And here's the 411 on the encryption fear, anyway: A quantum computer that could instantly break today's encryption could just as quickly create encryption that is impossible to break.
The difference is the NSA, and other government agencies (in various countries) will be the only ones able to afford quantum computers.
The courts aren't overturning the decisions because they were bad. They were overturning the decisions because the EPA failed at filling out paperwork/following procedures. It's a very easy ruling for a judge; you failed to follow checklist X. There is now a possibility the FCC failed to follow the right checklist.
I'm not saying the judges don't have a bias towards corporations, but this is a pretty black-and-white procedural issue.
The end result would probably be the FCC doing it under the correct rules, but we could delay the shitstorm a bit. That said, Pei is a lawyer (and knows too consult experts in the right types of law), so he probably got the procedures right.
Or sue them. If the process used to change the regulations failed to follow proper change processes, the decision can be overturned by the courts. A good portion of the EPAs actions have been successfully challenged in this way.
Hmm... interesting. The first links I get on DDG for "motion sensor" are hardware stores selling outdoor light sensors. Wasn't aware of the usage change. Sorry Bruce!
I'd be more concerned about power consumption than construction cost. Replacement fobs cost a couple hundred bucks, so there should be sufficient profit. I'm not even sure if the hands-free fobs have batteries or are just passive RFID.
Lastly, I've been desperately looking for cheap accelerometer all in one board. I haven't seen a usable accelerometer for $0.50, and certainly not once you count all the other pcb parts needed to make it work. I'd love to find out I'm out of the loop. any good recommendations?
It's a slide switch. You're right you have to dig it out, but only to toggle it. So do it while inside your home/office/etc as part of putting on your coat to go outside. I understand that some people like the hands-free nature, but making it toggle-able avoids this problem with less engineering/cost from a sensor.
Also, I'm not sure if the fobs have batteries, or are powered with received EM from the car.
Nitpick: I assume you mean it should have an accelerometer or other IMU package. A "motion sensor", as a term, tends to refer to a device that senses motion in the room (like that used to turn outside lights on as you approach).
Seems like a much more expensive solution than a button or slider switch to activate. Or socket in the car with a physical connection required.
Even if you were paying the same percentage of your salary for everything, you'd also be saving double as well. It's great if you have positive savings, and horrible if you have negative savings.
It's not great, sure. However, it is only used in the aggregate by the first-party provider (assuming you don't opt out). Google allows any app on your phone to get personal data on you. And your call/text logs seem even more sensitive than your GPS/SSID data.
Both are bad, but there are degrees of badness. Significant degrees.
This isn't just Facebook's fault. It's Google's too. Note how they only did this on Android phones. Because Apple made their OS protect their users, and Google made their OS enable spying.
True. However, that would let someone like Steve Jobs kill ".js" like he killed ".swf" files. I mean, remember when every fucking webpage was just a giant swf? Until it became unsupported on iPhones.
I can get stuff to my door in two-hours (one hour if I pay extra). That is drone delivery. Similarly, Uber and Lyft already supply on-demand self-driving cars. I mean, sure they can use tech to get people out of the loop, but as a consumer, I don't really care. Do you?
See, controlling 85% of all the smartphones in the world puts Google in a position to promote its own cross platform toolkit
I don't see why Android's market penetration matters. They're trying to compete with Android with a new OS. That's the same position as Microsoft was in. I mean, maybe Google could sabotage Android to force people to move to Fuchsia, but I'm not sure that would work. More likely, it would cause an Android fork where Amazon or someone maintained it.
Fact is, (almost) no one cares about a Google phone. But a lot of people are committed to an Android phone.
I just want to get apps out of my HTML. Why can't we have a way of communicating over the internet that's safe and static. That way, I don't have to arbitrarily run code from 100 included sites (any of which may get compromised) to read your damn article.
I'm all for SPAs like Facebook existing... and even running in the same browser. But I just wish they could have just been.js files navigated to (or whatever), so I can tell my browser not to go there unless it's whitelisted.
Microsoft purchased Xamarin, a native cross-platform engine, that could export to iOS and Android (and Windows Phone). They gave it to everyone for free. Yet, it still wasn't enough to make people to develop enough software for Windows Phone to make it viable in the marketplace. I tend to think Fuscia is going to suffer from the same lack of software.
A major difference is, unlike Google, MS supports their product line (you can still get Xamarin free). Whereas building an app on something that won't exist in 5 years seems silly. Also, Xamarin runs on.NET; this runs on Dart. I can find.NET programmers easily.
So, I don't think this is going to work. But I wish them luck.
Sure there is.I was on a website, reading an article about the benefits of using tool type X vs tool type Y for a project.. There was a link on that page to their "recommendations." Were their recommendations sponsors? Yes. However this site made it clear that they rejected brands as sponsors if they thought they were too expensive/poor quality. So, I chose one brand over another, cause they all seemed equally priced and reviews seemed about equal too.
If you can afford it, please do the world a favor and keep your subscription for another couple of months, until the feature goes live. If you cancel now, you're part of the baseline cancellation numbers. If you cancel after this goes into effect, you're part of the "cancelled after X" cohort. If that cohort is big enough, compared to the baseline, they'll walk it back.
So, cancelling now makes this feature look more popular to statistics than if you never cancelled.
We know this works because Hulu tried making iDevices not output video over HDMI. They saw higher cancellation raters among people who "upgraded" to that client. It was so bad, they rolled back that "feature", and HDMI output works again.
Really? In 2017, their sales went up 37% to $178 billion. Their operating income went down by 2% to $4.1 billion, and their net income was $3 billion. Which means their net operating profit, as a percent, is ~1.5%. Which is pretty damn close to zero. WalMart's is twice that at ~3%. Apples is 13x that at ~20%.
Also, I think you're looking at operating profit, not net profit. But, I could be wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
The difference is the NSA, and other government agencies (in various countries) will be the only ones able to afford quantum computers.
The courts aren't overturning the decisions because they were bad. They were overturning the decisions because the EPA failed at filling out paperwork/following procedures. It's a very easy ruling for a judge; you failed to follow checklist X. There is now a possibility the FCC failed to follow the right checklist.
I'm not saying the judges don't have a bias towards corporations, but this is a pretty black-and-white procedural issue.
The end result would probably be the FCC doing it under the correct rules, but we could delay the shitstorm a bit. That said, Pei is a lawyer (and knows too consult experts in the right types of law), so he probably got the procedures right.
Or sue them. If the process used to change the regulations failed to follow proper change processes, the decision can be overturned by the courts. A good portion of the EPAs actions have been successfully challenged in this way.
Hmm... interesting. The first links I get on DDG for "motion sensor" are hardware stores selling outdoor light sensors. Wasn't aware of the usage change. Sorry Bruce!
I'd be more concerned about power consumption than construction cost. Replacement fobs cost a couple hundred bucks, so there should be sufficient profit. I'm not even sure if the hands-free fobs have batteries or are just passive RFID.
Lastly, I've been desperately looking for cheap accelerometer all in one board. I haven't seen a usable accelerometer for $0.50, and certainly not once you count all the other pcb parts needed to make it work. I'd love to find out I'm out of the loop. any good recommendations?
It's a slide switch. You're right you have to dig it out, but only to toggle it. So do it while inside your home/office/etc as part of putting on your coat to go outside. I understand that some people like the hands-free nature, but making it toggle-able avoids this problem with less engineering/cost from a sensor.
Also, I'm not sure if the fobs have batteries, or are powered with received EM from the car.
Sure, hence the other idea of a slide switch to activate/deactivate fob. Deactivate when you get home/to work. Activate before you walk outside.
Personally, I would prefer a button, but there are pluses and minuses.
Nitpick: I assume you mean it should have an accelerometer or other IMU package. A "motion sensor", as a term, tends to refer to a device that senses motion in the room (like that used to turn outside lights on as you approach).
Seems like a much more expensive solution than a button or slider switch to activate. Or socket in the car with a physical connection required.
Even if you were paying the same percentage of your salary for everything, you'd also be saving double as well. It's great if you have positive savings, and horrible if you have negative savings.
It's not great, sure. However, it is only used in the aggregate by the first-party provider (assuming you don't opt out). Google allows any app on your phone to get personal data on you. And your call/text logs seem even more sensitive than your GPS/SSID data.
Both are bad, but there are degrees of badness. Significant degrees.
This isn't just Facebook's fault. It's Google's too. Note how they only did this on Android phones. Because Apple made their OS protect their users, and Google made their OS enable spying.
Yes I did. Han shot first, no matter what Lucas says now.
True. However, that would let someone like Steve Jobs kill ".js" like he killed ".swf" files. I mean, remember when every fucking webpage was just a giant swf? Until it became unsupported on iPhones.
That's great for you, but I watch videos with other people sometimes...
I can get stuff to my door in two-hours (one hour if I pay extra). That is drone delivery. Similarly, Uber and Lyft already supply on-demand self-driving cars. I mean, sure they can use tech to get people out of the loop, but as a consumer, I don't really care. Do you?
I don't see why Android's market penetration matters. They're trying to compete with Android with a new OS. That's the same position as Microsoft was in. I mean, maybe Google could sabotage Android to force people to move to Fuchsia, but I'm not sure that would work. More likely, it would cause an Android fork where Amazon or someone maintained it.
Fact is, (almost) no one cares about a Google phone. But a lot of people are committed to an Android phone.
I just want to get apps out of my HTML. Why can't we have a way of communicating over the internet that's safe and static. That way, I don't have to arbitrarily run code from 100 included sites (any of which may get compromised) to read your damn article.
I'm all for SPAs like Facebook existing... and even running in the same browser. But I just wish they could have just been .js files navigated to (or whatever), so I can tell my browser not to go there unless it's whitelisted.
Microsoft purchased Xamarin, a native cross-platform engine, that could export to iOS and Android (and Windows Phone). They gave it to everyone for free. Yet, it still wasn't enough to make people to develop enough software for Windows Phone to make it viable in the marketplace. I tend to think Fuscia is going to suffer from the same lack of software.
A major difference is, unlike Google, MS supports their product line (you can still get Xamarin free). Whereas building an app on something that won't exist in 5 years seems silly. Also, Xamarin runs on .NET; this runs on Dart. I can find .NET programmers easily.
So, I don't think this is going to work. But I wish them luck.
... are bragging about something that actually changed in the world as opposed to an announced policy/summit/meeting that is just hot air./p.
In what way?
Machinists operate machines. Cars are a type of machine (esp. when they were a new invention). Bigger unions usually mean more power.
Sure, up to $9.29 an hour. That info was in the summary (although it did require subtracting the pay from the gross.)
Sure there is.I was on a website, reading an article about the benefits of using tool type X vs tool type Y for a project.. There was a link on that page to their "recommendations." Were their recommendations sponsors? Yes. However this site made it clear that they rejected brands as sponsors if they thought they were too expensive/poor quality. So, I chose one brand over another, cause they all seemed equally priced and reviews seemed about equal too.
If you can afford it, please do the world a favor and keep your subscription for another couple of months, until the feature goes live. If you cancel now, you're part of the baseline cancellation numbers. If you cancel after this goes into effect, you're part of the "cancelled after X" cohort. If that cohort is big enough, compared to the baseline, they'll walk it back.
So, cancelling now makes this feature look more popular to statistics than if you never cancelled.
We know this works because Hulu tried making iDevices not output video over HDMI. They saw higher cancellation raters among people who "upgraded" to that client. It was so bad, they rolled back that "feature", and HDMI output works again.
I meant more like, "You must use UE4 to use our store." It's obviously not there now, but if it takes off...
Really? In 2017, their sales went up 37% to $178 billion. Their operating income went down by 2% to $4.1 billion, and their net income was $3 billion. Which means their net operating profit, as a percent, is ~1.5%. Which is pretty damn close to zero. WalMart's is twice that at ~3%. Apples is 13x that at ~20%.
Also, I think you're looking at operating profit, not net profit. But, I could be wrong.