Slashdot Mirror


User: DavidTC

DavidTC's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,705
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,705

  1. Re:Showers on Encouraging Female Programmers · · Score: 1

    I just had the funniest mental image of a naked, wet guy running into the computer lab shouting 'Eureka!'. (Or however you spell that.)

  2. Re:The Disease of Political Correctness on Encouraging Female Programmers · · Score: 1

    Wow, can you believe the person who wrote the post I'm responding to got an 800 in verbal, and I just got 650 or so? I guess SAT scores rally don't mean anything. :)

  3. Re:Sorry to say it... on Quack! · · Score: 1
    Oh, really? Bull. Point that line out in the constitution. There is nothing to do with age beside the ages you have to be to run for office, and that little thing that says you can't be stopped from voting if you are over 18. As a matter of fact, your state could let people of any age vote in national elections.

    Legally, the only restrictions on minors are in the laws, not the constitution. (Except for the 'running for office' thing.)

    And laws, as you should know, cannot restrict the constitution.

    People under 18 still have complete freedom of speech. Granted, they can't 'disrupt' school with it, but, neither can you urge people to vote for one person or another at a voting site. The government can make some restrictions on free speech on its property, as long as it does it to stop people who have to be there from getting harrassed.

    You can't walk into the DMV, set up a pulpit, and start preaching either.

    Granted, a lot of schools don't apparently understand this. And the 'disruption of class' arguement is completely overused. Technically, it can't apply to anything you do while not in class.

  4. Re:Linus deserves man of the year, not of the cent on Time's Man of the Century: Linus Torvalds? · · Score: 1

    Let's have a poll! How many of us here in the Internet user community use computers? :)

  5. Re:Uhm... on cDc Charges MS w/ Distributing Cracker Software · · Score: 1
    Good thing we don't have any confusing usages of client and server in the Unix world.

    /me looks at X Windowing System.

    Nevermind. :)

  6. Re:Linus is NOT God. on Forged e-mails from Linus · · Score: 1
    Cracking for serial numbers?

    You mean, figuring what pattern will be used to generate a valid key? Sure, that's legal. Using it to get around licensing restrictions isn't though, and handing out a program that can do that might or might not be, depending on how provable intent is...of course, last I heard, some software companies were trying to make any reverse engineering illegal, I don't know how that's doing.

  7. Re:Suggestions... on Ask Slashdot: GPLed code with non-GPLed output · · Score: 1
    Um...huh? What are you talking about with licenses...nevermind...I can sell you a key that will allow you to add 10 seats, for the low price of 10 dollars. You won't find RedHat offering deals like that!

    And, BTW, saying '...or you're all lame crackers/nukers which is what I suspect anyways.'...well, okay, I won't call you a troll, but that won't change whether you are or not.
    Who's immature here, me or you? :)

  8. Re:This "viral" stuff is all backwards, anyway on Ask Slashdot: GPLed code with non-GPLed output · · Score: 1

    They can use it for whatever they want. They just have to let anyone they give it to use it for whatever they want also. For them to do this, they must be provided with source.

  9. Re:PetrOS - Server OS, not desktop. on PetrOS - NT alternative? · · Score: 1
    Flamebait, flamebait...while I may drive a tractor, it doesn't randomly explode and kill everyone. And, as it's faster then windows, your analogy doesn't hold water.

    (Don't even think of mentioning that web server test...my desktop machine is not a webserver. And I don't have multiple T1s to handle that bandwidth anyway. Or four network cards. I knew which is faster, I used to run Windows on this overclock PPro with 32 megs of RAM.)

  10. Re:success with one of the alternate registrars on NSI Modifies "whois" Agreement · · Score: 1

    Huh?

  11. Re:The ignorance... oh the humanity! on Australian Net Censorship · · Score: 1

    Only wankers say mateship? Isn't the word mateship, in fact, in what passes for a constitution down there?

  12. Re:ok, here goes.. on French revolt against Prime Meridian-Sort Of · · Score: 1
    No, Ford didn't. Ford just used the assembly line. A conveyer belt is all it really is, I'm sure that was invented way, way, way back when, and and I know he didn't invent the idea of runnning something down it and having people do small amount of work at each stop. He just perfected it, and made lots of money.

    I don't know who invented the 'assembly line', but it wasn't Ford.

  13. Re:Finally. on The MS vs. DOJ case arguments end · · Score: 1

    Of course you're right. The companies don't have to use all those MS OSes they do have to pay, for. :)
    Also, if they have do Windows, they aren't allowed to modify the start up..so no multiboot, or anything like that.
    But, yes, no one's forcing them to ship them...just pay for them. :)

  14. BZZZZZZZZT! WRONG!!!!! on Digital VCRs · · Score: 1
    That isn't the law of supply and demand at all.

    From my first year college economics class notes, supply and demand simply states that if there is:

    More of a demand, prices are higher, and
    More of a supply, prices are lower.

    And vis versa, of course. That's supply and demand, Mr. Coward.
    So, WinCE has more of a demand, so either prices or (to counter it out) supplies are higher.

    What you are talking about is just brand names. If it was actually true anyway, every single product that gained market share first would be champion. There is a little bit of resistent to change in marketplaces, but nowhere near this much. If you have a Ph.D in economics, I'll eat this message. Sheesh.

  15. Re:Hate to spoil the fun, but where are the neutro on Suppression of cold fusion research? · · Score: 1
    Didn't you read the article? It's pointing out the sun is technically short neutrons also. Maybe we're wrong about how fusion works.

    And, if we're not, let's figure out where this heat is coming from. It might not be fusion, but maybe we can use it anyway.

  16. Re:curiosity got the cracker arrested... on The War Against The Hackers · · Score: 1

    If he was doing it out of curiosity, he would have stole 1 dollar, not 100,000.

  17. You missed Katz's comments. on Village Voice on Voices From The Hellmouth · · Score: 1

    Katz specifially said he wasn't comparing them to the holocaust survivors. And, no, it's perfectly legit to call them merely surviviors. They survived high school. If you can call a person who walks away from a car wreck a survivor, then you can call anyone who makes it though high school, geek or jock, a survivor. High school is pretty tough.

  18. Re:Letter to the editor on Village Voice on Voices From The Hellmouth · · Score: 1

    Very good point! Someone should take away her 'liberal' card.

  19. What reality are you in? on MS writing Internet Explorer for Linux? · · Score: 1
    Erm, how long has Linux had FAT32 support now? Seven months, maybe? Since 2.0.32 in the standard kernel, and a bit longer if you looked for the patches.

    Now, how long has NT had it? What? You mean it doesn't?

    I won't even comment on that 'easier to use' line, but you're just spewing FUD.

    P.S. Wasn't that 'MS give FAT support to Linux' a segfault article?

  20. Re:Just like Micro$oft... on Microsoft starts anti-Linux Group · · Score: 1

    I can root an NT box...Netbus, anyone?

  21. Re:Just like Micro$oft... on Microsoft starts anti-Linux Group · · Score: 1

    What does that get you? You still have to have copies of windows and office. Save you a reboot, but it doens't mean anything legally.

  22. Re:ADD on Task Processor Found in Human Brain · · Score: 2
    ADD people also have 'hyper-focus' where they only pay attention to one thing.

    So, actually, yes, it's probably something 'wrong' in this part of the brain. Or at least different.

    BTW, I have ADD (Why does "I've ADD" seem wrong? Does anyone really understand why we talk the way we do?), and have what is supposed to be an exception...I read really well and fast and a lot, which is the opposite of the normal of ADD. Does anyone else who 'has ADD' do this?

    I'm actually pretty glad, overall, I have this 'disease'. Deep hack mode is easy, and, luckly, I don't have ADHD, or at least not anymore, so I'm fairly calm physically. :)

  23. Re:What if they figure out were using them as slav on The Emerging-Behavior Debate · · Score: 1

    OMG, he's an AI!

  24. Re:So good on The Emerging-Behavior Debate · · Score: 1

    And the single celled animals. :)

  25. Re:Horrible idea on Should Programmers Be Certified? · · Score: 1
    It's possibly even illegal to require this certification for a job, as it is against federal laws to discriminate based on age...

    That's a common misconception...actually it's just illegal to discriminate against someone if they are too old (over a certain age...maybe 55). This is why lots of companies fire programmers right before that...it's perfectly legal, under a perfectly stupid law.