance to date of institution and company, to the tune of 25$US million with a strong focus on "instructional technologies." The feeling at MIT is "mixed" regarding the new project, called I-Campus.
iNtelligence
Actually, I do. This sucks in a big way. I'm so stunned I can't properly respond just yet.
Computer science is not that much different than usual science but people get carried away with all the nice bells and whistles. It's so much nicer to teach kids to use MS Word than the basics of paths, files and raw text editors. And the weird thing is that nobody sees a problem. It's like teaching kids just to use calculators and not teaching them the basics of everyday math.
In the end there's always too much to teach. The question just is: what should a university teach? The basics or the top? If the top then who will teach about the basics if not the universities?
Oops, sorry.
9pm-midnight.
Please moderate this up!
Thank goodness Stallman doesn't have any input in this. He doesn't teach, does he? My impression is that he's one of those guys who never left college to enter the real world. I know people like that at the U of Minnesota here. They latched onto a work-study job in the early 70's and have never let go. They're a leading cause of the staggering cost of a college education these days.
Actually, Apple just has a habit of dribbling down the toilet lately. Although they make flashy new Lear-Siegler ADM3 clones now, and I hear some flashy new cosmetic cases disguised as computers.
I can close my eyes and visualize how much pee would be sprayed all over the walls if an English speaker dared put the money symbol on the wrong side in the French language...
That was based, of course, on the previous poster's comment that the laptops aren't Linux compatible. A winmodem here, an unsupported video card there, and you've got problems.
Big McFucking Deal. The list of universities with "very strong computer science departments" that would, nevertheless, fail to elicit the description "most respected technical university" is volumous to say the least.
Just a list from the US would fill several megabytes.
Any MIT student who bases his/her doctorate on any one brand of computing equipment deserves to be laughed off campus. It's supposed to be about knowledge, and intellectual content is rather infrastructure agnostic. MIT is a big school, and I'm sure there are a variety of types and brands of computers, photocopiers, printers, light fixtures, centrifuges, lab ovens, etc. The only people who dwell too much on the brand names on all this equipment are the little gnomes who either never left campus to join the real world, or people from outside who try to politicize the whole issue because they have an agenda that has nothing to do with the pursuit of knowledge.
Let's get real. Students need equipment to get their schoolwork done. Computers are information appliances, except for a few disciplines on campus such as Computer Science.
Stop whining because it didn't all grow out of some utopia where free software runs wild like deer in the forest.
I never heard of MicroSquish. Is that a new maker of kitchen implements of some sort?
Ah, you wouldn't be an overgrown fan of Mad Magazine whose parody skills have been stunted as a result, would you?
I see. . .
They have been freeloading for years. I think that with the success of Free Software it's no longer necessary for them to be supported by public funding. Let RedHat pay for their wing of the building.
iNtelligence
iLinux
iEmacs
iZilla
iSpam
iHamAndEggs
iMReallyTiredOfThisShit
[see kids? this is what happens when you've been sitting in front
of the computer too long. I hope you've learned your lesson]
At least it's not "eCampus". I think I'd start shooting if it was.
Torvalds. Not Torvaldis.
I seriously doubt that many MIT students will base their doctorates on projects with Microsoft.
The ones that do are in it for the money alone and I am glad they won't be part of the mainstream scientific world anyway.
Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
It is also interesting to note that studies have shown that there is little instructional benefit in computers as currently deployed. In fact, some people decry the increasing commoditisation of education. The biggest problem I see is that while information in books can last for decades, computer technology is outdated within 3 years, leading to increasing reinventment of time to update teaching material, often at a higher penalty. Hence the interest in OpenSource which is human readable and can be adapted for whatever technology is likely to arrive. The ongoing costs, both operational and replacement is an invisible overhead that is ulimately bourne by the students, whether in fees or additional staffing overheads. The open question is whether this leads to "superior" pedalogical benefits. While neater essays (downloaded from the web) may be easier on the marker's eyes and encyclopedias can be more compactly stored, highly technical or professional areas are dependent on the understanding and mastery of quite difficult concepts and I've yet to see any technology that can accelerate this task. Also what computer can teach creativity, curiosity or the love of learning?
As for the role of corporations in universities, the issue is that either the individual pays (through loans or parental support), industry chips in with scholarships or the state subsidises (through regressive taxes). Thus education can be funded through future, present or past income (with endless policy debates among the funders). The increasing elimination of low-end blue and white collar jobs lost to automation and computerisation means that a larger bulk of the population shifts onto the higher education system which was never designed for massification. The question still remains is who gets to pay for this education? If the army could sponsor people through the GI Bill, why not corporations? If RedHat or TransMeta sponsored internships, would people be complaining? If so, then you could shift to Britain or Australia where studies have shown it is 30-40% cheaper. Given the increasing global mobility and availability of choice, there's probably a place somewhere that fits people's desires and budgets but ultimately you only get out what you invest in sweat.
Besides, there are many ways to learning about the world, backpack through Europe/Asia, raid a library, chat with your grandparents abour the lessons of their youth, or listen to the great speeches of past leaders. Given the wide variety, there's no need for formal schooling to get in way of an education.
LL
And you'd probably be right, because we know Red Hat's motives are much less dubious than Microsoft's.
Besides, when Ted Turner gives a billion dollars to the UN, what does he get in return? Nothing but a warm fuzzy.
When Bill Gates donates $25 million to MIT, what does he expect to get in return? A warm fuzzy? I don't think so.
I'm worried about morals at Microsoft. It may sound silly to mention those words in the same sentence but they really need it. Otherwise they will go down because nothing lasting can be built on money and greed.
I'm also worried about universities. They used to be places where people learn new things and produce people who are able to do research and inventions. Unix has been part of universities and it has taught students what an OS is and how to experiment with the source. With NT you just learn the visible parts and how to make software by connecting big pieces together. You sure learn to use a database but not how to make one.
I'm also worried about professors. They used to concentrate on teaching and research. You couldn't fool them with marketing talk because they knew better. Has the professors became stupider or have they became too interested in money?
Read Marcus Aurelius. Why does Microsoft give discounts and money to universities? To teach students to only use Microsoft. Why? To dominate the world. It shouldn't be that way.
MIT, perhaps the most respected technical university in the world (don't flame me if you're at Caltech..I'm a little resentful because i didn't get in :) )
Can we flame you for having a typical US-centric view of the world instead?
May I add that some of the best research results in the field of typing, OO, ... have been made by the Microsoft Research Organization. http://research.microsoft.com/
Why does MS remind me of a slimy politician.. nice suit..big phoney shit-eating grin.. perfect hair..all the right answers..
Perhaps it's because your deep-felt hatred makes it difficult for you to open your eyes and see the real world??
When you lay down in the mud, the mud does not get cleaner.
It's probably a quaint little Beowulf Cluster-f*ck scene.
Wow man.
Yes. The thing to note about MIT is that it is a big place -- big enough for multiple paradigms to coexist and barely notice each other. MIT, being a human creation, has plenty of good and evil, yin and yang, within itself to confound anyone's predictions. The MIT of X and Kerberos is also the MIT of Draper and Lincoln Labs. The same institution that was the first to openly distribute PGP online also has for decades had a think tank on campus funded largely by the CIA, or so it is widely believed. $25 million is a drop in the MIT bucket. It's more likely that MIT will coopt pieces of Microsoft than vice versa.
Organisations that co-operate with Microsoft rarely seem to survive, after their usefulness has ended.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
The term hacking was invented at MIT several decades ago. This event practically insures that someone will alter the "M" in MIT to MicroSoft either on web.mit.edu or on its marble facade.
of course... they let the kids have Microsoft technology so they become addicted to the games
Yeah, I've read about that, they're going to call it the Term Paper Wizard. It produces so much spagetti documentation that your Prof will fall asleep, then wake up and give you an "A" because he's embarassed to admit that he couldn't follow your premise.
With their new ActiveLearning(TM) program starting shortly, this will not be a problem!
From the article:
Under terms of the agreement, the intellectual property financed by Microsoft but done at M.I.T. will belong to M.I.T., but Microsoft will have the right to license it without paying royalties. But for research done jointly at Microsoft and M.I.T., Microsoft will have the first option to patent it.
Don't forget that RMS is also at MIT...
I wonder how much of this was an administrative decition and how much was staff and student directed. I would tend to guess that the "mixed" feelings are from the staff and students who are being brought into an MS world for the profit of the university. Welcome to MSMIT home of ICAMPUS.
First off for those of you who don't see this as a threat, Think of it this way...
The penguin (funny example right?) has evil plans for Batman. He steals lots of money in his latest scam and buys the mountain the Batcave is hidden in. He takes over the Batcave and uses all it's gadgets for evil.
Come on People this is stuff movies are made of! They make movies about this kind of thing because the right and wrong are clear. Kinda like the social Lowest Common Denominator.
ATTN: Bob Young
Enough analogy, this is a GREAT PR opportunity for Redhat. I say Redhat should offer to match M$'s "donation" dollar for dollar. With just one minor string attached. All software created under the funded GNU program should be GPLed and all patents should be made to the public domain. This would be excelent for Linux, Red Hat, GNU, MIT students and staff and the best part is...
It would turn this M$ PR stunt in to a PR disaster!!! ;)
I've got to go diagnose an XFREE86 problem for a newbie now, but please if you work for Redhat foward this to the man. Before they come after my university.
Novel theory: Modern Man evolved from psychopath
Wow, this sure is narrow minded of MIT to let MS help them with "research".
If MS has anything to do with it, the funds will prolly go 1% research, 99% marketing.
This seems to be the problem nowadays.. large companies fund the research so they can lay claim to intellectual property and exploit the results of research to their own financial gain.
Business wise - there is nothing wrong with this.. but academically this is a Bad Thing. Privatisation of research always seems to lead to results being heavily guarded in secrecy - which defeats the whole ethos of academic research!!
Free the knowledge - keep research open, and out of the meddling hands of private funding.
We *know* that? Really. Good to see you're unbiased. :->
As for what folks get for their donations, I'd say either your too skeptical, Anon, or not enough. Fear not, 'ol Ted will be seeing the benefits of his donations. He basically bought himself good PR for life, possibly in history.
Exactly what will M$ get out of it? Better software? Oh, the horror! M$ stuff that works! Domination of young minds? PUHLEEZE. Give the kids SOME credit!
You're just afraid of not having something to complain about, I think. M$ put $150M into Apple, and I think you'd be hard pressed to say that Mac users love Microsoft for it...
Sheesh. People aren't that dumb. And, believe it or not, Bill Gates isn't the anti-christ. Not that I'm putting him up for sainthood either though.
But Andrew Carnegie was considered a robber baron scum in his day. Today? Hmm... Time will tell.
46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
For all intents and pruposes, Microsoft bought out the computer science department here at Cornell back in 1996. Some of the faculty were so angry, they replaced the department's web page with a "Weclome to Microsoft" web page for a few days as a joke.
It has had some adverse effects. In particular, the undergraduate computer lab is all NT machines, with default networking capability. So you cannot do graphically-oriented programming assignmmets remotely from them like you could in the old days when you just set your DISPLAY, or (preferably) used ssh.
That's pretty key on a big compus like this when students have accounts in multiple departments (As a logician, I have four) and want to centralize. And graphical assignements are (enter value judgment here) becoming the norm these days.
It also cuts the undergraduates off from some of the cool research (like NuPRL and its applications to code optimization) being done at Cornell, because they were geared towards Solaris and the faculty refuse to bring them over.
The graduate students are largely unaffected. The computer science graduates have access to every machine imaginable; they are just behind the firewall where the undergraduates cannot touch them. The hybrids like myself all switched to the Ultra Sparcs in the Center for Applied Math.
So the end result? The undergraduates get screwed. They pay (a lot) to come to one of the top computer science departments in the country and get access to the same resources they could get anywhere else.
I am an MIT undergrad at the moment, and although I'm not very happy about the announcement, I don't think it's going to have that big of an impact on student life.
Let's face it, there are already free copies of windoze to whomever wants that OS. The fact that so many people choose *nix over windoze is a testament to personal choice that I think will continue, for atleast the foreseeable future.
Keep in mind, this was just made public. I'm positive there will be protests / angry opinion columns about the pact, since this was an administrative decision, not one of the students.
mparcens
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JavaScript Error: http://www.windows2000test.com/default.htm, line 91:
First, the idea is basically to improve educational technology (as least as I read it in my sleep-clouded state right now). So... MIT brains come up with a good way of delivering computer-aided-instruction over the internet. MS claims the patent, integrates it into Windows, implementing it as a de facto standard. All other C-A-I technologies are squeezed out, bought, or generally interfered with so they don't run reliably under Winblows. MS then denies other companies such as Novell, Oracle, anyone else basically from delivering C-A-I over the new MS "standard", thereby preventing students from learning anything but MS.
Second, this could also be one of two things. MIT has been a fairly major center for the development of unix/open source technologies (X-Windows is an example I believe). MS is either interested in merging such technology into Winblows (imo: not bloody likely), or subverting MIT such that MIT's support of unix/open systems/protocols/etc are compromised and it falls from grace in the unix/open source community.
Bono Vox, bono@vox.org
I'm am now writing "Why don't you suck up to Bill Gates some more, I'm sure he could spare $100 more than I can."
I'm am placing it in an envelope...
I am applying a stamp.
I am feeling good.
The story is a bit different a bit further up north (Manchester, UK). Although the university as a whole seems to have standardised on NT 4 machines, the CS dept. has a fairly large lab full of PIIs running Linux, as well as SGI workstations, Twinheads, etc.
And all the lecturers seem to slag off Microsoft as much as possible 8-).
They're now MSMIT.
Regards, Ralph.
Under terms of the agreement, the intellectual property financed by Microsoft but done at M.I.T. will belong to M.I.T., but Microsoft will have the right to license it without paying royalties. But for research done jointly at Microsoft and M.I.T., Microsoft will have the first option to patent it.
So if MIT does the research, MS can license it. But do the terms of the MIT/MS agreement allow MIT to release the results of their efforts freely to other parties? Can MIT release resulting code under an open source license?
(Hint: if MIT doesn't say it can explicitly, MS probably wrote the contract tight enough that they can't... e.g. MIT can publish in results in academic journals but there are restrictions on the source code generated.)
Any explicit confirmation or denial of my paranoia appreciated.
--LinuxParanoid
ActiveCampus? CampusX?
Does it seem a bit strange to anyone that MIT, the home of the Free Software Foundation, the GNU Project, and Richard Stallman, patron saint of the free software movement, has decided to team up with the king of corporate closed software design and practitioner of monopolistic business? I just find this Ironic. What do you think Richard Stallman is thinking right now? Jeremy
Looking for a Python IRC bot?
I think one of these days a study needs to be done to try and explain the inferiority complex that seems to run rampant among europeans. I feel for you people, I really do.
Anyone besides me notice that any time someone begins a post with "I'll probably get moderated down to a..." they get moderated up?
Oh, and insert "I'll probably get moderated down for being offtopic but..." up there at the beginning of this post.
In the end, other than bad press, this will have negligable effect of MIT. 25mil is a drop in the bucket for a school like MIT. The annual budget is in excess of 2 billion. Of course, the student body and faculty is mostly against it, and the administration is for it. Admins win again. Big whoop. Disclaimer: The administration includes a few financially/politically minded faculty.
First off, come to Walker tonight and Embrace, Eat and Evacuate! Wear a copyleft t-shirt if you have one! If they are giving food to us undergrads, complain about the administration's sell-out, but eat the food! :-p --Lael
This is a research deal. They're designing new educational technology. This is quite unrelated to what's used in classes and all the other labs. I can assure you the group I work for at the AI Lab/LCS will continue to run Debian until you pry our cold, dead fingers off of it. Athena, the campus network, will continue to be all-Unix, although it may drift from being Solaris-dominated to Linux at some point. Most of the students in my dorm will continue to run Linux. All that will happen is there will be a new research group on campus that may favor MS products. Nothing else will change much.
Culture and decisions at MS come from their strategic planners, not from grass roots. I will not trust MS until they are broken up and their marketers hog-tied with restraining orders. Only then will they be motivated to focus on producing better software instead of marketing it more aggressively.
Hmmmm - I can recall the days when introducing CALCULATORS into the edu environ was cause for alarm - "How will we get kids to learn math when they can just punch a few buttons and get the answer" instructors asked. "Teecher, why do I have to learn long division now that a box can do it for me?" Ditto's when 'interactive' computers took over - instead of having to punch a stack of cards, submit the program and wait several hours to get a printout back - there was no longer an incentive to weed out bugs the FIRST time.
:))
Like someone else mentioned, M$'s Raison d'etre and chief source of revenue is packaging complex software concepts so the uneducated layperson can utilize it - like Ford making the Model-T affordable to many people and raking in profits doing do, it didn't raise the quality of the average driver; contrarywise, it made it possible for any, ahem, idiot to become a menace to his or her fellow beings.
So, I'm fantasizing about M$ coming out with packages like "M$ TermPaper" - you pays you $95, put in the CD, it autoruns setup, it leads the 'student' thru a few generic menu selections and then spits out a 'paper' that is statistically unique but errily similar to the all other output it produces, in the way that all PowerPoint presentation kinda looks like all the canned example presentations, etc. Thus all the students are above average, dont' have to make much effort, gets a superficial idea of the process in case they'd ever have to really research something, M$ makes more, stockholders happy, alls right with the world, don't worry be happy, Ignorance is bliss.
Yours ever optimistically
Chuck
Little boxes
running windows
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
This alliance will not shore up Microsoft's failing prospects; it is just further evidence of the slide into mediocrity of my alma mater. The school where X was developed began whoring itself out with the Media Lab, which seems to be in the business of developing gadgets for the Sharper Image catalog; now it's going to work for Microsoft.
"Hey guys, we need more office space.." "gee.. those GNU people have been freeloading for years...." I can see this one coming soon, sigh
I give Slashdot too much credit by calling this a knee-jerk reaction; that implies that, somewhere, there are nerve cells near a knee. As typical free software false prophets (the same people who were praising Bill Gates three years ago, and who will happily follow corporate marketing to idolize Sun three years from now) you have the usual naive view that the world's software can be developed by a bunch of hackers sitting at home and writing code. No one seems to consider that free software constantly plays a game of catch-up, and why is that? Because research and development (not cloning) costs money. Sure, it's easy to write things like Gnumeric after the tough issues have been worked out -- at considerable expense -- by commercial software packages that came out ten years ago. So Microsoft gives MIT a pile of money and says, "Go play." Good. The money has to come from somewhere -- and I don't see VA Linux, RedHat, or any of Slashdot's favorite companies making any donations.
14 years one of the leading computer companies Digital Electronics Corporation (now Compaq)entered into a pack with MIT to develop distributed computing. They took Stanford's "W" system and fortified it into "XWindows" and made much of that source code open (The Motif part being an exception). They got several vendors to standardize on Sun's NSF (license required), Xerox EtherNet (license required), TC/IP. In 1986 network computing was anarchy with IBM, Apollo, HP MicroSoft, etc. promoting proprietary network protocols. So MIT knows how to tame and leverage computer companies.
Project I-Campus: MIT-Microsoft alliance
including the
MIT Press Release
- Seth Finkelstein
I'm currently a junior at MIT. As you might guess, this announcement is making me a little worried. What you're missing in your post is, Stallman and Berners-Lee and the rest have NO INPUT in these decisions. Financial soul-selling deals like this are made by our incredibly bloated, inept and indecisive administration, which has a significant track record of flailingly covering up their mistakes and being unwilling to listen to input from the people affected by their decisions (faculty, students, parents, etc).
There's a "Future Fest" party at MIT tonight (10/5), in Walker Memorial dining hall (check out the map at web.mit.edu or at http://web.mit.edu/jmorash/www/images/map.gif). It's sponsored by the Microsoft "Research" Propaganda Department, so if any Boston-area anti-M$ people feel like showing up, I highly encourage it.
Okay..so I've really been trying to not be so reactionary (is that a word) and maybe a little less paranoid etc... But..this really ...uh.. really really makes me feel icky all over. I mean MIT is like the shrine for open source... anybody here ever read the book "Hackers" ... It's all about the first generation hackers at MIT...all about the spirit of the true hacker, someone driven by the technology, the bits and bytes not the $$$ and stock options. MS just doesn't fit into that picture.
Sure I can understand the MS thinking...repeat after me:
"MUST INFILTRATE HIGH TECH UNIVERSITIES"
And I understand that universities need funding, but with MS it always seems more like the old payola scams from the 50's/60's. I'll give you a lot of money if you play these records on your radio station...
Why does MS remind me of a slimy politician.. nice suit..big phoney shit-eating grin.. perfect hair..all the right answers.. but you know they are just looking out one thing..and it's not you.
Ah well...at least I have a brain and I can still make an educated choice.
How and why did GNU get started in the first place? This move is MIT electing to run its CS department like a large state University runs its football team: a revenue generator completely alien to the ideals and goals of education and academic research.
You have just lost a student.
This only effects ICampus-related research. ICampus isn't the only research project on campus; in fact, it's not even a big one. MIT's annual budget is 2 billion. Compare this to 25 million. Drop in the bucket. The respectable LCS, the venerable AI Lab, and the over-hyped, ill-respected Media Lab will continue uneffected.
Here at CMU all the cluster NT machines have AFS on them. Although why you would want to use one of them as opposed the the linux boxes or sparc's is a mystery to me. The NT boxes suck, and are always screwed up.
:)
I have run both MS stuff and linux. Based on the strong similarity between athena and andrew(our network), its clear that you can use much more of the cool shit running *nix. Duh. This deal makes my stomach turn, but I have a hard time imagining that anyone running a *nix at mit will switch to windows for any reason.
Actually I'm heading out there this weekend to, among other things, set up a friends comptuer at mit... Time for her to make the switch from 98 to debian.
Imperial has one of the most well-respected aeronautical engineering departments. Formula 1 racing cars are designed in their facilities.
This may be true. But MIT has not only one of the best CS departments, one of the best aero/astro departments, but probably rates in the top 5 in nearly any engineering category you care to name. I know it certainly does in the US - I'm not quite as sure worldwide. That's why it's easy to defend as "perhaps the top" technical institution - it has an incredible breadth _and_ depth of institutional expertise.
Plus, their sciences ain't bad either - as a physics student there, I worked with 2 Nobel Prize winners, plus several others who are top notch in their specialties.
Hey now... Going to the school(cmu) that had "the largest token ring installiation in the world" I'd like to say it isn't all that bad. We don't have a whole lot of ibm stuff around anymore. The tokenring infrastructure now runs 10/100bt, and the only inconvience is having to buy the $15 strange-tokenring-plug -> rj45 adapters.
These deals come and go all the time.... although microsoft is a bit different from most companies.
Y'all may wish to read MIT's spin on the alliance -- if it's true, the scope of the project is limited. The administration might have its crazy ideas, but the professors, who care about their own research, keep them in line. Unlike the Scott Kreuger incident and aftermath (for those who aren't familiar, the dumbass drank himself to death) the faculty has a stake in this area, and will be keeping a close eye -- many a lab group use Linux (e.g. physics and math) and MacOS (biology, chem. e.).
*** Proven iconoclast, aspiring bohemian. ***
Bang the above one up a notch. The AC's got a very valid point. Microsoft has developed it's own architecture, and even with all the certification programs out there, there no way that they are going to find quality programmers that know their stuff in the future - unless the their "principles" are taught from an early age - which means influencing what colleges teach.
I'm 23 and I've been studing very deeply windows programming for about 4 years now. I'm also be the first one to tell you that in many "MS technology" areas, I still don't know diddle squat.
OT: Direct X 7 just came out, and it now has typelibs for Visual Basic - be afraid.
Who uses windows? At MIT, MS doesn t really care. They want theidea's, not to make every student hooked on NT. Don't get me wrong - they want kids hooked on windows, but the kids they areafter are a *long* way from college.
Does the fact that a US based corporation has bought a huge amount of influence into what is by anyone's definition, one of the most highly regarded educational institutions, bring any fear that this will only increase the rest of the world's dependence on a preditory US monopoly?
Put another way, one of the greatest strengths of Linux (and a number of other similar, non-MS products) is the fact that it isn't beholden to a single US corporation. A move like this on the part of MS threatens to flood the market with a great number of new grads with little window icons burned into their foreheads. When these technologists and managers and marketing people hit the world economy, what's the chance that they will think twice about implementing systems based on software that is, in more than one sense, "foreign" to them???
Your Servant, B. Baggins
I want a shiny, transparent blue casing covering my guts.
The real joke here is: At MIT, if a junior professor is a good teacher, the senior faculty take this as a sign that he or she isn't working hard enough on research, and so the professor's chance of getting tenure goes down. (My wife and I are both alumni of "Hell", so I know whereof I speak....)
So what is MIT doing to improve the quality of its education? Taking a $25M grant to build fancier computer systems! And after this grant money runs out, the extra hardware and software acquired through it will be part of the school's infrastructure, so MIT will need money to maintain it -- either from more tuition hikes, or from the overhead on more research grants.
send all spam to theotherwhitemeat@ropine.com
Can we flame you for having a typical US-centric view of the world instead?
That's like someone complaining that the statement "French champagne is perhaps the finest in the world" is French-centric because it doesn't mention the US or Italy or Spain or Australia. MIT and Caltech both have (deservedly) gigantic worldwide reputations, and to deny this would be truly parochial.
A Columbia grad (and a teetotaler)
Does anyone besides me find it ironic that Microsoft has chosen the home site of GNU and the FSF? It would seem to me that if Microsoft were truly interested in developing the best possible educational software and computer-based education, they would have gone to a university that specializes in such things, exactly as mentioned in the article.
Furthermore, I found Mr. Rashid's comment disturbingly vague. Hell, Microsoft Office is 'openly available'. You can get it practically anywhere, right? What does that mean, if anything?
But, as many have observed, the most disturbing part is how Microsoft can speak out of both sides of its mouth at once. How can something for which a patent is owned by Microsoft ALSO be 'openly available'? It would seem that if they *truly* wanted the results of this research to be 'openly available' they would have some third party own the patents, kind of like how X.org was created (and, if anyone recalls, there was a large attempt to suborn that as well. Anyone remember the OSF?).
This is all especially true if you're dealing with Microsoft-related software. It's not that Microsoft is intrinsically superficial in teaching. There's just too much to teach, too many to teach and all too fast. One could probably put together a 2 year course on the subject of COM (Microsoft's implementation of it), still not cover it entirely, and not even touch how one would *implement* such a framework if it didn't already exist. But in the frenzy of needing to keep up with the latest and get products out, COM courses are even being crammed into 2 weeks or less. And a respectable university has to teach all subjects, not just computer science and certainly not just Microsoft's implementation COM... although if students are going to come out with the "top level" and information that's useful, they may have to focus more heavily on teaching Microsoft's implementation of COM.
--
Quantum Linux Laboratories - Accelerating Business with Linux
* Education
* Enterprise Integration
* Support
*Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
Champagne? What is this, Wayne's World? In my original post, I stated that MIT is very likely the most respected _technical_ university in the world. I stand by this. Cambridge and Imperial are of course excellent schools with excellent reputations. However, neither posesses the engineering and fundamental technical sciences reputation or talent. I'm sure you'll find it very difficult to point out any university that rivals the resources, history, and ongoing talent base of MIT. World wide. If you do find one or two, my claim still stands as "perhaps." Read the post and use your brain a little bit before you start screaming that I'm so ignorantly US-centered.
Who do you thinks on top? Gates or Negroponte? Doggy-style or face-to-face?
OK, if you found this article a little upsetting, just wait for Phase II:
"Today the US Department of Education announced passage of a bill which requires that all students be instructed in using a computer, it's operating system, and basic applications such as word processing. Students will be required to take one class per week from 4th grade through high school graduation.
'It is imperative that our students have the computers skills that they will need to survive in the 21st century,' said the President, 'and we're very fortunate to have such support from the technology industry.'
Such support comes from Microsoft who cut licensing costs for all their products in half, including educational software co-developed at MIT to show students the proper way to use operating systems and applications. Microsoft's and MIT's educational software is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system and the Office suite of applications (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Outlook) making it the perfect choice all around for the classroom. The educational software will also provide a universal interface to other educational programs on subjects as varied as Automotive Repair, Citizenship, and Art Appreciation.
'We're very proud that our software has become the standard, to the point that it will be on every computer in every classroom in the US.' from Bill Gates, CEO of Microsoft. 'I've always felt that it was important to start teaching our children about computers as soon as possible. What they learn as children will guide them for the rest of their lives--and I can't express how happy we are to play a role in that!'"
uh, this is purely fictitious (at the time of posting...) Writing this I realized that getting Linux into the classroom (asap) is probably more important than I'd thought.
numb
personally i think they should call it e-campus ... so people wont get confused.. :)
What you need to realize is that the best place to carry the fight is to the enemy; if MIT can be convinced of the worthiness of this program and its results (we'll see in 4-6 years), then, despite the protests, kicking, etc. of Stallman, Berners-Lee and others, it will be considered a victory of major proportions. It is like 1928, when no one thought the US economy would collapse, that nothing like the Holocaust would happen, that the world would in ten years be gearing up for a war that would cost the lives of well over 50 million people. Sinclair Lewis, in his book _It Can't Happen Here_ demostrates this attitude and its ramifications perfectly. The lesson: it can here anywhere, no matter who is fighting, what the fight is. Like someone said, the dissenting voices have to be in control to prevent it and that isn't always going to be the case.
Think about it; if you want to develop a user base, and find future employees, a university is a perfect place; several thousand students using is for 4 years, learn it, train on it. Then, when they graduate, they take that knowledge with them, and, as MS hopes, they will purchase their products. It is a perfect business option (albeit not good academically), but we will have to deal with it.
Grandpa_Spaz
I'm not entirely sure where you're getting your information from, but I think you're confused.
I'm an MIT undergrad. All of the machines in the public clusters run Solaris or IRIX. All of the servers run Solaris. There's a very popular student-supported linux distribution. There are more than a few netbsd and freebsd'ers out there as well.
There's really not much of a chance that MIT will go whole-hog to Windows NT any time soon. At a structural level, Windows NT isn't suitable for our type of environment. MIT Information systems has been trying for a few years now to make Windows NT play nice with Athena (MIT's campus network) and, from what I've heard, has been having a miserable time of it.
In general, the _Mac_ is far better supported on Athena than Windows NT.
Yes, a large amount of research work is being done on Windows NT boxes. That's largely due to the fact that those boxes were donated to the Institute. But Microsoft isn't the only one donating software and equipment, either. As I write this, in fact, I'm sitting between a Motorola PowerPC box and a DEC Alpha, both donated by their respective manufacturers.
Yeah, Microsoft does get some mindshare out of the deal, but mindshare doesn't necessarily translate to acceptance. If you spend a lot of time with a crappy product, does that make you want to spend even more time with it?
Remember, kids, this is digital information -- it's potentially lethal
Ahhhh, that explains it. Hemos is not from outer space. He is from France. Really.
Champagne? What is this, Wayne's World?
I didn't bring it up.
In my original post, I stated that MIT is very likely the most respected _technical_ university in the world. I stand by this.
I'll agree that it's probably the most respected technical university in the US and one of the top few in the world.
Cambridge and Imperial are of course excellent schools with excellent reputations. However, neither posesses the engineering and fundamental technical sciences reputation or talent.
Rubbish. Cambridge has a very strong computer science department, for example. One of the first (arguably the first) programmable computers was built there. It's produced (and continues to produce) many successful startup companies. ARM, for example.
Imperial has one of the most well-respected aeronautical engineering departments. Formula 1 racing cars are designed in their facilities.
I'm sure you'll find it very difficult to point out any university that rivals the resources, history, and ongoing talent base of MIT.
History? Oh, yes, I forgot. Nothing counts before the 18th century.
World wide. If you do find one or two, my claim still stands as "perhaps."
Well, yes. You can't disprove a statement which includes a "perhaps".
Read the post and use your brain a little bit before you start screaming that I'm so ignorantly US-centered.
The reason I said something like that is that the "don't flame me if you're from Caltech" comment seemed to me to show that you perhaps hadn't thought to look for anything outside of the US. Of course you also didn't mention CMU or some of the other excellent schools in the US.
(I do apologise, BTW. I must be somewhat bored today.)
I'm a junior at MIT in physics and computer science. This place is pretty hardcore UNIX and I don't think that is going to change overnight. We've spent the past 15 years developing our network operating environment (called Athena) and just because Bill wants to show a little cuff, we're not about to throw it out and start all over.
The deal is not as sinister as it sounds. The motivation is that MIT needs money to run its operations (which are quite costly) and MS wants to recruit. This really isn't about OS dominance.
I just spoke with Hal Abelson (CS professor who invented scheme and other things) and it appears that the MIT wrote in to the contract that all the stuff that comes out of this $25Million deal has to be based on Open Source platforms, which rather precludes the mass proliferation of Windows on campus.
cya
It took me a while to find it, but there was an article about a month ago here on /. that predicted that this exact situation would happen.
Your Servant, B. Baggins
Maybe the weight of evidence supports the economic view. MS corporate support for public education is in line with the public's choice of MS products. Since this is a free market outcome, education should relect the free market decision. No wonder MIT economists defended MS at DOJ trial...
I can see the emerging MS Internet strategy: Haves use MS - havenots pay... They collect both ways!
As far as I can see, we got a pretty sweet deal out of it ($25 mil). That's more than Microsoft gave any other university. That, and just last spring we get $20 mil for a new building from them. Way to go!! Take the money and run I say. MIT's not going to fall into Microsoft's ways. The Media Lab, LCS, and the AI lab are completely outside the influence of this project. Oh, and don't expect any of the unix machines on campus to come down anytime soon either. All MIT has to do is play nice with Microsoft in the media.
I attend MIT and I can attest that there are many negative feelings towards Microsoft's encroachment (btw: there is an anti-MS rave tonight... who knows... maybe they will be handing out X11 pills?) ... however, $25 mil is $25 mil, even if the person giving it away writes shitty software. One thing that won't fly is any requirement that we start using their software...
dan
This is most assuredly the next (last?) phase of MS's warplan for wiping Unix off the map. If they infiltrate and occupy the educational system, Unix will go the way of Tibetan monks, a culture without a homeland.
Granted Linux technology is superior to anything Microsoft has produced. But a great weakness of the free software movement is the difficulty of acting with force as a cohesive unit. Where is the Linux community negotiating contracts with Universities and research companies? For one, free software is small money, for another it's effectively ruled by committee and debate, inefficient for action. Bill G can decide he wants this and legions of his troops energetically follow his wishes. RMS can preach morality and virtues but can't unilaterally make things happen. And the mass of common people who don't know what the free software movement stands for willingly (and ignorantly) go with the propaganda and follow their friends in buying Windows.
Free software has such a quiet voice. And so little money. He is using his strength against our weakness to defeat us, and in the end if nobody in college uses Unix any more it will be marginalized forever.
Sounds just like a grown-ups version of Disney.
That's like someone complaining that the statement "French champagne is perhaps the finest in the world" is French-centric because it doesn't mention the US or Italy or Spain or Australia. MIT and Caltech both have (deservedly) gigantic worldwide reputations, and to deny this would be truly parochial.
I'm not denying that MIT and Caltech both have excellent reputations - they do. So do Imperial College or Cambridge University in the UK, or several institutions in other countries.
Ignoring most things outside of the US seems to be a common American trait. The original author, in that post, showed that trait.
P.S. French champagne is by definition the finest champagne in the world, since authentic champagne is only made in Champagne, France. See www.champagnes.net if you're interested.
The first time I see a resume from an MIT grad, that lists "MSCE" under "qualifications", then I'll know that the MIT I once admired is no more.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
It's the one piece of open-source code I can name that's bad enough that it could have come from MicroSquish.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
I agree completely.
Good professors are routinely punted in favor of professors who are utter failures in the classroom, but bring in the big bucks. This is just another step in that direction.
*sigh*
So, you're an alum. What should I do?
It's clear by this move that MS already have :-)
For another perspective on the way MIT has changed, you might be interested in visiting the ILTFP home pages. I don't know how widespread the ribbons are.
--
Xenu loves you!
nothing lasting can be built on money and greed.
How about the US economy? Last I checked, it had pretty much won out over communism.
MSMIT is blatant wholesale co-opting of the US educational system to the purposes of one corporate strategy. It will be the milestone in history where your career path is your .edu path.
Royalty free licensing and patent rights serve only to dress the real story - purposing of the public education system for corporate gain.
Well speaking as a '97 MIT alum still in Cambridge, while I'm bothered I'm not alarmed. The core computing infrastructure on campus is the Athena environment consisting of networked workstations running all flavors of unix, including quite a few linux boxes in dorm rooms and even labs. While microsoft products are used extensively in the administration, and perhaps for a lot of writing, network support of microsoft clients is only marginal. The investment in unix based technology and know-how has got to overshadow MS's $20 million. This might actually have some interesting implications on the openness of any standards developed. To be truely usefull to the MIT community, they are going to have to write unix/linux clients for any collaborative tools. People are going to want to continue to keep their email in their unix home directories so that they can get at it from any cluster - in fact, this might force a port of AFS to NT! Otherwise, the results of the MS project will be fairly marginalized - some professor decides to make people use it, so they run it at home on their dual-boot PC's or go to one of a presumably small number of MS stocked computer clusters (compared to the unix Athena clusters spread _all_ over campus). Incidentally, the famed Media Lab is already mostly funded by corporate sponsors, and little of the research done there is "academically pure" - most of it is either owned or optioned by outside companies already.
Well, I had thought about this possibility. I still see it as a faint hope, but only just. I would be much more optimistic if this move to join together MIT and Microsoft had been done with the consent of everyone involved (and if there weren't _extremely_ sketchy provisions in the contract about who owns what intellectual property... *shudder*), but since it's a decision that's been made solely to get money, I fear Microsoft will have far more control over the situation than MIT will.
I feel that MIT's nerd-powerhouse culture is being killed off in many ways. We're becoming more mainstream and more corporate. Despite all of the blathering by upper-level admin types about MIT being the "Stewards of the Future", I won't be surprised if we're a humourous footnote in 20 years.
Do you have a time for this?
Don't want to spend my entire evening waiting outside.
Hmmm.....
I dunno about that....there are alot of kids here that pay $22,000 + cost of books (which is high)...which makes me wonder are univerities in need of money? My school seems to have enough to put up stupid electic signs all over campus...would they do that if they were hurting for money?
A lot of posters seem to have concluded that MIT sold out or that MS
will corrupt the school. The worry seems to be that because MS
provides the money, they will dictate how the money is spent, forcing
MIT students or faculty to do something they wouldn't otherwise do.
For example, MS would restrict MIT's ability to share the results of
its research.
I think these worries are mostly misplaced. The amount of money is
non-trivial, but a relatively small part of the MIT budget. MIT also
has a long history of doing research with corporate money and freely
distributing the results.
MIT's annual research budget is mostly likely more than $700 million.
So a company spending $25 million over a few years probably doesn't
get to dictate a lot. (It's a little mind-boggling to think, though,
that Bill Gates's personal wealth could fund all the research for a
good number of years.)
A good historical example to consider is Project Athena. MIT got
millions of dollars from IBM, DEC, and Xerox to explore new uses of
computing in the curriculum. The freely available fruits of that
effort include X and Kerberos. It's worth noting that it presumably
wasn't the companies pushing the free distribution of that software,
because the Andrew window system, developed with funding from some of
the same companies, withered because of licensing restrictions.
(I'm an undergrad, currently) Recently the administration required all freshmen to be housed on campus for their first year. This would mean that the thriving Greek system at MIT would have to rush sophomores instead of freshmen, and would likely result in the closure of some houses.
There were huge protests by the student body against the administrations actions, and although an overwhelming number of students were against the policy, it looks as though MIT is going ahead with its original plan.
In the same way, I don't think the MIT administration will change its mind about taking the money from Microsoft. Think about it: The students who are screaming against the alliance will be gone in 4 years with graduation. All they have to do is wait, and people will forget about it.
mparcens
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JavaScript Error: http://www.windows2000test.com/default.htm, line 91:
Read "Killing off Linux: It's all academical" by B. Pfaffenberger in the Linux Journal. Very enlightening in this respect.
I shuddered when I saw this. I'm a freshman at RPI right now - I decided to come here instead of MIT due to monetary concerns [read: didn't want to owe $75,000 at graduation]. Right now...I'm terribly happy that I made this decision. I would have gone mad if I had to put up MS propaganda for four years in a place that was supposed to a very open environment.
:) ), has licensed itself off to the largest, most predatory corporation in the world. The administrators at this school have sold their souls to the devil. (I actually don't have _that_ big a problem using MS software or anything, but..when it is forced down my throat I will scream bloody penguin murder).
/.] has to stay together and be vocal, with one voice. Linux isn't going to win based solely on its techincal merit, I'm sad to say. It's the things like this we must work hardest to fight.
I have a problem with this article itself..particularly the paragraph that states that MS products have become the "de facto standard" among universities. While there is a slight overreliance on Excel and Powerpoint by much of the faculty, IRIX and Linux, as well as Macs and at least one other flavor of Unix, are a very large part of this campus. This I like. If Microsoft tried to move into this university, there would be very vocal opposition from any number of clubs and societies.
While I don't have that big a problem with MS software itself, I think this is a totally inappropriate move on their part. I can't believe an institution like MIT would, essentially, let Microsoft hire all of its students. I can see it now - no more *nix servers on campus, free copies of windows to make sure it's on every desktop, extreme pressure on the Linux community, the pushing of MS development tools...this literally makes me sick. MIT, perhaps the most respected technical university in the world (don't flame me if you're at Caltech..I'm a little resentful because i didn't get in
Anyway, I got 5 hours of sleep last night, and this is probably totally random, so I'm going to shut up while I'm ahead. None of you need to be told how horrible this is. The non-MS using public of this country [ie
Good day.
I would be most interested in hearing about the reactions from the MIT campus about this. Just how will non-MS technologies be used and applied? Does MIT academic interest retain any power or influence in Computer Sciences any more? Is this the end of the Media Labs as we've come to know and respect them? Perhaps most importantly, is the MIT student body really going to stand for this?
Ok, we have the I-Mac, Itanium, and now the ICampus. What's next?
Yes :)
I noticed the same thing a few weeks ago:
http://slashdot.org/co mments.pl?sid=99/09/23/0036227&cid=508
[And insert it at the beginning of my post too.]
well, it certainly didn't turn out as msft planned. a rather funny contingent of anti-msft'ers was followed by the stomping of raffled out copies of office2k by a select individual. the rather insipid msft videos they showed were answered with collective groans. and worst of all, the co-coordinator of the event turned out to be harold abelson, the man who has perpetuated the pain of 6001 (scheme) upon us at mit.
hmm... funny that you think you're "safer" from invasion attempts. After all, Microsoft does more hiring from U of Waterloo than any other school in the world. Think about that.
May I have my MS Education(TM) now, please? When I get my MS Diploma(TM), I will get a really good MS Job(TM) that pays lots of MS Bucks(TM) (I couldn't do MS Money(TM), that is already taken.) Then I'll be MS Happy(TM).
Students Mixed on Prospect Of Building Named for Gates
- Seth Finkelstein
BORG!!!!!!!!
Just wait for the response from the students... that whic has not already happened yet
I dunno. I'm doing a postdoc at Waterloo, and NT sure seems more common here than it did in Illinois, where it was basically non-existant.
MIT is now owned?!?!? They have an operating budget of $700 million dollars! $25 million over four years is nothing! Anyway, as a student, I can assure you that none of this has affected MIT culture, judging by the reaction students had to Microsoft's event tonight :-)
this sounds a lot like ms has just endowed a 2d media lab, only without the possibility of intellectual cross-training the likes of which the current media lab gets from being a) multi-sponsored and b) truly multi-disciplinary.if MS was genuinely interested in doing anything other than getting a bunch of student slaves and protecting intellectual property, they would have endowed the media lab, which exists for exactly the purpose stated here. only problem, of course, is that they wouldn't be able to enforce their precious NDAs.
god is just pretend.
EEEeek. This scares me too. Thankfully, I'm at the University of Waterloo in Canada and I think we're a bit safer from M$ invasion attempts... at least for the moment. And we have a pretty serious *nix community/environment here.
One of the most disturbing aspects of this collaboration, is the idea of big business being able to have power over education... when are they going to start "donating" more than money? When is it going to start dictating what's taught at university? I realise universities need to get the money from somewhere, but I wish it didn't have to be businesses with such a biased interest.
Universities are traditionally the home of the idealistic spirits. We are young and still have the delusion :) that we can change things. At univ. you are not just learning a skill to get a job, you are getting an education... learning to think for yourself. I am afraid that if big business gets too tied into universities, the environment that fosters this free thought will be stifled.
Think about it... who is traditionally involved in the revolutions and demonstrations (world wide)? It tends to be the intellectuals, students, university professors. These are the people who have learned to think for themselves, and not be spoon-fed propaganda (gov't or business). If businesses start owning universities, they will stop being public institutions that support diversity and choice. Where will we go to learn freely, then ?
---
I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
So.
Farewell then
AI lab.
You were instrumental
In the development of GNU
But now you are
0wn3d.
axolotl.
Actually, there's nothing wrong with putting the $ after the number, it's not based on an MS syntax. It's the style in which people who speak French write monetary values. Don't go to Quebec or France.. you'll freak out.
---
I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
Well, I believe the reason folks are railing against it is obvious: Microsoft has a habbit of using folks and taking thier ideas. Apple does, too, but they at least ask to have the ideas first...
Help us build a better map!
This is nothing new really. Universities have been doing this for a number of years. It's a good way to get money for your school, especially if it is a public school facing budget cuts. As people have mentioned, sponsoring companies always want something in return. Companies are not philanthropists. The shareholders wouldn't tolerate it. The portions of the agreement I saw sound typical to me, with MIT and microsoft sharing the rights to what is discovered, more or less.
I don't see universities turning down many deals like these. They don't often apply any moral or philosophical ideas when considering these type of things. If they do, they are considered to be "biased", "having an agenda", etc. Basically they don't want to make anyone mad. As long as money is flowing in, everything is ok. Sounds a lot like a corporation, doesn't it?
MIT has other "questionable" partnerships as well. At the most recent job fair at my school, they had a rep from their Lincon Laboratories. From the literature I read, they're basically a cutting edge technology lab for the department of defense. Now, you might argue that defense is a necessary evil. But I though universities were supposed to be a place of life, enlightenment, learning, etc, not an agent of mass destruction.
Deep down in my idealogical heart I wish the arguably best technical university in the world wouldn't participate in stuff like this.
This is not philantrophy. This is drug-dealer marketing.
Look what is being given. Windows, and money. And you have to take the Windows to get the money. The last sime I saw somebody pay to give something to somebody else, it was hazmat.
If Microsoft made a simple grant, that would be philantrophy. But instead, they attached all these strings--Windows gets to infiltrate.
Is the dealer down the corner being philantrophic by giving away packets of crack to newcomers? No, he knows that this is how you get and retain paying customers (i.e. junkies).
Watch what Microsoft gives away. It often "contributes" huge amounts of resources for a project--in the form of software. Software which costs Microsoft nothing except the media costs. And while there is an opportunity cost associated with it (that is, it keeps them from charging license fees), this is outstripped by the licenses bought by those who get hooked on Windows early.
--The basis of all love is respect
It doesn't have to be as bad as you make it out to be...
VNC will let you work remotely on an NT box. It can be done completely securely. True, they can't be used by multiple users at once, but you *can* do graphical work from far away. With persistent and shared sessions even -- something that X can't do (without VNC, at least).
ssh is available freely as both client and server for Windows. Personally, I just compiled a version of the latest CVS for Windows. (I added an option to skip text-mode translation with a flag). I am now checking in and out on an NT box using a secure and compressed (ssh) connection.
You can also run xterm and other X clients on Windows boxes if you would like. That's not very hard to get working.
You would think that a limitting situation would encourage you to innovate and work out solutions...
- Rob
http://www.thenation.com/issue/990927/0927manning. shtml
corporate america sinking their hooks into america's schools...
Just what the subject said. When you dance with the Devil, the Devil changes you. The financial toadies that run universities will agree to anything that impacts the bottom line. (If this donation subtracts $2.50 per student per semester its a good idea.) MIT will not change MS. MS is already full of geeks and its still run by Bill.
Stallman can tell you all about the ruthlessness of the MIT lawyers and beancounters. Thats why he started GNU Emacs. When the beancounters sold Emacs (which was the work of the lab hackers), he started GNU Emacs and the rest of the GNU line to stop this type of intellectual whorishness.
For what its worth.
I suppose I should say that agreements like this are nothing new. Universaties right now are more like corporate labs than anything else. The americans do it. The japanese do it. The europeans do it. They're people who aren't very wild about the cozy relationship between business and universities. But it's a fact of life especially with decreased goverment funding of the basic and applied sciences.
Frank Ghery, as you may know, is designing MIT's new computer lab. I don't know how much time Frank himself spends in front of a computer, but his designers use a program called CATIA. On UNIX workstations.
h tml.
In case you're unfamiliar w/ Frank Ghery's work, it's very sculptural. I did a quick search w/ Google and found a link w/ a couple of pictures: http://www.vandaaz.com/vandaaz/titanium/titanium.
Now, as you might imagine, creating construction documents for such a beast requires extraordinary measures. I used to be the CADD manager at the local firm (Cannon) in Boston that has been contracted by Ghery's office to assist w/ the project. I stopped by last week to have lunch w/ some friends, and got to take a look at the drawings. One of the interesting things I found out is that the 3D CADD file itself is considered to be a construction document. In other words, the people contracted to build stuff are not only reading information on paper, they are required to use the CADD file itself to obtain information necessary to construct the building. Considering that almost every nook and cranny of a building like this is unique, that makes a lot of sense.
This is not at all typical. CADD files, even 2D drawings, are usually considered "instruments of service", or some such thing. When you get an operation, the doctor doesn't give you the scalpel when he's done. Ditto for CADD drawings (not that they're never provided, but I stray...). CADD drawings are used to create paper construction documents, which are stamped, signed, and used to build the building.
What does this have to do w/ Microsoft? Nothing. That's the point. Of course there are people working on this project using Microsoft products, but I think it's interesting to note that what may well be the most significant document of all is done on UNIX.
--Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
"Learning these things from (say) a hyperlinked set of webpages is not fundamentally different than learning them from a book."
:-)
Of course, theorectially, not.
But, really, it is.
Reading a book, or a single page web site with no links, I am forced into a linear pattern. I must grasp one concept flowing to the next. I must understand a, which comes before b, which are both used to come up with c.
On the net, I click on what I'm interested, Turing Tests or Tennyson, Nodes or Nietzche, you choose, and choose, and ten to one you don't go back. You learn A and jump to N and to T and back to I to Q and U and E.
I don't know which way is better. I mean, on a typical romp on the net I'll learn if my new network card is compatable with BeOS (Yeah! It is, woohoo.) how much money I have in my bank account (doh!), some news pertaining to oppression of my religious beliefs (goddamn national prayer day, I wish I could live in Minnesota), a chunk about a new and coming poet, and end up here on Slashdot, listening to people spout off about Microsoft.
Most of my books don't run the gammet like that. I think it's best to have a few of these things going at once . . . at least, it's best for me.
My problem isn't that I'm too focused, it's that I have too many hobbies.
bye
Dan
What the shame to watch one's country go down the toilet.
More?
Am I being too paranoid, or is this more evidence of MS's apparent quest to convert all mortals to the Dark Side?
Let me explain what I mean. I'm not long graduated from university (Computer Science at Cambridge, England). During my final year, I saw some evidence of Microsoft apparently trying to, well, "indoctrinate" us before we learnt about any alternative OSes. (Disclaimer: My 2p worth, my interpretation.)
Sure, MS have given lots of money to the Computer Laboratory there, but the place is now crawling with NT. All the central public access terminals have become NT4 (albeit using Netware, not NT Server). There are rumours "on the streets", as it were, about the current Solaris teaching servers perhaps being replaced by an NT-based setup when the time comes to "upgrade" them. MS have even offered free, perpetually licensed, personal copies of Visual Studio 6 (Enterprise Edition, no less!) to certain CS students, in order for them to become familiar with VS6 and use it in the course of their final-year projects... (Alas, not me; the offer didn't apply to graduating students.)
It's difficult to quantify, but I've got a gut feeling of [[[SHUDDER]]] from this story...
Any large company would never invest that
kind of money without expecting something in
return.
You can expect this I-Campus (I'm surprised they
didn't use a small i) to use boxes with Microsoft
software installed. That's how they do business.
So.. of course the feelings are mixed.
I-Sex
Speaking as one who has been a part of the on-line education craze, I welcome? Microsoft's involvement. I say this because it scares me whenever Microsoft becomes involved and the word "patent" comes into play. Could this mean that Microsoft is trying to move to patent on-line education (or parts of it). I think about the only thing worse than software patents are Internet software patents.
Will Microsoft again try to propriatize something that doesn't belong to them?? I am growing afraid that the answer is a resounding YES.
I hold out a lonely hopeful flame however, maybe with Microsoft's involvement in EDUCAUSE, there can be some sort of collaboration to make both the IMS standard (one of EDUCAUSE's offerings to the on-line education arena) and on-line education in general more accessible to everyone. The field really needed some big bucks from somewhere to get it a kick in the pants, unfortunately (or so it seems) that money came from the reigning king of closed non-standards.
Please Microsoft, for once, do the right thing and make on-line education an open (and thus pervasive) standard.
The "Top 10" Reasons to procrastinate:
10.
Althought not a grad of MIT (or CS from anywhere for that matter) I believe we are not giving enough credit to the Faculty and students at MIT. MIT houses (correct me if i am wrong) Tim Berners-Lee, Richard Stallman, and a host of other standards or open-source evangelists. I do not think that MS can fool, or coax, or bribe MIT into becoming a satellite of Redmond. It is in MIT's best interest to fund itself, and if it is with MS, or Sun, or any other corporation so be it. MIT has helped develop standards, and I believe they will continue to do so, despite the MS marketing juggernaut.
Last night, Microsoft Research held a "FutureFest Party" at MIT to celebrate the new collaboration. The student sentiment was largely ANTI-MICROSOFT. Several times the students shouted "Microsoft SUCKS!" When the Microsoft people were giving away copies of Office2000 as door prizes, several students stomped on and destroyed their copies on the spot. There was no shortage of people wearing Penguin shirts. In summary, MIT students are very much not happy about this new collaboration.
"Gee, I like all the money that is getting thrown at me, but I don't like the fact that I'm selling my soul." Something like that, maybe? Seriously, though. I don't like the idea of any single company running something like this.
Maybe Apple.
Or RedHat.
I think it would be better if they worked with a team of companies: OS and UI places, embedded systems gents, hardware design houses, everyone. That would be a more holistic way to create a "classroom of the future" or whatever the hell the boys in Redmond will market it as.
"As long as the results belong to the universities" And that is the operative phrase.
The goals of business and the goals of academia while not quite 180, certainly aren't side by side either. Busines now is characterized by keeping knowledge secret [for competative reasons].
Academia is based on openess and sharing of information and ideas[professional reputations]. Closed meets open. The only thing these two have in common is the need for money and who has the money?
Business as usual in universities these days.
MIT and other institutions are increasingly
looking to corporations to become "partners in
research". Government funding is not what
it used to be.
Personally, I don't see this MIT/Microsoft
partnership as being bad. MIT, of all places,
will not become a "Microsoft" campus very easily.
There are people there still using LISP machines.
The entire campus network is UNIX-based.
For the conspiracy minded, note that the head
of LCS, Dertouzos(sp?) is a good friend
of Bill Gates.
As I see it after reading the Halloween documents this i clearly done to try to cut linux at it roots. But MIT is the only one loosing. Even if they can't see because of the money in their eyes.
Hrm. MIT is now owned. Bye Bye MIT. Stanford... (Clinton's daughter? nah.) so much for the striaght A's. i think i'll consider CMU and NYU for my next school then. CMU location is no good. NYU doesn't have high speed networked dorm. UC Berkeley, maybe UC Berkeley... hey are Berkeley chix too political? cute but political. anyone from Berkeley give some insights?
First big shots like Ted Turner blast Gates for not being philantropic enough. Now, M$ decides to actually GIVE SOMETHING BACK to society, and we're railing against it. C'mon now. If it were Apple or Red Hat, I suspect folks would be cheering.
;-> College is all about growing up and being open minded. I don't that believe today's undergrads are sheep.
Despite whatever misgivings we may have, the fact is that this money will help students by funding research. This EMPLOYS students. At least 5 years ago when I got my undergrad, getting an in-major research or even "gopher" position was like finding the holy grail!
If you're being brainwashed in college, you probably aren't smart enough to run a computer anyway.
So let M$ fund some research. Maybe it'll give other businesses (Hello... calling Sun and HP) to do more for higher education.
46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
AAAaaaaAAAAAaaaRRRRGGGHHH!!!
I already have the sinking feeling that this will get moderated down to a troll but I simply can't go on without saying this, hopefully for the benefit of Slashdot but certainly for my own sanity.
The dollar sign goes in front of the number. Five dollars is $5, not 5$. I see this all the time and I'm starting to wonder how many people learned punctuation from MS BASIC.
Thank you for your time.
is that like 'I, Robot'?
:)
"There is no spoon" - Neo, The Matrix
I went to Marist College in Poughkeepsie, NY - which isn't far in any direction from some of the big IBM buildings.
IBM gave the college a 3090 mainframe (top of the line then) just to see what they could do with it. There was a $15 million dollar joint-study, where IBM gave the school PS/2's at cheap prices and all sort of other things.
Now, given we were damned to a Token Ring network, it was still a great bonus for any student there. At a small traditionally liberal arts school, we got to play with stuff that was normally reserved for the bigger schools. I feel that I was able to learn a helluva a lot more without going to a MIT or Cornell, etc... (and a lot cheaper)
However MIT is already pretty far up there as far as technology goes - perhaps this will push them even further - or maybe we'll get an X port of Word. Wow - word on a RISC chip - a 100M executable ?
Isn't anybody going to consider the reverse possibility. Is there truly no hope for Microsoft to ever turn into a respectable organization in the eyes of /.'ers? Sure, you might not think it likely, but I suspect (naïve as I am) that they might just want to get together for mutual improvement. If MIT can improve Microsoft's operation so it starts producing software that leaves us in a world where we don't have to practically overthrow the whole institution of computing to get things done right, I'm for that. This is probably not a popular view here on /. so being an "anonymous coward" for this post is probably a good thing; It looks like nobody else here would raise this possibility.