So... stupid fucking conservatives try their best to destroy unions, and turn states into at-will-employment states, THEN when some inbred idiot gets fired for being an inbred idiot in that at-will-employment state... you bitch like little fucking children. Conservatives, more than anyone else, made firings like this possible. Want some cheese with your whine?
if the right wing neo-nazi fascist wannabe's didn't post some conservative propaganda or lies. I guess last last weeks posting of a verified lie and conspiracy theory by Nunes didn't prompt "mi" to give a long hard look to his complete lack of morality or ethics.
15,000 killed in one day by wave when the Fukushima plant failed.
It is called context.
Not a single fucking person died at Fukushima because of an accident in the wave energy production industry. Pompeii wasn't an accident in the geothermal industry, hurricane Katrina wasn't an accident in the wind energy industry, and the Carrington Event wasn't an accident in the solar energy industry.... and a fucking tsunami isn't an accident in the wave energy industry, no matter how much of a fucking imbecile you are. YOU are the dipshit that said it.
As for grab-them-by-the-pussy-Trump, fuck him and all the anti-American, anti-christain, fascist neo-nazi pieces of shit that voted for him.
And? Hydro-electric dams are not wind, solar, or wave. Hydro energy production is about on par with solar, wind and thermal (our wave energy production is basically nil) as of 2008, the difference in them being: solar and wind are growing, fast... hydro not so much. Wave....well...we have a huge amount of available area's for it, and apparently no balls to actually do it. It's like a lot of things currently, we've ceded it to some other country because we have idiots in charge, and too many people thinking that being smart is somehow a bad thing.
Using wave/currents to produce energy is not the same as a fucking tsunami. People care about those deaths, but only really fucking stupid people think wave energy https://www.boem.gov/Ocean-Wav... and tsunami are the same thing.
Are you simply trying to distract from the conversation by bringing up other disasters? Bhopal had nothing to do with energy production, via wave, solar, wind, or nuclear. Maybe we could bring up the 2004 tsunami in SE Asia too? I mean, it at least has the word "wave" involved in it.... and if you're really fucking stupid, you might conflate that with the production of energy via wave/current... but you'd have to be really fucking stupid to do that...again...
Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse, or simply too fucking stupid to understand the question. A tsunami created by an earthquake doesn't equal electrical power generation using waves/ocean currents... it's a random fucking act of nature. Jesus, you people need to start using that mass of grey matter in your head for something other than keeping your ears apart.
How many people died from Chernobyl and Fukushima? How many suffered irreparable damage from radiation exposure? How many generations will that damage propagate? Now how about animals, plants, the biosphere around those areas?
You're conflating "carbon-free" with clean. Done "safely" apparently means having a level 7 or higher event once every 20 years or so.
As for all the problems being solved by simply a different reactor design, i suppose if unicorns shit energy that'd solve the problem as well. IF that was all it took, THAT would have already been done. Anyone telling you something will burn all it's fuel is outright lying to you... if it's not economically feasible, it ain't going to happen... which is WHY they remove fuel rods with so much full left in them: MONEY.
Strontium-90 and cesium-137 have half-lives of about 30 years (half the radioactivity will decay in 30 years). Plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24,000 years.
Of course if the strontium gives you bone cancer or leukemia, your own biological half-life is substantially shorter. Then again, the cesium will kill you faster... so i guess the moral is: hope for just bone cancer. And that 24,000 years on Pu still doesn't make it safe.
I still don't know what the fixation with coal is. Yes, coal is very bad.... worse than nuclear. But, nuclear isn't "clean." Peoples attempts to minimize what damage it can cause, AND HAS CAUSED, makes me think they're fucking idiots... fucking idiots that need to take a remedial high school chemistry class to bone up on basic fucking knowledge.
Tell yah what though.... i'll stand here on my little piece of ground with all that thorium and uranium present, and you go over to Hanford and climb into one of their spent fuel pools, and let me know which of us got the better of the deal. That's rhetorical because you won't fucking be able to.... in short order you'll be a puddle of biological material even your dentist won't be able to identify.
Nuclear facilities ONLY in the US that require cleaning up cover a land area roughly the size of Rhode Island. br>
What is remarkable is that anyone with any common sense at all would compare a plane crash, or even multiple plane crashes, who's long term effect may well be only the loss of several hundreds of lives, with a single, or multiple nuclear accidents that literally contaminate vast area's for thousands of years, as well as cause untold death and biological mutations across the full spectrum of a given biome. One is a single time, mass casualty.... the other, the potential for destruction for LITERALLY thousands of years to come.
If you can see the long term effects of nuclear, and are one of these people who keep claiming nuclear is clean... well, it's simple: you're a fucking idiot. If it was clean, the Hanford site wouldn't even exist.
As the AC below mentioned, i'd rather have the feds make a list of preferred and worthwhile treatments to be used, rather than have a private company WHO HAS A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO DENY YOUR TREATMENT SO THEY CAN MAKE MONEY OFF OF YOUR DEATH.
Seriously... have you not paid attention to anything, ever?
There are no right-wing christians... you can't be conservative and be christian, the teachings of Jesus are diametrically opposed to conservative thinking in the US. What you have is a bunch of fakes abusing the name of Christ so they can have the social standing coming from the name.
No, it needs to be modded "just doesn't get it." Single payer has absolutely nothing to do with the care you get... only how it is paid for. By going single payer, it does remove all the "beancounters" he's complaining about.... as well as the vast majorities of other "overhead" that the private insurance industry has in abundance, including "profit" and "shareholder costs."
Additionally, the poster should get a "are you fucking clueless" mod for seemingly not having an inkling of how insurance works. The larger the insurance pool, the lower the average costs... and while it may be more for some, it's an overall lower average because of minimized overhead and implementation costs. While he may not want to pay for "maternity" related things being a guy, how's he going to feel when he gets testicle cancer and no one wants to pay for it, opting to just let his nuts fall off before dying? With everyone in one single cost pool, you minimize the cost while protecting everyone.
Perhaps he should just be modded "self-centered, myopic, and clueless."
In 1999, after years of research and study, Sweden passed legislation that a) criminalizes the buying of sex, and b) decriminalizes the selling of sex. The novel rationale behind this legislation is clearly stated in the government's literature on the law:
"In Sweden prostitution is regarded as an aspect of male violence against women and children. It is officially acknowledged as a form of exploitation of women and children and constitutes a significant social problem... gender equality will remain unattainable so long as men buy, sell and exploit women and children by prostituting them."
The problem (or rather, another problem) here in the US is that there's too many people who still consider women to be less than a person.
Yeh, let the anti-government fucks lose all their money to one of these unregulated con-jobs, then see what they say. These idiots aren't libertarians... they're just idiots.
As a vet, the ONLY thing i gave a shit about in a foxhole was the guy next to me could fucking shoot. These piece of shits like Trump are worthless dickwads who have never served this country a day in their life.
Slashdot Mirror
Shh... the whiny little conservatives need to keep playing their victim card.
You can be fired by a company for causing shit in the workplace... but nice strawman, dipshit.
So... stupid fucking conservatives try their best to destroy unions, and turn states into at-will-employment states, THEN when some inbred idiot gets fired for being an inbred idiot in that at-will-employment state... you bitch like little fucking children. Conservatives, more than anyone else, made firings like this possible. Want some cheese with your whine?
if the right wing neo-nazi fascist wannabe's didn't post some conservative propaganda or lies. I guess last last weeks posting of a verified lie and conspiracy theory by Nunes didn't prompt "mi" to give a long hard look to his complete lack of morality or ethics.
Why is it conservatives lie so fucking much?
Settings > Apps > tap the app (App info) > Advanced > Modify system settings > uncheck the Allow. That will disallow the app from enabling your WiFi.
Almost correct, it's actually: Settings > Apps > tap the app (App info) > Advanced > Modify system settings > uncheck the SkynetLaunchJudgmentDay.
15,000 killed in one day by wave when the Fukushima plant failed.
It is called context.
Not a single fucking person died at Fukushima because of an accident in the wave energy production industry. Pompeii wasn't an accident in the geothermal industry, hurricane Katrina wasn't an accident in the wind energy industry, and the Carrington Event wasn't an accident in the solar energy industry.... and a fucking tsunami isn't an accident in the wave energy industry, no matter how much of a fucking imbecile you are. YOU are the dipshit that said it.
As for grab-them-by-the-pussy-Trump, fuck him and all the anti-American, anti-christain, fascist neo-nazi pieces of shit that voted for him.
And? Hydro-electric dams are not wind, solar, or wave. Hydro energy production is about on par with solar, wind and thermal (our wave energy production is basically nil) as of 2008, the difference in them being: solar and wind are growing, fast... hydro not so much. Wave....well...we have a huge amount of available area's for it, and apparently no balls to actually do it. It's like a lot of things currently, we've ceded it to some other country because we have idiots in charge, and too many people thinking that being smart is somehow a bad thing.
Using wave/currents to produce energy is not the same as a fucking tsunami. People care about those deaths, but only really fucking stupid people think wave energy https://www.boem.gov/Ocean-Wav... and tsunami are the same thing.
Are you simply trying to distract from the conversation by bringing up other disasters? Bhopal had nothing to do with energy production, via wave, solar, wind, or nuclear. Maybe we could bring up the 2004 tsunami in SE Asia too? I mean, it at least has the word "wave" involved in it.... and if you're really fucking stupid, you might conflate that with the production of energy via wave/current... but you'd have to be really fucking stupid to do that...again...
Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse, or simply too fucking stupid to understand the question. A tsunami created by an earthquake doesn't equal electrical power generation using waves/ocean currents... it's a random fucking act of nature. Jesus, you people need to start using that mass of grey matter in your head for something other than keeping your ears apart.
https://www.boem.gov/Ocean-Wav...
You're conflating "carbon-free" with clean. Done "safely" apparently means having a level 7 or higher event once every 20 years or so.
As for all the problems being solved by simply a different reactor design, i suppose if unicorns shit energy that'd solve the problem as well. IF that was all it took, THAT would have already been done. Anyone telling you something will burn all it's fuel is outright lying to you... if it's not economically feasible, it ain't going to happen... which is WHY they remove fuel rods with so much full left in them: MONEY.
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm...
Strontium-90 and cesium-137 have half-lives of about 30 years (half the radioactivity will decay in 30 years). Plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24,000 years.
Of course if the strontium gives you bone cancer or leukemia, your own biological half-life is substantially shorter. Then again, the cesium will kill you faster... so i guess the moral is: hope for just bone cancer. And that 24,000 years on Pu still doesn't make it safe.
I still don't know what the fixation with coal is. Yes, coal is very bad.... worse than nuclear. But, nuclear isn't "clean." Peoples attempts to minimize what damage it can cause, AND HAS CAUSED, makes me think they're fucking idiots... fucking idiots that need to take a remedial high school chemistry class to bone up on basic fucking knowledge.
Tell yah what though.... i'll stand here on my little piece of ground with all that thorium and uranium present, and you go over to Hanford and climb into one of their spent fuel pools, and let me know which of us got the better of the deal. That's rhetorical because you won't fucking be able to.... in short order you'll be a puddle of biological material even your dentist won't be able to identify.
How many have died from solar, wind, or wave?
Nuclear facilities ONLY in the US that require cleaning up cover a land area roughly the size of Rhode Island.
br> What is remarkable is that anyone with any common sense at all would compare a plane crash, or even multiple plane crashes, who's long term effect may well be only the loss of several hundreds of lives, with a single, or multiple nuclear accidents that literally contaminate vast area's for thousands of years, as well as cause untold death and biological mutations across the full spectrum of a given biome. One is a single time, mass casualty.... the other, the potential for destruction for LITERALLY thousands of years to come.
If you can see the long term effects of nuclear, and are one of these people who keep claiming nuclear is clean... well, it's simple: you're a fucking idiot. If it was clean, the Hanford site wouldn't even exist.
I bet these workers are so incredibly glad nuclear power is such a clean source of energy.
As the AC below mentioned, i'd rather have the feds make a list of preferred and worthwhile treatments to be used, rather than have a private company WHO HAS A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO DENY YOUR TREATMENT SO THEY CAN MAKE MONEY OFF OF YOUR DEATH.
Seriously... have you not paid attention to anything, ever?
All they're doing is adding mauve to the palette.
I've seen that movie.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...
There are no right-wing christians... you can't be conservative and be christian, the teachings of Jesus are diametrically opposed to conservative thinking in the US. What you have is a bunch of fakes abusing the name of Christ so they can have the social standing coming from the name.
No, it needs to be modded "just doesn't get it." Single payer has absolutely nothing to do with the care you get... only how it is paid for. By going single payer, it does remove all the "beancounters" he's complaining about.... as well as the vast majorities of other "overhead" that the private insurance industry has in abundance, including "profit" and "shareholder costs."
Additionally, the poster should get a "are you fucking clueless" mod for seemingly not having an inkling of how insurance works. The larger the insurance pool, the lower the average costs... and while it may be more for some, it's an overall lower average because of minimized overhead and implementation costs. While he may not want to pay for "maternity" related things being a guy, how's he going to feel when he gets testicle cancer and no one wants to pay for it, opting to just let his nuts fall off before dying? With everyone in one single cost pool, you minimize the cost while protecting everyone.
Perhaps he should just be modded "self-centered, myopic, and clueless."
In 1999, after years of research and study, Sweden passed legislation that a) criminalizes the buying of sex, and b) decriminalizes the selling of sex. The novel rationale behind this legislation is clearly stated in the government's literature on the law:
"In Sweden prostitution is regarded as an aspect of male violence against women and children. It is officially acknowledged as a form of exploitation of women and children and constitutes a significant social problem... gender equality will remain unattainable so long as men buy, sell and exploit women and children by prostituting them."
The problem (or rather, another problem) here in the US is that there's too many people who still consider women to be less than a person.
Awwww,,,, no, i'm sorry. You'll have to find Rick Santorum and his dog to fulfill your fantasies.
Can it make a cup of Earl Grey?
It comes in tartan or paisley.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/...
Nunes is a bigger lying piece of shit than even "mi" is, and that's saying an lot.
Yeh, let the anti-government fucks lose all their money to one of these unregulated con-jobs, then see what they say. These idiots aren't libertarians... they're just idiots.
As a vet, the ONLY thing i gave a shit about in a foxhole was the guy next to me could fucking shoot. These piece of shits like Trump are worthless dickwads who have never served this country a day in their life.