What you're saying is you're adaptable, I am similar, but also I am lazy - I learn new languages because I have to, not because some recruitment agency thinks they know what's good for me, but because the language itself has a use. 10 or 15 years ago, many of us thought AI was going to change the face of programming, as re-usable code became an "apply this class of algorithm with a drag and drop" kind of feel. Instead, Python is an attempt to say Perl was wrong, without really adding much to it and so either is fine and if you know one, you don't waste much time learning the other. People are still re-inventing the wheel and calling it something else and now and then, something clever comes along but doesn't get enough backing to change the shape of what we use. I am cynical about being replaced because of my age, because if this is the concern, whoever it is that is looking around has no idea what they really need at all.
Or one could gather range requests and create a merge list with no repeats and Apache should only keep 1 copy in memory, maybe if they have too many repeated requests for overlapping ranges the error could be "I'm sorry, could you repeat that please?"
Despite Nokia letting everyone with Maemo devices down for the future, Skype video on the N900 works quite well now that Desktop versions have caught up to it, over wi-fi or 3G.
14 Comments so far and no one seems to have read the Xen 4.1 wiki. Just to clarify, Xen and KVM are similar and you can use them for similar purposes. Xen 4.1 is aiming to be integrated into the native Kernel, it is very close already having some dom0 support now, native guest support as of 2.6.36 and will have full dom0 support soon. dom0 and domu kernels are now de-coupled, so things are going to become more generic which distributions will love.
I tried and failed at Xen 4.0 after using Xen 3.x successfully sometime beforehand - I have been waiting for all those involved to update, stabilise and simplify Xen - looks like it is coming very soon.
Redhat not using Xen for sometime now, fair enough, I'm not using Redhat so it won't bother me much.
I've never heard of such a blatant excuse for funding as "We have already placed a lot of money down trying to show evidence of gravity waves and come up with nothing, so why not pretend it is there so we can try again in a new way."
I for one, believe Einstein was right, but am so disappointed that so many physicists failed to understand how a detector may actually be impossible to build at all since it is entirely possible that Gravity Waves are merely an observable phenomenon as distant objects have apparent skews. A detector that feels a passing gravity wave either absorbs it and can interact with it, or if it bends the reference frame, it may leave no trace as it passes through since it is merely an illusion of skew for others to observe.
They seem to be counting on it interacting with matter in a way that must in some way throw away the principle of relativity - that c is a constant for any observer. The reason why c is a constant is becasue the reference frame bends to match it - or more precisely, nothing is bending, but it sure looks that way to an observer that is directly involved in space-time, since in observing themselves, nothing has changed and for the subject observed, the same self-observing story, but the subject *appears* to be in a different space-time to the object, to keep the 2 different locations under the same laws.
No energy states changed via gravity waves other than what resulted from quantum observations.
Actually, the URL you posted merely confirms it, check the the General relativity component and you'll find that unless the universe contains completely uniformly mathematically constructed content *and* reference frame together to define space-time, then the dependency of the reference frame's shape upon its content rules out time being a dimension anything like space is.
It cannot be modelled mathematically unless it involves statistics, which physicists hate to admit becasue it means no tractable solutions for real General Relativity problems exist.
Time is no dimension, but if you don't mind a little uncertainty, you can pretend it is.
I think its all about the money really - Microsoft paid a billion to Nokia to save their sinking mobile OS, now they are of the opinion its worth something, they are probably charging money for hardware manufacturers to to use it, despite Microsoft being behind the curve against a free mobile OS.
On the N900, I want Microsoft word suuport and I don't pay for Docs-to-go, I use either Abiword for simple docs or OpenOffice for stronger compatibility, I also use Gnumeric.
Yes, you are probably a little off - it seems that you are suggesting that no Internet cafe started unlicensed before gaining a license during this period. your figure of 5% could have an error margin as high as 1000%
Bah... Its an excuse - this has nothing to do with the reason they gave and everything to do with politics. Meanwhile, most of have seen the Linux Desktop become solid, stable, feature rich and most of the developers are now moving on to making netbooks and tablets fly as most of the major work is done.
It reminds me of when I finally bought a VHS machine just as they were being phased out for digital, the cheapest VHS machine came with 6 heads and Hi-Fi sound - it was finally technically complete so I got one cheap.
These guys have done the exact opposite - spent years with Linux as it continued to become a desktop master, now that it technically is, they drop it. Idiots!
The only people who talk like this about MS are somehow on their payroll. That's a lot of people, so it carries weight.
Nokia have learned through MS associations that the quality of the product being peddled is irrelevant and that strong marketing with walled garden tactics and a distribution network, sells.
From Nokias point of view, they don't really care if its Symbian, Meego or WM7 - just as long as their distribution network has life.
Currently, their distribution network is still strong - I think going with MS is their way of expanding their distribution network and the impact of which generation phone they are selling is minimal.
They are now amongst the ranks of MS, where since the customers opinion is irrelevant, I can only hope that the new generation of savvy customers drives Android and Intel further up - Intel have hedged their bets well and can safely proceed with Meego without fear of losses.
My daughter of 2 pulled the cord from the USB socket and managed to damage the cord, the socket is absolutely fine. I just bent the cord end back again and its working fine.
Meego will be supported on the N900 - its the reference platform for building upon Meego at present.
I don't mean to be rude, but this was in fact, Nokia's strategy. The N900 can sync with evolution because all the good software for it is open-source.
In the new release of the firmware, even the stock N900 comes with the maemo.org production repository already activated - so, even the stock N900 has a whole bunch of working applications - open source.
The strategy with Meego is that even when the N900 is defunct the reason will be something better is there to fill its place, even if it isn't made by Nokia - they'd be mad not to continue with its niche success.
It's precisely because the brute force method can be defeated just by scaling up the board size that go is a better game - humans don't use brute force to play it, which makes it a real game.
Slashdot Mirror
What you're saying is you're adaptable, I am similar, but also I am lazy - I learn new languages because I have to, not because some recruitment agency thinks they know what's good for me, but because the language itself has a use. 10 or 15 years ago, many of us thought AI was going to change the face of programming, as re-usable code became an "apply this class of algorithm with a drag and drop" kind of feel. Instead, Python is an attempt to say Perl was wrong, without really adding much to it and so either is fine and if you know one, you don't waste much time learning the other. People are still re-inventing the wheel and calling it something else and now and then, something clever comes along but doesn't get enough backing to change the shape of what we use. I am cynical about being replaced because of my age, because if this is the concern, whoever it is that is looking around has no idea what they really need at all.
Or one could gather range requests and create a merge list with no repeats and Apache should only keep 1 copy in memory, maybe if they have too many repeated requests for overlapping ranges the error could be "I'm sorry, could you repeat that please?"
Whoosh.
Despite Nokia letting everyone with Maemo devices down for the future, Skype video on the N900 works quite well now that Desktop versions have caught up to it, over wi-fi or 3G.
Do some research on why Arm vs. X86 is an issue as devices draw less power, the Arm can virtually switch off compared to the X86.
I tried and failed at Xen 4.0 after using Xen 3.x successfully sometime beforehand - I have been waiting for all those involved to update, stabilise and simplify Xen - looks like it is coming very soon.
Redhat not using Xen for sometime now, fair enough, I'm not using Redhat so it won't bother me much.
I for one, believe Einstein was right, but am so disappointed that so many physicists failed to understand how a detector may actually be impossible to build at all since it is entirely possible that Gravity Waves are merely an observable phenomenon as distant objects have apparent skews. A detector that feels a passing gravity wave either absorbs it and can interact with it, or if it bends the reference frame, it may leave no trace as it passes through since it is merely an illusion of skew for others to observe.
They seem to be counting on it interacting with matter in a way that must in some way throw away the principle of relativity - that c is a constant for any observer. The reason why c is a constant is becasue the reference frame bends to match it - or more precisely, nothing is bending, but it sure looks that way to an observer that is directly involved in space-time, since in observing themselves, nothing has changed and for the subject observed, the same self-observing story, but the subject *appears* to be in a different space-time to the object, to keep the 2 different locations under the same laws.
No energy states changed via gravity waves other than what resulted from quantum observations.
It cannot be modelled mathematically unless it involves statistics, which physicists hate to admit becasue it means no tractable solutions for real General Relativity problems exist.
Time is no dimension, but if you don't mind a little uncertainty, you can pretend it is.
I think its all about the money really - Microsoft paid a billion to Nokia to save their sinking mobile OS, now they are of the opinion its worth something, they are probably charging money for hardware manufacturers to to use it, despite Microsoft being behind the curve against a free mobile OS.
On the N900, I want Microsoft word suuport and I don't pay for Docs-to-go, I use either Abiword for simple docs or OpenOffice for stronger compatibility, I also use Gnumeric.
Yes, you are probably a little off - it seems that you are suggesting that no Internet cafe started unlicensed before gaining a license during this period. your figure of 5% could have an error margin as high as 1000%
GPS jammer at Indy.
I agree with Apple, both trademarks should be dismissed as generic.
It reminds me of when I finally bought a VHS machine just as they were being phased out for digital, the cheapest VHS machine came with 6 heads and Hi-Fi sound - it was finally technically complete so I got one cheap.
These guys have done the exact opposite - spent years with Linux as it continued to become a desktop master, now that it technically is, they drop it. Idiots!
The only people who talk like this about MS are somehow on their payroll. That's a lot of people, so it carries weight.
Nokia have learned through MS associations that the quality of the product being peddled is irrelevant and that strong marketing with walled garden tactics and a distribution network, sells.
From Nokias point of view, they don't really care if its Symbian, Meego or WM7 - just as long as their distribution network has life.
Currently, their distribution network is still strong - I think going with MS is their way of expanding their distribution network and the impact of which generation phone they are selling is minimal.
They are now amongst the ranks of MS, where since the customers opinion is irrelevant, I can only hope that the new generation of savvy customers drives Android and Intel further up - Intel have hedged their bets well and can safely proceed with Meego without fear of losses.
I thought that was the MPAA... OK.
...and what the hell is wrong with using a pre-configured suspend image anyhow? seems like a lot of effort wasted IMO.
... That and the pressure to win and embarrass the opposing team through any legitimate means and sometimes on the edge of legitimate.
Not only that, but they intercept requests made to external DNSs as well - altering the results before arriving at your PC in China.
My daughter of 2 pulled the cord from the USB socket and managed to damage the cord, the socket is absolutely fine. I just bent the cord end back again and its working fine.
Meego will be supported on the N900 - its the reference platform for building upon Meego at present.
I don't mean to be rude, but this was in fact, Nokia's strategy. The N900 can sync with evolution because all the good software for it is open-source.
In the new release of the firmware, even the stock N900 comes with the maemo.org production repository already activated - so, even the stock N900 has a whole bunch of working applications - open source.
The strategy with Meego is that even when the N900 is defunct the reason will be something better is there to fill its place, even if it isn't made by Nokia - they'd be mad not to continue with its niche success.
Even more-so than compression algorithms, moving pieces like this adds no complexity to the game outcomes at all.
Sounds to me like you think remembering the rules for chess is somehow impressive or even vaguely relevant to the quality of a good game.
Go vs. Chess. RISC vs. CISC all over again.
It's precisely because the brute force method can be defeated just by scaling up the board size that go is a better game - humans don't use brute force to play it, which makes it a real game.