Slashdot Mirror
IBM Leaving Retail PC Market
SabbathRM sent in this story from nyJournalNews.com about IBM's plan to stop retail distribution of their Aptiva PCs on January first. They'll still be available over the Internet, at least for the present, just not on store shelves.
Huh?!?!??! IBM supported the PS/2's for at least 10 years!!! IBM has Win2k beta support tips for my three year old laptop (not that I could afford enough ram to run it). Of anything you can criticize IBM for, long term support aint it. Now, their mysterious part numbering system and their spontaneous renumbering can definitely be criticized. Matt
WRONG! :>
;)
You got 2nd
Hahahaha!!!
Delphis
It has a SCSI wannabe connector because it is supposed to be sold as a system, duh. It was a great idea and still it is a great idea. Not many people want to have minitowers in their sight, right on their desks. No PC these days is very proprietary. If you are looking for that go to SGI (VW). For other manufacturers the margins are not enough.
For another thing, I've never known anyone who's bought a packaged machine who hasn't received faulty hardware in along with it. I got my first machine second hand in 1994...Since then I've been patching it with parts as I've needed to, and only recently bought and entirely new case and keyboard. With the exception of the original motherboard (which was due to bad wiring in this house anywayz) I've never had a problem with hardware.
Not so for other people I've known who've bought packages. Bad hard drives, bad monitors etc...They've had to take them back to the company several times in some cases.
My third gripe with the big companies is that they rip people off. Back in 94 when I got my first 486 I got it for $2100 AUD. That was a 419 Mb hard drive, monitor, keyboard, 8 Mb of old DRAM, a Trident 1 Mb video card (good at the time), and an ESS 688 sound card, not to mention the loads of warez that was preinstalled on the hard drive. *grin* I wouldn't have seen a machine at that time like that for less than probably $2500 AUD, and my recent upgrade to a Celeron 400 with 64 Mb of SDRAM, a new case, a Voodoo Banshee 16 Mb video card, 13 Gb hard drive cost me and PS/2 keyboard cost $960 as I already had a monitor, mouse, soundcard and 33.6k modem. I wouldn't have seen a recent package with the stuff I got when I upgraded for less than $1200, and in most cases I'd have paid a heap more for the hard drive in particular, so I saved at least $300.
The moral of the story is that if you want to buy a reliable, cheap PC and you don't want to have to be dictated to by the likes of Microsoft and others, then companies like Compaq, Dell, Gateway and so on are absolutely for the birds. They give you nothing you do need, and everything you don't.
You might get more raw performance from a Compaq 350 than an IBM 450, but that is merely a perception of "performance". One also gets more raw performance from a Windoze boot than OS/2 because Windoze doesn't bother to check if all your icons actually still link back to something real. Corporations want reliability and stability, consumers want fast & snazzy.
Personally, I like the fact that IBM machines won't even start the fan if the RAM is installed backwards, and that the BIOS reacts (stops and verifies with you) if the harddrive isn't present when it expects one. It's "doing things right" that slows a machine down. But, I don't own one... too expensive for what I need to do.
Aptiva's are IBM's answer to the "cheap" home PC market, and they never really learned how to clone a clone... still too much error checking, etc., and they underestimated the speed expectations of the home computer market. After all, they spend so much time designing things for their own internal use (being the largest IT company in the world), that they didn't understand the home market.
So, it's time for them to get out of the home PC business. Merging their "personal PC" division with their "business PC" division, and now dropping the retail channel are merely stepping stones.
I don't think they'll drop the Thinkpad line. Far too great a product (perception AND reality!)
Apparently, you don't have one of the Craptivas with the infamous MWave modem!!!!! I had to buy a 3Comm modem and a soundblaster sound card to run Red hat!!!
The point of the design was to make the machine look good for the home PC market, and let's face it, it did look cool. They were aiming the machine at trendy newbies who have no intention of ever running a proper OS on their slick new PC.
"The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
precisely. I had 6 PC300PL/GLs last year, and they held NT4 up longer than anything else. great components and they didn't die when the A/C did (unlike the gateway2K) In fact the only thing better was an RS6000 which crashed in June for the first time since 1995.
"The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
I've never had any problem getting support out of them for their high-end server products here in the UK. I've just had bad experiances obtaining desktop support.
I agree with you on the part numbering system though!
When I want a computer, usually I wanted it yesterday. I've bought both HP and IBM Aptivas, and of the pre-packaged computer choices, I find the Aptivas to be by far the best. They have nice big cases, they're easy to open, memory slots right in. And so far my systems have been very reliable.
/any/ components in common with an Aptiva. Aren't even the CPUs different?
On the other hand, the systems I buy are always the open box discounted units, so I daresay I haven't given IBM much in the way of profits from my purchases. The open box systems are significantly cheaper and still work great.
I will admit that it bugs me that they've cheaped out on the keyboard, but the last one I bought cost me less than $ 400. And at this very moment, it's running BeOS just fine.
I suppose they had to do something to cut off the bleeding of cash, but I wish they hadn't killed off retail sales entirely.
ThinkPads are the best - I'm using one that's almost three years old (running Linux), and I still love it. To the person who said that they would be doomed because "normal" PC sales support them, I'd like to say that I doubt it. I don't think my ThinkPad has
D
----
You want justification?
IBM is well aware that there's no money in assembling home computers, and that they don't have a particularly good image, and that their sales are very low. So, they merged their "personal" division with their "business" division, and there were 1,000 layoffs (overhead) in the proces.
That's business. That's good for profits, and therefore good for the price of stock. It is, after all, the stockholders that they report to, not the guy who buys a PC. You'll never survive in business selling things at a loss.
Layoffs don't always mean that times are tough, sometimes layoffs are GOOD for the company, they can now do more with fewer people! It's justified.
you forgot.... try getting it to work under win95 Doh!
No offense, but how is your problem relevant to the quality of the Aptivas?
From what you are describing I am deducting that OS2 sucks big time. I neither agree or dissagree (never used OS2) but don't blame it on the Aptivas. Aptivas are great computer, eventhough (maybe I should say: especially since) they are not made by IBM but by Acer.
Have you ever used an IBM-PC ? I say let the suckers DIE !!!
Uhhh...It was designed by a few ubergeeks. They were NeXT employess.
Has anyone noticed the similarities between the Aptiva and the NeXT cube? One of my floormates has it, and it looks a whole lot like my cube. There is a main unit that has no parts that the user would touch (at least on mine. Some have floppies and optical disks). The keyboard, mouse, monitor, and sound connect to the console which is connected to the base unit by a long tether.
In my mind, the stealth Aptiva is the consumer incarnation of the design of the NeXT cube. And they sure do look cool, don't they?
--
Max V.
There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
Max V.
NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
Most of you guys have missed what they did. IBM has teamed up with the 5th largest internet site. An e-commerce company with 30-40 million hits a day. It ran 'em clean out of their desktops. It may be worth noting here, that the site has only been up a month. Clue: IBM knows where the money is. Now, I have my gripes with a LOT about IBM, but hey- they know how to make money with this move. Guaranteed. Wanna find out more about that e-commerce company? More of us can profit by this instead of just BIG BLUE. E-mail me. -HQML@HOTMAIL.COM (Yes, hotmail.- on purpose. :) )
My dogma ran over your Karma....My Karma's a Greyhound: ugly, but strong. -You may think you know what, but I know who
IBM Aptivas used to come with those Mwave modems, which were probably the worst modems on earth, an ISP's tech support's nightmare. Then they got those LT winmodems which were better, but still can be a pain. Good ridance, Aptivas.
Customer: "I thought I was getting the best in the business when I purchased an IBM!"
-- queef
I think a few things need to be cleared up:
/.?
Aptivas have always been a high end, multimedia "gadget-focused" home system. They've never done well, retail-wise, outside of Radio Shack outlets. Just too expensive.
This is a move on their part to lower costs and to stop competing with sub-par personal computer manufacturers in the retail market...such as Packard Bell, NEC (same thing), and CTX.
This doesn't have ANYTHING to do with the IBM PC line, which is a line targeted at medium-large business desktops. We happen to use PC 300PLs here as a standard desktop, very reliable machines. They aren't going anywhere...they consistently get very high ratings in reviews and they'll continue to get high amounts of deployments in corporations.
I doubt you'll see a major shit in the next couple years in the way computers are sold, at least in regards to retail sales. The cheap CPU (AMD, Celery), cheap part vendors will continue to pump out machines to go onto those Best Buy, Staples, Circuit City and Officemax storeshelves. And people will continue to buy them because they're that stupid.
-witz
This is old news anyway, why's it on
Hey, does this mean that aptiva home PC I've got sitting in the corner of my basement is a collectors item now!?
:) (and that nifty stylish black two peiece model with the 'stealth' part that went under the monitor and held the floppy and cdrom.. oh come on, that HAD to be dreamed up by a uber-geek. :snicker:... even if it did make repairs a pain. :)
What about those old Ps/1s!?
I'm not sure how I feel about this overall.. it's not like there's not a million other 'box vendors' out there.. but kind of sad to see someone abandoning the market.... wonder who's next? I mean, yeah, IBM boxen have always been overpriced, but they *usually* had decent parts inside atleast.
Some chance. They are going to find themselves trying to play catchup with Dell (between their standard site and www.gigabuys.com they are trying to sew the online PC market up). This is IBM's way of saying "Fair enough. We've had enough". The economies of scale companies get from bulk-manufacture of PC's, as well as the clout they get in getting first-dibs on scarce parts (like RAM and LCD screens) mean that companies like IBM and Siemens that are trying to make money by flogging not-much-better-than-dell/compaq PCs, but charging a lot more, are going to get swept away. There is money to be made by selling PCs in retail, to morons that don't know better, but it's a shrinking market.
We've all been listening to people for years saying that the internet is the way of the future, but there's been little tangible evidence; the web has been viewed traditionally by businesses as a way of supplementing existing sales models rather than supplanting them.
"In the eyes of many people, this will mean that IBM is pretty much getting out of the consumer business"
Possibly. But it'll be interesting to see if this view still holds this time next year. Certainly if I were buying a laptop, I'd do it over the web. I imagine I'm not the only one.
Funny how IBM gets out of solid stores and goes to online only. Meanwhile Gateway (was it last year?) which was an internet (or phone) only store goes to having their own stores. ;).
The article said that IBM thought they had problems differentiating their product from the rest of the market and I can understand why. Mainly I think the three largest problems they had were 1)no good marketing, 2)badly trained sales people, 3)bad image.
1) Bad marketing - Common buy a cow you want a cow. And our boxes are waterproof! Only offering proof by contradiction here.
2) Sales people - they were selling the machines at Radio Hut. My god the few sales people I talked to there had such a hard time telling Apples from PCs. It was kinda frightening. The last sales person finally got rid of me by saying he liked the speakers and turning them up really loud.
3) Image - IBM still looked like a big business company. Not something for homw users. I mean Gateway saws that cows will be there to help me if I call
-cpd
I think this is mislabled. They seem to be just abandoning the brick-and-mortar, like everybody else, not pulling out of the market entirely.
fh
For the longest time, IBM has produced a sub-par PC and lived off of the fact that they have the bi9ggest name in the computer industry. Aptiva PC's are full of low-quality, entirely proprietary parts. Try getting the Aptiva with the SCSI-wannabe connector (the one that holds the CD-ROM drive and the floppy drive, as well as the power button, in a different box from everything else) to work in Linux. I'll bet a dollar to a dime it can't be done.
I have said many times that IBM is the worst computer manufacturer in the business because of this. Imagine if Linus sold his name to MS to be packaged with Windows! We'd freak! This couldn't be better!
Brad Johnson
Advisory Editor
Brad Johnson
This is by no means a good thing for those who aren't that exerienced in PC shopping, i.e. the typical family who heads off to Best Buy to pick up a computer. The article says that IBM had 10% of the home PC market, which isn't that great, but at least its a lot of people who aren't purchasing garbage machines like Compaq or *shudder* Packard Bell. Hopefully, they will reenter the retail market at some point (tip: lower prices a bit. That certainly couldn't hurt any...)
I realize that the story was skeptical, but IBM doesn't make decisions lightly. They make mistakes, sure, but carefully thought-out mistakes, and historically, they have made a lot of very good decisions.
Selling computers through the internet has a couple of advantages:
1. lower overhead (at least in theory)
2. presentation control
The first is obvious, but the second is, in my opinion, more crucial. The computer market has grown in complexity, and retail stores have not kept up. Sure, their are some bright people out there working at Best Buy and Circuit City, but for the most part these people, in my experience, are sorely in need of information.
Differentiation is vital to a company like IBM. They charge more for the "same" machine as some competitors, and therefore, they have to make the consumer aware of the IBM added value. With web sales, they can control and monitor the information made available to the consumer, and that is a real boon.
I don't know that this will really bring about the end of the (indirect) retail channel, but it wouldn't surprise me to see others follow suit. Look how well Dell and Gateway do, despite their products' premiums - they have primarily direct (that is, more controlled)-channel sales.
-Yoshi
However, I would have thought IBM would have clung to the PC market for longer than that... They did launch the whole PC trend in the early 1980's.
As it's been pointed out, the machines will continue to be available throughout the Internet, which means companies will still be able to honour that IBM-exclusive deal they signed. I have a feeling companies don't much care for performance, anyway...
Good news is, they're staying with the ThinkPads. These machines are slick! However, I can bet they won't stay competitive for very long... Producing laptops works much better when you're also making PCs. Give IBM a few years, and the ThinkPads will be gone as well.
"There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts."
"...less than two weeks after the division said it would eliminate as many as 1,000 employees..."
I think I'd consider that going overboard a little. What possible justification could this division have for killing 1,000 people? better yet, does this division have the authorization to decide that or did they have to go to the IBM head council? Regardless to the answers to these questions, IBM must be stopped at any cost.
They must have poured millions into their PC division.
They should have focused on the high end instead.
I wouldn't doubt that other companies that sell computer packages (such as Compaq) aren't doing as well as they used too either. It seems to me that as the general public becomes more and more computer literate, they are starting to have their computers cutom made by smaller computer stores. Which is the cheaper and better way to go. Even people who know nothing about computers often have a friend who can help them with this. I wouldn't doubt these larger companies begin to offer more customizable packages in the future, just to compete.
I wonder how long support for the Aptiva range is going to be provided by IBM after 1st Jan 2000. IMHO IBM have always been poor in their provision of support services for desktop machines.
Aptivas's are PS/1's :)
IBM have been selling the concept of E-Business being the way forward for a few months now. Are they finally taking their own advice after being thrashed by other manufactures in the online sales market?
Selling online is a good thing but for the forseable it will not be as popular to purchasing offline (is that the correct term?) because of the ability to touch, taste and smell your prospective purchase
Personally I feel that IBM are making a mistake by pulling out of stores - you can't beat the selling power of touch!
Is this a subtle way of telling us that the Aptiva range of machines aren't Y2K compliant?
Laptops have an element of "tell two friends, who tell two friends" to them -- I know 4 people who own VAIO's, three of whom bought them after playing with the early adopter's laptop ... retail outlets aren't the only (or best) place to touch and play with the hardware.
It's likely that I'm not the first to comment on this, but I have to point it out. The article claims that the IBM PC was the first popular personal computer... but it only came out in 1981, when the Apple II had already been around for a full 4 years.
When the Apple II was introduced at the First West Coast Computer Faire, it was an instant hit. It has been popular ever since, with fan pages all over the world. So I think it's fair to say that it was the first popular PC.
To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
Having worked as a tech, it was amazing how solid, reliable and just plain bad-ass the Thinkpads are..and then look at the cheezy desktops they put out. Everywhere I ever went that used Thinkpads avoided the desktops..
When I was in high school we setup a new Model 60 as a server. Had a whole pile of Model 25s (Mac like) and 30s as clients.
Up until 6 months ago I was still using a Model 70 (386/20). Great little box and must have been worth a small fortune new. I wanted to gut the components out of it and use the case for new stuff, but it just wasn't feasible. It started with the funky power supply and just got worse.
Still use my original AT keyboard though!
GRH
The consumer market always seemed to elude IBM. They should really get out of the desktop PC market altogether -- Craptivas were never really able to compete on cost or technical superiority, and liked to introduce bugs on top of the problems that already existed in Windows:
The Mwave was more evil than any Winmodem, although I think it actually had dedicated hardware (it had a DOS config utility). Hmm, do you want a sound card, a modem, or both? Take your pick, then go back to the utility before you start a game or get on the Internet...
IBM would do everyone a favor if they simply dropped the Craptiva line altogether. Radio Shack won't even sell the things anymore, and they peddled those crappy Tandy, then AST machines...
Radio Shack is the *only* game in town for computer supply in America's heartland. It's very simple out there -- among those with computers, the 'haves' own Compaqs, and the 'have nots' own IBMs. Radio Shack *used to* sell IBMs, now they sell Compaqs. It's as simple as that.
--
E2 IN2 IE?
IBM lost the war with PS/2. Ten years ago? No they're finally surrenduring.
IBM's sales losses on the Aptiva series have been about equal to the profits from the Thinkpad series. In these times when everyone is making PCs in their garage and selling them the name IBM doesn't mean much compared to the significant price difference.
They've always made their sales based on superior technical service, but it seems that recently no one is mentioning about that. I recently went into a major computer store (that shall remain anonymous) and pretended to no little about PCs in order to ask the dumb/fun questions. The salesperson showed me the IBMs they had in stock first. When I asked what all I would be getting for that price He immediately moved me over to the e-machine-like PCs, never mentioning why IBMs cost more.
I can't say I didn't see this move coming. You dont stay the biggest name in the computer industry by losing millions a year when you dont have to do so.
Devil Ducky
MY peers would get out of jury duty.
I mean, please. Phrases like "helped usher in the computer revolution nearly two decades ago" or "the market that it helped spark" could have just been cut and pasted from IBM's press release. (Or one of Apple's for that matter...)
Amazing that even though Microsoft directs the future of PCs more than any other single company, IBM still means "personal computer" to the average reporter. Then again, these are the same people who can't get the difference between hacker and cracker straingt in their heads.
I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
YIPPEEEEEEEE!!! You mean no more calls to IBM tech support that begins with you dialing some 800 number, getting a human after 30 minutes listening to IBM propaganda, being told to call another number, more propaganda, being told to call the FIRST number you called, hanging up in frustration and wondering just where in the hell the last 90 minutes went??? Oh, wait... they didn't say they were going to stop selling AS/400's. *grin*
--bc
--------------------------
the amazing bc
just another guy doing IT
webnaut, music junkie, holes-in-head
Fewer Craptiva machines on the market means fewer headaches for techs trying to get them to work with the standard software installs that work on nearly every other machine out there.
All manufactured PC's these days are crummy, but IBM's have the most proprietary crap (although Compaqs are a close second). Packard Bell makes them both look bad!
I can only hope that someday the average consumer will start taking a hard look at exactly what sorts of parts make up the PC's they are looking at in Best Try and Circuit Shitty.
Right now I just tell anybody who asks that if they want a decent PC they either need to build it themselves or find somebody they trust to build it for them. Sure, they still might end up with a dodgy machine built by some sleazy Mom & Pop but at least it won't be full of proprietary parts.
The traditional way of selling computers through resellers is going to eventually go by the wayside. There are just too many advantages of the "Direct Model". Michael Dell really hit on the right idea and has made it the basis of Dell. Other "legacy" companies are having a hard time cutting out the middle man they so firmly entrenched, and are, I'm sure, regretting their dependency on the current infrastructure. Dell is exploding in Canada right now, and doing very well in the US. Why? Because we^H^Hthey are sticking with off the shelf parts, off the shelf software, direct sales, direct support, and outsourcing the services portion of the business to multiple companies. IBM can only hope to have that kind of approach. There's too much cruft in IBM's business model to make it lean enough to compete with the direct sales of Dell. They realize that, though, and that's where the 9 billion deal for parts came from. There's a lot of room for companies to make money from Dell's success, and it looks like IBM is realizing that. They have to, or course, keep a hand in the market if just to keep up appearances, though.
Okay, end of commercial.
The reason why I personally feel Aptiva's suck it the simple fact that I owned one for 1 weekend and that was the 1st and last time I ever owned an IBM desktop computer; it was allmost 2 years ago (end '97 / begin '98) and I was, next to Linux, pretty deep into OS/2. Heck; I mainly choose the Aptiva (could buy it from work so I got a bit cheaper) because I was very hooked on OS/2. Everything went fine in the beginning; I just bought myself Tombraider II and was looking forward to play around a bit that same friday evening.
The horror immediatly struck me; Lara turned white at a resolution of 800x600:32! The videocard was an ATI Rage 3d (pro I believe). I figured it was just the game and started partitioning. I wanted; win95, WinNT, OS/2 and a little part for Linux.
That was the beginning & the end of that first weekend in '98 for me and I'm still pissed by it. I downloaded all the OS/2 drivers I needed for the Aptiva I got but at the very beginning OS/2 refused to partition my harddisk! Wasn't supported. So I called the helpdesk and they pointed me to another driver. Didn't do it. 3 different drivers later it sorta worked; I got OS/2 finally installed. And then my sound didn't work, my video was totally crap (640x480:16), and I kept getting harddisk errors from time to time.
I'm pretty sure I spend over 2 - 4 hours in calling the helpdesk (and believe me; I'm not that demanding but I did want to see the IBM computer I bought working with IBM's OS) and finally we came to the conclusion that this computer wasn't capable in running OS/2 which still eludes the helpdesk operator (we kept in touch) and myself. Fortunatly I could get my money back and later I decided to buy all the different parts I needed & assemble the PC myself and up until now I'm very happy with it. It even ran Tomb Raider II happily in 1024x768:32.
But if this is the sort of PC IBM delivered back then (and I heard more stories from people who also share these experiences) then I feel it sucks. You pay more for the IBM brand and then I expect an IBM software product to run. Not some Win95/98 OS because allmost every PC can run that sort of thing. I refuse to spend some 1500 Dutch Guilders extra just because a PC has the IBM name on it. After reading this article I guess more people felt the same way.
However; if the Aptiva dissapears then it doesn't have to result in IBM leaving the consumers market. They can allways come up with a new line which should be far more easy for them to accomplish these days; Major contestants are Win9x, WinNT (which will surely run on an Aptiva based machine) and Linux. I'm sure those will run on some 'Aptiva-2' line.
IBM isn't exiting the PC business nor is it exiting all of the channels to sell them. It's exiting the on-site retail storefront distribution channel for low end consumer PCs like Aptivas. The higher models like the Intellistations, Netfinity servers and the like will still be sold the way they were before and Aptivas will be sold direct. Moreover who wants an $800 PC with custom hardware, MWave modems, special drivers, custome form factors and the like? If they want to go grey box then that's what they should do.
Compaq make reliable computers with few hard failures? where do you work, i want to come there. I work as a pc technician at a major computer superstore and better than 60% of the pcs we repair are compaqs. more often than not its cheaper to give them a cheap unit off the shelf then repair the broken parts.
1: They were the first machines ever from a major manufacturer that OEMed the AMD Athlon.
2: They are NOT actually IBM machines. The actual machines are built by the Taiwanese computer company Acer. In fact, the mainboards on Acer machines and Aptivas are nearly idenitcal.
3: IBM makes them with mostly AMD chips. But they used to own Intel. And at one point they manufactured Cyrix chips. And they also invented and make the x86 competitor PowerPC...
4: Even though IBM supports Red Hat Linux with free tech support, and has put like half a bullion into their Linux division, the Aptivas still don't run Linux very well.
5: IBM never pre-installed OS/2 on an Aptiva...even though they invented it.
Okay sorry, i had to say all that....
Back in 1996, I had the privledge of working for IBM Canada's K-12 Educational devision. Many an internal memo was circulated that, "Aptiva's were soon to be gonners." We even got large discounts on them. This Aptiva death watch has gone on since then. I am willing to bet that Aptiva gets recycled and resurected into the retail channel, sometime soon. docGui
I doubt this means as much as people think. I suspect that IBM sells far more PCs to businesses then through the retail market. There are still a lot of managers out there (usually with "VP" in their title) who still remember the old adage "no one ever got fired for buying IBM". They tend to buy PCs in lots of 100 or 1000.
Because of this, I've used a number of IBM PCs. Some sucked rocks, others were really nice. I actually have an odd affection for the old original microchannel line. Those machines were solid as a rock and could be disassembled with a quarter.
It is so sad when computers go obsolete. The day after I started at my first real job, the head programmer got an IBM Model 80 (a 25 Mhz 386). I remember feeling incredibly jealous. Just a few months ago, I worked for a company that was finally putting 150 of them out of service. They are only so much junk, now. sigh...
The cake is a pie
The PC division at IBM has been a major impediment to progress in the company for a long time. This is a Bad Thing (TM), and their misfortunes are deserved and long overdue.
...) at least for the basic entry applications. And the emergence of Java versions of apps would increase this enormously. I would really love to see if they have the balls to take what is a comparatively modest market risk to push the PPC into a new market.
Seriously, the PC division has a long history of temper tantrums and major FUD against changes in the other divisions of IBM which would have had a negative impact on the PC division. I.e., they blocked the plans of the workstation division to be a part of a port of Windows to the PPC chip, which would have meant another division of IBM would have been competing with them (with a 30% faster product than they or any of the Intel based competition had). You may not like Windows, but as a marketing decision this would probably have meant that IBM would have doubled or tripled its market share in the business desktop world, rather than dwindling off to pitiful. I have friends in the IBM workstation division who understood this 5 or 6 years ago, and the corporate management may have an inkling of this, but the managers of the PC division had such a snit fit over the issue, that in the interest of avoiding acrimony the PC division was allowed to prevail.
Everybody on the planet has known for a long, long time that IBM PC's were much more expensive, much slower, and way the hell too much time was spent making them bulletproof. Meanwhile, along came Compaq and Dell, and others likewise capable of making a reliable computer (very very few hard fails) that gave better performance for a lot less money. They have been on the road to hell for a decade (at least), and good ridance!
I think IBM will become a better company on the desktop in the future, and it will be interesting to see if they can do anything with the PPC now that the PC division has been cut down to its proper place. It is still a better hardware technology than anything else on the planet, and it will be interesting to see if they can think of anything to compete with Apple, and if the present political situation within IBM will allow them to do anything. Hopefully, they will be bold--hell, for what is comparatively pocket change for them, they could market a Linux PPC or a FreeBSD-ish system, and by the time they brought it to market in a year or so there will be business applications (Corel Office, Star Office,
One of the boldest and best moves of all would be for them to **give** Linux or FreeBSD a journaling file system (maybe, just adccidentally compatible with the AIX journaling file system).
Look, the market doesn't have preferences much different from your own: sometimes you want something right away so you go to a retail store next door, and other times you think you might be returning it soon so you go to a retail store next door, and sometimes you think you'll need post-sales in-person support so you go to the retail store next door, and the rest of the time you like the quiet, low-cost, efficiency of the giant mail-order places so you order from them.
Sometimes you use the phone to call your vendors, sometimes you'll use the web, and sometimes you'll use "sneaker-net" and walk over there.
And, yep, web will allow more virtual reality inspection of products in the future, and will enable complex retail relationships where you order centrally nationally customizedforyouably and the computer will get delivered with your Peapod/HomeRuns/Whatever grocery service.
Various retail channels will change, but they're all pretty much here to stay.
Here's how it played out in my shop:
Guy comes in and wants the latest software on his brand new, helped-him-take-it-out-of-the-box Aptiva yesterday. Put MS office 97 on it, McAfee's virus scanner... Then I started playing around with it, looking at what it shipped with. Cool, 96MB RAM. Oh, look, a CD burner! I looked, and looked, and looked...
There was no software to support a CD burner. At all.
IBM is pulling out? I'm really not surprised.
Computers can only simulate determinism. ~Hermetic.
I have found that most of the consumer pc's really stink. Compacs and IBMs always have junk keyboards with funky xtra buttons. The HP Brio \ key doesn't work when you boot into DOS mode! Add to that a bunch of lousy programs that nobody uses... I like the e-machines because they are cheap and they don't come with any stupid extras that really just make the computer more complicated.