Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display

longacre writes "Popular Mechanics takes the Microsoft Surface system for a hands-on video test drive. To be announced at today's D5 conference, the coffee-table-esqe device allows manipulation from multiple touch points, while infrared, WiFi and Bluetooth team up to allow wireless transfers between devices placed on top of it, such as cameras and cell phones. Expected to launch before the end of the year in the $5,000-$10,000 range, the devices might not make their way under many Christmas trees, but will find the insides of Starwood hotels, Harrah's casinos and T-Mobile shops."

466 comments

  1. Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is actually quite interesting technology. It has been conceived before - but only that - conceived. This is one time Microsoft gets kudos.

    1. Re:Kudos by Morky · · Score: 5, Informative

      Jeff Han might disagree.

    2. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are very correct! The concept has been toyed with, in idea and a few tests, but Microsoft is getting this out of concept phase and bringing what looks to be a usable product to market. The comparisons (slams) I am seeing to touchscreens is unwarranted and simply ignorant of what this product is, does and could potentially do. I am so tired of the constant Microsoft bashing - even though I am certainly no fan myself.

      The size of the table top screen itself is intriguing to me...

    3. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt that. Jeff Han demonstrated a multi-touch display, as did Apple with the iPhone. Scaling photos and interactive apps are nothing new - introduced by Jeff Han, Apple or Microsoft. What is interesting is the application (implementation, and that anyone could write apps for it (as opposed to iPhone, for example).

    4. Re:Kudos by Morky · · Score: 1

      The previous post said that the ideas demonstrated had only been conceived, not implemented. My point was that that is not true. The part where they interface with wireless devices may be new, however.

    5. Re:Kudos by dfghjk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "What is interesting is the application (implementation, and that anyone could write apps for it (as opposed to iPhone, for example)." ...and for the multitouch implementation to track more than two inputs (as opposed to the iPhone, for example) and use a screen larger than a postage stamp (as opposed to the iPhone, for example).

      Apple is using multitouch as a gimmick to create buzz. It doesn't actually do anything useful.

    6. Re:Kudos by nametaken · · Score: 1

      It almost seems like saw Han's demonstration and figured it would be a great way to show off the benefits of using XAML for UI design.

    7. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I disagree with the statement that the ideas have only been demonstrated too. We have been working with vendors for the last 3+ years on a multi-touch table and about 1.5 years with a multi-user, multi-touch video wall. We use Google Earth, Satellite ToolKit (STK), and a collaboration application (mark up of imagery related data) on both of them. I was very surprised to see Microsoft touting this when we have been working with this technology from multiple vendors now for a while. The only new feature as you mentioned is the wireless transfer of pictures to the device with it recognizing where the device was on the screen, and I'm not sure that it is very useful. When I transfer data, I want to store it in a directory structure or a database system rather than where I set the camera.

    8. Re:Kudos by DustyShadow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yea this stuff has been around for years: http://www.touchtable.com/site/index.php http://www.ms.northropgrumman.com/touchtable/ http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldie rtech_TouchTable,,00.html http://www.merl.com/projects/DiamondTouch/ The Mitsubishi one can recognize multiple users. I've used it and it's pretty cool. Touch tables are nothing new but it would be cool to see Microsoft start marketing this to consumers.

    9. Re:Kudos by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I agree the implementation's all there, but what's the business angle on it? A $10,000 rig that lets you share photos and surf the web is sort of retarded, even in places like hotels an casinos; it might have a use for sales and presentations, that sort of thing, but its useless for productivity, and the stated partners already have cheaper ways of doing what this thing does (slot machine, anyone? wifi in peoples rooms?). The iPhone may be a 'gimmick', but it uses the technology in a way that probably adds value to a smartphone, and very few at this point doubt Apple will be printing money selling the thing.

      The smart guy is going to be the one who figures out how to put this on people's desks for $1000, or in their backpacks for $2000. This Microsoft product appears to have superb implementation of stuff people only do casually. One hint as to how MS might make money off it is from the video in TFA where the guy from Research uses that goddamn word - "ecosystem" - to describe how different devices interact with the table. Meaning there'll probably be a Microsoft CoffeeTableForSure or whatever version of bluetooth that the table requires.

      OTOH, MS Research has a nasty habit of coming up with cool stuff that no one ever gets a chance to buy.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Kudos by Arkeologist · · Score: 1

      Yea I believe other stories mention that Microsoft has been working on this for 5 years too. Recognizing items you place on the screen is very useful. And I'm very sure the data transferred from the item laying on the screen/table top is stored in a directory structure and/or database. You just don't see it. It looks very user-friendly! Great work Microsoft!

    11. Re:Kudos by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      On the business possibilities, businessweek online has an interview with BillG about this very issue. I won't spoil the ending, but MS speculates it could be selling in the "low billions of dollars" in the things in a few years, though they only seem to know how to make it an information kiosk. At best it would be a "complimentary" computer to your office machine and, presumably, the computer hanging on your wall that sells you movies. There's your ecosystem.

      It might bear mentioning, of course, that the iPhone is also a complimentary computing device, so we all seem to be rowing in the same direction.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:Kudos by TougaSempai · · Score: 1

      Also, this Sun video from 1992 - http://www.asktog.com/starfire/index.html - had most or all of the concepts as in the Microsoft video, but with extra cheesy flavor. It is 15 years old though, so maybe they deserve a bit of slack.

    13. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was cool technology...when I first saw it being worked on at Sony Computer Science Laboratories back in 2002...ofn

      http://www.sonycsl.co.jp/person/rekimoto/smartskin /

    14. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Yea I believe other stories mention that Microsoft has been working on this for 5 years too.

      We've had a working product now for over 3 on the multi-touch table so I'm guessing the work on that has been out a bit longer than the 5 Microsoft has been working on it.

      Recognizing items you place on the screen is very useful.

      Any examples that you can think of? I think I'd rather just have the camera setup to automatically start transferring the photos during idle periods rather than waiting for me to set the camera on the table.

      And I'm very sure the data transferred from the item laying on the screen/table top is stored in a directory structure and/or database. You just don't see it.

      Yes, I'm sure the files are stored in a directory structure of some sort, but probably not a structure defined by me. I tend to group my photos by year and event if possible to help categorize them. I probably should have a better cataloging system but placing them in a structure that I defined is a simple one that works for me.

      Great work Microsoft!

      Nice to see this at the OS level for those who desire this interface. I just think that most of the work to bring this technology to light has been copied by Microsoft, not created by them.

    15. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have nothing but personal objections and empty assertions. I like your style. It's very Slashdot.

    16. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Other post already included links to previous technologies by other vendors so repeating them offers nothing to the discussion. The opinions are just my opinions that can be ignored if you like. The response is adequate for the post it is associated with. If "Arkeologist" has any objections to it, I'll gladly elaborate if needed. As for the empty assertion bit though, the only part that might even be taken as that would have to be the last statement and other post here have already provided links to back it up. I really do like the fact that the operating system can handle input like this rather than rigging up a configuration onto a system that doesn't support a wider range of devices. I just think the coverage is a bit misleading to the typical consumer by making them think that this is a Microsoft invention.

    17. Re:Kudos by westlake · · Score: 1
      We have been working with vendors for the last 3+ years on a multi-touch table and about 1.5 years with a multi-user, multi-touch video wall.

      But how close are you to getting a product on the market - and can you compete with Microsoft on price? Computer GUI Revolution Continues With Microsoft Surface's Touchscreen, Object Recognition

    18. Re:Kudos by gig · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > "What is interesting is the application (implementation, and that anyone could write apps for it (as opposed to iPhone, for example)."

      You may not have noticed, but iPhone has a full Web apps capable Web browser in it with Wi-Fi "n". It can run Flickr and eBay and Google everything as well as every other major site on the Internet.

      In addition to that, you will be able to install software through iTunes same as iPod video. Get with the fucking program if you are going to spout propaganda. Fucking keep up. Read a bit.

      > Apple is using multitouch as a gimmick to create buzz. It doesn't actually do anything useful.

      On the iPhone, the multi-touch screen replaces the keypad. Instead of touching any of 12 places with any finger, you can touch hundreds of places. In a sense it is a keypad that can morph into any button arrangement. This is not only appropriate for a phone, it also bears mentioning that iPhone is a real product, you can buy 20 of them for the price of one Microsoft Surface which is not even for sale. That's the real gimmick.

      > [Surface] use[s] a screen larger than a postage stamp (as opposed to the iPhone, for example).

      In the first place, the small screen in the iPhone is considered a feature because it helps it to fit into your pocket, unlike Surface.

      In the second place, the Surface screen is only 1024x768 ... that is only 4x the pixels of iPhone.

    19. Re:Kudos by gig · · Score: 1

      > You are very correct! The concept has been toyed with, in idea and a few tests,

      And in a highly-publicized phone that ships in a couple of weeks.

      > but Microsoft is getting this out of concept phase and bringing what looks to be a usable product to market.

      No, they are not getting it out of the concept phase, they are not bringing it to market. Did you read the fucking article?

      It is a demo only. It is the same as the electric cars that GM shows off every year but never makes.

      You're playing Microsoft's game. They only have two products: Office and Windows. Everything else is a marketing initiative. (In fact, some would say Office and Windows are also marketing initiatives, but at least they are actual products with users and SKU's and price points and everything.)

    20. Re:Kudos by Donut+Zeke · · Score: 0

      > "What is interesting is the application (implementation, and that anyone could write apps for it (as opposed to iPhone, for example)." You may not have noticed, but iPhone has a full Web apps capable Web browser in it with Wi-Fi "n". It can run Flickr and eBay and Google everything as well as every other major site on the Internet. In addition to that, you will be able to install software through iTunes same as iPod video. Get with the fucking program if you are going to spout propaganda. Fucking keep up. Read a bit.

      How about you read what he is actually saying? He is trying to say that the iPhone will not be open to programs written by anyone except Apple or, it seems, Google. The TouchTable will allow for open programs, which you don't have to buy through proprietary software like iTunes.

      I believe the comment about the small screen is to say that multitouch is useless on such a small screen, and it is. A normal touch screen would do just fine on a small screen, because using two fingers isn't practical on a small screen.
    21. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      We are not taking the product to market, we were the market. I didn't buy the touch table (multi-touch) or the video wall (multi-user, multi-touch). These were products purchased for our use. We have worked with software vendors to enable their applications to work on these devices, basically enabling the multi-touch and multi-user multi-touch to work with the software.

    22. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Read through the link you provided and the company who we have the multi-touch video wall through is Perceptive Pixel. I couldn't recall the name until reading it in your link. I still can't think who makes the touch table though.

    23. Re:Kudos by jrumney · · Score: 1

      As might the people at Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, whose work in this area dates back to the 1990's IIRC.

    24. Re:Kudos by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Dear god, could you be any more negative?

      Can't you see how damn handy the recognition and interaction with the objects on the table is?

      The ability to visually drag and drop items between devices is sensational. A group of friends can sit around a table, all put their phones/cameras on it and show, share and play with the content on those devices... just intuitively

      Amazing stuff.

      I just showed my colleagues at work the video and they were blown away by how great this would be to use, and that was one Engineer but not deep tech, and one completely non tech person.

      I'm very excited about interfaces like this.

    25. Re:Kudos by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 1

      "What is interesting is the application (implementation, and that anyone could write apps for it (as opposed to iPhone, for example)." This is inaccurate.

      If you actually read the press on both you will find that the iPhone *will* be open(ish) in the near future but that Apple wants to control the quality, (i.e. you will likely have to be certified by Apple to write for iPhone and the distribution might also be through Apple.)

      At the moment, the "WinCoffeTable" is in the same category in that they have a small group of certified developers that write applications for the thing. MS apparently envisions a similarly "semi-closed" certification route for the product.

      The idea of having to take a Microsoft certification course to write apps for a coffee table is amusing though. :-)
    26. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      How often do you and your friends sit around sharing photos like that? At family gatherings, we'll often exchange CDs with photos or maybe someone will hook up a camera to a laptop to download and burn CDs of the event, but other than that, I don't see that happening too often. Even with the family events though, it generally ends up being my brother and I that prepare the CDs for exchanging with the non-tech family members and I bet they end up in a drawer somewhere instead of being enjoyed. Other than the initial "Wow" factor, this isn't very impressive. I'm not saying that companies shouldn't develop technologies like this, but just because it looks "cool" doesn't mean it will be a successful product. We've done some interesting things from a technology demonstration standpoint with the table and wall we have but just about everyone questions how useful it would be in day to day business use.

    27. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I saw a video of someone playing Warcraft 3 on a table like this quite some time ago.

    28. Re:Kudos by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      But you're explaining exactly WHY this sort of technology is superb... it's because it requires you and your tech brother to transfer files, and burn them etc. etc., and then some quite time consuming and somewhat techy stuff to view them in a way they want to etc.

      If you had this as your coffee table, and you could come back from the place you just were, put the camera on the table and then sift through the photos visually, quickly, and just toss the ones that people want into their cameras or music/storage devices etc. then it WOULD become more common because of how easy it was, how intuitive.

      If that person, completely non tech minded, can then just go to their friend's place and plonk their device down on their friend's coffee table and instantly be showing them the photos... no tech knowledge required... how is that not cool?

      And this is just using photos... extend it to word documents, excel, graphs, all sorts of things and having a large one of these as a meeting desk at work would be fantastic.

      I welcome our new interactive table overlords. :)

    29. Re:Kudos by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      I may not have stated it clearly enough but my family doesn't spend a lot of time looking through photos. I did state that my brother and I end up burning all the CDs and probably misrepresented the "non-tech" family members as being completely computer illiterate but most do use computers, know how to burn CDs, etc.... The "non-tech" members are not tech focused (i.e. horticulturist, plumbers, teachers, sales, etc...) but they do know how to use computers for the most part. I stated that my brother and I get this because we're both in IT positions so we are assigned the task (sort of like most IT people end up the computer support person at family gatherings too). While the table does have some intriguing features, I just don't see that it would change much for family/friend gatherings as for exchanging media. I think it would be interesting for most for the first time or two using it but after that, it is just another gadget that doesn't fill a demand. As for complete non-tech people, they are likely to avoid this sort of device, even if it ultimately helps them. They are the type that avoid technology in general. As for extending this to other file formats (documents, spreadsheets, graphs, etc...), I don't see much here that isn't already addressed in a NetMeeting environment or whatever other collaboration tools a company chooses to use. Unless you are creating a document at a "brain storming" session most documents are generated by a single individual, critiqued by a few peers, and then presented to a group for final review, integration into a larger document, or collaboration. Where an input device like this could have some value is when working with link analysis or relationship analysis applications. I just don't see too many people using tools like that.

  2. Where do ideas come from? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that's annoying. I wrote a computer display coffee-table into a science-fiction story that I just finished writing, and now everybody's going to think I just steal ideas from reading Slashdot.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Where do ideas come from? by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Or from the movie the Island. I'm pretty sure that won't be the first time either. Most things/ideas on there own are just not all that orginal.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    2. Re:Where do ideas come from? by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft were a big investor in The Island, and since this technology has been in secret development since 2001 (apparently under the codename Milan) it's not too much of a stretch to think that the interface from the 2005 film was directly inspired by this product.

    3. Re:Where do ideas come from? by delt0r · · Score: 0

      Really? M$ invests in Movies.... mmm Now i think about the fighting game in the Island was with a "xbox". I hope that is in devoplemnt too cus even i would get a console (Even a M$ one) for that ;)

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    4. Re:Where do ideas come from? by D-Cypell · · Score: 0

      "You must be new here!

      A story by Geoffrey Landis.

      It was the year of Linux on the desktop. In soviet Russia, a beowulf was wondering what a cluster of me would be like. Then, in walked Natilie Portman in hot grits..."

    5. Re:Where do ideas come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tron, from 1982. Dillinger had one for his desk, so you're a little late there son. Does Microsoft's display have the MCP operating system, I wonder?

    6. Re:Where do ideas come from? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      What, so you are saying you don't read /. and 'er' borrow ideas from it? I thought the exchange of ideas was the whole point of /.. You just can't claim them as you own, borrowing is OK, permanently pilfering just sucks ;).

      All my ideas are free to use. Conditional. You use mine you give me yours.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:Where do ideas come from? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Not /. but certainly every popular science fiction author who ever wrote about future style computers ;-p

      OR, have you been avoiding the written word for the last 40 years and just now took a peak at /. for some guilty pleasure? That would be the worst possible scenario.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    8. Re:Where do ideas come from? by Dik+Zak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Microsoft were all over in that movie. The directory/phone booth thing was MSN.

    9. Re:Where do ideas come from? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Please explain hot grits. I seem to have missed this internet meme sprouting up and now I have no idea what it references.

    10. Re:Where do ideas come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the meme called "Google" as well?

    11. Re:Where do ideas come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen touch top tables in museums before, I think the novelty here is that it costs about ten times more than existing ones, (oh, and can have multiple touch points).

    12. Re:Where do ideas come from? by feedmetrolls · · Score: 0

      I guess 2007 won't be the year of Linux on the coffee table.

      --
      You are reading a sig. Cancel or allow?
  3. But does it.... by rueger · · Score: 1

    Play PacMan?

    1. Re:But does it.... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      What about pinball?
      vp + vpinmame would be cool on this!
      http://www.vpforums.com/

    2. Re:But does it.... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Sure, hack it with MAME or some emulator. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  4. Credit where due department by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Props to MS for coming up with a more-or-less unprecedented product.
    The emacs users will quickly be shaking from key withdrawal, of course. ;)

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Credit where due department by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it is really a great product, very interesting, everything in the demo seems to simple to use, very Apple like. Microsoft has taken a clue because it seems something like Apple would do when it comes to ease of use. Just placing a memory stick on the table downloads its contents? Brilliant! I'm really happy that something like this is coming out, lets just hope it gets to us mere mortals sooner rather than later.

    2. Re:Credit where due department by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      sorry but no. I saw this demonstrated 3+ years ago at MIT by a couple of EE and CS students (I forgot their names) working on multipoint touch interfaces. They created almost everything I saw in that example/demo video, except the mockup of the transfer to phone.

      That are not innovating this, Students at MIT did this before them and they either hired those students, or copied their work.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Credit where due department by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      You mean Jeff Han? I saw his demo last year.

    4. Re:Credit where due department by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK there is a program called Dragon's Den, it's like a program where people sell their ideas to the dragons and they offer them money in exchange for a share of the company. This program featured a computerised coffee table that I think was touchscreen, but the dragons ripped it apart. I remember thinking it was a good idea, but they really did have some good arguments about why it won't have a market.

    5. Re:Credit where due department by fiordhraoi · · Score: 1
      That being said, it's a long way from a proof-of-concept prototype to a marketable product. I'm not a big MS fan (though I don't loathe them as much as it seems a lot of slashdotters do), but I'll still give them Kudos on a really cool product.

      They just need to integrate a scanner into it so people can do the classic office party "sit on the copier/scan my butt" thing. Only now, we can make your butt HUGE!

    6. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks to me this is actually perceptive pixel - although I am sure MS will buy it up.

      http://www.perceptivepixel.com/

      MS is not founded on innovation but copying and refining - not that that is bad - but it is not a company for innovation through creation.

      So credit on putting a working package together can I have my copy of Minority Report back now?

    7. Re:Credit where due department by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Actually it does have a market, just not at $10,000 a pop. Running windows not withstanding, If it ran Linux and was not a DRM encumbered PVR, then HELL yes, it has a market...

    8. Re:Credit where due department by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Already somebody wants linux on it. I think some catch-up is in order from the Open Source movement first.

    9. Re:Credit where due department by GreggBz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh Cripes, throw me a technology idea that no one else has thought of first. I challenge you. It's likely that I can name some obscure program on my Amiga or find a Star Trek gadget that did the same thing. Computer software and hardware is evolutionary, and ideas that come to market are almost never ever completely original. The point is, who can polish the idea, make it usable and find a market willing to pay the price for it first.

    10. Re:Credit where due department by fermion · · Score: 1
      The software is what might make it interesting. The other tech, in basic form, has been around for a while. For example, smarttech has front project and rear projection, along with really nice software. Widgets can be dragged to locations. Touch a color and draw with your finger. Rotate the widget. Capture screen. All the cool stuff.

      For commercial users, the packaging as a single compact device will be interesting. I can see this being used to enhance the Mini auto boutique, allowing the customers to design the car. I can also see this is certain corporate setting.

      For education, I don't know. Schools that want tech already have smartboards, and they can be had inexpensively. It would be nice not to have to deal with projector. OTOH, I am unclear on the size and OS. Articles have intimated that there one has to use specialized developers, which may mean this is intended to be a Xbox rather than a commodity product. Why buy into a whole new thing, when a Mac and smartboard will let you do everything using industry standard tools, like flash, java, photoshop, etc.

      This is good news as is shows that MS is trying to buck the commodity trend and come up some real products. If the software works, this will be a great little product, and will open the door for competition.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Credit where due department by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      TFA tried to make it sound like Mr. Softy had actually gone off and done a skunk-works type of project on this one.
      Or course, they may have simply acquired technology in a fashion similar to:

      *** will exercise its *** to *** by no later than *** that (i) the *** Surface (version 2 or later) *** does or will *** Surface format ("Surface"), and (ii) it will make a *** *** If *** does not *** it will *** within the same time frame that *** in the *** on a*** to *** Surface. *** will provide its *** to*** at least *** in advance of *** The *** will be *** not to be *** will provide *** in the *** will *** of such *** the Term, including through *** in the *** is defined in the Business Collaboration Agreement.
      but hey, we're in a good mood, so how 'bout the benefit of the doubt?
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    12. Re:Credit where due department by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Just placing a memory stick on the table downloads its contents? Brilliant!

      It's probably not quite that simple...

      The articles I've read claim that the table will be able to read barcodes and communicate with devices placed on it. None of the articles gave any hint as to how that would happen. I'm sure they have ideas how to do this, but I suspect that the videos and demos are currently smoke and mirrors.

      It might be interesting to do a patent search to see what related patents MS has filed since 2001. That might give us a clue what they're intending.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    13. Re:Credit where due department by encoderer · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sorry but no.

      That's like saying the cell phone isn't novel because radios were being used for 50 years. Or it's like saying that the iPhone isn't novel because it also uses multi-touch.

      Especially since Microsofts implementation of multi-touch is MUCH DIFFERENT than Hans. Microsofts uses infrared cameras to detect the touch. Hans doesn't AFAIK.

    14. Re:Credit where due department by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh Cripes, throw me a technology idea that no one else has thought of first. I challenge you.
      Oh I cannot resist. How about..... an electromagnetic colorectal implant. It can be used to stick your keys, cellphone, etc to your waist w/o need for pouches or a belt, it helps you... uh, stick to metal seats better? Oh, and you can make interesting light shows by shakin' your booty next to CRTs. Just don't walk too close to the knife bock in your kitchen with it turned on!

      I *really* hope no one else has thought of that.
      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    15. Re:Credit where due department by someone300 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well yeah, if it was very cheap it probably would have a market, but at a price any more than a cheap computer I can't imagine it being popular. The main feature seems to be things like showing off your family pics using it, transferring your pics to your network and so on, but really, it's too awkward to watch a movie on, do some editing, or even read with. You'd be hurting your neck. I can't really see a great deal of uses for it, at least no more than a media centre PC, especially when coupled with a laptop. Most people I know are just too happy with slideshows on their TV. This would have the 'wow!' factor, but I don't think it's particularly useful.

      Not that this multitouch stuff doesn't have a potential as a technology, but Microsoft certainly didn't pioneer this technology, it's been in the works by various researchers for ages. And I think it's great. Honestly though, I think a coffee table has to be one of the worst uses for it at the moment. Maybe if it cost nearly nothing, it'd be a nice addition to the electronic household.

      One of the key components of surface computing is a "multitouch" screen. It is an idea that has been floating around the research community since the 1980s


      It'd probably work better as a worksurface rather than a coffee table at the moment. As in, a worksurface that you sit at, put papers on and has a laptop with a screen on too. It'd be great for managing the link between your work system, laptop and so on, taking quick notes and syncing your mobile phone, but it's just so expensive. I, and many people I know, prefer typing. Microsoft so desperately wants to rid the world of the keyboard but nothing I've seen comes close to a keyboard in terms of usability and speed.

      I think it'd also be useful for graphics artists if they can make the visibility better.

      Though, I do like the coffee table picture transfer thing. If they linked that into a media centre PC so that you put a camera on it and the display with the TV on says "Saving pictures from camera..." and then just let you be until "Press red to view the pictures". I think the coffee table screen is a bad idea at the moment though.
    16. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The emacs users will quickly be shaking from key withdrawal, of course. ;)

      Those MegaTouch touch screen video games in your neighborhood bar are running Linux.

      -mcgrew (who spends lots of time in bars trying unsucessfully to get laid)

    17. Re:Credit where due department by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Actually, I meant for it to be a second screen on the entertainment/pvr system in the family/living room area. The interface is all fingers (good) and doesn't require traditional PC equipment in a place that traditionally doesn't have PC equipment... could be a good thing.
      The main viewing for video should still be on the flat screen etc., but the UI for the system could be on the top of the 'coffee table'

    18. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then give credit where credit is due.

      Dont simply echo MSFT marketing.

      Sounds like you 100% agree with lumpy.

    19. Re:Credit where due department by someone300 · · Score: 1

      It would be good as you say, but it has quite limited uses in it's current manifestation and isn't particularly necessary, at least given the price of such a device. I'd like to be able to retrofit that camera/phone detection technology to my coffee table though :P

    20. Re:Credit where due department by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      You mean Jeff Han? I'm pretty sure they're both using FTIR (Frustrated total internal reflection) screens.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    21. Re:Credit where due department by tshak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh Cripes, throw me a technology idea that no one else has thought of first.

      Exactly. Everyone should go read The Myths Of Innovation (O'Reilly) before making comments about innovation.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    22. Re:Credit where due department by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      As in, a worksurface that you sit at, put papers on and has a laptop with a screen on too.

      I don't see why you'd need a separate laptop. If you want to type, place your WUSB keyboard on top of the surface and type. If you want to use a mouse, place your WUSB mouse on the surface and mouse. If you want another display, place your wireless monitor on the table. It could put a circle around the montor's footprint so you can drag your windows from the table surface to the display surface.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    23. Re:Credit where due department by encoderer · · Score: 1

      for the actual touch sensitivity, maybe. But for object detection, Microsofts unit uses infrared cameras. Watch the demo. It really is impressive.

    24. Re:Credit where due department by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the objection is to Microsoft claiming the invention i.e. "Microsoft Surface". The first speaker in the video says "it's the first of its kind..." which is simply not true.

        TED, where I first saw the photo enlarging/spinningidea shown, isn't an obscure venue. The idea of putting objects on a touch surface and having them interact I believe was Reactable's The Reactable interface showed up at a Bjork concert. Again, not an obscure venue.

      What tweaks a lot of people isn't that ideas evolve but that Microsoft gloms onto them and then claims they came up with the idea and patent it. Microsoft deserves credit for bringing the ideas to market in a different guise but not for innovating.

    25. Re:Credit where due department by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      The cost appears to be prohibitive. The navigation is a little different, but not much utility is gained for moving menus from the tv screen to the remote. The bulk of the time in front of a TV is spent watching it rather than manipulating it.

    26. Re:Credit where due department by bwbadger · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is an example of why software idea patents are so bad. Ideas like these can always be taken further, unless you fear being sued for patent infringement. Who did what first has nothing to do with this. Patent battles are fought and won by the party with the biggest budget for lawyers. I bet both Microsoft and Apple will be able to keep working in this space because of a combination of their patents and money. Everybody else will be in the freezer. So sad.

    27. Re:Credit where due department by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      You know what? Nevermind, this could probably sell well just for the cool-factor, there'll definitely be a niche market for that at least.

    28. Re:Credit where due department by GreggBz · · Score: 1

      Your idea is simply an evolution of this. I win.

    29. Re:Credit where due department by rlbond86 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is working with Jeff Han's company, Perceptive Pixel. They're not stealing.

    30. Re:Credit where due department by rlbond86 · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's right. I forgot. Normal people want to use Linux. That would make the difference right there; nobody will buy it since it's not open source.

    31. Re:Credit where due department by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I think the main market for this product in it's current manifestation is the niche. 'Cool' rich people with every gadget known to man, those spiffy shops with image projectors everywhere and stuff to appeal to the consumer culture...

    32. Re:Credit where due department by Zwack · · Score: 1
      For Graphic artists there is already something out there...

      Sure it's not cheap (but it's cheaper than this MS coffee table) but the Cintiq is highly recommended for graphic artists.

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    33. Re:Credit where due department by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      They've tried magnetic implants in other places for carrying of gadgets and small metal objects, but they didn't work because the pressure of carrying stuff around on the magnets kills the tissue between the magnet and the skin. But there has been some success in a spinoff technique of implanting magnets in fingertips so you can feel magnetic fields.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    34. Re:Credit where due department by et764 · · Score: 1

      Andy Wilson, one of the guys at Microsoft Research who seems to have done a lot of the research work that let to this table product, got his PhD at MIT, so it's not unreasonable to think that Andy Wilson was probably involved on similar multitouch interfaces at MIT. At any rate, this is taking a research prototype and bringing a product based on it to market. I'm guessing the work at MIT was not ready to be commercialized yet, so it's unfair to complete discount what Microsoft has done here.

    35. Re:Credit where due department by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, thanks for the link, too bad to see that site has been moved to a regular webserver. I'm not sure that the word 'evolution' could be applied to either my terrible idea or theirs, except perhaps in the invocation of a Darwin award. ;)

      Also another poster pointed out the experiment to implant magnets in fingertips to detect elector-magnetic fields, which is also very close. Nothing new under the sun I guess, including where the sun don't shine!

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    36. Re:Credit where due department by stun · · Score: 1
      @Jtheletter

      coloRECTAL implant Somehow I don't like the sound of the product name. No thank you, I think i will keep my behind as I was born with. No fricken implants in there.
    37. Re:Credit where due department by gig · · Score: 1

      You can use Bluetooth to get stuff off of devices that are still in your pocket or purse. You don't have to so much as take them out of there to place them on a table. This feature is as timely as Microsoft's recent Flash competitor.

      Also, innovating a way to un-flatten displays again only a few years after they went flat ... that is really something. It is like making a really, really big iPod, and refusing to use flash memory or play RSS feeds with enclosures (Podcasts). Oh, wait, Microsoft did that also.

      > I'm really happy that something like this is coming out

      Who said it was coming out? They are going to give a few away to corporate partners.

    38. Re:Credit where due department by gig · · Score: 1

      > The point is, who can polish the idea, make it usable and find a market willing to pay the price for it first.

      If that is the point, then Microsoft has FAILED MISERABLY. This is not a product, it is not coming to market, it doesn't have a price ($5000-$10,000?), and nobody is even willing to pay for it. T-Mobile is not there saying we can't wait to pay $10,000 for this.

      Now, if this is just another demo, and it is years later than all the other product demos of this kind, THEN WE ARE VERY RIGHT TO BUST MICROSOFT'S BALLS ABOUT IT. If another startup out of somebody's garage showed this demo we would piss our pants laughing at the absurdity of it and tell them to call us when they have a fucking SKU to share. If Surface was a PRODUCT, we could move out of the "my demo is bigger than yours" arena and into actual use cases.

      However, we cannot.

      This is just another fucking demo, and it is more impressive to me that the iPhone is going to put multi-touch into millions of pockets starting like next week than it is that Microsoft had enough money to build yet another PC-based art project that nobody fucking wants.

    39. Re:Credit where due department by gig · · Score: 1

      Wow, Microsoft invented "detecting things with cameras."

      Finally, there is hope in the 21st century.

      This fucking thing is only slightly more impressive than the Kodak machine at my Walgreen's. If you told me this was NEXT year's Kodak machine for Walgreen's I would be like, "yeah, OK." Read the article, turns out it is.

    40. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought of it? I've PATENTED it!

    41. Re:Credit where due department by gig · · Score: 1

      > The main viewing for video should still be on the flat screen etc., but the UI for the system could be on the top of the 'coffee table'

      You are talking about replacing the TV remote with a coffee table instead of a better TV remote.

      Even so, wouldn't an iPhone make more sense that Surface in this context? It is hand-sized, it can emulate any key layout (could even have a picture of a TV remote on there) and it can stream videos and photos to an AppleTV. This is not strange futuristic tech I'm talking about, this stuff is happening now.

    42. Re:Credit where due department by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Well, sort of, It would definitely be a remote you couldn't lose, but it would also put a PC in your living room that could be used while the TV is playing. To store video downloads and playback on screen, you need a pc really, and being able to surf the channel lineup while the show is playing on your PVR is also cool. The extra equipment just makes a lot of sense to *BE* the coffee table

    43. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit where credit is due? O.K.:

      http://bumptop.com/

      Don't know if this is also Microsoft, but it doesn't look like it. I first saw it on YouTube I _think_ about a year ago. Wonder how long it takes for Microsoft to buy them out.

    44. Re:Credit where due department by encoderer · · Score: 0

      keep buying the FUD, bro.... i don't mind...

    45. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who said it was coming out? They are going to give a few away to corporate partners.

      To quote http://microsoft.com/surface/ :
      "While the first Microsoft Surface units won't hit the market until Winter 2007..."

      Sounds like it is "coming out" to me...

    46. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what shit for brains modded this flamebait?

      It's now considered flamebait when you point out a microsoft upcoming product existed before MSFT claims it to be theirs?

      It seems that everything will be modded flamebait soon!

    47. Re:Credit where due department by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They do this with regular magnets in cows to make the small pieces of metal that they eat all get clumped together so that they can be removed with a simple surgery rather than individually.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    48. Re:Credit where due department by sheldonc · · Score: 1

      Check out Jeff Han's new company, the Perceptive Pixel at http://www.perceptivepixel.com/ The original NYU Quicktime demo reel is at http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/ Look familiar? I'm sure MS hooked up with these guys. This demo has been out there for a while.

    49. Re:Credit where due department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most cases they leave the magnet (and anything stuck to it) in the cow's stomach for the whole life of the cow as it rarely does enough damage to warrant surgery. They just harvest the magnet when the cow dies so they can reuse it.

  5. Innovation at Microsoft: by FredDC · · Score: 1

    Tilt the screen at a different angle!

    --
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63
    1. Re:Innovation at Microsoft: by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Innovation at Microsoft:
        Tilt the screen at a different angle!


      Sigh. Here's why I don't like Slashdot.

    2. Re:Innovation at Microsoft: by rlbond86 · · Score: 1

      Innovation at Slashdot:
      Make fun of Microsoft!

  6. Amazing work. I want one, like now. by Shivetya · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is so "Star Trek" to the geek in me. Finally, a way to use the computing processing power available in a method about anyone can use. Now to get it into a package that is thinner and doesn't require the supporting table.

    The ease of use that is apparent is key, the idea is there, its the software that makes it all the more so amazing. I cannot wait till this type of interface is the standard

    on a side note, why did it take it 930AM EST to get this up on /.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  7. Porn has to be the killer application for this ... by pgrote · · Score: 1

    The porn industry always finds way to bring the new technology to the masses. While I am at a loss to explain how this will happen, you have to have an imagination to think it will happen.

    Instead of setting up in the lobby of the Sheraton hotels, maybe they should make holosuite sort of things.

    I would imagine that some sort of tactile feedback would be needed, though.

    http://www.yald.com/microsoft-surface-porn

  8. Similar tech by TequilaMonster · · Score: 2, Informative

    There were some videos a while back of a similar system being demo'd. It showed a system which allowed for multiple simultaneous touches to be detected, so you could actually grab a photograph and resize it by pulling the corners. You could give commands by chording touches on the screen. It looked really interesting, but I can't find it anymore - anybody know where I can find them again?

    --
    Tequila - drink of the gods.
    1. Re:Similar tech by yakumo.unr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes that video was Jeff Han (also featured in the video in TFA) demoing his display a year or two ago.

    2. Re:Similar tech by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/

      There ya go.

      And there was yet another that allowed you to mix music and create synthesized effects in real time by arranging various oddly-shaped prisms on the surface. I have two (large) videos of that but I don't know where they came from.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Similar tech by tom17 · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Similar tech by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Yes but the idea of having the camera/PDA/whatever interact like that is completely new in my mind. I haven't seen anything like that.

      Props to MS for taking existing tech and adding some real functionality to it. Usually they just steal it outright. lol

    5. Re:Similar tech by elwinc · · Score: 1

      Mitsubishi has a similar coffee table thing they call diamondtouch . It can handle two hands per user and the version I saw allowed 4 users. Oh yeah, and it was first publicized in 2001!

      --
      --- Often in error; never in doubt!
    6. Re:Similar tech by gig · · Score: 1

      > Yes but the idea of having the camera/PDA/whatever interact like that is completely new in my mind. I haven't seen anything like that.

      There are many games doing this kind of thing. For example, there are games you can play with Web cams.

  9. Dambit! by monkeyboythom · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anybody use a coaster these days?

    And when I use a solvent to clean it, will it "melt" what's on the screen?

    1. Re:Dambit! by milosoftware · · Score: 1

      It will most certainly see a lot of cleaning solvent, since the whole family seems to be touching it with their filthy fingers, and I can only begin to imagine the kinds of materials that will be spilled on it.

      --
      Musicians don't die. They just decompose.
    2. Re:Dambit! by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Touch screen are already recognized as great ways to transmit sudh things as colds, flues, pink eye, etc.

      They'd better make sure that this thing can handle 409 and Windex...

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    3. Re:Dambit! by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      A lot of people touch doorknobs and stairway hand rails too, but nobody ever seems to complain about them.

      Reminds me of a building I used to work in.. They had biometric palm sensors on the main doors for security. They got rid of them because people claimed that they were spreading colds, etc. But right after using the palm sensor, you had to grab a handle on the door to open it...

    4. Re:Dambit! by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      From what I know of FTIR screens (I think that's what they're using), the outer layer is probably a back projection screen, with something like acrylic glass under it.
      There's no active tech in the screen itself, just the projector, the camera and the IR LEDs, so the screen should tolerate whatever doesn't damage the projection screen. I think they can make those out of plastics, which should be pretty washable unless you by solvent mean Acetone and the likes.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  10. Who wants to be a kabillionaire by packetmon · · Score: 1

    Snippet... you just run your credit card through a reader built into the table (or, when RFID cards have become the norm, just slap your card on the tabletop) and your new phone is paid for. And the casinos are looking into this to? I guess some black/grey hatters will be heading over to http://www.rfidvirus.org/ in pre-anticipation of those Texas Hold-em games...

  11. The ultimate gamer by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Must have... assming it is thought out better then the Zune.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:The ultimate gamer by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Hey, hey... let's not go out on a limb here...

      It is frankly a cool thing. Mind you I can just see my 2-year-old daughter messing with it and launching WWIII...

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:The ultimate gamer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, if your daughter is like my daughter, WWIII would be fought with dandelions...all in all, wouldn't be too shabby.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Nice vid by yakumo.unr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting to see briefly a little on what's happened to Jeff Han (formed his own company producing multi touch displays for business and military, including wall sized as demoed in the vid, easy to do as it's a projection display) as well as more footage of Microsoft's new toy.

  13. Multi-touch display at T.E.D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is this like what was shown at T.E.D. conference?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JcSu7h-I40

  14. Initially... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... it was a chair with a screen in it, but every morning when the designers came in for work the chair had been thrown around...

  15. Re:Inovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's reasonable to expect the hardware component to suffer from the usual first-generation problems that microsoft products enjoy. While those will probably get fixed it's still microsoft software running behind the scenes and there's no fix for that.

    I'm optimistic that someone will port linux to it.

  16. Wow... by john+g+the+4th · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Brought to you by the people who created such great products as Windows ME, and Windows Vista; we have the most expensive computer you've ever spilled liquid on! Seriously.. by the time this really hits the commercial market (I would say 2 years), the linux version will be better.

    1. Re:Wow... by AP2k · · Score: 1

      According to www.microsoft.com/surface, its going to be out this winter.

  17. Congratulations, Microsoft by wumpus188 · · Score: 0, Troll

    1970 called, it wants its four wheel drive PC back.

    1. Re:Congratulations, Microsoft by feedmetrolls · · Score: 0

      The bridge just called. It wants its trolls back. And the goats.

      And...

      In Soviet Russia, coffee table touches you!

      --
      You are reading a sig. Cancel or allow?
  18. Conception by simpl3x · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is just about nine months since: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/65

    But like rearing a child, we'll see the person in 5 to seven years... Or, in a month when the iPhone is released.

    1. Re:Conception by Himring · · Score: 1

      But like rearing a child....

      He wants to rear a child!

      cik!

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  19. Make it thinner and hang it on a wall by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    and then I can pretend I'm in Minority Report all day long.

  20. In Tron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There wasn't an table with display in Tron or was in others movies?

  21. Reminds me of The Island... by AmIAnAi · · Score: 1

    This thing is just like Dr. Merrick's desk in The Island. When I first saw the film I thought it was a really impressive and practical interface.

    Mind you, I think the coffee-table idea is a bit risky - having seen the scratches and spills my young daughter inflicts on our toughtened glass coffee-table...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    1. Re:Reminds me of The Island... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      it shouldn't matter if you get some sort of clear shelf paper and then cover the table (think Big honking PDA)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  22. Re:Amazing work. I want one, like now. by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    Now to get it into a package that is thinner and doesn't require the supporting table.

    The other week Sony unveiled their thin flexible screen. I'm sure you could combine that with existing multi-touch membrane technology.
  23. I've seen this before... by KevDude · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the Reactable synthesizer. Cool demo video here. The original looks way more fun than checking into a hotel too...

  24. Re:Inovation by Morky · · Score: 1

    I'll bite. Google or YouTube Jeff Han.

  25. Inductive charger? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No? Pfft...

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Inductive charger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first thought as well.

  26. It's all about marketing by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find this very interesting from a marketing perspective. They are promoting this as if it was a product, and yet it isn't on sale - and even the implementations they are talking about (T-Mobile, Sheraton Hotels) are really trials with partners that won't be happening until the end of next year.

    So what is this all about? The Vista and Office '07 launches haven't gone well from a marketing perspective - there has been a lot of press basically saying that Microsoft is losing its competitive edge. Couple that with the iPhone, and the fact that Apple is almost certainly going to be launching new products with multi-touch capabilities over the next year or so, and I think it is clear what is going on. Microsoft really want to improve their image in relation to Apple - they don't want Apple to be seen as the innovator and them as the company that's lost it.

    Notice on the website that they have a section called "origins" giving the history of the technology within Microsoft - I think they are trying to reverse the image that they copy Apple. Now when the touch-screen iMac is launched (or whatever) Microsoft will have done a fairly good job at taking some of the shine off the launch, even though they don't have a consumer product in the area, nor will they have for some years.

    Note, I am not saying that Microsoft are not serious about this as a product -- just that this news launch (about a product that doesn't exist) is all about addressing people's perceptions of the company, and trying to piss on Apple's fire a bit.

    1. Re:It's all about marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now when the touch-screen iMac is launched (or whatever) Microsoft will have done a fairly good job at taking some of the shine off the launch, even though they don't have a consumer product in the area, nor will they have for some years.

      It's called Tablet PC and it's been available for five years now. But thank you for trying to rewrite history to make it seem like Apple invented it.

    2. Re:It's all about marketing by pubjames · · Score: 1

      But thank you for trying to rewrite history to make it seem like Apple invented it.

      I never said anything of the sort. Try rereading what I said without the assumption that I'm an Apple fanboy.

    3. Re:It's all about marketing by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately as is typical for M$ it just all comes of a copies of other peoples existing ideas. People have been dreaming about large screen very high resolution interactive work surfaces for years. M$ of blows it by target the wrong audience, coffee table surfaces in Hotels, typical, all flash and no substance.

      The real target audience should have been architects and engineers etc. using CAD but that would have taken at least half a brain. They would pay the price for the gained productivity if done correctly and the potential for sales would have been far greater. Now all that has to happen is for a smarter manufacturer to "re-invent" this device and target it at a different more profitable market.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:It's all about marketing by mcguirez · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's a proven technique to grab headlines for a while.

      Remember the Origami effort? It was another 'wishful'
      non-product. It just recently fizzled quietly away.

      This *could* be more useful. Maybe this will have some life
      as hotel lobby tech. Speaking of which - I wonder what happened
      to all those hi-def thin panel fishtanks prominent in Japanese
      hotel lobbies? (They were large LCD or plasma displays behind a
      thin layer of water and air bubbles.)

      --
      When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
    5. Re:It's all about marketing by marshac · · Score: 1

      I'm sure none of the Microsoft engineers ever saw this when it was circulating the net a few years back either-

      http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2003 /07/59837

      Clearly some microsoft "innovation" at work...

    6. Re:It's all about marketing by marshac · · Score: 1

      Here's a better link to use- http://www.jamespatten.com/audiopad/

    7. Re:It's all about marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates has been promising smart surfaces to use with smartphones for some time. He's shown demos at various times in the past including CES. This is a natural evolution. Just as this is a new use of a touch surface, the iMac (if released) will be innovative since no one has shipped a desktop on a wide scale with a touch screen interface. Tablet PCs are neat, but they are often slow and drain battery life. Apple's product (if it exists) will allow people to use it at their desk without running out of juice. Imagine using iTunes with a slightly modified interface and touch display! Consider surfing in safari or using dashboard with a touch screen.

      The real problem is that Microsoft lost control of Intel when AMD hit it big. Those two could "partner" to push new technology down to consumers. Windows 95 pushed 32bit to the masses obsoleting old 286 chips running early Windows 3.x. Now, Microsoft can't help push 64bit computing even though both Intel and AMD have chips. Vista should have been 64bit only. People forget that Microsoft has to strong arm customers to get them to upgrade anything. Otherwise, everyone would still be stuck in Windows 3.x with a 640x480 monitor running Netscape 1.0. We're geeks who want new stuff, but average people only buy a new computer when theirs breaks beyond obvious repair or they buy a new software package that won't run well or at all. Everyone agrees that XP is good enough so Microsoft is having sales problems. They couldn't convince technical people to upgrade, let alone end users who just want their existing software to work.

    8. Re:It's all about marketing by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Chances are a team in Microsoft Research or something has been working on this product for a while and they demoed it as soon as was possible and convenient. Microsoft is a pretty large company.

      I think the Apple credit lately has been almost a shame, since Microsoft has a long history of making future computing technology available on commodity hardware/ for the masses.

      Lately, Apple gets lauded with every single innovation, whether or not they were first. It's like how Apple is celebrating their 'brand new, innovative' Resolution-Independent interface for Leopard, while no one mentions that Vista was already resolution-independent.

      I am surprised the open source community is more focused on being anti-Microsoft, so they tend to want to credit Apple with things. Apple represents the direct polar opposite to open source- they are the ultimate home of DRM, proprietary everything, etc.- their only use for open source has been stealing code bases.

      The point is- I could see Microsoft trying to remind people that they're responsible for quite a bit of innovation as being a completely credible practice. In recent history, I think Apple has not been innovating but merely polishing old ideas- they represent the super-stable with a 'new' look. Look at their 'New' virtual desktops.

      Anyone else feeling ripped off?

    9. Re:It's all about marketing by nine-times · · Score: 1

      What you're saying sounds right. Apple is coming out with the iPhone soon, Palm is supposed to be releasing some new device today that runs Linux (who knows whether it'll live up to the hype circulating around). Meanwhile, Microsoft has Windows Vista and the Zune, so they really want to hype something.

      So they come out with a touch-screen device that really isn't a consumer device, have some cool-looking demos of how it theoretically could work, and try to make it look like they've invented something. Maybe there are people who will hear about this who hadn't seen multi-touch stuff will be really impressed and think Microsoft has invented a really great device. However, I'd bet that you won't see very many of these until a couple years have passed, the price has come down, and Microsoft is on revision 2 or 3. Meanwhile, they'll probably make it so the device only runs Windows, the portable-device connectivity only works with the Zune and cameras that have paid MS some licensing fee, and just generally it won't work properly with any non-Microsoft products.

    10. Re:It's all about marketing by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Chances are a team in Microsoft Research or something has been working on this product for a while and they demoed it as soon as was possible and convenient.

      Ah yes, but this isn't a demo of something being done in Microsoft Research, this is being hyped by Microsoft's marketing machine as being a coming product. There's a big difference.

      I think the Apple credit lately has been almost a shame, since Microsoft has a long history of making future computing technology available on commodity hardware/ for the masses.

      True, although it has to be said that a lot of Microsoft's innovation stays in the lab, whereas Apple have been quite consistent at launching innovative new products.

      The point is- I could see Microsoft trying to remind people that they're responsible for quite a bit of innovation as being a completely credible practice.

      Yes, Microsoft R&D do some incredible stuff. The dumb thing is that a lot of it never sees the light because it would compete with the existing Microsoft cash-cows.

    11. Re:It's all about marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you completely missed the fucking point and you spell Microsoft with a dollar sign. That's so cool. Typical retarded slashbot.

    12. Re:It's all about marketing by Red+Leader. · · Score: 1

      Here are some even better links. MIT's SenseTable was presented at CHI 2001. http://tangible.media.mit.edu/projects/sensetable/

      Here's a good MIT thesis on RFID tables: http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~mazalek/publications/ mazalek_phd-thesis.pdf

      There's more than just Audiopad, look at all these audio-related tables: http://mtg.upf.edu/reactable/?related

    13. Re:It's all about marketing by gig · · Score: 1

      > People have been dreaming about large screen very high resolution interactive work surfaces for years.

      The article says that Microsoft Surface is 1024x768, that is not very high resolution. It's only 4x more pixels than iPhone.

    14. Re:It's all about marketing by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually just the opposite. Plenty of firms have been selling these devices to engineers for several years. But the average public never sees them. MS wants to get these out so that the average person is using them, then in a couple years when prices drop these average people will buy them for their homes. A few hundred or sales versus a few million.

    15. Re:It's all about marketing by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The large screen has to be very high resolution, otherwise no fine lines, blocky curves and crappy text. The M$ product is just marketing hype with out any real application. This product just reflects ballmer's disconnect from reality ie. he spends to much time in hotel rooms hunched over a coffee table, which might not be all that bad, if there was actually coffee on that table, rather than an excess of his preferred drunken solution to everything.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:It's all about marketing by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Yes the average home, did you know the typical home can afford, 4 notebooks, 4 smart phones/PDAs, a couple of big screen tv's, a dedicated home server, a games console, 4 music players and to top that all off, they can afford to replace all the software and the hardware every two years and fill all of hardware full of M$ approved Vista (FU)DRMed content, now add to that a couple of coffee table screens, what, you say that exceeds the average families budget for computers by a factor of 10 or even 100, in fact it probably equals the average families total budget for everything they need in life, including paying off the house and the car.

      The M$ marketing delusions, the nodding heads on parade yet again, why not paint them all beige and call them really really really 'HUGE' 'Zuney' screens and they can target all the marketing at ballmer's uncle.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:It's all about marketing by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      I said once prices dropped. I wouldn't be surprised to see multitouch screens in 5 years at the same price as lcd screens are now.

    18. Re:It's all about marketing by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I'm a huge Apple fanboy, but this is just cool. Yes, it's based on previous (very high end) technology, but the fact is that MS is doing something new and innovative. They're actually putting together the pieces to make something some of us have thought about, that we've read about in books* and seen in movies. Let's give credit where credit is due.

      And if they get these out into the market place by the end of the year, it's going to be hard to call it vaporware. I don't care if it's bespoke or each unit is made by hand, or if their "partnering" with certain customers to further demonstrate the technology. Production is production, even if it's not mass production.

      Now, as an Apple fanboy, I really hope that one of Bill's partners on this is Apple. I think that the the two companies could make something really incredible with this if they could put together a team that combined each company's strengths. Failing that, I hope Apple copies the shit out of this! =)

      *I'm thinking of the floor screen in Diamond Age.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  27. Looks like a movie representation by Nymz · · Score: 1

    In the movies, most any movie where people are using some screen only device, it is only to convey the message or action to the audience, not to actually do work. Sure, maybe some interactive advertising expensive display in a place of bussiness, but other than that it can't do anything. How could one possibly convey anything but the most simple, and expected, communications with such a device? Try it yourself, just walk around today pointing at things instead of talking, and see how "easy" that is.

    1. Re:Looks like a movie representation by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      The most relevant movie here is of course Minority Report, which is noteworthy for having put some research into their futuristic tech to have realistic interface.
      And because this can't be linked to often enough from this story: check out Jeff Han's progress with this at http://youtube.com/watch?v=ysEVYwa-vHM
      Note especially the on-screen keyboard he at one point gets up. I saw this at another video too, which demonstrated a pretty cool gesture for text entry; you placed all your fingers on the screen in a typing position, and the keyboard popped up, correctly sized to your hands. It would be a pain for prolonged text entry, but it could be plenty for annoting pictures and maps, socializing, etc.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  28. vaperware to steal Apple's press by boxlight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft has a long history of announcing new technologies long before they really exist in order to prevent a competitor from gaining marketing hype and momentum. This strategy goes right back to the earliest Windows versions -- you can read lots about this from an MS programmer's perspective in Barbarians.

    Since Apple is about to announce their "top secret" features in Leopard, it seems obvious it will be this sort of touch screen technology and that Microsoft is trying to steal Apple's thunder by announcing this vaperware.

    boxlight

    1. Re:vaperware to steal Apple's press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1- It's vapor. With an O.
      2- I've been fortunate enough to see the prototypes in the MS visitor center a couple of times in the past 2 years. It was cool. It was real. I didn't smell any vapers.

    2. Re:vaperware to steal Apple's press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1- It's vapour. With an OU.
      2- It's a touch-sensitive screen that can cope with more than one input; I've played with one of those in the Science museum.

    3. Re:vaperware to steal Apple's press by syukton · · Score: 1

      This isn't vaporware, I'm sitting right next to one.

      Oh, and using it is about 10 times cooler than seeing it in a video.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  29. Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming ... by SABME · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Back in 1980, when I was a hardcore high school AD&D player, my friends and I used to talk about how great it would be to have a table, with a computer inside, for gaming.

    At the time, there were some utilities that could help with housekeeping in the game, but it was really clunky to have a whole computer there behind the DM's screen. Imagine, your character sheet and virtual dice right in front of you; automated tracking for dice rolls, combat and spell recovery; fancy graphics for your map, characters, and monsters; maybe even a soundtrack and audio effects.

    And yes, WoW has all the features I just described, and more, but the element of everyone getting together around a table and playing face-to-face cannot be replaced.

    Needless to say, I want one of these, especially for when I retire and go back to gaming full-time :-).

  30. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll run out and buy one just as soon as I finish installing Microsoft Bob.

  31. Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Apple has been patenting the hell out of the multitouch UI concept, and I can't imagine this is going to slip by Steve Jobs without a fight. Apple purchased FingerWorks and owns most of the concepts shown in that video.

    Hidden in the recent demo for the Iphone was a glimpse of Apple's multitouch technology. If you knew where to look, it was hidden in plain site during the demo of the photo album and rolodex functions.

    1. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is more than one way to implement a solution, just because this is similar to what Fingerworks did doesn't mean they are infringing on patents. I do believe Jeff Han was developing this (for a while) at the same time as Apple were putting the technology into a phone.

    2. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Apple has been patenting the hell out of the multitouch UI concept, and I can't imagine this is going to slip by Steve Jobs without a fight. Apple purchased FingerWorks and owns most of the concepts shown in that video.

      The Surface has been in development since 2001, it uses multi-touch technology completely different from the one on the iphone. Not to mention there was multitouch interfaces before Apple and before Microsoft.

      Plus I want to see Apple sue Microsoft about it. They don't stand a chance.

    3. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I can't see Apple not having a fight over this. They own both patents for multi-touch and touch gestures. Someone please dig out the patents.

    4. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      aren't they getting together later on today to have a public meeting?
      Maybe Steve could settle this the manly way.

      CAGE FIGHT!

      Just hope Ballm er doesn't come running out with a chair.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just let an european start the project and you won't have to worry about software patents ;)

    6. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Poromenos1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      owns most of the concepts

      Am I the only one who finds this sentence disturbing?

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    7. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Rytr23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah.. I think it uses 5 cameras under the screen to track movement etc.. I doubt there is more than 1 camera in the iPhone let alone 5 behind the screen

      --
      So many injustices..so little time..
    8. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cool kids don't care about patents anymore - they sold off all of their morals to save up for an iPhone.

    9. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dig em out yourself... lazy bastard...

    10. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I am sure Apple and Microsoft have some sort of Patent trade agrement in place Ill let you use this pattent for this case and you let me use that patent for this case. This kinda stuff happends all the time between large buisness, that can afford a pattent. But for a small business Patents are expensive $500.00 by doing it yourself Over $2000 with a Patent atterney. For Apple and MS Pattents are cheap for the benefit. For a small company or an individual it is a major investment with a risky benefit. I am sure the Apple lawers are probably knocking on Microsoft door shoing their pattents and go are you willing to trade.

      If microsoft was useing these patents for a competing iPhone or for the next version of Zune then Apple may be more strict with Microsoft about use of these pattents and require more money, more pattent rights or a flat out no you cant use it. Like the iPod scroll wheel which the reason no one else has it is because it belongs to Apple.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. There's a ton of people who want to have free access to the hard work and research of others, and all because its not tangible but digital information. There seems to be some magic line that makes intellectual property not worth protecting in these folks minds.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    12. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Apple has been patenting the hell out of the multitouch UI concept

      There's more than one way to do multitouch. Plenty enough for Microsoft, Apple, Perceptive Pixel (Jeff Han's company), and probably half a dozen groups at MIT to do very similar things in different ways. Unfortunately, all of them but Han claims (in marketing-speak) to have invented the idea, but then everyone on the web saw Han's video first, so they think he invented the idea and everyone else is copying him. Sigh.

      Hidden in the recent demo for the Iphone was a glimpse of Apple's multitouch technology. If you knew where to look, it was hidden in plain site during the demo of the photo album and rolodex functions.

      "Hidden"? It was specifically talked about as a feature of the phone.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    13. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just hope Ballm er doesn't come running out with a chair.

      I don't get it.

    14. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by ThEATrE · · Score: 0

      Here's a magic line

      ----- it leads to my butt ----> (.)

      Kiss it like you love it.

    15. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by swillden · · Score: 1

      There seems to be some magic line that makes intellectual property not worth protecting in these folks minds.

      Your perspective is backwards. Given that ideas and expressions are infinitely replicable and therefore can never suffer from scarcity, and given that allowing nature to take its course and replicate them enriches mankind, it's necessary to justify why society should spend time and money artificially preventing their replication.

      I believe there *are* good reasons, BTW, but the protection we grant them -- and spend good money to enforce -- must be shown to be justified by the good it does society as a whole, since it's society as a whole that invests in protecting them and is potentially damaged by its decision to restrict them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    16. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The iPhone multi-touch patents are already quite specific, and will become more specific as they go through reviews before being approved. There is plenty of prior art in this field - MERL (Mitsubishi) went public with DiamondTouch at a conference in 2001 and it appears to have been well under development already at that point. There are a number of other companies with products on the market already, which others posting here have mentioned. So Apple is not much of a threat on the patent front.

    17. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.

      FingerWorks' patents covered IIRC capaciative multitouch input.

      The Lemur is another multitouch company that uses a different method (needing slightly more force).

      MS's tech uses a series of IR cameras for the higher res imaging.

      Obviously theres a metric assload of prior art on "poking your computer display with multiple fingers".

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    18. Re:Expect Apple to unleash the Legal Nazgul by martinX · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds this sentence disturbing?

      Yes. Please present yourself for re-education. Koolaid will be supplied to all participants.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  32. I could see how this could be a problem. by paranatural2002 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When you place your wi-fi enabled digital camera on the table, for example, Surface 'sees' the camera and does something extraordinary: It pulls your digital pictures and videos out onto the table for you to look at, move, edit or send. Images literally spill out in a pool of color. I'm sure everyone at Starbucks wants to see my 'home movies' of me and my dog. On a more serious note, isn't this a bit fishy? It grabs your stuff without even asking? Isn't that...you know, bad?

  33. FTFA by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

    forget the keyboard and mouse: The next generation of computer interfaces will be hands-on. That is THE stupidest thing I've read all day, and I've been to fark!

    Now, excuse me while I try to nudge my mouse with my mouth...
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:FTFA by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Your keyboard and mouse will be virtual. You'll be typing away on the top of your table. I'm not quite sure what the virtual mouse will be used for (using it to click and drag will be a bit redundant when you can just use your fingers), but we can keep it just for tradition.

      What I think would be fun would be to have a virtual adding machine (instead of a num pad) with the crank handle and the whirring sound,and the virtual paper tape coming out of the top.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  34. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by Pontiac · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was exciting and appeared to work much better when I saw it for the first time last year.
    Check out the Jeff Han video from last year then watch the MS video.. The original is a much smoother interface.
    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/65

    Yeah MS added some fluff by making it interact with devices placed on top the the basic idea is not some new "Top Secret" project

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  35. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by moderatorrater · · Score: 0

    Actually, the coffee cup manufacturer would write the driver, that's the advantage of using Microsoft!

  36. MS Innovate? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. You're absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you actually want to get some work done, a keyboard is just about the fastest thing there is (assuming that you're a decent typist of course). Voice recognition still doesn't work well enough for most of the stuff I do.

    Trying to read from a horizontal surface is just another way to get bad posture.

    For someone who actually uses a computer as a computer, this new display/input device is going nowhere. As far as using it at home, forget it. A coffee table that I can't pile stuff on ... what a waste of floor space.

    So, you're right, we emacs users would indeed just get frustrated by this gadget.

    1. Re:You're absolutely right! by Nevynxxx · · Score: 1

      For someone who actually uses a computer as a computer, this new display/input device is going nowhere. As far as using it at home, forget it. A coffee table that I can't pile stuff on ... what a waste of floor space.

      But how about people who want to use a computer in a different way?

      I can see uses for this, from displaying maps when playing DnD to RTS games, multiplayer C&C anyone?
    2. Re:You're absolutely right! by bluetentacle · · Score: 1

      Four-hand RTS, sounds both terribly unfair and terribly fun.

  38. Hisory of Multitouch Interface by bjunee · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Hisory of Multitouch Interface by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      He left out an important one-- Richard Greene published a paper on it in 1985: "Richard Greene, The drawing prism: a versatile graphic input device, Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.103-110, July 1985," and I saw one of his early custom built models not long after that at the Exploratorium in San Francisco. In fact, he's still making them here. In his case, he uses water on paint brushes (or any available bright object, including fingers) to implement a more artist-friendly paintbox application.

  39. Reactable by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 2, Informative

    You seem to be thinking of Reactable. The main difference is that Reactable uses a camera and fiducial symbols. Reactable is really a great and low-cost system, which works fairly well (just sketching one of the symbols with marker got it recognizable). They've segregated the optical processing and the application layer very well from what I could tell, which should lead to clean and easy apps.

    MS appears to be using a combination, as the guy showed some optical symbols on the bottom of objects as well.

    1. Re:Reactable by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      That would be it. Thanks!

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
  40. Popular Mechanics by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the magazine that, in the 50's, said we'd all be using flying cars by the turn of the century?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  41. Tron? by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Tron, didn't the CEO guy have the display built into his office desk, with a recessed membrane-style keyboard?

    Granted it only displayed VT-100, but it was still the first example I remember of a useful PC built into the furniture.

    (yes, those old coctail arcade machines were cool (especially tennis) but I don't consider them a "PC")

    1. Re:Tron? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      MU-Columbia had (and may still have) a computer lab with Sun kit built into desks, so that you would look down into the CRT through a clear acrylic surface. This was in 1997 when I was visiting different universities.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Tron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "PC" ?
      Did you mean "workstation" ?

    3. Re:Tron? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      But do you consider all of the cocktail arcade machines that have PCs inside to run Mame to be a "PC"?

    4. Re:Tron? by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Check out "The Island" there is a scene with Sean Bean and Ewen McGregor using a multi-touch multi-user desktop, although Beans character is using a wireless "mouse"(looks like a mini-pyramid). But McGregor uses a pen like device to draw a boat. I thought it was cool....

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    5. Re:Tron? by retrorogue · · Score: 1

      Wow, way off. ;) It was a full touchscreen display built in to the desk and looked a lot like this (though the one in Tron was of course just a prop that simulated it through scripted images and projection on the glass). The keyboard was actually displayed on the touch screen and tapped, and the "graphics" were full color multimedia (i.e. what we have now), not VT100.

    6. Re:Tron? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I knew I had seen that before, and I was trying to remember where. Yes, Tron. Nice call. I think what it makes it feasible these days is, perhaps, the flat LCD screens... although, if you're reading slashdot, it's mostly probable you never use the space under the coffee table for anything useful... in fact, who uses the space under a coffee table?

    7. Re:Tron? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      in fact, who uses the space under a coffee table?


      {raises hand}

      Sometimes I'll sit on the floor, back against the couch, legs sticking under the coffee table. Not often, but sometimes I want to eat and watch a movie.

      Some coffee tables have a double-deck arrangement, with the table part on top and a floor on the bottom, and people will put board games or other things on the lower deck. Other coffee tables have small cubbyholes for storing random things.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  42. Why is this tech not in Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If Apple can squeeze the same thing into a battery powered iPhone, why can't MS squeeze it into a Zune, instead of bolting a computer and a projector under my coffee table?

    This is similar to having a coffee percolator that runs on a lawnmower engine.

    I mean, Apple doesn't have nearly the manpower of Microsoft, yet they've got a product coming out next month that delivers this technology and fits it into your pocket. Someone at MS must be saying "Well, we tried, I guess."

  43. Guess What Bill said? by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    that's the dumbest fucking idea I've heard since I've been at Microsoft

  44. similar gesture interface to iPhone by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Its just that MicroSoft could miniturize their iPhone clone as much as Apple could, so they change the name to a "table".

  45. No they copied it from Jeff Han by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/65
    It's all Jeff's work, the zoom, the rotate all the gestures...

    His company is here:
    http://www.perceptivepixel.com/

    Looks like they've simply licensed it and removed all mention of the original designers.

  46. Very limited applications by BrewedInTexas · · Score: 1

    I've been following table top computing for a while. It's capable of some pretty amazing things but it runs out of applications quickly.

    You cannot use text on the screen because of perspective issues. Sure you might be able to read upside down text but it gets annoying quickly.

    It can only be used by one person at a time. The killer app for this would collaboration and meetings related...stuff. But it becomes nearly impossible to track the actions of different users.

    There was an interesting lecture on the University of Washington Computer Science and Engineering series on the Research Channel about the subject with a lecturer from (surprise, surprise) Microsoft Research.

    1. Re:Very limited applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're wrong.

      They had tabletop computer games in the late 1970s and early '80s, popular in bars. Pong had scores going both ways so each person had their score (and the word "score") righside up.

      Similarly, PacMan and Space Invaders tables had "take turn" modes where you could compete. When Player 2 came up, the display would reverse, but likewise the scores for both players were right side up for both players.

      This isn't a new concept by any means.

      -mcgrew

  47. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    the basic idea is not some new "Top Secret" project
    Hence my wiggling with "more-or-less".
    Solomon is spot on:

    The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be;
    and that which is done is that which shall be done:
    and there is no new thing under the sun.
    (Ecclesiastes 1:9)
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  48. Didn't Sun do this already? by mediis · · Score: 1

    I swear I saw a video from the 90's where Sun was saying this was the future of the desktop.

  49. Re:Inovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Innovation at Microsoft:
    (Score:2)
    by FredDC (1048502) on Wednesday May 30, @09:41AM (#19320673)
    Tilt the screen at a different angle!

    Similar tech
    (Score:1)
    by TequilaMonster (321655) on Wednesday May 30, @09:42AM (#19320697)
    (http://www.alanmacdonald.com/index.html)
    There were some videos a while back of a similar system being demo'd. It showed a system which allowed for multiple simultaneous touches to be detected, so you could actually grab a photograph and resize it by pulling the corners. You could give commands by chording touches on the screen. It looked really interesting, but I can't find it anymore - anybody know where I can find them again?

    Wow...
    (Score:1)
    by john g the 4th (1040350) on Wednesday May 30, @09:49AM (#19320779)
    Brought to you by the people who created such great products as Windows ME, and Windows Vista; we have the most expensive computer you've ever spilled liquid on! Seriously.. by the time this really hits the commercial market (I would say 2 years), the linux version will be better.

    Congratulations, Microsoft
    (Score:1)
    by wumpus188 (657540) on Wednesday May 30, @09:50AM (#19320809)
    1970 called, it wants its four wheel drive PC back.

    I've seen this before...
    (Score:1)
    by KevDude (115267) on Wednesday May 30, @09:52AM (#19320845)
    (http://www.vnetwork.com/Portal/Members/khill)
    Sounds like the Reactable synthesizer [upf.edu]. Cool demo video here [youtube.com]. The original looks way more fun than checking into a hotel too...

    vaperware to steal Apple's press
    (Score:2)
    by boxlight (928484) on Wednesday May 30, @09:57AM (#19320899)
    Microsoft has a long history of announcing new technologies long before they really exist in order to prevent a competitor from gaining marketing hype and momentum. This strategy goes right back to the earliest Windows versions -- you can read lots about this from an MS programmer's perspective in Barbarians [amazon.ca].

    Since Apple is about to announce their "top secret" features in Leopard, it seems obvious it will be this sort of touch screen technology and that Microsoft is trying to steal Apple's thunder by announcing this vaperware.

    boxlight

    Wow...
    (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30, @09:57AM (#19320911)
    I'll run out and buy one just as soon as I finish installing Microsoft Bob.

    My point proven /. I get flaimbait and you mod all of the Linux fanboys up.

  50. Mr Blobby by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Firstly, let me say I think the software demos look fantastic. However...

    Is it just me, or does the choice of hardware technologies seem a bit, well, crappy? Back projection - that means the table itself is huge underneath - if you're eating in a restaurant you want a table you can streach your legs under.

    And infa-red cameras tracking the movement..? Notice when they do the paint demo - it looks like the system isn't actually very accurate. They do blobby finger painting, but if I was going to buy ones of these I would want something I could draw fine, accurate lines on with a pen. And I'm not convinced of the idea of having to put barcodes on everything so the system can recognise them.

    Surely a flat-screen technology (TFT, Plasma, whatever) coupled with one of the newer multi-touch sensitive technologies would be better?

    1. Re:Mr Blobby by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      if you're eating in a restaurant you want a table you can streach your legs under.

      And when I'm eating in a restaurant, I don't want my table to flash subliminal messages at me when my drink is low.

    2. Re:Mr Blobby by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      And when I'm eating in a restaurant, I don't want my table to flash subliminal messages at me when my drink is low. However, when I'm eating in a restaurant, I do want my table to flash subliminal messages at the waitress when my drink is low.
      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    3. Re:Mr Blobby by glindsey · · Score: 1

      First of all, you need to remember that they're balancing technology with cost. A 30-inch diagonal TFT LCD coupled with a new multi-touch sensitive system is almost certainly going to be more expensive than back-projection and infrared cameras.

      Second, as far as I've seen from Han's page, other multi-touch systems like FTIR don't seem to be able to distinguish between different kinds of objects -- for example, he notes that it can't distinguish between a thumb and forefinger right now. This is something the infrared cameras can do with some simple image processing.

      Those are my guesses, anyway.

    4. Re:Mr Blobby by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Surely a flat-screen technology (TFT, Plasma, whatever) coupled with one of the newer multi-touch sensitive technologies would be better?

      Microsoft is doing it this way because that's what they have patented and/or bought. Also, many multi-touch technologies effectively require rear-projection. Otherwise the display layer has to be behind the touch layer, rather than projected onto it. It means the point on screen that you mean to touch and the point on the table that you have to touch are separated by half an inch or more, breaking the illusion and the precision. Not so good in a $10,000 device.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    5. Re:Mr Blobby by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does the choice of hardware technologies seem a bit, well, crappy? Back projection - that means the table itself is huge underneath - if you're eating in a restaurant you want a table you can streach your legs under. How about something like this?
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:Mr Blobby by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Surely a flat-screen technology (TFT, Plasma, whatever) coupled with one of the newer multi-touch sensitive technologies would be better?


      Um, not really.

      First thing to note is that it is not 'multi-touch', but image sensing input, so it can distiguish all aspects of a hand, pen, or recognize items placed on the surface, this is far far beyond a multi-point touch screen technology.

      This also means that with work, barcodes on the items will not always be necessary, as the system will eventually be able to image recognize devices, however this will be an evolution, just like developing drivers for every device.

      The second thing is they are using DLP for imaging. DLP has features over Plasma and LCD in both refresh speed, contrast ratios, etc.(Anyone that owns a projector for watching movies and using their computer in the last 5 years knows the benefits of DLP.)

      I don't know how thin this specific device will get, but a rear projected image can get fairly thin using a distorted directional optical system, so they could make the display a couple of inches thick if needed. Go look up some of the new DLP display technologies that are being pushed for mobile devices, because they can get the size down to smaller than most people expect.

    7. Re:Mr Blobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't sound very subliminal

    8. Re:Mr Blobby by gig · · Score: 1

      They should have built it into a table TOP, not a table. Just the flat part, flat like a screen.

      You ought to be able to take Microsoft Surface out of a big flat box and screw on whatever legs you want, or build it into a counter top or bar. The display should be flat and the touch should be an invisible layer on top.

      However that would be if it was a real product. Then you would have a reason to do all that design work, make it better, more useful, sell more, make a profit.

      When you compare this to the iPhone it is like the same product from two different centuries.

      The resolution on Microsoft Surface is said to be only 1024x768, you can't buy a computer with that low resolution for a few years now. The iPhone screen has 1/4 as many pixels, and you can buy 10-20 iPhones for the price of one Microsoft Surface, or 10 iPhones and 5 iMacs and an iPod shuffle.

    9. Re:Mr Blobby by gig · · Score: 1

      How did they solve this in the iPhone, then? You can get 20 of them for $10,000.

      There is a company that you send them your iMac they send it back with a touch screen on it. These guys are like in a garage somewhere. At no time will you find a rear-projection system installed in your iMac due to this.

      Microsoft is doing such outrageous low-tech and poor design you have to make an ass out of yourself just to try and defend it.

      Ir cameras and rear-projection? Surely this is the multi-touch screen of the 1970's. If you put a picture of Microsoft Surface on Wikipedia I would think it was 30 years old, even before I saw the iPhone.

      Surface is like a stunt some geeks pull at a convention ... "this year we built a finger-painting table out of an old projection TV and pieces of an HP CAT scanner."

    10. Re:Mr Blobby by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      How did they solve this in the iPhone, then? You can get 20 of them for $10,000.

      That should be a clue that they used a different technique. Which we already knew from context. I'm not intimately familiar with Apple's patent filings or those of Fingerworks (whom they purchased), else I'd tell you exactly how it works. However, I do know that it is unlike the FTIR (frustrated total internal reflection) technique used by Jeff Han and the similar approach used by Microsoft, which require rear projection and do not scale down to iPhone-size. Similarly, I would doubt that what is used in the iPhone would scale up to 40+ inches. Just because two technologies appear similar does not mean they are interchangeable.

      There is a company that you send them your iMac they send it back with a touch screen on it. These guys are like in a garage somewhere. At no time will you find a rear-projection system installed in your iMac due to this.

      TrollTouch will install a single-point analog resistive touchscreen. This is not multi-touch.

      Microsoft is doing such outrageous low-tech and poor design you have to make an ass out of yourself just to try and defend it.

      Who is defending it? All I said was that they did it they way they did because of certain limitations the poster wasn't aware of. The only "attacking" here is you.

      Ir cameras and rear-projection? Surely this is the multi-touch screen of the 1970's.

      I'll point out that even the wildy popular video of Jeff Han's demo uses a camera and rear projection. You clearly know nothing of the problems involved, and the existing research. Or maybe you'd like to cite an example of multi-touch from the 70s, which is earlier than any that I've ever heard of.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    11. Re:Mr Blobby by amokk · · Score: 1

      What in the hell are you talking about?

      Have you even looked at specs on the more recent plasma and LCD TVs? We aren't talking about panels from 5 years ago here man. Plasma has had contrast ratios and brightness levels higher than DLP for a number of years nows. Additionally, Plasma screen refresh is ultra freaking fast. LCD has not stagnated either. Nowadays, midrange LCD panels are getting extremely respectable and, as with plasmas, have had contrast ratios and brightness levels far higher than DLP.

      Get a clue man. DLP, compared to competing technologies, started to fall behind months ago. It is unlikely that it will ever catch up.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    12. Re:Mr Blobby by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Have you even looked at specs on the more recent plasma and LCD TVs?

      Yes, and DLP has ALSO improved. The thing most people seem to forget about plasma, is they 'degrade' in picture quality over time, as in 5-10 years. So go pet your new plasma and tell yourself how proud you bought the 'best' technology, then in 5 years when it starts to washout, you can go buy a new one, or maybe look at DLP technology.

      Plasma and LCD are great for a flat TV. PERIOD. They are NOT the best technology for displaying images. Rear and Front projection DLP are much better technologies in the 'lower cost' spectrum.

    13. Re:Mr Blobby by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      This also means that with work, barcodes on the items will not always be necessary, as the system will eventually be able to image recognize devices, however this will be an evolution, just like developing drivers for every device.

      I'm thinking RFID tags for some items.

      Furthermore (in support of your point) you can't do holographic projection with a LCD or Plasma screen.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    14. Re:Mr Blobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoops, forgot to close a tag. sorry.

  51. Ob by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wireless. Same size as a sofa table. Lame.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  52. I suspect by KKlaus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this emerged at least partially out of their previous efforts with "media pcs." On of the obvious (but largely unspoken) problem they ran into there is that the PC with mouse and keyboard is just a shitty way to interact with media. Touchscreens, on the other hand, obviously aren't. So I think that despite the fact that they are initially of course selling this only to businesses, that will be the ultimate placement of this technology. It finally allows people to look at video, music, photos, etc, on a living room computer in a way that doesn't clash immensely with the intended atmosphere of the room. So bravo to Microsoft for making an appealing product, it'll be interesting to see what Apple's response is if this table ultimately becomes successful, as media is one of Apple's important domains. But either way, it's one of the few times MS may not be lying when they say a new paradigm is arriving. Should be fun to watch.

    --
    Relax I just want some peanuts.
    1. Re:I suspect by ddocjohn · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine Apple's response is already in the making. Multitouch and resolution independence in the next OSX (as seen in iPhone), along with the other - undoubtedly luscious - secret features which will be unsecretified at WWDC in a week.

    2. Re:I suspect by gig · · Score: 1

      Apple's response to this is the iPhone, and possibly more iPhone-like Macs when Leopard ships.

      If there is a new paradigm here, it is the very first multi-touch screen that is not sexy.

  53. Challenge to programmers by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    I bet someone can beat MS at their own game, and do this for 1 grand. I also dare the F/OSS community to create the software for this feat that works with an existing touch interface.

    1. Re:Challenge to programmers by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      One grand is a bit on the low side. You need a projector and a camera at the very least. Not sure how smart it is to link there from slashdot, but check out http://www.multitouch.nl/ which blogs a student project where they create one of these screens. FTIR screens are actually relatively simple to make, they even have a HOWTO document, and I've seen several similar ventures around the net.
      I'm actually interested in this field, and wanted to do look into making one of these at my uni, but now I'm sure everyone will look at it and go "ZOMG, a Microsoft screen!" Thank you so much, Microsoft.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  54. What else is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sonycsl.co.jp/person/rekimoto/as/

    I didn't know Microsoft bought SONY.

  55. Re:Amazing work. I want one, like now. by the_wesman · · Score: 1

    Now to get it into a package that is thinner and doesn't require the supporting table.


    done.

    --
    calling all destroyers
  56. useful? by theTrueMikeBrown · · Score: 1

    Someone please enlighten me because I am obviously not getting the point. What new capability that was previously nonexistent does this product provide? Additionally, how is this an economically sound product? Will it ever be? "I for one..." will probably not buy this product.

  57. Yes, they've embraced and extended it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes they've added a few bits then pretended to be the inventor.

    It's perceptive pixels work.

  58. Other Articles by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is actually quite interesting technology. It has been conceived before - but only that - conceived. This is one time Microsoft gets kudos.

    Not quite. Even tho Microsoft was the first to market with something in the $10,000 range for places like Vegas. I wonder what the Blue Screens look like?

    More info the MS product here, here and here.

    I imagine that Jeff Han's own Fascinating multi-touch system just might not use Windows as a fundamental foundation. Don't forget about the 16 foot long interactive wall So I can imagine several patent fights coming out of this, even though the research lines are likely independent. Microsoft might even get accused of stealing somebody else's research, regardless of the facts.

    Of course, this happens a little while after Apple revealed their own multitouch interface. Microsoft must hate that. After all, Microsoft can't get a patent on the use of fingers, even tho they can try.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Other Articles by electron_plumber · · Score: 2, Informative

      MERL's DiamondTouch has been on sale for over a year! Not only is it a large multitouch interface, it's the only one that can tell who is touching where! (That's kind of critical if you want to let people use different tools at the same time.) Check out http://youtube.com/watch?v=t35HXAjNW6s for a video of DT in action..

    2. Re:Other Articles by jadin · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Even tho Microsoft was the first to market with something in the $10,000 range for places like Vegas. I wonder what the Blue Screens look like? Yeah.. but this is Microsoft, probably costs them $50,000 to make.
    3. Re:Other Articles by stonecypher · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder what the Blue Screens look like?
      I'd imagine they're fairly blue.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    4. Re:Other Articles by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the Blue Screens look like?

      I think that's the question everyone who uses MS products is wondering. I, for one, was very disappointed with the Vista BSOD. If this thing runs Vista (which I'm guessing it does), people are going to be awfully upset with the way it looks when it crashes.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    5. Re:Other Articles by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      I don't think this is special because we're seeing any "new" technologies here. It's special because of how the technology is implemented. Yes, at its core it's just a $5-10k computer with a large display and a multi-touch interface. But how they've managed to take various techs and put them together, it's pretty dang cool.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    6. Re:Other Articles by Alien54 · · Score: 1

      >I wonder what the Blue Screens look like?

      >>I'd imagine they're fairly blue.

      Darn. I wanted them to be red for a change. A nice color to inspire panic.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  59. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by eshefer · · Score: 1

    actually...

    The MS thingy looks like a cross between The MIT's media lab Sensetable configuration and Jeff Hans gesture interaction software. Apart for the table reacting to the wifi products (specificly the camera) I didn't see anything that wasn;t copied from someone else there.

  60. You know what's really funny? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    Somewhere right now Jeff Hawkins is pissed. There's stolen thunder, and then there's corporate neutering. Will Jeff's device announcement even make the front page of Slashdot now?

  61. Re:Amazing work. I want one, like now. by witte · · Score: 1

    > This is so "Star Trek" to the geek in me.
    This needs an LCARS gui :)

  62. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    What's next, a pointing device that you can slide around and click things with?

    Yes, they're working on that. It's going to be called the 'rat'.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  63. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by Egatlov · · Score: 1

    The main difference between this and the traditional touch screens you're used to seeing is the multiple touch resolution. I've read that this uses an array of infrared cameras to do the touch sensing, which if true, is quite innovative. This table can detect AND resolve at least 8 touches, from pictures I've seen.

    Many of the interface movements have been shown in the Jeff Han demonstrations as well as the iPhone demos. Maybe, just maybe, that's because they are very natural movements when you have a touchscreen capable of resolving and tracking multiple fingers?

    I don't see any indication Jeff Han is involved with this. As far as I know his screen uses a true touch sensing method, nothing with infrared cameras. Also, Microsoft is spinning off a startup to develop this, while Jeff Han has his own company to commercialize his IP.

    I'm no Microsoft fan, but here their research labs have gathered some technology that have not been implemented on a consumer device and brought it much closer to the average user. They run 10k right now, mostly sold to casino's and T-mobile, so it's not quite a consumer device yet. However, at 10k it's pretty damn close, that's what the Lisa computer (a precursor to the PC) first sold for.

  64. does it come with pac-man? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Any table-top display is not complete unless it runs pac-man, and you can eat pizza off of it. That's the version I want!

    Just let me pop in my all-Rush mixtape, and grab my bottle of New Coke...

    --
    stuff |
  65. Update (Yeah To Jeff Han) by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    Someone else posted this link AC.
    It really shows haw far he's gone with it.
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=ysEVYwa-vHM

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  66. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by Steven+Reddie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think anyone (including Microsoft) is saying they invented the technology. That doesn't make the product any less interesting. Sometimes it takes a big company to realize ideas of people who have little chance of bringing the idea to fruition. A table-top computer is hardly a novel idea, but something a lot of people have been waiting for a long time.

  67. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by samkass · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it's built from the same Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Hydrogen that everything else is built from, too! Jeez, can't Microsoft come up with some original atoms to use???

    --
    E pluribus unum
  68. Cool possibilities for architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work in the A&E field, and having a drafting board like this (though with a stylus) would be _very_ cool, indeed. Bump up that resolution (150-200dpi, like my laptop) and make it in a 16:10 with 26" or 32" vertical dimension and it would be a lot like drafting on paper. The extra real estate with a 16:9 would allow a real size "sheet" of space with room on the side for toolbars and/or palettes. I drool just thinking about it.

    Oh, sure, you'd need an insane adapter to drive it (with about 4800x7680 resolution - QuadHD), but that's just the way things are. Now that I come to think of it, it might be useful for digital photo/image manipulation. At 200dpi, you could work with the images from the newest Hasselblad digitals at 1:1 pixel mapping. And, hey, if you've got $32k to drop on a camera body, you may as well pony up for the post processing, right?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by metlin · · Score: 1

      Since you mentioned architecture - a project I did when I was in grad school for an HCI class, called ArchiTech. You might find the section on aDesk to be of interest. :)

    2. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      This isn't something you can't do with a screen and a stylus. This thing's strength is the multitouch capability...

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    3. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You're right, I didn't read deep enough into TFA. It's everything that's annoying about Windows ("Hi, I see you have a digital camera! Would you like to download the pictures!?!) with a bunch of useless eyecandy (oooh! you can see the pictures actually _moving_ into the stroage device!) and a PAN with higher speed access than bluetooth. Yawn.

      Yes, it has applications for what they said, and I'm sure it may help out for certain transactions. It's more cinema-kitch than practical, though. I mean, I suppose if you use it in a restaurant to order you might get to pay a lower bill since you won't need to tip the waiter. But the cost to buy and - here's the expensive part - custom program for your application will severely cut into its application for all but the biggest multi-site corporations.

      It might have been useful. Oh well. I'm sure I'll see them popping up all over the place eventually, as person-to-person interactions get less and less common.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by lemon_dieter · · Score: 0

      Everybody I know who uses CAD professionally uses a keyboard to type commands...it's faster and gives them more time to read slashdot. How is having a shiny table with an interactive surface going to make an engineer's job easier? Remember that when you draw a line, it has start and end exactly where you want it to start and end. That's what the num pad is for. I cannot see this new shiny interactive table aiding in the precision that real CAD demands; it seems to just complicate input.

      Isn't one of the tenets of engineering that a pragmatic approach to design lends to the most economical results?

      --
      Spending Resources on Defense leaves Less to defend.
    5. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Zwack · · Score: 1

      As I keep saying...

      Look at Cintiq

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    6. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by gig · · Score: 1

      If you drool thinking about this you want an Apple 30 Cinema Display and a big Wacom Tablet. In fact you can get a bunch of them for the price of one Microsoft Surface.

    7. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Well, on the contrary, I think this (or, well, something like this) could spur more person-to-person interaction, because of multitouch sensing. Imagine tabletop games you could gather round the table and play with your friends. It could also greatly help UIs, imagine having your windows lying around like you do pieces of paper, only you could zoom them in and out by using both hands. There would be no more switching in the traditional sense, if you don't need a window you just shrink it and push it aside, and get another one.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    8. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I suppose I can see the gaming aspect, but I probably wouldn't be willing to pay the cost of such a game (much less the table) - it would be a sideshow item at entertainment houses.

      I'm not really convinced that a windowed environment would be more efficient using this technology. In fact, I've found most iterations of "standard" MS windows to be less efficient as time has progressed. I still have my desktop set to the most basic classic form. I already use two hands to manipulate the screen with shortcut keys and my mouse. I have yet to see any real improvement in efficiency since NT3.51. I can smoke just about anyone using all windows tools in autocad manipulations because I know keystrokes, text commands, and shortcuts. In fact, most of the "efficiencies" in the UI have come at the cost of actual efficiency - when I turn on the bells and whistles that make it easier for the novice, I type so quickly that the program can't keep up. Most of what you are doing, while it does have certain advantages (resize and move both corners of a window simultaneously, of example), is just simple task switching, and can be keyboard commanded with fewer total movements by minimizing, restoring, or maximizing windows, or switching desktops in linux or some win desktop managers.

      Which brings us to the place where these things will be useful - simple operations for the novice. Enabling people who are afraid of mice and keyboards to perform very basic, easily scripted tasks. Of course, no complex manipulations will be useful in such an enviroment. Novices do terribly poorly at mouse gestures until they are taught the motions and practice them. Much of the efficiency will come from "knowing what the user means" when the windoes are sized/minimized/moved etc. I tend to turn such things off (html and smart directories in win, for example) because the process of undoing ro redoing an operation that is a "miss" by the UI is not worth the bother of learning the proper command or choosing the particular operation. Things are rarely labeled correctly (I spend countless hours retagging my ripped CDs to match my preferences) and often perform in ways which are non-optimal for the end user (I have only about 40-50 "artists" in my music collection, but my artist list in iTunes shows about 400 becuase I have a couple dozen comlipations - that's non-optimal in a very, very bad way).

      No, this will be good for very simple, specific operations - games, ordering systems, dedicated uses. Beyond that it's more of a flying-car-in-the-future kind of device.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Cool possibilities for architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      No, the 30" cinema monitor is too small, and I want it in a desk-like format with an integrated, transparent wacom surface. Kind of like the Cintiq monitor in the sibling post, but much much bigger.

      For architecture work, the ability to see full drawings, full size is pretty critical to making the final output as readable as possible. The ability to edit at that scale is - I'll admit - a bit of a luxury rather than a necessity. Also, even the 30" cinema (or Dell's similar model) cannot display a typical 7-8MP digicam photograph at 1:1 and still have room for palettes and toolbars that don't cover up the actual work. Of course, I couldn't use this or a 30" panel, as my primary machine only has a single-link DVI port (it's a laptop). The internal card can run the resolution, but the connection cannot (supposedly), so I suffice with a 24" lcd at 1920x1200, which matches the laptop screen so my "desk" workspace layout matches my "road" workspace layout. Yes, I'm not offically rambling...better get back to work!

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  69. A Chiropractor's dream by lastchance_000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My neck hurts just thinking about it.

    1. Re:A Chiropractor's dream by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      True, but many people do look at keys when typing.

    2. Re:A Chiropractor's dream by Maitri · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too - I was trying to figure out if the table top could be raised along one long edge like one of those artist's boards. (Additionally it would be neat if they could switch what side was up - which it maybe does, didn't watch the whole video to behonest...) That would be really cool!

  70. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    In what little I could see (the video kept borking on me), it's more than just a touch screen with visual effects. It looks like you can place other items on the screen and drag things to them (the PDA, for example). That's pretty keen. Mix this with some of the zoom stuff Jef Raskin was working on and the pinch-and-spread interface for zooming that the iPhone has, and this could be very cool to use.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  71. Finally! by irregular_hero · · Score: 1

    Ever since I painted my living room, I've been having trouble selecting coordinating furniture to my fire-engine red walls. I'd been searching for a nice coffee table with a bright blue top, but could never seem to find one in just the right shade.

    This looks like it just might be suitable -- I hear it's likely to turn a lovely shade of blue on a regular basis!

    1. Re:Finally! by Judg3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, you're quite the clever one, aren't you?
      I shall be just as clever:
      1999 called, it wants it's joke back.

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  72. Its a coffee table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. They've announce a product, not shipped it.
    2. Apple did the same for their multi-touch device (the iPhone) last year.
    3. It's a coffee table because of the way it works. Han's is a thin cheap flat detector and much bigger and flatter!
    4. None of those gestures, like the zoom, pan, rotate gesture they're using came from they, they're all copied.

    So Microsoft is doing what here? FUD'ing Apple with an unreleased product? Pretending to have invented stuff they've copied? Lying about researching for 5 years to block patents? What?

    http://www.perceptivepixel.com/

    1. Re:Its a coffee table by vought · · Score: 0, Troll

      So Microsoft is doing what here? FUD'ing Apple with an unreleased product? Pretending to have invented stuff they've copied

      I think it has a lot more to do with Bill Gates' insecurity and his appearance with Steve Jobs tonight at the D conference.

      "Look at us! We're cool and can do multi-touch interfaces too - and we can do them bigger than Apple!"

      Which proves, once again, that Microsoft isn't and won't ever be cool. Like the bully turned jock turned realtor turned city councilman, they've always been first on most people's lips and last in most people's hearts.

    2. Re:Its a coffee table by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS is developing a product that uses multitouch, among other things, that offers an entirely new means of user interaction. Apple, on the other hand, is using multitouch as a buzzword to create the image of revolutionary technology, despite the fact that it's barely multitouch (two inputs rather than one) and it does nothing new for the user. Frankly, it doesn't matter whether the MS gestures are copied or not, Apple's are too, because MS's device performs an entirely new function. I don't see how this can possibly be seen as "FUD'ing Apple" except in the eyes of a hopeless cheerleader. You did watch the video, didn't you?

      How do you know all the gestures are copied? Where are all the gestures documented?

  73. Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscreens by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many things look quite impressive in the context of a demo. The MIT Media Lab has been pulling off absolutely stunning demos for... is it a decade now? Very few of them have led directly to anything real. There's no way to tell whether this is the sort of thing like Clippy that is an impressive demo but not a useful product. But the comment that "the company's unofficial Surface showman, Jeff Gattis is a clean-cut fellow who is obviously the veteran of a thousand marketing seminars" is not confidence-inspiring. It would be much more impressive if they had demonstrated the product by letting half-a-dozen people, with no training, who had never seen the product before, try to use it.

    There are some very obvious practical issues. With a vertically-oriented touchscreen, the issue was what sort of gadget you could use to prop your hands so that your arms wouldn't be trembling an aching in half an hour.

    WIth a horizontally-oriented table-sized touch screen, the obvious issue is that if you put it under a thick sheet of Lexan it won't be touch-sensitive any more... and if you don't put it under a thick sheet of Lexan it won't be touch-sensitive for long.

    It would be an interesting contest to see whether one of these $10,000 gadgets lasts longer in a typical American home or in a "Starwood hotel, Harrah's casino or T-Mobile shops." I figure a week, tops, before someone spills a cocktail on it or tries to see whether they can operate it with their butt.

  74. Induction Recharging by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    That table would be really interesting if it could recharge devices laid on it, with "wireless power". Using magnetic induction, device batteries would have to include little rotors to "rewind" little charging dynamos pushed by rotating magnetic fields generated by the table. But that setup could banish incompatible, inefficient and schleppy wired power adapters. Devices wouldn't need to include charger HW in the product, so the entire mobile device economy could become more efficient. And portable "universal batteries" could recharge any mobile device, perhaps even allowing idle devices to export unused power to a dying device's battery.

    People might check into hotels just to "recharge their batteries", literally, not just a shower and a nap like today. Hourly hotel rates could be a lot less sleazy.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  75. Interesting ergonomics by BrerBear · · Score: 1

    As interesting as this development seems, I can't see myself wanting to use a device that requires me to lean over or look down for extended periods of time. The nice thing about current monitor/keyboard or laptop setups is that it allows a user to keep their head facing forward in a natural position and also provides a place to rest the arms that keeps them from tiring out. A vertical version of this unit would help the eyes and neck, but quickly tire the arms.

    Without any tactile feedback, it seems like a a user would always have to look down to use it. I could see its place in applications that only involved limited or intermittent interaction, but anything that needed constant attention (e.g. work) seems like it would quickly be a strain.

    1. Re:Interesting ergonomics by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Life has no room for tables.
      Unless these can be integrated into the tops of CRT monitors, this idea will go the way of WebTV.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  76. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by TheRagingTowel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow. Microsoft invented the touch screen. I'm impressed. What's next, a pointing device that you can slide around and click things with? Wiseass, this is a MULTI-POINT touch screen. This is a totally different approach than current touch-screens. More (amazing!) demonstrations of this concept here.
    --
    4Z5TX
  77. Applications by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a pong game on one of these. Or some weird DJ/VJ tools like the ReacTable wich BTW you can DIY.

    But I think that the first real killer app to go with it will be a digital roulette.

    1. Re:Applications by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1
      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  78. They still have no clue by Daishiman · · Score: 1

    What are these people doing demoing this product with stupid family pictures BS??

    This has the potential to be THE breakthrough for CAD, CAM, 3D and 2D design applications. Imagine using a CAD application with this interface. It'd be the fastest and most intuitive thing ever.

    Video compositing? Just drag and drop stuff, manage the effects layers naturally, etc.

    What they need to do is find a way to lower the price and start getting some developers to work on creating UI concepts for professional software.

    1. Re:They still have no clue by Zwack · · Score: 1
      CINTIQ!


      It is a heck of a lot cheaper and is used by graphic artists already... No reason it couldn't be used for CAD/CAM either.


      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    2. Re:They still have no clue by gig · · Score: 1

      > What are these people doing demoing this product with stupid family pictures BS??
      > This has the potential to be THE breakthrough for CAD, CAM, 3D and 2D design applications.

      If you can do CAD on a 1024x768 screen with finger-painting accuracy then you can just as easily do it in your head and do not need Microsoft Surface. It is not even a product, let alone professional design tool. You're wondering why people are using crayons with coloring books instead of drawing blueprints ... it's a crayon.

      These breakthroughs are going on but Microsoft has nothing to do with it.

  79. Buying a multi touch screen? by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    There are some places that do sell touch screens, and similar multi-touch screen technology. You can buy a multi touch screen right now but it won't be the same. Although the technology is quite different than Jeff Han's multi-touch screen, you can buy a similar multi touch screen from many suppliers.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  80. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

    Err...back in the early '80s, when I was a hardcore video game player, we had exactly that: tabletop games with a computer inside & 2 sets of controls. When you played 2-Player games, the screen would switch around to face the other side.

    Hmm...I wonder what happens when you put your drink on the MS table?

    Anyway, it's nice to see the wheel getting invented...again.

  81. Too small to use at NORAD by planetfinder · · Score: 1

    I guess the military could use 5 or 6 of these if you made
    them 10 times as big, raised the table height, and added long
    sticks to touch the surface and move things around. Otherwise
    who uses a coffee table on a regular basis ?
    It is so typical of Microsoft to solve a problem that doesn't exist or
    would only exist if we were living in the past.
    They should stick to their successful approach of following Apple's lead
    and forget about introducing new stuff.

    1. Re:Too small to use at NORAD by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      It's a projection display, so it can be any size, the vid in the article shows one larger than most whiteboards covering the width of the entire wall being used (one of Jeff Han's models).

      And as for the sticks, again, as shown in the vid, any object can be used to trigger the IR cameras sensors, and thus control the screen.

    2. Re:Too small to use at NORAD by planetfinder · · Score: 1

      Well then they've got 5 or 6 units sold for sure already.

    3. Re:Too small to use at NORAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand it that Jeff Han has already gotten a pretty sweet deal from the military for installing a couple of these babies.

  82. Yawn! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    Wow this is "new". I have seen students make such systems using Max/MSP with a projector under tables and sensors to know what you're touching.

    I have also seen this product show years ago at CEDIA expos.

    Yawn!

  83. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by lilomar · · Score: 1

    When me and my friends from college play D&D, we all bring laptops. We frequently use the calculators for keeping track of HP, and our DM uses jpg's as maps, but the most useful function of a computer at a D&D session is to have the books you use often (Player's handbook, any books with spells) running as a pdf. The search feature makes finding out exactly what that little-used spell does in the heat of battle a lot simpler.

    --
    The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  84. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by peragrin · · Score: 1

    go back and re-read what you wrote.

    The Coffee table uses infra-red sensors. What happens you place a a cup of hot coffee on the coffee table? what happens when you spill some? Will the coffee flowing over the table set off a touch sensor?

    This tech needs to be in a desk not a coffee table.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  85. MS takes a dip in the big box 'o names by simong · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many common words Microsoft have registered or bought as domains recently? They've got live.com, popcorn.whateveritis and now surface.com. It just encourages people.

    As for the idea itself it looks great. I hope Microsoft haven't cornered all the rights for it as it should be an open platform (what am I saying, it's Microsoft *slaps head*) and I for one can't wait to play Galaxian on it, even in an ironic way.

    1. Re:MS takes a dip in the big box 'o names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      popcorn.whateveritis A little off topic, but I think you're thinking about popfly.ms.
  86. ummm... not a good idea... by night_flyer · · Score: 0

    Booming sales of laptops have led to a surge in the number of computer users with back and muscle problems, experts have warned.

    Girls as young as 12 are being diagnosed with nerve damage caused by slouching over screens, a group of leading chiropractors said.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/hea lth/healthmain.html?in_article_id=458548&in_page_i d=1774

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  87. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by norminator · · Score: 2, Funny

    And if the coffee cup driver isn't digitally signed by Microsoft, you'll get a warning message every time you set it on the table.

    Actually, I'd be pissed if someone set their coffee cup on my $10,000 electronic multi-touch coffee table anyway. I think the warnings should say "Even if this driver is signed by Microsoft...USE A COASTER!!.

    Not much of a coffee table if you can't set your coffee cup on it.

  88. Open Source by ehaggis · · Score: 1

    How long before there is an open source project like this? Or is there already one? I must admit, I think it is pretty "nifty".

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Open Source by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      Much of the effort so far has been academic and open source. Check out Touchlib to get started.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  89. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

    "Fluff"? I would say that the physical device interaction is the coolest part of the whole deal.

    Oops sorry, I'm not following the Slashdot groupthink. *clears throat* Rah! Rah! Microsoft evil! Microsoft steal idea! Microsoft does no innovation! Rah!~

  90. Re:Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscree by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

    Seems the obvious thing to do is build it into a drafting table, and let the user adjust the slope of the surface as necessary.

  91. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother? I've seen the exact same thing described in the article on You Tube over six months ago. I'm guessing it's the same preexisting product mentioned in the article. It's just another Microsoft "innovation" (aka copy).

  92. Hardly Anything innovative by samotano · · Score: 0

    As usual, like everything that is MS there's hardly any innovation and originality in this. Except perhaps some new patents and the ability to mass market this product. This technology has been worked on for many many years, most notably by Mitsubishi and a lot of university labs.

  93. Ob Clippy... by Skater · · Score: 1

    It looks like you are trying to make out...

  94. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by glindsey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah MS added some fluff by making it interact with devices placed on top the the basic idea is not some new "Top Secret" project


    True, but the "fluff" is exactly the point. There are always two parts to a successful project: implementation and presentation. Geeks are going to flip out over the implementation, but if it is going to be presented to the general public, it has to be in a slick package, and it has to have the bells and whistles -- the "fluff" -- that make people go "oooooohhhh". Consider the iPod, which was absolutely nothing new (as witnessed by CmdrTaco's infamous offhand comment). But Apple took an existing technology and wrapped it in a shiny case and interface, and sales exploded.

    It is those little stupid things, like the soft glowing ring around a drink set on the table, or the little ripple effect when a finger hits it, or the way the pictures "explode" out of the camera when it is set down, that will make Joe Six-Pack sit up and pull out his wallet.

    And honestly, you think having the Surface interact with devices set on it is "fluff"? As I said above, the little graphical flourishes that happen are definitely fluff, but the concept of merely having to set a device down on the table for them to communicate is utterly simple and intuitive. I'd say that's a huge point in Surface's favor.
  95. No ones mentioned Back Ache yet. by supersnail · · Score: 1

    I know from experience table top bar room games they had a while back.
    Spend more than a couple of dollars and you need a day or two ro straighten up.

    Got backache -- here swallow this tablet PC.

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  96. MS is the Rodney Dangerfield of the IT world ... by CiRu5 · · Score: 1

    ... they just can't get any respect. I love to bash MS as much as the next person, but come on, they deserve some props for this effort. Sure they didn't invent the technology but it sure does look like they have put some very nice polish to it. It's so funny how MS gets bashed for doing exactly what Apple gets praised for, taking an existing technology and extending it.

    --
    "Some of the worst mistakes in my life have been haircuts." - Jim Morrison
  97. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    What, you think people don't have cups of hot coffee on their desks?

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  98. Hahaha. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1
  99. Origami by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah yes, I'd forgotten about Origami - how quickly that disappeared. And didn't they announce that shortly before Jobs announced the iPhone?

    Perhaps Apple fanboys should take this as being a sign that Apple is going to announce something really big at the WWDC in a couple of weeks time!

    1. Re:Origami by stonecypher · · Score: 1
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:Origami by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we're talking about marketing here. From a marketing perspective, it's disappeared. From the website they linked to: "Origami is a code name for a small project with big plans." Do you remember the hype when Microsoft launched this, almost as if it was a new hardware product they were about to release? They just used this little development project to create a spoiler campaign for the iPhone. I believe this is just the same thing - an R&D project hyped to spoil whatever is coming from Apple in a couple of weeks at the WWDC.

    3. Re:Origami by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Apple fanboys should take this as being a sign that Apple is going to announce something really big at the WWDC in a couple of weeks time! My guess is that the GPP is one the money: a touch screen version of the iMac. Specifically, think of an iMac that looks pretty much the same as the current model, the difference being that everything is wireless of plugged into the stand, and you can lift the screen off the stand and go and sit on the couch and use it as a touchscreen tablet to lie back and browse through web pages at leisure etc. In some ways this is little different than a tablet notebook and a docking station, but its the fine points: having the desktop detup really be a desktop; having a simple and elegant inger based multi-touch interface for when you carry the screen away; maing the docking/un-docking incredibly easy -- just pick it up and go; etc. The point being to promote it note as a notebook replacement, but as a desktop replacement that you can just carry into the next room to show something to your friend if you want etc. Basically just a more flexible lifestyle oriented desktop -- that is, exactly the sort of thing Apple strives for.
    4. Re:Origami by gig · · Score: 1

      The stand on the iMac is already removable. If you add a third-party touch screen to today's iMac you can lay it down on any table and go to work for about $1500, and it is twice the resolution of Microsoft Surface also.

      The story on the iPhone is that it was originally a tablet Mac, but making it ridiculously small made the fingers part even more useful because you don't have a keyboard or mouse to replace, you're essentially replacing a number pad.

      With how much people like the "touch your music" thing, and the fact that touch screens are HUGE among electronic DJ's, and Final Cut and Logic have thousands of knobs and controls and sliders, the platform would do really well if it went all touch screen.

      Also you can imagine a very small notebook with a keyboard and a wide touch screen and no track pad, a cross between iPhone and MacBook. The touch screen enables SMALLER and they have been doing smaller at Apple since 2000 like it is a religion.

  100. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by SABME · · Score: 1

    Point taken, but how many videogames, circa-1980, could automate all the tasks required to run an AD&D campaign (for example, Against the Giants) for five players?

  101. decent UI by suzerain · · Score: 1

    I pretty much hate Microsoft. However, I'm kind of impressed.

    As for the technology...I don't know. I remember seeing it in a movie in Minority report, for example, whenever the hell that shitty movie was out. Jeff Han's stuff was certainly publicized earlier than this, but that doesn't mean he had his ideas first; according to the history stuff on Microsoft's Web site, they've been working on the idea for a long time. So either of them (or in fact someone else we have never seen or heard from) could really be the originators of this idea.

    Anyway, I don't much care for who "invented" it, because it was going to happen eventually anyway.

    What I'm impressed with is that it's well designed. It's the first thing I've ever seen from Microsoft that has Apple's ease of use...that follows the "less is better" dictum of interface design. They resisted using toolbars, and menus, and everything is simple and would be pretty intuitive for even technophobes to use.

    So, for once, I have to say, "nice job, Microsoft".

    --
    gameDB
    1. Re:decent UI by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      The demos on their website wasn't half bad, especially for Microsoft. And they didn't even try to sabotage Opera users, if only because the website was pure flash (and not Silverlight, thank god.)
      It kind of annoyed me the way they make silent implications that they invented all this stuff (simply by not giving any outside credit, even the 'history' page is all wishy washy and Microsofty), especially seeing how at least half of the demos is the same stuff we've been seeing from everyone else, like the photo app, maps, etc. I guess that's to be expected from any large evil organization, though. No props given in the business world.
      I have mixed feelings about stuff like laying cameras on the board and having the pictures show up. It seems like a very intuitive, and at the same time horribly inefficient way to organize photos.
      They show people freely sharing music and pictures via the Zune though? PIRATZ!!1

      The overall impression I get is that someone forgot to lock the cage that is Microsoft Research. I'm sure they will correct this oversight with exuberant use of DRM, poor quality control, disregard for standards, frivolous patents and anything else it takes.
      They have withstood excellent, polished and/or innovative ideas before, and they will do so again, dammit!

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  102. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by greenguy · · Score: 1

    but can you imagine writing a driver for your favorite coffee cup?

    I can't program, but boy, could I come up with some ideas:

    - An in-desk coffee warmer that senses where you set the cup down (and quickly returns the rest of the desk to room temp so you don't burn your hand).
    - A weight sensor that alerts the coffeemaker to brew more coffee. It could also log how much coffee you drink to alert you to buy more.
    - A cup detector that alters the desk's color scheme to match the mug you chose today.
    - A spill detector that brings a roll of paper towels up from a cabinet below.
    - A sort of normative recommender system: "People who drink this much coffee should visit this site on renal health."
    - Recognizing that two or more cups means there's a meeting going on. Load drivers for video conferencing.
    - The desk should compare notes with the kitchen counter to remind you to wash your mug once in a while.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  103. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by vandoravp · · Score: 1

    Any sort of game that relies on a top-down view would benefit immeasurably from this. I, myself, am awaiting the day when I'll be able to play an RTS like Starcraft on a table like this - without having to build the table myself. The flashy graphics and automated stuff might even spawn a resurgence of D&D and similar games. As you said, playing online or even over a LAN still doesn't have quite the same social feel.

  104. See here for demos... by notaprguy · · Score: 1

    You can see some pretty cool demos at http://www.microsoft.com/surface/

  105. Doesn't Paramount own this? by nurbles · · Score: 1

    This 20 year old idea was used many, many times in the various Star Trek shows, starting with Next Generation. They used large flat, touchable displays embedded in desks and console and often would set a pad computer on a desk/console to transfer some data to/from it. Theirs may not have been actual, functional computers at the time, but the ideas seem almost exactly the same to me. Of course, the idea is probably even older and from something I didn't read or see, but I see nothing in Microsoft's offering that I didn't see in Trek's. Hopefully this means they cannot patent the concept...

  106. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by div_2n · · Score: 1

    I have memories of playing tabletop arcade games and those memories are quite mixed. I seem to remember getting a very stiff neck and back from hovering over the screen.

  107. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    While it's certainly interesting I have found that adding a computer to the mix (beyond a laptop for the DM with tools like eTools, DM's Familliar and access to the d20srt.org) frequently gets in the way of having a good time. We use a custom made board manufactured at a print shop which has dry erase material on both sides along with the standard 1" grid, we can map everything just fine with a marker and we can flip the board over for tactical stuff with miniatures (or just numbered pennies). The whole thing works brilliantly.

    I have a projector and I've tied using various tools for mapping with the computer, but nothing works as well (or as fluidly) as the old "whiteboard".

    A side comment about dice rollers, if you make a histogram with the average dice roller you will find that a lot of the time it just isn't as random as the good old fashioned die roll. I say, let D&D stay pen and paper...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  108. makes me think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well... good thing, i like it, but it is not new, and certainly not affordable...
    i mean...
    that should be a 30" lcd with at least 3 cameras... that is not exaclty portable neither cheap...
    even the computer should have way more power than te "medium" one we have today...

    and it would just kill my back working on that thing. or tell me why you should put your monitor at a proper high...
    it would be better to have a big monitor in front of you and a small table-touch-thing where you usually put your keyboard...

    and i wonder how it works when you put 2 equal cameras on your desk... those in the video where _different_ devices.
    why can't it change one for an other? or why can't someone else access your photos using similar device, just using a directional antenna ('cause i assume that things work with wifi, bluetooth is so slow...)? will that mean that we'll have cameras with passwords and things like that?(o shit!)
    hell, why not just stick with a retractable usb cable??
    o.. and if we stick with cables for devices, we won't even need camers! touchscreens will be fine! cheaper!

    1. Re:makes me think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they copied from the multiple pointer X?
      they have patented it?

      http://wearables.unisa.edu.au/mpx/?q=screenshots

  109. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I strongy doubt it's using passive infra-red.

  110. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Once again Microsoft proves to the world that it can do anything right. There isn't a single cup holder anywhere on the stupid thing. And where are the ashtrays?

    Steve Jobs could squeeze out something juicier than this in a two minute trip to the bathroom.

  111. ....and get it to market by Quevar · · Score: 1

    MS has a way of announcing products way in advance of when they will actually ship. From what they have stated, it is not even clear that they expect this to be available before Christmas. They stated on their website that it is due in Winter '07, which officially starts on December 21st.

    I totally agree with what you said, but I would change it to the one who can polish and ship it .

    1. Re:....and get it to market by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Either way, I want one. I can see some uses for it.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  112. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a multitouch screen - it can process multiple simultaneous touches and gestures. Obviously you haven't researched the technology much.

  113. MAME by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    Special version of MAME with on-screen controls will hopefully soon follow. I don't know if I'd pay $5000 for state-of-the-art applications and functionality... but if I can play Galaga with touch-screen controls I might change my tune.

  114. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by ciroknight · · Score: 0

    They didn't even invent the interactions:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thA_Oox1Cfc

    Video of a table-based music interaction screen that's existed since around 2005. More-or-less, Microsoft combined this with Han's FTIR system and is now acting like they invented something, likely in response to Apple's iPhone and its multi-touch interface.

    The one thing that's not detailed is the fact that Apple's multi-touch sensor can be spread over virtually any surface, whereas the one Microsoft's attempting to market has to be built into a table or something with substantial depth due to the need for a projector, camera, and IR optics. The capacitive sensor is a tad bit less accurate, but I'll take that for being able to be manufactured on thin-films and thusly be put on any device (multi-touch laptop mouse-pads ahoy).

    So no, I'll pass on this one, I'll wait for my multi-touch portable, or at least something I can use upright.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  115. It looks pretty cool but... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    This would be a complete nightmare for back problems. Bad posture-related issues would far more frequrently occur with this device as you're much more hunched over the display.

  116. Right, James Cameron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, well Aliens was shot in what 1986 (the table where they planned the defense of the colony using the digital architectual plans), the way I see it for trying to steal his glory, you owe James Cameron 1 blow job. Enjoy.

  117. Vapourware... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    to augment the lagging sales of Vista malware?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  118. BTOD by spocksbrain · · Score: 1

    Blue Table of Death.

  119. Was Han's demo running atop OS X? by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

    Was it just me, or did I see a highly familiar dock at the top of his screen at about 6'40" into the demo?
    --
    Franklin Brauner

  120. Wirelss interaction with liquids by Swizec · · Score: 0

    The real question here is what happens if you spill the coffee, which is usually exactly what happens on fancy coffee tables. Can you then wirelessly make the table interact with that coffee, or does it simply hurt the table?

    Now if it recognised there's been a spill and call a robot slave to clean it up ... that would be wonderful.

  121. open source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are there any open source projects moving this way?

  122. Will there be a book? by A10Mechanic · · Score: 1

    Will there be a coffee-table book about the coffee-table computer, and will the book "become" a computer? (props to Larry David)

  123. Coding by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    It would make sense that he run something like Processing (processing.org) or Flash to develop the demo. Why would somebody develop an underlying OS for interaction design purposes. The choice between Java and ActionScript would make me cringe at presentation time however!

  124. Re:Similar tech - the reactable by teslar · · Score: 1

    Some more similar tech, albeit applied in a very different domain: The Reactable, basically a glorified synthesizer developed at the UPF in Barcelona, but very cool indeed. It also has a homepage and is used for instance by Björk.

  125. Makes Flat Screens Just Like A CRT by gig · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem strange to put a computer display into a table like this, rather than into just a table-top? Since displays are flat?

    I'm thinking that the Apple version of this would have just been a table top and you would attach whatever legs you want, but there would be room for your legs under there.

    The Microsoft version looks like it has some 1940's radar in there also. Why does it have to be such a big box?

    There is a rumor that the next generation of Macs will have multi-touch screens like the iPhone. In that case a $1200 iMac can lay flat on your kitchen table and you have the same thing.

  126. I think I'll pass... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1

    I have enough porn on my coffee table, thank you very much.

  127. Bitching and moaning by DaveCBio · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I love to complain as much as the next guy, but sometimes Slashdotters come off as the worst kind of internet poser that isn't impressed by anything. Sure there have been examples of this inthe past. The difference is a company like Microsoft takes the idea and makes a commercial product with it. Taking an idea out of the academic world and actually making something useful is the whole idea research like this. If Apple did this there would be a line a couple kms long on this site to fellate Jobs.

    1. Re:Bitching and moaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are correct. This point has been made over and over, and is ignored by many who feel the constant need to bash Microsoft. Most (outside of this kind of environment) could care less where the technology comes from - they simply are interested in technology they can use. This brief demonstration shows real-world, useful applications - and frankly inspires a plethora of additional ideas.

      And so many comments as to this being vaporware... For a pototype, it looks like the fundamental technology is already working pretty well. Any developer could easily recognize that with this and a decent API - they could write anything they imagined to exploit the potential of a device like this.

      Can it be made smaller? Of course! Or larger, or rounder or more 3D.... Use your imaginations for a change rather than sitting around complaining what others are accomplishing.

      Now back to my coding - slightly more inspired now as well :)

    2. Re:Bitching and moaning by gig · · Score: 1

      > Sure there have been examples of this inthe past. The difference is a company like Microsoft takes the idea and makes a commercial
      > product with it.

      YOU STUPID FUCKING ASS.

      1) this is not a commercial product
      2) Microsoft leads the world demo:product ratio (very few products, millions of demos)
      3) they have two (2) profitable products (Office, Windows/DOS) in their ENTIRE FUCKING HISTORY
      4) neither Office or Windows/DOS are even remotely original, in fact they were proud to bring you a WordPerfect clone, a Lotus clone, a Mac clone

      > Taking an idea out of the academic world and actually making something useful is the whole idea research like this. If Apple did this there
      > would be a line a couple kms long on this site to fellate Jobs.

      ONCE AGAIN, YOU STUPID FUCKING ASS.

      The iPhone ships in a couple of weeks, and yes, there is a line a couple of kms long to fellate Jobs.

    3. Re:Bitching and moaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Yeah, we love bashing Microsoft.

      We actually want to know how stuff works, share what we know in exchange for what someone else knows. Pure curiosity - often applied to what we do for other people.

      However, to Microsoft, we are hackers and pirates. Both said with a strong negative connotation.

      I do not think any of us have anything against embrace and extend....its the embrace, extend, and patent part that really annoys us - the "patent" part meaning they won't play with others - its gotta be the Microsoft Way, or the highway. Then they have the temerity to launch legal attacks with the money used to purchase their products to bully anyone else in the playground out of their ball, using the legal powers vested in our government to make sure nobody else can play unless Microsoft licenses it.

      Microsoft teams up with highly paid and supported executives of other businesses to force their licensed expireware on the rest of us. I can't do business with SCE, Fidelity Investments, Merrill Lynch, or even see my grades at the local College without being forced into a Microsoft product, so I end up withdrawing all my retirement funds from the brokers who will not use standard communication protocols, and do business orally over the phone or in person with the other businesses.

      Business may place "teamwork" and being able to work with others high on the list for their HUMAN employees, but these attributes seem to rank dead last when dealing with their web presence. If their customer fails to come in with a Microsoft product, its quite acceptable to slam the door in his face. Customers are a dime a dozen anyway, who really cares if their business server is dishing out blank pages?

      These businesses are large and customers are a dime a dozen. Business will pay for people to tell us we have to snap to attention and obey their demand we use a certain OS to talk to them. Business will pay even more for the people who hire people who think that way. When executives get paid what they do, why the hell do they need customers?

      What business does Microsoft Technology Partners have dealing with lowly Non-Microsoft people such as Mac and Linux users anyway?

      To me, building with proprietary Microsoft products becomes a major litigation risk if I try to get it to play with others. Besides, when my customers have one flavor of client, Microsoft will only support another flavor of development tools so they can use my usage of them to force my customers into another round of licenses). To me a Microsoft Business is like a Tent City, here today, obsolete tomorrow. Its not at all like building a Cathedral designed to last for centuries.

      I see this table, its something to be thrown away in a couple of years. Just like all those other wonderful Microsoft products who died an early death by the combined approach of lack of support and legal methods of keeping anyone else from picking up the reins. I would not have it. Building my infrastructure out of this stuff is like building house foundations from untreated lumber. Great if it only has to last for a couple of years or so, but I do not like having to build my infrastructures over and over and over again. I am like that old bartender that still uses his old National cash register - the big mechanical brass one. Fifty years later, it still does what it was designed to do. Microsoft is like plumbing that won't stay fixed. Big pain in the arse.

      Many of us still use public standards, have communicated effectively for years using it, and will do so for the forseeable future. We can still make the iron, bricks, glass, and mortar used to build even the oldest cathedrals. But we may not legally do things if their implementation is prohibited by IP law.

      Can anyone really tell me where plain old HTML, coupled with .MP3, .AVI(DivX,XviD), .BMP(Image Maps), .GIF, and .JPG fall short for damn near ANY

    4. Re:Bitching and moaning by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Not sure how this got past moderation, but your language alone allows me to ignore your points. If you can't be civil, don't bother.

  128. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  129. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by dintech · · Score: 1

    Lucky you. Posting biblical stuff usually attracts flamebait, troll and redundant mods.

  130. This is new? by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

    How is this table different from the one demoed over a year ago featuring warcraft 3? That one was also multi-point of contact, and accepted vocal commands. link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YIGh06lep0

  131. Microsoft Technology? by freedomseven · · Score: 0

    Not to pick nits but I saw this very same demo a year ago expect it was credited to Apple. Check out the link. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6379146923 853181774

  132. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm...I wonder what happens when you put your drink on the MS table?
    You can upload your coffee to your Java enabled phone apparently.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  133. What a neat tool for pen-and-paper RPG players... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine being the GM/DM and putting hex city maps or scrolling terrain/encounter maps on such a table display? Have the players put their characters' figures on the table, and you're good to go.

    I'd LOVE to have something like this as a GM. :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  134. Its a coffee table barcode reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still a coffee table, the hardware is crude, Han's sensor is thin and scalable and can fit on the front of existing screens. So firstly in terms of hardware it has no mass market there because they require that back projector, Hans design doesn't.

    Then there's the interface, please go look at Hans work and you'll see how crude the MS looks by comparison. They have the same zoom and rotate, but otherwise extremely limited gestures. I guess they'll copy his group actions too? What about his tilt action?

    The only plus seems to be the WiFi camera detect, you place the camera on the screen and it magically shows the photos, well not really. The camera has to be tagged with a barcode like visual mark to be recognized by the table and the screen is pretaught the tags, and of course switched on (but then why wouldn't you press the send button?)

    So what they've made there looks very nice in demo, but the parts Microsoft has contributed are poor and the other parts are assembled from other peoples work.

    The reason I think it's a FUD operation is because it's being pre-announced. Also their claims are that it's been developed in secret for 5 years.... Microsoft doesn't keep secrets very well, and the work is poor by comparison to other people's work, a quick knock up rather than a long development project.

    It looks like they saw the Apple announcement, or Han's work, thought, shit, lets knock something together to get in on the game, and that's what it looks like.

  135. How is this innovative? by SubZ · · Score: 1

    Why are we talking about this? Similar products have been around for some time. I've seen the TouchTable (http://www.touchtable.com/site/index.php) and that is pretty good.

  136. Re: Wait ... by MahariBalzitch · · Score: 0
    "Back in 1980, when I was a hardcore high school AD&D player, my friends and I...".

    You had friends?

  137. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

    You know, I'd almost pay the price they're asking for a chance to play DEFCON on this... Then again, I'm hoping I'll get to make such a screen during the next few years, so maybe I'll get it.

    --
    In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  138. Lets Congratulate Microsoft by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Lets give credit where credit is due and acknowledge good behavior when it emerges. Today Microsoft has genuinely innovated. They haven't invented anything new from whole cloth but they have taken a bunch of existing ideas and crafted a new and exciting product, that people will want to buy. Maybe this is something Microsoft might possibly get used to doing. You know, making good high quality useful stuff that people actually WANT to buy.

    Here's to hoping!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  139. Better applications by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are applications for this sort of thing, but finger-painting isn't it.

    Given that the basic property of this device is that output resolution is good and screen size is large, and input resolution is poor but you can use multiple touches, an obvious application is video editing. An interface for quickly putting together a news show would find a high-end market. There are tools for this now, like Avid NewsCutter, but they rely heavily on keyboard commands and have too many modes.

    The big advantage of multi-touch is that it's a way out of the mode limitations of a single-pointer interface. Right now, your options are usually verb-object (get into mode, select thing), or object-verb (select thing, go to menu to indicate what to do with it.) This breaks down when you need to talk about more than one thing at a time. With multi-touch, there are more options.

    Somebody will probably do a DJ console with this interface.

    1. Re:Better applications by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "There are applications for this sort of thing, but finger-painting isn't it."
      You lack imagination.

      My daughter would LOVE that. I would love it too, because then I can save all here 'finger paint' drawing digitally. So I can have them in perfect form, forever.

      Yes I realize there is a tactile quality of using actual paint, and I wouldn't take that away from my kids, this is just another option. FYI I actually have an eazle in my living room that my kids can use whenever they want.

      Is it the only application? no but it would be a good one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Better applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  140. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, before LCD screens were big and cheap, a company making LCD projectors was running a contest where they'd give a projector to people with good "alternative" ways to use the technology.

    I suggested what you are suggesting. Namely, a table with a translucent surface onto which the game map (and possibly various stats, rolls, etc.) was projected.

    I didn't win. They even e-mailed me back to tell me it was a silly waste of technology.

    It's nice to see MS licensing Apple's multitouch tech for their product, though. At least, I assume it's properly licensed.

  141. You're kidding, right? by KH2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [MS uses] a screen larger than a postage stamp (as opposed to the iPhone, for example).

    Apple is using multitouch as a gimmick to create buzz. It doesn't actually do anything useful. Nothing like some facile Apple-bashing. Watch the Apple demos to see how useful multitouch is for a cell phone. And Apple's "postage stamp"-size screen will be something I can own myself & use every day, as opposed to the MS display, which costs $5k-$10k.
    1. Re:You're kidding, right? by in5ane · · Score: 1

      What? $5-$10k isn't that much really for a Tron table... if you're a proper nerd that is :)

  142. nostalgia by not_anne · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of playing table top Pac Man in a restaurant in the 80's and also putting Cue Cat barcodes on everything in Y2K! Nice nostalgia combo there.

    --
    My comments here are my own; I do not speak for my employer.
  143. Mainly it's multitouch by jmarkantes · · Score: 1

    I think the apps are nice, but the major enabling technology is multitouch. Which has been around, but just now is making some (marketing) headway.

    Coupled with a large screen it is awesome, but I could see this in several applications. Imagine just the simple touchpad on a laptop being multitouch. You could do a lot of the similar photo manipulations with just that, separate from the screen. Or on pda's or large screen phones (like the iphone).

    Anyways, could be kinda cool in the future.
    J

    1. Re:Mainly it's multitouch by samantha · · Score: 1

      Synaptics based trackpads such as in Apple laptops already track the difference between one and multiple fingers touching the pad. What is going to be really interesting to me is the multiple new GUI paradigms this makes possible. I have been hoping for touch screen and especially multi-touch to become the norm for a long time now.

      Does anyone know if multi-touch in unencumbered enough to hack on? Are there good multi-touch screens or overlays available? I would love to play with the technology. I think it is going to be really big.

      - samantha

    2. Re:Mainly it's multitouch by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      There's several projects documented where people have hacked their own screens. Check out http://www.whitenoiseaudio.com/touchlib/ and http://www.multitouch.nl/

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  144. Brilliant? No. PR gimmick? Why yes, it is! by blueZ3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unless the memory stick or other flash media has some sort of wireless built in, there's no way that the "Blue screen of coffee tables" is going to "download" the contents into the PC running the display on the table. It might be able to get your contacts off your phone via bluetooth (but note that this won't be the demo's automagic version either, as most phones require user interaction to do transfers).

    The fact that the whole media card "spilling" images onto the surface was reported as such a "Wow! Brilliant! The BEST thing EVAR!" just goes to show the poor state of technology journalism today.

    And the demo of this particular feature isn't very Apple-like. An Apple interface wouldn't "spill" a random pile of crap onto the desktop. As for providing links to cell phone plans when you put your phone down on the table, that's such a bad idea it's hard to know where to start the critique. New from Microsoft! Spam on your coffee table! Yes, Bill, whenever I put my phone down I want to be bombarded with ads. Thanks so much! Most folks who have a plan (in the US) are locked in because that's how they got the cheap phone. Which shows the deep thought put into this product. And on, and on, and on.

    As for the bar codes on everyday products, that sounds suspiciously like the CueCat business plan.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Brilliant? No. PR gimmick? Why yes, it is! by Macthorpe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Just to inform you, all you did there was sound extremely bitter, and quite frankly pathetic.

      Are you going to come up with a real criticism of the tech, other than a lame 'durhur BSOD' joke and some awful conjecture about spilling photos and spam?

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:Brilliant? No. PR gimmick? Why yes, it is! by wfWebber · · Score: 1

      Think and listen. You looked, but you forgot the other two. Putting a phone on a table and getting info, is brilliant, when the table is located at your local Phones'r Us. Even more brilliant, if you put another one next to it, it tells you the differences.

      Of course that's not a table-app you'll be running at your Starbucks, but that's where the pie-ordering comes in.

      Personally, I was amazed while looking at the small demos. It's been a long time since I've seen a user-interface that's this accessible.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
    3. Re:Brilliant? No. PR gimmick? Why yes, it is! by rlbond86 · · Score: 0

      Sounds like somebody's mad he didn't think of it first.

  145. Another stolen technology by TheDarkener · · Score: 0

    Check out the video on YT. This looks like another one of Microsoft's "embrace and call it your own" deals:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZMNjoudyFM

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  146. Reactable by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    What? No mention of the reactable? Not sure which research predates which, but the reactable sure is way cool as is :)

  147. That's no table! by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bad news - that's no table, that's the new Zune Phone rumored for so long to compete against the iPhone!

    Llama or sherpa not included.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  148. Anyone notice who is using the Coffee Table by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Sure looks a lot like a young Bill Gates (with different hair color) and Melinda Gates, doesn't it?

    Intentional? Or sheer coincidence, just like it's coincidence that MSFT is suing Linux vendors?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  149. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely different tech from Apple's. And both the bully and the fruit are followers on the multitouch scene.

  150. Steve Ballmer added... by daskrabs · · Score: 1

    "It's nice and light in case you'd like to throw it across the room."

  151. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Coffee table uses infra-red sensors. What happens you place a a cup of hot coffee on the coffee table? what happens when you spill some? Will the coffee flowing over the table set off a touch sensor?

    MS' interactive displays use near IR, not thermal IR. Probably because:

    1 - NIR gear is incredibly cheap, whereas thermal IR gear is still very pricey.
    2 - There are lots of materials that are transparent to NIR but translucent to visible light. Their displays have a NIR camera and an NIR LED array in addition to the video projector behind the projection surface, which the NIR light passes through in both directions. The user sees the visible light on the projection surface, and the system sees the user. AFAIK material that would work like that for thermal IR is more exotic.

    Anyway, coffee would probably look transparent enough to the camera to not register a hit. But even if it did, the video shows little CGI bubbles moving away from the cup set on the table, so I'm sure they've thought of this kind of thing.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  152. Re:Porn has to be the killer application for this by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, according to the article, they eventually want to get this technology embedded into walls and ceilings. Just imagine the possibilities...beyond porn directly above your bed of course...

    For example, imagine if your 'computer wall' could display an electronic companion that followed you around the house (naked) and did various tasks that you asked of it. (sort of like a nude clipy) The possibilities are endless.

  153. The fluff was a failed project Interactive Bowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fluff comes from their interactive bowl project:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online /4534674.stm

    "We also hope to be able to drag the images around the bowl, making use of the physical properties of the bowl to be able to display things in certain places, and possibly let them sit at the bottom of the bowl for storage."

    But it needs the devices to have visual tags appended to their bases.

    Looking at where they were in Dec 2005, it looks like the multi-touch has been added quickly as an after thought to that project.

  154. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

    Wow, a picture of a finger pointing at a screen! What an amazing demonstration of the concept! There's even a text blurb saying it is revolutionary!
    Are there perhaps any videos of this actually in action that you could link to instead?

    --
    In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  155. Dup. lol. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    Not a duplicate article - a duplicate technology that does the same thing as what a group at NYU are doing.

    A description, and a nice Quicktime video.

    I had a nice video of a demo at a tradeshow, too - but I can't find it right now.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  156. Coffee Table Vista Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have placed a cup of coffee on the surface, cancel or allow?

  157. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by geekoid · · Score: 1

    how dare you question THE STEVE!
    hehe
    iPhone, disappear me!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  158. Trivialize It by TimoTaye · · Score: 1

    'Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display' makes this sound trivial. If you watch the videos (okay, I only watched one) this is actually fairly rad and involved a great deal of research to achieve.

  159. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but just try uploading that bucket of KFC Original recipe to a FAT partition. That's sure to clog the tubes.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  160. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lucky you. Posting biblical stuff usually attracts flamebait, troll and redundant mods.

    Amen to that.

  161. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Dude, Solomon crushes all of the existentialists so handily in Ecclesiastes.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  162. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

    Dude, you do realize you forgot the one element that is most critical to computing applications?

    Yeah, that's right.

    Silicon.

    Good job. Your geek license is hereby revoked. :)

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  163. Using both hands is a patentable idea? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    If using both hands to interact with something is a patentable idea, then I'm going to patent using both feet for walking.

    Our patent system is FUBAR.

    -ted

    1. Re:Using both hands is a patentable idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing you should recognize is that Apple hasn't patented the idea of "using both hands to interact with something." (Not to mention that true Multi-touch is actually the ability to use an unlimited number of hands, not just two hands).

      Apple happens to own a number of Multi-Touch patents because it bought FingerWorks a few years back. FingerWorks was a pioneer in Multi-Touch hardware and happened to have a lot of patents in the field.

      It's a bit naive to assume that a multi-touch patent is just an idea of using many hands. The patents are likely more complicated than that. They probably have to do with how a screen is able to interpret the input from multiple sources.

  164. History of Multi-touch Computing by notaprguy · · Score: 1
  165. A little more background by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the demonstrations of TouchLight and PlayAnywhere on Andy Wilson's blog: http://research.microsoft.com/~awilson/default.htm l - he's been working on this for quite some time. As I understand it, the surface itself is not a touch screen like in a PDA - the images from the camera are processed to perceive depth and detect a touch when all captured images reach a certain point of intersection. Instead of only detecting a physical touch, the screen can also detect as your hand (or whatever) moves closer or further away from the screen.

  166. Not really fluff at all by StreetStealth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Each little touch you mentioned, while contributing its own degrees of wow-factor to the package, also contributes functionality.

    The glowing ring -- confirmation of an established connection. Ripple effect -- an interstitial "sandbox" to ease users into this mode of interaction. Exploding pictures -- making it clear that the photos aren't being simply triggered by the phone's contact with the surface, obviously establishing their source as the phone itself.

    Sure, you could pop up a centered Windows dialog for the first, have a guided tutorial for the second, and just draw in the photos starting in the upper left for the last. But the animated flourishes actually carry information, improving the interface's functionality.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    1. Re:Not really fluff at all by Tickletaint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you. You're the ONLY person I've seen on Slashdot who gets it. Even if the moderators don't notice, this is a point that needs hammering home to the hordes of geeks who thumb their noses at "eye candy" and yet are responsible, somehow, for designing the shit interfaces to which we're subjected, Every. Fucking. Day.

      --
      Make Slashdot readable! See journal.
    2. Re:Not really fluff at all by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's probably because I crossed in the other direction (compared to most) over the design/development divide. I went to design school to learn how to make things usable by humans, but then tried to learn programming on my own and now back up my interfaces with terrible spaghetti code. ;)

      Either way, welcome to my friends list.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  167. Seems like a kludge,,, by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

    On the "surface", this looks pretty neat, but there's quite a bit of hardware to this thing. My feeling is that they haven't figured out how to do this in a smaller form factor.

    It could be simply a factor of not wanting anyone to know (outside of MS) and thus, MS didn't shop around for someone to create ASICs, etc. to get this down to a reasonable size.

    On the other hand, maybe what the world really, really needs to a $10K coffee table that your kid can lay your BlackBerry on and transfer your life to Nigeria, Estonia, etc.

    Yeah...that's gotta be the case.

    [tongue firmly in cheek]

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  168. and what in tarnations was Apple's iphone announce by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Huh?

    Its the same game. Announce it before your competitor does to keep people interested and not spending money on their product. seems to me Apple is very good at this technique as well

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  169. What'll Gates say this time? by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

    a coffee table in every living room in every home!

    --
    ---k--
    </stupid>
  170. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by SABME · · Score: 1

    >I didn't win. They even e-mailed me back to tell me it was a silly waste of technology.

    This is a real shame; I think it would be a great product (obviously). Playing devil's advocate for a moment, however, there probably isn't a large enough market to justify the expense of producing such a device. Which is why a general-purpose table sounds like such a good idea to me :-).

  171. Kudos, thumbs up, congratulations! Microsoft wins by n1_111 · · Score: 0

    Again and again Microsoft is leading the world with innovation. Server 2008, IIS 7, MOSS, Vista, Office 2007, Live.com, Popfly, Surface computing, Express Editions, etc., etc., are all great examples of the intense research by the best (expensive) brains in the world and subsequent implementation of that research by means of great design and engineering. There is a good reason why Microsoft is on top of the world and will only continue to grow and strengthen its' position. Capitalism rules!

  172. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by suggsjc · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, well what about Silicone?

    --
    When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  173. Chiropractors love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine what your back would feel like after leaning over this thing all day. Or how your arm would feel after holding it out straight if it were mounted vertically.

    The only market I see for this thing in its present configuration is really rich geeks who have to be the first guy on the block to get some new gadget.

  174. Re:Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscree by syukton · · Score: 1

    Touch-sensing isn't capacitive as it is with PDAs and Tablet PCs. It uses an Infrared sensing system and a set of cameras to detect objects on or within a few inches of the surface. Funny you should mention it, there IS a sheet of Lexan on top of it, and it works just fine. I should know, I'm sitting right beside one.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  175. What do I say in my Submarine now?? by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Microsoft I can't use the command "SURFACE! SURFACE!!" anymore.

  176. Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still like the computer navigation in Minority Report better. But indeed the MS one is pretty cool.

  177. Microsoft's PR works.... for Apple? by BeerCat · · Score: 1

    However you dress this up, it is still a Big Deal. It may not be the absolute first, but it is close enough for most folk.

    And yet... Microsoft announce a major new product, and their stock price (as I write this) has gone up 2 cents.

    Meanwhile, Apple hasn't anything (at least not until WWDC in a couple of weeks), and its stock price has gone up $3.06 !

    1. Launch product
    2. ????
    3. Watch competitor profit!

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  178. Yes, but... by VinB · · Score: 0

    does it run on Linux?

  179. Re:Amazing work. I want one, like now. by gig · · Score: 1

    > This is so "Star Trek" to the geek in me. Finally, a way to use the computing processing power available in a method about anyone can
    > use. Now to get it into a package that is thinner and doesn't require the supporting table.

    Possibly something that could be held in the hand and carried in the pocket, maybe a touch screen phone of some kind, maybe with an Apple logo on it, could be as soon as two weeks from now, but I don't know, it is so hard to peer into the mysterious future of technology.

  180. Oh Noez! by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    What do you do once you, or a clumsy house guest, inevitably spills steaming hot coffee (with a sticky creamer or loads of sugar) all over your nice shiny new "coffee" table?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:Oh Noez! by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      You... Wash it? I realize the concept may be foreign to you, but it involves soap and water. I'm sure you can look it up on Wikipedia.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    2. Re:Oh Noez! by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      Mmm, yes, because electronics are famous for having wonderful results when lathered in soapy water...

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    3. Re:Oh Noez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no active electronics on the surface itself, that's just a projection screen. That should be both highly washable and somewhat expendable. The magic happens underneath, with cameras and a projector.

  181. Lame? It's a spy. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Squirts on your zune, steals info from your cell phone, generally sucks.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  182. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

    Ooooh, I like that one too.

    Imagine if we could make silicon breast implants. A set of jugs that could hold the Library of Congress!

    Of course, the lovely ladies blessed with such extensions would need to wear water-cooled brassieres.

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  183. Oh yeah, don't set your laptop there...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sarcasm mode ON)

    A boon to corporate espionage! Set down any Bluetooth device on this table and it automatically downloads whatever is IN that device!

    How thoughtful! How friendly! How fracking SECURE for the unwary!

    Just what I want, to have to worry about which piece of furniture I can and cannot put my Bluetooth devices on, for fear of them having their data hijacked by one of these things. HIPAA compliancy issues, anyone?

    I can't wait until the first insurance agent gets his or her bluetooth phone hijacked by one of these things - with their client list included. That's what? A $10,000 per steal fine?

    Oh, this is going to be fun to watch!

    Not to mention that if Starwood Hotels is getting them, then they are doomed from the get-go...!

    (sarcasm mode OFF)

    1. Re:Oh yeah, don't set your laptop there...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if your bluetooth device will unload sensitive information to anything in range that asks, you're lucky if devices are polite enough to wait for you to put your laptop down on them first. I should imagine maintaining a list of trusted devices would work nicely, with a ask-on-first-request policy.

  184. Mod parent up by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    If you look at the link, multi-touch tabletop interfaces have been in developement for a long time. There have been lots of responses regarding Jeff Han, yet MS has publically demonstrated multi-touch before Jeff Han.

  185. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Imagine, your character sheet and virtual dice right in front of you; automated tracking for dice rolls, combat and spell recovery; fancy graphics for your map, characters, and monsters; maybe even a soundtrack and audio effects.

    ...No longer being able to cheat if the DM isn't paying attention or if a character sheet is 'barely legible'...

  186. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by jedie · · Score: 1

    Actually, in Windows XP you can turn off the unsigned-driver warning messages through the Adminitrative Tools in the local secuirty policies.

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
  187. Re:Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscree by kongjie · · Score: 1

    Good points and it all relates to the relevance of Surface and similar devices as commercial products.

    I'm sure these will be eye-catching in a casino and other locations; the photo downloading and manipulation would be _great_ at a Kodak kiosk in your local store.

    But what about the home/consumer market? It's more than a matter of just being too expensive right now. Even when the price comes down, there are fundamental issues. One of the first may be the fact that screens get dirty when you touch them. There are ways to reduce the impact of fingerprints, but those ways impact screen clarity. The finger-painting was cute and all but fingers are fairly imprecise compared to a digital tablet and pen.

    At first glance, it seems more "natural" to interact with screen objects using your hands and fingers. But that doesn't mean it is more efficient. One example--multi-touch input isn't much help when you only have one finger on one hand. Or if you can't keep your fingers steady enough to use it properly. Like the keyboard, it may very well be technology most efficiently used by people with two hands and 10 fingers.

  188. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by swillden · · Score: 1

    the most useful function of a computer at a D&D session is to have the books you use often (Player's handbook, any books with spells) running as a pdf.

    Where do you get these? Does WotC sell them? I looked around for torrents, but everything I can find seems to be just PDFs full of page images -- not searchable.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  189. I can't wait... by tsnorquist · · Score: 1

    To Play "Duke Nukem Forever" on that display...

  190. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To MIT) by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Would indeed be a nice add-on to this rubbing-based device.

  191. Now, if somebody could just put this technology... by woohootoo · · Score: 1

    ...in a portable, hand-held device! Oh, wait a minute...........

  192. enough to switch back to windows by Zarf · · Score: 1

    I am a Linux zealot. I hate Microsoft. I push Open Source everywhere. I don't have any windows or macintosh computers. I have five linux servers in my house. I have two linux workstations on my desk. I just launched an initiative for Linux on the desktop at work. I have wanted multi-touch since I saw this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ftJhDBZqss, http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcKqyn-gUbY

    I'm afraid that is cool enough that I might switch back from Linux to Windows. Where do I get in line for one of these again?

    --
    [signature]
  193. Re:Credit where due department (Yeah To Jeff Han) by gig · · Score: 1

    > Consider the iPod, which was absolutely nothing new

    As far as parts go, pieces go, no not really anything new ... what was new was that it worked.

    I would love to see something from Microsoft that works. It doesn't have to be new.

  194. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by lilomar · · Score: 1

    See, I know this guy, who knows this guy, who kinda-sorta "borrowed" them.
    Really, I think he found them online, some of them are images, but most of the main one's are good quality scans with the text rendered.
    I couldn't tell you where he got them though.

    --
    The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  195. Re:Amazing work. I want one, like now. by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 1

    on a side note, why did it take it 930AM EST to get this up on /.

    If you "worked" as a Slashdot editor, would you get up before 9 AM?

  196. What's wrong with this picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you noticed that Microsoft keeps emphasizing things like "social" and "collaborative" with respect to a lot of their products, including this one. They're implying that this is good--you're not isolated when using the device. And yet, they are pushing for more and more and MORE interaction solely with A F~*%ING COMPUTER, not a living, breathing person!!! You can bet that when I go to a restaurant that has one of these things, I'll either: 1) leave and go somewhere else, or 2) ask for a tablecloth!

  197. But where will I put my coffee cup? by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

    Naturally they chose a tabletop to implement their crap version of this technology since they need a place to hide the three or four ultra-high end PC's and cooling system required to run it (on top of the already bloated Windows Vista OS). My desk is cluttered enough, the last thing I need is more shyte going on underneath my papers. And where are my legs going to go when I'm sitting at this "desk?" Are we all expected to stand like Borg automotons in M$FT's glorious vision of our future?
    --
    Franklin Brauner

  198. Why would anyone need a glorified calculator... by Yeff · · Score: 1

    ...in their homes. What are they going to use it for? What a lot of people seem to be missing is the fact that this is just a coffee table Right this moment. Once people get their hands on it who knows how it'll eventually be used? It doesn't matter who gets it out the door first it's not going to be a static technology. Someone's going to be sitting at their MSTable and think, "Gee, wouldn't it be cool if it could do 'this?'" Eventually "this" will be something that's just in the background, not really noticed beyond how it's being used at the moment. I email on my computer, and then I surf the web, and then I watch... videos, and then I order music, and then I buy a book... It does all of those things but in the end it's still just a computer! I mean a calculator. Don't think about what this thing does now, imagine what it'll be doing later. And then remember the guy who evented a better calculator.

    --
    "Freedom Through Vigilance"
  199. A must buy by jkro · · Score: 1

    I am so exited. For now I have tilted my computer monitor 45 degrees to approximate the experience.

  200. Will it run .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... xroach?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  201. Conjecture: Does it actually work? by vikstar · · Score: 1

    I call bs on it actually working. Call me a cynic but I have a feeling that the photo, taken at about 2m:30s into the video, is not the exact same photo as the one on the coffee-table computer that was supposedly downloaded from the camera. I think the photo was prepared earlier, just something about the fidelity and care he gives into taking such an "improvised" photo, and the stillness and pose of the subject, leads me to conjecture that they prepared the photo earlier and it wasn't actually downloaded, only loaded from the computer's memory when the camera is placed onto the surface. I have no proof, it's just a gut feeling.

    --
    The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
  202. Bjork ReactTable at Coachella by bastianmz · · Score: 1

    The ReacTable has been used recently by Bjork at the Coachella festival.

    There are lots of good videos linked from the BoingBoing article including one of Robert Moog interacting with a ReactTable.

    The software is available so if you want one have a crack at building your own.

    As best as I can tell the only innovation that Microsoft has added to their interactive table is the wireless interface support (Bluetooth etc). All the shape and "domino" tags recognition have been done before. It would be interesting to see how many of the developers of other interactive tables have been involved with this project.

    Other interactive tables can be found here.
    http://mtg.upf.es/reactable/?related
    http://www.tangibletable.de/
    http://www.ipsi.fraunhofer.de/ambiente/english/pro jekte/projekte/ineractable.html
    http://www.jamespatten.com/audiopad/
    http://tecfa.unige.ch/perso/staf/nova/blog/2005/01 /10/space-and-place-a-list-fo-interactive-tables/

  203. Another Touch Screen video link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  204. Re:Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscree by ahem · · Score: 1

    You actually can operate it with your butt, and you can operate it after a drink has been spilled on it.

    It works by sensing a change in the way that infrared light is reflected back from a part of the surface that is being touched.

    Take a look here: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industr y/4217348.html?page=2

    --
    Not A Sig
  205. Well, let's look at it this way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft announces the Surface. Apple announces the availability of DRM-free music at iTunes. Now, which product do you think will make the most profit for their respective company during the coming year? The first production units of the Surface, whenever they happen, will be limited to commercial buyers--and not too many of them, I'd guess.

    As an Apple shareholder, all I can say about today's $4.42 gain is "YEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAH!!!"

  206. You can see similar at the Samsung experience NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The samsung experience, in the new time warner building in NYC (Columbus circle) has a large table out front that does this--in a very basic form. Not nearly as advanced, but very cool. You should give it a shot if you are nearby.

  207. Re:Credit where due department (U. of Calgary) by seshat · · Score: 1

    Yet another "credit due" department post. But at least here is a video: http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/wiki/uploads/P ress/07-mediaclip-icore-full.wmv U. of Calgary actually motivated a start up company called SMART technologies to commercialize this technology.

  208. Re: Microsoft's Multitouch Coffee Table Display by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

    "The coffee you are trying to drink may be hot. Allow?"

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  209. ReacTable by zobier · · Score: 1
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  210. Real one in Helsinki by mnbjhguyt · · Score: 1
  211. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by syousef · · Score: 1

    Fucking great. Now my coffee table can disallow high def content and continually ask for activation too.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  212. flashbacks from childhood! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    I know the Microsoft table is like a thousand times more powerful and different but this still gives me flashbacks to the pizza parlour of the early 80's with the PacMan tables that you could sit at, eat pizza, and play against a friend. Of course, I was royally pissed when I found out the tables didn't have a kewl 3D hologram mode. "No? How come? They did it in Robotech!" lol

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  213. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    "RPGs like Dungeons and Dragons are traditionally played on a tabletop using miniatures. The problem is that the players are only supposed to see those parts of the map that they have explored. Gamemasters are reduced to drawing explored sections of the map on the playing surface with dry-erase markers or using cardboard tiles representing stretches of corridor. Some fellows have an expensive but elegant solution. They map out the playing area in a laptop using software such as Tabletop Mapper, which allows to game master to dynamically hide and reveal sections of the map. The laptop is attached to a 1600 lumen DLP projector mounted on the ceiling and projecting an image of the visible map onto the tabletop. The miniatures can then be moved on a dynamic map. The eye candy factor is vastly increased, gamemaster labor is reduced, and the players have more fun. The elegance is that this is an intuitive enhancement of the traditional gaming experience, instead of an unfamiliar new user interface to be mastered." http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/15/ 2146215

    So basically the same thing would be possible with the Microsoft product, just more conveniently. Kewlness.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  214. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Defcon would be a perfect application. Just imagine all the scenes from the movies where you see tactical plots, maps, etc in control rooms and imagine them rendering like this! The one idea I had when I was a kid (influenced by and stolen from others) would be a holotank to update the military dioramas you saw in the good WWII films. You know, when they're planning a complicated raid and need to see the environment in 3D. In this case it would not just be for planning but also for tactical control. Everyone is tied in via packet radio and positions are rendered in the tank in real-time.

    I have a friend who does military work and he says that the real life displays are getting almost as good as RTS games. By this I mean you're talking about integrating sensory data from hundreds of sources into one tactical map that overviews the area you are operating in. In the old days, you're looking at a paper map and are sticking pins in it to indicate where your people are, where contacts are located, etc. With the new system, it's a computer screen and your soldiers have their own GPS to pinpoint their locations, that data is fed back over the tactical radio, and enemy points of contact are also added. Micro-UAV's can be directed over points of contact and give you a bird's eye view of exactly what's going on there. It's almost like playing an RTS with fog of war turned off. :)

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  215. Cleanliness? by Reapy · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is a silly thing to think of, but I've always had a problem when people touch my monitor and leave a hoard of finger prints across the display area. When you have a touch screen, those things get even nastier. All the human hand grease starts to obscure the display, and they are usually a pain in the ass to clean. I guess they probably have some sort of easy clean surfaces on touch devices (not much experience with them), but still...

    I mean I know a few people I wouldn't want touching my mouse or keyboard...you know the guys that leave a grease hand print permanently on your desk if they ever lean on it? Yeah, I wouldn't want those guys smearing their hands all over my display.

    Anyway, neat implementation of a touch interface. I think though that they better add some sorting features to the photos, cause digging through a virtual pile will probably be as annoying as going through your own photo drawer.

  216. Re:Credit where due dept.? ALAS, YES!.. by aqk · · Score: 1

    Alas, yes-

    Someone has INDEED thought of that before.

    His name is goatse (look it up on Wikipedia) and the capacity is apparently phenomenal.

    Work has since ceased on the project, as there was problems involving retention of the objects...

  217. Re:Imagine the possibilities for tabletop gaming . by zentinal · · Score: 1

    FrankNputer asked: Hmm...I wonder what happens when you put your drink on the MS table?
    According to yesterday's story on NPR - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story Id=10554012 - , it's designed to have drinks placed on it, especially drinks in glasses with ID chips, so it can show you an ad associated with what kind of drink you ordered, right next to where your drink is sitting.
  218. I must be missing something by uarch · · Score: 1

    I must be missing something.

    I wasn't that impressed with the whole thing. Yes, the way it handles external storage devices placed on the surface is slick and a few of the UI features use the interface well but overall it doesn't seem very interesting. At least not nearly interesting enough to live up to the hype I've heard over the last two days.

    I've heard claims about how this will revolutionize the way we interact with computers. Someone explain what new things I'll be able to do with this. Some explain how I'll be able to do old things better. (What, am I supposed to send all of my emails as finger-paint jpegs?)

  219. When did Kramer go to work for MS by MoronBob · · Score: 1

    When did Kramer go to work for MS

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  220. Re:Obvious practical issues with horiz. touchscree by jubei · · Score: 1

    It isn't capacitive with PDAs and Tablet PCs. Those are resistive. Laptop trackpads and ipod controls are capacitive. This is optical.

  221. build one yourself by gravano · · Score: 1

    It's a nice product and all, but it's not really that innovative or new that other people within the community haven't thought about or developed. you can easily build a multitouch display yourself. i got some guidelines on my blog on how to build a multitouch display @ www.multitouch.nl. There's also an open source multitouch community called NUIgroup with alot of information about hardware and software related to multitouch @ www.nuigroup.com