Ok, so this is not statistically meaningful, but from a sample size of two students (well, my kids) here:
The elder got the question in two seconds and filled the parenthesis with a 7 within 5. No help. The younger couldn't "get" the question, even with some prompting, and filled the parenthesis with 11.
They are eight and six years' old; neither are especially mathematically talented, but put in more than average effort according to their teachers on that subject. Both go to the local (non-private average-sized) school. I'd think (i.e., place a small bet on it) around half the 7-to-9 year olds at that school would be able to "do" this problem correctly.
How old are these "middle grade students" in the study? This kind of age? I can't see it in TFA.
So the higher the frequency of your signal, the more bandwidth you can get.
I'm sorry, but this is just wrong. The higher the bandwidth of your signal, the more data (symbols viz. Nyquist) can be sent.
If one were to use Single Side Band transmission, for example, the carrier could be at 76Hz and, using simple Amplitude Modulation this could be extended towards say 60GHz, giving, well a Freeking Large symbol rate.
Of course, doing this would interfere with every single electronic and probably every single electric item such as I dunno, a 60Hz light bulb. But it could be done, says Mr Tesla.
(You'll need to grep wikipedia for thing I should have linked to. Tired. Very tired. )
-- Brain the size of a peanut.
The above is corrected version courtesy of the cup of v. strong coffee on my desk, and is bought to you by the number 42 and the letter fark.
So the higher the frequency of your signal, the more bandwidth you can get.
I'm sorry, but this is just wrong. The higher the bandwidth of your signal, the more data (symbols viz. Nyquist) can be sent.
If one were to use Single Side Band transmission, for example, the carrier could be at 76Hz and, using simple Frequency Modulation this could be extended towards say 60GHz, giving, well a Freeking Large symbol rate.
Of course, doing this would interfere with every single electronic and probably every single electric item such as I dunno, a 60Hz light bulb. But it could be done
(You'll need to grep wikipedia for thing I should have linked to. Tired. Very tired)
Kiss. Best PDP-11 look-alike. No end of programmers. Programming model a dream, vs..... IMHO, the 8086 (8088, if you really like 8-bit busses) was Not Really Good. "Short" addressing, vs., "Long", vs. ?"Extended". Bwahararahahahahahah.
A Z80 could do same as "paged mode" (but slowwwwer) by a quick poke to the e.g., 74LS322. 12 years' earlier, too. -- Intel iAPX 432: Fantabulious, NOT.
A suicidal person on the brink of killing themselves is - indeed as you write, and I paraphrase - not really in a position to make a rational judgement.
However (and I speak from personal experience and 25 years of on-and-off "being there", for which I have professional help), such a person is not necessarily as you suggest.
Eh, what?
>simply replace the cache memory with on-board memory
On-board being what? On the PCB? Sooo, replace the quick-to-access memory with the stuff on the motherboard? Remember the 1980s?
>then we're talking panacea cakes, batman.
Cough.
>Naturally, this will first occur in low-performance devices where huge amounts of memory are not necessary. Then, it will work its way into the PC and up from there.
Ditto.
>[other trite crap.]
N/C
No idea where Hawkins got his ideas from but this is not only old hat: The hat was eaten by a large gerbil some time ago and we're all wearing the t-shirts.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok, so this is not statistically meaningful, but from a sample size of two students (well, my kids) here:
The elder got the question in two seconds and filled the parenthesis with a 7 within 5. No help.
The younger couldn't "get" the question, even with some prompting, and filled the parenthesis with 11.
They are eight and six years' old; neither are especially mathematically talented, but put in more than average effort according to their teachers on that subject.
Both go to the local (non-private average-sized) school.
I'd think (i.e., place a small bet on it) around half the 7-to-9 year olds at that school would be able to "do" this problem correctly.
How old are these "middle grade students" in the study? This kind of age? I can't see it in TFA.
Actually it's an increase in the frequency bandwidth that get's you higher capacity, not the increase in the actual carrier frequency.
Agreed, you AC, you.
So the higher the frequency of your signal, the more bandwidth you can get.
I'm sorry, but this is just wrong. The higher the bandwidth of your signal, the more data (symbols viz. Nyquist) can be sent.
If one were to use Single Side Band transmission, for example, the carrier could be at 76Hz and, using simple Amplitude Modulation this could be extended towards say 60GHz, giving, well a Freeking Large symbol rate.
Of course, doing this would interfere with every single electronic and probably every single electric item such as I dunno, a 60Hz light bulb. But it could be done, says Mr Tesla.
(You'll need to grep wikipedia for thing I should have linked to. Tired. Very tired. )
--
Brain the size of a peanut.
The above is corrected version courtesy of the cup of v. strong coffee on my desk, and is bought to you by the number 42 and the letter fark.
So the higher the frequency of your signal, the more bandwidth you can get.
I'm sorry, but this is just wrong. The higher the bandwidth of your signal, the more data (symbols viz. Nyquist) can be sent.
If one were to use Single Side Band transmission, for example, the carrier could be at 76Hz and, using simple Frequency Modulation this could be extended towards say 60GHz, giving, well a Freeking Large symbol rate.
Of course, doing this would interfere with every single electronic and probably every single electric item such as I dunno, a 60Hz light bulb. But it could be done
(You'll need to grep wikipedia for thing I should have linked to. Tired. Very tired)
--
Thanks fish, so long, or something.
> Air Operations Simulation Centre in Melbourne creates virtual words
Vs. those pesky actual words others use?
Tsk.
Kiss.
Best PDP-11 look-alike. No end of programmers.
Programming model a dream, vs.....
IMHO, the 8086 (8088, if you really like 8-bit busses) was Not Really Good.
"Short" addressing, vs., "Long", vs. ?"Extended". Bwahararahahahahahah.
A Z80 could do same as "paged mode" (but slowwwwer) by a quick poke to the e.g., 74LS322. 12 years' earlier, too.
--
Intel iAPX 432: Fantabulious,
NOT.
If IIRC, you are indeed Sir, right.
I'm going to agree with you here: the plots look like the kind of thing that a school kid could write for (say) an Acorn Atom c. 1982.
Bhut, I'd be pleased if a FS project I was deeply involved in got to 10k commits.
--
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Per your contrition, 1,$s/kW/W/g surely.
Bhutt it's easily done; I did almost the same myself in an important exam at 18:
"What is the velocity of the hour hand of the clock?"
"Easy" I thought: 2PiRadians/hour. Wrote it.
Then I exited said exam and immediately thought:
"F*ck!"
[it's 2PiRadians/12hours BTW]
--
WGAF today: it's Comic Relief Day here
250kW/s/litre is 250x10^3/3600 which is 69.4W/hour.
Which seems about right.
Bad form to reply to self, but anyhow...
/Opinion/, he said, passing an opinion.
/Informative/, to me, means "provides useful information". It should not mean
Interesting to see what this post gets tagged then.
--
cash-=2*p;
The GP is correct: Power is measured in watts, and "one horsepower" is 740-ish of them.
Current, on the other hand, is measured in amps.
You could have said "[] cleaners' motors draw a number of amps, and here in the US with our 120v mains, you'd need at least a 10amp motor..."
But, you cannot say "[] cleaners are rated in Amps of power". Makes no sense.
Why the parent is rated Informative is anyone's guess.
Having spent 10k+ hours programming, I am now far from a programming genius. The more you gnow...
A suicidal person on the brink of killing themselves is - indeed as you write, and I paraphrase - not really in a position to make a rational judgement.
However (and I speak from personal experience and 25 years of on-and-off "being there", for which I have professional help), such a person is not necessarily as you suggest.
Sometimes the pain is too much.
Sincerely,
-dspart
Yes, very good.
"You're full of shit.": well, quite possibly.
Constipation is, however, not directly related to body temperature.
If so, my practitioner verified 109F I had for 72 hours in 1981 means my colon must have been full of concrete.
Eh, what? >simply replace the cache memory with on-board memory On-board being what? On the PCB? Sooo, replace the quick-to-access memory with the stuff on the motherboard? Remember the 1980s? >then we're talking panacea cakes, batman. Cough. >Naturally, this will first occur in low-performance devices where huge amounts of memory are not necessary. Then, it will work its way into the PC and up from there. Ditto. >[other trite crap.] N/C
...which is already defined: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dspart
Mssr. Hawking is way behind - even my t-shirt is more up-to-date, lol.
0.
No idea where Hawkins got his ideas from but this is not only old hat: The hat was eaten by a large gerbil some time ago and we're all wearing the t-shirts.
Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dspart for a full discussion on the topic, a peer-reviewed proof and discussion of the consequences.
Love,
0. The large gerbil
2^0.=0.