"I sure hope any potential employers google "Robert Soloway" and find "Spam king" high on the results list."
Thats what a name change is for, and while I'm aware of putting other names in on applications, in many states theres a sunset on how far back they can look for name changes and for convictions.
Washington's law is 7 or 10 years I think.
I actually had a fight over a job in Washington 2 years ago. The form said "within last 7 years" and I'd had a conviction for a misdemeanor 16 years ago, so I didn't put anything in. I was offered the job, then the background check hit that and I had the offer pulled back. I was about to start fighting it, then I moved to Alaska for more money.
"I wonder if there's some variation of Megan's Law requiring him to register with the local police department and notify all his neighbors with computers?"
No there isn't, and after he has completed his parole he can apply for a name change in case his current name and reputation makes it hard to find employment.
No, the law was that a Black or other minority had to give up their seat if a white person wanted it. Rosa Parks wasn't the first to resist, just the first one who worked at the NAACP.
Claudette Colvin, a 15 year old high school student, had resisted 9 months earlier and it was her case that went to the US Supreme Court and it was her case that ended bus segregation.
"Without proper authority" and "gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly." is going to be enough to find him guilty in a Court Martial.
If the Army can prove he leaked intelligence to anyone and that intelligence has been published or worse, referred to by Al Qadea or other militants, Manning will be found guilty, and rightly so.
When aircraft hit hard things they don't leave big pieces behind. I was involved in the salvage of a Piper PA-28 (N7731W) along with my grandfather and uncle. In that case the aircraft had a engine failure at about 90 mph while at 1000-1500 agl. There wasn't much left, when the 757-223 hit the Pentagon it was going over 500 mph and hit a reenforced concrete and steel building, it was lucky that even wheels and blade disk were found.
Also, when jet aircraft with a lot of fuel crash they burn, often hot enough to melt aluminum and composites. Like the C-130 during Desert One, Pan Am Flight 1736 from 1977, the C-17 from Elmendorf in 2010, etc
Read the summary before you editorialize Timothy. Yea, alot of people still had and still have modems, there has been a need for faxing documents and back then there weren't alot of pdf to fax services.
I wouldn't say Law Enforcement is totally incompetent, I've dealt with totally competent local and Federal Law Enforcement agents.
And I've encountered totally competent TSA agents, only in Anchorage, Las Vegas and Seattle though, dealt with some morons in South Dakota and Portland.
I don't think it's an advantage for Anonymous to not be shackled by laws, its really not a good thing to have a vigilante group operating unfettered by the law. Sure Anonymous is doing what some of us want and doing it to the people someone of want it done to, but what happens when they turn on us?
I don't think for a second that Anonymous won't someday turn on us, the Reign of Terror, Russian Revolution, Great Leap Forward, Killing Fields shows that those who are unhindered by the law and can make the rules up as they go along will decide they are the law and everyone else is is breaking the law.
Somehow I think of Hoover era FBI tactics and Cointelpro CIA tactics were in effect right now he would be screaming for Constitutionality and enforcement of the law.
So if the west had left Gaddafi isolated he'd have deliverable chemical weapons, the people would have limited social media access (Libya was on the no crypto, no advanced computers, no advanced software lists until 2005), limited cellular options and thus limited ways to organize.
So opening up Libya is bad because the United States was involved?
Really? You don't remember that whole Bosnia-Croatia-Kosovo thing? The EU couldn't keep the peace 300 miles from Rome. The NATO/Russian lead Dayton Accords ended the war in Bosnia after three years of failed EU attempts.
I also remember IFOR in Bosnia having alot of American units, in fact Task Force Eagle's US Army units made up the bulk of the ground forces there in Bosnia.
100,000 people died in Bosnia because of the EU's successful peacekeeping. 10,000+ dead in Kosovo and another 120,000 dead in the break up of Yugoslavia.
If we are talking about keeping the peace in Europe, why didn't the US Army, BAOR/British Forces Germany and Soviet Guard Armies get nominated? They are the forces that kept Europe from blowing up from 1945 to 1991, then the Russians, British, Americans and French rolled down to fix Bosnia.
No, US and French carrier based aircraft are not STOL modified aircraft.
STOL is an acronym for short take-off and landing, a term used to describe aircraft with very short runway requirements. F-18, Rafale, EA-6, C-2, E-2,, Super Étendard, for example either use a catapult for take off and arrestors for landing, those don't make something STOL.
Super Hornet does have a refueling capability with the center line refueling tank and four extra fuel tanks.
Yes, the E-2C and D are jokes, thats why they've been used by a number of countries for over 40 years and continue to have upgrades. They only directed American fighters and strike aircraft through Vietnam, Lebanon, the Gulf of Sidra, the Tanker War, Desert Storm, Bosnia, Kosovo, OIF and thousands upon thousands of refugee and drug interdictions.
US carriers operate traditional fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft, up to and including two engine turboprop cargo and AWACS aircraft.
Like my post pointed out, the land bases for Libya are some distance away, to operate a No Fly Zone over Libya from land bases in the northern Med, tankers and SAR would have to be moved into place before anything could happen.
Combat radius of an F-16 on a CAP is about 500 miles, so to fly from Sicily to northern Libya is going to require two refuelings (one down for time on station, one back), three for southern Libya.
Italy's Typhoon has a range of 100 miles for a three hour CAP, the same amount of fuel or an extra tanking.
An F-18E/F from a carrier has combat radius for air to air interdiction of 450 miles, plus the F-18E/F can carry tanks to refuel other F-18E/Fs or aircraft with a refueling probe (Rafale, US Navy/Marine aircraft, Typhoon). Plus because it's an aircraft carrier it can operate much closer to shore than Sicily/Crete or Malta are.
Discussions about the survivability of carriers against China or Russia are moot and off topic, we are talking about a No Fly Zone against Libya.
If the US and UK hadn't bridged the gap, then he'd had mustard gas to drop on the Free Libya movement and social networking technologies like Twitter, Skype would be banned from distribution to Libya.
As it is now, there is mustard gas a few hundred km south of Tripoli (where the US/UK can see it from satellite) at a military base but no bomb canisters for deploying it.
Also, the United States Navy has a long and storied history of farking up Libyan air defenses, even when Gaddafi controlled the entire area and the military was loyal.
Slashdot Mirror
I think the guy should be banned from computer ownership and work for at least twice the time Mitnick was originally banned.
And stick him with only access to a land line too.
I don't condone killing him or a database for computer offenders by any means.
You didn't read the summary did you?
"I sure hope any potential employers google "Robert Soloway" and find "Spam king" high on the results list."
Thats what a name change is for, and while I'm aware of putting other names in on applications, in many states theres a sunset on how far back they can look for name changes and for convictions.
Washington's law is 7 or 10 years I think.
I actually had a fight over a job in Washington 2 years ago. The form said "within last 7 years" and I'd had a conviction for a misdemeanor 16 years ago, so I didn't put anything in. I was offered the job, then the background check hit that and I had the offer pulled back. I was about to start fighting it, then I moved to Alaska for more money.
Mine is Mossy. Mossburg 590A1
"I wonder if there's some variation of Megan's Law requiring him to register with the local police department and notify all his neighbors with computers?"
No there isn't, and after he has completed his parole he can apply for a name change in case his current name and reputation makes it hard to find employment.
"...gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly."
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/10/A/II/47/X/904
The US Supreme Court ruled in 1942 that an enemy doesn't have to be in uniform and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 further defines it.
He is going to rot in prison.
No, but there was a war and there remains a war in Afghanistan, Al Qadea and the Taliban remain there.
No one, this is the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not the regular US Legal System.
No, the law was that a Black or other minority had to give up their seat if a white person wanted it. Rosa Parks wasn't the first to resist, just the first one who worked at the NAACP.
Claudette Colvin, a 15 year old high school student, had resisted 9 months earlier and it was her case that went to the US Supreme Court and it was her case that ended bus segregation.
Theres not a war?
Department of Defense begs to differ.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_War_on_Terrorism_Service_Medal
The President agrees that there is a war.
"Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Inauguration/story?id=6689022&page=1
Congress also agrees that there is a war
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Terrorists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
"Without proper authority" and "gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly." is going to be enough to find him guilty in a Court Martial.
If the Army can prove he leaked intelligence to anyone and that intelligence has been published or worse, referred to by Al Qadea or other militants, Manning will be found guilty, and rightly so.
1. Its a Pentagon. A five-sided polygon. A pentagram is a five-pointed star drawn with five straight strokes.
2. The video is not "classified" it's been out and available for years with stills from it available from 9-11-01 on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pentagon_Security_Camera_2.ogv
3. Wreckage from the 757-223 was clearly visible and photos are available if you look around.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg
When aircraft hit hard things they don't leave big pieces behind. I was involved in the salvage of a Piper PA-28 (N7731W) along with my grandfather and uncle. In that case the aircraft had a engine failure at about 90 mph while at 1000-1500 agl. There wasn't much left, when the 757-223 hit the Pentagon it was going over 500 mph and hit a reenforced concrete and steel building, it was lucky that even wheels and blade disk were found.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
Also, when jet aircraft with a lot of fuel crash they burn, often hot enough to melt aluminum and composites.
Like the C-130 during Desert One, Pan Am Flight 1736 from 1977, the C-17 from Elmendorf in 2010, etc
757-223s don't carry warheads.
P-700 Granit, although SS-N-19 Shipwreck is the preferred name in the West.
I'll rate that 2/10, you used too many crazy references in one paragraph.
Summary execution for 'em.
Read the summary before you editorialize Timothy. Yea, alot of people still had and still have modems, there has been a need for faxing documents and back then there weren't alot of pdf to fax services.
I wouldn't say Law Enforcement is totally incompetent, I've dealt with totally competent local and Federal Law Enforcement agents.
And I've encountered totally competent TSA agents, only in Anchorage, Las Vegas and Seattle though, dealt with some morons in South Dakota and Portland.
I don't think it's an advantage for Anonymous to not be shackled by laws, its really not a good thing to have a vigilante group operating unfettered by the law. Sure Anonymous is doing what some of us want and doing it to the people someone of want it done to, but what happens when they turn on us?
I don't think for a second that Anonymous won't someday turn on us, the Reign of Terror, Russian Revolution, Great Leap Forward, Killing Fields shows that those who are unhindered by the law and can make the rules up as they go along will decide they are the law and everyone else is is breaking the law.
Somehow I think of Hoover era FBI tactics and Cointelpro CIA tactics were in effect right now he would be screaming for Constitutionality and enforcement of the law.
No, law enforcement is hampered by the law and Constitution.
Anonymous aren't shackled by laws.
So if the west had left Gaddafi isolated he'd have deliverable chemical weapons, the people would have limited social media access (Libya was on the no crypto, no advanced computers, no advanced software lists until 2005), limited cellular options and thus limited ways to organize.
So opening up Libya is bad because the United States was involved?
Obama supports war and he got the Nobel Peace Prize.
Really? You don't remember that whole Bosnia-Croatia-Kosovo thing? The EU couldn't keep the peace 300 miles from Rome. The NATO/Russian lead Dayton Accords ended the war in Bosnia after three years of failed EU attempts.
I also remember IFOR in Bosnia having alot of American units, in fact Task Force Eagle's US Army units made up the bulk of the ground forces there in Bosnia.
100,000 people died in Bosnia because of the EU's successful peacekeeping. 10,000+ dead in Kosovo and another 120,000 dead in the break up of Yugoslavia.
If we are talking about keeping the peace in Europe, why didn't the US Army, BAOR/British Forces Germany and Soviet Guard Armies get nominated? They are the forces that kept Europe from blowing up from 1945 to 1991, then the Russians, British, Americans and French rolled down to fix Bosnia.
No, US and French carrier based aircraft are not STOL modified aircraft.
STOL is an acronym for short take-off and landing, a term used to describe aircraft with very short runway requirements. F-18, Rafale, EA-6, C-2, E-2,, Super Étendard, for example either use a catapult for take off and arrestors for landing, those don't make something STOL.
Super Hornet does have a refueling capability with the center line refueling tank and four extra fuel tanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-18E#Tanker_role
Yes, the E-2C and D are jokes, thats why they've been used by a number of countries for over 40 years and continue to have upgrades. They only directed American fighters and strike aircraft through Vietnam, Lebanon, the Gulf of Sidra, the Tanker War, Desert Storm, Bosnia, Kosovo, OIF and thousands upon thousands of refugee and drug interdictions.
US carriers don't operate STOL aircraft.
US carriers operate traditional fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft, up to and including two engine turboprop cargo and AWACS aircraft.
Like my post pointed out, the land bases for Libya are some distance away, to operate a No Fly Zone over Libya from land bases in the northern Med, tankers and SAR would have to be moved into place before anything could happen.
Combat radius of an F-16 on a CAP is about 500 miles, so to fly from Sicily to northern Libya is going to require two refuelings (one down for time on station, one back), three for southern Libya.
Italy's Typhoon has a range of 100 miles for a three hour CAP, the same amount of fuel or an extra tanking.
An F-18E/F from a carrier has combat radius for air to air interdiction of 450 miles, plus the F-18E/F can carry tanks to refuel other F-18E/Fs or aircraft with a refueling probe (Rafale, US Navy/Marine aircraft, Typhoon). Plus because it's an aircraft carrier it can operate much closer to shore than Sicily/Crete or Malta are.
Discussions about the survivability of carriers against China or Russia are moot and off topic, we are talking about a No Fly Zone against Libya.
Bringing Gaddafi in from the cold was a good deal in 2003-2004. The guy did give up his WMD program to the US/UK and opened up for inspections.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/2011227162155530547.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_weapon_proliferation#Libya
If the US and UK hadn't bridged the gap, then he'd had mustard gas to drop on the Free Libya movement and social networking technologies like Twitter, Skype would be banned from distribution to Libya.
As it is now, there is mustard gas a few hundred km south of Tripoli (where the US/UK can see it from satellite) at a military base but no bomb canisters for deploying it.
Also, the United States Navy has a long and storied history of farking up Libyan air defenses, even when Gaddafi controlled the entire area and the military was loyal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Sidra_incident_(1981)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_in_the_Gulf_of_Sidra_(1986)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Libya#U.S._forces_and_targets - look to the A-6 and A-7 targets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Sidra_incident_(1989)