On a more serious note than your post probably deserves, can you really equate a radar designed to be powerful enough to send waves out for tens, even hundreds of miles and then return off the target which isn't optimised to do that - probably the opposite - with something designed to send them a few hundred feet at most. Likely a different frequency too.
The tank was allegedly stolen from A-One Lift Truck Services, where it was available for hire and was popular with students who used it for school formals.
People's perception is important because it may be (and the study suggests) that it is people's perception that causes illness.
But if it's perception that it causes an illness that causes the illness, then the problem isn't the mast's, it's perception. So that's what should be changed. I'm not sure it's easy to do. Shouting "YOU"RE IMAGINING IT, YOU LOONS!" probably won't work.
It all sounds like a kind of circular argument to me.
It doesn't matter what the law was intended to do, but rather what the law can be twisted to imply.
When a politician says a law wasn't intended to mean or imply $something, and it can reasonably be interpreted such that it does mean that, then either the person who drafted it is a moron or the politicians' a liar.
Try making a "right angle mirror" that will a) stay clean after being shot out of a gun and b) still be right-angled after going through the deformation process.
By buying a system from someone else, you offload the risk of a patent ambush if you accidentally use somebody else's vague idea that they thought up after a few beers. Did I say vague idea? - I obviously meant hard work, skill and inventiveness.
My understanding was that men are by average slightly more intelligent than women - it's only a few IQ points - but that the variability is much more. Hence there are more male geniuses, but also more male imbeciles.
I don't know if the studies exclude people with actual congenital disorders. These would tend to affect males more, since they only have one copy of certain genes. I'm thinking the same mechanism as hemophilia (sp?) that was passed through females like Queen Victoria but affected only males. Something to do with X and Y?
the only reason I'm on the wage I am on and not something higher is because if I didn't cut the wanted rate, I wouldn't have gotten the work
Then the solution's simple - find someone who's getting more than you want, and undercut him. That's the problem with this country today, no entrepreneurialship.
We seem, after all, to have prevented the problem of people physically reaching out across the internet and strangling people...
We've prevented it the same way we've prevented trespass by teleportation and time-travel assisted stock fraud. The method revolves around not building the technology to enable it.
That's what happens when you elect a socialist government who somehow think that letting Italian criminals, Lebanese islamists and other assorted nair-do-well's in ahead of civilised English speaking people is somehow equal to giving the finger to the Queen of the Pommy's.
In my opinion, the main reason our health care costs are skyrocketing is because of our unhealthy lifestyles. America is the most obese nation in the world. We are obese because people follow unhealthy dietary and exercise habits.
Sounds like you're advocating prevention - where's the profit in that?
For some reason, people seem to feel inhibited about sending emails to 100 recipients, but less so about posting to a newsgroup.
My experience with corporate email is quite the opposite. You get idiots who include half the organisation on everything they send when in fact, there's one person who needs to know and three who are vaguely interested.
Slashdot Mirror
On a more serious note than your post probably deserves, can you really equate a radar designed to be powerful enough to send waves out for tens, even hundreds of miles and then return off the target which isn't optimised to do that - probably the opposite - with something designed to send them a few hundred feet at most. Likely a different frequency too.
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
It all sounds like a kind of circular argument to me.
By buying a system from someone else, you offload the risk of a patent ambush if you accidentally use somebody else's vague idea that they thought up after a few beers. Did I say vague idea? - I obviously meant hard work, skill and inventiveness.
My understanding was that men are by average slightly more intelligent than women - it's only a few IQ points - but that the variability is much more. Hence there are more male geniuses, but also more male imbeciles.
I don't know if the studies exclude people with actual congenital disorders. These would tend to affect males more, since they only have one copy of certain genes. I'm thinking the same mechanism as hemophilia (sp?) that was passed through females like Queen Victoria but affected only males. Something to do with X and Y?
Mainframe? Don't you mean a high capacity, legacy compatible application server?
Back when it was all diallup, the interweb was a series of straws.
On what grounds do you assume I don't know the difference? GP said US tax law, he didn't specify what kinfd of tax, and then contradicted himself.
Seemed like a witty observation on human nature to me.
... oooh shiny!
Like somebody[*] said, nobody went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
[*] I was going to look up who it was but
So ... there's some truth behind tinfoil hats after all?
Incredibly poor logic and a crappy analogy.
That's what happens when you elect a socialist government who somehow think that letting Italian criminals, Lebanese islamists and other assorted nair-do-well's in ahead of civilised English speaking people is somehow equal to giving the finger to the Queen of the Pommy's.
Rush Limbaugh & Michael Moore are the same person. If you want proof here it is, I've never seen them together - have you?
Ever wondered why it's not called the "bit's of colored paper" rule? Because gold has intrinsic value.
Gold has intrinsic value. Paper does not. Hence, paper money is a form of tax.