Whoever tagged this put "rupertmurdoch", who has nothing to do with the BBC. One of his companies, BSkyB, already has a on-demand service that uses Microsoft's DRM. Channel 4 also use Microsoft DRM.
I wonder why the OSC hasn't hit them also. Or is this strictly BBC because it breaks their Royal Charter?
What ever happened to BBC research and development division? It seems the BBC do not innovate/invent in any way these days. BBC should come up with some sort of system that is open to all, and has some sort of DRM, not use a Microsoft product that is close to everyone apart from Windows XP users who use Internet Explorer.
It's not just he ~10% of none Windows users they are leaving out, but the other 20-25% that use alternative web browsers.
In the UK this would be covered by a license from the PRS, along with any other live music.
Just playing radio is quite cheap (cost £14 a year for the last shop I worked for). You also have to have the PRS logo on show.0
A venue that is owned by my dad has a PRS which covers live sound. License isn't expensive, all we have to do is ask for a list of the set played. PRS can ask for it at any time. The list just helps to where the revenue money should go. Agadoo song must get a lot of royalty pay in the UK.
The labels and publishers deserve their money. Quite right you should pay for the license.
Well, Safari is native Cocoa with Windows. Cocoa has been ported to Windows under project Dharma. We have known that Safari will be ported to Windows since 2005.
Also forgot that on Apple laptops, if you have your finger on the trackpad and click, it invokes a right click.
hold the right and click the left. But that's just retarded.
I go to http://www.tic.ac.uk/ (Technology Innovation Centre) in Birmingham, UK. They have a RedHat an Sun Academy for Linux training. It's also the central training centre for CISCO for the world apart except the Americas.
Everyone is missing one major point here - Nobody gets any money from AllofMP3. They keep 100% of the revenue. The labels and publishers do not get a single penny from them. In turn, the poor musicians and publishers get nothing back for the song they made. The IFPI, RIAA or BPI for example should win here, as the poor person, whether they are very good or dismally bad will not get money for their work.
Check out http://www.pro-music.org/ , it lists all legal places to buy digital music on the web. It's also run by the IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries).
Slashdot Mirror
Whoever tagged this put "rupertmurdoch", who has nothing to do with the BBC. One of his companies, BSkyB, already has a on-demand service that uses Microsoft's DRM. Channel 4 also use Microsoft DRM.
I wonder why the OSC hasn't hit them also. Or is this strictly BBC because it breaks their Royal Charter?
What ever happened to BBC research and development division? It seems the BBC do not innovate/invent in any way these days. BBC should come up with some sort of system that is open to all, and has some sort of DRM, not use a Microsoft product that is close to everyone apart from Windows XP users who use Internet Explorer.
It's not just he ~10% of none Windows users they are leaving out, but the other 20-25% that use alternative web browsers.
In the UK this would be covered by a license from the PRS, along with any other live music. Just playing radio is quite cheap (cost £14 a year for the last shop I worked for). You also have to have the PRS logo on show.0 A venue that is owned by my dad has a PRS which covers live sound. License isn't expensive, all we have to do is ask for a list of the set played. PRS can ask for it at any time. The list just helps to where the revenue money should go. Agadoo song must get a lot of royalty pay in the UK. The labels and publishers deserve their money. Quite right you should pay for the license.
Well, Safari is native Cocoa with Windows. Cocoa has been ported to Windows under project Dharma. We have known that Safari will be ported to Windows since 2005.
y ellow-box-on-windows-again/
http://www.macrumors.com/2005/12/07/dharma-cocoa-
Wow this is "new". I have seen students make such systems using Max/MSP with a projector under tables and sensors to know what you're touching.
I have also seen this product show years ago at CEDIA expos.
Yawn!
I can't see Apple not having a fight over this. They own both patents for multi-touch and touch gestures. Someone please dig out the patents.
Well, a lot of these "tweaks" will have negative effects.
Example: nglayout.initialpaint.delay as 0. This will slow rendering of the page as it causes reflows. Fools.
I go to http://www.tic.ac.uk/ (Technology Innovation Centre) in Birmingham, UK. They have a RedHat an Sun Academy for Linux training. It's also the central training centre for CISCO for the world apart except the Americas.
Everyone is missing one major point here - Nobody gets any money from AllofMP3. They keep 100% of the revenue. The labels and publishers do not get a single penny from them. In turn, the poor musicians and publishers get nothing back for the song they made. The IFPI, RIAA or BPI for example should win here, as the poor person, whether they are very good or dismally bad will not get money for their work.
Check out http://www.pro-music.org/ , it lists all legal places to buy digital music on the web. It's also run by the IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries).
Something linking to good old Acorn Computers and RISCOS. Still have a few Acorns knocking around.
As a sound engineer that made me laugh. Next is the stuck up bassiest.
I think it will be fair to say, wait till Tuesday.