Now is a good time to point out that their of DNA was based upon work which their in lab research assistant, Rosalind Franklin, conducted. While Watson and Crick won the Nobel Prize nobody ever remembers Franklin.
One needs to look at two different s of how cells communicate with each other: electrochemically and physically.
If an impulse in a nerve cell causes a change in ionic concentration, which causes a conformational change in a surface protein, which causes a conformational change in the surface protein of an adjacent cell, then the signal was transmitted (arguably) through a physical phenomenon: sound.
If an impulse in a nerve cell causes a change in ionic concentration, which causes a conformational change in a surface protein, which causes that protein to release a charged ion across a synapse, which ion is then gathered at a protein on an adjacent cell where the charge is passed on, then the signal was transmitted (arguably) through an energetic phenomenon: electrical.
At the level of molecular orbitals, though, it's all about the same. A molecule or ion of a higher energy state influenced a species of a lower energy state. Energy was passed from one to the other. Since cells don't have ears I doubt that they make any distinction of how the energy is transferred.
Think of rubbing your hands together while looking at them with infrared glasses. While you wouldn't think you're generating any light it will be clear, from the infrared glasses, that your hands, due to the increase in heat, are generating additional radiation in the form of photons in the IR range of the spectrum.
The Centre Party leader claims that defence minister Mikael Odenberg's proposed legislation would merely codify practices that have already been in operation for decades
"Sweden has always listened in as a means of ensuring that we have had the information necessary to protect national security. I don't think that is a secret," said Olofsson at a press conference on Friday.
"All I know is that we do not currently have any surveillance on the cable network. For six decades we had a surveillance system with no regulation and absolutely no protection for private individuals. I think that is forgotten sometimes in this discussion," said Odenberg. The US Federal Government called--it seems that Sweden is infringing on their patent for "Application of the Kansas City Shuffle to a Population of Citizens to Effect Domestic Surveillance Under the Auspices of Preventing Terrorism for the Purpose of Perpetuating Financial Debt"
How much of that can be done with netpbm libraries and an open image format? Why reinvent the wheel for any purpose other than attempting to corner the market?
the fraudsters aren't stupid enough to leave (much) of a paper trail One might even go so far as to say that the laws are specifically written to leave loopholes in which to hide the paper. The closer you are to the social circles which write the rules the better chance you have of knowing where and how to hide the paper.
Short of some organised crime indictment, The Feds won't get involved Due to their continued involvement the Feds should be the recipients of organized crime indictments.
Of course the SEC is acting now. The Federal Senators and Representatives have already made their millions from their priveleged position in the know. Now it's time to ensure that the common people remain in debt.
The largest motivator to write the system from scratch in C is if the list becomes long enough that grep and awk can't process it quickly enough to keep up with incoming requests or if requests come through so often that beating up the disk platters is a consideration. Use a RAMdisk.
Sounds like a task for shell scripts to manipulate an ASCII file and grep | cut | sed or maybe awk if the plain ASCII file is formatted correctly. I don't want to be drawn into UUOC.
Sure you could do it in C if you're familiar with the IO and text manipulations in that language--I always wanted to learn C but never devoted enough free time to it. The largest motivator to write the system from scratch in C is if the list becomes long enough that grep and awk can't process it quickly enough to keep up with incoming requests or if requests come through so often that beating up the disk platters is a consideration.
One IP address per line with twenty or thirty well planned fields, comma separated, should be good for the task. How many functions do you suppose you'd need to manipulate it properly? A well thought out system of functions could probably be reduced to ten or twelve basic functions which could be combined to do nearly anything.
The largest motivator that I find for using someone else's software is that someone else usually has more time to dress it up to look nice and neat on the display. I just make it work.
I don't often see these things as groups of rich guys trying to screw each other over. Usually these things are a sign of rich guys meeting on the golf course and saying,"You know, if we make it look like we're at each other's throats, then we could slowly and carefully raise the monthly rates on the millions of investing idiots who take the news at face value every morning."
Which group of rich guys did this benefit? Even rich guys stratify. Usually the stratification of rich guys gives insight into upcoming political posturing. Which politicians now find themselves in the group of rich guys with more money as a result of this ruling? Is this ruling balanced by any other recent rulings which might have moved money in a different direction?
What specifically is it about the spreadsheet m0del which is insufficient? I don't manage large blocks of IP addresses and subnets so I'm not familiar with the information which you'll be compiling or how you'll need to manipulate and mine it.
When other people figure out a complex organizational scheme for a spreadsheet they often turn it into a database. If you have kept a spreadsheet for a similar task, on a smaller scale, then you should be able to identify very quickly which axes you need to expand in order to accomodate the larger task.
Was it your sig that, at one time, held a link to Article V's Repeal the 17th page? That page has my favorite link for expressing, neatly and with footnote documentation, how the legislators have slowly and carefully destroyed the power of the states. As if the Civil War didn't do enough to that end.
Although I don't agree with the underlying principle of slavery (inescapable debt is slavery, and there's plenty of that today), I have a great respect for the SCOTUS decision elaborated here. In the discussion of the SCOTUS decision from 1857 it is quite plain that, at least at that time, the Supreme Court recognized that Congress tried, on occasion, to pass laws which were outside of its legal authority. I guess they didn't have the "interstate commerce" excuse back then or, more likely, the lawyers and judges knew that the legal definition of commerce, as it applied to the Constitution, was specifically limited.
I completely agree with the sentiment that we should keep the federal government out of our schools. If they are going to take the money, and if they are going to go to great lengths to squelch (or infinitely regulate) private and home-schooling, then we might as well have some say on where that money is spent.
The federal government may only directly fund 2% of the average school budget but through their control of the distribution of money they can influence the other 98%. All money (well, a vast majority) goes to DC before it comes back to the states and the money which doesn't go directly to DC is controlled by DC through any number of other systems.
Ideally, yes, we taxpayers keep our money and use it to locally decide how things are done. That was the spirit of the 9th and 10th Amendments and the restriction of the authority of the federal government. Until we can move back to that system, though, we can at least hope that the money comes back in salaries.
I've never heard that one before... running interference, the pointing game, distract the farmer while stealing his chickens... the Kansas City Shuffle. Heh.:)
The system you propose has an added bonus: If you can effectively squelch the real source of the thinking then you can take credit for the solutions to promote yourself.
Maybe we could save some of that money spent on establishing military control of nations on the other side of the globe and use it to fund our educational system.
I'm not suggesting that it will keep people from buying MS products (though that would be nice, in the long run). What is more important is to encourage a frame of mind in the American consumers that such things can and do happen, on a regular basis, and the people who are making use of those systems may have some very severe ulterior motives.
With respect to "ulterior motives" most American consumers are nearly completely compromised by their consumerism mindset. People, in general, need careful guidance to stay focused on things which are important but which may be hidden from plain sight.
The particular 3D crystalline form can differ even from one recrystallization solvent to another. In extreme cases a different configuration at even one rotatable center may significantly affect the shape of the rest of the protein.
The hope is that a given protein remains within a particular probability space and that the shape of the active site, refined gradually over millions of years, is highly stable. When 3/4 of drugs entering phase I clinical trials fail efficacy, though, the numbers speak for themselves.
There really is nothing to see for those who are technically literate to the operation of modern systems. This sort of thing, however, should be included as a sticker on the front of all MS products as the majority of the population probably does not think about the consequences of callbacks. Most consumers, whom I've met, actively avoid products which obviously track their movements unless the product is highly desirable (eg. cellular telephones). Making the reality of callbacks more popularly known would have a definite impact on the decisions which consumers make.
While it is fairly easy to predict the geometric shape of a small molecule the more difficult question is one of alignment. If an entire set of molecules, typified as more than one hundred, is considered then how are all of them aligned in 3D space such that they can be properly fit into the target active site?
I'm disappointed that I cannot read the actual article. While at Abbott (informally) and while at Battelle (in formal intellectual property documentation), I proposed that a vector (the term "vector " was in my IP release forms) for describing molecules in 3D space based on electronegativity, eletrophilicity, nucleophilicity, entropy (freedom of mation), and bulk (volume).
Slashdot Mirror
Now is a good time to point out that their of DNA was based upon work which their in lab research assistant, Rosalind Franklin, conducted. While Watson and Crick won the Nobel Prize nobody ever remembers Franklin.
One needs to look at two different s of how cells communicate with each other: electrochemically and physically.
If an impulse in a nerve cell causes a change in ionic concentration, which causes a conformational change in a surface protein, which causes a conformational change in the surface protein of an adjacent cell, then the signal was transmitted (arguably) through a physical phenomenon: sound.
If an impulse in a nerve cell causes a change in ionic concentration, which causes a conformational change in a surface protein, which causes that protein to release a charged ion across a synapse, which ion is then gathered at a protein on an adjacent cell where the charge is passed on, then the signal was transmitted (arguably) through an energetic phenomenon: electrical.
At the level of molecular orbitals, though, it's all about the same. A molecule or ion of a higher energy state influenced a species of a lower energy state. Energy was passed from one to the other. Since cells don't have ears I doubt that they make any distinction of how the energy is transferred.
Think of rubbing your hands together while looking at them with infrared glasses. While you wouldn't think you're generating any light it will be clear, from the infrared glasses, that your hands, due to the increase in heat, are generating additional radiation in the form of photons in the IR range of the spectrum.
Googlefight agrees
How much of that can be done with netpbm libraries and an open image format? Why reinvent the wheel for any purpose other than attempting to corner the market?
Everything else is a product of the software suite to support the format.
Isn't tiff the most freely available raw picture format?
Of course the SEC is acting now. The Federal Senators and Representatives have already made their millions from their priveleged position in the know. Now it's time to ensure that the common people remain in debt.
I wonder what would happen if they could work with these guys.
Sounds like a task for shell scripts to manipulate an ASCII file and grep | cut | sed or maybe awk if the plain ASCII file is formatted correctly. I don't want to be drawn into UUOC.
Sure you could do it in C if you're familiar with the IO and text manipulations in that language--I always wanted to learn C but never devoted enough free time to it. The largest motivator to write the system from scratch in C is if the list becomes long enough that grep and awk can't process it quickly enough to keep up with incoming requests or if requests come through so often that beating up the disk platters is a consideration.
One IP address per line with twenty or thirty well planned fields, comma separated, should be good for the task. How many functions do you suppose you'd need to manipulate it properly? A well thought out system of functions could probably be reduced to ten or twelve basic functions which could be combined to do nearly anything.
The largest motivator that I find for using someone else's software is that someone else usually has more time to dress it up to look nice and neat on the display. I just make it work.
I don't often see these things as groups of rich guys trying to screw each other over. Usually these things are a sign of rich guys meeting on the golf course and saying,"You know, if we make it look like we're at each other's throats, then we could slowly and carefully raise the monthly rates on the millions of investing idiots who take the news at face value every morning."
Which group of rich guys did this benefit? Even rich guys stratify. Usually the stratification of rich guys gives insight into upcoming political posturing. Which politicians now find themselves in the group of rich guys with more money as a result of this ruling? Is this ruling balanced by any other recent rulings which might have moved money in a different direction?
Create debt. Maintain debt. Keep people in debt. Work them until they die of debt.
How does this judgement affect the greater system?
What specifically is it about the spreadsheet m0del which is insufficient? I don't manage large blocks of IP addresses and subnets so I'm not familiar with the information which you'll be compiling or how you'll need to manipulate and mine it.
When other people figure out a complex organizational scheme for a spreadsheet they often turn it into a database. If you have kept a spreadsheet for a similar task, on a smaller scale, then you should be able to identify very quickly which axes you need to expand in order to accomodate the larger task.
Was it your sig that, at one time, held a link to Article V's Repeal the 17th page? That page has my favorite link for expressing, neatly and with footnote documentation, how the legislators have slowly and carefully destroyed the power of the states. As if the Civil War didn't do enough to that end.
Although I don't agree with the underlying principle of slavery (inescapable debt is slavery, and there's plenty of that today), I have a great respect for the SCOTUS decision elaborated here. In the discussion of the SCOTUS decision from 1857 it is quite plain that, at least at that time, the Supreme Court recognized that Congress tried, on occasion, to pass laws which were outside of its legal authority. I guess they didn't have the "interstate commerce" excuse back then or, more likely, the lawyers and judges knew that the legal definition of commerce, as it applied to the Constitution, was specifically limited.
Joe had programmed Sploosh to respond to requests of "barley pop" by pitching one over.
I completely agree with the sentiment that we should keep the federal government out of our schools. If they are going to take the money, and if they are going to go to great lengths to squelch (or infinitely regulate) private and home-schooling, then we might as well have some say on where that money is spent.
The federal government may only directly fund 2% of the average school budget but through their control of the distribution of money they can influence the other 98%. All money (well, a vast majority) goes to DC before it comes back to the states and the money which doesn't go directly to DC is controlled by DC through any number of other systems.
Ideally, yes, we taxpayers keep our money and use it to locally decide how things are done. That was the spirit of the 9th and 10th Amendments and the restriction of the authority of the federal government. Until we can move back to that system, though, we can at least hope that the money comes back in salaries.
I've never heard that one before... running interference, the pointing game, distract the farmer while stealing his chickens... the Kansas City Shuffle. Heh. :)
The system you propose has an added bonus: If you can effectively squelch the real source of the thinking then you can take credit for the solutions to promote yourself.
Brilliant!
Maybe we could save some of that money spent on establishing military control of nations on the other side of the globe and use it to fund our educational system.
I'm not suggesting that it will keep people from buying MS products (though that would be nice, in the long run). What is more important is to encourage a frame of mind in the American consumers that such things can and do happen, on a regular basis, and the people who are making use of those systems may have some very severe ulterior motives.
With respect to "ulterior motives" most American consumers are nearly completely compromised by their consumerism mindset. People, in general, need careful guidance to stay focused on things which are important but which may be hidden from plain sight.
The particular 3D crystalline form can differ even from one recrystallization solvent to another. In extreme cases a different configuration at even one rotatable center may significantly affect the shape of the rest of the protein.
The hope is that a given protein remains within a particular probability space and that the shape of the active site, refined gradually over millions of years, is highly stable. When 3/4 of drugs entering phase I clinical trials fail efficacy, though, the numbers speak for themselves.
There really is nothing to see for those who are technically literate to the operation of modern systems. This sort of thing, however, should be included as a sticker on the front of all MS products as the majority of the population probably does not think about the consequences of callbacks. Most consumers, whom I've met, actively avoid products which obviously track their movements unless the product is highly desirable (eg. cellular telephones). Making the reality of callbacks more popularly known would have a definite impact on the decisions which consumers make.
While it is fairly easy to predict the geometric shape of a small molecule the more difficult question is one of alignment. If an entire set of molecules, typified as more than one hundred, is considered then how are all of them aligned in 3D space such that they can be properly fit into the target active site?
I'm disappointed that I cannot read the actual article. While at Abbott (informally) and while at Battelle (in formal intellectual property documentation), I proposed that a vector (the term "vector " was in my IP release forms) for describing molecules in 3D space based on electronegativity, eletrophilicity, nucleophilicity, entropy (freedom of mation), and bulk (volume).