most of those people I suspect thrive on ebay, they pick up a cheep used android phone to limp along, thats what my girlfriend did when her android phone died.
Why doesn't anyone make a decent electric commuter car. I would buy a car with a 150 mi range but I'm not going to buy something crazy just to drive back and forth to work and run errands. Something compact, say golf sized, maybe with a with 2 or 4 doors and without all the crazy bells and whistles of this car. I would think something like that would sell well.
What they want, is for you to buy an apple TV and an iPad and a MacBook Air and an iPhone, they really don't care as much about content distribution as you think they do.
So the real question is, how big of a tax is "hefty"
This is what bothers me about tax discussions. People say if we tax the rich then there will never be any jobs ever, but if we tax the hell out of the poor there will be nobody buying and still no jobs. The key is finding a balance, finding a tax level that provides you with the result you want in terms of income and impact on behavior, not declaring a tax bad because if it was too high it would ruin everything.
Well people have stayed on the space station for up to 200 days at a go.
It might weight on your mind and it might weigh on mine, but there are a lot of people who are very well suited to that kind of thing, I suspect most of it is just not dwelling on it rather than simply being indomitable in the face of danger.
It depends on what you are developing. If your app is targeted at people who will only use the App store (i.e. non professional, less technical home users) then you certainly should be in the app store. Why are you implying that being in the app store would be a bad thing? Because you have to have your application sand boxed? That sounds like a good thing to me and a terrible reason to avoid the app store.
Did you not bother to read the summary or is your blind obsessive hatred and ire just so powerful that you had to post something incredibly stupid due to some automatic reflex?
Same for your "when they zig, you zag" idea: I have never heard of anyone using game theory that doesn't account for (and in fact, predict) that sort of behavior.
Yea, but when I know that you know that I know that when you zig Im going to zag I might just zig anyway!
I get where you are coming from, but don't underestimate the will of people with money and property and the lengths they will go to to protect the value of that money or property.
given that there are hundreds of strains of HPV and the 2 vaccines cover something like 16 strains between them it is quite possible for this vaccine to be useful even to someone who has been exposed. Many men could be carrying very common strains of HPV but not be carrying one of the most dangerous strains (some of which are targeted by these vaccines).
Of course the problem isn't that you can't get the vaccine, you can, but your insurance won't pay for it. What it comes down to is its not financially beneficial enough to vaccinate you (an older male) especially when the person most likely to end up with a problem from your HPV infection is a woman who is not necessarily even with the same insurance company.
Actually there seems to be evidence that it might be linked to throat cancer and possibly prostate cancer. Plus if men are vaccinated they cannot pass on these varieties of HPV to unvaccinated partners so that helps too.
Maybe we should get rid of the current loan system and instead plunge that money into providing a free (or cheep/subsidized) education at State schools. The amount they can charge per student could be held down by the government to manageable levels. They could provide free education to in state applicants and perhaps a reasonable surcharge for out of state applicants. They would most likely not be allowed to keep all of expensive administrator and dean positions staffed at the high rates of pay that they are currently at, but hey, times are tough all around.
Sure, it would be prohibitively expensive to go to big private schools but as more and more people opt out of that they would also have to drop tuition, especially with no federal loan money headed their way. The result is a system where people can still get a degree but high end schools are forced to come down in price to stay viable.
Slashdot Mirror
One would think you could code a new power adaptor to an existing piece of hardware. But your totally right about mac laptop adaptors.
Dongles get lost, power adaptors generally stick around far longer than the actually electronics they were purchased with.
Clearly your just not working enough hours. You should give up on sleeping so much... sleep is for the poor.
most of those people I suspect thrive on ebay, they pick up a cheep used android phone to limp along, thats what my girlfriend did when her android phone died.
isn't your time worth more than $.99?
First one, then the other.
Why doesn't anyone make a decent electric commuter car. I would buy a car with a 150 mi range but I'm not going to buy something crazy just to drive back and forth to work and run errands. Something compact, say golf sized, maybe with a with 2 or 4 doors and without all the crazy bells and whistles of this car. I would think something like that would sell well.
What they want, is for you to buy an apple TV and an iPad and a MacBook Air and an iPhone, they really don't care as much about content distribution as you think they do.
So the real question is, how big of a tax is "hefty"
This is what bothers me about tax discussions. People say if we tax the rich then there will never be any jobs ever, but if we tax the hell out of the poor there will be nobody buying and still no jobs. The key is finding a balance, finding a tax level that provides you with the result you want in terms of income and impact on behavior, not declaring a tax bad because if it was too high it would ruin everything.
Well people have stayed on the space station for up to 200 days at a go.
It might weight on your mind and it might weigh on mine, but there are a lot of people who are very well suited to that kind of thing, I suspect most of it is just not dwelling on it rather than simply being indomitable in the face of danger.
It depends on what you are developing. If your app is targeted at people who will only use the App store (i.e. non professional, less technical home users) then you certainly should be in the app store. Why are you implying that being in the app store would be a bad thing? Because you have to have your application sand boxed? That sounds like a good thing to me and a terrible reason to avoid the app store.
that is one of the nice things about the set up, they can update the servers and automatically improve the quality of the interaction for all users.
Wow dude, wow.
Did you not bother to read the summary or is your blind obsessive hatred and ire just so powerful that you had to post something incredibly stupid due to some automatic reflex?
Its a shame they didn't bother to test it before they released it.
I for one would love to see republicans forced to actually filibuster, it would make good fodder for the Daily Show at least.
But checking the tracks is hard and expensive and doesn't give anyone a chance to grope someone else against their will.
So what your saying is that your up to date because Google hasn't bothered to add any features to their OS in 3 years.
Same for your "when they zig, you zag" idea: I have never heard of anyone using game theory that doesn't account for (and in fact, predict) that sort of behavior.
Yea, but when I know that you know that I know that when you zig Im going to zag I might just zig anyway!
I get where you are coming from, but don't underestimate the will of people with money and property and the lengths they will go to to protect the value of that money or property.
given that there are hundreds of strains of HPV and the 2 vaccines cover something like 16 strains between them it is quite possible for this vaccine to be useful even to someone who has been exposed. Many men could be carrying very common strains of HPV but not be carrying one of the most dangerous strains (some of which are targeted by these vaccines).
Of course the problem isn't that you can't get the vaccine, you can, but your insurance won't pay for it. What it comes down to is its not financially beneficial enough to vaccinate you (an older male) especially when the person most likely to end up with a problem from your HPV infection is a woman who is not necessarily even with the same insurance company.
Actually there seems to be evidence that it might be linked to throat cancer and possibly prostate cancer. Plus if men are vaccinated they cannot pass on these varieties of HPV to unvaccinated partners so that helps too.
Because it never actually worked.
Maybe we should get rid of the current loan system and instead plunge that money into providing a free (or cheep/subsidized) education at State schools. The amount they can charge per student could be held down by the government to manageable levels. They could provide free education to in state applicants and perhaps a reasonable surcharge for out of state applicants. They would most likely not be allowed to keep all of expensive administrator and dean positions staffed at the high rates of pay that they are currently at, but hey, times are tough all around.
Sure, it would be prohibitively expensive to go to big private schools but as more and more people opt out of that they would also have to drop tuition, especially with no federal loan money headed their way. The result is a system where people can still get a degree but high end schools are forced to come down in price to stay viable.
So the answer is to cut off higher education at the knees and hope that eventually the market comes around before we enter a new dark age?
Maybe there is some other way we could go about doing this.
Where God fails to provide, society must take up the slack.