You know, "RMS Free" is a lot clearer than "Free", "Libre", blah blah. You say "RMS Free", and we all know what that means, and those that don't know won't falsely assume they know.
Yep. I'd hold my nose and hock it to class-action specialists just to piss off the pharma bastards. Spending gobloads on TV ads, but a measly 20k for this? Scumbags.
O'Reilly's Nutshell series have become rather inconsistent. Java series particularly I found useless waste of tree, but the Python one by Martelli was very good, complements the online doc very well.
Would be good to compare this title with Martelli's.
I've only done one semester of one of them "stats for engineering and science", and even that little made me realize how hairy stats are, and that was decades ago. Just try define precisely what "probability" means.
The sorriest thing is the social scientists trying to make their case using stats they have little understanding of, applying to their subjects which are way, way more more complex than those of physical science. Even worse is the medical science.
Slashdot Mirror
Hah, leaky disciplines.
God forbids if a name should suggest something of substance.
Dude, you are so fired for not clearing with the legal before posting.
You know, "RMS Free" is a lot clearer than "Free", "Libre", blah blah. You say "RMS Free", and we all know what that means, and those that don't know won't falsely assume they know.
You carbon-spewing denier fool! ;-)
Yep. I'd hold my nose and hock it to class-action specialists just to piss off the pharma bastards. Spending gobloads on TV ads, but a measly 20k for this? Scumbags.
One day my dog can trade in the market, generate enough income to pay for its dog food and let me retire.
Ooooh, we all talk like com techs. Aren't we all so clever?
Professional service is not suitable for short-term volunteering - better dig a ditch or something simple like that.
O'Reilly's Nutshell series have become rather inconsistent. Java series particularly I found useless waste of tree, but the Python one by Martelli was very good, complements the online doc very well.
Would be good to compare this title with Martelli's.
Haven't mucked with GDB for a long time. Are you still SOA when it comes to threading? Maybe GDB can use some work on that?
I thought I was old cuz I lost plenty hair, but I'm lost on this one.
Yep, one costs you 25, the other diddly squat.
You should have listened to Heathrow, not that it would help...
Get a clue. We are just waiting for SP3 before upgrading.
There is this book "Bad Samaritan" - a well-argued polemic making the case. Worth a read.
Cuz increasingly that's all we have left. Especially now that money-printing business has hit the fan.
Is there a study of why we sometimes sub same-sounding words when typing in stream-of-conscious style? Might be something there...
Yeah, probably makes sense only for DSPs and microcontrollers. But then isn't 68k used as microcontrollers now?
We used to say there were two many layers of shit. Now it's truly "turtles all the way down."
What you say? This aggression will not stand? That's like, your opinion, man.
Comes off, you say?
But I tell you, Jay Leno is a total douche. And NBC is sabotaging itself right as it is being bought by that evil cable company.
All hail COCO!
Is that number just pulled out of their ass? Is there a base for it?
I've only done one semester of one of them "stats for engineering and science", and even that little made me realize how hairy stats are, and that was decades ago. Just try define precisely what "probability" means.
The sorriest thing is the social scientists trying to make their case using stats they have little understanding of, applying to their subjects which are way, way more more complex than those of physical science. Even worse is the medical science.
It's like thousand primitive blind men making barely educated guesses, and the money involved gags any notion of humility in their proclamations.