It should read "Detective Derrick and his rat partners cost just eight pounds on the head each and are capable of being trained to...". Because while rats don't care about money, they dislike being pounded on the head a lot.
we'd just be better at identifying molecules flying around in the air
Which is the goal, ultimately. At least when used to detect drugs, explosives or other illegal substances. So even if it were easier to identify molecules flying around in the air than it is to build a smelling machine, it's easier still to use smelling animals.
Wait. Let me think. If you have a wife to dump and you're homosexual, doesn't that make you a lesbian? But then... Natalie Portman! I sure wish I was lesbian... Alas, 7-digit SlashID (but *almost* 6-digit...)
America didn't overthrow the German government. They just helped kicking them out of the countries they invaded. Entirely different. And they were actively dragged into WW2 (Pearl Harbor). So please quit childishly replacing words. It doesn't make you look smarter.
You're completely right. Obviously we should beat up the bickering children so that, at least, they'll have a common enemy. Having something in common is always nice.
most people when they say "wireless" means not attached to a power cable
This article is about wired vs wireless *networking*. But I suspect power cabling is an issue as well. Otherwise they could just do Ethernet over Power (EoP, aka Power line communication).
Okay, so you like interest-based ads. I can see that, I really can. What I'm afraid of, though, is that you with your interest and I with mine get presented a different internet. Google probably sorts your search results differently than mine, so you'll visit different sites than I do, even though our search terms are the same.
Maybe this isn't a big deal. Your perception of the world is different than mine, so why wouldn't you visit a different internet than I do? But where do you draw the line? (right back at ya:) )
Also, my interests are shaped based on what I see and read on the internet (as well as IRL of course), but if only pages/search results based on my current interests are ever presented, can I ever widen my horizon? I'm not a static set of properties.
Okay, so it probably isn't this bad yet, but I'm a little worried about where this is going. Thanks in any case for your view on this.
Hmm, I take it back. Given a proper random test and control groups, causality could be proved or disproved. I wasn't thinking when I wrote my previous post.
Even double blind studies only find correlations. That is, even if this had been double blind and the same results been found, no conclusion whatsoever could have been drawn.
Being responsive to customer needs doesn't mean you have to do everything they say. Most of the time, though, a customer doesn't really 'need' as much as they pretend they do. And most of the time, if your increments are small enough, this isn't a big problem.
Precisely. That way, you can still live up to being 'agile' (which doesn't mean you can jump through hoops). Bits of work (sprint, iteration, whatever) being worked on cannot be changed in mid-air.
Umm.. isn't it impossible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level?
Lets cancel out some negatives here:
Is it possible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level? Is it possible to have land that is higher than sea level? Why yes, that's entirely possible!
Slashdot Mirror
Or at least a viable nutrient for the Korean population.
It should read "Detective Derrick and his rat partners cost just eight pounds on the head each and are capable of being trained to...". Because while rats don't care about money, they dislike being pounded on the head a lot.
we'd just be better at identifying molecules flying around in the air
Which is the goal, ultimately. At least when used to detect drugs, explosives or other illegal substances. So even if it were easier to identify molecules flying around in the air than it is to build a smelling machine, it's easier still to use smelling animals.
+1 informative
For the same reason you shouldn't pay a programmer by lines of code.
I wonder what you mean by the "care" part of "child production/care". Genitalia are rarely needed in child care.
I heard you like monitors, so I've rendered some monitors on your monitors so you can monitor while you monitor.
Wait. Let me think. If you have a wife to dump and you're homosexual, doesn't that make you a lesbian? But then... Natalie Portman!
I sure wish I was lesbian... Alas, 7-digit SlashID (but *almost* 6-digit...)
I'm going to to this as well, but I'll wait for my kids to become adolescents first. It's just more fun that way!
No, for being rude. Idiot.
America didn't overthrow the German government. They just helped kicking them out of the countries they invaded. Entirely different. And they were actively dragged into WW2 (Pearl Harbor). So please quit childishly replacing words. It doesn't make you look smarter.
You're completely right. Obviously we should beat up the bickering children so that, at least, they'll have a common enemy. Having something in common is always nice.
Yes, I noticed that too. I guess they're exaggerating the problem to make their solution look better?
This article is about wired vs wireless *networking*. But I suspect power cabling is an issue as well. Otherwise they could just do Ethernet over Power (EoP, aka Power line communication).
True. True.
It's easy to be a philanthropist when you're rich. Just sayin'
Okay, so you like interest-based ads. I can see that, I really can. What I'm afraid of, though, is that you with your interest and I with mine get presented a different internet. Google probably sorts your search results differently than mine, so you'll visit different sites than I do, even though our search terms are the same. :) )
Maybe this isn't a big deal. Your perception of the world is different than mine, so why wouldn't you visit a different internet than I do? But where do you draw the line? (right back at ya
Also, my interests are shaped based on what I see and read on the internet (as well as IRL of course), but if only pages/search results based on my current interests are ever presented, can I ever widen my horizon? I'm not a static set of properties.
Okay, so it probably isn't this bad yet, but I'm a little worried about where this is going.
Thanks in any case for your view on this.
Hmm, I take it back. Given a proper random test and control groups, causality could be proved or disproved. I wasn't thinking when I wrote my previous post.
Even double blind studies only find correlations. That is, even if this had been double blind and the same results been found, no conclusion whatsoever could have been drawn.
I'm sure he meant DirectX. But still funny :)
Being responsive to customer needs doesn't mean you have to do everything they say. Most of the time, though, a customer doesn't really 'need' as much as they pretend they do. And most of the time, if your increments are small enough, this isn't a big problem.
Just getting through these steps is already going to delay the release?
Precisely. That way, you can still live up to being 'agile' (which doesn't mean you can jump through hoops). Bits of work (sprint, iteration, whatever) being worked on cannot be changed in mid-air.
Umm.. isn't it impossible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level?
Lets cancel out some negatives here: Is it possible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level? Is it possible to have land that is higher than sea level? Why yes, that's entirely possible!
Just the iAlphabet: iA, iB, iC, iD, iEtc...