Which part of the phrase "inalienable human rights" don't you understand? The rights don't just apply to citizens.
Also if you're going to claim that rights can be suspended during wartime (a reasonable claim), then when has torture ever produced useful intelligence? From a purely pragmatic point of view GITMO serves no useful purpose.
I don't think it's to silence whistle-blowers. If you want to blow the whistle you could buy a cheap usb stick, download everything onto that and send out the info from an internet cafe or someone's unsecured wi-fi. The wikileaks comment wasn't in TFA from what I saw.
It's as simple as government business should not be done on free webmail accounts due to security risks. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet were using gmail for work. These people are the staff for the top MPs. Cabinet documents are supposed to be confidential for 30 years (being reduced to 20 over the next 10 years). I'll remind you that some prominent peoples gmail accounts have been hacked recently, e.g. Chinese human rights activists.
I have my bookmarks sorted into folders too. Despite this, I use the awesome bar because typing a few letters then pressing down arrow, enter is way quicker than navigating through two or three levels of menus.
I think they'd be scratching their heads at the fact we built PET bottles that last for thousands of years and threw them away after one use. Why did we bury all these perfectly good bottles?
What about the prequel? It's an epic story starting at the creation of the universe and describing the history of God's people from then until 400 years before the birth of the boy.
You'd probably have enough material to make several movies out of it.
The I, Robot movie stank. No plot, the special effects were cheesy. As for exploring the three laws, never in the books did they remove the first law so the robots would be killers bent on destroying humanity. That's a pretty shallow look at the laws and how they interact.
I agree that it would have been hard to follow the book faithfully and make a compelling movie. Tossing out the book and putting Asimov's name on a turd is something I like less.
China isn't clean; pick your pollutant there's plenty of it being dumped into the environment. And Greenhouse gas is one type of pollution (not the only one but its all the media goes on about these days).
My car purchase was linked to the Internet. I did all the research online of what I wanted and what was available in the local area. I'm pretty sure this idea could be applied to cheating too if you were so inclined.
Slashdot Mirror
Which part of the phrase "inalienable human rights" don't you understand? The rights don't just apply to citizens.
Also if you're going to claim that rights can be suspended during wartime (a reasonable claim), then when has torture ever produced useful intelligence? From a purely pragmatic point of view GITMO serves no useful purpose.
This is a hardware /dev/null. Think how much quicker it will be.
I think it's sad that you got modded funny. Your post had a serious point.
You wouldn't steal a fibre optic cable...
(But you would use said fibre optic to pirate a movie).
You don't need to withdraw with either condoms or the pill. That's the whole point of contraception.
Both are 100% effective if used correctly.
That's only a USA thing where you pay to receive messages. I haven't heard of that anywhere else.
No mod points today, but this post deserves much better than 1 Funny it is currently at.
I don't think it's to silence whistle-blowers. If you want to blow the whistle you could buy a cheap usb stick, download everything onto that and send out the info from an internet cafe or someone's unsecured wi-fi. The wikileaks comment wasn't in TFA from what I saw.
It's as simple as government business should not be done on free webmail accounts due to security risks. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet were using gmail for work. These people are the staff for the top MPs. Cabinet documents are supposed to be confidential for 30 years (being reduced to 20 over the next 10 years). I'll remind you that some prominent peoples gmail accounts have been hacked recently, e.g. Chinese human rights activists.
Drill Baby Drill!
Whoooooooooosh!
(unless Grab has a second meaning I'm unfamiliar with).
I find it hard to believe that FF4 is using over a gig of RAM (what my Win7 + IE9 VM uses).
I have my bookmarks sorted into folders too. Despite this, I use the awesome bar because typing a few letters then pressing down arrow, enter is way quicker than navigating through two or three levels of menus.
I think they'd be scratching their heads at the fact we built PET bottles that last for thousands of years and threw them away after one use. Why did we bury all these perfectly good bottles?
What about the prequel? It's an epic story starting at the creation of the universe and describing the history of God's people from then until 400 years before the birth of the boy.
You'd probably have enough material to make several movies out of it.
The I, Robot movie stank. No plot, the special effects were cheesy. As for exploring the three laws, never in the books did they remove the first law so the robots would be killers bent on destroying humanity. That's a pretty shallow look at the laws and how they interact.
I agree that it would have been hard to follow the book faithfully and make a compelling movie. Tossing out the book and putting Asimov's name on a turd is something I like less.
How dare Blizzard copy Games Workshop. Warhammer is such an original setting and never copied anything from anyone, especially not Tolkein. /sarcasm.
China isn't clean; pick your pollutant there's plenty of it being dumped into the environment. And Greenhouse gas is one type of pollution (not the only one but its all the media goes on about these days).
http://www.chinahush.com/2009/10/21/amazing-pictures-pollution-in-china/
Alex: name all keybindings not used by emacs.
Me: What is the empty set?
My car purchase was linked to the Internet. I did all the research online of what I wanted and what was available in the local area. I'm pretty sure this idea could be applied to cheating too if you were so inclined.
I've got two questions: "How much?" and "Give it to me!"
People don't switch to the superior solution. They buy the cheapest. There is good empirical evidence that this is the case.
How does allegedly tampering with a condom make one a rapist? Sure if he did it it's a sexual crime, but it's not rape.
I guess its too much to expect facts to be reported. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
Amadeus? Seriously?
Just float around and think of England.
A quote I read once: "The biggest fear in America is not having a gun pointed at you. It's not being able to point one back."