Then they stumble around blindly and starve, because they ate/transformed all humans. Then they eat each other. Then the sun rises and life forms anew on the planet.
You're wrong. It prevents downstream proxies from caching, but Google is perfectly capable of putting the SSL layer in-front of Varnish/Squid, and caching rather than always hit the backend.
Uhm, just because it's also caching doesn't mean it's the caching that is discussed, so wtf are you even talking about..
So much of the web is dynamically generated that caching hasn't been very useful in a long time
What? Just because something is dynamically generated doesn't mean it magically changes each time it's requested, or that it can't use last-modified or etag headers and implement "304 not modified", or be explicit about what is to be cached for how long, and under which circumstances. Again, what are you even talking about. Seems like you're just stringing words together.
Nah... cops haven't been spineless, bootlicking, cocksucking cowards only since hippies showed up; rather clashes with "hippies", as you call them, merely illuminate their interior landscape. A dumb pig doesn't seem quite as dumb and pig-like when it's among other dumb pigs; but put it next to a person, and WOW HOLY CRAP IT'S A PIG WITH A BAT!
We can't do that. There'll always be more people to feed and clothe, and our money will run out.
That would be true if there was no income and nothing produced, which happens to be not true. So, uhm? The money is there, it's just spent on other stuff.
But this professor is being a dickhead. He's predicting things at a time he'll be dead, (which he does for publicity) but he does nothing to actually progress this happening.
Oh, you mean like we could already feed, clothe and shelter every single being on this planet.... we just don't.
Don't you think that "profit" and "keeping people in line" will have ceased to exist in 50 years? Why professor, that's just fucking stupid, and what you get paid for -- to overlook these crucial details and derp around. SSDD.
The implication that OWS peeps are rapists kinda falls on the face considering they're also the ones dealing with them, so you can save yourself that one. Anything else?
Occupy Wall Street Erects Women-Only Tent After Reports Of Sexual Assaults
[..]
the 16-square-foot metal-framed tent will be watched by female members of the de-escalation team, and can sleep 18 people. "This is all about safety in numbers," 24-year-old protester Becky Wartell says.
One 23-year-old woman tells the paper that she'll be sleeping in the safe space "partially because of the recent attacks that have been happening." She adds, "I think that this will help bring more women to the movement as well. I think a lot of women have been hesitant and especially for those that are new and don't know a lot of people it's hard to find a safe place to stay."
But another 37-year-old protester from Park Slope tells the Daily News she feels safe enough in Zuccotti Park outside of the women-only tent: "Certainly women are the first target for any type of crazies, but I live in Park Slope, and the rapists there are more scary. I feel safer here.”
[..]
Soo.... you were saying? That OWS is some kind of rapist movement, instead of that being a blatant smear attempt, hmm?
IE – never abbreviate Internet Explorer; always use the full name
Say what you will about Microsoft, but any technical writer who is serious about being a better writer can learn a lot from the writers at Microsoft.
That's hilarious!
Microsoft has been criticized for their somewhat lukewarm embrace of open source. With the Microsoft Manual of Style, Microsoft is nearly freely sharing a huge amount of their intellectual capital.
Nobody said long URL's should be removed utterly. It's simply that search engines should stop caring about them: once they are useless to game search engines, they can *only* be used for the purposes you mentioned.... so without realizing it, you actually backed up what you thought you were arguing against:P
Furthermore, I know it's an article (and not a FAQ page, or a personal profile, or a sitemap or something) because it says "article" right there in the URL
The same would apply to http://www.site.com/article/12345, which is the version of that URL without the stupid bloat. You use case is for clicking random links in forums; why not interact with people who actually explain what they're linking to? It's not hard to provide decent anchor text etc, and when you searched for a phrase, it matters even less. And search is what we're talking about.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, kinda like the Nazis :/ Hopefully Goodwin will have the law on his side on this one though.
Yeah, and?
Since when did Notch make games?
Flamebait?
"fuck what you want" == "your arbitrary and unrealistic demands can be safely dismissed", worded more efficiently, and just as correct.
Oh well. Hope you get utterly fucked to itty bitty smithereens in metamoderation ^^
Well, fuck what you want then. Solved.
actually, for Opera this is what you want to link to: https://addons.opera.com/
Then they stumble around blindly and starve, because they ate/transformed all humans. Then they eat each other. Then the sun rises and life forms anew on the planet.
While "wary" is likely the originally intended meaning, "weary" also parses fine ^^
Uhm, just because it's also caching doesn't mean it's the caching that is discussed, so wtf are you even talking about..
What? Just because something is dynamically generated doesn't mean it magically changes each time it's requested, or that it can't use last-modified or etag headers and implement "304 not modified", or be explicit about what is to be cached for how long, and under which circumstances. Again, what are you even talking about. Seems like you're just stringing words together.
Nah... cops haven't been spineless, bootlicking, cocksucking cowards only since hippies showed up; rather clashes with "hippies", as you call them, merely illuminate their interior landscape. A dumb pig doesn't seem quite as dumb and pig-like when it's among other dumb pigs; but put it next to a person, and WOW HOLY CRAP IT'S A PIG WITH A BAT!
That would be true if there was no income and nothing produced, which happens to be not true. So, uhm? The money is there, it's just spent on other stuff.
Hmm, kinda like me ranting. Anyways... ^^
Oh, you mean like we could already feed, clothe and shelter every single being on this planet.... we just don't.
Don't you think that "profit" and "keeping people in line" will have ceased to exist in 50 years? Why professor, that's just fucking stupid, and what you get paid for -- to overlook these crucial details and derp around. SSDD.
WTF? That's nuts. What was the reason/excuse for that?
Being sloppy and greedy isn't among the risks that are unavoidable, not by any stretch.
Why don't you tell me? Be specific, if you can.
The implication that OWS peeps are rapists kinda falls on the face considering they're also the ones dealing with them, so you can save yourself that one. Anything else?
Do you even read the stuff you link?
Soo.... you were saying? That OWS is some kind of rapist movement, instead of that being a blatant smear attempt, hmm?
That's not "any technology". People for example *never* said that about sweatbands... so that wasn't even a nice try.
Larry and... Clinton Fucker :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPpkQBCPbMI
That's hilarious!
That's daft.
That's great for you, but really doesn't constitute an argument why search engines should take URL text into account :P
Nobody said long URL's should be removed utterly. It's simply that search engines should stop caring about them: once they are useless to game search engines, they can *only* be used for the purposes you mentioned.... so without realizing it, you actually backed up what you thought you were arguing against :P
The same would apply to http://www.site.com/article/12345, which is the version of that URL without the stupid bloat. You use case is for clicking random links in forums; why not interact with people who actually explain what they're linking to? It's not hard to provide decent anchor text etc, and when you searched for a phrase, it matters even less. And search is what we're talking about.
Not so bright and lame boy, sitting in a tree.... M-O-D-D-I-N-G.
agreed, and saluted.
+1 "wah wah, the truth, it burrrrns", haha.